Aeromedical Implications of Cerebral Cavernomas.

BACKGROUND: Cavernomas, cavernous angiomas, or cerebral cavernous malformations are clusters of endothelium-lined blood vessels usually found in the brain. With the increasing use of radiological imaging, these are being detected incidentally in asymptomatic aircrew. The UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) experience of cavernomas is described and the aeromedical concerns, that is, the risk of epilepsy, hemorrhage, and the development of a neurological deficit, are considered.METHODS: A search of the CAA database between 1990 and 2020 was performed for the term cavernoma. The gender, age at diagnosis, class of certification held, clinical presentation, location, and size of the lesion were noted. A PubMed literature review for papers with complications of cavernoma was performed.RESULTS: Six cases of cavernoma have been declared to the CAA: five professional pilots and one private pilot. Five were men and one was a woman. The age range was between 38 and 60 yr, with a mean of 48 yr. Two cases presented with clinical symptoms and four were asymptomatic. Complication rates for seizure and hemorrhage were extracted from the published literature together with the significance of other factors such as cavernoma size, family history, multiplicity, and the development of new lesions.DISCUSSION: A policy for the medical certification of aircrew with cavernomas that have presented with clinical symptoms and those that are detected incidentally is proposed.Jagathesan T, OBrien M. Aeromedical implications of cerebral cavernomas. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(2):120123.

Technological innovation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) as a tool for commercial aviation pilots with insulin-treated diabetes and stakeholders/regulators: A new chance to improve the directives?

Civil aviation pilots who develop insulin-treated diabetes and want to renew a Commercial Pilot License (CPL) represent a medical, social and regulatory problem. This depends on justified concerns about hypoglycemia, the most threatening event for people who carry out jobs requiring a high level of concentration and reliability. This negatively affects social and working aspects of pilots' lives, who have a high profile and a high-cost professional qualification. It could be possible now to revise this attitude thanks to the availability of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices. CGM clearly showed to prevent hypoglycemic events in insulin-treated diabetic patients by allowing strict monitoring and trend prediction of glucose levels. By systematizing available data on such devices and present regulations in CPL issuance worldwide, our review can be used as handy tool for a fruitful discussion among the scientific community, national and international civil aviation regulators, stakeholders and pilots, aimed at evaluating the evidence-based opportunity to revise CPL issuance criteria for insulin-treated diabetic pilots. For the above-mentioned reasons, there are, among the regulatory administrations of Civil Aviation around the globe, several different approaches and limitations set for the subjects with insulin-treated diabetes who want to obtain, or renew, a CPL.

Pilots' Visual Scanning Behaviors During an Instrument Landing System Approach.

BACKGROUND: Since eye movement can provide a reliable index of the attention allocation, which can assist in understanding pilots' cognitive state, this study investigated the effect of pilots' experience and the autopilot mode on their attention allocation on the Primary Flight Display (PFD) and Multi-Function Display (MFD) during an approach task.METHODS: There were 16 pilots who were classified into two levels of aviation expertise depending on the flight hours, and required to fly an Instrument Landing System approach. Their visual scanning behaviors were recorded through an eye tracker and analyzed based on fixation number and dwell time.RESULTS: The results revealed that the pilot experience level, instrument panel and autopilot mode all had significant impact on the fixation time ratio and dwell time. The pilots fixated most often on the PFD and had shorter dwell time. Furthermore, they had a lower fixation number and shorter dwell time on the PFD and MFD when the autopilot was off that they should allocate visual resources to the others (e.g., out-of-the-window) and obtain more information to maintain overall situation awareness under higher time pressure. Compared to pilots with more expertise, pilots with less expertise had an increased fixation number and decreased dwell time on the airspeed after turning off the autopilot.DISCUSSION: The present study indicated that the pilots had different visual scanning modes according to the flight mode and their experience. We expect that pilots' visual scanning behaviors during tasks will help the training and the design of the human-machine interaction.Lu Y, Zheng Y, Wang Z, Fu S. Pilots' visual scanning behaviors during an instrument landing system approach. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020; 91(6):511-517.

Vigilance Aid Use and Aircraft Carrier Landing Performance in Pilots of Tactical Aircraft.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a well-known hazard in aviation. In military fighter communities, policies have evolved to allow for in-flight use of pharmacological vigilance aids to counteract the negative effects of fatigue. With limited objective evidence supporting the role of these medications in continuous flight operations, the present study seeks to evaluate whether use of modafinil is associated with pilot aircraft carrier landing performance.METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was completed following carrier-based flight operations in support of Operation Inherent Resolve. All graded landing passes were included in the analysis. Mixed-effect multivariate linear regression analysis was utilized for the primary outcome of landing signal officer grade of landing performance following combat sorties for events with reported in-flight use of modafinil.RESULTS: A total of 1122 sorties were flown by 79 different pilots with an average landing pass grade of 3.86. The primary outcome of modafinil use in-flight was not generally associated with landing performance. In a subset analysis of more senior ranked aviators, modafinil use appeared to offer a relative performance improvement back to baseline (+0.19). Secondary outcome analysis revealed landing performance was associated with advanced landing technologies (+0.25), sorties later in deployment (+0.05 per 30 d), total career carrier landings (+0.03 per 100 traps), and longer mission duration (-0.04 per hour).DISCUSSION: In the context of evidence supporting subjective benefits of vigilance aid use by aircrew, the results of this study provide ample objective support to the controlled use of modafinil in the operational environment.Schallhorn CS. Vigilance aid use and aircraft carrier landing performance in pilots of tactical aircraft. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020; 91(6):518-524.

Flight safety assessment based on an integrated human reliability quantification approach.

Human error is an important risk factor for flight safety. Although the human error assessment and reduction technique (HEART) is an available tool for human reliability derivation, it has not been applied in flight safety assessment. The traditional HEART suffers from imprecise calculation of the assessed proportion of affect (APOA) because it heavily depends on a single expert's judgment. It also fails to provide remedial measures for flight safety problems. To overcome these defects of the HEART, this study proposes an integrated human error quantification approach that uses the improved analytic hierarchy process method to determine the APOA values. Then, these values are fused to the HEART method to derive the human error probability. A certain flight task is completed to assess human reliability. The results demonstrate that the proposed method is a reasonable and feasible tool for quantifying human error probability and assessing flight safety in the aircraft manipulation process. In addition, the critical error-producing conditions influencing flight safety are identified, and improvement measures for high-error-rate operations are provided. The proposed method is useful for reducing the possibility of human error and enhancing flight safety levels in aircraft operation processes.

Medical Cases Adjudicated by the Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada: 2000-2018.

INTRODUCTION: In Canada, aviators and seafarers are required to be medically fit by international and domestic standards to be issued a medical certificate by Transport Canada (TC). In the event of denial or restriction, individuals have the right to a review by an independent decision-maker with medical expertise/training in marine and/or aviation medicine. This paper presents the results of cases submitted to the Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada over 19 yr.METHODS: The Tribunal's repository of medical records was searched and 112 adjudicated cases were reviewed.RESULTS: Since 2000, 55 (49%) cases were in the aviation sector and, since 2010, 57 (51%) cases were in the marine sector. The mean age of applicants was 49 and 54 yr for seafarers and pilots, respectively. Mental illness, cardiovascular disease, visual, and neurological disease were the most common reasons for a medical certificate restriction/denial. The Tribunal upheld the refusal to issue or renew a medical certificate in 89 (79%) cases and 23 (21%) cases were referred back to TC.CONCLUSIONS: Mental illness is the most frequent diagnosis that precipitates a request. The international literature is sparse on the number, causes, and results of the appeal process. Our findings and the application of the medical standards in Canada are generally comparable with those of the United Kingdom. It was not possible to make more than indirect comparisons to those of the United States.Brooks C, MacDonald C. Medical cases adjudicated by the Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada: 2000-2018. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020; 91(2):79-85.

Association of Medical Certification Factors with All-Cause Mortality in U.S. Aviators.

INTRODUCTION: The value of aeromedical certification in reducing adverse medical outcomes is an especially important question for this era of increasing flight operations that do not require an FAA medical certificate. The study of this question has previously been thwarted by a lack of information about pilots when their medical certificates are not renewed.METHODS: We matched airmen in the FAA medical certification database to the U.S. Social Security Death Index to identify date of death for deceased pilots. Logistic regression models were used to explore associations of certification data with odds of death while holding a medical certificate and within 4 yr of expiration of a medical certificate.RESULTS: FAA aeromedical waivers were associated with 33% lower odds of death while holding a medical certificate and 35% increased odds of death within 4 yr after expiration of a medical certificate. Denial was associated with 21% increased odds of death in the next 4 yr. Only 13 of 47 medical conditions having significant associations were associated with increased odds of death during certification.DISCUSSION: We found that FAA aeromedical certification reduces the odds of death while holding a medical certificate compared to the 4 yr after certificate expiration. We believe this helps provide a positive answer to the question of whether medical certification reduces medically related events.Mills WD, Greenhaw RM. Association of medical certification factors with all-cause mortality in U.S. aviators. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019; 90(11):938-944.

U.S. Statement of Demonstrated Ability Aeromedical Waivers.

INTRODUCTION: The Statement of Demonstrated Ability (SODA) is a type of U.S. aeromedical waiver used for disqualifying conditions that are not expected to change. About 21,000 (2%) U.S. pilots possess a SODA waiver.METHODS: We matched all pilot medical exams from the FAA's medical certification database from 2002 through 2011 to their respective accidents in the National Transportation Safety Board accident database. The association of SODA waivers and SODA conditions with the odds of an accident were explored using logistic regression techniques.RESULTS: For 3rd class flight exams, the presence of a SODA waiver was not associated with the odds of an accident. For the 1st and 2nd class exams, the accident odds ratio (OR = 1.45) was statistically significant. Crop dusting operations accounted for 17 of the 40 accidents where SODAs were present and returned a significant accident OR = 1.68. SODAs were not associated with the odds of accidents during other commercial operations. Six SODA conditions (amputation, internal eye, external eye, visual fields, bone and joint, and miscellaneous) were also found to have elevated ORs but were based on very small accident counts. NTSB investigators and the authors reviewed all accidents and none thought the SODA condition to be contributory.DISCUSSION: SODA waivers were not associated with increased accident odds except for crop dusting operations. Six specific SODA conditions also had elevated odds of an accident, but there was no evidence they contributed to the accidents. Overall, U.S. pilots with SODA waivers appear to have a satisfactory safety record.Mills WD, Davis JT. U.S. Statement of Demonstrated Ability aeromedical waivers. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019; 90(12):1034-1040.

Aviation Accident Causes Among Sport Pilots as Compared to Class 3 Private Pilots from 2004-2017.

BACKGROUND: In September 2004 a new pilot certificate, sport pilot, was established, which enabled pilots to fly with a valid driver's license in lieu of a valid third-class medical certificate. In 2016 Mills and DeJohn published a paper in which they demonstrated that sport pilots had a higher accident rate than private pilots with Class 3 medical certificates. They concluded that this privilege should not be extended to a broader range of pilots due to the higher accident rate. They failed to investigate why these pilots crashed. This short communication aims to fill that gap.METHODS: The NTSB database was reviewed for the entire period that sport pilot has been available, and reasons for the accidents were determined, both for sport pilots and private pilots with Class 3 medicals.RESULTS: Sport pilot accidents were caused by medical incapacitation 3.7% of the time. Private pilots with Class 3 medicals had accidents that cited medical incapacitation 2.5% of the time.DISCUSSION: Medical incapacitation represents either a probable cause or contributing factor in aviation accidents less than 5% of the time. There is a slightly higher rate of this incapacitation among pilots not receiving regular aeromedical evaluations, but the difference was not statistically significant.Mulvey JR. Aviation accident causes among sport pilots as compared to Class 3 private pilots from 2004-2017. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(11):1002-1004.

The U.S. Experience with Special Issuance Waivers.

INTRODUCTION: The special issuance (SI) waiver is the primary mechanism for U.S. pilots who do not meet FAA standards to obtain a medical certificate. About 34,000 pilots possess an SI waiver, but there is a large gap in knowledge of the relationship of SI waivers to aviation safety. METHODS: All FAA pilot medical exams from 2002 through 2011 were matched to the National Transportation Safety Board accident database. The association of an SI waiver with accidents was explored using logistic regression models. Accident rates were also calculated using a novel technique based on pilots' reported flight times on their applications for medical certification. RESULTS: For third-class flight exams overall, the presence of an SI waiver is associated with 8.7% lower odds of an accident than regular issuance exams. The calculated overall accident rate was 6.6 per 100,000 h. For the first and second-class exams, there was no significant association of SI waivers with safety for the overall group. The oldest and youngest pilots in the third-class group and the younger pilots in the first and second-class groups had somewhat elevated accident odds. The significance of these higher odds is uncertain, especially for the younger pilots who have a probable flight time bias. DISCUSSION: The overall FAA program of special issuance waivers shows no detrimental effect on aviation accidents and enables a large number of pilots to safely continue their aviation pursuits in spite of failure to meet specific regulatory medical standards.Mills WD, Davis JT. The U.S. experience with special issuance waivers. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(10):905-911.

Aeromedical Certification Following Mechanical Aortic and Mitral Valve Implants in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: For many years, anticoagulant therapy had been deemed unacceptable for civilian pilot medical certification in the United Kingdom under the Joint Aviation Authorities Requirements and, therefore, mechanical valve implants were disqualifying. In 2012, this restriction was removed by implementation of the European Union requirements. This study was undertaken to assess the medical evidence available to develop a certificatory policy following mechanical valve implants in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A literature review was performed for complication rates following the implantation of mechanical aortic and mitral valves. This study was confined to the three major types of valve commonly used in current clinical practice: the ATS, the Carbomedics, and the St. Jude Medical valves. RESULTS: We identified 28 papers on aortic valve replacements and 22 papers on mitral valve replacements. Data were extracted for the late complication rates for endocarditis, paravalvular leak, thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and structural valve dysfunction. The total calculated incidence of a late complication was 3.8% per annum for aortic valves over a mean follow-up period of 57 mo and 5.2% per annum for mitral valves over a mean follow-up period of 61 mo. Both of these exceed the maximum 1% per annum medical incapacitation risk considered acceptable for professional multicrew pilot operations. CONCLUSION: Confounders and sources of error in estimating the risks and methods to mitigate these are considered. A certificatory policy is proposed and the UK experience of mechanical valve replacements is described.Jagathesan T, O'Nunain S, O'Brien M. Aeromedical certification following mechanical aortic and mitral valve implants in the United Kingdom. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(10):912-917.

Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome and Vestibular Dysfunction Disqualify a Military Student Pilot.

BACKGROUND: Humans detect motion and gravity via the labyrinthine system of the inner ear, which consists of the vestibule and the semicircular canals. The vestibular system provides three major functions for maintaining balance and orientation. First, it maximizes the effectiveness of the visual system. Second, it provides orientational information necessary for performing both skilled and reflexive motor activities. Third, in the absence of vision, the vestibular system provides a reasonably accurate perception of motion and position. Although these organs provide important cues for basic orientation on the ground, they often provide misleading information during flight. A superior semicircular canal dehiscence can cause an individual to experience disorientation and vertigo-like symptoms. CASE REPORT: A 30-yr-old male student pilot experienced airsickness on his first several flights in the T-6A Texan II aircraft. Airsickness is common among student pilots in the early stages of flight training; however, the subject pilot's symptoms lasted well beyond the normal 24 h, and included vertiginous symptoms lasting days after his last flight. His persistent symptoms required he be held out of training for further evaluation. Comprehensive vestibular and audiological testing were normal; however, a CT scan of the temporal bones showed a left superior semicircular canal dehiscence, and he was diagnosed with left labyrinthine fistula as the cause of his vertigo. He was medically eliminated from pilot training and permanently disqualified from U.S. Air Force flying duties. DISCUSSION: Spatial disorientation remains one of the deadliest factors related to aircraft mishaps every year. In this case, an abnormal presentation of airsickness that prompted further evaluation may have prevented a dangerous situation in the air. In standard airsickness, the goal is to keep the pilot flying to expedite adaptation, so this case highlights the importance of distinguishing between normal airsickness and a spatially disorienting medical condition.Dreibelbis JA, Organ BE. Semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome and vestibular dysfunction disqualify a military student pilot. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(10):923-926.

The influence of trait mindfulness on incident involvement among Chinese airline pilots: The role of risk perception and flight experience.

Introduction The primary objective of this study is to investigate the relationships between trait mindfulness, risk perception, flight experience, and incident involvement among Chinese airline pilots. Method The study used a sample consisting of 295 commercial airline pilots from China Southern Airlines Ltd. Results The results show that trait mindfulness has a direct and negative effect on airline pilots' incident involvement, and an indirect effect on incident involvement through influencing risk perception. Flight experience was also found to strengthen the negative and direct effect of trait mindfulness on incident involvement. Practical applications The practical implications of the study include recommendations as to injury prevention efforts in incident involvement. Future research directions are also discussed.

General Aviation Accidents Involving Octogenarian Airmen: Implications for Medical Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: No upper age limit exists at which general aviation pilots are disallowed from exercising their flying privileges. Operating an aircraft, and landing in particular, requires high visual acuity, cognitive function, and eye-hand/foot coordination; i.e., functions which commonly deteriorate with age. No studies have addressed flight safety of airmen ≥ 80 yr of age (octogenarian+ or 80+) or whether such airmen are more landing accident-prone. This research seeks to answer these questions. METHODS: Accidents and private pilot-certificated airmen counts were obtained from the National Transport Safety Board accident database and the U.S. Civil Airmen Statistics, respectively. Contingency tables were used to determine differences in proportions. A Poisson distribution was employed to determine whether airmen count (80+ and 30-39 yr) and their accident rates differed over time. Differences in median values were tested with a Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The proportion of airmen 80+ years doubled and their accident rate increased (6 and 11 mishaps/1000 airmen, respectively) between 2002 and 2016. Landing accidents were over-represented for octogenarian+ pilots compared with airmen 30-39 yr (31 and 17%, respectively) and did not reflect inferior experience but were often due to an aircraft flaring deficiency. The proportion of fatal accidents was comparable (11 and 13%, respectively) for the older and younger age cohorts. CONCLUSION: A growing population and a climbing accident rate for octogenarian+ airmen were evident. The disproportionate count of pilots involved in landing mishaps raises a concern for an increase in such mishaps for octogenarian airmen opting for BasicMed due to less restrictive/frequent visual acuity tests.Boyd DD. General aviation accidents involving octogenarian airmen: implications for medical evaluation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(8):687-692.

A comparative study on the frequency of simulation-based training and assessment of non-technical skills in the Norwegian ground ambulance services and helicopter emergency medical services.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate non-technical skills (NTSs) among employees in the Norwegian prehospital emergency medical services (EMSs) are a risk for patient and operational safety. Simulation-based training and assessment is promising with respect to improving NTSs. The frequency of simulation-based training in and assessment of NTSs among crewmembers in the Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) has gained increased attention over recent years, whereas there has been much less focus on the Norwegian ground emergency medical service (GEMS). The aim of the study was to compare and document the frequencies of simulation-based training in and assessment of seven NTSs between the Norwegian HEMS and GEMS, conditional on workplace and occupation. METHOD: A comparative study of the results from cross-sectional questionnaires responded to by employees in the Norwegian prehospital EMSs in 2016 regarding training in and assessment of NTSs during 2015, with a focus on the Norwegian GEMS and HEMS. Professional groups of interest are: pilots, HEMS crew members (HCMs), physicians, paramedics, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), EMT apprentices, nurses and nurses with an EMT licence. RESULTS: The frequency of simulation-based training in and assessment of seven generic NTSs was statistically significantly greater for HEMS than for GEMS during 2015. Compared with pilots and HCMs, other health care providers in GEMS and HEMS undergo statistically significantly less frequent simulation-based training in and assessment of NTSs. Physicians working in the HEMS appear to be undergoing training and assessment more frequently than the rest of the health trust employees. The study indicates a tendency for lesser focus on the assessment of NTSs compared to simulation-based training. CONCLUSION: HEMS has become superior to GEMS, in terms of frequency of training in and assessment of NTSs. The low frequency of training in and assessment of NTSs in GEMS suggests that there is a great potential to learn from HEMS and to strengthen the focus on NTSs. Increased frequency of assessment of NTSs in both HEMS and GEMS is called for.

Duty of Notification and Aviation Safety-A Study of Fatal Aviation Accidents in the United States in 2015.

After the Germanwings accident, the French Safety Investigation Authority (BEA) recommended that the World Health Organization (WHO) and European Community (EC) develop clear rules for the duty of notification process. Aeromedical practitioners (AMEs) face a dilemma when considering the duty of notification and conflicts between pilot privacy and public and third-party safety. When balancing accountability, knowledge of the duty of notification process, legislation and the clarification of a doctor’s own set of values should be assessed a priori. Relatively little is known of the magnitude of this problem in aviation safety. To address this, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) database was searched to identify fatal accidents during 2015 in the United States in which a deceased pilot used a prescribed medication or had a disease that potentially reduced pilot performance and was not reported to the AME. Altogether, 202 finalized accident reports with toxicology were available from (the year) 2015. In 5% (10/202) of these reports, the pilot had either a medication or a disease not reported to an AME which according to the accident investigation was causal to the fatal accident. In addition, the various approaches to duty of notification in aviation in New Zealand, Finland and Norway are discussed. The process of notification of authorities without a pilot’s express permission needs to be carried out by using a guidance protocol that works within legislation and professional responsibilities to address the pilot and the public, as well as the healthcare provider. Professional guidance defining this duty of notification is urgently needed.

Assessment of Muscular Fitness as a Predictor of Flight Duty Limitation.

Introduction: The high acceleration (Gz) exposure among military pilots flying fighter aircraft has been associated with an increased risk for cervical and lumbar disorders. It has been suggested that an adequate level of physical performance could reduce the risk of experiencing these disorders. The Finnish Air Force has for several years used aerobic (bicycle ergometer) and muscular fitness tests (battery of five tests) in the selection process of military pilot candidates in order to evaluate their physical fitness level. The aim of the study was to determine if these selection phase tests and anthropometry measures can predispose those individuals who might be at risk of developing severe spinal disorders leading to permanent flight duty limitations later during their military pilots' career. Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 23 pilots flying with Gz limitation (+2 Gz, +4 Gz or +5 Gz) due to spinal disorders and 50 experienced (+1,000 flight hours) symptomless controls flying actively in operative missions. Data obtained retrospectively for all subjects included anthropometry, physical (aerobic and muscular fitness) test results and self-reported physical activity levels at a pilot selection phase. Aerobic fitness was measured with a maximal ergometer test and muscular endurance was evaluated with a test battery (standing long jump, pull-ups, sit-ups, back extensions, and push-up tests). Results: Fighter pilots flying without Gz limitation had significantly better mean (±SE) results in pull-up (14.4 ± 4.2 vs. 11.5 ± 2.0, p < 0.05) and back extension (71.1 ± 14.1 vs. 60.0 ± 12.2, p < 0.05) tests during the pilot selection when compared with the limited pilots. Similarly, the non-limited pilots had a better total muscular fitness test score (13.7 ± 1.7 vs. 12.4 ± 1.6, p < 0.05) during the pilot selection. They had also participated in significantly more competitive sports (54% vs. 22%, p < 0.05) at the time of selection when compared with pilots flying with Gz limitation due to spinal disorders. The aerobic fitness test results and anthropometric measures were not statistically different among the groups. Conclusions: Higher levels of muscular fitness, particularly axial strength in military pilot selection may have a protective role for reducing spinal disorders which if developed, can often lead to limiting the availability of pilots for flight duty. The present findings also do not support the assumption that aerobic fitness above the required minimum level would protect pilots from developing spinal disorders and, therefore, from limiting flight duty.

Understanding Human Error in Naval Aviation Mishaps.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the external factors that influence the performance and decisions of aviators involved in Naval aviation mishaps. BACKGROUND: Mishaps in complex activities, ranging from aviation to nuclear power operations, are often the result of interactions between multiple components within an organization. The Naval aviation mishap database contains relevant information, both in quantitative statistics and qualitative reports, that permits analysis of such interactions to identify how the working atmosphere influences aviator performance and judgment. METHOD: Results from 95 severe Naval aviation mishaps that occurred from 2011 through 2016 were analyzed using Bayes' theorem probability formula. Then a content analysis was performed on a subset of relevant mishap reports. RESULTS: Out of the 14 latent factors analyzed, the Bayes' application identified 6 that impacted specific aspects of aviator behavior during mishaps. Technological environment, misperceptions, and mental awareness impacted basic aviation skills. The remaining 3 factors were used to inform a content analysis of the contextual information within mishap reports. Teamwork failures were the result of plan continuation aggravated by diffused responsibility. Resource limitations and risk management deficiencies impacted judgments made by squadron commanders. CONCLUSION: The application of Bayes' theorem to historical mishap data revealed the role of latent factors within Naval aviation mishaps. Teamwork failures were seen to be considerably damaging to both aviator skill and judgment. APPLICATION: Both the methods and findings have direct application for organizations interested in understanding the relationships between external factors and human error. It presents real-world evidence to promote effective safety decisions.

To fly as a pilot after cardiac surgery.

Aircrew are responsible for safe and reliable aircraft operations. Cardiovascular disease accounts for 50% of all pilot licences declined or withdrawn for medical reasons in Western Europe and is the most common cases of sudden incapacitation in flight. Aircrew retirement age is increasing (up to age 65) in a growing number of airlines and the burden of subclinical, but potentially significant, coronary atherosclerosis is unknown in qualified pilots above age 40. Safety considerations are paramount in aviation medicine, and the most dreaded cardiovascular complications are thromboembolic events and rhythm disturbances due to their potential for sudden incapacitation. In aviation, the current consensus risk threshold for an acceptable level of controlled risk of acute incapacitation is 1% (for dual pilot commercial operations), a percentage calculated using engineering principles to ensure the incidence of a fatal air accident is no greater than 1 per 107 h of flying. This is known as the '1% safety rule'. To fly as a pilot after cardiac surgery is possible; however, special attention to perioperative planning is mandatory. Choice of procedure is crucial for license renewal. Licensing restrictions are likely to apply and the postoperative follow-up requires a tight scheduling. The cardiac surgeon should always liaise and communicate with the pilot's aviation medicine examiner prior to and following cardiac surgery.

Concurrent Pilot Instrument Monitoring in the Automated Multi-Crew Airline Cockpit.

INTRODUCTION: Pilot instrument monitoring has been described as "inadequate," "ineffective," and "insufficient" after multicrew aircraft accidents. Regulators have called for improved instrument monitoring by flight crews, but scientific knowledge in the area is scarce. Research has tended to investigate the monitoring of individual pilots when in the pilot-flying role; very little research has looked at crew monitoring, or that of the "monitoring-pilot" role despite it being half of the apparent problem. METHODS: Eye-tracking data were collected from 17 properly constituted and current Boeing 737 crews operating in a full motion simulator. Each crew flew four realistic flight segments, with pilots swapping between the pilot-flying and pilot-monitoring roles, with and without the autopilot engaged. Analysis was performed on the 375 maneuvering-segments prior to localizer intercept. RESULTS: Autopilot engagement led to significantly less visual dwell time on the attitude director indicator (mean 212.8-47.8 s for the flying pilot and 58.5-39.8 s for the monitoring-pilot) and an associated increase on the horizontal situation indicator (18-52.5 s and 36.4-50.5 s). DISCUSSION: The flying-pilots' withdrawal of attention from the primary flight reference and increased attention to the primary navigational reference was paralleled rather than complemented by the monitoring-pilot, suggesting that monitoring vulnerabilities can be duplicated in the flight deck. Therefore it is possible that accident causes identified as "inadequate" or "insufficient" monitoring, are in fact a result of parallel monitoring.Jarvis SR. Concurrent pilot instrument monitoring in the automated multi-crew airline cockpit. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(12):1100-1106.