Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vet Dent ; 30(2): 72-6, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24006715

RESUMEN

Imaging of patients with oral cancer is required to determine tumor extension in order to assist in prognosis and surgical planning. Conventional screen-film radiography (SFR) used to be the most common method for oral assessment, but computed tomography (CT) has become more available and is being used for obtaining complementary information. CT examinations eliminate superimposition by acquiring cross-sectional images of the region of interest. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of SFR compared with CT examinations for evaluation of oral masses in dogs. Twenty-one dogs received head and thorax SFR, and pre- and post-contrast head CT. Bony changes were observed in 80.9% and 95.2% of the cases in SFR and CT studies, respectively. Invasion of adjacent structures (i.e. nasal cavity, frontal and sphenoidal sinuses, orbit, maxillary recess, nasopharynx) was observed in only 30% of cases with SFR while CT showed 90.4% involvement. CT is an important preoperative examination modality and is more effective in identifying bone changes and tumor invasion of adjacent structures compared with SFR.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Maxilares/veterinaria , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/veterinaria , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria , Animales , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/veterinaria , Medios de Contraste , Perros , Femenino , Fibrosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrosarcoma/veterinaria , Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Neoplasias Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Melanoma/veterinaria , Cavidad Nasal/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/veterinaria , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias Nasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Nasales/veterinaria , Neoplasias Orbitales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Orbitales/veterinaria , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/veterinaria , Estudios Prospectivos , Seno Esfenoidal/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound ; 50(6): 577-83, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19999339

RESUMEN

Radiographic diagnosis of equine bone disease using digital radiography is prevalent in veterinary practice. However, the diagnostic quality of digital vs. conventional radiography has not been compared systematically. We hypothesized that digital radiography would be superior to film-screen radiography for detection of subtle lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone. Twenty-four third metacarpal bones were collected from horses euthanized for reasons other than orthopedic disease. Bones were dissected free of soft tissue and computed tomography was performed to ensure that no osseous abnormalities were present. Subtle osseous lesions were produced in the dorsal cortex of the third metacarpal bones, and the bones were radiographed in a soft tissue phantom using indirect digital and conventional radiography at standard exposures. Digital radiographs were printed onto film. Three Diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Radiology evaluated the radiographs for the presence or absence of a lesion. Receiver operator characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under these curves were compared to assess the ability of the digital and film-screen radiographic systems to detect lesions. The area under the ROC curves for film-screen and digital radiography were 0.87 and 0.90, respectively (P = 0.59). We concluded that the digital radiographic system was comparable to the film-screen system for detection of subtle lesions of the equine third metacarpal bone.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Óseas/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos del Metacarpo/diagnóstico por imagen , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/normas , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Eutanasia Animal , Caballos , Modelos Animales , Curva ROC , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/veterinaria
3.
Top Companion Anim Med ; 24(1): 20-36, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19410234

RESUMEN

Dental radiology is the core diagnostic modality of veterinary dentistry. Dental radiographs assist in detecting hidden painful pathology, estimating the severity of dental conditions, assessing treatment options, providing intraoperative guidance, and also serve to monitor success of prior treatments. Unfortunately, most professional veterinary training programs provide little or no training in veterinary dentistry in general or dental radiology in particular. Although a technical learning curve does exist, the techniques required for producing diagnostic films are not difficult to master. Regular use of dental x-rays will increase the amount of pathology detected, leading to healthier patients and happier clients who notice a difference in how their pet feels. This article covers equipment and materials needed to produce diagnostic intraoral dental films. A simplified guide for positioning will be presented, including a positioning "cheat sheet" to be placed next to the dental x-ray machine in the operatory. Additionally, digital dental radiograph systems will be described and trends for their future discussed.


Asunto(s)
Odontología/veterinaria , Radiografía Dental Digital/veterinaria , Radiología/instrumentación , Radiología/métodos , Medicina Veterinaria/instrumentación , Animales , Gatos , Odontología/métodos , Perros , Radiografía Dental Digital/instrumentación , Radiografía Dental Digital/métodos , Medicina Veterinaria/métodos , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria
4.
7.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound ; 41(1): 9-18, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10695874

RESUMEN

In conventional radiography systems, it is apparent that only the area immediately around the central x-ray beam can be evaluated accurately. Consequently in some instances, spinal radiography for example, several exposures are needed at various points along the body to create an accurate image for diagnosis. However, if the film and body part are in a concave shape such that the radius of the curve is equal to the film focal distance, the x-ray beam will penetrate the body and strike the film at two-dimensionally right angles in all areas. Using the spine as an example we found the curved technique had three major advantages over the traditional flat technique: lack of distortion, more uniform beam intensity due to a constant focal film distance, and improved resolution at the periphery of the radiograph because of lack of a cross over effect. It was concluded that an accurate evaluation of larger body parts can be made with minimal distortion utilizing the principles of a curved table technique.


Asunto(s)
Perros/anatomía & histología , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Animales , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/instrumentación , Radiografía/instrumentación , Radiografía/veterinaria , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria , Pantallas Intensificadoras de Rayos X/veterinaria
8.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound ; 39(4): 304-8, 1998.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9710131

RESUMEN

Image magnification is inherent in radiography. In digital fluoroscopy, the three components of magnification are geometric, electronic and photographic. In this study, the total magnification factor of a digital imaging system was determined by two methods, 1) comparison of measurements of a known object to its image and 2) calculation of geometric, electronic and photographic magnification from the imaging system specifications. Both methods were employed for various focal-film distances, image intensifier tube modes and laser printer formats. Results of these two methods were different due to the detrimental effect of penumbra on image quality with increasing magnification. If a radiographic image is to be used to approximate object size, then a technique should be used that will minimize magnification. In digital fluoroscopy this is achieved with the shortest object-film distance (assuming a fixed focal-object distance), largest image intensifier mode and greatest number of images per sheet of film.


Asunto(s)
Fluoroscopía/veterinaria , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica , Magnificación Radiográfica/veterinaria , Animales , Electrónica , Rayos Láser , Modelos Lineales , Matemática , Fotograbar/veterinaria , Impresión , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria , Pantallas Intensificadoras de Rayos X/veterinaria
10.
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract ; 22(6): 1279-95, 1992 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1455573

RESUMEN

This article describes the technique of taking intraoral radiographs and developing film. Interpretation of oral radiographs is described. Radiation safety is reviewed. A troubleshooting section is included.


Asunto(s)
Gatos/anatomía & histología , Boca/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Dental/veterinaria , Diente/diagnóstico por imagen , Animales , Protección Radiológica , Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico por imagen , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria
11.
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract ; 8(2): 319-28, 1992 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1643545

RESUMEN

Adequate radiographic evaluation of the horse relevant to purchase examination requires the successful integration of technique, interpretation, and reporting. A thorough knowledge of lameness and disease can be masked by incorrect interpretation resulting from poor-quality films or an incomplete examination. Thus, care must be taken to produce an adequate number of high-quality films on which to base a report, which allows you to describe changes that are present. This information, coupled with your physical examination, other laboratory data, and the knowledge of the expressed use of the horse will allow you to advise prospective owners on the decision that they will ultimately make.


Asunto(s)
Extremidades/diagnóstico por imagen , Pezuñas y Garras/diagnóstico por imagen , Caballos/anatomía & histología , Radiografía/veterinaria , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria , Animales , Radiografía/normas , Restricción Física/veterinaria , Película para Rayos X/normas
12.
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr ; 103(4): 118-20, 1990 Apr 01.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2331246

RESUMEN

The stepwedge, described in part 1 and in other publications, was used for the examination of the POLAROID-Instant Radiographic System. The result showed, that this system is a quite acceptable method for the practitioner. POLAROID-radiographs, in comparison with the classic radiographs, show equal contrast and detail-visibility, but demand a higher radiation dose.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Biológicos , Tecnología Radiológica/veterinaria , Animales , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria
13.
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr ; 103(3): 92-4, 1990 Mar 01.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2317188

RESUMEN

Properly exposed radiographs and under- or overexposed ones were processed differently with regard to temperature and time. Using a step wedge for the objective estimation, the alteration of well-exposed radiographs by neglecting time and temperature control was examined. Further information is given about the possibility to improve the quality of wrongly exposed radiographs by manipulation of the processing, and about the quantity of acceptable radiographs received in this way. Stop bath, fixation bath, wash bath and drying were performed regularly. The result showed, that the only chance to get high quality radiographs is by exact and correct working.


Asunto(s)
Radiografía/veterinaria , Tecnología Radiológica/veterinaria , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria , Animales , Control de Calidad , Radiografía/normas , Tecnología Radiológica/normas , Película para Rayos X/normas
14.
Probl Vet Med ; 2(1): 46-84, 1990 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2134590

RESUMEN

Veterinarians have been radiographing animal skulls for many years, but sophisticated dentistry was not widely used until the 1970s. Elevated awareness of veterinary dental techniques has led to the need for producing accurate radiographic images of the teeth and periodontal structures. Many problems arise for the clinician who treats small animals who has, before this time, radiographed the skull of dogs and cats solely for the purpose of assessing neoplastic, infectious, or traumatic disease of the mandible, maxilla, or calvarium and now desires to perform dental radiography. This chapter will describe the advantages and disadvantages of some of the more common types of radiographic equipment and supplies, discuss extraoral and intraoral radiographic positioning and technique, identify anatomic landmarks and diagnostic features of intraoral radiography, and offer suggestions concerning the art of using dental radiography in veterinary practice.


Asunto(s)
Gatos/anatomía & histología , Perros/anatomía & histología , Radiografía Dental/veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades de los Gatos/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Periodontales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Periodontales/veterinaria , Radiografía Dental/instrumentación , Película para Rayos X/veterinaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...