Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 429
Filtrar
1.
Am J Manag Care ; 26(6): e179-e183, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32549067

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a program that eliminated pharmacy co-pays, the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana (BCBSLA) Zero Dollar Co-pay (ZDC) program, decreased health care spending. Previous studies have found that value-based insurance designs like the ZDC program have little or no impact on total health care spending. ZDC included an expansive set of medications related to 4 chronic diseases rather than a limited set of medications for 1 or 2 chronic diseases. Additionally, ZDC focused on the most at-risk patients. STUDY DESIGN: ZDC began in 2014 and enrolled patients over time based on (1) when a patient answered a call from a nurse care manager and (2) when a patient or their employer changed the benefit structure to meet the program criteria. During 2015 and 2016, 265 patients with at least 1 chronic condition (asthma, diabetes, hypertension, mental illness) enrolled in ZDC. METHODS: Observational study using within-patient variation and variation in patient enrollment month to identify the impact of the ZDC program on health spending measures. We used 100% BCBSLA claims data from January 2015 to June 2018. Monthly level event studies were used to test for differential spending patterns prior to ZDC enrollment. RESULTS: We found that total spending decreased by $205.9 (P = .049) per member per month, or approximately 18%. We saw a decrease in medical spending ($195.0; P = .023) but did not detect a change in pharmacy spending ($7.59; P = .752). We found no evidence of changes in spending patterns prior to ZDC enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: The ZDC program provides evidence that value-based insurance designs that incorporate a comprehensive set of medications and focus on populations with chronic disease can reduce spending.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/estadística & datos numéricos , Deducibles y Coseguros/economía , Deducibles y Coseguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Seguro de Salud Basado en Valor/organización & administración , Seguro de Salud Basado en Valor/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Crónica/economía , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Louisiana , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
2.
N Engl J Med ; 381(3): 252-263, 2019 07 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Population-based global payment gives health care providers a spending target for the care of a defined group of patients. We examined changes in spending, utilization, and quality through 8 years of the Alternative Quality Contract (AQC) of Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) of Massachusetts, a population-based payment model that includes financial rewards and penalties (two-sided risk). METHODS: Using a difference-in-differences method to analyze data from 2006 through 2016, we compared spending among enrollees whose physician organizations entered the AQC starting in 2009 with spending among privately insured enrollees in control states. We examined quantities of sentinel services using an analogous approach. We then compared process and outcome quality measures with averages in New England and the United States. RESULTS: During the 8-year post-intervention period from 2009 to 2016, the increase in the average annual medical spending on claims for the enrollees in organizations that entered the AQC in 2009 was $461 lower per enrollee than spending in the control states (P<0.001), an 11.7% relative savings on claims. Savings on claims were driven in the early years by lower prices and in the later years by lower utilization of services, including use of laboratory testing, certain imaging tests, and emergency department visits. Most quality measures of processes and outcomes improved more in the AQC cohorts than they did in New England and the nation in unadjusted analyses. Savings were generally larger among subpopulations that were enrolled longer. Enrollees of organizations that entered the AQC in 2010, 2011, and 2012 had medical claims savings of 11.9%, 6.9%, and 2.3%, respectively, by 2016. The savings for the 2012 cohort were statistically less precise than those for the other cohorts. In the later years of the initial AQC cohorts and across the years of the later-entry cohorts, the savings on claims exceeded incentive payments, which included quality bonuses and providers' share of the savings below spending targets. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 8 years after its introduction, the BCBS population-based payment model was associated with slower growth in medical spending on claims, resulting in savings that over time began to exceed incentive payments. Unadjusted measures of quality under this model were higher than or similar to average regional and national quality measures. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).


Asunto(s)
Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Massachusetts , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estados Unidos
4.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 24(4): 373-378, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29578853

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate drug use, increasing complexity of drug regimens, continued pressure to control costs, and focus on shared accountability for clinical measures drive the need to leverage the medication expertise of pharmacists in direct patient care. A statewide strategy based on the collaboration of pharmacists and physicians regarding patient care was developed to improve disease state management and medication-related outcomes. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) partnered with Michigan Medicine to develop and implement a statewide provider-payer program called Michigan Pharmacists Transforming Care and Quality (MPTCQ), which integrates pharmacists within physician practices throughout the state of Michigan. As the MPTCQ Coordinating Center, Michigan Medicine established an infrastructure integrating clinical pharmacists into direct patient care within patient-centered medical home (PCMH) practices and provides direction and guidance for quality and process improvement across physician organizations (POs) and their affiliated physician practices. The primary goal of MPTCQ is to improve patient care and outcomes related to Medicare star ratings and HEDIS measures through integration of clinical pharmacists into direct patient care. The short-term goal is to adopt and modify Michigan Medicine's integrated pharmacist practice model at participating POs, with the long-term goal of developing a sustainable model of pharmacist integration at each PO to improve patient care and outcomes. Initially, pharmacists are delivering disease management (diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) and comprehensive medication review services with future plans to expand clinical services. OBSERVATIONS: In 2015, 10 POs participated in year 1 of the program. In collaboration with the MPTCQ Coordinating Center, each PO identified 1 "pharmacist transformation champion" (PTC). The PTC implemented the integrated pharmacist model at 2 or 3 practice sites with at least 2 practicing physicians per site. IMPLICATIONS: MPTCQ is a unique collaboration between a large academic institution, physician organizations, a payer, and a statewide coordinating center to improve patient care and address medication-related challenges by integrating pharmacists into a PCMH network. Pharmacists can actively provide their medication expertise to physicians and patients and optimize quality measure performance. DISCLOSURES: This project was funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Choe and Spahlinger are employees of Michigan Medicine. Tungol Lin, Kobernik, Cohen, Qureshi, Leyden, and Darland are employees of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. At the time of manuscript preparation, Share and Wesolowicz were employees of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Study concept and design were primarily contributed by Choe, along with the other authors. Choe, Tungol Lin, and Kobernik collected data, and data interpretation was performed by Choe, Tungol Lin, Cohen, and Wesolowicz. The manuscript was written primarily by Choe, along with Tungol Lin and assisted by Kobernik, Cohen, Leyden, and Qureshi. The manuscript was revised by Leyden, Spahlinger, Share, and Darland. Material from this manuscript was previously presented as an education session at the 2016 AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; April 19-22, 2016; San Francisco, California.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Atención al Paciente/métodos , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Médicos/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/economía , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/economía , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/organización & administración , Michigan , Atención al Paciente/economía , Farmacias/economía , Farmacias/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración
5.
J Health Econ ; 57: 75-88, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29182936

RESUMEN

In exchange for tax exemptions, Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS) health insurers were expected to provide health insurance to the "bad risks," those for whom coverage was unavailable from other insurers. I present evidence that five years after a BCBS plan converted to for-profit status, the probability of having insurance was 1.4 percentage points higher, a 9% reduction in the uninsured. The increase in coverage does not mask reductions among populations often targeted by public policies. However, there is evidence of increased risk selection which suggests that the bad risks might have been worse off after a conversion.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/economía , Planes de Seguro con Fines de Lucro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Planes de Seguro con Fines de Lucro/economía , Planes de Seguro con Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/organización & administración , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
8.
N C Med J ; 75(3): 195-7, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24830494

RESUMEN

The health care industry is grappling with the challenges of working with and analyzing large, complex, diverse data sets. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina provides several promising examples of how big data can be used to reduce the cost of care, to predict and manage health risks, and to improve clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aplicaciones de la Informática Médica , Computación en Informática Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Informática Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , American Recovery and Reinvestment Act , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/economía , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Costos/estadística & datos numéricos , Recolección de Datos/economía , Recolección de Datos/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/economía , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Computación en Informática Médica/economía , Computación en Informática Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , North Carolina , Obesidad/etiología , Obesidad/prevención & control , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
10.
Med Care ; 51(9): 846-53, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23872904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) has been recognized as a strategy to redesign and improve the delivery of primary health care. Collaboration between Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) and 39 Physician Organizations in Michigan laid the foundation for a state-wide medical home program. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe a unique methodology developed and implemented by BCBSM to designate primary care physician practices as medical homes. METHODS: Since 2009, practices were designated annually as medical homes on the basis of (1) implementation of PCMH-related capabilities, and (2) performance on quality-of-care and health resource utilization measures. An overall score for each practice was calculated. Practices were ranked relative to each other, with the top portion of the continuum representing an achievable level of performance. RESULTS: The number of practices designated as medical homes more than tripled since the program's inception: 302 (1283 physicians) in 2009, 513 (1876 physicians) in 2010, 772 (2547 physicians) in 2011, and 994 (3028 physicians) in 2012. Designated practices reported implementing more than double the PCMH capabilities of nondesignated practices, yet all practices increased their number of implemented capabilities during the 4 years. DISCUSSION: This program represents the largest state-based PCMH program in the United States. Over the 4-year period, 1130 unique practices have received designation, representing 3469 unique physicians. An estimated 1.4 million BCBSM members in Michigan received care from these practices. This program will continue to develop, drawing on changes in the health system landscape, collaboration with the physician community, and knowledge gained from PCMH evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Humanos , Michigan , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía
11.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 31(9): 1993-2001, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22949448

RESUMEN

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan partnered with providers across the state to create an innovative, "fee for value" physician incentive program that would deliver high-quality, efficient care. The Physician Group Incentive Program rewards physician organizations-formal groups of physicians and practices that can accept incentive payments on behalf of their members-based on the number of quality and utilization measures they adopt, such as generic drug dispensing rates, and on their performance on these measures across their patient populations. Physicians also receive payments for implementing a range of patient-centered medical home capabilities, such as patient registries, and they receive higher fees for office visits for incorporating these capabilities into routine practice while also improving performance. Taken together, the incentive dollars, fee increases, and care management payments amount to a potential increase in reimbursement of 40 percent or more from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for practices designated as high-performing patient-centered medical homes. At the same time, we estimate that implementing the patient-centered medical home capabilities was associated with $155 million in lower medical costs in program year 2011 for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan members. We intend to devote a higher percentage of reimbursement over time to communities of caregivers that offer high-value, system-based care, and a lower percentage of reimbursement to individual physicians on a service-specific basis.


Asunto(s)
Práctica de Grupo/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo , Compra Basada en Calidad/organización & administración , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Práctica de Grupo/normas , Michigan , Modelos Organizacionales , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales
15.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ ; 11(2): 115-32, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21562732

RESUMEN

We examine how the market power of physician groups affects the form of their contracts with health insurers. We develop a simple model of physician contracting based on 'behavioral economics' and test it with data from two sources: a survey of physician group practices in Minnesota; and the physician component of the Community Tracking Survey. In both data sets we find that increases in groups' market power are associated with proportionately more fee-for-service revenue and less revenue from capitation.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/economía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Práctica de Grupo/economía , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/economía , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Capitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Contratos/economía , Contratos/normas , Competencia Económica , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica de Grupo/organización & administración , Práctica de Grupo/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Minnesota , Modelos Económicos , Análisis de Regresión
18.
J Bus Contin Emer Plan ; 4(4): 360-7, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21177222

RESUMEN

The popular axiom, 'what gets measured gets done', is often applied in the quality management and continuous improvement disciplines. This truism is also useful to business continuity practitioners as they continually strive to prove the value of their organisation's investment in a business continuity management (BCM) programme. BCM practitioners must also remain relevant to their organisations as executives focus on the bottom line and maintaining stakeholder confidence. It seems that executives always find a way, whether in a hallway or elevator, to ask BCM professionals about the company's level of readiness. When asked, they must be ready with an informed response. The establishment of a process to measure business continuity programme performance and organisational readiness has emerged as a key component of US Department of Homeland Security 'Voluntary Private Sector Preparedness (PS-Prep) Program' standards where the overarching goal is to improve private sector preparedness for disasters and emergencies. The purpose of this paper is two-fold: to introduce continuity professionals to best practices that should be considered when developing a BCM metrics programme as well as providing a case study of how a large health insurance company researched, developed and implemented a process to measure BCM programme performance and company readiness.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres , Sector Privado/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Gestión de Riesgos/organización & administración , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Florida , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo
19.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 29(11): 2002-8, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21041739

RESUMEN

A large value-based insurance design program offered by Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina eliminated generic medication copayments and reduced copayments for brand-name medications. Our study showed that the program improved adherence to medications for diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and congestive heart failure. We found that adherence improved for enrollees, ranging from a gain of 3.8 percentage points for patients with diabetes to 1.5 percentage points for those taking calcium-channel blockers, when compared to others whose employers did not offer a similar program. An examination of longer-term adherence and trends in health care spending is still needed to provide a compelling evidence base for value-based insurance design.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/organización & administración , Seguro de Costos Compartidos/economía , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...