Purulent Pericarditis as the First Manifestation of Esophageal Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Purulent pericarditis secondary to esophago-pericardial fistula is a serious complication that has been previously reported in patients with esophageal cancer treated with radio/chemotherapy and esophageal stenting. However, the presence of esophago-pericardial fistula as the first manifestation of advanced carcinoma of the esophagus is exceedingly infrequent. We report the case of a 61-year-old male who presented with sepsis, cardiac tamponade and septic shock who was found to have an esophago-pericardial fistula secondary to squamous carcinoma of the esophagus. Emergency pericardiocentesis was performed with subsequent hemodynamic improvement. The drained pericardial fluid was purulent in nature and cultures were positive for Streptococcus anginosus. A CT scan followed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with tissue biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. A self-expanding covered stent was endoscopically placed to exclude the fistula and restore the esophageal lumen. In this report, we discuss some aspects related to the diagnosis and management of this serious clinical entity.

Assessment of Radiation Induced Pneumonitis and Pericarditis in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Treatment Using Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the proportion of radiationinduced pneumonitis and pericarditis in patients who have received Hypo-fractionated Radiation along with simultaneous integrated boost technique after breast conservative surgery using a prospective observational study from a tertiary hospital. MATERIALS & METHODS: The incidence of radiationinduced pneumonitis and pericarditis was evaluated in all adult patients with biopsy-proven early-stage unilateral breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by hypo-fractionated radiation with a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Baseline assessments including a six-minute walk test, highresolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (ECHO) were performed. At three months post-radiation treatment, patients underwent follow-up assessments with a six-minute walk test, ECG and ECHO. At six months post-radiation treatment, patients underwent further assessments with a six-minute walk test, ECG, ECHO, PFTs, and HRCT of the thorax. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 19. RESULTS: Our study investigated the incidence of acute radiation-induced pneumonitis and pericarditis in patients treated with hypofractionated VMAT-SIB technique in 20 eligible early breast cancer patients. The study found that the technique is feasible and achieves encouraging dosimetric parameters, including well achieved ipsilateral lung and heart doses. The reduced treatment time of 3-4 weeks compared to the previous 6-7 weeks with sequential boost was also found to be desirable in resource-constrained settings. The incidence of acute radiation pneumonitis and pericarditis was acceptable and comparable to existing data, with 90% of patients experiencing grade 1 radiation pneumonitis according to CTCAE v5.0. Post-treatment pulmonary function tests showed significant changes, particularly in patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nodal irradiation. The six-minute walk test and Borg scale also showed a significant positive correlation with pulmonary function tests. There was no significant pericarditis during the follow-up. The study proposes that the hypofractionated radiotherapy using VMAT-SIB is a suitable alternative to conventional fractionation, with acceptable acute toxicities, but longer follow-up is required to assess the impact on late toxicities. CONCLUSION: Our research has shown that hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with SIB is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with early breast cancer. This treatment method doesn't pose any significant short-term risks to the lungs or heart, and the SIB technique provides better coverage, conformity and sparing of organs at risk. Additionally, patients have reported positive cosmetic outcomes with this treatment. However, to make more accurate conclusions, we need to conduct further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to evaluate the potential longterm side effects of this treatment using VMAT in whole breast radiation.

Acute and Complicated Inflammatory Pericarditis: A Guide to Contemporary Practice.

Inflammatory disease of the pericardium represents a relatively common presentation, especially among the young. For the most part, inflammatory pericardial disease can be expeditiously and effectively managed without significant sequelae. However, some individuals present with severe and recurrent illness, representing significant therapeutic challenges. During the past decade, there have been great strides made in developing an evidence-based approach to management of inflammatory pericardial disease, the result of which has been the development of (1) a systematic, protocoled approach to initial care; (2) targeted therapeutics; and (3) specialized, collaborative, and integrated care pathways. Herein we present a review of the current state of the art as it pertains to the diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic considerations in inflammatory pericardial disease with a focus on acute and complicated pericarditis.

Characterization of Brighton Collaboration criteria for myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccine in Korean adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are vital for public health, but concerns about adverse effects, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis linked to COVID-19 vaccines-, persist. This study investigates the application of Brighton Collaboration case definition to national vaccine safety data related to post-COVID-19 vaccine myo/pericarditis, utilizing claims under the Korea National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NIVCP). METHODS: This study analyzed 190 medical records of individuals who claimed to have developed myo/pericarditis after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, as reported to the NVICP between specified dates, categorizing cases based on the Brighton criteria for myocarditis or pericarditis. RESULTS: Between 2021-2022, NVICP received 190 cases meeting the Brighton criteria for myocarditis or pericarditis at levels 1, 2, or 3. Most cases fell into Level 2 (70%), followed by Level 1 (29%), and one at Level 3 (1%), with Level 1 cases showing a higher hospitalization rate (87.3%) and a notable proportion requiring admission to the Intensive Care Unit (25.5%). Chest pain and Troponin-I/T elevation were common findings in Level 1 cases, while Level 2 cases exhibited similar patterns but at a slightly lower frequency. Electrocardiogram and echocardiography findings differed between the two levels. CONCLUSION: The Brighton Collaboration case definition proved valuable for classifying and assessing AEFI data, enhancing our understanding of the potential relationship between myocarditis and the COVID-19 vaccine.

Hemodynamics of low-pressure cardiac tamponade: An illustrative case report.

A 55-year-old male with acute pericarditis presented with low-pressure cardiac tamponade (LPCT) unresponsive to volume infusion. Subsequent pericardiocentesis resulted in hemodynamic improvement and unmasking of pericardial constriction. This case provides illustrative hemodynamic tracings of LPCT. Additionally, the presence of concurrent pericardial constriction that may indicate a plausible underlying mechanism for the blunted responsiveness to fluid expansion in LPCT. The underlying physiologic processes and the associated hemodynamic tracings are discussed.

Rilonacept use in lupus pericarditis.

OBJECTIVES: Lupus pericarditis affects 22% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is associated with worse outcomes, and often requires immunosuppression. Rilonacept is an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of recurrent idiopathic pericarditis, but its efficacy in lupus pericarditis is unknown. Here, we report the efficacy of rilonacept in a case series of patients with lupus pericarditis. METHODS: We describe a case series of 4 patients with refractory lupus pericarditis treated with rilonacept in the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center. All patients met the 2012 SLICC criteria for SLE. Refractory lupus pericarditis was defined as recurring or persistent typical pericardial pain symptoms despite standard-of-care treatment including at least one immunosuppressant. RESULTS: Four patients with refractory pericarditis were included. All patients were women, age ranged 26-44 years, 2 patients reported White, 1 Black, and 1 Hispanic ethnicity. Extra-pericardial SLE manifestations were heterogeneous among patients. Only 1 of 3 patient had elevated CRP (not measured in one). Two patients were previously treated with anakinra with initial response, but pericarditis redeveloped in both. Rilonacept led to complete resolution of pericardial symptoms in 3 patients, and partial resolution (40%) in 1, within 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Rilonacept successfully treated lupus pericarditis in this case series. Rilonacept should be considered for the treatment of lupus pericarditis.

Acute pericarditis as the presenting symptom of a case of oesophageal carcinoma.

Oesophageal carcinoma is a globally prevalent form of cancer. Patients with advanced disease often experience progressive dysphagia and weight loss as initial symptoms, but pericarditis is an uncommon presentation. This study describes a young man who presented with pericarditis and was diagnosed with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The patient's diagnosis came after presenting with intermittent chest pain. His diagnostic tests included an ECG showing ST elevation, echocardiography showing pericardial effusion and elevated inflammatory markers. His imaging tests revealed a neoplastic lesion in the lower oesophagus with metastases. He was initially treated as a case of pericarditis, followed by palliative chemotherapy for his cancer. Pericarditis, as the initial presentation of oesophageal carcinoma, is rare. There have only been 19 cases reported and published in the literature. Treatment depends on the stage of the disease. This case emphasises the importance of considering malignancy in unusual presentations of pericarditis, especially in young patients.

Interleukin-1 Blockers in Recurrent and Acute Pericarditis: State of the Art and Future Directions.

Diseases of the pericardium encompass a spectrum of conditions, including acute and recurrent pericarditis, where inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations. Anti-inflammatory therapy indeed forms the cornerstone of treating these conditions: NSAIDs, colchicine, and corticosteroids (as a second-line treatment) are recommended by current guidelines. However, these medications come with several contraindications and are not devoid of adverse effects. In recent years, there has been an increased focus on the role of the inflammasome and potential therapeutic targets. Recurrent pericarditis also shares numerous characteristics with other autoinflammatory diseases, in which interleukin-1 antagonists have already been employed with good efficacy and safety. The objective of this review is to summarize the available studies on the use of anti-IL-1 drugs both in acute and recurrent pericarditis.

Post-cardiac injury syndrome and pericardial effusion recurrence after pericardial effusion drainage in chronic idiopathic pericardial effusion.

INTRODUCTION: The management of even large pericardial effusions in asymptomatic patients is still a matter of debate. Aim of the present study is to explore, in a multicenter setting, the rate of post-cardiac injury syndromes (PCIS) and pericardial effusion recurrence after pericardial effusion drainage procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter international retrospective study including a consecutive cohort of patients diagnosed with large, chronic and idiopathic pericardial effusions, prospectively evaluated from January 2003 to December 2021 who underwent a clinically indicated pericardial drainage procedure. Two separate end-points were recorded: 1) recurrence of pericardial effusion after drainage without any sign of pericardial inflammation 2) occurrence of PCIS, defined as the new onset of pericarditis 1 to 6 weeks after pericardial intervention. RESULTS: 124 patients were enrolled (50 % female, mean age 64 years old). A mean follow-up of 29.6 ± 25.6 months was obtained in 110 patients (88 %). 110 patients were treated with pericardiocentesis (89 %), 25 with pleuro-pericardial windows (20 %), and 1 with pericardiectomy (1 %). PCIS occurred in 21 out of 124 patients followed for at least 6 weeks (16.9%). Recurrence of pericardial effusion after drainage without any sign of pericardial inflammation occurred in 68 out of 110 patients at a longer follow-up (61.8 %). At multivariate analysis only inflammatory cells in pericardial fluid was associated with PCIS and pericardiocentesis with pericardial effusion recurrency. CONCLUSION: Our data support the need of caution with the use of pericardiocentesis in asymptomatic patients with large pericardial effusion as it is often associated with pericardial effusion recurrence. Of interest the presence of inflammatory cells in the pericardial fluid is associated with PCIS after pericardial drainage procedures.

Successful Management of Malignant Pericarditis Using Nivolumab for Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Esophageal cancer is a malignant disease with a poor prognosis and is one of the most common causes of cardiac metastasis. Malignant pericarditis may cause the repetitive accumulation of pericardial effusion, which can occasionally pose a clinical challenge. We herein report a case of malignant pericarditis in a patient with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with cardiac tamponade, which was successfully managed with single pericardial drainage and systemic nivolumab monotherapy. This is the first case report to suggest that systemic therapy with nivolumab is a promising option for the management of malignant pericarditis.

Pericarditis After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Predictors and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is a mainstay of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Acute pericarditis after ablation is 1 of the frequently observed complications. There is a significant lack of data on the incidence and predictors of postablation pericarditis. OBJECTIVES: This study examines the incidence, characteristics, and predictors of pericarditis after AF ablation. METHODS: Patients undergoing AF ablation from January 1, 2016, to March 31, 2022, at Johns Hopkins were prospectively enrolled in an AF ablation registry. A clinical diagnosis of acute pericarditis was established in accordance with 2015 European Society of Cardiology guidelines by the presence of at least 2 of the following characteristics: pleuritic chest pain, friction rub, typical electrocardiographic changes, or pericardial effusion within 3 months after the ablation procedure. RESULTS: Of 1,540 patients who underwent AF ablation, 57 patients (3.7%) developed acute pericarditis. Baseline clinical characteristics including age, sex, and body mass index were comparable between the pericarditis and nonpericarditis groups. The median time to symptom onset was 1 day. Electrocardiographic changes were observed in 34 (59.6%) patients, pericardial effusion developed in 7 (12%) patients, and the mean duration of medical treatment was 7 days (25th-75th percentile: 3-14 days). Most pericarditis cases were treated medically with disease-specific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (100%) and colchicine (81%). Effusion with tamponade necessitating pericardiocentesis was observed in 4 (7%) patients. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was performed in 869 (58.6%) patients in the nonpericarditis group and 39 (68.4%) patients with pericarditis; cryoballoon ablation was performed in 486 (32.8%) patients in the nonpericarditis group and 11 (19.3%) patients with pericarditis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified RF ablation (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.07-4.08; P = 0.03) as an independent predictor of acute pericarditis after AF ablation, whereas age per unit increase was associated with a decreased risk (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.995; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute pericarditis after catheter ablation in our study population was 3.7%. RF ablation and younger age were independent risk factors for postablation acute pericarditis.

The Potential Relationship Between Cardiovascular Diseases and Monkeypox.

Mpox, a novel epidemic disease, has broken out the period of coronavirus disease 2019 since May 2022, which was caused by the mpox virus. Up to 12 September 2023, there are more than 90,439 confirmed mpox cases in over 115 countries all over the world. Moreover, the outbreak of mpox in 2022 was verified to be Clade II rather than Clade I. Highlighting the significance of this finding, a growing body of literature suggests that mpox may lead to a series of cardiovascular complications, including myocarditis and pericarditis. It is indeed crucial to acquire more knowledge about mpox from a perspective from the clinical cardiologist. In this review, we would discuss the epidemiological characteristics and primary treatments of mpox to attempt to provide a framework for cardiovascular physicians.

[Exudative pericarditis with tamponade after COVID-19. Case report].

A description of a COVID-19 patient with the development of exudative pericarditis complicated by cardiac tamponade is provid. A peculiarity of this case is the presence of an underlying disease in the patient (chronic lymphocytic leukemia), which was in remission for 1.5 years after chemotherapy. Another feature of the patient was the relatively small area of lung damage and the hemorrhagic nature of the pericardial effusion, which persisted for a long time. The insignificant activity of inflammatory markers was noteworthy. Possible mechanisms of development and features of the course of exudative pericarditis in the described patient, issues of diagnosis and treatment of this category of patients are discusse.

[Clinical features of pericarditis in patients with SARS-CoV-2]. / Características clínicas de la pericarditis en pacientes con SARS-CoV-2.

Background: COVID-19 disease (coronavirus disease 2019) has multiple potentially fatal cardiovascular complications and pericarditis is one of them; however, if prompt treatment is given, fatal events associated to this complication decrease. Its frequency and presentation characteristics are unknown, which is why its early diagnosis is important. Objective: To know the frequency of pericarditis secondary to COVID-19 and its presentation characteristics. Material and methods: Cross-sectional study in patients with a diagnosis of pericarditis after COVID-19 disease (with a positive test). Symptoms, age, sex, comorbidities, and electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) results were obtained. Results: A total of 3364 patients positive for COVID-19 were registered, out of which 10 met criteria for pericarditis, which represented a frequency of 0.30%. The average age of the sample was 46.1 years and 60% predominated in the male gender with a 1.5:1 ratio. The most frequent clinical characteristics were the presence of retrosternal pain (90%), absence of comorbidity (50%), and absence of electrocardiographic changes (40%). Conclusions: Pericarditis has a low frequency in patients with COVID-19. The predominant clinical presentation is chest pain. Almost half will not have electrocardiographic changes, and half will not have comorbidities.

Introducción: la enfermedad COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) tiene múltiples complicaciones cardiovasculares potencialmente mortales y la pericarditis es una de ellas; sin embargo, si se da un tratamiento oportuno disminuyen sus eventos fatales. Se desconoce su frecuencia y características de presentación, por lo que es importante su diagnóstico temprano. Objetivo: conocer la frecuencia de pericarditis secundaria a COVID-19 y sus características de presentación. Material y métodos: estudio transversal en pacientes con diagnóstico de pericarditis posterior a la enfermedad COVID-19 (con prueba positiva). Se obtuvo la sintomatología, edad, sexo, comorbilidades y resultados de electrocardiograma (ECG) y ecocardiograma transtorácico (ETT). Resultados: se registraron 3364 pacientes positivos a COVID-19, de los cuales 10 cumplieron con criterios para pericarditis, lo que representó una frecuencia del 0.30%. La edad promedio de la muestra fue de 46.1 años y predominó en el género masculino (60%) con una relación 1.5:1. Las características clínicas más frecuentes fueron la presencia de dolor retroesternal (90 %), ausencia de comorbilidad (50 %) y ausencia de cambios electrocardiográficos (40%). Conclusiones: la pericarditis tiene una frecuencia baja en pacientes con COVID-19. La presentación clínica predominante es el dolor retroesternal. Casi la mitad no tendrá cambios electrocardiográficos y la mitad no tendrá comorbilidades.

Pericarditis related to post-acute COVID infection: A case report and review of the literature.

Cardiovascular involvement has been described in acute and recovered COVID-19 patients. Here, we present a case of symptomatic pericarditis with persistent symptoms for at least six months after the acute infection and report 66 published cases of pericarditis in discharged COVID patients. Patient mean age ± SD was 49.7 ± 13.3 years, ranging from 15 to 75 years and 57.6% were female. A proportion of 89.4% patients reported at least one comorbidity, with autoimmune and allergic disorders, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, as the most frequent. Only 8.3% of patients experienced severe symptoms of acute COVID-19. The time between acute COVID and pericarditis symptoms varied from 14 to 255 days. Chest pain (90.9%), tachycardia (60.0%) and dyspnoea (38.2%) were the most frequent symptoms in post-acute pericarditis. A proportion of 45.5% and 87% of patients had an abnormal electrocardiogram and abnormal transthoracic ultrasound, respectively. Colchicine combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) were prescribed to 39/54 (72%) patients. Of them, 12 were switched to corticosteroid therapy due to non-response to the first-line treatment. Only 6 patients had persisting symptoms and were considered as non-respondent to therapy.Our report highlights that pericarditis should be suspected in COVID-19 patients with persistent chest pain and dyspnoea when pulmonary function is normal. Treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and colchicine is usually effective but corticosteroids are sometimes required.

Acute myopericarditis and left shoulder capsulitis following second dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Moderna vaccination.

Vaccination against mRNA SARS-CoV-2 has been administered on a very large scale and various side effects have been described. The increased risk of myopericarditis is known, and only a few cases of shoulder capsulitis have been reported after vaccination. These two pathologies have never been reported in the same patient after vaccination. Our article presents the history of a man in his 40s who presented with myopericarditis a few days after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with mRNA(Messenger RNA) Moderna® vaccine and who at the same time developed shoulder capsulitis. His cardiovascular symptoms resolved rapidly, and his shoulder symptoms improved/resolved within 1 year. This case should make physicians aware of the possibility of several concomitant side effects following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.