Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 44(5): 475-480, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28877114

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The study's purpose was to assess the pH of the skin of older (aged ≥75 years) incontinent nursing home residents after exposure to an incontinence brief containing spiral-shaped fiber wet with an alkaline solution mimicking urine or fecal pH and compared to skin pH after exposure to an industry standard brief wet with the same solution and various controls. DESIGN: The design was experimental, as conditions were applied to skin and skin pH was measured in random order, and subjects served as their own controls. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: The setting was a Midwestern nonprofit nursing home. The sample was 26 nursing home residents; their mean age was 87 years (SD = 6 years); 77% were female. Most (69%) had urinary incontinence alone, and 31% had dual urinary and fecal incontinence. METHODS: Skin pH was measured in duplicate on 6 areas of the inner thighs and 6 areas of the volar surface of the forearms. Each area was exposed to 1 of 6 conditions applied in random order: an incontinence brief containing spiral-shaped fiber wet with an alkaline solution and one that was dry; a standard incontinence brief (without spiral-shaped fiber) wet with the same alkaline solution and one that was dry; the alkaline solution alone; and normal skin. RESULTS: On both the thighs and the forearms, skin pH was significantly lower (more acidic) after exposure to the incontinence brief containing spiral-shaped fiber wet with an alkaline solution compared to the wet standard brief and all other control conditions (P < .001). On thighs, the mean skin pH was 5.7 (SD = 0.5) after exposure to the wet brief with spiral-shaped fiber versus 6.4 (SD = 0.5) after exposure to the wet standard brief. On forearms, the mean skin pH was 5.3 (SD = 0.4) after exposure to the wet brief with spiral-shaped fiber versus 6.0 (SD = 0.4) after exposure to the wet standard brief. CONCLUSIONS: Incontinence briefs containing a spiral-shaped fiber significantly acidify the pH of the skin exposed to an alkaline solution, while industry standard briefs do not. Since alkaline skin pH is a risk factor for incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD), results suggest that briefs with spiral-shaped fiber may help prevent IAD. Findings encourage further research.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis/etiología , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Pañales para la Incontinencia/clasificación , Pañales para la Incontinencia/normas , Orina/química , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Pañales para la Incontinencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Casas de Salud/organización & administración , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Cuidados de la Piel/enfermería , Incontinencia Urinaria/complicaciones
2.
Health Expect ; 17(2): 186-96, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22390825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT: Most people with urinary incontinence are given limited choice when provided with absorbent products through the British National Health Service (NHS), even though the available range is large. OBJECTIVE: To investigate users' preferences for four disposable designs (inserts, all-in-ones, belted/T-shaped and pull-ups) and towelling washable/reusable products, day and night. DESIGN: Shopping experiment. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling women and men in England with moderate-to-heavy urinary incontinence recruited to a larger trial. INTERVENTION: Participants tested each design and selected products they would prefer with a range of different budgets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Design preferences (rankings); 'purchasing' decisions from designated budgets. Results Eighty-five participants (49 men) tested products, 75 completed the shopping experiment. Inserts, most frequently supplied by the NHS, were ranked second to pull-ups by women and lowest by men. When faced with budget constraints, up to 40% of participants opted to 'mix-and-match' designs. Over 15 different combinations of products were selected by participants in the shopping experiment. Most (91%) stated a willingness to 'top-up' assigned budgets from income to secure preferred designs. DISCUSSION: Participants displayed diverse preferences. Enabling user choice of absorbent product design through individual budgets could improve satisfaction of consumers and efficiency of allocation of limited NHS resources. CONCLUSION: Recent policy for the NHS seeks to provide consumers with more control in their care. Extension of the concept of individual budgets to continence supplies could be feasible and beneficial for patients and provide better value-for-money within the NHS. Further research is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Pañales para la Incontinencia/clasificación , Pañales para la Incontinencia/economía , Prioridad del Paciente , Medicina Estatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Incontinencia Urinaria/economía , Adulto , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos
3.
Br J Nurs ; 14(5): 265-6, 268-9, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15902040

RESUMEN

Urinary incontinence is becoming an increasingly common problem for older men and women living in the community. It can have a deleterious effect on quality of life and, although advances have been made in treatments and therapies for this condition, there is still confusion over selection of continence products. This article will explore the problems associated with product selection and discuss alternative advice.


Asunto(s)
Pañales para la Incontinencia/clasificación , Pañales para la Incontinencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Incontinencia Urinaria/enfermería , Anciano , Lechos , Dermatitis por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis por Contacto/enfermería , Diseño de Equipo , Equipo Reutilizado , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Pañales para la Incontinencia/efectos adversos , Pañales para la Incontinencia/economía , Masculino , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Úlcera por Presión/enfermería , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Cuidados de la Piel/instrumentación , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Cuidados de la Piel/enfermería , Reino Unido , Incontinencia Urinaria/economía
4.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H ; 217(4): 233-41, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12885193

RESUMEN

A wide range of continence products is available, and this paper focuses on products to prevent incontinence (such as urinals and commodes) and to contain or manage urinary incontinence (such as absorbent pads, penile sheaths and urethral catheters). Drawing on results from published clinical evaluations at the Continence Product Evaluation Network at UCL and at other centres, the strengths and limitations of the major categories of incontinence products currently on the market are reviewed. It is concluded that, although products for continence have improved considerably over the last 20 years, there is considerable scope for the designer and engineer to improve on current products.


Asunto(s)
Pañales para la Incontinencia/clasificación , Cateterismo Urinario/instrumentación , Incontinencia Urinaria/prevención & control , Incontinencia Urinaria/rehabilitación , Inglaterra , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Pañales para la Incontinencia/economía , Pañales para la Incontinencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica , Cuartos de Baño/economía , Cateterismo Urinario/economía , Cateterismo Urinario/estadística & datos numéricos , Incontinencia Urinaria/terapia
5.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H ; 217(4): 243-51, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12885194

RESUMEN

The background and evolution of absorbent disposable hygiene products is discussed. The current technology used to produce disposable hygiene products such as baby diapers, feminine hygiene products and adult incontinence management products is shown to have a number of manufacturing and in-use problems. Alternative technologies, such as multilayer composite webs offer the opportunity to achieve better product weight control, and therefore better control over the other related properties, reduced raw material waste and improved functional characteristics. There are still problems to be resolved when using such composite materials, but the potential of these new technologies has now been established.


Asunto(s)
Equipos Desechables/clasificación , Equipos Desechables/tendencias , Pañales para la Incontinencia/clasificación , Pañales para la Incontinencia/tendencias , Incontinencia Urinaria/rehabilitación , Diseño de Equipo , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Materiales Manufacturados/clasificación , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica , Estados Unidos , Incontinencia Urinaria/terapia
6.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 26(4): 207-8, 210-3, 1999 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10476176

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We examined the use and cost of incontinence pads and the relationship to factors such as age, duration of incontinence, diurnal frequency, incontinence severity indices, urodynamic diagnosis, and quality of life. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Three hundred fifteen women with urinary incontinence who volunteered to participate in 1 of 3 incontinence studies (behavioral intervention, estrogen supplementation, or surgery) were analyzed. Subjects were community-dwelling women aged 45 years and older living in 3 cities in the southeastern United States. METHODS: Pad use was recorded on a daily diary. The type of pads used was reported on the history. Average price of pad types was assessed at local stores and reported in 1995 dollars. Statistical comparisons used nonparametric methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of pads used per week and annual cost of pads in 1995 dollars. RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent of subjects used pads at baseline. Median cost per year for the entire cohort was $46 (interquartile range $3-$138). For pad users, median annual cost was $76 (interquartile range $36-$177), with costs being greater for women with detrusor instability than those with pure genuine stress incontinence (median $135-$138 versus $63). This increased cost was likely associated with the greater use of special incontinence products among women with detrusor instability. For the entire cohort, cost and usage did not differ by urodynamic diagnosis. Cost and pad usage were significantly associated with number of incontinent episodes and quality of life, but not with age, pad weight, or duration of incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of incontinent women who sought treatment used absorbent pads at least once per week, with menstrual pads being the most common type of pad. The annual cost of pad usage was not as high as in previous estimates.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pañales para la Incontinencia/economía , Pañales para la Incontinencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Incontinencia Urinaria/economía , Incontinencia Urinaria/enfermería , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Pañales para la Incontinencia/clasificación , Pañales para la Incontinencia/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Incontinencia Urinaria/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Urinaria/psicología , Urodinámica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA