Test Utilization and Value in the Evaluation of Peripheral Neuropathies.

Peripheral neuropathies can be classified as typical or atypical. Patients with atypical neuropathy have one or more of the following features: acute/subacute onset, non-length dependence, motor predominance, or asymmetry. This classification is important because it informs the appropriate diagnostic evaluation of this highly prevalent condition. The evaluation of a typical peripheral neuropathy, also known as distal symmetric polyneuropathy, requires a thorough history, neurologic examination, and focused laboratory testing. Electrodiagnostic testing and MRI account for the majority of costs but rarely lead to changes in diagnosis or management. These costs are increasingly being passed on to patients, especially those with high-deductible health plans. In contrast, patients with atypical neuropathy require more extensive testing, including electrodiagnostic tests. These tests are much more likely to lead to the use of disease-modifying therapies in these patients compared to in those with typical peripheral neuropathy. This article describes two cases to illustrate the appropriate diagnostic workup of those with typical or atypical neuropathy.

Societal costs and burden of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy.

Background: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN) is a rare life-threatening disease that imposes considerable mortality and morbidity associated with increased costs, high social support and productivity losses. This study aims to estimate the societal costs and burden of ATTRv-PN.Methods: A cost-of-illness (COI) and burden of disease model were specified from a societal perspective, using a prevalence-based approach. Direct and indirect costs were included. Healthcare resource use was retrieved from public databases, previous Portuguese studies and the literature. The burden of disease was expressed in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), as defined by the World Health Organisation.Results: In 2016, the total annual COI of ATTRv-PN in Portugal was 52,502,796€ and the mean cost per patient was 28,152€ (79% direct; 21% indirect costs). Treatments accounted for 52% of total costs, while 0.18% were devoted to disease prevention. A total of 2056 DALYs were lost, 26% due to disability and 74% due to death.Conclusions: Annual costs and burden of ATTRv-PN were considerable but within the range of other rare diseases. Policies and public interventions to prevent and reduce the burden of disease should be prioritised, since patients experience excess morbidity, mortality and total costs will likely increase in the future.

Home versus hospital immunoglobulin treatment for autoimmune neuropathies: A cost minimization analysis.

Background: Prior clinical trials have suggested that home-based Ig treatment in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and its variant Lewis-Sumner syndrome (LSS) is safe and effective and is less costly than hospital-administered intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Methods: A French prospective, dual-center, cost minimization analysis was carried out to evaluate IVIg administration (5% concentrated) at home versus in hospital with regard to costs, patients' autonomy, and patients' quality of life. The primary endpoint was the overall cost of treatment, and we adopted the perspective of the payer (French Social Health Insurance). Results: Twenty-four patients aged 52.3 (12.2) years were analyzed: nine patients with MMN, eight with CIDP, and seven with LSS. IVIg (g/kg) dosage was 1.51 ± 0.43 in hospital and 1.52 ± 0.4 at home. Nine-month total costs per patient extrapolated to 1 year of treatment were €48,189 ± 26,105 versus €91,798 ± 51,125 in the home and hospital groups, respectively (p < .0001). The most frequently reported factors for choosing home treatment were the good tolerance and absence of side effects of IVIg administration, as well as a good understanding of the advantages and drawbacks of home treatment (75% of respondents). The mRankin scores before and after switch to home treatment were 1.61 ± 0.72 and 1.36 ± 0.76, respectively (p = .027). Discussion: The switch from hospital-based to home-based IVIg treatment for patients with immune neuropathy represents potentially significant savings in the management of the disease.

Target-enrichment sequencing and copy number evaluation in inherited polyneuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficiency of target-enrichment next-generation sequencing (NGS) with copy number assessment in inherited neuropathy diagnosis. METHODS: A 197 polyneuropathy gene panel was designed to assess for mutations in 93 patients with inherited or idiopathic neuropathy without known genetic cause. We applied our novel copy number variation algorithm on NGS data, and validated the identified copy number mutations using CytoScan (Affymetrix). Cost and efficacy of this targeted NGS approach was compared to earlier evaluations. RESULTS: Average coverage depth was ∼760× (median = 600, 99.4% > 100×). Among 93 patients, 18 mutations were identified in 17 cases (18%), including 3 copy number mutations: 2 PMP22 duplications and 1 MPZ duplication. The 2 patients with PMP22 duplication presented with bulbar and respiratory involvement and had absent extremity nerve conductions, leading to axonal diagnosis. Average onset age of these 17 patients was 25 years (2-61 years), vs 45 years for those without genetic discovery. Among those with onset age less than 40 years, the diagnostic yield of targeted NGS approach is high (27%) and cost savings is significant (∼20%). However, the cost savings for patients with late onset age and without family history is not demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating copy number analysis in target-enrichment NGS approach improved the efficiency of mutation discovery for chronic, inherited, progressive length-dependent polyneuropathy diagnosis. The new technology is facilitating a simplified genetic diagnostic algorithm utilizing targeted NGS, clinical phenotypes, age at onset, and family history to improve diagnosis efficiency. Our findings prompt a need for updating the current practice parameters and payer guidelines.

Health, social and economic consequences of polyneuropathy: a controlled national study evaluating societal effects on patients and their partners.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct and indirect factual costs of polyneuropathy in a national sample of patients and their spouses based on a national register-based cohort study with matched controls. METHODS: Using records from the Danish National Patient Registry (1997-2009) all patients with a diagnosis of polyneuropathy and their partners were identified and compared with randomly chosen controls matched for age, gender, geographic area and civil status. Direct costs included frequencies of primary and secondary sector contacts and procedures, and medication. Indirect costs included the effect on labor supply. Social-transfer payments were included to illustrate the effect on national accounts. All cost data were extracted from national databases. RESULTS: 13,758 unspecified polyneuropathy patients were registered. They were compared with 54,900 matched controls identified from the National Danish Patient Registry. In addition, partners of patients in the case group were matched with partners in the corresponding control group. Almost half of the patients in the patient group had a partner. Patients had significantly higher rates of health-related contacts, medication use and greater socioeconomic costs than controls. They had very marginally lower employment rates, and those who were employed generally had lower incomes. The sum of direct net healthcare costs after the injury (general practitioner services, hospital services and medication) and indirect costs (loss of labor market income) was €12,647 for patients and €2,984 for their partners over and above that of controls. Social-transfer payments were all significantly larger in patients than in control subjects. Furthermore, the patients already exhibited a negative social- and health-related status up to eleven years before the first diagnosis, particularly for those with the highest costs. The health effects were present in all age groups and in both genders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a diagnosis of polyneuropathy experience increased mortality, morbidity and socioeconomic consequences.

[Chickenpox--neurological complications in children]. / Ospa wietrzna--powiklania ze strony osrodkowego ukladu nerwowego.

Chickenpox is one of the most common infectious diseases in children. In most of the cases the disease is mild and no complications of it are being observed. However, in some of the paediatric patients, the disease may have a serious course with different complications. Most of them are not life-threatening, but some of them, like myocarditis, hepatitis or thrombocytopenia, may be dangerous. Neurological complications of Varicella-zoster virus infection, like encephalitis, meningitis, transverse myelitis, cerebellitis, polyneuropathy or an ischemic stroke, are relatively rare. The authors present 5 children with different neurological complications of chickenpox. The neurological complications of chickenpox did not result in permanent sequel but the cost of hospitalization and the exclusion of the child from everyday activity seem to justify the idea of the routine vaccination.

Feasibility and cost efficiency of a diagnostic guideline for chronic polyneuropathy: a prospective implementation study.

BACKGROUND: Extensive investigations are often performed to reveal the cause of chronic polyneuropathy. It is not known whether a restrictive diagnostic guideline improves cost efficiency without loss of diagnostic reliability. METHODS: In a prospective multicentre study, a comparison was made between the workup in patients with chronic polyneuropathy before and after guideline implementation. RESULTS: Three hundred and ten patients were included: 173 before and 137 after guideline implementation. In all patients, the diagnosis would remain the same if the workup was limited to the investigations in the guideline. After guideline implementation, the time to reach a diagnosis decreased by two weeks. There was a reduction of 33% in the number and costs of routine laboratory investigations/patient, and a reduction of 27% in the total number of laboratory tests/patient, despite low guideline adherence. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a diagnostic guideline for chronic polyneuropathy can reduce diagnostic delay and the number and costs of investigations for each patient without loss of diagnostic reliability. Continuous evaluation strategies after guideline implementation may improve guideline adherence and cost efficiency.