Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 528
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 495, 2024 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649915

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since 2005, the healthcare system in Ethiopia has implemented policies to promote the provision of free maternal healthcare services. The primary goal of these policies is to enhance the accessibility of maternity care for women from various socioeconomic backgrounds. Additionally, the aim is to increase the utilization of maternity services, such as institutional deliveries, by removing financial obstacles that pregnant women may face. Even though maternity services are free of charge. The hidden cost has unquestionably been a key obstacle in seeking and utilizing health care services. Significant payments due to delivery services could create a heavy economic burden on households. OBJECTIVES: To determine the hidden cost of hospital-based delivery and associated factors among postpartum women attending public hospitals in Gamo zone, southern Ethiopia 2023. METHODS: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 411 postpartum women in Gamo Zone Public Health Hospitals from December 1, 2022, to January 30, 2023. The systematic sampling technique was applied to reach study units. Data was collected using the Kobo Toolbox Data Collection Tool and exported to SPSS statistical software version 27 for analysis. Simple linear regression and multiple linear regression were done to see the association of variables. The significance level was declared at a P-value < 0.05 in the final model. RESULT: The median hidden cost of hospital-based delivery was 1142 Ethiopian birr (ETB), with a range (Q) of 2262 (504-2766) ETB. Monthly income of the family (ß = 0.019), obstetrics complications (ß = 0.033), distance from the health facility (ß = 0.003), and mode of delivery (ß = 0.072), were positively associated with the hidden cost of hospital-based delivery. While, rural residence (ß = -0.041) was negatively associated with the outcome variable. CONCLUSION: This study showed the hidden cost of hospital based delivery was relatively high. Residence, monthly income of the family, obstetric complications, mode of delivery, and distance from the health facility were statistically significant. It is important to take these factors into account when designing health intervention programs and hospitals should prioritize the availability of essential drugs and medical supplies within their facilities to address direct medical costs in hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Femenino , Etiopía , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Embarazo , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Periodo Posparto , Adolescente , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 439, 2023 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37316790

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Skilled Birth Attendance (SBA) is important in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targets 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.1. Ghana has made steady progress in SBA, yet, unsupervised deliveries still occur. The introduction of the Free Maternal Health Care Policy under the National Health Insurance Scheme (FMHCP under the NHIS) has improved the uptake of SBA but with some implementation challenges. This narrative review sought to explore the factors influencing the FMHCP under the NHIS provision for skilled delivery services in Ghana. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted of databases including PubMed, Popline, Science direct, BioMed Central, Scopus and Google scholar for peer reviewed articles as well as grey articles from other relevant sources, published between 2003 and 2021 on factors influencing FMHCP/NHIS provision for skilled delivery services in Ghana. Keywords used in the literature search were in various combinations for the different databases. The articles were screened to determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality was assessed using a published critical appraisal checklist. A total of 516 articles were retrieved for initial screening based on their titles, of which 61 of them, were further screened by reading their abstracts and full text. Of this number, 22 peer-reviewed and 4 grey articles were selected for the final review based on their relevance. RESULTS: The study revealed that the FMHCP under the NHIS does not cover the full costs associated with skilled delivery and low socioeconomic status of households affects SBA. Also, funding and sustainability, hinders the quality-of-service delivery offered by the policy. CONCLUSION: For Ghana to achieve the SDGs above and further improve SBA, the cost associated with skilled delivery should be fully covered by the NHIS. Also, the government and the key stakeholders involved in the policy implementation, must put in place measures that will enhance the operation and the financial sustainability of the policy.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Servicios de Salud Materna , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Ghana , Política de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Partería , Parto Obstétrico/economía
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 5(5): 100917, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36882126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In contrast to other high-resource countries, the United States has experienced increases in the rates of severe maternal morbidity. In addition, the United States has pronounced racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity, especially for non-Hispanic Black people, who have twice the rate as non-Hispanic White people. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether the racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity extended beyond the rates of these complications to include disparities in maternal costs and lengths of stay, which could indicate differences in the case severity. STUDY DESIGN: This study used California's linkage of birth certificates to inpatient maternal and infant discharge data for 2009 to 2011. Of the 1.5 million linked records, 250,000 were excluded because of incomplete data, for a final sample of 1,262,862. Cost-to-charge ratios were used to estimate costs from charges (including readmissions) after adjusting for inflation to December 2017. Mean diagnosis-related group-specific reimbursement was used to estimate physician payments. We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition of severe maternal morbidity, including readmissions up to 42 days after delivery. Adjusted Poisson regression models estimated the differential risk of severe maternal morbidity for each racial or ethnic group, compared with the non-Hispanic White group. Generalized linear models estimated the associations of race and ethnicity with costs and length of stay. RESULTS: Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other race or ethnicity patients all had higher rates of severe maternal morbidity than non-Hispanic White patients. The largest disparity was between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients, with unadjusted overall rates of severe maternal morbidity of 1.34% and 2.62%, respectively (adjusted risk ratio, 1.61; P<.001). Among patients with severe maternal morbidity, the adjusted regression estimates showed that non-Hispanic Black patients had 23% (P<.001) higher costs (marginal effect of $5023) and 24% (P<.001) longer hospital stays (marginal effect of 1.4 days) than non-Hispanic White patients. These effects changed when cases, such as cases where a blood transfusion was the only indication of severe maternal morbidity, were excluded, with 29% higher costs (P<.001) and 15% longer length of stay (P<.001). For other racial and ethnic groups, the increases in costs and length of stay were smaller than those observed for non-Hispanic Black patients, and many were not significantly different from non-Hispanic White patients. Hispanic patients had higher rates of severe maternal morbidity than non-Hispanic White patients; however, Hispanic patients had significantly lower costs and length of stay than non-Hispanic White patients. CONCLUSION: There were racial and ethnic differences in the costs and length of stay among patients with severe maternal morbidity across the groupings that we examined. The differences were especially large for non-Hispanic Black patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced twice the rate of severe maternal morbidity; in addition, the higher relative costs and longer lengths of stay for non-Hispanic Black patients with severe maternal morbidity support greater case severity in that population. These findings suggest that efforts to address racial and ethnic inequities in maternal health need to consider differences in case severity in addition to the differences in the rates of severe maternal morbidity and that these differences in case severity merit additional investigation.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Morbilidad , Madres , Gravedad del Paciente , Grupos de Población en Estados Unidos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Asiático Americano Nativo Hawáiano y de las Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Certificado de Nacimiento , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , California/epidemiología , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Poblaciones Minoritarias, Vulnerables y Desiguales en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos de Población en Estados Unidos/etnología , Grupos de Población en Estados Unidos/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Am J Perinatol ; 40(3): 290-296, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33878770

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Twin vaginal deliveries (VDs) are often performed in the operating room (OR) given the theoretical risk of conversion to cesarean delivery (CD) for the aftercoming twin. We aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of performing VDs for twin gestations in the labor and delivery room (LDR) versus OR. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision-analysis model that compared the costs and effectiveness of two strategies of twin deliveries undergoing a trial of labor: (1) intended delivery in the LDR and 2) delivery in the OR. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess strength and validity of the model. Primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) defined as cost needed to gain 1 quality-adjusted life year (QALY). RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, where 7% of deliveries resulted in conversion to CD for twin B, attempting to deliver twins in the LDR was the most cost-effective strategy. For every QALY gained by delivering in the OR, 243,335 USD would need to be spent (ICER). In univariate sensitivity analyses, the most cost-effective strategy shifted to delivering in the OR when the following was true: (1) probability of successful VD was less than 86%, (2) probability of neonatal morbidity after emergent CD exceeded 3.5%, (3) cost of VD in an LDR exceeded 10,500 USD, (4) cost of CD was less than 10,000 USD, or (5) probability of neonatal death from emergent CD exceeded 2.8%. Assuming a willingness to pay of 100,000 USD per neonatal QALY gained, attempted VD in the LDR was cost effective in 51% of simulations in the Monte Carlo analysis. CONCLUSION: Twin VDs in the LDR are cost effective based on current neonatal outcome data, taking into account gestational age and associated morbidity. Further investigation is needed to elucidate impact of cost and outcomes on optimal utilization of resources. KEY POINTS: · Cost effectiveness of twin VDs in the LDR versus OR was assessed.. · Twin VDs in the LDR are cost effective based on current neonatal outcome data.. · Attempted VD in the LDR was cost effective in 51% of simulations in the Monte Carlo analysis..


Asunto(s)
Salas de Parto , Parto Obstétrico , Embarazo Gemelar , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Cesárea/economía , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Salas de Parto/economía , Quirófanos/economía
6.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 161(1): 17-25, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36181290

RESUMEN

Most studies comparing vaginal breech delivery (VBD) with cesarean breech delivery (CBD) have been conducted in high-income settings. It is uncertain whether these results are applicable in a low-income setting. To assess the neonatal and maternal mortality and morbidity for singleton VBD compared to CBD in low- and lower-middle-income settings,the PubMed database was searched from January 1, 2000, to January 23, 2020 (updated April 21, 2021). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs comparing singleton VBD with singleton CBD in low- and lower-middle-income settings reporting infant mortality were selected. Two authors independently assessed papers for eligibility and risk of bias. The primary outcome was relative risk of perinatal mortality. Meta-analysis was conducted on applicable outcomes. Eight studies (one RCT, seven observational) (12 510 deliveries) were included. VBD increased perinatal mortality (relative risk [RR] 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-3.91; one RCT, five observational studies, 3289 women) and risk of 5-minute Apgar score below 7 (RR 3.91, 95% CI 1.90-8.04; three observational studies, 430 women) compared to CBD. There was a higher risk of hospitalization and postpartum bleeding in CBD. Most of the studies were deemed to have moderate or serious risk of bias. CBD decreases risk of perinatal mortality but increases risk of bleeding and hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas , Parto Obstétrico , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Presentación de Nalgas/mortalidad , Presentación de Nalgas/cirugía , Presentación de Nalgas/terapia , Cesárea/economía , Cesárea/mortalidad , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/mortalidad , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Infantil , Mortalidad Perinatal , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Morbilidad , Mortalidad Materna , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Int Health ; 15(4): 435-444, 2023 07 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167330

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ending maternal mortality has been a significant global health priority for decades. Many sub-Saharan African countries introduced user fee removal policies to attain this goal and ensure universal access to health facility delivery. However, many women in Nigeria continue to deliver at home. We examined the reasons for home birth in settings with free maternal healthcare in Southwestern and North Central Nigeria. METHODS: We adopted a fully mixed, sequential, equal-status design. For the quantitative study, we drew data from 211 women who reported giving birth at home from a survey of 1227 women of reproductive age who gave birth in the 5 y before the survey. The qualitative study involved six focus group discussions and 68 in-depth interviews. Data generated through the interviews were coded and subjected to inductive thematic analysis, while descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data. RESULTS: Women faced several barriers that limited their use of skilled birth attendants. These barriers operate at multiple levels and could be grouped as economic, sociocultural and health facility-related factors. Despite the user fee removal policy, lack of transportation, birth unpreparedness and lack of money pushed women to give birth at home. Also, sociocultural reasons such as hospital delivery not being deemed necessary in the community, women not wanting to be seen by male health workers, husbands not motivated and husbands' disapproval hindered the use of health facilities for childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that free healthcare does not guarantee universal access to healthcare. Interventions, especially in the Nasarawa state of Nigeria, should focus on the education of mothers on the importance of health facility-based delivery and birth preparedness.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Personal de Salud , Parto Domiciliario , Servicios de Salud Materna , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Huelga de Empleados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Instituciones de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Parto Domiciliario/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Nigeria , Parto , Investigación Cualitativa , Huelga de Empleados/economía , Factores Sexuales , Personal de Salud/economía , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/economía
8.
Health Serv Res ; 57(1): 27-36, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34254295

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To test whether out-of-pocket costs and negotiated hospital prices for childbirth change after enrollment in high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) and whether price effects differ in markets with more hospitals. DATA SOURCES: Administrative medical claims data from 2010 to 2014 from three large commercial insurers with plans in all U.S. states provided by the Health Care Cost Institute (HCCI). STUDY DESIGN: I identify employer groups that switched from non-HDHPs in 1 year to HDHPs in a subsequent year. I estimate enrollees' change in out-of-pocket costs and negotiated hospital prices for childbirth after HDHP switch, relative to a comparison group of employers that do not switch plans. I use a triple-difference design to estimate price changes for enrollees in markets with more hospital choices. Finally, I re-estimate models with hospital-fixed effects. DATA COLLECTION: From the HCCI sample, childbearing women enrolled in an employer-sponsored plan with at least 10 people. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Switching to an HDHP increases out-of-pocket cost $227 (p < 0.001; comparison group base $790) and has no meaningful effect on hospital-negotiated prices (-$26, p = 0.756; comparison group base $5821). HDHP switch is associated with a marginally statistically significant price increase in markets with three or fewer hospitals ($343, p = 0.096; comparison group base $5806) and, relative to those markets, with a price decrease in markets with more than three hospitals (-$512; p = 0.028). Predicted prices decrease from $5702 to $5551 after HDHP switch in markets with more than three hospitals due primarily to lower prices conditional on using the same hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Prices for childbirth in markets with more hospitals decrease after HDHP switch due to lower hospital prices for HDHPs relative to prices at those same hospitals for non-HDHPs. These results reinforce previous findings that HDHPs do not promote price shopping but suggest negotiated prices may be lower for HDHP enrollees.


Asunto(s)
Deducibles y Coseguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Deducibles y Coseguros/economía , Parto Obstétrico/normas , Femenino , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/economía , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Embarazo , Estados Unidos
9.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 705, 2021 Oct 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670514

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is put forward as an alternative, more accurate costing method to calculate the cost of a medical treatment because it allows the assignment of costs directly to patients. The objective of this paper is the application of a time-driven activity-based method in order to estimate the cost of childbirth at a maternal department. Moreover, this study shows how this costing method can be used to outline how childbirth costs vary according to considered patient and disease characteristics. Through the use of process mapping, TDABC allows to exactly identify which activities and corresponding resources are impacted by these characteristics, leading to a more detailed understanding of childbirth cost. METHODS: A prospective cohort study design is performed in a maternity department. Process maps were developed for two types of childbirth, vaginal delivery (VD) and caesarean section (CS). Costs were obtained from the financial department and capacity cost rates were calculated accordingly. RESULTS: Overall, the cost of childbirth equals €1894,12 and is mainly driven by personnel costs (89,0%). Monitoring after birth is the most expensive activity on the pathway, costing €1149,70. Significant cost variations between type of delivery were found, with VD costing €1808,66 compared to €2463,98 for a CS. Prolonged clinical visit (+ 33,3 min) and monitoring (+ 775,2 min) in CS were the main contributors to this cost difference. Within each delivery type, age, parity, number of gestation weeks and education attainment were found to drive cost variations. In particular, for VD an age >  25 years, nulliparous, gestation weeks > 40 weeks and higher education attainment were associated with higher costs. Similar results were found within CS for age, parity and number of gestation weeks. CONCLUSIONS: TDABC is a valuable approach to measure and understand the variability in costs of childbirth and its associated drivers over the full care cycle. Accordingly, these findings can inform health care providers, managers and regulators on process improvements and cost containment initiatives.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/economía , Parto , Adulto , Bélgica , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(8): e2121410, 2021 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34406401

RESUMEN

Importance: When introduced a decade ago, patient-facing price transparency tools had low use rates and were largely not associated with changes in spending. Little is known about how such tools are used by pregnant individuals in anticipation of childbirth, a shoppable service with increasing out-of-pocket spending. Objective: To measure changes over time in the patterns and characteristics of use of a price transparency tool by pregnant individuals, and to identify the association between price transparency tool use, coinsurance, and childbirth spending. Design, Setting, and Participants: This descriptive cross-sectional study of 2 cohorts used data from a US commercial health insurance company that launched a web-based price transparency tool in 2010. Data on all price transparency tool queries for 2 periods (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016) were obtained. The sample included enrollees aged 19 to 45 years who had a delivery episode during 2 periods (November 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012, or November 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016) and were continuously enrolled for the 10 months prior to delivery (N = 253 606). Exposures: Access to a web-based price transparency tool that provided individualized out-of-pocket price estimates for vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were searches on the price transparency tool by delivery mode (vaginal or cesarean), timing (first, second, or third trimester), and individual characteristics (age at childbirth, rurality, pregnancy risk status, coinsurance exposure, area educational attainment, and area median household income). Another outcome was the association of out-of-pocket childbirth spending with price transparency tool use. Results: The sample included 253 606 pregnant individuals, of whom 131 224 (51.7%) were in the 2011 to 2012 cohort and 122 382 (48.3%) were in the 2015 to 2016 cohort. In the 2015 to 2016 cohort, the mean (SD) age was 31 years (5.2 years) and most individuals had coinsurance for delivery (94 251 [77.0%]). Price searching increased from 5.9% in the 2011 to 2012 cohort to 13.0% in the 2015 to 2016 cohort. In the 2015 to 2016 cohort, 43.9% of searchers' first price query was in their first trimester. The adjusted probability of searching was lower for individuals with a high-risk pregnancy due to a previous cesarean delivery (11.5%; 95% CI, 11.0%-12.1%) vs individuals with low-risk pregnancy (13.4%; 95% CI, 12.9%-14.0%). Use increased monotonically with coinsurance, from 9.2% (95% CI, 8.7%-9.8%) among individuals with no coinsurance to 15.0% (95% CI, 14.4%-15.5%) among individuals with 11% or higher coinsurance. After adjusting for covariates, searching was positively associated with out-of-pocket delivery episode spending. Among patients with 11% coinsurance or higher, early and late searchers spent more out of pocket ($59.57 [95% CI, $33.44-$85.96] and $73.33 [95% CI, $32.04-$115.29], respectively), compared with never searchers. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cross-sectional study indicate that the proportion of pregnant individuals who sought price information before childbirth more than doubled within the first 6 years of availability of a price transparency tool. These findings suggest that price information may help individuals anticipate their out-of-pocket childbirth costs.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/tendencias , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Embarazo , Estados Unidos
11.
Ann Glob Health ; 87(1): 75, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34430225

RESUMEN

Background: Rural Indigenous Maya communities in Guatemala have some of the worst obstetrical health outcomes in Latin America, due to widespread discrimination in healthcare and an underfunded public sector. Multiple systems-level efforts to improve facility birth outcomes have been implemented, primarily focusing on early community-based detection of obstetrical complications and on reducing discrimination and improving the quality of facility-level care. However, another important feature of public facility-level care are the out-of-pocket payments that patients are often required to make for care. Objective: To estimate the burden of out-of-pocket costs for public obstetrical care in Indigenous Maya communities in Guatemala. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical record data on obstetrical referrals collected as part of an obstetrical care navigation intervention, which included documentation of out-of-pocket costs by care navigators accompanying patients within public facilities. We compared the median costs for both emergency and routine obstetrical facility care. Findings: Cost data on 709 obstetric referrals from 479 patients were analyzed (65% emergency and 35% routine referrals). The median OOP costs were Q100 (IQR 75-150) [$13 USD] and Q50 (IQR 16-120) [$6.50 USD] for emergency and routine referrals. Costs for transport were most common (95% and 55%, respectively). Costs for medication, supply, laboratory, and imaging costs occurred less frequently. Food and lodging costs were minimal. Conclusion: Out-of-pocket payments for theoretically free public care are a common and important barrier to care for this rural Guatemalan setting. These data add to the literature in Latin American on the barriers to obstetrical care faced by Indigenous and rural women.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Gastos en Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural , Adulto , Femenino , Guatemala , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(11): 879-889, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34240784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess outcomes of delivery hospitalizations, including acute kidney injury (AKI), obstetric and foetal events and resource utilization among pregnant women with kidney transplants compared with pregnant women with no known kidney disease and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stages 3-5. METHOD: Hospitalizations for delivery in the US were identified using the enhanced delivery identification method in the National Inpatient Sample dataset from the years 2009 to 2014. Diagnoses of CKD Stages 3-5, kidney transplantation, along with obstetric events, delivery methods and foetal events were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. Patients with no known kidney disease group were identified by excluding any diagnoses of CKD, end stage kidney disease, and kidney transplant. Multivariable logistic regression accounting for the survey weights and matched regression was conducted to investigate the risk of maternal and foetal complications in women with kidney transplants, compared with women with no kidney transplants and no known kidney disease, and to women with CKD Stages 3-5. RESULT: A total of 5, 408, 215 hospitalizations resulting in deliveries were identified from 2009 to 2014, including 405 women with CKD Stages 3-5, 295 women with functioning kidney transplants, and 5, 405, 499 women with no known kidney disease. Compared with pregnant women with no known kidney disease, pregnant kidney transplant recipients were at higher odds of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR = 3.11, 95% CI [2.26, 4.28]), preeclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP syndrome (OR = 3.42, 95% CI [2.54, 4.60]), preterm delivery (OR = 2.46, 95% CI [1.75, 3.45]), foetal growth restriction (OR = 1.74, 95% CI [1.01, 3.00]) and AKI (OR = 10.46, 95% CI [5.33, 20.56]). There were no significant differences in rates of gestational diabetes or caesarean section. Pregnant women with kidney transplants had 1.30-times longer lengths of stay and 1.28-times higher costs of hospitalization. However, pregnant women with CKD Stages 3-5 were at higher odds of AKI (OR = 5.29, 95% CI [2.41, 11.59]), preeclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP syndrome (OR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.07, 2.76]) and foetal deaths (OR = 3.20, 95% CI [1.06, 10.24]), and had 1.28-times longer hospital stays and 1.37-times higher costs of hospitalization compared with pregnant women with kidney transplant. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with kidney transplant were more likely to experience adverse events during delivery and had longer lengths of stay and higher total charges when compared with women with no known kidney disease. However, pregnant women with moderate to severe CKD were more likely to experience serious complications than kidney transplant recipients.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Recursos en Salud , Hospitalización , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Precios de Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Mujeres Embarazadas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/economía , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Receptores de Trasplantes , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(4): e217491, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33885772

RESUMEN

Importance: Women and families constitute the fastest-growing segments of the homeless population. However, there is limited evidence on whether women experiencing homelessness have poorer childbirth delivery outcomes and higher costs of care compared with women not experiencing homelessness. Objective: To compare childbirth delivery outcomes and costs of care between pregnant women experiencing homelessness vs those not experiencing homelessness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 15 029 pregnant women experiencing homelessness and 308 242 pregnant women not experiencing homelessness who had a delivery hospitalization in 2014. The study used statewide databases that included all hospital admissions in 3 states (ie, Florida, Massachusetts, and New York). Delivery outcomes and delivery-associated costs were compared between pregnant women experiencing homelessness and those not experiencing homelessness cared for at the same hospital (analyzed using the overlap propensity-score weighting method and multivariable regression models with hospital fixed effects). The Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate procedure was used to account for multiple comparisons. Data were analyzed from January 2020 through May 2020. Exposure: Housing status at delivery hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcome variables included obstetric complications (ie, antepartum hemorrhage, placental abnormalities, premature rupture of the membranes, preterm labor, and postpartum hemorrhage), neonatal complications (ie, fetal distress, fetal growth restriction, and stillbirth), delivery method (ie, cesarean delivery), and delivery-associated costs. Results: Among 15 029 pregnant women experiencing homelessness (mean [SD] age, 28.5 [5.9] years) compared with 308 242 pregnant women not experiencing homelessness (mean [SD] age, 29.4 [5.8] years) within the same hospital, those experiencing homelessness were more likely to experience preterm labor (adjusted probability, 10.5% vs 6.7%; adjusted risk difference [aRD], 3.8%; 95% CI, 1.2%-6.5%; adjusted P = .03) and had higher delivery-associated costs (adjusted costs, $6306 vs $5888; aRD, $417; 95% CI, $156-$680; adjusted P = .02) compared with women not experiencing homelessness. Those experiencing homelessness also had a higher probability of placental abnormalities (adjusted probability, 4.0% vs 2.0%; aRD, 1.9%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.5%; adjusted P = .053), although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that women experiencing homelessness, compared with those not experiencing homelessness, who had a delivery and were admitted to the same hospital were more likely to experience preterm labor and incurred higher delivery-associated costs. These findings suggest wide disparities in delivery-associated outcomes between women experiencing homelessness and those not experiencing homelessness in the US. The findings highlight the importance for health care professionals to actively screen pregnant women for homelessness during prenatal care visits and coordinate their care with community health programs and social housing programs to make sure their health care needs are met.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cesárea/economía , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Femenino , Sufrimiento Fetal/economía , Sufrimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/economía , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/economía , Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/economía , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/economía , Parto , Enfermedades Placentarias/economía , Enfermedades Placentarias/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/economía , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/economía , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/epidemiología , Mortinato/economía , Mortinato/epidemiología , Hemorragia Uterina/economía , Hemorragia Uterina/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
15.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 329, 2021 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health facility deliveries are generally associated with improved maternal and child health outcomes. However, in Uganda, little is known about factors that influence use of health facilities for delivery especially in rural areas. In this study, we assessed the factors associated with health facility deliveries among mothers living within the catchment areas of major health facilities in Rukungiri and Kanungu districts, Uganda. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 894 randomly-sampled mothers within the catchment of two private hospitals in Rukungiri and Kanungu districts. Data were collected on the place of delivery for the most recent child, mothers' sociodemographic and economic characteristics, and health facility water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) status. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) for the determinants of health facility deliveries as well as factors associated with private versus public utilization of health facilities for childbirth. RESULTS: The majority of mothers (90.2%, 806/894) delivered in health facilities. Non-facility deliveries were attributed to faster progression of labour (77.3%, 68/88), lack of transport (31.8%, 28/88), and high cost of hospital delivery (12.5%, 11/88). Being a business-woman [APR = 1.06, 95% CI (1.01-1.11)] and belonging to the highest wealth quintile [APR = 1.09, 95% CI (1.02-1.17)] favoured facility delivery while a higher parity of 3-4 [APR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.88-0.99)] was inversely associated with health facility delivery as compared to parity of 1-2. Factors associated with delivery in a private facility compared to a public facility included availability of highly skilled health workers [APR = 1.15, 95% CI (1.05-1.26)], perceived higher quality of WASH services [APR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.04-1.17)], cost of the delivery [APR = 0.85, 95% CI (0.78-0.92)], and availability of caesarean services [APR = 1.13, 95% CI (1.08-1.19)]. CONCLUSION: Health facility delivery service utilization was high, and associated with engaging in business, belonging to wealthiest quintile and having higher parity. Factors associated with delivery in private facilities included health facility WASH status, cost of services, and availability of skilled workforce and caesarean services.


Asunto(s)
Entorno del Parto/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Asistencia al Embarazo y al Parto , Parto Obstétrico , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Instalaciones Privadas , Instalaciones Públicas , Adulto , Centros de Asistencia al Embarazo y al Parto/economía , Centros de Asistencia al Embarazo y al Parto/normas , Estudios Transversales , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Demografía , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Instalaciones Privadas/normas , Instalaciones Privadas/estadística & datos numéricos , Instalaciones Públicas/normas , Instalaciones Públicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Rural/economía , Servicios de Salud Rural/normas , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Uganda/epidemiología
16.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 333, 2021 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902486

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Healthcare costs have substantially increased in recent years, threatening the population health. Obstetric care is a significant contributor to this scenario since it represents 20% of healthcare. The rate of cesarean sections (C-sections) has escalated worldwide. Evidence shows that cesarean delivery is not only more expensive, but it is also linked to poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study assesses which type of delivery is associated with a higher healthcare value in low-risk pregnancies. RESULTS: A total of 9345 deliveries were analyzed. The C-section group had significantly worse rates of breastfeeding in the first hour after delivery (92.57% vs 88.43%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of intensive unit care (ICU) admission both for the mother and the newborn (0.8% vs 0.3%, p = 0.001; 6.7% vs 4.5%, p = 0.0078 respectively), and a higher average cost of hospitalization (BRL14,342.04 vs BRL12,230.03 considering mothers and babies). CONCLUSION: Cesarean deliveries in low-risk pregnancies were associated with a lower value delivery because in addition to being more expensive, they had worse perinatal outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/economía , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Cesárea/economía , Cesárea/métodos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Medición de Riesgo
17.
Natl Vital Stat Rep ; 70(2): 1-51, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33814033

RESUMEN

Objectives-This report presents 2019 data on U.S. births according to a wide variety of characteristics. Trends in fertility patterns and maternal and infant characteristics are described and interpreted. Methods-Descriptive tabulations of data reported on the birth certificates of the 3.75 million births that occurred in 2019 are presented. Data are presented for maternal age, livebirth order, race and Hispanic origin, marital status, tobacco use, prenatal care, source of payment for the delivery, method of delivery, gestational age, birthweight, and plurality. Selected data by mother's state of residence and birth rates by age are also shown. Trend data for 2010 through 2019 are presented for selected items. Trend data by race and Hispanic origin are shown for 2016-2019. Results-A total of 3,747,540 births were registered in the United States in 2019, down 1% from 2018. The general fertility rate declined from 2018 to 58.3 births per 1,000 women aged 15-44 in 2019. The birth rate for females aged 15-19 fell 4% between 2018 and 2019. Birth rates declined for women aged 20-34 and increased for women aged 35-44 for 2018-2019. The total fertility rate declined to 1,706.0 births per 1,000 women in 2019. Birth rates declined for both married and unmarried women from 2018 to 2019. The percentage of women who began prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy rose to 77.6% in 2019; the percentage of all women who smoked during pregnancy declined to 6.0%. The cesarean delivery rate decreased to 31.7% in 2019 (Figure 1). Medicaid was the source of payment for 42.1% of all births in 2019. The preterm birth rate rose for the fifth straight year to 10.23% in 2019; the rate of low birthweight was essentially unchanged from 2018 at 8.31%. Twin and triplet and higher-order multiple birth rates both declined in 2019 compared with 2018.


Asunto(s)
Tasa de Natalidad/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Certificado de Nacimiento , Orden de Nacimiento , Tasa de Natalidad/etnología , Peso al Nacer , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estado Civil/etnología , Estado Civil/estadística & datos numéricos , Edad Materna , Persona de Mediana Edad , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Progenie de Nacimiento Múltiple/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiología , Uso de Tabaco/etnología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
18.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 304(3): 599-608, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33665682

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We aimed to examine the effect of gestational weight gain (GWG) on perinatal outcomes, quality of life (QoL) during pregnancy, and medical costs of childbirth. METHODS: The observational cohort comprised 2210 pregnant women who were classified into three groups based on their pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and GWG in relation to the 2020 Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. The data were collected on perinatal outcomes, urinary incontinence (UI) during pregnancy, changes in sexual function, and medical costs of hospitalization for delivery. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were employed to explore those associations. RESULTS: Only 42.1% of women met the 2020 IOM guidelines. After adjustments for potential confounding factors, women with above-normal GWG had adverse pregnancy outcomes, including a large fetal head circumference and macrosomia, and women with below-normal GWG were more likely to deliver low-birthweight fetuses preterm than women with normal GWG. Only 16.8% of women reported sexual activity during pregnancy. There were not significant differences in sexual activity and satisfaction, or QoL among the three GWG groups. Child-bearing expenses were higher for women with above-normal GWG than for women with normal GWG. Although the child-bearing expenses were higher for the above-normal GWG, the proportion of women with expenses above the median increased according to pre-pregnancy BMI. CONCLUSION: Our results show that inappropriate GWG is associated with a greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes and increased medical expenses for delivery. Healthcare providers are advised to counsel women to maintain their GWG following the 2020 IOM recommendations throughout pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Macrosomía Fetal/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Parto , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Aumento de Peso
19.
Public Health ; 193: 43-47, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33725495

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to address the question that whether out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) on institutional deliveries remained high or reduced over time in India, in particular after the introduction of conditional cash transfer (CCT) incentive programmes such as Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in 2005. STUDY DESIGN: The study presents the trends in average OOPE on institutional deliveries in India, in an effort to evaluate the impact of the JSY programme on it. METHODS: For the purpose, the study used recently released 75th round of National Sample Survey data, 2017/18 about household social consumption (Health) and two of its previous rounds in 2004 and 2014. RESULTS: The results suggest that, except at rural public facilities, the average OOPE for institutional delivery has increased significantly in both rural and urban areas from 2004 to 2017/18, even after adjusting to inflation in the prices. In addition, the results have shown that overall 14 of 33 states for rural public facilities, 20 of 25 states in rural private facilities, 21 of 32 states in urban public facilities and 29 of 32 states in urban private facilities have experienced more than 50% raise in OOPE on institutional delivery during 2004-2017/18, despite JSY incentives. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the current level of JSY incentives will not be sufficient to avoid catastrophic spending on institutional deliveries for the households as the incentives in several states are much less than the state average OOPE per delivery. Thus, there is a need to consider a raise in the state or central contribution for CCT under the JSY programme to reduce the burden of OOPE on institutional deliveries through recently launched Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/tendencias , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , India , Embarazo , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
20.
Trop Med Int Health ; 26(7): 775-788, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33780090

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Caesarean section (CS) can be life-saving for both mother and child, but in Nigeria the CS rate remains low, at 2.7% of births. We aimed to estimate the rate of CS and early neonatal mortality in Nigeria according to obstetric risk and socio-economic background and to identify factors associated with CS. METHODS: We used the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey, encompassing 33 924 live births within the last 5 years, to estimate the CS rate and early neonatal mortality rate (ENMR) by obstetric risk group, informed by the Robson classification. The CS rate and ENMR were assessed within each Robson group and stratified by socio-economic background. Logistic regression analyses were used to explore determinants of CS. RESULTS: Almost three-quarters (72.4%) of all births were to multiparous women, with a singleton baby of normal birthweight, thus a low-risk group similar to Robson 3, and with a CS rate of 1.0%. CS rates in the two high-risk groups (multiple pregnancy and preterm/low birthweight) were low, 7.1% (95% CI: 5.2-9.7) and 1.8 % (95% CI: 1.4-2.4), respectively. The ENMR was particularly high for multiple pregnancy (175 per 1000 live births; 95% CI: 131-230). Greater number of antenatal visits, unwanted pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, household wealth, maternal education, Christians/Others versus Muslims and referral during childbirth were positively associated with CS. CONCLUSION: Inequitable access to CS is not limited to socio-economic determinants, but also related to obstetric risk factors, calling for increased efforts to improve access to CS for high-risk pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/economía , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nigeria , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...