RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a treatment method for prostate cancer (PCa). However, patients usually experience urinary incontinence and a reduction in quality of life after surgery. Seeking a nursing programme is necessary to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing RP. This study aims to explore the effect of the cluster nursing through empowerment education on patients with RP. METHODS: The general data of 203 patients who underwent RP surgery from June 2021 to June 2023 were collected for a retrospective study. After excluding four patients who changed from RP to laparotomy during surgery, four patients with incomplete clinical data and three patients without normal communication ability, the remaining 192 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups in accordance with different nursing plans. In this study, 98 patients receiving the cluster nursing through empowerment education were set as the observation group (OG), and 94 patients undergoing routine nursing were included in the reference group (RG). The indicators of postoperative recovery, mental health status and life coping ability were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The times to first exhaustion, to start eating, of first off-bed activity and of hospitalisation in the OG were shorter than those in the RG (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the total incidence of complications between the two groups (p > 0.05). Before management, no significant difference in the scores of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL) was observed between the OG and RG (p > 0.05). After management, the HADS and ADL scores of the two groups all decreased, and the OG showed a greater reduction in scores than the RG (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The cluster nursing through empowerment education can shorten the recovery time of patients after RP surgery and improve their living ability. This effect is beneficial to their mental health and can provide additional directions for the formulation of subsequent clinical nursing programmes.
Asunto(s)
Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Empoderamiento , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
Sexual concerns after prostate cancer (PCa) treatment are high. Flexible coping is a crucial element to maintaining sexual activity after PCa and improves adaptation outcomes. We aimed to identify potential sexual adaptation styles reported by men following PCa treatment, and to assess relationships among associated variables and outcomes. Individuals (n = 223) with PCa treatment history (e.g., radical prostatectomy [n = 165, 74.0%], external beam radiation [n = 83, 37.2%], hormone/androgen deprivation therapy [n = 83, 37.2%]), completed an online survey assessing sexual variables and processes of sexual adaptation. Using a combination of inductive and deductive coding, open-ended responses were thematically analyzed and grouped into sexual adaptation styles. Factors potentially associated with sexual adaptation styles (e.g., age, perceived partner involvement, co-morbidities, relationship duration, time since PCa treatment, desire for physical affection, depression, relationship adjustment) were tested using multinomial logistic regression. Outcomes of sexual well-being (sexual distress, sexual bother, sexual satisfaction) and relationship adjustment were compared against each sexual adaptation style using a multivariate analysis of variance. Sexual activity status and satisfaction with the adaptation process was assessed across the sexual adaptation styles using a chi-square analysis and post-hoc tests. Two distinct categories were identified: those who had Adapted (n = 185) and those who had Not Adapted (n = 38). Four sexual adaptation styles emerged in the adapted category: Relationship Renegotiation (n = 53) and Sexual Renegotiation (n = 47), which were couples-focused styles, and Acceptance/Resignation (n = 34) and Masturbation/Erection (n = 48), which were individual-focused styles. Participants who could not be categorized as one style, but rather met several, were identified as Mixed (n = 3). Higher rates of depression, lower relationship adjustment, lack of sexual activity, and greater dissatisfaction with the adaptation process were observed for Not Adapted participants. Participants engaged in any type of adaptation style fared better than those who had Not Adapted. Couples-focused styles tended to emphasize renegotiation, including a changed perspective on the expression of the relationship. Perceived direct engagement of the partner facilitated adaptation and emphasized engagement with flexible coping, either through redefining priorities or ways of being sexual. Individual-focused styles emphasized pre-cancer erectile function, and either aimed to return to capacity for penetrative sexual activity or accepted its inaccessibility and largely an abandonment of partnered sexual activity.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Conducta Sexual , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Anciano , Prostatectomía/psicología , Satisfacción Personal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Parejas Sexuales/psicologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyze the degree of psychological distress experienced pre- and postoperatively in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy after being diagnosed with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy without history of psychiatric disorders were included in this study. The degree of psychological distress was evaluated using hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and distress thermometer (DT) questionnaires preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Distress was high preoperatively and decreased over the entire period. In addition, HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression scores showed an improved severity, shifting from an abnormal state to a borderline state in some patients. However, the DT score, including emotional problems, spiritual concerns, physical problems, family problems, and practical problems, was slightly higher at 1 month postoperatively compared to preoperatively. Furthermore, even at 12 months postoperatively, about one fifth of patients surveyed had a DT score of 4 or higher, requiring psychiatric intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Before and after radical prostatectomy, a significant number of patients complained of distress such as anxiety, depression, and insomnia, and they needed help from a specialist because of psychological distress even 12 months postoperatively. Therefore, a close evaluation of the patient's psychological distress and supportive treatment are needed during the entire pre- and postoperative period.
Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Distrés Psicológico , Humanos , Masculino , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugíaRESUMEN
Prostate cancer (PCa) is currently the second most prevalent cancer in the world and the most common type of cancer among Nigerian men. This study explored the lived experiences of patients with PCa at the General Hospital in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. A mixed-method design was adopted. Purposive and consecutive sampling techniques were employed to recruit 50 and 10 participants for the quantitative and qualitative aspects respectively. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis while quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. All participants were above the age of 50 years, 72% earned about $100 monthly while 68% were diagnosed in less than five years. Majority of the participants utilized adaptive coping styles and also found the strategies moderately helpful while living with the effects of radical prostatectomy. Participants also found the high cost of treatment severely challenging. Government and other stakeholders may need to subsidize the cost of PCa management thereby encouraging early accessibility to care, improved adherence to treatment and also reduce the economic burden of the disease on patients and their families.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adaptación Psicológica , Población Negra/psicología , Nigeria/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Población Urbana , Hospitales Generales , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Costo de EnfermedadRESUMEN
Introducción y objetivo: La ansiedad específica del cáncer (CSA) es la reacción psicológica más frecuente tras la prostatectomía radical (PR). Evaluamos la prevalencia de la patología psiquiátrica pretratamiento de cáncer de próstata mediante PR e identificamos la influencia de los diagnósticos psiquiátricos en la supervivencia y pronóstico en los pacientes. Material y métodos Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico observacional, 1.078 varones intervenidos mediante PR por cáncer de próstata órgano-confinado. Grupos: GP: pacientes con patología psiquiátrica previa a la PR; GNP: pacientes sin patología psiquiátrica previa a la PR, variables urológicas, oncológicas y psiquiátricas, estadística descriptiva y análisis multivariante. Resultados El 37,94% presentó algún diagnóstico psiquiátrico. Fue necesario tratamiento adyuvante de radioterapia (RT) en 27,83% y hormonoterapia (HT) en 23,38%; más frecuentes en GP. La supervivencia cáncer-específica fue superior en GNP. La ansiedad, depresión, insomnio, tabaquismo, psicosis y alcoholismo fueron los más frecuentes. La baja estadificación Tumor-Ganglios-Metástasis (TNM) y poca presencia de síntomas del tracto urinario inferior (STUI) e incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo (IUE) incrementó la probabilidad de ausencia de patología psiquiátrica. En GP aumentó la fatiga, disfunción eréctil y deterioro cognitivo tras la PR junto con RT y/o HT. A mayor edad y mayor antígeno prostático específico (PSA) al diagnóstico, aumentó el riesgo relativo de patología psiquiátrica y peor evolución. Los factores más relacionados fueron la PR, PSA, la edad y el tiempo de supervivencia. Conclusiones La patología psiquiátrica está presente en pacientes tratados mediante PR debido a cáncer de próstata, teniendo alto impacto en los resultados de supervivencia y pronóstico (AU)
Introduction and Objective: Cancer-specific anxiety is the most frequently reported psychological response after radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated the prevalence of pretreatment psychiatric pathology in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RP and identified the effects of psychiatric diagnoses on their survival and prognosis. Material and Methods Retrospective multicenter observational study including 1078 men treated with RP for organ-confined prostate cancer. Groups: GP: patients with psychiatric pathology prior to RP; GNP: patients without psychiatric pathology prior to RP. Urological, oncological and psychiatric variables, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were included. Results 37.94% of patients presented a psychiatric diagnosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy was required in 27.83% and hormone therapy in 23.38%; being more frequent in GP. Cancer-specific survival was higher in GNP. Anxiety, depression, insomnia, smoking, psychosis and alcoholism were the most frequent. Low TNM and low presence of LUTS and SUI increased the probability of absence of psychiatric pathology. Fatigue, erectile dysfunction and cognitive impairment after RP with RT and/or HT were higher in GP. Older age and higher PSA at diagnosis increased the relative risk of psychiatric pathology and worse outcome. The most frequently related factors were RP, PSA, age and survival time. Conclusions Psychiatric pathology is present in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, with a high impact on survival and prognostic outcomes (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/métodos , Ansiedad/psicología , Salud Mental , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Análisis de Supervivencia , Prostatectomía/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest that men with good erectile function shortly after radical prostatectomy (RP) can subsequently have worsened erectile function. AIM: To determine the prevalence and predictors of early erectile function recovery post-RP and of worsening erectile function after initial erectile function recovery. METHODS: We retrospectively queried our institutional database. Men who underwent RP during 2008-2017 and who completed the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain both pre-RP and serially post-RP, constituted the population. Functional erections were defined as International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-6 erectile function domain scores ≥24. We analyzed factors predicting functional erections at 3 months post-RP as well as factors predicting a decrease in functional erections between 3 and 6 months, defined as ≥2-point drop in the erectile function domain. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of early erectile function recovery and also of subsequent decline. OUTCOMES: Erectile function recovery rates at 3 months post-RP and predictive factors; rates of erectile function decline between 3-6 months and associated predictors. RESULTS: Eligible patients comprised 1,655 men with median age of 62 (IQR 57, 67) years. Bilateral nerve-sparing (NS) surgery was performed in 71% of men, unilateral NS in 19%, and no NS in 10%. Of this population, 224 men (14%; 95% CI 12%, 15%) had functional erections at 3 months post-RP. On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of early erectile function recovery included: younger age (OR 0.93, P < .001), higher baseline erectile function domain score (OR 1.14, P < .001) and bilateral NS (OR 3.81, P = .002). The presence of diabetes (OR 0.43, P = .028) and a former smoking history (OR 0.63, P = .008; reference group: never smoker) was associated with the erectile dysfunction at 3 months post-RP. Of the men with early functional erections, 41% (95% CI 33%, 48%) had a ≥ 2-point decline in erectile function between 3 and 6 months. No factors were identified as predictors for this decline. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Only a small proportion of men have functional erections at 3 months post-RP and a notable number of them will experience a decline in erectile function between 3 and 6 months. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths: large patient population and the use of validated questionnaire. LIMITATIONS: single-center retrospective study. CONCLUSION: A minority of men had functional erections 3 months post-RP, about half of whom had a decline in erectile function by month 6. We recommend appropriately counseling post-RP patients on the risk of such a decline in erectile function. Salter CA, Tin AL, Bernie HL, et al. Predictors of Worsening Erectile Function in Men with Functional Erections Early After Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2022;19:1790-1796.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil , Humanos , Masculino , Disfunción Eréctil/epidemiología , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Erección Peniana , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Próstata , Recuperación de la FunciónRESUMEN
The personality trait of neuroticism is associated with adverse health outcomes after cancer treatment, but few studies concern men treated for prostate cancer. We examined men with high and low neuroticism treated with radical prostatectomy for curable prostate cancer without relapse. We compared overall problems and domain summary scores (DSSs) between these groups, and if high neuroticism at pre-treatment was a significant predictor of overall problems and DSSs at follow-up. A sample of 462 relapse-free Norwegian men self-rated neuroticism, overall problems, and DSSs by the EPIC-26 before surgery and at three years' follow-up. Twenty-one percent of the sample had high neuroticism. Patients with high neuroticism reported significantly more overall problems and DSSs at pre-treatment. At follow-up, only overall bowel problems and urinary irritation/obstruction and bowel DSSs were different. High neuroticism was a significant predictor of overall bowel problems and bowel and irritation/obstruction DSSs at follow-up. High neuroticism at pre-treatment was significantly associated with a higher rate of overall problems both at pre-treatment and follow-up and had some significant predictions concerning bowel problems and urinary obstruction at follow-up. Screening for neuroticism at pre-treatment could identify patients in need of more counseling concerning later adverse health outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neuroticismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate psychosocial distress in the context of continence and oncological outcome during the early recovery period after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively collected data from 587 patients who underwent inpatient rehabilitation after RP in 2016 and 2017 were analyzed. Psychosocial distress (measured by using a Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients [QSC-R10]) and continence status (urine loss on a 24-h pad test and urine volume on uroflowmetry) were evaluated at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of a 3-week inpatient rehabilitation. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for high distress (QSC-R10 score ≥15). RESULTS: The median patient age was 65 years. At the start of rehabilitation, 204 patients (34.8%) demonstrated high distress. Psychosocial distress decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from a median of 11.0 at T1 (median 16 days after surgery) to a median of 6.0 at T2 (median 37 days after surgery). Complete continence increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 39.0% at T1 to 58.9% at T2. The median urine volume increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 161 mL at T1 to 230 mL at T2. Often, distress is higher in younger patients, whereas incontinence is higher in older patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age ≤69 years (p = 0.001) and tumor stage ≥pT3 (p = 0.006) as independent predictors of high distress. CONCLUSIONS: Distress and incontinence decreased significantly during the 3 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation after RP. Patient age ≤69 years and tumor stage ≥pT3 are independent predictors of high psychosocial distress.
Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/patología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incontinencia Urinaria/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Cuidados Posteriores/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report sexual health outcomes in male patients undergoing open radical cystoprostatectomy using a validated questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beginning in 2017, male patients were asked to complete a validated questionnaire during scheduled post-cystectomy clinic visits that assessed sexual function using the 5 item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and supplemental questions which evaluated libido, orgasm, partner interest, and adequacy of pre-operative counselling. Baseline data and functional outcomes were compared and multivariable analysis performed. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients who met inclusion criteria completed the questionnaire. Pre-operative IIEF-5 was available in 78 patients with a median score of 16 (IQR:5-23). In those patients, median age at cystectomy was 68.9 years (IQR:60.2-72.4) and median duration of follow-up was 17.3 months (IQR:6.3-28.7). Median IIEF-5 score at time of survey completion was 1 (IQR:1-11). Increasing age, shorter follow-up duration, insufficient counselling, and absence of partner interest were predictive of lower scores. Younger age, pre-operative erectile function, and neurovascular preservation were predictive of a higher IIEF-5 score on univariate and multivariate analysis. Median libido score was 2 "low" (IQR:1-3) and ability to orgasm was reported by 34 (43.6%) patients. Neurovascular preservation (OR:3.03 95% CI:1.10-8.26, P = .03) and sufficient preoperative counselling (OR:3.078 95% CI:1.17-8.098, P = .02) were associated with preserved ability to orgasm. Libido was influenced by partner interest (OR 11.7, 95% CI:3.793-6.14, P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction after radical cystoprostatectomy is prevalent with many contributing factors. As such, establishing appropriate expectations and goals during preoperative counseling, performing neurovascular preservation when appropriate, and readily identifying and treating dysfunction in follow-up may improve sexual recovery.
Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/psicología , Disfunción Eréctil/fisiopatología , Prostatectomía/psicología , Conducta Sexual , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Vasos Sanguíneos , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/psicología , Humanos , Libido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano , Orgasmo , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Erección Peniana , Nervios Periféricos/cirugía , Periodo Posoperatorio , Periodo Preoperatorio , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Consejo Sexual , Parejas Sexuales/psicología , Derivación Urinaria/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the impact of giant prostate volume (PV) on outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) is controversial with a lack of evidence on the impact of PV on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed to assess the impact of giant PV on HRQOL and functional outcomes for men with prostate cancer (PC) undergoing RP. METHODS: Giant PV was defined based on the 95th percentile of PV measured by specimen weight of 3929 patients that underwent RP between 2013 and 2018 in a large tertiary care center. A propensity score-matched analysis of 929 men treated with RP for PC (n = 184 with PV ≥ 100 cm3 , n = 745 with PV < 100 cm3 ) was conducted. Primary endpoint was the impact of giant PV on HRQOL (based on EORTC QLQ-C30) assessed with binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model. Secondary endpoint was the impact of PV on oncological- and functional outcome. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24 months. Median PV, measured by specimen-weight, was 58 cm3 . We found no significant differences in median general HRQOL (p = .183), giant PV was not associated with better HRQOL (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-2.47; p = .075). No significant differences were found regarding continence recovery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.956; 95% CI, 0.771-1.185; p = .682), median International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire-Short-Form (ICIQ-SF) scores (p = .062) or potency rates (p = .151). Giant PV did not significantly impair biochemical recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.968; 95% CI, 0.651-1.439; p = .871). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing RP, giant PV was not associated with adverse HRQOL outcomes. We found no significant impact of PV on continence rates, potency rates, and biochemical recurrence-free survival. Hence, RP is an efficient cancer treatment for men even with giant PV.
Asunto(s)
Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer form in Sweden and side effects of the leading treatment, radical prostatectomy, include urinary leakage and erectile dysfunction. Patients are recommended to perform self-care to reduce side effects, but their experiences of performing self-care management after radical prostatectomy are largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to deepen the understanding about patient experiences of support for managing self-care during the first six months after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Eighteen patients were consecutively recruited six months after surgery and individual interviews were conducted. The study had a descriptive qualitative approach and inductive content analysis was used. RESULTS: Patients described self-care management during the first half-year after surgery as a progression with growth in self-management skills through interconnected phases, from initially striving to get a grasp of the situation and find supportive relationships, to getting grounded in the new situation and taking command of the situation. At six months after surgery, patients had reached a point where they needed to maneuver feelings about long-term consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized routines ensure a certain level of care, but are sparsely adjustable to patients' progression in self-care management. For sustained self-care behaviors, tailored and interactive support is required from multiple disciplines and peers, in order for a patient to get grounded in and take command of the situation.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/psicología , Cuidados Posteriores/normas , Prostatectomía/psicología , Autocuidado/psicología , Autocuidado/normas , Anciano , Emociones , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/psicología , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Investigación Cualitativa , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Grupos de Autoayuda/organización & administración , Apoyo Social , Suecia , Factores de Tiempo , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/psicologíaRESUMEN
Robust data evaluating the association of preoperative parameters of the patients with quality of life after radical prostatectomy are lacking. We investigated whether clinical and biological preoperative characteristics of the patients were associated with impaired patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and sexual outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes among the 1343 men participating in the AndroCan trial (NCT02235142). QoL and erectile dysfunction (ED) were assessed before and 1 year after radical prostatectomy using validated self-assessment questionnaires (Aging Male's Symptoms [AMS] and the 5-item abridged version of the International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF5]). At baseline, 1194 patients (88.9%) accepted to participate. A total of 750 (55.8%) patients answered the 1-year postoperative questionnaires. Out of them, only 378 (50.4% of responders) provided answers that could be used for calculations. One year after prostatectomy, ED had worsened by 8.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3-8.7; P < 0.0001) out of a maximum of 20. The global AMS score has worsened by 2.8 (95% CI: 1.7-3.8; P < 0.0001). ED scores 1 year postsurgery were positively correlated with preoperative age and percentage of fat mass, and negatively correlated with total cholesterol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and androstenediol (D5); AMS were poorly correlated with preoperative parameters. QoL and sexual symptoms significantly worsened after radical prostatectomy. Baseline bioavailable testosterone levels were significantly correlated with smaller changes on AMS somatic subscores postprostatectomy. These findings may be used to inform patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Andrógenos/farmacocinética , Síndrome Metabólico/complicaciones , Satisfacción del Paciente , Prostatectomía/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Andrógenos/farmacología , Estudios de Cohortes , Disfunción Eréctil , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Existing research indicates that physical activity (PA) is beneficial to men with prostate cancer (PCa). We examined the potential of a single-contact peer-support-based behavioural intervention to promote PA engagement in men treated for PCa. METHODS: A mixed methods design was employed, comprising a two-arm pragmatic trial and semi-structured interviews. The intervention was a 10-min PA-based presentation by a former patient, delivered in group seminars that are provided for patients as standard care. Seminars were alternately allocated to (a) cancer exercise specialist talk + patient speaker talk or (b) cancer exercise specialist talk only. Self-reported PA, exercise motivation, quality of life, fatigue and clinical and demographic characteristics were obtained from n = 148 (intervention: n = 69; control: n = 79) patients immediately prior to the seminar, and at follow-up ≈ 100 days later. Data were analysed using ANCOVA models and χ2 tests. Fourteen semi-structured interviews with intervention participants, which explored how the intervention was experienced, were analysed using a grounded theory-style approach. RESULTS: The intervention had no significant effect on quantitatively self-reported PA (p = 0.4). However, the intervention was statistically and clinically beneficial for fatigue (p = 0.04) and quality of life (p = 0.01). Qualitative analysis showed that the intervention was beneficial to psychological wellbeing and some participants had increased intention to engage in PA as a result of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A brief one-off PA-based presentation for men with PCa, delivered by a former patient alongside cancer exercise specialist advice, may result in clinically significant benefits to quality of life and may influence PA intention in certain individuals.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Apoyo Social , Terapia Conductista , Consejo , Fatiga/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Grupo Paritario , Proyectos Piloto , AutoinformeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess treatment satisfaction and decision regret post robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and correlate these with clinical, demographic and quality of life indicators. Our study took place at a high-volume United Kingdom center and patients were assessed at a minimum of 18 months postsurgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent RARP between June 2011 and May 2016 were invited to participate through mailed questionnaires. A total of 207 patients formed our cohort. The questionnaires included European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Cancer patients 30 and PR25 modules, sexual health inventory in men and Likert decisional regret scale. A Decisional Regret Scale score of >15 was used to define an outcome of high decision regret. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 63 years and the mean duration of follow up was 36 months. Of the 106 responders, 51 (48%) were fully satisfied with the decision to undergo RARP and 32 (30%) recorded high regret. The mean Decisional Regret Scale score was 11.3. High decision regret associated with the length of time from RARP to questionnaire administration, higher prostate specific quality of life symptom scores and lower sexual and erectile function scores. CONCLUSION: Our study represents the first contemporary United Kingdom series assessing decision regret following the management of localised prostate cancer with RARP. Higher regret was seen in one third of patients and was associated with worse disease-specific quality of life, sexual and erectile function measures. To minimize regret, collaborative and detailed discussion should take place pre-operatively when counselling patients about RARP. The potential longevity and impact on quality of life of these side effects should be made clear.
Asunto(s)
Emociones , Disfunción Eréctil/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Toma de Decisiones , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/patología , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Sexual , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The personality trait of neuroticism represents vulnerability for mental distress to somatic health problems. There are few studies of neuroticism in prostate cancer patients. This study examines the levels of self-reported adverse effects (AEs) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) in Norwegian men with high or low levels of neuroticism. Neuroticism is also compared to relevant factors concerning their associations with various AEs. METHODS: Among 982 men who had RALP at Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet between 2005 and 2010, 79% responded to a mailed questionnaire in 2011. They rated AEs by completing the EPIC-26 questionnaire, and neuroticism on the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). Men with < 1 year's follow-up, treatment failure, and incomplete EPQ responses were omitted, leaving 524 men for analysis. The EPQ responses were dichotomized into low and high level of neuroticism. Stepwise multivariate linear regression analyses were used for examination of associations with the EPIC-26 domain scores. RESULTS: High neuroticism was reported by 20% (95% CI 17-23%) of the patients. On the EPIC-26 dimensions men with high neuroticism had significantly lower mean scores than men with low neuroticism. Most of these between-group differences were clinically significant. In multivariate regression analyses, high neuroticism contributed significantly to all EPIC-26 domains. CONCLUSION: Increased levels of AEs after RALP are significantly associated with high neuroticism. A short screening test should be added to the current EPIC-26 instrument to identify patients with high neuroticism. In these patients, pre-operative counseling should take into account their risk of increased AE experiences.
Asunto(s)
Neuroticismo , Prostatectomía/psicología , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Pruebas PsicológicasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The decline of health-related quality-of-life (QOL) during the year after radical prostatectomy is severe. General self-efficacy (GSE) is an effective psychological factor for long-term regulation of patient behavior and emotions. GSE is expected to facilitate enhanced health-related quality of life. We evaluated changes in GSE and analyzed the relationship between GSE and prostate cancer-specific and general health-related QOL. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal survey with 104 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and administered the General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES), Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and SF8 Health Survey (SF-8). ANCOVA was performed to compare EPIC and SF-8 between GSES high and low-medium groups. RESULTS: GSES scores increased significantly after 6 months. Regarding EPIC urinary summary scores, high GSES group was significantly higher than low-medium group at 1 month (mean score difference [MSD], 7.3; 95% CI 1.1-13.2, P = 0.016), 3 months (MSD, 6.8; 95% CI 0.7-12.8, P = 0.028), and 6 months (MSD, 6.3; 95% CI 0.9-11.7, P = 0.022). High GSES group had significantly higher SF-8 physical component summary score at 6 months (MSD, 3.2; 95% CI 1.4-5.0, P = 0.001), and significantly higher SF-8 mental component summary score at 1 month (MSD, 2.6; 95% CI 0.4-4.9, P = 0.022), 3 months (MSD, 2.7; 95% CI 0.8-4.6, P = 0.007), and 6 months (MSD, 2.8; 95% CI 1.0-4.6, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that high GSE was associated with better prostate cancer-specific and general health-related QOL after radical prostatectomy.
Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Autoeficacia , Anciano , Humanos , Japón , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicologíaRESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate the effect of intrusive thoughts at diagnosis on quality of life, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety up to two years after radical prostatectomy.Method: The Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) trial was a prospective, longitudinal multicenter study of 4003 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Questionnaire data were collected preoperatively, at 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery.Results: The group of patients with intrusive thoughts at diagnosis had a statistically significant higher postoperative prevalence of impaired quality of life, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety as compared with the group of patients with no or minor intrusive thoughts. The highest risk increase for impaired QoL, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety ≥1/week was at 12, 3 and 3 months, respectively, where the three outcomes increased by 38% (RR: 1.38; 95%CI: 1.27-1.49)), 136% (RR: 2.36; 95%CI: 1.74-3.19)) and 165% (RR: 2.65; 95%CI: 2.22-3.17)), respectively.Conclusions: The demonstrated link between intrusive thoughts and quality of life, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety deliver is further evidence to the idea that intrusive thoughts has potential as an endpoint for assessing and predicting psychological distress among men with prostate cancer diagnosis.Trial registration number: ISRCTN06393679 (www.isrctn.com). Date of registration: 07/02/2008. Retrospectively registered.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/etiología , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Depresión/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Prostatectomía/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Pensamiento , Anciano , Predicción , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sueño , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Work ability represents a person's subjective assessment of current ability to work compared to his lifetime best. Since many men with prostate cancer are retired, work ability represents a more relevant work measure than employment status. The primary aim was to examine the prevalence of men who had high versus moderate/poor current work ability compared to their lifetime best work ability at a mean of 3.0 years after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. The secondary aim was to study variables associated with moderate/poor work ability at survey. METHODS: This is a questionnaire-based study of men who had robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy at Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet between January 2005 and August 2010. Among them 777 responded (79%), 730 reported on current work ability, socio-demographic data, somatic and mental health, and typical adverse effects (the EPIC-26) after prostatectomy. High versus moderate/poor work ability was the primary outcome. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample at survey was 65.5 years (SD 5.9). At survey 42% of the sample reported moderate/poor current work ability and 58% reported high work ability. In multivariable analysis older age at survey, low basic education, comorbidity, poor self-rated health, presence of depression and low EPIC-26 hormonal domain score remained significantly associated with moderate/poor work ability. CONCLUSIONS: Current work ability is a useful measure for the working capacity particularly of retired men. Socio-demographic, cancer-related, health, psychological and typical adverse effect variables were significantly associated with moderate/poor current work ability after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, and several health and psychological variables are amenable to identification and treatment by health care providers.
Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatments provide high survival rates, with patients often surviving a decade or longer after treatment. Therefore, treatment options are progressively based on quality of life. The objective of this research was to investigate magnitude of response shift (RS) in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) responses in men with clinically localized PCa using a generic questionnaire and a disease-specific questionnaire in an observational longitudinal patient registry study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort study was conducted using the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) database. Patients were annually surveyed using the Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) HRQOL measures. A total of 3161 active patients were eligible for a one-off supplemental study asking retrospective HRQOL scores (then-test). We calculated RS, observed change, and RS adjusted change. Statistical difference was determined by t test. RESULTS: Patients consistently reported higher recalled pretreatment HRQOL compared to baseline scores for SF-36 and PCI, confirming the existence of a RS (P < .05). On average, PCI demonstrated larger RS by a factor of 2 than SF-36. More specific, RS was greater especially in SF-36 physical domains compared to mental health items. PCI measured PCa-specific physical adverse effects only. Patients whose cancer had recurred reported slightly lower SF-36 RS than those whose cancer had not recurred. CONCLUSION: RS occurrence was measured in both the disease-specific questionnaire and the generic HRQOL questionnaire, demonstrating continued low health and symptom scores after RS adjustment. Therefore, health professionals should adjust for this phenomenon when assessing patient's HRQOL treatment responses, and clinicians should address their continued sexual and urinary functional loss.