Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 117
Filtrar
1.
JAMA ; 331(24): 2075-2076, 2024 06 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809524

RESUMEN

This Viewpoint discusses the recent use of forced nitrogen inhalation as capital punishment in Alabama and describes the body of evidence indicating that forced nitrogen inhalation is an inhumane practice.


Asunto(s)
Pena de Muerte , Hipoxia , Nitrógeno , Tortura , Humanos , Pena de Muerte/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pena de Muerte/métodos , Nitrógeno/administración & dosificación , Estados Unidos , Administración por Inhalación , Hipoxia/etiología
2.
J Med Philos ; 47(1): 18-31, 2022 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35137170

RESUMEN

The practice of health-care professional involvement in capital punishment has come under scrutiny since the implementation of lethal injection as a method of execution, raising questions of the goals of medicine and the ethics of medicalized procedures. The American Medical Association and other professional associations have issued statements prohibiting physician involvement in capital punishment because medicine is dedicated to preserving life. I address the three primary arguments against health-care professionals being involved in lethal injection (healing, trust, and nonmaleficence) and argue that they are not strong enough to prohibit physician involvement in the lethal injection process.


Asunto(s)
Pena de Muerte , Pena de Muerte/métodos , Ética Médica , Humanos , Principios Morales , Estados Unidos
5.
Anaesthesia ; 74(5): 630-637, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30786320

RESUMEN

A decision by a society to sanction assisted dying in any form should logically go hand-in-hand with defining the acceptable method(s). Assisted dying is legal in several countries and we have reviewed the methods commonly used, contrasting these with an analysis of capital punishment in the USA. We expected that, since a common humane aim is to achieve unconsciousness at the point of death, which then occurs rapidly without pain or distress, there might be a single technique being used. However, the considerable heterogeneity in methods suggests that an optimum method of achieving unconsciousness remains undefined. In voluntary assisted dying (in some US states and European countries), the common method to induce unconsciousness appears to be self-administered barbiturate ingestion, with death resulting slowly from asphyxia due to cardiorespiratory depression. Physician-administered injections (a combination of general anaesthetic and neuromuscular blockade) are an option in Dutch guidelines. Hypoxic methods involving helium rebreathing have also been reported. The method of capital punishment (USA) resembles the Dutch injection technique, but specific drugs, doses and monitoring employed vary. However, for all these forms of assisted dying, there appears to be a relatively high incidence of vomiting (up to 10%), prolongation of death (up to 7 days), and re-awakening from coma (up to 4%), constituting failure of unconsciousness. This raises a concern that some deaths may be inhumane, and we have used lessons from the most recent studies of accidental awareness during anaesthesia to describe an optimal means that could better achieve unconsciousness. We found that the very act of defining an 'optimum' itself has important implications for ethics and the law.


Asunto(s)
Suicidio Asistido/ética , Suicidio Asistido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inconsciencia/etiología , Pena de Muerte/métodos , Ética Médica , Europa (Continente) , Eutanasia Activa Voluntaria/ética , Eutanasia Activa Voluntaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Despertar Intraoperatorio , Legislación Médica , Estados Unidos
8.
Pharmacotherapy ; 37(10): 1249-1257, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28801944

RESUMEN

The history of capital punishment in the United States is long and controversial. In many cases, lethal injection has brought medical personnel, ethically and professionally charged with preserving life, into the arena of assisting the state in taking life. U.S. Supreme Court decisions, including Baze v. Rees (2008) and Glossip v. Gross (2015), have evaluated and condoned lethal injection protocols. Despite the judicial validation of some midazolam-containing protocols, controversy exists about the level of unconsciousness provided due to the ceiling effects of the drug. Drug shortages, induced in part by manufacturers under pressure by death penalty opponents and governments opposed to capital punishment, have forced states to sometimes use creative means to obtain medications for use in lethal injection, even proposing to allow inmates to supply their own drugs for use in execution. Others have resorted to using compounding pharmacies and enacting tougher execution secrecy laws to protect the identities of those involved in the process. Professional organizations representing health care team members, including nursing, medicine, and pharmacy, among others, have roundly denounced the medicalization of capital punishment. Legal challenges continue to mount at all levels, leading to an uncertain future for lethal injection.


Asunto(s)
Discusiones Bioéticas , Pena de Muerte/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pena de Muerte/métodos , Servicios Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Servicios Farmacéuticos/ética , Decisiones de la Corte Suprema , Estados Unidos
12.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 12(6): 1026-1034, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26723905

RESUMEN

Lethal injection is the preferred method for the execution of condemned prisoners in the United States. A recent decision of The European Union to prohibit the export of drugs used in capital punishment to the USA along with domestic firms ceasing to manufacture these drugs has resulted in a drug shortage and a search for alternative drugs and new drug combinations that have not been previously validated for inducing death. As a consequence, some of the executions did not proceed as expected and sparked public debate regarding whether recent executions by lethal injection serve the purpose of avoiding "cruel and unusual punishment" in executions. Moreover, a cottage industry comprised of compounding pharmacies as emerged as a source of drug combinations used in capital punishment. Although there is a growing trend toward the abolishment of capital punishment in United States, the controversy concerning the efficacy of drug and involvement of health care professionals in the execution procedure is far from over.


Asunto(s)
Pena de Muerte/métodos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Servicios Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Pena de Muerte/tendencias , Comercio , Combinación de Medicamentos , Composición de Medicamentos , Industria Farmacéutica , Unión Europea , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/provisión & distribución , Estados Unidos
18.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother ; 28(3): 276-81, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25121632

RESUMEN

Several independent elements have recently combined to thrust United States capital punishment into a chaos. Corrections officials and policy makers have attempted to "humanize" capital punishment by evolving into a chemical execution process, and soften the outward appearance. Foreign policies have interrupted chemical protocols by banning key ingredients. These disruptions are spawning new theories of legal challenges in capital punishment. This is a critical time for stakeholders and all members of a civilized society to pause and reflect on the role of capital punishment.


Asunto(s)
Pena de Muerte , Pena de Muerte/historia , Pena de Muerte/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pena de Muerte/métodos , Ética Médica , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Sociedades Médicas , Tiopental/provisión & distribución , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA