Implementing a formal curriculum on surgical ethics and palliative care for otolaryngology residents.

OBJECTIVE: Residents are faced with ethical issues every day but most residency curriculums do not routinely include formal ethics skills training. In order to address this, a comprehensive curriculum on ethics and surgical palliative care was implemented for otolaryngology residents. METHODS: An 8-h ethics didactics curriculum was designed in collaboration with our institution's Institute of Ethics. Varied strategies were used to cover basic principles and practical skills. Anonymous assessments were completed by learners at 3 points during the curriculum on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Nine residents were surveyed. Prior to the curriculum, a large majority of residents (85 %) expressed little to no familiarity with basic ethical principles. There was statistically significant improvement in understanding of and familiarity with bioethics topics, including the four principles of bioethics (Δ = 2.4, p = 0.004). There was also statistically significant improvement in comfort with the implementation of ethical decision making and palliative care skills, including with difficult conversations with patients (Δ = 1.3, p = 0.03). Participation in sessions was excellent with positive qualitative feedback. CONCLUSION: An interactive curriculum in ethics and palliative care can be engaging and practical for busy surgical residents, with measurable improvement in comfort with challenging cases and ethical, patient-centered care.

Can GPT-4 revolutionize otolaryngology? Navigating opportunities and ethical considerations.

Otolaryngologists can enhance workflow efficiency, provide better patient care, and advance medical research and education by integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into their practices. GPT-4 technology is a revolutionary and contemporary example of AI that may apply to otolaryngology. The knowledge of otolaryngologists should be supplemented, not replaced when using GPT-4 to make critical medical decisions and provide individualized patient care. In our thorough examination, we explore the potential uses of the groundbreaking GPT-4 technology in the field of otolaryngology, covering aspects such as potential outcomes and technical boundaries. Additionally, we delve into the intricate and intellectually challenging dilemmas that emerge when incorporating GPT-4 into otolaryngology, considering the ethical considerations inherent in its implementation. Our stance is that GPT-4 has the potential to be very helpful. Its capabilities, which include aid in clinical decision-making, patient care, and administrative job automation, present exciting possibilities for enhancing patient outcomes, boosting the efficiency of healthcare delivery, and enhancing patient experiences. Even though there are still certain obstacles and limitations, the progress made so far shows that GPT-4 can be a valuable tool for modern medicine. GPT-4 may play a more significant role in clinical practice as technology develops, helping medical professionals deliver high-quality care tailored to every patient's unique needs.

Navigating the Ethics of COVID-19 in Otolaryngology.

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically altered how otolaryngologists contemplate and assume their roles in health care delivery. The ethical implications of this pandemic upon our practice are formidable and distinct from other surgical fields. The salient ethical issues of public health stewardship and safety, distributive justice, and nonabandonment are distilled for the practicing otolaryngologist.

Practical and ethical issues for delivery of advanced ENT services in the Indian subcontinent: efforts to 'Bridge the Gap'.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Indian healthcare industry, one of the largest in the world, caters for 1.3 billion people. The modern middle class addresses its needs by visiting private hospitals, which provide comprehensive services but at a high cost. The low socioeconomic individuals visit government hospitals where all basic services are available, but there is a struggle to provide advanced healthcare. In order to rectify this dichotomous approach, new initiatives are being implemented to provide uniform healthcare across the society. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advancements have been rapid and modern methods have reached the shores of India at the same pace as in the western world. In otolaryngology, advanced services especially for restoration of hearing loss and multimodality treatments for head and neck cancers have been two areas where practical and ethical dilemmas have existed to provide the most optimal treatment at subsidized costs. This article explores these two areas as examples to understand the specific problems encountered in delivering advanced ENT care in a low-resource setting in a large populous country. SUMMARY: Introduction of government health insurance schemes have helped the poor to make use of advanced healthcare. The highlight of this scheme has been the inclusion of expensive interventions like cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation, whereby cost of the device, surgery and habilitation have all been delivered cost free for eligible children.

Reg-ent within the Learning Health System.

Clinical data registries are perhaps one of the most powerful outcomes of electronic medical records, and their benefits are projected to redound to patients and clinicians across the nation. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's Reg-ent fits within the conceptual framework of a learning health system. Because the data within this system are deidentified, research informed consent is not legally required. But ethical concerns remain regarding whether and how to best notify, and whether to obtain consent from, patients whose data are included. Particularly because data corroborate that a substantial minority of survey respondents believe that consent should be obtained for each research protocol (even for deidentified research) and because data breaches are, unfortunately, a serious risk, we recommend that the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation ensure best practices for patient engagement as it continues to build Reg-ent.

[Individualized, personalized and stratified medicine: a challenge for allergology in ENT?]. / Individualisierte, personalisierte, stratifizierte Medizin: eine Herausforderung für die Allergologie in der HNO?

Individualized, personalized or stratified medicine approaches offer emerging opportunities in the field of allergy and ENT. Avoidance of side effects, targeted therapy approaches and stratified prevention promise better outcomes and optimal results for patients. Conceptual incongruencies remain with regard to definitions and perceptions of "personalized medicine". Serious ethical considerations have to be taken into account. The development of pharmacogenomics, molecular phenotyping, genomic sequencing and other -omics opens the door to unique mechanistic therapeutic advances. The molecular allergology and recombinant diagnostics available are tools that offer substantial improved diagnostics for the benefit of allergic patients, e. g. in anaphylaxis and food allergy. For stratified therapeutic approaches, however, regulatory affairs will have to keep pace with medical and scientific discovery.

Expert witness testimony guidelines: identifying areas for improvement.

Expert witnesses play an invaluable, if controversial, role by deciphering medical events for juries in cases of alleged negligence. We review expert witness guidelines among major surgical societies and identify gaps within these standards, as our hope is that this spurs discussion addressing areas for improvement. Of 8 surgical societies with accessible guidelines, none included specific compensation guidelines or limits, detailed reporting mechanisms regarding unethical behavior by legal professionals, or addressed the appropriateness of testifying frequently and exclusively for one side. Several processes possibly deterring grossly inaccurate testimony have been adopted by other surgical societies and should potentially be addressed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. These include offering an expert witness testimony certification path, strengthening the formalized grievance process, and encouraging members to sign an affirmation statement.

Ethical issues in laryngology: tracheal stenting as palliative care.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To improve understanding of aspects of end-of-life care that may not be intuitive to the otolaryngology community. DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed by searching Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Primary manuscripts' bibliographies were reviewed to identify any nonindexed references. Prospective consultation by means of one-on-one interviews was sought from nonotolaryngology key stakeholders in the areas of hospice nursing care and patient advocacy in order to identify pertinent issues. RESULTS: We identified over 1,000 articles published from 1965 to 2013 on the topic of tracheal stents, as well as over 40,000 on hospice/end-of-life care. Three articles focusing specifically on palliative care and airway stenting were identified, of which three were case reports and none were definitive reviews. There are a number of significant issues and concepts unique to hospice care. These are likely unfamiliar to all except for head and neck oncology-specialized otolaryngologists. An example is that hospice care focuses on quality of life rather than prolongation of life (such as curative surgery). Patients with nonoperable tracheal obstruction from malignancy face an unpleasant demise from suffocation. For those patients, stenting can relieve suffering by restoring airway patency. CONCLUSIONS: Airway stenting can be a valid palliative care option, even for terminal patients receiving hospice care, when performed to relieve airway obstruction and improve quality of life. End-of-life ethics is an underdeveloped area of otolaryngology that should be explored.

Surgical Training and Education in Promoting Professionalism: a comparative assessment of virtue-based leadership development in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residents.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical Training and Education in Promoting Professionalism (STEPP) was developed in 2011 to train tomorrow's leaders during residency. It is based on virtue ethics and takes an approach similar to West Point military academy. The purpose of this research was: (i) to compare the virtue profiles of our residents with that of the military cohort using a standardized virtue assessment tool; and (ii) to assess the value of virtue education on residents. METHODS: As part of STEPP, otolaryngology residents participated in a virtue-based validated assessment tool called Virtue in Action (VIA) Inventory. This was completed at the initiation of STEPP in July 2011 as well as 1 year later in June 2012. Comparison of the VIA to a military cohort was performed. Leadership 'Basic Training' is a series of forums focused on virtues of initiative, integrity, responsibility, self-discipline, and accountability. A pre- and post-test was administered assessing resident perceptions of the value of this 'Basic Training'. RESULTS: Virtues are shared between otolaryngology residents (n=9) and military personnel (n=2,433) as there were no significant differences in strength scores between two military comparison groups and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) residents. There was a significant improvement (p<0.001) in the understanding of components of the leadership vision and a significant improvement in the understanding of key leadership concepts based on 'Basic Training'. All residents responded in the post-test that the STEPP program was valuable, up from 56%. CONCLUSIONS: A virtue-based approach is valued by residents as a part of leadership training during residency.

Social networking and professionalism in otolaryngology residency applicants.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess compliance with Accreditation Council for Graduation Medical Education standards of professionalism among otolaryngology residency applicants with publicly searchable Facebook profiles. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Applicants to an otolaryngology residency program were searched on the Facebook website. Multiple matches were narrowed by available information until the correct individual was identified. Searches were performed in a manner that would not allow access to restricted information, thus showing only what would be accessible publicly. Four reviewers evaluated all profiles and generated a professionalism score. Scores were collated with National Resident Matching Program data and match results to identify significant associations. RESULTS: Of the 234 applicants to our institution, 119 had Facebook profiles. Of these, 85 profiles contained information beyond simple demographics. Eleven percent of applicant profiles contained pictures or text that at least one reviewer felt could be perceived as unprofessional. There were six profiles with content considered to be concerning and one profile that contained clear violations of professional boundaries. Professionalism score did not correlate with whether the applicant matched, was interviewed, or received a place on the rank list. Age, gender, marital status, and Step 1 score did not correlate with a lower professionalism score. Our series included 61% of all otolaryngology applicants. CONCLUSIONS: Publicly available Facebook profiles with questionable content existed for 11% of otolaryngology applicants in this series. This finding did not affect applicants' match outcomes, nor was it predicted by any data available on the applicants' applications.

Bioethics and medical/legal considerations on cochlear implants in children.

UNLABELLED: Cochlear implants are the best treatment for congenital profound deafness. Pediatric candidates to implantation are seen as vulnerable citizens, and the decision of implanting cochlear devices is ultimately in the hands of their parents/guardians. The Brazilian Penal Code dictates that deaf people may enjoy diminished criminal capacity. Many are the bioethical controversies around cochlear implants, as representatives from the deaf community have seen in them a means of decimating their culture and intrinsic values. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to discuss, in bioethical terms, the validity of implanting cochlear hearing aids in children by analyzing their vulnerability and the social/cultural implications of the procedure itself, aside from looking into the medical/legal aspects connected to their criminal capacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The topic was searched on databases Medline and Lilacs; ethical analysis was done based on principialist bioethics. RESULTS: Cochlear implants are the best therapeutic option for people with profound deafness and are morally justified. The level of criminal capacity attributed to deaf people requires careful analysis of the subject's degree of understanding and determination when carrying out the acts for which he/she has been charged. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implants are morally valid. Implantations must be analyzed on an each case basis. ENT physicians bear the ethical responsibility for indicating cochlear implants and must properly inform the child's parents/guardians and get their written consent before performing the procedure.

Research ethics in animal models.

UNLABELLED: The use of animals in scientific experiments has been described since the fifth century BC. A number of scientific advances in health are attributed to animal models. The issue of the moral status of animals has always been debated. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to review and to present a historical summary of the current laws, to guide researchers who wish to use animal models in otolaryngology research. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Research on the medline database. RESULTS: For many years there were no laws ruling the use of animals in scientific experimentation in Brazil. Standards set by national and international organizations were followed. Recently, Law No. 11.794/08 established procedures for the scientific use of animals. Studies in otolaryngology have used the larynxes of rabbits, pigs, dogs, guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), and mice. There were also studies comparing rabbits, rats, and dogs, rhinoplasty on rabbits, and inner ear studies on rats and guinea pigs (albino). CONCLUSIONS: The researchers involved in scientific work with animals should know the principles of Law 11.794/08 and investigate what animals are appropriate for each area of study in their models. Otolaryngologists, especially those dedicated to research, need to be mindful of the ethical rules regarding the use of animals in their studies.

Implementation of ethics grand rounds in an otolaryngology department.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To create a case-based curriculum designed to teach and discuss the tenets of clinical medical ethics within an otolaryngology department. STUDY DESIGN: Survey-based study in a single-institution, academic otolaryngology department. METHODS: Case-based departmental ethics grand rounds were implemented on a quarterly basis within an academic department of otolaryngology. One-hour sessions were designed to use challenging cases volunteered by clinicians within the department to create a forum for discussion and education about clinical medical ethics. A four-question satisfaction survey was administered to participating clinicians to measure the impact of the program. RESULTS: Five grand rounds were held over 16 months from 2009 to 2011, with four to six cases presented per session. Sessions were well attended and received, with broad coverage of topics and lively discussions. The mean survey score was 18 (median, 19; standard deviation, 2) out of a maximum possible score of 20. When asked if the sessions helped to advance their skills and comfort within the field of medical ethics, 100% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed. A total of 86% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the sessions would change how they practiced medicine in a way that would benefit their patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to successfully implement case-based ethics grand rounds within an otolaryngology department. Participants demonstrated a gratifying level of approval, and a stated desire to implement the principles learned within their clinical practice.