Weaning failure due to isolated residual diaphragmatic paralysis after cervical spinal cord ischemia following aortic surgery- a case report.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction can lead to dyspnea and recurrent respiratory failure. In rare cases, it may result from high cervical spinal cord ischemia (SCI) due to anterior spinal artery syndrome (ASAS). We present a case of a patient experiencing persistent isolated diaphragmatic paralysis after SCI at level C3/C4 following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Kommerell's diverticulum. This is, to our knowledge, the first documented instance of a patient fully recovering from tetraplegia due to SCI while still exhibiting ongoing bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient, a 67-year-old male, presented to the Vascular Surgery Department for surgical treatment of symptomatic Kommerell's diverticulum in an aberrant right subclavian artery. After successful surgery in two stages, the patient presented with respiratory insufficiency and flaccid tetraparesis consistent with anterior spinal artery syndrome with maintained sensibility of all extremities. A computerized tomography scan (CT) revealed a high-grade origin stenosis of the left vertebral artery, which was treated by angioplasty and balloon-expandable stenting. Consecutively, the tetraparesis immediately resolved, but weaning remained unsuccessful requiring tracheostomy. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a residual bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. A repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 14 days after vertebral artery angioplasty confirmed SCI at level C3/C4. The patient was transferred to a pulmonary clinic with weaning center for further recovery. CONCLUSIONS: This novel case highlights the need to consider diaphragmatic paralysis due to SCI as a cause of respiratory failure in patients following aortic surgery. Diaphragmatic paralysis may remain as an isolated residual in these patients.

Management of Diaphragm Paralysis and Eventration.

An elevated diaphragm may be due to eventration or paralysis. Diaphragm elevation is often asymptomatic and found incidentally on imaging. Fluoroscopic testing can be used to differentiate eventration (no paradoxic motion) from paralysis (paradoxic motion). Regardless of etiology, a diaphragm plication is indicated in all symptomatic patients with an elevated diaphragm. Plication can be approached either from a thoracic or abdominal approach, though most thoracic surgeons perform minimally invasive thoracoscopic plication. The goal of plication is to improve lung volumes and decrease paradoxic elevation of the hemidiaphragm. Diaphragm plication is safe, has excellent outcomes, and is associated with symptom improvement.

[Quality of life in patients with postoperative unilateral diaphragm relaxation]. / Kachestvo zhizni patsientov s odnostoronnei relaksatsiei diafragmy posle khirurgicheskogo lecheniya.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of life before and after video-assisted thoracoscopic plication of relaxed dome of diaphragm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 17 patients operated on for unilateral relaxation of diaphragm. We analyzed quality of life in preoperative period, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery using the SF-36 and EuroQ-5D-5L questionnaires. To assess the impact of abnormality on respiratory function, we estimated diaphragm position, spirometry data and SGRQ scores. RESULTS: FVC increased by 16.5% after 1 month, 19.5% after 6 months and 20.1% after 12 months. In addition, FEV1 significantly increased (by 12.6% after 1 month, 10.1% after 6 months and 12.7% after 12 months). Mean values of diaphragm elevation in postoperative period decreased by 25.5-25.6%. According to the SF-36 and EuroQ-5D-5L questionnaires, physical and psychological health components significantly increased within a month after surgical treatment. According to the SGRQ questionnaire, influence of disease on overall status decreased a month after surgery as evidences by lower total score (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Objective and survey data revealed significant improvement in quality of life after surgery. A trend towards higher quality of life was demonstrated by all questionnaires in a month after surgery.

Cervical Spine Stenosis Causing Diaphragmatic Paralysis: A Case Study and Narrative Review of Clinical Presentations and Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report and narrative review. OBJECTIVE: To explore the therapeutic role of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of diaphragmatic paralysis secondary to spinal cord and nerve root compression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Phrenic nerve dysfunction due to central or neuroforaminal stenosis is a rare yet unappreciated etiology of diaphragmatic paralysis and chronic dyspnea. Surgical spine decompression, diaphragmatic pacing, and intensive physiotherapy are potential treatment options with varying degrees of evidence. METHODS: The case of a 70-year-old male with progressive dyspnea, reduced hemi-diaphragmatic excursion, and C3-C7 stenosis, who underwent a microscopic foraminotomy is discussed. Literature review (MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar) identified 19 similar reports and discussed alternative treatments and outcomes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Phrenic nerve root decompression and improvement in neuromonitoring signals were observed intraoperatively. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated, and after 15 months, he experienced significant symptomatic improvement and minor improvement in hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis and pulmonary function tests. All case reports of patients treated with spinal decompression showed symptomatic and/or functional improvement, while one of the 2 patients treated with physiotherapy showed improvement. More studies are needed to further describe the course and outcomes of these interventions, but early identification and spinal decompression can be an effective treatment. OCEBM LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-4.

A porcine model of postoperative hemi-diaphragmatic paresis to evaluate a unilateral diaphragmatic pacemaker.

Unilateral phrenic nerve damage is a dreaded complication in congenital heart surgery. It has deleterious effects in neonates and children with uni-ventricular circulation. Diaphragmatic palsy, caused by phrenic nerve damage, impairs respiratory function, especially in new-borns, because their respiration depends on diaphragmatic contractions. Furthermore, Fontan patients with passive pulmonary perfusion are seriously affected by phrenic nerve injury, because diaphragmatic contraction augments pulmonary blood flow. Diaphragmatic plication is currently employed to ameliorate the negative effects of diaphragmatic palsy on pulmonary perfusion and respiratory mechanics. This procedure attenuates pulmonary compression by the abdominal contents. However, there is no contraction of the plicated diaphragm and consequently no contribution to the pulmonary blood flow. Hence, we developed a porcine model of unilateral diaphragmatic palsy in order to evaluate a diaphragmatic pacemaker. Our illustrated step-by-step description of the model generation enables others to replicate and use our model for future studies. Thereby, it might contribute to investigation and advancement of potential improvements for these patients.

[Infraclavicular block for elbow surgery in a patient with pneumonectomy: Case report]. / Pnömonektomili bir hastada dirsek cerrahisi için infraklavikular blok uygulamasi: Olgu sunumu.

Diaphragmatic paralysis is one of the most important complications of upper extremity blocks and therefore limits the use of these blocks in patients with impaired respiratory functions. The appropriate block type should be selected by evaluating the location of the surgery and the risks of diaphragmatic paralysis of various blocks. In this case report, we aimed to evaluate the peripheral nerve blocks associated with diaphragmatic paralysis by presenting the anesthesia management of a patient with pneumonectomy planned for elbow arthroplasty due to elbow luxation.

Proof of concept of an accelerometer as a trigger for unilateral diaphragmatic pacing: a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis in patients with univentricular heart is a known complication after pediatric cardiac surgery. Because diaphragmatic excursion has a significant influence on perfusion of the pulmonary arteries and hemodynamics in these patients, unilateral loss of function leads to multiple complications. The current treatment of choice, diaphragmatic plication, does not lead to a full return of function. A unilateral diaphragmatic pacemaker has shown potential as a new treatment option. In this study, we investigated an accelerometer as a trigger for a unilateral diaphragm pacemaker (closed-loop system). METHODS: Seven pigs (mean weight 20.7 ± 2.25 kg) each were implanted with a customized accelerometer on the right diaphragmatic dome. Accelerometer recordings (mV) of the diaphragmatic excursion of the right diaphragm were compared with findings using established methods (fluoroscopy [mm]; ultrasound, M-mode [cm]). For detection of the amplitude of diaphragmatic excursions, the diaphragm was stimulated with increasing amperage by a cuff electrode implanted around the right phrenic nerve. RESULTS: Results with the different techniques for measuring diaphragmatic excursions showed correlations between accelerometer and fluoroscopy values (correlation coefficient 0.800, P < 0.001), accelerometer and ultrasound values (0.883, P < 0.001), and fluoroscopy and ultrasound values (0.816, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The accelerometer is a valid method for detecting diaphragmatic excursion and can be used as a trigger for a unilateral diaphragmatic pacemaker.

A comparison of short-term outcomes following robotic-assisted vs. open transthoracic diaphragm plication.

Diaphragm paralysis and eventration are rare conditions in adults. Symptomatic patients may benefit from surgical plication of the elevated hemidiaphragm. The objective of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and length of stay following robotic-assisted vs. open diaphragm plication. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted that identified patients undergoing unilateral hemidiaphragm plication from 5/2008 to 12/2020. The first RATS plication was performed in 11/2018. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and outcomes were compared between RATS and open approach. One hundred patients underwent diaphragm plication, including thirty-nine (39.0%) RATS and sixty-one (61.0%) open cases. Patients undergoing RATS diaphragm plication were older (64 years vs. 55 years, p = 0.01) and carried a higher burden of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index: 2.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.02). The RATS group had longer median operative times (146 min vs. 99 min, p < 0.01), but shorter median hospital length of stays (3.0 days vs. 6.0 days, p < 0.01). There was a non-significant trend toward a decreased rate of 30-day postoperative complications (20.5% RATS vs. 32.8% open, p = 0.18) and 30-day unplanned readmissions (7.7% RATS vs. 9.8% open, p > 0.99). RATS is a technically feasible and safe option for performing diaphragm plications. This approach increases the surgical candidacy of older patients with a higher burden of comorbid disease without increasing complication rates, while reducing length of hospital stay.

Plication for diaphragm paralysis after paediatric cardiac surgery: a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: Diaphragm paralysis is a well-known complication following surgery for CHDs, which increases morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay as well as costs. Herein, we present our experience with diaphragm plication following paralysis of the phrenic nerve encountered after paediatric cardiac surgery. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 23 diaphragm plications in 20 patients who underwent paediatric cardiac surgery between January 2012 and January 2022. The patients were carefully selected based on aetiology and a combination of clinical manifestation and chest imaging characteristics including chest X-ray, ultrasonography, and fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Twenty-three successful plications were performed in 20 patients (15 males and 5 females) out of a total of 1938 operations performed in our centre. Mean age and body weight were 18.2 ± 17.1 months and 8.3 ± 3.7 kg, respectively. The period between the cardiac surgery and diaphragmatic plication was 18.7 ± 15.1 days. The highest incidence of diaphragm paralysis was encountered in systemic to pulmonary artery shunt patients with 7 out of 152 patients (4.6%). Any mortality was not encountered during a mean follow-up period of 4.3 ± 2.6 years. CONCLUSIONS: Early results of plication of the diaphragm following phrenic nerve palsy in symptomatic patients who underwent paediatric cardiac surgery are encouraging. Evaluation of the diaphragmatic function should be a routine part of post-operative echocardiography. Diaphragm paralysis may be a consequence of dissection, contusion, stretching, and thermal injury both in terms of hypothermia and hyperthermia.

Robotic diaphragm plication: functional and surgical outcomes of a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragm plication remains the only effective treatment for diaphragm paralysis. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) diaphragm plication combines advantages of open and thoracoscopic techniques. We present our experiences focussing on lung-function improvement and surgical outcome. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study with comparative analysis, perioperative data of all patients who underwent RATS or thoracoscopic (VATS) diaphragm plication between 2015 and 2022 at our institution were assessed. Functional outcome was analysed with pre- and postoperative pulmonary function tests in sitting and supine position. RESULTS: We included 43 diaphragm plications, of which 31 were performed via RATS. Morbidity in the RATS- and VATS-cohort were 13 and 8%, respectively (p = 0.64), without any major complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III, 0%). Surgical time for RATS diaphragm plication was reduced drastically with a median operating time for the first 16 patients of 136 min (range 84-185) and 84 min (range 56-122) for the most recent 15 patients (p < 0.0001). Pulmonary function testing after RATS-plication showed a mean increase in vital capacity (VC) of 9% (SD 8, p < 0.0001) and of 7% (SD 9, p = 0.0009) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) when sitting and 9% (SD 8, p < 0.0001) for VC as well as 10% (SD 8, p = 0.0001) for FEV1 when in supine position. CONCLUSION: RATS diaphragm plication is a very safe and feasible approach, yielding good results in improving patients' pulmonary function. Further studies are required to elucidate possible advantages over VATS or open approaches.

[Robotic Diaphragm Plication]. / Roboterassistierte thorakoskopische Zwerchfellraffung.

Acquired unilateral hemidiaphragm elevation is characterised by dyspnoea, which is typically aggravated when lying down, bending over or during swimming. The most common causes are idiopathic or due to injury to the phrenic nerve during cervical or cardio-thoracic surgery. To date, surgical diaphragm plication remains the only effective treatment. The aim of the procedure is to plicate the diaphragm to restore its tension and thus improve breathing mechanics, increase the available space for the lung and reduce compression from abdominal organs. In the past, various techniques using open and minimally invasive approaches have been described. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic diaphragm plication combines the advantages of a minimally invasive approach with excellent visualisation and freedom of movement. It was shown to be a safe technique which is easy to establish and can significantly improve pulmonary function.

Diaphragm Plication: Evaluation and Technique.

Diaphragmatic paralysis is an elevation of the diaphragm caused by a lesion along the neuromuscular axis and may be either bilateral or unilateral. Most commonly, paralysis is unilateral and iatrogenic in nature. Symptoms of this disease may be life-limiting, and when conservative measures fail, surgical therapy may be of significant benefit to patients. With the advent of robotic minimally invasive techniques, diaphragm plication can be a useful therapy for patients with resolution of symptoms, reduced length of hospitalization, and quickened recovery. This article provides an overview of the disease, diagnosis, and current therapies including robotic techniques.

Results of the Diaphragmatic Plication Database: 10 Years' Experience.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis or paresis (UDP) in adults is an often overlooked disease which relevantly impairs the patient's lung function and quality of life. Particularly in idiopathic UDP, there is no evidence for conservative therapy and only little evidence for surgical therapy. METHODS: The method involves retrospective single-center analysis of patients with UDP persistent for at least 1 year who were operated by diaphragmatic resection, plication, and augmentation with a polypropylene mesh. The patients were tested for lung and diaphragmatic function, six-minute walk test (6MWT), and blood gas analysis before, 3 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients received surgery for UDP. The most frequent reasons for UDP were idiopathic (67%), iatrogenic (mainly cardiac and cervical spine surgery; 24%), and trauma (9%). The mean operation time was 84 ± 24 minutes, the length of hospital stay 8.4 ± 3.9 days, chest tubes were removed after 11.7 ± 4.1 days. Overall morbidity was 42%, mortality 0%. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in supine position improved by 12.4% absolute, vital capacity by 11.8% absolute, and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure by 1.4 kPa 12 months after surgery (p <0.001 each). Total lung capacity increased by 6.8% absolute at 12 months (p = 0.001) The 6MWT distance improved by 45.9 m at 3 months and 50.9 m at 12 months (p = 0.001, each). CONCLUSION: Surgical therapy for UDP is highly effective in the long term. The superiority over conservative treatments needs to be evaluated prospectively with standardized physiotherapeutic protocols. FEV1 in supine position and 6MWT are easy to perform tests and represent statistically and patient-relevant outcomes.

Diaphragmatic paralysis post COVID-19 treated with robot-assisted plication reinforced with acellular dermal matrix: a report of two cases.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to be a disease of global importance, with an increasing array of sequelae attributed to infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. One such complication that has been rarely documented thus far is diaphragmatic dysfunction. Here, we report the cases of 2 individuals who developed diaphragmatic paralysis post COVID-19, which failed to respond to conservative management. Both patients proceeded to undergo robot-assisted thoracoscopic plication of the diaphragm reinforced with a bovine acellular dermal matrix. In both cases, there was significant improvement in symptomatology, namely dyspnoea and fatigue. We conclude that robot-assisted diaphragmatic plication should be considered for the treatment of refractory diaphragmatic paralysis post COVID-19.

Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction Secondary to Cervical Neuroforaminal Stenosis: A Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Phrenic nerve dysfunction has been associated with cervical neuroforaminal stenosis in limited case reports and case-controlled studies. It is unclear if magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine should be included in the workup of patients with pulmonary dysfunction. A systematic review of the current literature was conducted on the topic to provide an outline of the body of knowledge and some guidance for neurosurgeons that receive these patient referrals. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted through the PubMed database to identify articles related to phrenic nerve dysfunction secondary to cervical stenosis. RESULTS: A total of 12 case reports were found. The median subject age was 64 years, 11 were male. Presenting symptoms included shortness of breath (n = 9), radiculopathy (n = 7), myelopathy (n = 5), reduced pulmonary function (n = 6), weakness (n = 4), and neck pain (n = 5). Ten of these patients underwent surgical intervention, all having improvements in their pulmonary and neurological symptoms at follow-up ranging from 10 days to 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical stenosis, resulting in neuroforaminal stenosis, may be related to phrenic nerve dysfunction in select patients with idiopathic diaphragmatic paralysis or pulmonary dysfunction. Surgical decompression improves pulmonary and neurological symptoms.

Diaphragm plication using a subcostal approach as an alternative to a thoracotomy.

Diaphragm paralysis is a rare complication in pediatric heart surgery (0.28%-5.6%, depending on the procedure). When unilateral paralysis happens in adults, it is rarely symptomatic. However, it can cause respiratory distress syndrome when it happens in newborn or young children. The clinical diagnosis comes with a failure to wean from ventilation. The chest X-ray shows the ascension of the concerned hemidiaphragm. The goal of the surgical treatment is to pull down the paralyzed diaphragm and to increase the ventilating capacity. The classical surgical approach is a posterior-lateral thoracotomy in the 5th intercostal space of the concerned paralyzed hemidiaphragm. This approach has several drawbacks such as requiring drainage, reopening the chest after heart surgery, the high level of pain, and the cosmetic side effects. The subcostal approach is a good alternative because it is less time- consuming, it does not require any drainage, and it is less painful. This video-tutorial describes the abdominal approach and provides its advantages compared to a thoracotomy.

Minimally Invasive Diaphragm Plication for Acquired Unilateral Diaphragm Paralysis: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Diaphragm paralysis is a relatively uncommon entity that can be both congenital and acquired in nature. While commonly asymptomatic, it can also cause a significant decrease in pulmonary function and reserve, particularly in patients with underlying pulmonary diseases. Our aim was to summarize the current literature regarding the minimally invasive techniques used in the surgical correction of acquired diaphragm paralysis via traditional and robotic minimally invasive approaches. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of available literature using the Cochrane methodology and reported findings according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. Results: A total of 6,561 citations were identified through initial database and reference searches, of which 90 articles met the inclusion criteria for review. After further assessment, 33 appropriate full-text studies were selected for the review. Of the selected publications, the majority represented case reports and single-center retrospective studies with level of evidence 4. Only 1 level 2b study (individual cohort study) was identified, comparing minimally invasive and open approaches. Conclusions: Each of the minimally invasive approaches has its unique benefits and disadvantages, which are summarized and delineated in this article. Ultimately, no preferred method of diaphragm plication for diaphragm paralysis can be recommended at this time based on clinical data. The choice of procedure and surgical approach continues to be selected based on the surgeon's experience and preference.

Robotic-assisted diaphragmatic plication: Improving safety and effectiveness in the treatment of diaphragmatic paralysis.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic plication can be performed with various surgical approaches. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted plication. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent diaphragmatic plication from 2017 to 2021. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent 20 operations, 11 of which were performed with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and 9 with open transthoracic approach. RATS was associated with shorter operating time (80 vs. 120 min; p = 0.04), less blood loss (20 vs. 100 ml; p = 0.01), shorter chest-drain duration (1 vs. 3 days; p = 0.01), and shorter length of stay (3 vs. 7 days; p = 0.04). The median grade in the Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale improved from four to two in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted diaphragmatic plication is a safe procedure that can significantly improve dyspnoea and is associated with shorter hospitalisation compared to open approach.

Thoracoscopic Radial Diaphragm Plication.

In appropriately selected patients diaphragm plication improves quality of life by alleviating dyspnea and allowing patients to return to their routine activities. Many plication techniques exist, but the optimal surgical approach remains unclear. We report our experience with a minimally invasive radial diaphragm plication technique. It offers 2 distinct advantages: (1) suture placement avoids the phrenic nerve fibers, allowing for potential nerve recovery, and (2) the interrupted radial sutures improve the distribution of tension along the flaccid muscle and may achieve a more durable repair.