Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
1.
Minerva Surg ; 79(3): 286-292, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38385798

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Large hiatal hernias (LHH) account for 5-10% of all hiatal hernias. Surgery of LHH should be associated with low rates of postoperative complications and recurrences, to guarantee a favorable quality of life (QoL). Data on long-term results of laparoscopic repair of LHH are lacking. The objective of our study is to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic LHH management in a high-volume experienced center. METHODS: Patients who had undergone elective laparoscopic repair of LHH between January 1992 and December 2008 at the Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy were included. Preoperative and intraoperative data were collected from patients' charts. Patients were clinically evaluated at long-term postoperative follow-up to assess control of symptoms, degree of satisfaction with surgery, and QoL. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 240 months (range 168-348), 81 patients were available for clinical evaluation. Severe heartburn was reported by six patients (7.4%), while severe post-prandial epigastric pain by three (3.7%). Recurrent coughing episodes were described by six patients (7.4%), while occasional mild episodes of transient dysphagia by 13 (16%). No gas bloat detected. Proton Pump Inhibitors were taken by 22 patients (27.2%) to control symptoms. The Modified Italian Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (MI-GERD-HRQL) score decreased significantly from 40 to 7 (P<0.0001) postoperatively. Satisfaction was achieved in 76 patients (93.8%) with an average satisfaction index of 8.6 (IQR 8-10). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic LHH repair is effective when performed in a specialized center, with long-lasting significant improvements of symptoms and QoL.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal , Herniorrafia , Laparoscopía , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Herniorrafia/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pirosis/cirugía , Pirosis/etiología
2.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 34(2): 143-149, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38421213

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The antireflux surgical technique with the RefluxStop device is one of the latest approaches to treating patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic hiatal hernia (HH) repair with the RefluxStop device in patients with GERD and concurrent large HH (≥4 cm). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for the first 30 patients with a large HH who consented and underwent HH surgery with the RefluxStop device. The operative technique and outcomes were evaluated to assess safety and feasibility, HH recurrence, dysphagia, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Between May 2020 and April 2022, 30 patients underwent laparoscopic HH repair with the RefluxStop device. All patients had typical symptoms of GERD, such as heartburn and regurgitation, and 15 patients (50%) had preoperative dysphagia. Median HH size was 5 cm (interquartile range, 4 to 5). Median operating time was 56 minutes (interquartile range, 52 to 63), with no intra and postoperative complications related to the device. One patient required laparotomy due to adhesions and associated bleeding when accessing the abdomen. All patients had postoperative imaging (video fluoroscopy) on postoperative day 1 and at 3 months, confirming the correct location of the RefluxStop device. One patient (3.3%) needed postoperative balloon dilatation due to severe dysphagia. Reflux symptoms (heartburn and acid regurgitation) resolved significantly in all patients ( P < 0.001) at 6 months. One episode of recurrence of HH (3.3%) occurred during the follow-up period of 6 months. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the short-term safety and feasibility of laparoscopic HH repair with the RefluxStop device in patients with large HH, with a low rate of postoperative dysphagia and subsequent improvement or resolution of reflux symptoms in all patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Hernia Hiatal , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Pirosis/complicaciones , Pirosis/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Surg Endosc ; 38(2): 659-670, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38012444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) is an established treatment for achalasia cardia. Anti-reflux procedures (ARP) are recommended with LHM to reduce the post-operative reflux though the optimal anti-reflux procedure is still debatable. This study reports on the long-term outcomes of LHM with Angle-of-His accentuation (AOH) in patients of achalasia cardia. METHODS: One hundred thirty-six patients of achalasia cardia undergoing LHM with AOH between January 2010 to October 2021 with a minimum follow-up of one year were evaluated for symptomatic outcomes using Eckardt score (ES), DeMeester heartburn (DMH) score and achalasia disease specific quality of life (A-DsQoL) questionnaire. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, high resolution manometry (HRM) and timed barium esophagogram (TBE) were performed when feasible and rates of esophagitis and improvement in HRM and TBE parameters evaluated. Time dependent rates of success were calculated with respect to improvement in ES and dysphagia-, regurgitation- and heartburn-free survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 65.5 months, the overall success (ES ≤ 3) was 94.1%. There was statistically significant improvement in ES, heartburn score and A-DsQoL score (p < 0.00001, p = 0.002 and p < 0.00001). Significant heartburn (score ≥ 2) was seen in 12.5% subjects with 9.5% patients reporting frequent PPI use (> 3 days per week). LA-B and above esophagitis was seen in 12.7%. HRM and TBE parameters also showed a significant improvement as compared to pre-operative values (IRP: p < 0.0001, column height: p < 0.0001, column width: p = 0.0002). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed dysphagia, regurgitation, and heartburn free survival of 75%, 96.2% and 72.3% respectively at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: LHM with AOH gives a lasting relief of symptoms in patients of achalasia cardia with heartburn rates similar to that reported in studies using Dor's or Toupet's fundoplication with LHM. Hence, LHM with AOH may be a preferred choice in patients of achalasia cardia given the simplicity of the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Acalasia del Esófago , Esofagitis , Miotomía de Heller , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Pirosis/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Miotomía de Heller/métodos , Cardias/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Laparoscopía/métodos , Esofagitis/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Int J Surg ; 109(11): 3312-3321, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37566907

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the gold standard surgical intervention for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). LNF can be followed by recurrent symptoms or complications affecting patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to assess the value of the intraoperative endomanometric evaluation of esophagogastric competence and pressure combined with LNF in patients with large sliding hiatus hernia (>5 cm) with severe GERD (DeMeester score >100). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Baseline characteristics, postoperative dysphagia and gas bloat syndrome, recurrent symptoms, and satisfaction were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes analyzed included recurrent reflux symptoms, postoperative side effects, and satisfaction with surgery. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty patients were stratified into endomanometric LNF (180 patients, LNF+) and LNF alone (180 patients, LNF). Recurrent heartburn (3.9 vs. 8.3%) and recurrent regurgitation (2.2 vs. 5%) showed a lower incidence in the LNF+ group ( P =0.012). Postoperative score III recurrent heartburn and score III regurgitations occurred in 0 vs. 3.3% and 0 vs. 2.8% cases in the LNF+ and LNF groups, respectively ( P =0.005). Postoperative persistent dysphagia and gas bloat syndrome occurred in 1.75 vs. 5.6% and 0 vs. 3.9% of patients ( P =0.001). Score III postoperative persistent dysphagia was 0 vs. 2.8% in the two groups ( P =0.007). There was no redo surgery for dysphagia after LNF+. Patient satisfaction at the end of the study was 93.3 vs. 86.7% in both cohorts, respectively ( P =0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative high-resolution manometry and endoscopic were feasible in all patients, and the outcomes were favorable from an effectiveness and safety standpoint.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Hernia Hiatal , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pirosis/etiología , Pirosis/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Clin Obes ; 13(5): e12618, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37583310

RESUMEN

We investigated whether adding gastropexy to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) reduced gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients operated for severe obesity, assessed mainly by use of anti-reflux medication (ARM) and second operations due to GERD worsening. In a prospective non-randomized study, patients undergoing SG at two Norwegian hospitals were included from 2011 to 2015 and followed for 7 years. GERD was defined by regular use of ARM, and epigastric pain and heartburn were measured by the Rome II questionnaire. Gastropexy was done by suturing the gastrocolic ligament to the staple line. Patients undergoing SG only, mainly before gastropexia was introduced in 2013, were compared to those with additional gastropexy from 2013 onwards. Of 376 included patients (75% females, mean age 42.6 years and BMI 42.9 kg/m2 ), 350 (93%) and 232 (62%) were available for evaluation after 1 and 7 years, respectively. Baseline characteristics in the no-gastropexy (n = 235) and gastropexy groups (n = 141) were similar. In patients without ARM use before surgery, the use increased and in those that used ARM at baseline, the proportion decreased, with no difference in the no-gastropexy and gastropexy groups. With a combined endpoint of ARM use and/or second operation for GERD, there was no difference during follow-up between the two groups. With time, adding gastropexy did not reduce symptoms of GERD significantly. In this population, adding gastropexy to SG did not reduce use of ARM and/or second operation for uncontrolled GERD, epigastric pain or heartburn during the first 7 postoperative years.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Pirosis/etiología , Pirosis/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 77(1): 131-136, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36930967

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Large studies comparing outcomes between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are scarce and involve adult populations. The aim of the study was to compare perioperative, early postoperative, and 1-year postoperative outcomes of adolescents with obesity who underwent LSG or OAGB surgery. METHODS: The medical records of adolescents with obesity who underwent LSG or OAGB at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center from January 2017 to January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on their gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and postoperative quality of life were obtained by a telephone interview. RESULTS: Included were 75 adolescents (median [interquartile range, IQR] age 17.3 [16-18] years) of whom 22 underwent OAGB and 53 underwent LSG. There were no significant preoperative group differences in age, sex, and body mass index score. A low rate of perioperative (5.7% vs 0) and postoperative complication (15.1% vs 10%) with no statistical differences between LSG and OAGB group, respectively, was noted. At 12 months, the percent excessive weight loss + IQR was 42.40% [30.00, 45.00] and 38.00% [33.550, 44.20] in the LSG and OAGB group, respectively ( P = NS). The results of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Gastrointestinal Symptoms scale revealed significantly less food limitation and heartburn after OAGB compared to LSG (food limitation 71.63 vs 53.85 and heartburn 83.654 vs 61.6, P = 0.03 and P = 0.029, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgeries are effective and safe for weight loss in the adolescent population. OAGB was associated with significantly fewer GI symptoms compared to LSG.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Obesidad Infantil , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pirosis/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Obesidad Infantil/cirugía , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Peso , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Surg Innov ; 30(6): 745-757, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36998190

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the most common standard technique worldwidely for Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Another type of fundoplication, laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF), intends to reduce incidence of postoperative complications. A systematic review and meta-analysis are required on short- and long-term outcomes based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between LNF and LTF. METHODS: We searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Knowledge for RCTs comparing LNF and LTF. Outcomes included postoperative reflux recurrence, postoperative heartburn, dysphagia and postoperative chest pain, inability to belch, gas bloating, satisfaction with intervention, postoperative esophagitis, postoperative DeMeester scores, operating time (min), in-hospital complications, postoperative use of proton pump inhibitors, reoperation rate, postoperative lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure (mmHg). We assessed data using risk ratios and weighted mean differences in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Eight eligible RCTs comparing LNF (n = 605) and LTF (n = 607) were identified. There were no significant differences between the LNF and LTF in terms of postoperative reflux recurrence, postoperative heartburn, postoperative chest pain, satisfaction with intervention, reoperation rate in short and long term, in-hospital complications, esophagitis in short term, and gas bloating, postoperative DeMeester scores, postoperative use of proton pump inhibitors, reoperation rate in long term. LTF had lower LOS pressure (mmHg), fewer postoperative dysphagia and inability to belch in short and long term and gas bloating in short term compared to LNF. CONCLUSION: LTF were equally effective at controlling reflux symptoms and improving the quality of life, but with lower rate of complications compared to LNF. We concluded that LTF surgical treatment was superior for over 16 years old patients with typical symptoms of GERD and without upper abdominal surgical history upon high-level evidence of evidence-based medicine.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Esofagitis , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Adolescente , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Fundoplicación/métodos , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/complicaciones , Pirosis/etiología , Pirosis/cirugía , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Esofagitis/complicaciones , Esofagitis/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio , Dolor en el Pecho/complicaciones , Dolor en el Pecho/cirugía
8.
Surg Endosc ; 37(5): 3769-3779, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36689039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) erosion, disruption or displacement clearly requires device removal. However, up to 5.5% of patients without anatomical failure require removal for dysphagia or recurrent GERD symptoms. Studies characterizing these patients or their management are limited. We aimed to characterize these patients, compare their outcomes, and determine the necessity for further reflux surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 777 patients who underwent MSA at our institution between 2013 and 2021. Patients who underwent device removal for persistent dysphagia or recurrent GERD symptoms were included. Demographic, clinical, objective testing, and quality of life data obtained preoperatively, after implantation and following removal were compared between removal for dysphagia and GERD groups. Sub-analyses were performed comparing outcomes with and without an anti-reflux surgery (ARS) at the time of removal. RESULTS: A total of 40 (5.1%) patients underwent device removal, 31 (77.5%) for dysphagia and 9 (22.5%) for GERD. After implantation, dysphagia patients had less heartburn (12.9-vs-77.7%, p = 0.0005) less regurgitation (16.1-vs-55.5%, p = 0.0286), and more pH-normalization (91.7-vs-33.3%, p = 0.0158). Removal without ARS was performed in 5 (55.6%) GERD and 22 (71.0%) dysphagia patients. Removal for dysphagia patients had more complete symptom resolution (63.6-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0159), freedom from PPIs (81.8-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0016) and pH-normalization (77.8-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0455). Patients who underwent removal for dysphagia had comparable symptom resolution (p = 0.6770, freedom from PPI (p = 0.3841) and pH-normalization (p = 0.2534) with or without ARS. Those who refused ARS with removal for GERD had more heartburn (100.0%-vs-25.0%, p = 0.0476), regurgitation (80.0%-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0476) and PPI use (75.0%-vs-0.0%, p = 0.0476). CONCLUSIONS: MSA removal outcomes are dependent on the indication for removal. Removal for dysphagia yields excellent outcomes regardless of anti-reflux surgery. Patients with persistent GERD had worse outcomes on all measures without ARS. We propose a tailored approach to MSA removal-based indication for removal.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Pirosis/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fenómenos Magnéticos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Surg Endosc ; 37(3): 2189-2193, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35737137

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent data describing gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms experienced by patients after bariatric surgery is lacking, and previous studies in sleeve gastrectomy patients have been limited in scope of follow-up time or extent of GI symptoms examined. We sought to characterize the prevalence and time course of patient-reported eating-related symptoms in sleeve gastrectomy patients. METHODS: From July 2020 to July 2021, sleeve gastrectomy patients seen at three Boston area hospitals received electronic surveys and prospectively reported GI symptoms using the BODY-Q eating-related symptoms scale. Descriptive analyses were performed for patient demographics and symptom prevalence. Chi-square tests were used to compare prevalence of eating-related symptoms between follow-up time intervals. RESULTS: 491 sleeve gastrectomy patients completed postoperative surveys with mean follow-up time of 1.9 years. Mean age was 46.6 years, and 81.3% were female. The most reported GI symptoms overall included constipation (56.6%), bloating (54.0%), heartburn when standing (41.5%), and heartburn when lying down (39.9%) while the least commonly reported symptoms were palpitations (16.3%), low blood sugar (15.7%), and emesis (15.1%). At greater than 12 months, the most reported symptoms similarly included bloating (60.3%), constipation (53.2%), and heartburn while standing (46.0%). When comparing prevalence of eating-related symptoms across follow-up time intervals from < 1 to > 12 months, patients reported a significant decrease in constipation, abdominal pain, and nausea over time (p = 0.012, p < .0001, p = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients experience both upper and lower GI symptoms following sleeve gastrectomy, and symptoms, including bloating, constipation, and heartburn may persist through long-term follow-up. These patient-centered measures add value by guiding preoperative counseling, informing postoperative expectations, and providing real-time clinical feedback for bariatric surgery patients.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pirosis/cirugía , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Estreñimiento/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Surg Endosc ; 37(1): 189-199, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35915187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing long-term outcome after laparoscopic (LF) and open fundoplication (OF) in children are lacking. Here we report recurrence rates and time to recurrence, frequency of re-interventions, use of antisecretory drugs, gastrointestinal symptoms, and patient/parental satisfaction a decade after children were randomized to LF or OF. METHODS: Cross-sectional long-term follow-up study of a two-center RCT that included patients during 2003-2009. Patients/parents were interviewed and medical charts reviewed for any events that might be related to the fundoplication. If suspicion of recurrence, further diagnostics were performed. Informed consent and ethical approval were obtained. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT01551134. RESULTS: Eighty-eight children, 56 (64%) boys, were randomized (LF 44, OF 44) at median 4.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.0-8.9] years. 46 (52%) had neurological impairment. Three were lost to follow-up before first scheduled control. Recurrence was significantly more frequent after LF (24/43, 56%) than after OF (13/42, 31%, p = 0.004). Median time to recurrence was 1.0 [IQR 0.3-2.2] and 5.1 [IQR 1.5-9.3] years after LF and OF, respectively. Eight (19%) underwent redo fundoplication after LF and three (7%) after OF (p = 0.094). Seventy patients/parents were interviewed median 11.9 [IQR 9.9-12.8] years postoperatively. Among these, use of anti-secretory drugs was significantly decreased from preoperatively after both LF (94% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and OF (97% vs. 19%, p < 0.001). Regurgitation/vomiting were observed in 6% after LF and 3% after OF (p = 0.609), and heartburn in 14% after LF and 17% after OF (p = 1.000). Overall opinion of the surgical scars was good in both groups (LF: 95%, OF: 86%, p = 0.610). Patient/parental satisfaction with outcome was high, independent of surgical approach (LF: 81%, OF: 88%, p = 0.500). CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate was higher and recurrence occurred earlier after LF than after OF. Patient/parental satisfaction with outcome after both LF and OF was equally high.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pirosis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Vómitos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
11.
Esophagus ; 20(1): 170-177, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36201134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The outcome of anti-reflux surgery in patients with suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux-induced cough is frequently uncertain. The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication for controlling cough in patients with chronic cough without asthma, who have pathologic gastro-oesophageal reflux, and to identify predictors of response. METHODS: From a prospective database of 1598 patients who have undergone laparoscopic fundoplication, 66 (4%) with proven gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and chronic cough without asthma were studied. All patients underwent gastroscopy and 24-h pH monitoring before operation. Heartburn and regurgitation were assessed using a modified DeMeester score. Severity of cough before and after surgery was self-assessed by the patient using a visual analog scale at a minimum of 12 months post-operatively (median 43 mo; range: 14-104 mo). Patients were considered to have responded to fundoplication if they had no cough or the cough had improved by 50% or more after operation. RESULTS: Cough and heartburn/regurgitation were relieved in 61% (40/66) and 90% (44/49) of the patients, respectively. The presence of typical GORD symptoms or oesophagitis, and pH study variables did not predict the response of the cough to fundoplication. CONCLUSION: Refinement in the aetiological diagnosis of chronic cough due to GORD is necessary for improved outcome. Patients diagnosed with GORD-related chronic cough need to be counseled regarding their expectations from anti-reflux surgery.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Tos , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Asma/complicaciones , Asma/cirugía , Enfermedad Crónica , Tos/etiología , Tos/cirugía , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Pirosis/cirugía , Pirosis/complicaciones , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos
12.
Dis Esophagus ; 33(4)2020 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31942976

RESUMEN

Typical reflux symptoms that respond well to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy are key factors predictive of an excellent outcome with antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to evaluate whether poor preoperative heartburn (HB) relief with PPIs was associated with a worse outcome after Nissen fundoplication. Patients with a main symptom of HB and a positive pH-test who had a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between January 2008 and December 2014 were included. Prior to surgery, patients graded how effectively their HB symptoms were relieved by PPIs. Three groups were defined: good response (76-100% relief), partial response (26-75% relief) and poor response (0-25% relief). Outcomes and satisfaction were assessed at a minimum of 1 year after fundoplication. There were 129 patients who met inclusion criteria and 75 agreed to participate. The median follow-up was 48 months. Prior to Nissen fundoplication 13 patients had a good HB response to PPI-therapy, 36 had a partial response and 26 had a poor response. All patients were satisfied with their HB relief after fundoplication (mean satisfaction score: 9.5/10) and there was no difference in satisfaction score or heartburn relief between groups. Heartburn symptoms that respond poorly to PPI therapy are reliably relieved with a Nissen fundoplication in patients with objectively confirmed GERD. Patient satisfaction after Nissen fundoplication was excellent and was similar in patients with poor versus excellent HB relief with preoperative PPI therapy. Therefore, antireflux surgery is an option for patients with HB and confirmed GERD regardless of the degree of relief of HB symptoms provided by PPI medications.


Asunto(s)
Esofagoscopía/métodos , Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Pirosis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Monitorización del pH Esofágico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
13.
Surg Endosc ; 34(4): 1823-1828, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286255

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication is the treatment of choice for medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Surgeons seek to create a competent valve at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) but are careful to construct a 'floppy' fundoplication that is not too tight to minimize side effects. The endoscopic functional luminal-imaging probe (EndoFLIP®) uses impedance planimetry to assess the GEJ intraoperatively. We sought to determine if EndoFLIP variables are associated with symptomatic outcomes following fundoplication. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively maintained data on subjects who underwent primary laparoscopic fundoplication at a single institution between 2014 and 2018. All patients met standard indications for antireflux surgery. Minimum diameter (Dmin), cross-sectional area (CSA), intra-bag pressure, and distensibility index of the GEJ were obtained at 30 mL volumes. GERD Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) surveys were administered pre- and postoperatively. Patients were excluded if they underwent fundoplication without EndoFLIP assessment or if they did not complete a postop GERD-HRQL survey. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine if EndoFLIP measurements were correlated with symptomatic outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The change in Dmin and CSA measures during fundoplication were associated with daily or more frequent heartburn at 6 or more months postop. A decrease in Dmin of 0.15 mm or less (AUC = 0.718, sensitivity: 71%, specificity: 69%) and a decrease in CSA of 1.5 mm2 or less (AUC = 0.728, sensitivity: 71%, specificity: 70%) were associated with severe heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: GEJ opening dynamics attained by EndoFLIP appear to be associated with symptomatic outcomes. When the Dmin and CSA do not decrease by a defined threshold, heartburn is more likely to be severe at 6 or more months postoperatively. This suggests that the fundoplication may not be tight enough to prevent persistent or recurrent GERD.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Femenino , Pirosis/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Surg Endosc ; 34(2): 510-520, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31628621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the extensive literature on laparoscopic antireflux surgery, comparative evidence across different procedures is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess and rank the most efficacious and safe laparoscopic procedures for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: Medline, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and OpenGrey databases were queried for randomized trials comparing two or more laparoscopic antireflux procedures with each other or with medical treatment for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted for each pair of interventions using a random-effects model. Network meta-analysis was employed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of laparoscopic antireflux procedures for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. RESULTS: Forty-four publications reporting 29 randomized trials which included 1892 patients were identified. The network of treatments was sparse with only a closed loop between different types of wraps; 270°, 360°, anterior 180° and anterior 90°; and star network between 360° and other treatments; and between anterior 180° and other treatments. Laparoscopic 270° (odds ratio, OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.64-2.22), anterior 180°, and anterior 90° were equally effective as 360° for control of heartburn, although this finding was supported by low quality of evidence according to GRADE modification for NMA. The odds for dysphagia were lower after 270° (OR 0.38, 95%, CI 0.24-0.60), anterior 90° (moderate quality evidence), and anterior 180° (low-quality evidence) compared to 360°. The odds for gas-bloat were lower after 270° (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27, 0.95) and after anterior 90° compared to 360° (low-quality evidence). Regurgitation, morbidity, and reoperation were similar across treatments, albeit these were associated with very low-quality evidence. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic 270° fundoplication achieves a better outcome than 360° total fundoplication, especially in terms of postoperative dysphagia, although other types of partial fundoplication might be equally effective. REGISTRATION NO: CRD42017074783.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Esofagoplastia , Pirosis/cirugía , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Segunda Cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
N Engl J Med ; 381(16): 1513-1523, 2019 10 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31618539

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heartburn that persists despite proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is a frequent clinical problem with multiple potential causes. Treatments for PPI-refractory heartburn are of unproven efficacy and focus on controlling gastroesophageal reflux with reflux-reducing medication (e.g., baclofen) or antireflux surgery or on dampening visceral hypersensitivity with neuromodulators (e.g., desipramine). METHODS: Patients who were referred to Veterans Affairs (VA) gastroenterology clinics for PPI-refractory heartburn received 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily for 2 weeks, and those with persistent heartburn underwent endoscopy, esophageal biopsy, esophageal manometry, and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. If patients were found to have reflux-related heartburn, we randomly assigned them to receive surgical treatment (laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication), active medical treatment (omeprazole plus baclofen, with desipramine added depending on symptoms), or control medical treatment (omeprazole plus placebo). The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as a decrease of 50% or more in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)-Health Related Quality of Life score (range, 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms) at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 366 patients (mean age, 48.5 years; 280 men) were enrolled. Prerandomization procedures excluded 288 patients: 42 had relief of their heartburn during the 2-week omeprazole trial, 70 did not complete trial procedures, 54 were excluded for other reasons, 23 had non-GERD esophageal disorders, and 99 had functional heartburn (not due to GERD or other histopathologic, motility, or structural abnormality). The remaining 78 patients underwent randomization. The incidence of treatment success with surgery (18 of 27 patients, 67%) was significantly superior to that with active medical treatment (7 of 25 patients, 28%; P = 0.007) or control medical treatment (3 of 26 patients, 12%; P<0.001). The difference in the incidence of treatment success between the active medical group and the control medical group was 16 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -5 to 38; P = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients referred to VA gastroenterology clinics for PPI-refractory heartburn, systematic workup revealed truly PPI-refractory and reflux-related heartburn in a minority of patients. For that highly selected subgroup, surgery was superior to medical treatment. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01265550.).


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Pirosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Baclofeno/uso terapéutico , Desipramina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Pirosis/etiología , Pirosis/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Veteranos
16.
Surg Endosc ; 33(4): 1196-1205, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30171395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although around 30% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are insufficiently treated with medical therapy, only 1% opt for surgical therapy. One of the reasons behind this multifactorial phenomenon is the described adverse effect of long-term dysphagia or gastric bloating syndrome after surgical treatment. Aim of this study was to evaluate the most common side effects associated with anti-reflux surgery, as well as long-term outcomes in a large cohort of highly surgically standardized patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). METHODS: Out of a prospective patients' database including all patients that underwent anti-reflux surgery between 01/2003 and 01/2017 at our institution, 350 consecutive patients after highly standardized LNF were included in this study. A standardized interview was performed by one physician assessing postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, proton pump inhibitor intake (PPI), GERD-Health-Related-Quality-of-Life (GERD-HRQL), Alimentary Satisfaction (AS), and patients' overall satisfaction. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4 years, persistent dysphagia (PD) after LNF was observed in 8 (2%) patients, while postoperative gas-bloat syndrome in 45 (12.7%) cases. Endoscopic dilatation was needed in 7 (2%) patients due to dysphagia, and 19 (5%) patients underwent revision surgery due to recurrence of GERD. The postoperative GERD-HRQL total score was significantly reduced (2 (IQR 0-4.3) vs. 19 (IQR 17-32); p < 0.000) and the median AS was 9/10. Heartburn relief was achieved in 83% of patients. Eighty-three percent of patients were free of PPI intake after follow-up, whereas 13% and 4% of the patients reported daily and irregular PPI use, respectively. CONCLUSION: LNF is a safe and effective surgical procedure with low postoperative morbidity rates and efficient GERD-related symptom relief. PD does not represent a relevant clinical issue when LNF is performed in a surgical standardized way. These results should be the benchmark to which long-term outcomes of new surgical anti-reflux procedures are compared.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Adulto , Femenino , Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirosis/etiología , Pirosis/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 22(2): 177-186, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28681211

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Some patients require one or more reoperative interventions after undergoing primary antireflux surgery (ARS). We compared outcomes after primary and reoperative ARS. METHODS: We queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent ARS from September 23, 2003 to May 28, 2016. Patients were categorized into four groups: A (primary ARS), B (first reoperative ARS), C (second reoperative ARS), or D (≥ third reoperative ARS). Patients completed follow-up foregut symptom surveys and satisfaction questionnaires at regular intervals. RESULTS: In total, 940 patients were studied (A: n = 545, B: n = 302, C: n = 80, D: n = 13). Age, sex, and BMI were comparable across groups. Heartburn was the most common preoperative symptom in A, whereas dysphagia was more common in B-D. Open approach, mean operative time, and mean blood loss increased from A to D (P < 0.05), as did need for Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Vagal injury (2-19-33-54%; P < 0.05), visceral perforation (2-20-36-23%; P < 0.05), postoperative leak (0.2-2-6-8%; P < 0.05 A vs. all), and morbidity (2-10-14-39%; P < 0.05) also increased from A to D. At mean follow-up of 36 months, the proportion of patients who reported no significant symptoms, excellent satisfaction, and likeliness to recommend this surgery to a friend progressively declined with each successive reintervention (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Complications and patient-reported outcomes worsen with each reoperative ARS.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Pirosis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Femenino , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Pirosis/etiología , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recurrencia , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Síntomas , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Surg Endosc ; 31(8): 3078-3084, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27981382

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The LINX® magnetic sphincter augmentation system (MSA) is a surgical technique with short-term evidence demonstrating efficacy in the treatment of medically refractory or chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Currently, the Nissen fundoplication is the gold-standard surgical treatment for GERD. We are the first to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis comparing MSA to the Nissen fundoplication. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) using search terms "Gastroesophageal reflux or heartburn" and "LINX or endoluminal or magnetic" and "fundoplication or Nissen" was completed. All randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparison study and case series with greater than 5 patients were included. Five hundred and forty-seven titles were identified through primary search, and 197 titles or abstracts were screened after removing duplicates. Meta-analysis was performed on postoperative quality of life outcomes, procedural efficacy and patient procedural satisfaction. RESULTS: Three primary studies identified a total of 688 patients, of whom 273 and 415 underwent Nissen fundoplication and MSA, respectively. MSA was statistically superior to LNF in preserving patient's ability to belch (95.2 vs 65.9%, p < 0.00001) and ability to emesis (93.5 vs 49.5%, p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between MSA and LNF in gas/bloating (26.7 vs 53.4%, p = 0.06), postoperative dysphagia (33.9 vs 47.1%, p = 0.43) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) elimination (81.4 vs 81.5%, p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to be an effective treatment for GERD with short-term outcomes comparable to the more technically challenging and time-consuming Nissen fundoplication. Long-term comparative outcome data past 1 year are needed in order to further understand the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Imanes , Trastornos de Deglución/epidemiología , Eructación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirosis/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Klin Khir ; (9): 14-8, 2016.
Artículo en Ucraniano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30265463

RESUMEN

Two procedures of laparoscopic plasty of large hiatal hernias (HH): cruroraphy (group I) and a two­layered plasty, using lightweight partially absorbable net (LPAN) Ultrapro (group II) were compared in prospective randomized investigation. The results of treat* ment were studied in terms from 24 to 27 mo, (24.4 ± 0.72) mo at average. The pure symptomatic anatomical recurrences rate, including those in conjunction with function* al recurrences, were trustworthily less in group II; duration of functional dysphagia (without stricture) did not differ in the groups trustworthily. Тhus, in large HH a two­lay* ered plasty conduction, using LPAN, permits to reduce the anatomical recurrences rate, not enhancing the complications rate, and it may be considered the operation of choice.


Asunto(s)
Esófago/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estómago/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Adulto , Trastornos de Deglución/patología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Pirosis/patología , Pirosis/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/patología , Humanos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estómago/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Intern Med ; 54(13): 1609-12, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26134191

RESUMEN

A 47-year-old man was found to have a 3-cm epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum on an upper gastrointestinal (UGI) barium study. He developed the symptoms of heartburn approximately 12 months later. UGI endoscopy indicated non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) and an epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum. A proton pump inhibitor (PPI) did not relieve the symptoms. An UGI barium study at that time showed that the epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum had enlarged to 7 cm, and esophageal manometry showed findings of achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), thus vigorous achalasia was diagnosed. Resection of the epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum, myotomy, and fundoplication (the Heller-Dor procedure) were successfully performed and no postoperative symptoms were encountered.


Asunto(s)
Divertículo Esofágico/diagnóstico , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Pirosis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Divertículo Esofágico/cirugía , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico , Fundoplicación/métodos , Pirosis/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...