Influence of domain interactions on conformational mobility of the progesterone receptor detected by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry.

Structural and functional details of the N-terminal activation function 1 (AF1) of most nuclear receptors are poorly understood due to the highly dynamic intrinsically disordered nature of this domain. A hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) mass-spectrometry-based investigation of TATA box-binding protein (TBP) interaction with various domains of progesterone receptor (PR) demonstrate that agonist-bound PR interaction with TBP via AF1 impacts the mobility of the C-terminal AF2. Results from HDX and other biophysical studies involving agonist- and antagonist-bound full-length PR and isolated PR domains reveal the molecular mechanism underlying synergistic transcriptional activation mediated by AF1 and AF2, dominance of PR-B isoform over PR-A, and the necessity of AF2 for full AF1-mediated transcriptional activity. These results provide a comprehensive picture elaborating the underlying mechanism of PR-TBP interactions as a model for studying nuclear receptor (NR)-transcription factor functional interactions.

Quantitative analysis of gene regulation by seven clinically relevant progestins suggests a highly similar mechanism of action through progesterone receptors in T47D breast cancer cells.

Progesterone (P4) is an essential reproductive steroid hormone required for many aspects of female reproductive physiology. Progestins are compounds that demonstrate progesterone-like activity and are used in oral contraception, hormone therapy, and treatment of some reproductive disorders, but differ widely in their chemical structures, potency, and pharmacokinetics. While numerous studies have assessed progestins on specific endpoints, little is known about the activation of global gene expression by progestins. We used Affymetrix GeneChip U133A expression arrays to examine the action of P4 and six clinically relevant synthetic progestins (3-ketodesogestrel, drospirenone, levonorgestrel, medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethindrone acetate, and trimegestone) on the progesterone receptor (PR)-positive T47Dco and the PR-negative T47D-Y breast cancer cell lines. Excluding drospirenone, one or more of the progestins-regulated 329 genes, with 30 genes regulated by at least 2.0-fold by all progestins in the T47Dco cells. The synthetic progestins show a high degree of similarity in their transcriptional responses, and each progestin regulates between 77 and 91% of the genes regulated by P4. Independent quantitative RT-PCR analysis confirmed a similar regulation for S100P, PPL, IL20RA, NET1, ATP1A1, HIG2, and CXCL12 (SDF-1) by all seven progestins. Attempts to find differentially regulated genes by any progestin compared to all other treatments failed, suggesting any differences are quantitative, not qualitative. This analysis demonstrates a high degree of similarity among these progestins on PR-regulated gene expression in T47D cells, suggesting a similar and fairly specific mode of action.

Physical evaluation of a new patch made of a progestomimetic in a silicone matrix.

The adhesion of a new Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS) made of silicone and loaded with a progestomimetic drug was characterised. The goal of this study was to use well-known methods or to adapt them to collect representative data. Individually, methods such as surface tension, peel test and rheology are already widely used. Results show that the choice of a substrate for peel tests can be made in the light of surface tension data and that polymers like poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) are good alternatives to skin. Peeling characterisations are made a function of thickness of films, drug content in active, conditions of preparation and conditions of use such as pressure. Dynamic rheology is more difficult to link to other methods as it mainly reflects internal phenomena and properties that arise in the bulk, as opposed on its surface. Master curves enable results to be used more easily, but the theories to interpret the data are still not powerful enough to replace peel testing.

The steroid promegestone is a noncompetitive antagonist of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor that interacts with the lipid-protein interface.

17,21-Dimethyl-19-nor-pregn-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (promegestone) was used to characterize the mechanism of inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (AChR) by progestin steroids. Promegestone reversibly inhibited ACh-induced currents of Torpedo AChRs expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Between 1-30 microM promegestone produced a concentration-dependent enhancement of the equilibrium binding affinity of [3H]ACh to Torpedo AChR-rich membranes. For AChRs in the presence of agonist (desensitized state) promegestone was a more potent inhibitor of the binding of the noncompetitive antagonist [3H]phencyclidine (IC50 = 9 microM) than of [3H]histrionicotoxin (IC50 approximately 100 microM). To identify AChR domains in contact with the steroid, AChR-rich membranes equilibrated with [3H]promegestone were irradiated at 312 nm, and 3H-labeled amino acids were identified by amino-terminal sequencing of fragments isolated from subunit proteolytic digests. Within AChR alpha-subunit, 70% of 3H was covalently incorporated in a 10-kDa fragment beginning at Asn-339 and containing the M4 membrane spanning segment, and 30% was in a 20-kDa fragment beginning at Ser-173 and containing the M1-M3 segments. Fragments containing the M2 channel domains as well as the M4 segments were isolated from proteolytic digests of AChR subunits and subjected to amino-terminal sequence analysis. No evidence of [3H]promegestone incorporation was detected in any of the M2 segments. The amino acids in the M4 segments labeled by [3H]promegestone were among those previously shown to be in contact with the lipid bilayer (). These results indicate that the steroid promegestone is an AChR noncompetitive antagonist that may alter AChR function by interactions at the lipid-protein interface.

Microbial models of drug metabolism: microbial transformations of Trimegestone (RU27987), a 3-keto-delta(4,9(10))-19-norsteroid drug.

Screening microorganisms for the biotransformation of the 3-keto-delta(4,9(10))-19-norsteroid RU27987 (Trimegestone) resulted in the isolation of nine identified metabolites, some of them being selectively produced by different strains. Eight metabolites were found to be hydroxylated on various positions of the rings, and one was additionally epoxidized. These microbial metabolites could be used as chromatographic standards and two of them were found identical to the unknown major human metabolites. Moreover, most microbial metabolites were produced in sufficient amounts to be tested for their biological activities. All these features demonstrate the usefulness and versatility of microbial biotransformation systems as a tool for early identification and convenient production of potentially active mammalian and non-mammalian metabolites.

In vitro labeling of gonadal steroid hormone receptors in brain tissue sections.

Autoradiographic methods have been developed for measurement of gonadal steroid receptors in situ in brain tissue sections. Based on principles established previously for estrogen receptors in the rat brain using a 125I-labeled ligand, procedures have been developed for in vitro labeling of estrogen, androgen, and progestin receptors with commercially available tritiated ligands. Addition of protamine sulfate to the incubation buffer precipitates the receptors in situ in the tissue sections, allowing them to be detected autoradiographically after incubation with labeled steroid and subsequent washing to remove unbound and nonspecifically bound ligand. Occupied and unoccupied estrogen receptors can be measured selectively using appropriately modified incubation conditions. In the case of androgen and progestin receptors, unoccupied receptors are readily detected by in vitro labeling of tissue sections, but occupied receptors do not appear to label efficiently. Preliminary data suggest that these methods should be equally applicable to a variety of laboratory animals, including the rat, mouse, guinea pig, and monkey.

Progesterone receptor and the mechanism of action of progesterone antagonists.

Currently available progesterone antagonists have been suggested to fall into two categories based on differences in how they interact with and inactivate the progesterone receptor (PR). The anti-progestin ZK98299 (Type I) impairs PR association with DNA, while Type II compounds (RU486, ZK112993, ZK98734) promote PR binding to DNA. Type II agents, therefore, appear to inhibit receptor activity at a step downstream of DNA binding, presumably failing to induce conformational changes in PR structure requird for enhancement of transcription. This paper discusses both published and unpublished data supporting the concept of two types of progestin antagonists. Using PR-mediated induction of reporter genes in breast cancer cells as an assay for biological response, both types of anti-progestins, after correction for difference in steroid binding affinity, inhibit progestin induction substoichiometrically. However, Type II anti-progestins are more potent, inhibiting at lower ratios of antagonist to agonist than ZK98299. This suggests that in addition to behaving by classical competitive mechanisms these compounds (in particular Type II) may exhibit additional activity as transrepressors of PR in the same cell bound to hormone agonist. Transrepression may occur by the combined mechanisms of heterodimerization and competition for binding to DNA. In support of this, mixed ligand dimers form readily in solution between a PR subunit bound to agonist and another bound to either type of anti-progestin, whereas these mixed ligand dimers bind poorly, if at all, to specific progesterone response elements (PREs) in vitro. Additionally, when added as a single ligand, Type II agents increase PR dimerization in solution and PR affinity for PREs as compared with single ligand dimers formed by progestin agonist. This contrasts with ZK98299, when given as a single ligand, which reduces PR affinity for PREs without disrupting solution dimerization. Thus the higher affinity of PR for PREs may account for the greater biological potency of Type II compounds as compared with ZK98299. As a further distinction between types of antiprogestins, ZK98299 minimally stimulates phosphorylation of PR whereas RU486 increases site-specific phosphorylation of PR in a manner indistinguishable from that of hormone agonist. Additionally, ZK98299 is not susceptible in vivo to functional switching to a partial agonist by cross talk with cAMP signal transduction pathways, as occurs with Type II compounds. Thus, ZK98299 under certain conditions may be a more pure antagonist than Type II compounds.