Statin-related neurocognitive disorder: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding statin-related neurocognitive disorders have emerged in recent years. However, previous studies have reported inconsistent results. We evaluated the association between statins and neurocognitive disorders using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 2004 to 2022 were obtained from the FAERS database. After deduplication and standardization of drug names, we extracted neurocognitive disorder event (NCDE) cases reported with statins as the suspected drugs. The significant association between statins and NCDE was evaluated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component. RESULTS: In total, 6,959 NCDE cases with statins as the primary suspected drugs were identified. Signals were detected in pravastatin (ROR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.32-1.67), atorvastatin (ROR, 1.39; 95% CI: 1.34-1.44), and simvastatin (ROR, 1.31; 95% CI: 1.25-1.38). Age-stratified analysis showed that (1) in the population aged 65 years and older, signals were detected for atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin, and pitavastatin; and (2) in populations under 65 years of age, signals were detected for atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a significant association between the NCDE and statins, including atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. The intensity of the association increased with age.

With the extensive use of statins worldwide in recent years, some patients have reported that statins lead to cognitive impairment. Researchers have conducted studies on this issue; however, the results have been inconsistent. Some believe that statins have no impact on cognitive function, while others believe they are beneficial, and others believe they have negative effects.To further investigate this issue, we analyzed data from the FDA adverse event reporting system, which collects adverse drug reactions reported by people worldwide, to evaluate the association between statins and cognitive impairment. Our findings suggest that some statins are associated with cognitive impairment. Therefore, when cognitive changes occur in patients taking statins, they should be taken seriously.

Pravastatin for lowering lipids.

BACKGROUND: A detailed summary and meta-analysis of the dose-related effect of pravastatin on lipids is not available. OBJECTIVES: Primary objective To assess the pharmacology of pravastatin by characterizing the dose-related effect and variability of the effect of pravastatin on the surrogate marker: low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol). The effect of pravastatin on morbidity and mortality is not the objective of this systematic review. Secondary objectives • To assess the dose-related effect and variability of effect of pravastatin on the following surrogate markers: total cholesterol; high-density lipoprotein (HDL cholesterol); and triglycerides. • To assess the effect of pravastatin on withdrawals due to adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 2021: CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Bireme LILACS, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of pravastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered lipid data from placebo-controlled trials into Review Manager 5 as continuous data and withdrawal due to adverse effects (WDAEs) data as dichotomous data. We searched for WDAEs information from all trials. We assessed all trials using Cochrane's risk of bias tool under the categories of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases. MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-four RCTs evaluated the dose-related efficacy of pravastatin in 9771 participants. The participants were of any age, with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, and pravastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over the doses of 5 mg to 160 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of pravastatin on blood HDL cholesterol. Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%. The certainty of evidence for these effects was judged to be moderate to high. For every two-fold dose increase there was a 3.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 4.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol. This represented a dose-response slope that was less than the other studied statins: atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, pitavastatin and cerivastatin. From other systematic reviews we conducted on statins for its effect to reduce LDL cholesterol, pravastatin is similar to fluvastatin, but has a decreased effect compared to atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin and cerivastatin. The effect of pravastatin compared to placebo on WADES has a risk ratio (RR) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03). The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with pravastatin because of the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 48.4% of the randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Real-world pharmacogenetics of statin intolerance: effects of SLCO1B1, ABCG2 , and CYP2C9 variants.

OBJECTIVE: The association of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with simvastatin-induced muscle toxicity is well characterized. However, different statins are subject to metabolism and transport also by other proteins exhibiting clinically meaningful genetic variation. Our aim was to investigate associations of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin, those of ABCG2 c.421C>A with intolerance to atorvastatin, fluvastatin, or rosuvastatin, and that of CYP2C9*2 and *3 alleles with intolerance to fluvastatin. METHODS: We studied the associations of these variants with statin intolerance in 2042 patients initiating statin therapy by combining genetic data from samples from the Helsinki Biobank to clinical chemistry and statin purchase data. RESULTS: We confirmed the association of SLCO1B1 c.521C/C genotype with simvastatin intolerance both by using phenotype of switching initial statin to another as a marker of statin intolerance [hazard ratio (HR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.25, P  = 0.025] and statin switching along with creatine kinase measurement (HR 5.44, 95% CI 1.49-19.9, P  = 0.011). No significant association was observed with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. The sample sizes for fluvastatin and pravastatin were relatively small, but SLCO1B1 c.521T>C carriers had an increased risk of pravastatin intolerance defined by statin switching when compared to homozygous reference T/T genotype (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.39, P  = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The current results can inform pharmacogenetic statin prescribing guidelines and show feasibility for the methodology to be used in larger future studies.

Long-term outcomes of statin dose, class, and use intensity on primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality: a national T2DM cohort study.

PURPOSE: To investigate how statins reduce cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in a dose-, class-, and use intensity-dependent manner. METHODS: We used an inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox hazards model, with statin use status as a time-dependent variable, to estimate the effects of statin use on cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: Adjusted hazard ratio [aHR; 95% confidence interval (CI)] for cardiovascular mortality was 0.41 (0.39-0.42). Compared with nonusers, pitavastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, and lovastatin users demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular mortality [aHRs (95% CIs) = 0.11 (0.06, 0.22), 0.35 (0.32, 0.39), 0.36 (0.34, 0.38), 0.39 (0.36, 0.41), 0.42 (0.40, 0.44), 0.46 (0.43, 0.49), and 0.52 (0.48, 0.56), respectively]. In Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 of cDDD-year, our multivariate analysis demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular mortality [aHRs (95% CIs) = 0.63 (0.6, 0.65), 0.44 (0.42, 0.46), 0.33 (0.31, 0.35), and 0.17 (0.16, 0.19), respectively; P for trend < 0.0001]. The optimal statin dose daily was 0.86 DDD, with the lowest aHR for cardiovascular mortality of 0.43. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent statin use can reduce cardiovascular mortality in patients with T2DM; in particular, the higher is the cDDD-year of statin, the lower is the cardiovascular mortality. The optimal statin dose daily was 0.86 DDD. The priority of protective effects on mortality are pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, and lovastatin for the statin users compared with non-statin users.

Effects of Xuezhikang versus Pravastatin on Triglyceride Level in Patients with T2DM and Dyslipidemia: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypertriglyceridemia, is commonly found in patients with diabetes. Xuezhikang, an extract of red yeast rice, is effective in reducing cardiovascular events in Chinese patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD). Xuezhikang has been reported to significantly decrease the level of triglycerides (TG), a potential causal risk factor for myocardial infarction. On the basis of a similar reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, this study will evaluate the effect of xuezhikang on TG levels compared with pravastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and dyslipidemia. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled study to assess the effects of xuezhikang (1.2 g/day) and pravastatin (20 mg/day) on TG and other blood lipid parameters in patients with T2DM and dyslipidemia. A total of 114 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive xuezhikang or pravastatin treatment for 6 weeks. RESULT: The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline in fasting TG levels after 6 weeks. The change from baseline in other fasting and postprandial lipid parameters, and glucose profiles at 1, 2, and 4 h after a nutritious breakfast will also be explored. CONCLUSION: This study will evaluate the effect of a 6-week treatment with xuezhikang compared with pravastatin on fasting and postprandial TG levels and other blood lipid parameters in patients with T2DM and dyslipidemia without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The results will provide more information on optimizing the lipid control of patients with diabetes in the primary prevention of ASCVD.

Long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up of children exposed to pravastatin in utero.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia, especially before term, increases the risk of child neurodevelopmental adverse outcomes. Biological plausibility, preclinical studies, and pilot clinical trials conducted by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers Network support the safety and use of pravastatin to prevent preeclampsia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of antenatal pravastatin treatment in high-risk pregnant individuals on their child's health, growth, and neurodevelopment. STUDY DESIGN: This was an ancillary follow-up cohort study of children born to mothers who participated in the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers Network pilot trials of pravastatin vs placebo in individuals at high risk of preeclampsia (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01717586). After obtaining written informed consent (and assent as appropriate), the parent was instructed to complete the Child Behavior Checklist. To assess the child's motor, cognitive, and developmental outcomes, a certified and blinded study psychologist completed child motor, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral assessments using validated tools. Given the small number of individuals in the studies, the 10- and 20-mg pravastatin groups were combined into 1 group, and the results of the pravastatin group were compared with that of the placebo group. RESULTS: Of 40 children born to mothers in the original trial, 30 (15 exposed in utero to pravastatin and 15 to placebo) were enrolled in this follow-up study. The time of follow-up, which was 4.7 years (interquartile range, 2.5-6.9), was not different between children in the pravastatin group and children in the placebo group. There was no difference in the child's body mass index percentiles per sex and corrected age, the rates of extremes of body mass index percentiles, or the report of any other medical or developmental complications between the 2 groups. No child born in the pravastatin group had any limitation in motor assessment compared with 2 children (13.3%) who walked with difficulty and 4 children (26.7%) who had reduced manual abilities in the placebo group. Moreover, children born to mothers who received pravastatin had a higher general mean conceptual ability score (98.2±16.7 vs 89.7±11.0; P=.13) and a lower frequency (15.4% vs 35.7%; P=.38) of having a score of <85 (ie, 1 standard deviation lower than the mean) compared with those in the placebo group. Finally, there was no difference in the parents' report on the Child Behavior Checklist between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This study reported on the long-term neuromotor, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes among children exposed to pravastatin in utero during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Although the data were limited by the original trial's sample size, no identifiable long-term neurodevelopmental safety signal was evident with the use of pravastatin during pregnancy. This favorable neonatal risk-benefit analysis justifies continued research using pravastatin in clinical trials.

Differences in the diabetogenic effect of statins in patients with prediabetes. The PRELIPID study / Diferencias en cuanto al efecto diabetógeno de las estatinas en pacientes con prediabetes. Estudio Prelipid

Introduction:Statins are used with the understanding that a slightly increased risk of diabetes is outweighed by their cardiovascular benefits. However, it may be necessary to reconsider whether statin therapy really increase this risk mainly in the population with prediabetes.Methods:A multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted to assess the relationship between statin therapy and glucose metabolism in 407 patients aged 63.1 years (11SD) diagnosed with dyslipidemia and prediabetes treated in specialized lipid clinics in Spain.Results:Significant differences were found in HbA1c values among treatment groups (p=0.015). Patients treated with pitavastatin (1–4mg/day) showed the lowest HbA1c levels, with significant differences compared to patients treated with atorvastatin 40–80mg/day (p=0.016) and simvastatin 10–40mg/day (p=0.036). By contrast, patients treated with atorvastatin 40–80mg/day showed the highest HbA1c levels compared to those receiving atorvastatin 10–20mg/day (p=0.003), pitavastatin 1–4mg/day (p=0.016), pravastatin 20–40mg/day (p=0.027), rosuvastatin 5–10mg/day (p=0.043), and no statin treatment (p=0.004). Patients treated with simvastatin 10–40mg/day also had higher values than those treated with atorvastatin 10–20mg/day (p=0.016) and pitavastatin 1–4mg/day (p=0.036) or with no statin treatment (p=0.018).Conclusions:This study suggests that there are differences in the diabetogenic effect of statins. Simvastatin and high doses of atorvastatin may be associated with greater impairment in glucose metabolism than pitavastatin and other statins with less lipid-lowering potency such as pravastatin. (AU)

Introducción:Las estatinas son utilizadas de acuerdo con el entendimiento de que el pequeño riesgo de incremento de diabetes se ve compensado por sus beneficios cardiovasculares. Sin embargo, puede resultar necesario reconsiderar si la terapia con estatinas incrementa realmente el riesgo, principalmente en la población con prediabetes.Métodos:Se realizó un estudio multicéntrico, transversal y observacional para evaluar la relación entre la terapia con estatinas y el metabolismo de la glucosa en 407 pacientes de 63,1 años (11 DE) diagnosticados de dislipidemia y prediabetes tratados en clínicas especializadas en lípidos en España.Resultados:Se encontraron diferencias significativas en los valores de HbA1c entre los grupos de tratamiento (p=0,015). Los pacientes tratados con pitavastatina (1-4mg/día) reflejaron los menores niveles de HbA1c, con diferencias significativas en comparación con los pacientes tratados con atorvastatina 40-80mg/día (p=0,016) y simvastatina 10-40mg/día (p=0,036). Por contra, los pacientes tratados con atorvastatina 40-80mg/día reflejaron los mayores niveles de HbA1c en comparación con los pacientes que recibieron atorvastatina 10-20mg/día (p=0,003), pitavastatina 1-4mg/día (p=0,016), pravastatina 20-40mg/día (p=0,027), rosuvastatina 5-10mg/día (p=0,043) y los que no recibieron estatinas (p=0,004). Los pacientes tratados con simvastatina 10-40mg/día tuvieron también valores más elevados que aquellos pacientes tratados con atorvastatina 10-20mg/día (p=0,016) y pitavastatina 1-4mg/día (p=0,036) que no recibieron estatinas (p=0,018).Conclusiones:El presente estudio sugiere que existen diferencias en cuanto al efecto diabetógeno de las estatinas. Simvastatina y las altas dosis de atorvastatina pueden guardar relación con un mayor deterioro del metabolismo de la glucosa que pitavastatina y demás estatinas con menor potencia de reducción de lípidos, tales como pravastatina. (AU)

Comparison of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and persistent physical disability in older adults.

PURPOSE: Recent epidemiological evidence has suggested that use of lipid-lowering medications, particularly statins, was associated with reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and persistent physical disability in healthy older adults. However, the comparative efficacy of different statins in this group remains unclear. This study aimed to compare different forms of statins in their associations with CVD and physical disability in healthy older adults. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included data from 5981 participants aged ≥ 70 years (≥ 65 if US minorities; median age:74.0) followed for a median of 4.7 years, who had no prior CVD events or physical disability and reported using a statin at baseline. The incidence of the composite and components of major adverse cardiovascular events and persistent physical disability were compared across different statins according to their type, potency, and lipophilicity using multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: Atorvastatin was the most used statin type at baseline (37.9%), followed by simvastatin (29.6%), rosuvastatin (25.5%), and other statins (7.0%, predominantly pravastatin). In comparisons of specific statins according to type and lipophilicity (lipophilic vs. hydrophilic statin), observed differences in all outcomes were small and not statistically significant (all p values > 0.05). High-potency statin use (atorvastatin and rosuvastatin) was marginally associated with lower risk of fatal CVD events compared with low-/moderate-potency statin use (hazard ratio: 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.35, 1.00). CONCLUSION: There were minimal differences in CVD outcomes and no significant difference in persistent physical disability between various forms of statins in healthy older adults. Future investigations are needed to confirm our results.

Assessment of the Effect of Filgotinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Adult Participants.

Filgotinib, an oral Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor, is approved in Europe and Japan for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality; thus, it is important to understand potential drug-drug interactions of filgotinib with lipid-lowering agents. This open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin with and without filgotinib coadministration. Healthy participants (N = 27) received single doses of atorvastatin (40 mg) and of a pravastatin (40 mg)/rosuvastatin (10 mg) cocktail-alone or with filgotinib (200 mg once daily for 11 days)-on 2 different occasions with washout in between. Serial pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected, and safety was assessed. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric least-squares mean (GLSM) ratio of the test treatment (statin coadministration with filgotinib) vs statin alone, with prespecified lack-of-interaction bounds of 0.70 to 1.43. Coadministration of filgotinib did not affect atorvastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ; [GLSM ratios (90% CI): 0.91 (0.84-0.99)]), but maximum concentration [Cmax ] was slightly lower [0.82 (0.69-0.99)]. The exposure of 2-hydroxy-atorvastatin was unaffected (GLSM ratios [90% CI], 0.98 [0.81-1.19] for Cmax ; 1.11 [1.02-1.22] for AUCinf ). Pravastatin AUCinf was also unaffected (GLSM ratios, 1.22 [1.05-1.41], but Cmax was slightly higher 1.25 [1.01-1.54]). Rosuvastatin exposure was moderately higher with filgotinib coadministration-GLSM ratios (90% CI), 1.68 (1.43-1.97) for Cmax ; 1.42 (1.30-1.57) for AUCinf -but this was not considered clinically relevant. These results indicate that filgotinib has no clinically meaningful effect on exposure of atorvastatin, pravastatin, or rosuvastatin.

Pravastatin concentrations in maternal serum, umbilical cord serum, breast milk and neonatal serum during pregnancy and lactation: A case study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Statins are associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in patients with preeclamptic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and intrauterine foetal death. Several studies showed that statins are not teratogenic. However, data characterizing placental transfer and excretion of pravastatin into breast milk are limited. CASE SUMMARY: We experienced two patients diagnosed with APS received 10 mg of pravastatin from the first trimester until delivery to prevent pre-eclampsia. Pravastatin concentrations in maternal serum, infant serum and cord blood were evaluated. The estimated maternal-foetal transfer ratios of pravastatin in the two patients were 25.5% and 23.8% respectively. Pravastatin was eliminated from neonatal serum within 2 days. Both infants developed normally with no drug-related adverse effects. Pravastatin was not detected in either patient's breast milk at 3 days after the last dose. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The infants delivered from the mothers who were treated with pravastatin during pregnancy had no apparent adverse effects.

Differences in the diabetogenic effect of statins in patients with prediabetes. The PRELIPID study.

INTRODUCTION: Statins are used with the understanding that a slightly increased risk of diabetes is outweighed by their cardiovascular benefits. However, it may be necessary to reconsider whether statin therapy really increase this risk mainly in the population with prediabetes. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted to assess the relationship between statin therapy and glucose metabolism in 407 patients aged 63.1 years (11SD) diagnosed with dyslipidemia and prediabetes treated in specialized lipid clinics in Spain. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in HbA1c values among treatment groups (p=0.015). Patients treated with pitavastatin (1-4mg/day) showed the lowest HbA1c levels, with significant differences compared to patients treated with atorvastatin 40-80mg/day (p=0.016) and simvastatin 10-40mg/day (p=0.036). By contrast, patients treated with atorvastatin 40-80mg/day showed the highest HbA1c levels compared to those receiving atorvastatin 10-20mg/day (p=0.003), pitavastatin 1-4mg/day (p=0.016), pravastatin 20-40mg/day (p=0.027), rosuvastatin 5-10mg/day (p=0.043), and no statin treatment (p=0.004). Patients treated with simvastatin 10-40mg/day also had higher values than those treated with atorvastatin 10-20mg/day (p=0.016) and pitavastatin 1-4mg/day (p=0.036) or with no statin treatment (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there are differences in the diabetogenic effect of statins. Simvastatin and high doses of atorvastatin may be associated with greater impairment in glucose metabolism than pitavastatin and other statins with less lipid-lowering potency such as pravastatin.

Pravastatin Versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk of Term Preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Effective screening for term preeclampsia is provided by a combination of maternal factors with measurements of mean arterial pressure, serum placental growth factor, and serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 at 35 to 37 weeks of gestation, with a detection rate of ≈75% at a screen-positive rate of 10%. However, there is no known intervention to reduce the incidence of the disease. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 1120 women with singleton pregnancies at high risk of term preeclampsia to receive pravastatin at a dose of 20 mg/d or placebo from 35 to 37 weeks of gestation until delivery or 41 weeks. The primary outcome was delivery with preeclampsia at any time after randomization. The analysis was performed according to intention to treat. RESULTS: A total of 29 women withdrew consent during the trial. Preeclampsia occurred in 14.6% (80 of 548) of participants in the pravastatin group and in 13.6% (74 of 543) in the placebo group. Allowing for the effect of risk at the time of screening and participating center, the mixed-effects Cox regression showed no evidence of an effect of pravastatin (hazard ratio for statin/placebo, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.78-1.49]; P=0.65). There was no evidence of interaction between the effect of pravastatin, estimated risk of preeclampsia, pregnancy history, adherence, and aspirin treatment. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of any secondary outcomes, including gestational hypertension, stillbirth, abruption, delivery of small for gestational age neonates, neonatal death, or neonatal morbidity. There was no significant between-group difference in the treatment effects on serum placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 concentrations 1 and 3 weeks after randomization. Adherence was good, with reported intake of ≥80% of the required number of tablets in 89% of participants. There were no significant between-group differences in neonatal adverse outcomes or other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin in women at high risk of term preeclampsia did not reduce the incidence of delivery with preeclampsia. Registration: URL: https://www.isrctn.com; Unique identifier ISRCTN16123934.

Pravastatin-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Pancreatitis is inflammation of pancreas associated most commonly with chronic alcoholism and gallstones. Other less common causes of pancreatitis are hyperlipidemia, infections, surgery, trauma, post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and drugs. Drugs are now increasingly recognized as a cause of pancreatitis, and high suspicion and exclusion of other most common causes is required before considering drug-induced pancreatitis. There are few case reports of acute pancreatitis in the literature after statin use, but out of these, only 3 are after starting pravastatin. We are reporting a case of 49-year-old male who presented with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. His laboratory findings were significant for lipase more than 10 000 on admission, and computed tomography scan of abdomen was showing peripancreatic fat stranding and inflammation. After exclusion of most common causes of pancreatitis, pravastatin was found probable culprit for his symptoms, which he started taking 2 weeks ago. We also reviewed the literature on statins-induced acute pancreatitis. With increased uses of statins, physician need to be vigilant to suspect statins as a culprit in cases of pancreatitis with unknown etiology. Prompt discontinuation of statins is required in these cases.

The effect of statins on semen parameters in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Statins constitute the mainstay of treatment in patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, their effect on semen parameters is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the best available evidence regarding the effect of statins on ejaculate volume and sperm concentration, motility, morphology, or vitality. MATERIALS/METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL and Scopus databases up to January 10, 2021. Either randomized-controlled trials or prospective cohorts, conducted in males with hypercholesterolemia, were included. RESULTS: Four studies, published between 1992 and 2014, were eligible. The number of participants ranged from 8 to 120 (n = 161). Study duration ranged from 14 to 48 weeks. The type and dose of statin used were pravastatin 20-80 mg/day and simvastatin 20-40 mg/day. With regard to ejaculate volume (n = 3) and sperm concentration (n = 4), no effect was shown with either pravastatin or simvastatin. Regarding sperm motility, either an increase (n = 2; pravastatin, simvastatin), decrease (n = 1; pravastatin), or no effect (n = 1; pravastatin, simvastatin) was found. With respect to sperm morphology, either a decrease (n = 2; pravastatin, simvastatin) or no effect (n = 2; pravastatin, simvastatin) was shown. Concerning sperm vitality, a single study showed a decrease with simvastatin. Because of the high heterogeneity of the populations studied and the limited number of studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review on the effect of statins on semen parameters. As there is no evidence for such a detrimental effect, no specific approach has to be suggested regarding the preservation of reproductive function in men with hypercholesterolemia.

Evaluation of serious bleeding signals during concomitant use of clopidogrel and hypnotic drugs.

BACKGROUND: In a previous drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening study intended to generate hypotheses, clopidogrel + either eszopiclone or zolpidem (vs. clopidogrel alone) were associated with serious bleeding. OBJECTIVES: To confirm or refute these DDI signals and examine associations with other hypnotics in an independent population of United States Medicaid beneficiaries METHODS: We employed a bi-directional self-controlled case series design in eligible individuals concomitantly exposed to one of 12 hypnotics (precipitants, exposures of interest) plus either clopidogrel (the object drug) or pravastatin (the negative control object drug). The outcome was hospital presentation with serious bleeding. Using conditional Poisson regression, we calculated confounder-adjusted rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals for serious bleeding during clopidogrel + precipitant use (vs. clopidogrel alone). To distinguish a DDI from a precipitant's inherent effect on bleeding, we divided effect measures by the adjusted RR for the corresponding pravastatin + precipitant pair to obtain ratios of RR (RRRs). RESULTS: Among 23,194 users of clopidogrel and 3824 of pravastatin who experienced serious bleeding during an active prescription for one of these agents, confounder-adjusted RRRs for serious bleeding were 6.63 (0.39-113.01) and 0.77 (0.53-1.11) with eszopiclone and zolpidem, respectively, whereas confounder-adjusted RRRs for other hypnotics ranged from 0.18 (0.04-0.85) for triazolam to 1.79 (0.16-20.44) for zaleplon. Statistical imprecision therefore precluded us from confirming or refuting these prior signals with eszopiclone and zolpidem. CONCLUSIONS: While we could not confirm or refute previously identified DDI signals, numerically elevated RRRs for serious bleeding with several clopidogrel + hypnotic pairs warrant further examination.

Pravastatin plus L-arginine prevents adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with uteroplacental vascular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Uteroplacental vascular dysfunction, characterized by diminished uterine artery (UtA) blood flow in the second trimester is a clinically useful predictor of the further development of preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction and stillbirth. Efforts to develop effective treatments to protect pregnancies with abnormal UtA Dopplers would be of significant clinical benefit for mothers and their fetuses. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot non randomized control study was to use pravastatin +L-arginine to improve uteroplacental haemodynamics and prevent adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with abnormal Dopplers and high risk for developing adverse pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This study was performed between 2015 and 2018. All women received primary care at OB/GYN Polyclinic Jurisic and Narodni Front University Hospital, University of Belgrade Medical School, Serbia. Approval for investigational drug use was obtained and all women gave informed consent. 10 pregnant women with a poor obstetric history that developed uteroplacental dysfunction (UtA pulsatility index (PI) above the 95th percentile and notching) at 20.5 weeks IQR [17.7-22] gave consent to be treated daily with pravastatin (40 mg) and L-arginine (1.5 g) to improve placental blood flow and pregnancy outcomes. 5 women remained untreated after diagnosis at 21 weeks [20-22] (control group). Due to presence of risk factors for pregnancy complications, close maternal and fetal monitoring was undertaken in all patients. Doppler examinations were performed to monitor changes in placental vascular resistance and fetal well-being and growth. RESULTS: PRAV+L-arginine improved uteroplacental haemodynamics, increased fetal growth and prevented early onset preeclampsia leading to delivery close to term (delivery date: median 38 weeks, IQR[36.5-39]) and appropriate weight for gestational age compared to controls, in which placental blood flow did not improve and 2 women developed severe early onset preeclampsia. Neonates from the control group were born preterm (25 weeks IQR[23.5-25]), growth restricted and spent several months at NICU. Two neonates died due to prematurity-associated complications. PRAV+L-arginine treatment prolonged pregnancies for 4.1 months, compared to 26 days in the untreated group, preventing neonatal complications associated with prematurity. The infants are now 1-3 years old and show normal growth and development. CONCLUSION: This study describes the successful management with pravastatin+L-arginine of 10 pregnant patients with uteroplacental vascular dysfunction and high risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. A larger study is being organized to confirm these observations.

Efficacy and safety profile of statins in patients with cancer: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

PURPOSE: A growing body of preclinical and observational research suggests that statins have potential as a therapeutic strategy in patients with cancer. This systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with solid tumours aimed to determine the efficacy of statin therapy on mortality outcomes, their safety profile and the risk of bias of included studies. METHODS: Full-text articles comparing statin therapy versus control in solid tumours and reporting mortality outcomes were identified from Medline and Embase from conception to February 2020. A systematic review with qualitative (primarily) and quantitative synthesis was conducted. This systematic review was prospectively registered (Prospero registration CRD42018116364). RESULTS: Eleven trials of 2165 patients were included. Primary tumour sites investigated included lung, colorectal, gastro-oesophageal, pancreatic and liver. Most trials recruited patients with advanced malignancy and used sub-maximal statin doses for relatively short durations. Aside from one trial which demonstrated benefit with allocation to pravastatin 40 mg in hepatocellular carcinoma, the remaining ten trials did not demonstrate efficacy with statins. The pooled hazard ratio for all-cause mortality with allocation to pravastatin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in two trials was 0.69 (95% confidence interval CI 0.30-1.61). Study estimates were imprecise. There were no clinically important differences in statin-related adverse events between groups. Overall, included trials were deemed low risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The trial evidence is not sufficiently robust to confirm or refute the efficacy and safety of statins in patients with solid malignant tumours. Study and patient characteristics may explain this uncertainty. The potential role of high-dose statins in adjuvant settings deserves further research.

Resveratrol for protection against statin toxicity in C2C12 and H9c2 cells.

Statins are among the most commonly prescribed drugs for the treatment of high blood cholesterol. Myotoxicity of statins in certain individuals is often a severe side effect leading to withdrawal. Using C2C12 and H9c2 cells, both exhibiting characteristics of skeletal muscle cells, we addressed whether resveratrol (RSV) can prevent statin toxicity. Statins decreased cell viability in a dose and time-dependent manner. Among the five statins tested, atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin, simvastatin is the most toxic one. Simvastatin at 10 µM caused about 65% loss of metabolic activity as measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays in C2C12 cells or H9c2 cells. Inhibition of metabolic activity correlates with an increase in caspase activity. RSV was found to protect H9c2 cells from simvastatin-induced activation of caspase-3/7. However, such protection was not found in C2C12 cells. This cell type-dependent effect of RSV adds to the complexity in muscle cell toxicity of statins.