A Clinical Comparison of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Conventional Bur Methods in the Impacted Third Molar Surgery.

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether Er:YAG laser and piezosurgery methods can be an alternative to the conventional bur method. Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative pain, swelling, trismus and patient satisfaction between Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery device, and conventional bur methods that are used to remove bone barrier during extraction of the impacted lower third molar. Methods: Thirty healthy patients who have bilateral, asymptomatic, vertically impacted mandibular third molar teeth according to Pell and Gregory classification Class II and Winter Class B were selected. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In 30 patients one side of the bony cover around the tooth was removed by the conventional bur technique, on the other side 15 patients were treated with the Er:YAG laser (VersaWave dental laser; HOYA ConBio) 200 mJ, 30 Hz, 4.5-6 W, noncontact mode, SP and R-14 handpiece tip, under air and saline solution, and 15 patients with the piezosurgery technique (VarioSurg Piezo; NSK) with frequency 20-100 kHz, 10-80% power range in Surgery (S), continuous mode, with SG17 and SG5 handpiece tip blade. Preoperative, 48th hour and 7th day measurements were made and recorded about pain, swelling, and trismus. At the end of the treatment, patients were asked to fill out a satisfaction questionnaire. Results: The pain observed at the postoperative 24th hour was statistically significantly lower in the laser group than in the piezosurgery group (p < 0.05). Only in the laser group swelling was seen with statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative 48th h (p < 0.05). Postoperative 48th h trismus value was seen as the highest in the laser group than others. Patient satisfaction was found to be higher in the laser and piezo technique compared with the bur technique. Conclusions: Er:YAG laser and piezo methods can be a good alternative to the conventional bur method when postoperative complications are compared. We believe that laser and piezo methods will be preferred for patients due to increased patient satisfaction. Clinical Trial Registration number: B.30.2.ANK.0.21.63.00/08 date: 28.01.10 no:150/3.

A Comparison Between Piezosurgery and Conventional Osteotomies in Rhinoplasty on Post-Operative Oedema and Ecchymosis: A Systematic Review.

Piezosurgery use has become increasingly prevalent in osteotomies. Piezoelectric ultrasound waves can cut bone effectively, and some studies have shown reduced post-operative morbidities compared to conventional osteotomies. Oedema and ecchymosis are common complications of rhinoplasty and can impact patient satisfaction, wound healing, and recovery. We aim to provide an up-to-date comparison of post-operative oedema and ecchymosis in piezosurgery and conventional osteotomies. A literature search was conducted using the following online libraries; Pubmed, Cochrane, Science Direct, and ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number). English publications between 2015 and 2020 were included. A systematic review was completed, and a comparison of oedema and ecchymosis in piezosurgery and conventional osteotomies was examined alongside other outcomes such as pain, mucosal injury, and surgery time. Eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met our criteria with a combined total of 440 patients: 191 male and 249 female. Piezosurgery had statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in short-term oedema compared to conventional osteotomies in 75% of the papers included, and in 50% this persisted across the whole follow-up period. Similarly, ecchymosis scoring was initially statistically lower (p < 0.05) in piezosurgery in 87.5% of the RCTs, and in 75% this persisted across the whole follow-up period. A reduction in pain (p < 0.05) and mucosal injury (p < 0.05) was also seen in piezoelectric osteotomies. The length of surgery time varied. Piezoelectric osteotomies reduce oedema and ecchymosis compared to conventional osteotomies, in addition to improving pain and mucosal injury. However, disadvantages such as length of surgery time and cost have been reported. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Piezosurgery for safe and efficient petrous bone cutting in cerebellopontine angle and petroclival meningioma surgery.

Intradural petrous bone drilling has become a widespread practice, providing extended exposure in the removal of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) or petroclival tumors. Adjacent neurovascular structures are at risk, however, when drilling is performed in this deep and narrow area. Hence, this study evaluates the use of Piezosurgery (PS) as a non-rotating tool for selective bone cutting in CPA surgery. A Piezosurgery® device was used in 36 patients who underwent microsurgery for extra-axial CPA or petroclival tumors in our Neurosurgical Department between 2013 and 2019. The clinical and radiological data were retrospectively analyzed. The use of PS was evaluated with respect to the intraoperative applicability and limitations as well as efficacy and safety of the procedure. Piezosurgical petrous bone cutting was successfully performed in the removal of meningiomas or extra-axial metastases arising from the dura of the petroclival region (21 patients) or petrous bone (15 patients). PS proved to be very helpful in the deep and narrow CPA region, considerably reducing the surgeon's distress toward bone removal in close proximity to cranial nerves and vessels in comparison to common rotating drills. The use of PS was safe without injuries to neurovascular structures. Gross total resection was achieved in 67% of petroclival and 100% of petrous bone tumors. Piezosurgery proved to be an effective and safe method for selective petrous bone cutting in CPA surgery avoiding rotating power and associated risks. This technique can particularly be recommended for bone cutting in close vicinity to critical neurovascular structures.

A comparison of piezo surgery osteotomies with conventional internal osteotomies as performed by trainee surgeons: a cadaveric study.

INTRODUCTION: Aesthetic rhinoplasty remains a challenging procedure with high expectations and narrow tolerance for errors. Considerable training is required to achieve controlled and reliable results. Use of the Piezotome is gaining popularity for performing the nasal osteotomies, a key step in rhinoplasty, where it is reported to improve precision and predictability and to keep tissue damage to a minimum. We compare the outcomes of conventional osteotomy techniques to piezosurgery in human cadavers as undertaken by surgical trainees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven human cadavers were used and a total of 14 osteotomies were performed. Conventional osteotomies and piezosurgery were carried out each on one side of the cadaver. A number of fragments and a blinded assessment of the accuracy of the osteotomy compared with the preprocedure skin markings were carried out by two experienced rhinoplasty surgeons. The Mann-Whitney test for statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The mean number of fragments was 1.57 in the piezosurgery osteotomy and 2.14 using conventional osteotomies. Four of seven piezosurgery osteotomies achieved an accuracy within 1mm. The conventional osteotomies as performed by the trainees showed a significant mismatch of more than 3mm in three of seven of cases. Accuracy within 1mm was achieved in one of seven cases. DISCUSSION: Piezosurgery offers a safe, reliable and precise method of performing lateral nasal osteotomies. This human cadaver study shows a high accuracy of osteotomy and fewer comminuted fractures using this technique compared with conventional osteotomy techniques.

Orthognathic surgery: a randomized study comparing Piezosurgery and Saw techniques.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate specific parameters: intra-operative time, facial swelling, degree of pain (VAS scale), recovery time and neurosensory disturbance in patients who underwent orthognathic surgery either using piezo or saw devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective study, which included 100 patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) surgery combined with maxillary Le Fort I. They were separated into 2 groups of 50 patients each. The surgeries were performed between September 2015 and April 2017 by the same surgeon. RESULTS: Intra-op time is unchanged but patients operated with the Piezo devices requested fewer painkilling medication and were dismissed on the second day after the surgery. Neurosensory recovery was statistically significant in the Piezo group. CONCLUSION: Far less post-op swelling and the reduction in the use of painkillers lead to a speedier recovery in patients who underwent orthognathic surgery using Piezosurgery. These patients also recovered more sensitivity in the lower lip area. KEY WORDS: Orthognatic surgery, Piezosurgery, Saw.

Effect of piezoelectric osteotomy on postoperative oedema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of piezoelectric osteotomy in reducing oedema and ecchymosis during rhinoplasty via a systematic review with meta-analysis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two authors independently searched the referenced databases. PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, the Web of Science, the Cochrane library and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from inception to January 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Sufficient data were retrieved for a meta-analysis of six trials with a total of 327 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: They included studies that compared piezoelectric osteotomy (treatment groups) with conventional osteotomy (control group). The outcomes of interest were operative time, mucosal injury, oedema, ecchymosis and postoperative pain. Baseline study characteristics, quality of study, numbers of patients in the treatment and control groups and outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Intraoperative mucosal injury was significantly lower in the treatment group vs the control group, but operative time was longer in the treatment group. Eyelid oedema and ecchymosis in the first seven days postoperatively were statistically decreased in the treatment group vs the control group. In addition, pain in the first three days postoperatively was statistically decreased in the treatment group vs the control group. However, in a subgroup analysis according to osteotomy visibility in the control group (blind osteotomy vs osteotomy under direct vision), there was no significant difference in oedema and ecchymosis between treatment and osteotomy under direct vision. CONCLUSIONS: Piezoelectric osteotomy during rhinoplasty can reduce eyelid oedema and eyelid ecchymosis compared to conventional osteotomy. However, piezoelectric osteotomy had no significant advantages in terms of postoperative oedema and ecchymosis compared to osteotomy under direct vision.

An unusual case of invasive cervical resorption after piezosurgery-assisted en masse retraction.

A 16-year-old patient sought orthodontic correction for profile improvement and labially inclined maxillary incisors. She had Class II malocclusion, protrusive maxillary and mandibular incisors, and increased overjet and overbite with an American Board of Orthodontics discrepancy index value of 25. She was treated with maxillary premolar extractions and miniscrew-supported en masse retraction assisted with piezoincisions. Extraction spaces (7.5 mm per side) were closed with maximum anchorage in 10 months. Total treatment time was 23 months. Twenty-seven months after debonding, a pink spot was noted at the buccocervial region of the left central incisor. Radiographic evaluation on cone-beam computed tomographic scans revealed a severe case of invasive cervical resorption on both central incisors, around which the piezosurgical cuts had been made. Treatment proceeded with a nonintervention approach and the affected teeth were reinforced with a lingual retainer.

Is Piezoelectric Surgery Really Harmless to Soft Tissue?

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of piezoelectric surgery (piezosurgery) on soft tissue in open septorhinoplasty. METHODS: A total of 30 patients (21 females, 9 males; mean age 29.16 ±â€Š8.17 years; range, 18-43 years) who underwent open septorhinoplasty between January 2019 and February 2019 were randomly divided into 2 groups. After the nasal dorsum was opened in all groups, 1 mm tissue under the skin in radix region was taken as punch biopsy. In the first group (classical group, n =  15), the cartilage hump was resected with number 15 scalpel and the bone hump with the help of a chisel. Lateral and median osteotomies were conducted using 4 mm sharp osteotomes. Rasping was performed to dorsum to correct bone deformities. Then, 1 mm punch biopsy was taken from under the skin tissue of the nose back near the radix. In the second group (piezo group, n = 15) hump excision, osteotomies and rasping were performed by piezoelectric surgery. Then, 1 mm punch biopsy was taken from the subcutaneous tissue of the nose back near the radix. Biopsies were examined histopathologically in the light microscope for edema, necrosis, and inflammation. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients presented in this series, 21 were female and 9 were male. In the classical group, edema in the soft tissue was seen in 86.7% of the cases after osteotomy, while this rate was 26.7% in the piezosurgery group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Although necrosis was not seen prior to the osteotomy in both groups, the rate of necrosis in the classical group was 13.3% and in the piezo group it was 66.7%. Necrosis was significantly different in the piezosurgery group compared with the classical osteotomy group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Piezosurgery is not completely harmless to soft tissue. A statistically significant increase in subcutaneous necrosis compared with the classical group can be explained by long-term soft tissue trauma caused by piezoelectric vibrations. We think that developing necrosis may cause problems in late period, especially in patients with thin skin.

Application of Piezosurgery in En Bloc Laminectomy for the Treatment of Multilevel Thoracic Ossification of Ligamentum Flavum.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the application of piezosurgery in en bloc laminectomy for the treatment of multilevel thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum (MTOLF). METHODS: Forty-one cases who had MTOLF and underwent en bloc laminectomy from January 2012 to January 2017 were reviewed and divided into Group A (high-speed drill, n = 23) and Group B (piezosurgery, n = 18). Comparisons in clinical outcome and perioperative complications were carried out between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was comparable between Group A (12.6 months) and Group B (11.4 months). Both operation time and intraoperative blood loss in Group A were significantly more than those in Group B (P < 0). Although final Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score in both groups significantly increased, differences in preoperative JOA, final JOA, and neurologic recovery rate between the 2 groups weren't significant. Perioperative complications included early neurologic deterioration (1 in Group A), wound infection (2 in Group A and 1 in Group B), and leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (5 in Group A and 1 in Group B); incidences of these complications between the 2 groups weren't significant (P > 0.05). A relationship analysis showed that cases with preoperative tram track sign, tuberous OLF, or larger compression ratio were at greater risk of developing an intraoperative dura defect. CONCLUSIONS: The application of piezosurgery in en bloc laminectomy is a safe and effective method in the treatment of MTOLF, and it was advantageous for reducing both operation time and intraoperative blood loss compared with the high-speed drill.

Does Piezosurgery Influence the Severity of Neurosensory Disturbance Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy?

The present paper aims to evaluate the long-term incidence and severity of the neurosensory disturbance (NSD) of the inferior alveolar nerve following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandibular ramus performed with piezosurgery. A retrospective study on patients referred to the Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry Clinic of the University of Verona for orthognathic surgery between March 2013 and October 2015 was performed. Inclusion criteria were having undergone BSSO with piezosurgery and follow-up lasting at least 24 months. Exclusion criteria were history of surgical infection, osteosynthesis failure or re-do surgery. The extent of mandibular repositioning movements was retrieved and patients underwent 4 clinical neurosensory tests. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. 52 patients met the inclusion criteria. Average follow-up was 40 months (range 24-75). 83% of the nerves examined have no or slightly altered sensitivity. Seventy-one percent of patients perceive a moderate to none discomfort and none describes the discomfort as serious (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] >7). The extent of mandibular repositioning did not have significant influence on the development and severity of the NSD. Resulting data led the Authors to infer that using piezosurgery in BSSO, the severity of the NSD of inferior alveolar nerve is reduced, but the incidence of permanent nerve lesions remains unchanged, compared to historical controls.

Osteotomy in Genioplasty by Piezosurgery.

BACKGROUND: The chin is the most prominent and median sector of the lower third of the face giving harmony to nose and lips. The authors present the application of piezoelectric scalpel for the correction of different chin deformities. The distinctive characteristics of this device allow the authors to avoid or reduce the immediate genioplasty complications. METHODS: Fifty-five patients of defective chin have been treated from January 2006 to April 2008. Intraoral genioplasty was performed during the correction of dentofacial dysmorphisms or associated with nasal surgery. The authors used a piezoelectric cutting device to perform different osteotomies and if necessary, interpositional graft was used to stabilize bony segments. RESULTS: Piezosurgery has been associated with a fewer number of postoperative complications, especially as regard intraoperative bleeding, nerve injuries (immediate and late), hematomas and seromas, asymmetry (immediate and early). The mean time for completing the complete procedure of genioplasty with piezosurgery was almost the same compared with the saw and drill. CONCLUSION: Genioplasty represents one of the most common ancillary procedures and may be associated with corrective surgery of dentofacial dysmorphisms. Mental nerve injuries, asymmetries, intraoperative bleeding are the main immediate complications of genioplasty. Distinctive characteristics of ultrasonic piezoelectric osteotomy are selective cut of mineralized structure with less risk of vascular and nervous damage (microvibrations), intraoperative precision (thin cutting scalpel and no macrovibrations), blood free site (cavitation effect). In the authors' experience, piezoelectric scalpel, compared with saw and drill, enables them to reduce or avoid immediate complications of chin surgery, helping the surgeon to reach patients' satisfaction.

Flapless boning to increase space by piezosurgery: A novel mini-invasive strategy for teeth extraction. A retrospective study.

This study aimed to investigate the application of piezosurgery-associated flapless surgery for increasing bone space during teeth extraction and evaluate its success rate, postoperative outcomes, and incidence of major complications.From January 2014 to December 2016, patients who experienced teeth extraction via piezosurgery-associated flapless surgery were enrolled in this study. The positions, diagnosis, dental medical history, and radiographic examination of teeth were recorded before the treatment. During the surgery, the fracture or displacement of root, injuries of soft tissue, and fractures of the alveolar process were noted.A total of 140 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria in the present study. All these teeth were classified into 4 groups based on diagnosis: residual roots that underwent root canal therapy (28 cases), teeth with root fracture (37 cases), teeth extraction because of orthodontics needed (31 cases), and the vertically impacted lower third molar (44 cases). The radiographic presentation revealed about 50% ankylosed teeth. No root fracture and root displacement emerged, and all roots were removed intact. Moreover, fracture of the alveolar process did not occur. Two cases with buccal mucosal injury were noted, which were because of heat injuries caused by the basement of the tip while cool water was used out.This study introduced a novel mini-invasive strategy for increasing space during teeth extraction. The advantage of this piezosurgery-associated flapless surgery included maximal preservation of the alveolar bone, minimal injury to soft tissues, and prevention of root fracture during the surgery. Furthermore, the cool water used during the surgery must be carefully checked before the procedure.

Effect of Piezoelectric Technique on Auditory Function on Postoperative Day One in Septorhinoplasty Surgery.

AIM: To examine the effect of the piezoelectric application used increasingly for osteotomy and correction of nasal dorsum in septorhinoplasty surgeries on early auditory functions. METHODS: Our study was conducted after the decision of 10840098-604.01.01-E.9057 taken from Istanbul Medipol University Clinical Research Local Ethics Committee. This study was designed to be prospective, randomized and controlled. Twenty patients between 18 and 50 years of age that piezoelectric technique was used in the study group and 10 patients in the same age range who underwent nasal surgery (endoscopic sinus surgery, septoplasty, lower concha radiofrequency and nasal valve surgery) for any reason in the control group were included in the study. Audiologic functions of the patients in both the groups were assessed by pure audio audiometry, tympanometry and distortion product otoacoustic emission test before the surgery and 24 hours after the surgery. The data obtained were statistically compared using the SPSS 22.0 program and P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty patients (5 males, 15 females) that piezoelectric (ultrasonics) technique was used during septorhinoplasty in the study group and 10 patients (5 males, 5 females) in the control group were included in the study. In the study and the control groups, preoperative and postoperative air/bone path thresholds at the right and left ears did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 Hz. The results of distortion product otoacoustic emission results (signal/noise ratio) obtained postoperatively were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) with the results obtained preoperatively. CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that the piezoelectric technique used in septorhinoplasty does not cause a negative effect on auditory functions. This study is the first comparative study to investigate the effect of piezoelectric technique used in septorhinoplasty surgery on auditory functions. After further clinical studies performed with well-selected and large patient population, the piezoelectric techniques can be a preferred technique during septorhinoplasty operations.

Piezoelectric surgery inserts vs conventional burst: a clinical investigation.

Piezosurgery is a new technique that can be used to cut mineralized structures without damaging adjacent soft tissues. This device has a lot of advantages: reduced surgical time, blood loss, and inferior alveolar nerve injury in bimaxillary osteotomy. Fifty patients underwent different surgical operations (orthognathic surgery, traumatic surgery, reconstructive surgery, aesthetic procedures) with 7 different kind of piezosurgery inserts in a period of 8 months. The same two surgeons performed all the procedures. All the procedures were carried out in order to improve the precision of the osteotomy and the comfort of the surgeon. Piezoelectric devices provide an innovative ultrasonic technique for safe and effective osteotomy compared with methods that use rotating instruments. Different inserts have been developed in order to achieve the utmost advantages.

Comparison of Piezosurgery and Hammer-Chisel in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared the advantages and disadvantages of piezosurgery and hammer-chisel used in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and January 2016, 10 women and 8 men in whom piezosurgery was used (group 1) and 11 women and 7 men in whom hammer-chisel was used (group 2) during EDCR operations were compared retrospectively. Recurrence, operation time, postoperative bleeding, and operative cost were evaluated in patients who were followed for an average of 11.8 months. In addition, visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess pain at 6 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: No recurrence was observed in group 1, but recurrence was observed in 2 patients in group 2 (P = 0.685). There was no postoperative bleeding in both groups. The mean duration of operation was 30.6 ±â€Š8.2 minutes in group 1 and 46.8 ±â€Š9.5 minutes in group 2 (P = 0.038). The VAS score in group 1 was 2.7 ±â€Š1.4 and the VAS score in group 2 was 5.8 ±â€Š2.2 (P = 0.01). Piezosurgery costs an additional $325 for each patient while the use of the hammer-chisel does not incur additional costs. CONCLUSION: Piezosurgery causes shorter operation time, less recurrence, and less pain when compared with hammer-chisel.

Heat Production and Drill Wear Following Osseous Resective Surgery: A Preliminary In Vitro SEM Study Comparing Piezosurgery and Conventional Drilling.

The aim of this pilot in vitro study was to evaluate material wear and temperature variations after using conventional rotating bur and piezosurgical insert for osseous resective surgery in bovine bone blocks under physiologic irrigation. Wear evaluation was carried out by measuring cutting time, and wear mechanisms were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Time analysis showed greater material wear and higher heat production with the piezoelectric insert. However, temperatures remained below values of clinical concern even after a cutting time of 20 minutes. Conversely, bone surface appeared irregular in shape with bone debris and signs of thermal damage on the bur-drilled surface, probably due to the more traumatic action of the diamond-coated bur.

The Usefulness of Piezoelectric Surgery in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.

Mandibular osteotomy carries with it a risk of damaging blood vessels and nerves when using traditional surgical techniques. Piezosurgery®, is a new technique that uses ultrasonic vibration to enable bone-selective sectioning without damage to the surrounding soft tissues. However, paralysis may not be completely eliminated using Piezosurgery® for osteotomy. We investigated how piezoelectric surgery in bilateral sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) affected the surrounding soft tissue. Forty-four patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism underwent mandibular setback with BSSRO. Patients were divided into two groups, those treated by the conventional chisel technique and those treated by Piezosurgery®. Osteotomy time, blood loss, and incidence of paresthesia were compared retrospectively. Osteotomy time and blood loss in the piezo group were significantly reduced compared to the chisel group. Interestingly, whereas paresthesia incidence immediately after the operation did not differ between the groups, paresthesia in the piezo group 3 months postoperatively was significantly less than in the chisel group. However, a few cases of paralysis did not recover even in the piezo group. Blood loss and osteotomy time did not correlate with the paralysis. This study demonstrates that while piezoelectric surgery does impact the nerve tissue, the use of piezoelectric surgery in BSSRO leads to significantly less long term paralysis compared to surgery done by chisel.

Rate of Relapse After Enucleation of Solid/Multicystic Ameloblastoma Followed by Piezoelectric or Conventional Peripheral Ostectomy.

The use of piezo surgery is characterized by a good cutting ability associated with a higher soft tissues respect. Such skills have led to an increment of the use of such systematic in the clinical practice. The aim of this study was to figure out whether the use of piezo surgery may show clinical advantages when enucleation is followed by peripheral ostectomy for the treatment of solid/multicystic ameloblastoma. A retrospective case-control study was performed, including patients treated with piezo surgery or conventional drilling in a single center in Italy. Results of this investigation revealed a lower rate of relapse, at 5 years' follow-up for patients treated with piezo surgery. Although characterized by low power of evidences, the results of this investigation encourage the development of further studies related to the use of piezo surgery for the treatment of solid/multicystic ameloblastoma.

Comparison of clinical outcomes using a Piezosurgery device vs. a conventional osteotome for lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty.

Our aim for this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent lateral osteotomy with a Piezosurgery device or a conventional osteotome in open-technique rhinoplasty. This cohort trial involved 65 patients (36 women and 29 men; average age: 23.6 ± 5.71 yr) who underwent surgery between May 2015 and January 2016. Piezosurgery was used for lateral osteotomy in 32 patients, whereas 33 patients underwent conventional external osteotomy. These 2 groups were compared for duration of surgery, perioperative bleeding, postoperative edema, ecchymosis, pain, and patient satisfaction on the first and seventh postoperative days. The Piezosurgery group revealed significantly more favorable outcomes in terms of edema, ecchymosis, and hemorrhage on the first day postoperatively (p < 0.001 for all). Similarly, edema (p = 0.005) and ecchymosis (p < 0.001) on the seventh postoperative day also were better in the Piezosurgery group. Hemorrhage was similar in both groups on the seventh postoperative day (p = 0.67). The Piezosurgery group not only experienced less pain on the first postoperative day (p < 0.001), but these patients also were more satisfied with their results on both the first and seventh postoperative days. Results of the present study imply that Piezosurgery may be a promising, safe, and effective method for lateral osteotomy, a critical step in rhinoplasty. The time interval necessary for the learning curve is counteracted by the comfort and satisfaction of both patients and surgeons.

Piezoelectric versus conventional techniques for orthognathic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of complications after orthognathic surgery comparing piezo-surgery with conventional osteotomy. METHODS: We conducted this study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Lilacs, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and OpenThesis to identify randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs and nRCTs, respectively) comparing patient outcomes (operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative swelling, pain, neurosensitivity) after orthognathic surgery by piezoelectric or conventional osteotomy. We pooled individual results of continuous and dichotomous outcome data using the mean difference (MD) and risk difference (RD) with the 95% confidence interval, respectively. RESULTS: Three RCTs and five nRCTs were selected. No difference in operative time was observed between piezo-surgery and conventional osteotomies. We found a decrease of intraoperative blood loss with piezo-surgery (MD -128 mL; P < 0.001) and a pooled difference in severe blood loss of 35% (P = 0.008) favouring piezo-surgery. Based on pooled individual results of studies evaluating neurosensitivity by clinical neurosensory testing, our meta-analysis showed a pooled difference in severe nerve disturbance of 25% (P < 0.0001) favouring piezo-surgery. Test for subgroup differences (I2 = 26.6%) indicated that follow-up time may have an effect on neurosensory disturbance. We found differences between piezo-surgery and conventional osteotomy at 3 months (RD 28%; P < 0.001) and 6 months (RD 15%; P = 0.001) after surgery. Meta-analyses for pain and swelling were not performed because of a lack of sufficient studies. CONCLUSION: Currently available evidence suggests that piezo-surgery has favorable effects on complications associated with orthognathic surgery, including reductions in intraoperative blood loss and severe nerve disturbance.