Patch Transplant in Corneal Perforations: Time, Method, and Cause.

OBJECTIVES: We present demographic data and clinical features of corneal perforations repaired with patch grafts prepared from residual donor corneal rims. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this retrospective study, we evaluated patients who underwent corneal perforation repair with corneal or corneoscleral patch grafts. We recorded demographic data, as well as perforation cause, examination notes, tissue type-size used, follow-up time, and additional surgeries. Anterior segment photographs were also evaluated. Transplanted tissues were prepared from residual donor corneas used in penetrating keratoplasty and were manually adjusted to the precise size of the wound. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. Mean age of the patients was 64.9 ± 19.7 years (range, 15-81 years) with a female-to-male ratio of 0.85. The causes of perforation were grouped as inflammation, infection, and trauma. The main indications were inflammation (n = 7; 46.7%) and infection (n = 6; 40%), followed by trauma (n = 2; 13.3%). All patients demonstrated preservation of globe integrity during the follow-up time; however, 1 patient's eye required regrafting with limbal conjunctival excision due to melting and leakage. Three eyes required permanent tarsorrhaphy to control progressive exposure keratopathy, and 2 eyes underwent penetrating keratoplasty to cure scar-related corneal opacity. CONCLUSIONS: Patch grafts are effective surgical interventions to assure and maintain globe integrity in corneal perforations. The main advantage seems to be that patch grafting allows special preparations for wound architecture. Moreover, in clinics performing keratoplasty, these patch tissues are readily available.

The incidence of severe complications in acanthamoeba keratitis: Qualitative and quantitative systematic assessment.

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a rare, sight-threating corneal infection. The disease is challenging to diagnose and treat, and the amoeba can rapidly encyst, persisting in the tissue and causing recurrences. Medical therapy is conventionally considered the first line treatment, but advanced cases could require more invasive treatments like a "chaud" corneal transplant. We review the incidence of severe complications in patients affected by AK. Of 439 reports screened, 158 met our inclusion criteria. Incidence of severe complications was low, with 2.21 % patients developing perforation, 1 % requiring evisceration/enucleation and less than 1 % developing endophthalmitis. Corneal transplantation was required in 16.68 % of the cases. According to our results, and considering the reported incidences of these complications in other infectious keratitis, AK patients have an overall low risk of developing perforation, endophthalmitis, and enucleation/evisceration. Nevertheless, data available in the literature remain poor, and further randomized control trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Secondary bacterial corneal infection caused by Myroides species in primary fungal keratitis.

A middle-aged male patient presented with a central corneal perforation in a deep stromal infiltrate in his left eye. An emergency therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty was performed. Microbiological evaluation of the corneal scraping specimen revealed septate fungal filaments on stains. However, culture reports after 24 hours from the scraping sample and the excised half corneal button showed growth of gram-negative bacilli. This pathogen was identified as an aerobic, non-fermentative, gram-negative, bacillus by conventional microbiology and confirmed as Myroides species by the VITEK 2 Compact system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Susceptibility to chloramphenicol was noted based on which the patient was treated with topical chloramphenicol 0.5%. No recurrence of the infection was noted. This is the first reported case of corneal infection with the Myroides species of bacteria which, heretofore, have been known to cause endocarditis and urinary tract infections.

Interface fluid syndrome caused by the corneal perforation injury after small incision lenticule extraction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: To report a case of interface fluid syndrome (IFS) following traumatic corneal perforation repair after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old woman, with a past history of SMILE, was struck in the left eye with a barbecue prod and subsequently underwent corneal perforation repair at local hospital. Primary wound repaired with a single 10 - 0 nylon suture at the area of leakage. After the surgery, her best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/30. Four days later, she presented at our hospital with blurred vision, and interface fluid syndrome (IFS) was diagnosed. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) was used to guide the resuturing of the corneal perforation in the left eye, followed by anterior chamber gas injection. At the first postoperative month, the BCVA was 20/25. The corneal cap adhered closely to the stroma, the surface became smooth. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that any corneal perforation following lamellar surgery, including SMILE, may lead to IFS. It is crucial to consider the depth of corneal perforation, and intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) plays a unique role in the repair procedure.

Patch endothelial keratoplasty for corneal perforations secondary to ocular surface disease: case series.

BACKGROUND: Corneal perforation is an ophthalmic emergency. The conventional management of corneal perforation can be associated with severe complications especially in patients with ocular surface disease. Endothelial keratoplasty has been suggested as an alternative surgical technique for the management of corneal perforations. We present a case series of nine patients with corneal perforation and ocular surface disease managed with secondary patch endothelial keratoplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of nine patch endothelial keratoplasties performed between 2016 and 2022 at a quaternary eye hospital in Australia. The surgical technique is similar to conventional endothelial keratoplasty except descemetorhexis was not performed. RESULTS: A total of 9 cases were treated during the review period. Eight of the nine cases had an improvement in visual acuity. One case failed to achieve corneal tectonic objective. CONCLUSION: Patch endothelial keratoplasty is a safe secondary procedure for the management of corneal perforations in patients with ocular surface disease.

Customized therapeutic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in perforated Mooren's ulcer: A novel technique.

We describe customized therapeutic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for treating a perforated Mooren's ulcer. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy revealed corneal perforation (3.5 mm × 3.0 mm) with iris prolapse. The corneal melt extended from 9.0 o'clock to 4.0 o'clock. The peripheral edge of the ulcer was sloping, whereas the medial edge showed undermining. Immunological tests did not reveal any evidence of systemic autoimmune disease. In view of extensive peripheral corneal melt with large corneal perforation, the patient needed tectonic keratoplasty. The penetrating graft is not only technically demanding but also results in a poor visual outcome. We advised customized tectonic DALK. We used two different-sized trephines to obtain appropriate-sized donor tissue and avoided manual dissection. The post-surgery period was uneventful. He was prescribed topical steroids and oral methotrexate. He achieved 6/9 aided visual acuity at 4 months and maintained it until the last follow-up at 36 months.

Proportion and characteristics of lacrimal drainage pathway disease and keratopathy in non-infectious corneal perforation using lacrimal syringing test.

Lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy (LDAK) has been associated with corneal perforation, which arises from both infectious and non-infectious corneal disorders. However, patients with corneal perforation are often not routinely tested for LDAK, and the potential risk posed by LDAK in the development of corneal ulcers has not been investigated in detail. This study aimed to assess the proportion and characteristics of LDAK in patients with non-infectious corneal perforation using lacrimal syringing test. This study enrolled 56 patients with corneal perforation treated at Saitama Medical University Hospital between January 2016 and September 2022. The causes of corneal perforation were trauma (n = 17, 30%), infection (n = 19, 34%), non-infection (n = 16, 29%), and unknown (n = 4, 7%). A lacrimal syringing test was performed on 12 patients with non-infectious corneal perforation and 4 with an unknown diagnosis. Among the 16 patients with non-infectious corneal perforation, 13 (81%) had lacrimal drainage disease, but only 3 (19%) patients had lacrimal puncta, as revealed by slit-lamp examinations. The primary bacterial species identified in lacrimal obstructive disease and lacrimal canaliculitis were Staphylococcus spp. and Actinomycetes spp. respectively. Lower temporal and peripheral corneal perforations were common. All patients underwent lacrimal surgery, and 6 (38%) were treated for corneal perforation without corneal surgery. Interestingly, several patients with LDAK who did not exhibit any lacrimal duct obstruction on slit-lamp examination. The study findings demonstrate the significance of the lacrimal syringing test for assessing LDAK in patients with corneal perforation, indicating LDAK as a potential cause of corneal perforation.

Pterygium combined with corneal perforation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pterygium is a common ocular surface disease. Pterygium combined with corneal perforation is rare. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old female patient visited our outpatient clinic due to sudden onset of blurred vision and increased tearing in her left eye. The visual acuity was 1.0 OD and intraocular pressure (IOP) of 19.5 mmHg for the right eye with no significant abnormalities found in the anterior and posterior segments. The visual acuity of her left eye was 0.06, and IOP was 6.2 mmHg. A triangular vascular membranous tissue was seen in her left eye below the nose growing into the cornea and the pupil area was not touched. Slit-lamp examination revealed a tiny round corneal perforation in 8 o'clock position of the lesion area. Hospital diagnosis was given as pterygium combined with corneal perforation. The patient was treated with levofloxacin eye drops and autologous serum-based eye drops. CONCLUSIONS: We report a rare case of pterygium combined with corneal perforation. Perforation is a very rare complication of pterygium. This patient received proper treatment and good result was seen. This article aimed to improve clinicians' understanding of pterygium.

Corneal perforation after corneal foreign body - Case Report.

Purpose: To present the case of a patient with a history of trauma and corneal foreign body in the right eye, followed by decreased visual acuity in the right eye, corneal perforation with good recovery after surgical treatment. Material and method: We report a case of a patient who presented to our clinic with a sudden decrease of visual acuity in the right eye, two months after an incident resulting in a corneal foreign body in the right eye. In the case presented, the patient applied a local medical self-treatment, an antibiotic and a topical corticosteroid. After a few weeks, the patient presented to the ophthalmologist, a foreign body was extracted from the cornea of the right eye and a topical treatment with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, a cycloplegic and an antibiotic were indicated. However, corneal perforation occurred and the patient was urgently sent to our service, where a corneal anaesthesia was also found. Results: Corneal perforation healed with a minor paracentral opacification. Discussions: Corneal perforation in our patient was due to corneal melting because of topical steroid anti-inflammatory autotherapy, late corneal foreign body extraction and topical treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Corneal anesthesia is also an important factor that enhances corneal melting and perforation. The surgical intervention performed healed the corneal perforation. Conclusions: Corneal anaesthesia and topical anti-inflammatory administration led to corneal perforation. Corneal sensitivity should be tested in patients with corneal foreign body. Corneal patching proved to be an adequate solution in this patient.

Management of corneal perforations in dry eye disease: Preferred practice pattern guidelines.

Corneal perforations in eyes with dry eye disease (DED) are difficult to manage due to the interplay of several factors such as the unstable tear film, surface inflammation, and the underlying systemic disease affecting the wound healing process, and the eventual outcome. A careful preoperative examination is required to identify the underlying pathology, and status of ocular surface and adnexa, rule out microbial keratitis, and order appropriate systemic workup in addition to assessing the perforation itself. Several surgical options are available, which include tissue adhesives, multilayered amniotic membrane grafting (AMT), tenon patch graft (TPG), corneal patch graft (CPG), and penetrating keratoplasty (PK). The choice of procedure depends upon the size, location, and configuration of the perforation. In eyes with smaller perforations, tissue adhesives are effective treatment modalities, whereas AMT, TPG, and CPG are viable options in moderate-sized perforations. AMT and TPG are also preferable in cases where the placement of a bandage contact lens may be a challenge. Large perforations require a PK, with additional procedures such as tarsorrhaphy to protect the eyes from the associated epithelial healing issues. Conjunctival flaps are considered in eyes with poor visual potential. The management of the acute condition is carried out in conjunction with measures to improve the tear volume bearing in mind the chances of delayed epithelialization and re-perforation in these cases. Administration of topical and systemic immunosuppression, when indicated, helps improve the outcome. This review aims to facilitate clinicians in instituting a synchronized multifaceted therapy for the successful management of corneal perforations in the setting of DED.

Fungal Keratitis and Corneal Perforation as a Rare Complication of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Treatment.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report a case of fungal keratitis with subsequent corneal perforation after corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) treatment performed for keratoconus. CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old woman presented with redness and discharge in the left eye. She had a history of bilateral CXL procedure performed for keratoconus elsewhere 4 days earlier. The visual acuity was hand motion in the left eye. Slit-lamp examination revealed extended corneal melting with surrounding infiltrates. The patient was hospitalized, and corneal epithelial scraping samples were sent for microbiological assessment. In the meantime, empirical antibiotic therapy (fortified topical antibiotics: vancomycin 50 mg/mL, ceftazidime 50 mg/mL, and fluconazole 2 mg/mL q1 hour) was initiated. In direct microscopy of the corneal scraping, septate hyaline fungal hyphae were detected and topical fluconazole was switched to topical voriconazole (10 mg/mL). Three days after hospitalization, corneal melting progressed to perforation and corneal suturing with 10-0 monofilament was performed to reform the anterior chamber. Complete resolution of keratitis with residual scarring was noticed in 2 weeks. Three months later, penetrating keratoplasty was performed to obtain better visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: CXL with riboflavin has become a common procedure to prevent keratoconus progression by strengthening the biomechanical specialties of the cornea. Although the treatment itself has been used in the management of microbial keratitis and related corneal melting, fungal keratitis and corneal perforation after a CXL procedure for keratoconus might also be detected. Clinicians should be aware of this rare but devastating complication of CXL treatment and start prompt treatment when suspected.

Recurrence of perforation and overall patient survival after penetrating keratoplasty versus amniotic membrane transplantation in corneal perforation.

PURPOSE: The following is a comparative analysis on the treatment outcomes of corneal perforations using amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: This monocentric retrospective study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany. A total of 78 eyes of 78 patients were included. Thirty-nine eyes received an AMT, and 39 patients were treated with a PK. Primary outcome was recurrence of perforation. Secondary outcomes were patient mortality and visual acuity. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed with regard to a recurrence of perforation between the two groups (26% in AMT vs 23% in PK, p > 0.99). The time of recurrences was within the first two years and did not differ statistically (p = 0.97). In addition, a proportional hazards model with cox regression regarding recurrent perforation showed no significant differences (p = 0.5). After AMT, 41% and after KP, 28% of the patients died during follow-up (p = 0.2), respectively. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.0001) and the age at the time of surgery (p = 0.0002) were statistically significantly higher in those who were deceased. A mean follow-up of 485 ± 517 days was recorded. CONCLUSION: Both surgical methods show good results and no statistically significant difference regarding recurrent perforation rate. About a third of the patients died during the follow-up period. The decision regarding the appropriate method should therefore be based on a combination of all factors.

SMILE lenticule versus amniotic membrane graft (AMG) augmented with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of perforated corneal ulcer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stromal lenticule obtained from small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery versus amniotic membrane graft (AMG) augmented with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of perforated corneal ulcers and compare the results between the two groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a comparative retrospective study that included 40 eyes with medium-sized corneal perforations, which were classified into two equal groups of 20 eyes each; group (A) was treated with SMILE lenticule graft and group (B) was treated with AMG augmented with PRP. Pre- and postoperative evaluations were carried out using both slit-lamp (SL) examination and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), including closure of perforation, complete healing, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Complete closure of the perforation was achieved in both groups. However, healing was faster in the SMILE lenticule group than in the AMG with PRP group (P < 0.05). Complete healing was achieved in both groups: 100% in SMILE lenticule group and 95% in AMG with PRP group (P > 0.05). Both groups had few insignificant complications (30% in each), which were managed. CONCLUSION: Both methods achieved adequate healing of corneal perforations within few weeks without significant complications. However, the stromal lenticule obtained from small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery tended to be safer with faster healing than AMG with PRP.

Case Report: Corneal perforation secondary to orbital cellulitis caused by Streptococcus pseudoporcinus infection.

INTRODUCTION: This report described a rare case of corneal perforation secondary to orbital cellulitis caused by Streptococcus pseudoporcinus (S. pseudoporcinus) infection. To the best of our knowledge, only six cases of S. pseudoporcinus infection have been reported. This case report suggested that S. pseudoporcinus infection was contagious and potentially life threatening. The report emphasized the value of managing infections early to avoid serious consequences. CASE DESCRIPTION: A patient with orbital cellulitis, which progressed to corneal perforation was admitted to the hospital for right facial swelling, pain, and decreased vision in his right eye. S. pseudoporcinus infection was found after bacterial culture of pus puncture. After aggressive anti-infection and surgical treatment, the infection was eliminated, and the patient was discharged. However, the patient had sustained permanent vision loss. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggested the potential risk of corneal perforation and orbital cellulitis caused by S. pseudoporcinus infection in humans. The specific biological changes and mode of action of S. pseudoporcinus are unclear and need further investigation.