Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 673
Filtrar
1.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 283, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an achievement in the field of minimally invasive surgery. However, the vantage point of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologicalprocedures remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to compare vNOTES with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery, and to determine which procedure is more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecologic procedures. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. The 207 enrolled patients had accepted vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology procedures from February 2021 to March 2022. Surgically relevant information regarding patients who underwent ambulatory surgery was collected, and 64 females underwent vNOTES. RESULTS: Multiple outcomes were analyzed in 207 patients. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery groups in terms of postoperative pain score (0 vs. 1 scores, p = 0.026), duration of anesthesia (90 vs. 101 min, p = 0.025), surgery time (65 vs. 80 min, p = 0.015), estimated blood loss (20 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and intestinal exhaustion time (12.20 vs. 17.14 h, p < 0.001). Treatment with vNOTES resulted in convenience, both with respect to time savings and hemorrhage volume in surgery and with respect to the quality of the prognosis. CONCLUSION: These comprehensive data reveal the capacity of vNOTES to increase surgical efficiency. vNOTES in gynecological procedures may demonstrate sufficient feasibility and provide a new medical strategy compared with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for ambulatory surgery in gynecological procedures.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vagina/cirugía , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tempo Operativo , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio
2.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 34(5): 751-759, 2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719274

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess social determinants of health impacting patients undergoing gynecologic oncology versus combined gynecologic oncology and urogynecology surgeries. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent gynecologic oncology surgeries from 2016 to 2019 in the National Inpatient Sample using the International Classification of Diseases-10 codes. Demographics, including race and insurance status, were compared for patients who underwent gynecologic oncology procedures only (Oncologic) and those who underwent concurrent incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse procedures (Urogynecologic-Oncologic). A logistic regression model assessed variables of interest after adjustment for other relevant variables. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019 the National Inpatient Sample database contained 389 (1.14%) Urogynecologic-Oncologic cases and 33 796 (98.9%) Oncologic cases. Urogynecologic-Oncologic patients were less likely to be white (62.1% vs 68.8%, p=0.02) and were older (median 67 vs 62 years, p<0.001) than Oncologic patients. The Urogynecologic-Oncologic cohort was less likely to have private insurance as their primary insurance (31.9% vs 38.9%, p=0.01) and was more likely to have Medicare (52.2% vs 42.8%, p=0.01). After multivariable analysis, black (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.89, p=0.02) and Hispanic patients (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.10, p=0.02) remained more likely to undergo Urogynecologic-Oncologic surgeries but the primary expected payer no longer differed significantly between the two groups (p=0.95). Age at admission, patient residence, and teaching location remained significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of a large inpatient database we identified notable racial and geographical differences between the cohorts of patients who underwent Urogynecologic-Oncologic and Oncologic procedures.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía
3.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(4): 909-919, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546868

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Various strategies are employed to manage stress urinary incontinence (SUI) during pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. This study was aimed at facilitating shared decision-making by evaluating SUI symptom changes, staged SUI procedures, and their prognostic factors following POP surgery without concomitant SUI intervention. METHODS: We analyzed 2,677 POP surgeries from a population-based observational cohort, excluding patients with prior SUI surgery. The outcome measures were subjective SUI utilizing the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire and number of subsequent SUI procedures. Multivariable linear models were applied to identify predictors of persistent SUI, procedures for persistent SUI, and de novo SUI. The primary assessment occurred at the 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 50% (1,329 out of 2,677) experienced SUI; 35% (354 out of 1,005) resolved, an additional 14% (140 out 1,005) improved, and 5.1% (67 out of 1,308) underwent a procedure for persistent SUI. De novo SUI symptoms developed in 20% (218 out of 1,087), with 3.2% (35 out of 1,087) reporting bothersome symptoms; 0.8% (11 out of 1,347) underwent a procedure for de novo SUI. High baseline symptom severity increased the risk of persistent SUI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-2.53), whereas advanced preoperative apical prolapse decreased the risk (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.93). De novo SUI was more common with advancing age (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), baseline urgency urinary incontinence (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38), and after transvaginal mesh surgery (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.00). It was not dependent on the compartment or preoperative degree of prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: In a pragmatic setting, POP surgery results in a low rate of subsequent SUI procedures.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/etiología , Femenino , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(4): 855-862, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456895

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We compared postoperative complications in elderly patients discharged on POD#0 versus POD#1 after prolapse repair. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement database. A total of 20,984 women 65 years and older who underwent prolapse repair between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, readmission, reoperation, and 30-day postoperative complications were compared in patients discharged on POD#0 versus POD#1. A sensitivity analysis was completed to examine outcomes in patients who underwent an apical prolapse repair. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate for potential confounders. RESULTS: Age, race, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, prolapse repair type, and operative time were significantly different in patients discharged on POD#0 vs POD#1 (all p < 0.01). Patients discharged on POD#0 had significantly fewer postoperative complications (2.63% vs 3.44%) and readmissions (1.56% vs 2.18%, all p < 0.01). On multivariate regression modeling, postoperative discharge day was independently associated with complications, but not with readmissions or reoperation after. Patients who underwent an apical prolapse repair and were discharged on POD#0 had significantly more postoperative complications (3.5% vs 2.5%, p = 0.02) and readmissions (2.42% vs 10.08%, p < 0.01) than those discharged on POD#1. In this group, multivariate regression modeling demonstrated that postoperative discharge day was independently associated with any postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS: For elderly women undergoing prolapse repair, the type of surgery should be considered when determining postoperative admission versus same-day discharge. Admission overnight does not seem to benefit women undergoing vaginal repairs but may decrease overall morbidity and risk of readmission in women undergoing an apical prolapse repair.


Asunto(s)
Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(5): 414-422, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325584

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study racial and ethnic disparities in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online review of all published MIGS RCTs in high-impact journals from 2012 to 2023. PATIENTS: Journals included all first quartile obstetrics and gynecology journals, as well as The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, The British Medical Journal, and The Journal of the American Medical Association. The National Institutes of Health's PubMed and the ClinicalTrials.gov websites were queried using the following search terms from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology's certifying examination bulletin 2022 to obtain relevant trials: adenomyosis, adnexal surgery, abnormal uterine bleeding, cystectomy, endometriosis, fibroids, gynecology, hysterectomy, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, leiomyoma, minimally invasive gynecology, myomectomy, ovarian cyst, and robotic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The US Census Bureau data were used to estimate the expected number of participants. We calculated the enrollment ratio (ER) of actual to expected participants for US trials with available race and ethnicity data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 352 RCTs were identified. Of these, race and/or ethnicity data were available in 65 studies (18.5%). We analyzed the 46 studies that originated in the United States, with a total of 4645 participants. Of these RCTs, only 8 (17.4%) reported ethnicity in addition to race. When comparing published RCT data with expected proportions of participants, White participants were overrepresented (70.8% vs. 59.6%; ER, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-1.81), as well as Black or African American participants (15.4% vs. 13.7%; ER, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.29). Hispanic (6.7% vs. 19.0%; ER, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.27-0.35), Asian (1.7% vs. 6.1%; ER, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20-0.34), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (0.1% vs. 0.3%; ER, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74), and Indian or Alaska Native participants (0.2% vs. 1.3%; ER, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.32) were underrepresented. When comparing race/ethnicity proportions in the 20 states where the RCTs were conducted, Black or African American participants were underrepresented. CONCLUSION: In MIGS RCTs conducted in the United States, White and Black or African American participants are overrepresented compared with other races, and ethnicity is characterized in fewer than one-fifth of trials. Efforts should be made to improve racial and ethnic recruitment equity and reporting in future MIGS RCTs.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Grupos Raciales
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 46(4): 102336, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38159680

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to compare the safety and efficiency outcomes of ambulatory gynaecologic procedures performed under conscious sedation and/or local anaesthetic at 2 Canadian institutions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was completed over 1-year on patients presenting to the ambulatory care centres at 2 Canadian institutions that shared a common care model. Outcomes of interest were lead time (registration to discharge), procedural time, and intraoperative complications. Surgical data was derived from a retrospective chart review and outcomes were compared using the independent t test and one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 1495 and 1098 patients presented to the 2 sites. The average age of patients was 35.5 ± 12.3 years and 41.7 ± 10.2 years. The most commonly performed procedures were dilatation and curettages at the first centre and operative hysteroscopies at the second centre. Average lead times were similar: 170.3 ± 35.8 minutes and 171.6 ± 45.4 minutes (P = 0.45). There was a significant difference in mean procedural time being 9.8 ± 5.5 minutes and 17.0 ± 10.0 minutes (P < 0.001). The rate of minor intraoperative complications was 3.8% and 6.6% (P = 0.002); whereas the rate of major complications was 2.7% and 3.3% (P = 0.43). CONCLUSION: In Canada, the majority of gynaecologic procedures are performed under general anesthesia. By comparing outcomes at 2 separate Canadian centres, we demonstrated the reproducibility of a common ambulatory model for minor gynaecologic procedures, supporting the implementation of similar care models across Canada.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Tempo Operativo
7.
Dermatol Surg ; 49(8): 762-765, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37523594

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Genital aesthetics is a treatment that is increasing in popularity. OBJECTIVE: To clarify public interest in genital aesthetic procedures among women between 2004 and 2022. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 12 terms including labiaplasty, vaginoplasty, perineoplasty, laser vaginal rejuvenation, labia cosmetic surgery, vaginal cosmetic surgery, vaginal tightening, genital bleaching, hymenoplasty, clitoroplasty, labiaplasty cost, and vaginal laser were reviewed. To evaluate public attention to female genital aesthetic procedures between January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2022, three 6-year periods were compared about the abovementioned 12 terms. RESULTS: Public attention to labiaplasty and hymenoplasty was significantly higher in 2010 to 2016 than in 2004 to 2010 and 2016 to 2022. Vaginoplasty, laser vaginal rejuvenation, and labia cosmetic surgery terms were researched significantly less in 2010 to 2016 and 2016 to 2022 than in 2004 to 2010 (p = .001). Public interest in vaginal tightening and labiaplasty cost significantly increased from 2004 to 2022. Finally, the term vaginal laser was researched most between 2016 and 2022 (p = .001). CONCLUSION: This study found that public attention to labiaplasty cost and vaginal tightening continuously increased between 2004 and 2022. In addition, public interest in the term vaginal laser significantly increased after 2016. By contrast, vaginoplasty, laser vaginal rejuvenation, and labia cosmetic surgery terms were researched significantly less after 2010.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Motor de Búsqueda , Vagina , Humanos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/estadística & datos numéricos , Vagina/cirugía , Cuello del Útero/cirugía , Motor de Búsqueda/estadística & datos numéricos , Cultura Popular , Perineo/cirugía , Vulva/cirugía
8.
Future Oncol ; 18(8): 965-977, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105169

RESUMEN

Aim: This study evaluated treatment patterns, healthcare resource use and healthcare costs among newly diagnosed US patients with cervical or endometrial cancer. Materials & methods: The authors identified patients diagnosed between 2015 and 2018, described them by line of therapy (LOT), then summarized all-cause per patient per month healthcare resource use and healthcare costs per LOT. Results: Among 1004 patients with cervical cancer and 2006 patients with endometrial cancer, 65.2 and 71.4%, respectively, received at least LOT1. Common treatment modalities in LOT1 were surgery (cervical, 58.0%; endometrial, 92.6%), radiation therapy (cervical, 49.8%; 24.7%) and systemic therapy (cervical, 53.3%; endometrial, 26.1%). Mean per patient per month costs per LOT were pre-treatment (cervical, US$17,210; endometrial, US$14,601), LOT1 (cervical, US$10,929; endometrial, US$6859), LOT2 (cervical, US$15,183; endometrial, US$10,649) and LOT3+ (cervical, US$19,681; endometrial, US$9206). Conclusion: Overall, newly diagnosed patients with cervical or endometrial cancer received guideline-recommended treatment. Outpatient visits mainly drove healthcare costs across LOTs.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Endometriales/economía , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radioterapia/economía , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/economía , Adulto Joven
9.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 24(1): 15-19, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35077040

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A paraovarian cyst (POC) is located between the ovary and the fallopian tube. In many cases POCs are diagnosed and managed as ovarian cysts. But since POC are a distinct entity in their clinical presentation and surgical intervention, they should be better defined. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical perioperative and operative characteristics of patients with POCs in order to improve pre-operative diagnosis and management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with an operative diagnosis of POC between 2007 and 2019 in a single university-affiliated tertiary care medical center was included. Demographic characteristics as well as symptoms, sonographic appearance, surgery findings, and histology results were retrieved from electronic medical records. RESULTS: During the study period 114 patients were surgically diagnosed with POC, 57.9% were in their reproductive years and 24.6% were adolescents. Most presented with abdominal pain (77.2%). Preoperative sonographic exams accurately diagnosed POC in only 44.7% of cases, and 50.9% underwent surgery due to suspected torsion, which was surgically confirmed in 70.7% of cases. Among women with confirmed torsion, 28.9% involved the fallopian tube without involvement of the ipsilateral ovary. Histology results showed benign cysts in all cases, except two, with a pathological diagnosis of serous borderline tumor. CONCLUSIONS: POC should always be part of the differential diagnosis of women presenting with lower abdominal pain and sonographic evidence of adnexal cysts. If POC is suspected there should be a high level of suspicion for adnexal torsion and low threshold for surgical intervention, especially in adolescent, population who are prone to torsion.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal , Quistes , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Quistes Ováricos/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Quistes/diagnóstico , Quistes/epidemiología , Quistes/fisiopatología , Quistes/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Anomalía Torsional/diagnóstico , Anomalía Torsional/etiología , Ultrasonografía/métodos
10.
BJOG ; 129(1): 120-126, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34258859

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and risk factors for perioperative blood transfusions after urogenital fistula repairs in Uganda. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A community hospital in Masaka, Uganda. POPULATION: Women who underwent fistula repair at the Kitovu Hospital between 2013 and 2019. METHODS: Retrospective review of demographics and clinical perioperative characteristics of patients surgically treated for urogenital fistula. Patient characteristics were compared between those who did and those who did not require a blood transfusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Need for perioperative blood transfusion and risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 546 patients treated for urogenital fistulas were included in this study. The median age was 31.1 ± 13.2 years. A vaginal surgical approach was used in the majority of patients (84.6%). Complications occurred in 3.5% of surgical repairs, and the incidence of blood transfusions was 6.2%. In multivariable analyses, for each gram per deciliter (g/dl) increase in preoperative haemoglobin, the odds of blood transfusion decreased by approximately 28% (adjusted OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.86). Women who had their fistula repaired abdominally were 3.4 times more likely to require transfusions (95% CI 1.40-8.08). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of blood transfusions among urogenital fistula repairs in our population is twice that of developed nations. An abdominal surgical approach to urogenital fistula is a significant risk factor for perioperative blood transfusions. The timing of the repair may warrant further study. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: One of the first studies to look at blood transfusion risk factors after fistula repair in a low-resource setting.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/cirugía , Fístula Vesicovaginal/cirugía , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Área sin Atención Médica , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Uganda/epidemiología
11.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(1): 97-102, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33629630

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) who responded to medical treatment and those who underwent surgical intervention due to medical treatment failure. Electronic medical records were evaluated retrospectively to identify patients who were diagnosed with TOA. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data including white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared between the medical treatment group and the surgical intervention group. Patient age, TOA diameter, WBC count, CRP, and ESR were significantly different between the groups. On multiple regression analysis, significant correlations were identified between age (p = .001), ESR (p = .045), and failure of medical treatment. TOA diameter (p = .065) showed a borderline association with surgical intervention. The risk of needing surgical intervention in TOA patients can be predicted using ESR in addition to age and TOA size as risk factors.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? For patients diagnosed with a tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA), the size of TOA and the patient's age are helpful for early identification of patients who are likely to need surgical treatment. Inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and white blood cell are also associated with the risk of surgical intervention.What do the results of this study add? Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in addition to the size of TOA and the patient's age is a useful marker in determining whether to undergo surgery in patients with TOA.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? ESR combined with the patient's age and the size of TOA is clinically useful in predicting the need for early surgical intervention in patients with TOA. Large prospective controlled studies are required to establish relationship between inflammatory markers and the risk of surgical intervention.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas Hematológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Ovario/cirugía , Absceso Abdominal/sangre , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas/sangre , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Pruebas Hematológicas/métodos , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Enfermedades del Ovario/sangre , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
12.
N Z Med J ; 134(1546): 38-46, 2021 11 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34855732

RESUMEN

AIMS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI) are common gynaecological conditions that are amenable to surgical management. The prevalence of these conditions has not been well studied in the New Zealand population, but limited evidence suggests that Maori women are likely to have a higher prevalence of POP and UI than non-Maori women. The aim of this study was to formally document the rate of access to these surgical procedures for Maori and non-Maori women in the area served by Southern District Health Board (SDHB). METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study of women who underwent surgical management for POP and/or UI at SDHB facilities between 2015 and 2019 was performed. RESULTS: Unadjusted results suggested that there was a difference in the accessibility of operations for Maori and non-Maori. However, standardisation for the difference in the age structures of the two populations showed that Maori and non-Maori women access gynaecological surgery for POP and UI at very similar rates. CONCLUSIONS: We have documented that the standardised rates for Maori and non-Maori women accessing POP and UI surgery are similar in SDHB. Owing to the likely greater prevalence of these conditions in Maori women, the near equality of standardised rates of surgical intervention is likely to represent an inequity of access for Maori women.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico , Nueva Zelanda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
13.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(5): 738-746, 2021 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34619737

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the utilization of minimally invasive adnexal surgery, including ovarian cystectomy and oophorectomy, among women with benign gynecologic diseases and compare the associated morbidity and mortality of minimally invasive and open surgery. METHODS: Women with benign ovarian pathology who underwent an ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy from 2016 through 2018 in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases were included. Patients with a diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy or concurrent hysterectomy were excluded. Population-level weighted estimates were developed, and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and hospital charges were examined based on surgical approach for each procedure. RESULTS: The cohort included 351,207 women who underwent oophorectomy and 220,893 women who underwent cystectomy, when weighted representing 547,836 and 328,408 patients, respectively, nationwide. A minimally invasive surgical approach was used in 294,190 (89.6%) patients who underwent ovarian cystectomy, and in 478,402 (87.3%) of patients who underwent oophorectomy. Use of minimally invasive surgery for cystectomy increased from 88.7% in 2016 to 91.0% in 2018, and the rate of minimally invasive surgery for oophorectomy increased from 85.8% to 88.7% over the same time period (P<.001 for both). The complication rates for ovarian cystectomy were 2.7% for minimally invasive surgery and 8.8% for laparotomy (P<.001); for oophorectomy the complication rate was 3.1% for minimally invasive surgery and 22.9% for laparotomy (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgery is used in the majority of women who are undergoing oophorectomy and ovarian cystectomy for benign indications. Compared with laparotomy, minimally invasive surgery is associated with fewer complications.


Asunto(s)
Quistes/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/tendencias , Ovariectomía/tendencias , Ovario/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Anexos/mortalidad , Enfermedades de los Anexos/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/tendencias , Humanos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ovariectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
BJOG ; 128(13): 2191-2199, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34478604

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There are concerns regarding the risks of mid-urethral slings (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), particularly because of the lack of long-term data. We compare patient-reported outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of retropubic (TVT, GYNECARE™) versus transobturator (TOT, MONARC™) tape surgery at 12 years. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multicentre study was performed in 11 tertiary referral centres. POPULATION: A cohort of 180 participants from the original trial, the majority of whom had mixed urinary incontinence. METHODS: Postal questionnaire survey of patient-reported outcome measures using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire (PGI-I) and a numeric rating scale pain questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of the efficacy and complications between the TVT and TOT procedures in the long term. RESULTS: A total of 110/180 responses were received: 55 for TVT and 55 for TOT. The mean follow-up was 12.8 ± 0.29 years (SD). TVT was significantly superior to TOT: 41.8% TVT with no SUI, versus 21.8% TOT (P = 0.04). Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) was the most bothersome urinary symptom: 14.5% of respondents reported UUI after TVT and TOT. This was an improvement from the baseline levels: 61.8% TVT and 76.4% TOT. Seventeen patients (9 TVT and 8 TOT) out of 121 reported moderate or severe pain with severe pain in 3 with TVT and 2 with TOT. Overall, 80% TVT and 77% TOT participants reported their symptoms as improved on the PGI-I. CONCLUSIONS: TVT is superior to TOT for SUI cure. Efficacy is reduced by 12 years. There is low incidence of severe vaginal or groin pain. Careful patient counselling on long-term outcomes is required. The Retropubic tape appears to be an effective treatment for the majority of women with SUI. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Retropubic tape has superior efficacy to transobturator tape. Complications are comparable with low rates.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Cabestrillo Suburetral/estadística & datos numéricos , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Cabestrillo Suburetral/clasificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/etiología
15.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ; 2021: 5528334, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34471341

RESUMEN

This study is aimed at evaluating the results of the universal preoperative screening for COVID-19 in gynecologic cases operated on during its outbreak in a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. A retrospective descriptive study was done on all patients who underwent elective or emergency gynecologic surgeries during the pandemic period in Thailand (April 15 to June 5, 2020). The COVID-19 screening results by symptom-based screening, risk-based screening, and RT-PCR for COVID-19 were collected from the electronic medical records. Among 129 patients who underwent gynecologic surgeries, none had a positive RT-PCR for COVID-19. Symptom-based screening found no patients with positive symptoms for COVID-19. Risk-based screening found 4 patients (3.1%) who were in contact with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases and 4 patients (3.1%) who were healthcare personnel. In conclusion, routine preoperative RT-PCR for COVID-19 may need to be reconsidered among asymptomatic individuals in a low-prevalence country during the well-controlled COVID-19 situation. Larger studies are required to ascertain the benefit of universal preoperative COVID-19 testing.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Tailandia/epidemiología
16.
Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol. (En línea) ; 86(4): 347-352, ago. 2021. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388669

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN: La pandemia de COVID-19 ha comportado una disminución de la consulta ginecológica al servicio de urgencia. OBJETIVO: Caracterizar las consultas en el servicio de urgencia ginecológica, evaluando la cantidad de hospitalizaciones, la necesidad de intervención quirúrgica y los factores de morbilidad, entre otros, comparado a la situación con la previa a la pandemia. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte no concurrente de pacientes hospitalizadas tras una consulta espontánea al servicio de urgencia ginecológica entre las semanas 12 y 28 de 2019 y 2020 en el Hospital Clínico de la Pontificia Universidad Católica, en Santiago (Chile). Se determinaron distintos factores de morbilidad: diagnóstico de ingreso, intervención quirúrgica, complicación operatoria, días de hospitalización, hemoglobina/hematocrito de ingreso y necesidad de transfusión de unidades sanguíneas. RESULTADOS: Hubo 511 consultas al servicio de urgencia entre las semanas 12 y 28 del año 2019, en comparación con 196 el año 2020. En 2019 fueron hospitalizadas 103 mujeres, y en 2020 ingresaron 72 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3). Disminuyó el ingreso por aborto retenido (24 vs. 12; p = 0.01), mientras que aumentó el ingreso por metrorragia posmenopáusica (9 vs 22; p = 0.01). No hubo cambio en las intervenciones quirúrgicas realizadas (86.4% vs. 84.7%; p = 0.7). Aumentaron los días de hospitalización (2.3 vs. 3.1; p < 0.0001) y la necesidad de transfusión sanguínea (2 vs. 7; p = 0.02; OR: 5.4; intervalo de confianza: 1.09-26). CONCLUSIONES: La pandemia de COVID-19 provocó una disminución en la consulta espontánea por patología ginecológica al servicio de urgencia, provocando un aumento en la relación consulta/ingreso y una mayor morbilidad en las pacientes hospitalizadas, caracterizada por una mayor necesidad de transfusión sanguínea y un aumento de los días de hospitalización.


INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has meant a decrease in gynecological visits to the emergency department. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the attending in the gynecological emergency service, evaluating the amount of admissions, hospitalizations, need for surgical intervention, morbidity factors, among others, compared to the pre-pandemic situation. METHOD: A non-concurrent cohort study of hospitalized patients was carried out through a spontaneous attending to the gynecological emergency service between weeks 12 and 28 of 2019 and 2020 at the Hospital Clínico of the Pontificia Universidad Católica, in Santiago (Chile). Different morbidity factors were measured: admission diagnosis, surgical intervention, surgical complication, hospital stay, admission hemoglobin, and need for transfusion of blood units. RESULTS: A total of 511 visitors to the emergency service were registered between weeks 12 and 28 of 2019, compared to 196 in 2020. In 2019 and 2020, 103 and 72 women were hospitalized respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3). Admission for pregnancy loss decreased (24 vs. 12; p = 0.01), while admission for postmenopausal bleeding increased (9 vs. 22; p = 0.01). There was no change in the surgical interventions performed (86.4% vs. 84.7%; p = 0.7). The hospital stays increased (2.3 vs. 3.1; p < 0.0001) and the need for blood transfusion (2 vs. 7; p = 0.02; OR: 5.4; confidence interval: 1.09-26). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a decrease in spontaneous attending for gynecological pathology at the emergency service, causing an increase in the attend/admission ratio and greater morbidity in hospitalized patients characterized by a greater need for blood transfusion and an increase on the hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea , Intervalos de Confianza , Chile , Estudios de Cohortes , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación
17.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 43(2): 205-214, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34247989

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes and acceptance rates of an oocyte accumulation programme in young women with benign ovarian tumour (BOT)? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study conducted at the Academic Assisted Reproductive Technology and Fertility Preservation Centre, Lille University Hospital, between January 2016 and December 2019. The number of metaphase II oocytes per cycle and per patient after accumulation were evaluated. Two groups were identified for the analysis: endometrioma ('endometrioma') and dermoid, mucinous or serous cyst ('other cysts'). RESULTS: A total of 113 fertility-preservation cycles were analysed in 70 women aged 27.9 ± 4.8 years. Almost all women had undergone previous ovarian surgery before fertility preservation (89%). Mean anti-Müllerian hormone levels before ovarian stimulation was 12.5 ± 8.7 pmol/l. A total of 6.4 ± 3.4 oocytes were retrieved, and 4.3 ± 3.4 metaphase II (MII) oocytes were vitrified per cycle. All agreed to the oocyte accumulation programme and all underwent at least one cycle. To date, 36 (51%) patients achieved two or three fertility- preservation cycles. After accumulation, 7.0 ± 5.23 MII oocytes were vitrified per patient. No difference was found in ovarian response and oocyte cohort between the 'endometrioma' and 'other cysts' groups. Questionnaires completed after oocyte retrieval revealed abdominal bloating and pelvic pain in most patients, with no difference according to the type of cyst. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte accumulation should be systematically offered to young women with BOT irrespective of histological type, as it seems to be well-tolerated. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the efficiency of oocyte accumulation to optimize the chances of subsequent pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/rehabilitación , Quistes Ováricos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Inducción de la Ovulación , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Criopreservación/métodos , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/complicaciones , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/epidemiología , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/patología , Cistoadenoma Mucinoso/terapia , Cistadenoma Seroso/complicaciones , Cistadenoma Seroso/epidemiología , Cistadenoma Seroso/patología , Cistadenoma Seroso/terapia , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Endometriosis/patología , Endometriosis/terapia , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recuperación del Oocito/métodos , Recuperación del Oocito/estadística & datos numéricos , Quistes Ováricos/complicaciones , Quistes Ováricos/epidemiología , Quistes Ováricos/patología , Quistes Ováricos/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Reserva Ovárica/fisiología , Ovario/cirugía , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Inducción de la Ovulación/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Teratoma/complicaciones , Teratoma/epidemiología , Teratoma/patología , Teratoma/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
18.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(5): 548.e1-548.e10, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34147495

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High-volume and fellowship-trained surgeons have superior outcomes. However, in gynecology, a large proportion of cases are performed by low-volume surgeons. Simulation has been shown to be useful in assessing surgical skill and may be a useful tool in hospital credentialing and maintenance of privileges. OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between a surgical case volume and fellowship training with performance on simulated procedural tasks. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 108 obstetricians and gynecologists with laparoscopic privileges at 2 academic institutions completed a pre-test survey and performed 3 tasks on the LapSim laparoscopic virtual reality simulator. The pre-test survey inquired about the monthly laparoscopic case volume and prior training. Simulations included a basic skills task (peg transfer) followed by a procedural task (salpingectomy) of 2 difficulty levels (low and moderate). Spearman correlation and Wilcoxon tests were used to determine correlations between the survey responses and performance metrics. RESULTS: Participants included 67 generalists (62%) and 41 fellowship-trained specialists (38%). There was an observed weak correlation among surgical volume (more than 6 cases per month), time to completion, and the amount of blood loss when performing the low-difficulty level salpingectomy (r=-0.32, P=.0007 and r=-0.29, P=.002, respectively). The economy of movement (instrument path length) was correlated to high surgical volume (r=-0.35, P=.0002). Compared with generalists, surgeons with fellowship training performed tasks faster (410.8 seconds [interquartile range, 309.7-595.2]) vs 530.2 seconds (interquartile range, 406.2-605.0; P=.0009), more efficiently at 6.1 m (interquartile range, 4.8-7.3) vs 8.1 m (interquartile range, 5.8-10.7; P=.0003), and with less blood loss at 21.7 mL (interquartile range, 11.8-37.7) vs 42.9 mL (interquartile range, 18.1-70.6; P=.002). Regarding the case volume and fellowship background, there was no difference in ovarian diathermy damage. In addition, there was no difference among most performance parameters for the peg transfer task and the moderate-difficulty salpingectomy procedure. CONCLUSION: Surgical experience obtained through higher case volume and fellowship training correlate with higher performance scores during simulated procedural tasks. In a previous study, we found a similar correlation with simulated basic skills tasks. The current study is a continuation of an ongoing quality initiative to establish a summative assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills using virtual reality simulator for the maintenance of credentials among obstetrical and gynecologic surgeons. Future studies will compare the performance metrics from laparoscopic procedures performed on virtual reality simulator with the performance in the operating room and clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Becas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología , Laparoscopía/educación , Obstetricia , Entrenamiento Simulado , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Competencia Clínica , Simulación por Computador , Ginecología/educación , Humanos , Obstetricia/educación , Realidad Virtual
20.
Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol. (En línea) ; 86(3): 291-300, jun. 2021. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388663

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN: La endometriosis intestinal afecta en gran medida la calidad de vida de una mujer joven y habitualmente requiere un tratamiento quirúrgico con resección intestinal. Esta cirugía es técnicamente compleja por las adherencias firmes del intestino a la vagina, el útero y los ovarios. OBJETIVO: Describir y analizar los resultados quirúrgicos e histopatológicos de las resecciones intestinales por endometriosis grave durante los últimos 18 años en el Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, en relación con la introducción de la unidad multidisciplinaria de endometriosis, a partir del año 2011, y las experiencias publicadas en la literatura chilena y extranjera. MÉTODO: Trabajo retrospectivo realizado en un hospital terciario desde el año 2001 hasta el año 2019. Las pacientes se asignaron a dos grupos según el período de cirugía: grupo 2001-2010 y grupo 2011-2019, luego de la introducción de la unidad de endometriosis. Se recopilaron todas las pacientes a las que se realizó una resección intestinal (discoidal o segmentaria) por endometriosis, por laparotomía o laparoscopía. Los datos distribuidos normalmente se presentan como promedio ± DE y los datos no paramétricos como mediana (rango). Las comparaciones demográficas de variables continuas se hicieron con la prueba t de Student y las de las variables categóricas con las pruebas de ji al cuadrado o de Fisher. La significación estadística se estableció en p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Se recopilaron 52 casos. El 94,2% de las cirugías fueron electivas. El 5,8% fueron de urgencia por obstrucción intestinal (todas entre 2001 y 2010). Un 75% de las cirugías fueron laparoscópicas. Se realizó resección segmentaria en el 67,3%, resección discoidal simple en el 28,8%, resección discoidal doble en el 1,9% y resección segmentaria y una discoidal en el 1,9%. La histopatología demostró compromiso de la lesión hasta la mucosa intestinal en un 7,7%. Hubo franca disminución del dolor en el seguimiento de las pacientes. El 24% de las pacientes con deseo de embarazo y endometriosis intestinal lograron un parto de término mediante fecundación in vitro o espontáneamente. Hubo cuatro complicaciones posoperatorias, tres de ellas de categoría II según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo y una de categoría IV A con reintervención a las 72 horas. Al comparar ambos periodos, en 2001-2010 los exámenes diagnósticos utilizados fueron ecografía transvaginal (0%), enema baritado (60%), tomografía computarizada de abdomen y pelvis (45%) y resonancia magnética pelviana (20%), mientras que en 2011-2019 fueron ecografía transvaginal (100%), enema baritado (3%), tomografía computarizada (3%) y resonancia magnética pelviana (66%). En 2001-2010, las lesiones fueron más más infiltrativas (mayor compromiso mucoso y submucoso) (75 vs. 16% de las resecciones intestinales; p < 0,05), estenóticas (cirugías de urgencia por obstrucción), con mayor porcentaje de resecciones segmentarias (100 vs. 46,9%; p < 0,05) y más días de hospitalización (5,8 ± 2,3 vs. 4,1 ± 0,9 días) que en 2011-2019. CONCLUSIONES: A nuestro entender, esta es la serie más grande publicada en Chile de resecciones intestinales por endometriosis. Estos hallazgos demuestran cómo la introducción de la unidad multidisciplinaria de endometriosis permite un diagnóstico precoz y un tratamiento quirúrgico eficaz y oportuno, tal como se decribe en la literatura.


INTRODUCTION: Bowel endometriosis severely affects a young woman's quality of life and often requires surgical treatment with bowel resection. This surgery is technically complex due to the tight adhesions of the intestine to the vagina, uterus, and ovaries. The objective of this work is to describe and analyze the surgical and histopathological results of intestinal resections for severe endometriosis during the last 18 years at the Clinical Hospital University of Chile, in relation to the implementation of the multidisciplinary endometriosis unit, based on the year 2011 and the experiences published in Chilean and foreign literature. METHOD: Retrospective work carried out in a tertiary hospital from 2001 to 2019. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the surgery period: group 2001-2010 and group 2011-2019, after endometriosis unit formation. All patients who underwent bowel resection (discoidal or segmental) for endometriosis by laparotomy or laparoscopy were collected. Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± SD and nonparametric data as median (range). Demographic comparisons of continuous variables are compared using Student's t test and categorical variables using chi squared or Fisher's test. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 52 cases were collected. 94.2% of the surgeries were elective. 5.8% were urgent due to intestinal obstruction (all between 2001 and 2010). 75% of the surgeries were laparoscopic. Segmental resection 67.3%, simple discoidal resection 28.8%, double discoidal resection 1.9% and segmental resection and a discoidal resection 1.9%. Histopathology showed involvement of the lesion up to the intestinal mucosa in 7.7%. A marked decrease in pain in the follow-up of the patients. 24% of the patients with a desire for pregnancy and intestinal endometriosis achieved a full-term delivery by IVF or spontaneously. There were four postoperative complications, three of them category II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and one category IV A complication with reoperation at 72 h. When comparing both periods, between 2001-2010 the diagnostic tests used were: transvaginal ultrasound (ECO TV) (0%), barium enema (BE) (60%), abdomen pelvis CT (45%) and pelvic resonance (MRI) (20%). Between 2011 and 2019 ECO TV (100%), EB (3%), TAC (3%) RM (66%). In the period 2001 to 2010, the lesions were more infiltrative (greater mucosal and submucosal involvement) (75% vs 16% of intestinal resections (P <0.05)), stenotic (urgent surgery for obstruction), with a higher percentage of resections segmental (100% vs 46.9% (P <0.05) and more days of hospitalization (5.8 ± 2.3 SD vs 4.1 ± 0.9 SD) than in the period from 2011 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest series published in Chile of intestinal resections for endometriosis. These findings demonstrate how the introduction of the multidisciplinary endometriosis unit allows early diagnosis and effective and timely surgical treatment as described in the literature.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades Intestinales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/patología , Hospitales Universitarios , Tiempo de Internación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...