A history of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: perspective from Houston.

As late as the early 1950s, ligation, cellophane wrapping, endoluminal wiring, endoaneurysmorrhaphy, and other techniques were well-accepted treatments for aneurysm. Techniques aimed at repair of syphilitic and saccular aneurysms of the proximal aorta were largely unsuitable for the larger, fusiform atherosclerotic aneurysms of the thoracoabdominal aorta. The earliest replacements of the thoracoabdominal aorta relied on the use of donor homografts. Repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) necessitated exposing the thoracic aorta above the diaphragm and the abdominal aorta below the diaphragm. Furthermore, these repairs were complicated by incorporating the branching visceral arteries, as well as the risk of life-threatening distal ischemia during repair. Although many of the early centers for aortic surgery were able to quickly develop aortic banks to prepare and store homografts, in time, it became clear that homografts were not ideal for aortic replacement. The ideal aortic replacement would be nontoxic, hypoallergenic, durable, elastic, pliable, and readily available in multiple sizes and shapes. Although Vinyon-N and other materials were explored as synthetic aortic substitutes, ultimately Dacron (Dacron, Kennesaw, GA, USA) was determined to be the most suitable material for aortic graft replacement. The success of Dacron ushered in extra-anatomic approach to TAAA repair, which remained popular for 2 decades. In time, the graft inclusion technique (which followed an anatomical approach) was adopted, which facilitated shorter repair times and improved outcomes for patients. rotective adjuncts-such as left heart bypass, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and cold renal perfusion-were incorporated into surgical repair; the historical context of these adjuncts is explored in depth. The success of TAAA repair depends on the contributions of many individuals. The history of TAAA repair continues to evolve and remains indebted to the pioneering heroes, without whom, successful repair would not be possible.

Dominique Anel, John Hunter, and the Eponymous Hunterian Ligation of Aneurysms: Conception to Current Practice.

The contributions of both Dominique Anel and John Hunter in the development of the eponymous Hunterian ligation of aneurysms are presented. John Hunter, the "father of scientific surgery" lent his name to the eponymous practice of applying ligatures to aneurysmal dilatation of arteries. However, evidence suggests that the operation might antedate him by decades. Dominique Anel was a surgeon in the time of Louis XIV who, after his initial apprenticeships in Toulouse and Montpellier, subsequently served in the French navy. He famously described the lacrimal syringe that bears his name but was also interested in diseases of the bones and arteries. Anel described his technique of ligating an aneurysm of the brachial artery in the winter of 1709-1710 in Turin. His description of ligating just the upper end of the aneurysm without touching the sac was described in his collected works in 1714. This technique was exactly the same as that used by Hunter. However, Hunter had based his decision not to excise the sac on his own research. Hunterian ligation was used routinely before endoaneurysmorrhaphy, after which its popularity declined. Hunterian ligation has been superseded by development of surgical clips and endovascular techniques for intracranial aneurysms. However, the technique is still described occasionally in vascular and neurosurgical literature in the context of treating large aneurysms not amenable to traditional treatment modalities.

Endovascular Approach to Cerebral Revascularization: Historical Vignette.

From their origins as cardiovascular research tools, endovascular techniques have evolved to provide a minimally invasive means of diagnosis and therapy for individuals suffering from occlusive artery disease. The techniques were pioneered by William Harvey, whose work set the stage for all subsequent endovascular experiments. These included the bold self-catheterization procedure performed by Werner Forssmann in 1929, which would lead to his dismissal by his superiors, only to regain respect within the medical community in 1956 on receiving the Nobel Prize. Charles Dotter was the first to understand the true potential of endovascular approaches after a chance recanalization that would catapult arterial catheterization first into the cardiovascular surgical arena, then into neurosurgery for intracranial stenoses. Having been meticulously evaluated and compared with open vascular procedures, endovascular neurosurgery has continued to be refined and optimized. Understanding the history and development of these techniques and their applications in neurosurgery is necessary to appreciate the current clinical utility of these procedures, serving to provide the vascular neurosurgeon a greater array of treatment options for patients. Here we explore the major scientific and technological advancements that facilitated the development of the endovascular approach to cerebral revascularization, as well as current indications and ongoing clinical trials.

El anfiteatro endovascular / The endovascular amphitheatre

No disponible

The 25th anniversary of the retrograde suction decompression technique (Dallas technique) for the surgical management of paraclinoid aneurysms: historical background, systematic review, and pooled analysis of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms frequently require temporary occlusion to facilitate safe clipping. Brisk retrograde flow through the ophthalmic artery and cavernous ICA branches make simple trapping inadequate to soften the aneurysm. The retrograde suction decompression (RSD), or Dallas RSD, technique was described in 1990 in an attempt to overcome some of those treatment limitations. A frequent criticism of the RSD technique is an allegedly high risk of cervical ICA dissection. An endovascular modification was introduced in 1991 (endovascular RSD) but no studies have compared the 2 RSD variations. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science and identified all studies from 1990-2016 in which either Dallas RSD or endovascular RSD was used for treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. A pooled analysis of the data was completed to identify important demographic and treatment-specific variables. The primary outcome measure was defined as successful aneurysm obliteration. Secondary outcome variables were divided into overall and RSD-specific morbidity and mortality rates. RESULTS: Twenty-six RSD studies met the inclusion criteria (525 patients, 78.9% female). The mean patient age was 53.5 years. Most aneurysms were unruptured (56.6%) and giant (49%). The most common presentations were subarachnoid hemorrhage (43.6%) and vision changes (25.3%). The aneurysm obliteration rate was 95%. The mean temporary occlusion time was 12.7 minutes. Transient or permanent morbidity was seen in 19.9% of the patients. The RSD-specific complication rate was low (1.3%). The overall mortality rate was 4.2%, with 2 deaths (0.4%) attributable to the RSD technique itself. Good or fair outcome were reported in 90.7% of the patients.Aneurysm obliteration rates were similar in the 2 subgroups (Dallas RSD 94.3%, endovascular RSD 96.3%, p = 0.33). Despite a higher frequency of complex (giant or ruptured) aneurysms, Dallas RSD was associated with lower RSD-related morbidity (0.6% vs 2.9%, p = 0.03), compared with the endovascular RSD subgroup. There was a trend toward higher mortality in the endovascular RSD subgroup (6.4% vs 3.1%, p = 0.08). The proportion of patients with poor neurological outcome at last follow-up was significantly higher in the endovascular RSD group (15.4% vs 7.2%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of paraclinoid ICA aneurysms using the RSD technique is associated with high aneurysm obliteration rates, good long-term neurological outcome, and low RSD-related morbidity and mortality. Review of the RSD literature showed no evidence of a higher complication rate associated with the Dallas technique compared with similar endovascular methods. On a subgroup analysis of Dallas RSD and endovascular RSD, both groups achieved similar obliteration rates, but a lower RSD-related morbidity was seen in the Dallas technique subgroup. Twenty-five years after its initial publication, RSD remains a useful neurosurgical technique for the management of large and giant paraclinoid aneurysms.

History of the diagnosis and treatment of critical limb ischemia and diabetic foot.

The history of the recognition and surgical treatment of lower limb ischemia dates back to the Middle Ages. The twin Saints Comas and Damian were ascribed to have saved a gangrenous limb in the 13th century and became patrons of future surgeons. The physicians that followed developed the theories of blood flow, anatomy of the arterial circulation, and recognition that occlusive disease was the cause of limb ischemia and gangrene. Innovative physicians developed the techniques of arterial surgery and bypass grafting to restore limb blood flow and allow healing of lesions. In the 1960s, the era of endovascular intervention by the pioneering work of Charles Dotter, who developed techniques to image diseased arteries during a recanalization procedure. The development of guide wires, angioplasty balloons, and stents quickly followed. Management of lower limb ischemia and the diabetic foot will continue to evolve, building on the history and passion of preceding physicians and surgeons.

Microballoon-related interventions in various endovascular treatments of body trunk lesions.

Occlusion balloon catheters of 5.2- or 6-French have been used for a few decades in various endovascular treatments of body trunk vascular lesions. However, these catheters may be difficult to place in cases of excessive vessel tortuosity, small vessels, and anatomic complexity. Recently, the introduction of the double lumen microballoon catheters for body trunk vascular lesions has allowed operators to advance them into more distal, smaller, and more tortuous vessels. Since the launch of the first generation microballoon catheters onto the market in Japan in 2011, the microballoon catheters have evolved and are now generally available for clinical use. The purpose of this article is to review the evolution and current clinical applications of the microballoon catheters in the field of interventional radiology.

Construyendo la historia de la cirugía endovascular / Creating the history of endovascular surgery

Se relata la aparición de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva y dentro de ella la técnicas endovasculares, en relación con la evolución sociocultural de las relaciones médico-paciente desde la era del llamado paternalismo médico hasta que una vez aparecidos los derechos humanos y los derechos de los enfermos, estos pasan a tener autonomía sobre su salud y la técnicas diagnósticas y terapéuticas que reciben. Finalmente se relata brevemente la historia de las técnicas endovasculares y se propone formalmente el nombre de Cirugía Endovascular para englobarlas y se hacen unas consideraciones finales sobre la actual tecnolatría hacia el desarrollo tecnológico que conllevan (AU)

The appearance of minimally invasive surgery, and within it, the endovascular techniques, in relation to the sociocultural evolution of the doctor-patient relationship from the era of the so-called medical paternalism that, once the human rights and the rights of the patients came on the scene, patients gained freedom as regards their health, diagnosis and therapeutic techniques they receive. Finally, the history of endovascular techniques is briefly described, and the name Endovascular Surgery is formally proposed to include these. Finally, some thoughts are expressed on the current technolatry and the technological developments they entail (AU)

Cirugía aórtica: ¿un arte en decadencia? / Aortic surgery: an art in decline?

No disponible

Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.

A type B dissection involves the aorta distal to the subclavian artery, and accounts for 25-40% of aortic dissections. Approximately 75% of these are uncomplicated with no malperfusion or ischemia. Multiple consensus statements recommend thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as the treatment of choice for acute complicated type B aortic dissections, while uncomplicated type B dissections are traditionally treated with medical management alone, including strict blood pressure control, as open repairs have a prohibitively high morbidity of up to 31%. However, with medical treatment alone, the morbidity, including aneurysm degeneration of the affected segment, is 30%, and mortality is 10% over 5 years. For both chronic and acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissections, emerging evidence supports the use of both best medical therapy and TEVAR. This paper reviews the current diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated type B aortic dissections.

El aneurisma de aorta abdominal / The abdominal aortic aneurysm

No disponible