Expression patterns of mismatch repair proteins in cervical cancer uncover independent prognostic value of MSH-2.

OBJECTIVE: Although early-detected cervical cancer is associated with good survival, the prognosis for late-stage disease is poor and treatment options are sparse. Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) has surfaced as a predictor of prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor(s) in several cancer types, but its value in cervical cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to define the prevalence of MMR-D in cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of MMR protein expression. METHODS: Expression of the MMR proteins MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, and MSH-6 was investigated by immunohistochemical staining in a prospectively collected cervical cancer cohort (n=508) with corresponding clinicopathological and follow-up data. Sections were scored as either loss or intact expression to define MMR-D, and by a staining index, based on staining intensity and area, evaluating the prognostic potential. RNA and whole exome sequencing data were available for 72 and 75 of the patients and were used for gene set enrichment and mutational analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Five (1%) tumors were MMR-deficient, three of which were of neuroendocrine histology. MMR status did not predict survival (HR 1.93, p=0.17). MSH-2 low (n=48) was associated with poor survival (HR 1.94, p=0.02), also when adjusting for tumor stage, tumor type, and patient age (HR 2.06, p=0.013). MSH-2 low tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p=0.003) and higher frequency of (frameshift) mutations in the double-strand break repair gene RAD50 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: MMR-D is rare in cervical cancer, yet low MSH-2 expression is an independent predictor of poor survival.

MLH1, MSH2, MRE11, and XRCC1 in Oral Leukoplakia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: DNA damage is accumulated in the cells over time as the result of both exogenous and endogenous factors. The objective of this study was to analyze the immunohistochemical expression of the repair proteins in oral leukoplakia (OL) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paraffin blocks were selected from the archives of the Laboratory of Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Spain. The sample was composed of 16 cases of OL without dysplasia, 14 cases of OL with dysplasia, and 15 cases of OSCC. The patients' clinical data were collected and immunohistochemical analysis was performed for MLH1, MSH2, MRE11, and XRCC1. The data were submitted to the χ2 and the Kruskal-Wallis (P≤0.05) tests. RESULTS: MSH2 was overexpressed in OSCC (P=0.020) and was positive in 100% of patients with OL with dysplasia or OSCC (P=0.019). Positivity for MLH1 was significantly associated with comorbidity (P=0.040), especially in patients who presented with 2 or more pathologies (P=0.028). XRCC1 positivity was also associated with comorbidity (P=0.039). No significant associations were found for the MRE11A expression. Although the simultaneous positivity for the 4 markers was observed in presence of comorbidities (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the effect of the overexpression of MSH2 protein in samples of OL with dysplasia and OSCC, most notably in patients who present with comorbidities and negativity for OL without dysplasia.

Clinicopathological and survival characteristic of mismatch repair status in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore the expression of mismatch repair (MMR) status and its correlation with clinicopathologic and survival characteristics in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). METHODS: Expression of four MMR proteins (MLH1, PMS, MSH2, and MSH6) were measured using tissue microarray-based immunohistochemistry in 120 OCCC patients. The associations of clinicopathologic parameters with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analysis was further performed by the Cox regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 120 OCCC patients met the entry criteria, and their MMR status was detected, consisting of 24 patients with dMMR and 96 patients with proficient MMR (pMMR). Patients with dMMR were strongly associated with platinum-sensitive disease (P = .006) and large tumor volume (P = .038). Among all the patients who have received surgery, tumors with dMMR had a better RFS and OS than those with pMMR (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence: 0.459 [95% confidence interval {95% CI} = 0.224-0.940], P = .029; HR for death: 0.381 [95% CI = 0.170-0.853], P = .015). In subgroup analysis, dMMR patients experienced a better trend of RFS (HR = 0.273; P = .055) and OS (HR = 0.165; P = .040) than pMMR cases among early stages (I-II), but this difference was not observed in advanced stage (III-IV) patients. Meanwhile, pMMR was associated with a more favorable trend of prognosis than dMMR in platinum-resistant patients (RFS: HR = 0.317, P = .051; OS: HR = 0.370, P = .046). Multivariate analysis revealed that only advanced stages (III-IV) were adverse independent prognosticators for both RFS (HR = 5.938 [95% CI = 2.804-12.574]; P < .001) and OS (HR = 6.209 [95% CI = 2.724-14.156]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Tumors with dMMR were related to better OS in OCCC on univariate analysis. Only the tumor stage was an independent prognosticator for both RFS and OS. MMR status is a potentially valuable prognostic index in OCCC patients, and larger prospective studies are required to validate its prognostic role.

Loss of DNA mismatch repair proteins in prostate cancer.

Recent studies have suggested an increased risk of prostate cancer in men with Lynch syndrome driven by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. However, the incidence and clinical implication of MMR deficiency in sporadic prostate cancers remain poorly understood. We immunohistochemically stained for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a set of tissue microarray consisting of 220 radical prostatectomy specimens and evaluated the relationship between loss of their expression and available clinicopathological features. MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were lost in 2 (0.9%), 6 (2.7%), 37 (16.8%), and 27 (12.3%) prostate cancers, respectively. Loss of at least 1 MMR protein was identified in 50 (22.7%) cases. There were no statistically significant associations between MMR deficiency and patient age, family history of prostate cancer, Gleason score, or pT/pN stage. Nonetheless, the levels of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were significantly (P = .015) higher in patients with MMR deficiency (mean ±â€ŠSD: 9.12 ±â€Š9.01 ng/mL) than in those without abnormal MMR (5.76 ±â€Š3.17 ng/mL). There were 15 (6.8%) cases showing loss of at least 2 MMR proteins, which was not significantly associated with PSA level or tumor grade/stage. Additionally, 5 and 2 cases showed losses of at least 3 MMR proteins and all 4 proteins, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant associations between loss of MLH1 (P = .373), MSH2 (P = .348), MSH6 (P = .946), or PMS2 (P = .681), or at least 1 (P = .477), 2 (P = .486), or 3 (P = .352) MMR proteins and biochemical recurrence. Further analyses of the data on programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression previously stained in the same set of tissue microarray demonstrated associations between loss of ≥2 MMR proteins and a higher rate of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells (17.2% vs 5.2%; P = .033) as well as between cases showing both loss of ≥1 MMR protein(s) and PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells vs a higher risk of biochemical recurrence (P = .045). MMR protein loss was seen in a subset of prostate cancers. Interestingly, it was associated with significantly higher levels of PSA. Moreover, immunohistochemical detection of MMR proteins together with other proteins, such as PD-L1, might be helpful in predicting tumor recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Frequent CTNNB1 or PIK3CA Mutations Occurred in Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma With High Levels of Microsatellite Instability and Loss of MSH2/MSH6 Expression.

BACKGROUND: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins form 2 heterodimers-MutSα formed by MSH2 and MSH6, and MutLα by MLH1 and PMS2. In endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas, cases with MMR protein defect also usually harbor other recurrent genetic mutations of the neoplasm. However, it remains unknown whether defects of the 2 functionally different heterodimers are linked to mutations in different genes. We aimed to study the MMR protein expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), and other common genetic mutations of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the MSI status of 107 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients. MMR protein expression, and mutation of KRAS, CTNNB1, and PIK3CA were also evaluated by immunohistochemistry and sequencing. RESULTS: An overall 34.6% (37/107) of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas were MSI-H. All MSI-H tumors exhibited loss of MMR protein expression (loss of MLH1, PMS2, MSH6, and MSH2 was noted in 22, 25, 12, and 7 cases, respectively). CTNNB1, PIK3CA, and KRAS mutation were present in 9, 7, and 7 MSI-H tumors. Compared with patients with loss of PMS2 and/or MLH1 expression, patients with loss of MSH6 and/or MSH2 expression were associated with higher frequencies of CTNNB1 mutation (P=0.036) and PIK3CA mutation (P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In MSI-H endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas, different types of MMR protein deficiency indicate different molecular genetic alterations.

Incidence of Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency and Associated Clinicopathologic Features in a Cohort of 104 Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinomas.

Patients with Lynch syndrome have up to a 24% risk of developing ovarian carcinoma, but universal mismatch repair (MMR) protein testing of ovarian carcinomas is not standard practice in most institutions. We reviewed 104 unselected ovarian endometrioid carcinomas (OEC) for various clinicopathologic features to determine if any are predictive of MMR loss. Immunohistochemistry for all 4 MMR proteins was performed followed by MLH1 promoter methylation analysis when indicated. Overall, patients had a mean age of 55 years and tumors averaged 12 cm. Most (72%) patients had stage I tumors, 63% were grade 1, and 30% had a synchronous stage IA endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Peritumoral lymphocytes and intratumoral stromal inflammation were rare, but tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes averaged 47/10 high-power fields. Endometriosis was noted in 71%, adenofibromatous background in 14%, and both in 14% of tumors. Metaplastic changes were common and included squamous metaplasia (63%), clear cell change (32%), mucinous differentiation (24%), and sex cord-like elements (13%). When follow-up was available (n=99), 78% of patients were alive and well, 12% died from disease, 6% died from other causes, and 4% were alive with disease. Unmethylated, MMR-deficient OECs were identified in 7% of the cohort and included MSH2/MSH6 (n=4), MSH6 (n=2), and PMS2 (n=1). All these tumors were stage I, 71% grade 1, and 57% had a synchronous endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Among patients in this group with follow-up (n=5), all were alive without evidence of disease (mean 150 mo). Given that no clinicopathologic features were associated with MMR deficiency on univariate analysis, this study highlights the importance of universal MMR screening in OECs.

Endometrial Cancer Presentation and Outcomes Based on Mismatch Repair Protein Expression From a Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: There is uncertainty about the prognostic significance of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in endometrial cancer. The objective was to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes of endometrial cancers based on MMR status within a population-based study. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all endometrial cancer cases from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority region, evaluated for 4 MMR proteins using immunohistochemistry from 2012 to 2015. Patients were classified as MMR deficient (dMMR, any MMR protein absent) or MMR proficient (pMMR), Demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrences, and survival rates were compared according to MMR status. RESULTS: There were 892 patients, with 650 pMMR (72.5%) and 242 dMMR tumors. The dMMR group had more endometrioid tumors (87.6% vs 74.0%, P < 0.001), lymphovascular space invasion (43.8% vs 30.8%, P = 0.001), and dedifferentiation (5.9% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001), but fewer grade 1 tumors compared with the pMMR group (31.8% vs 40.8%, P < 0.001). Median progression-free survival and overall survival have not been reached. After a median follow-up of 31 months (1-99 months), there was no difference in progression or recurrence rates between pMMR and dMMR tumors (19.5% vs 16.5%; P = 0.31). However, among those with nonendometrioid tumors, recurrence and mortality rates were significantly higher for pMMR than dMMR tumors (42.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.001, and 36.1% vs 13.1%, P = 0.01, respectively), despite similar stage and lymphovascular space invasion distributions. DISCUSSION: In this population-based study, there were no significant differences in recurrence or survival outcomes according to MMR status in endometrial cancer. However, among those with nonendometrioid tumors, there were lower recurrence and mortality rates associated with MMR-deficient compared with MMR-proficient tumors.

Expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins in ameloblastomas and tooth germs.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair proteins (MMRPs) are a group of nuclear enzymes that participate in the repair of base mismatches that occur during DNA replication in all proliferating cells. The most studied MMRPs are hMSH2 and hMLH1, which are known to be highly expressed in normal tissues. A loss of MMRPs leads to the accumulation of DNA replication errors in proliferating cells. Ki-67 is a biomarker regarded to be the gold-standard tool for determining cell proliferation by immunohistochemical methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of hMLH1, hMSH2 and Ki-67 proteins in ameloblastomas and tooth germs, to contribute to the understanding of the development of this odontogenic neoplasm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical assays to determine the presence of proteins hMSH2, hMLH1 and Ki-67 were performed in 80 ameloblastomas (40 solid and 40 unicystic) and five tooth germs. RESULTS: Unicystic ameloblastomas showed higher MMRP expression (hMLH1: 62.5 ± 43.4; hMSH2: 83.3 ± 47.8) than did solid ameloblastomas (hMLH1: 59.4 ± 13.5; hMSH2: 75.8 ± 40.2). Additionally, the cell proliferation index assessed by Ki-67 was inversely proportional to the expression of MMRP. Comparison between tooth germs and ameloblastoma revealed significantly higher expression of hMLH1, hMSH2 and Ki-67 in tooth germs (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The differences of MMRP and Ki-67 immunoexpression between ameloblastomas and tooth germ suggest that alterations in the MMRP mechanisms could participate in the biological behavior of ameloblastomas.

Altered expression of HER-2 and the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 predicts the outcome of T1 high-grade bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: The identification of factors predicting the outcome of stage T1 high-grade bladder cancer (BC) is a major clinical issue. METHODS: We performed immunohistochemistry to assess the role of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) and microsatellite instability (MSI) factors MutL homologue 1 (MLH1) and MutS homologue 2 (MSH2) in predicting recurrence and progression of T1 high-grade BCs having undergone transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) alone or TURBT + intravesical instillations of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). RESULTS: HER-2 overexpression was a significant predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) in the overall as well as in the two patients' population; as for progression-free survival (PFS), it was significant in the overall but not in the two patients' population. MLH1 was an independent predictor of PFS only in patients treated with BCG and MSH2 failed to predict DFS and PFS in all populations. Most importantly, the higher the number of altered markers the lowers the DFS and PFS. In multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, the number of altered molecular markers and BCG treatment were significant predictors (p = 0.0004 and 0.0283, respectively) of DFS, whereas the number of altered molecular markers was the only significant predictor (p = 0.0054) of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Altered expression of the proto-oncogene HER-2 and the two molecular markers of genetic instability MLH1 and MSH2 predicted T1 high-grade BC outcome with the higher the number of altered markers the lower the DFS and PFS. These findings provide grounds for further testing them in predicting the outcome of this challenging disease.

Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression Among 700 Consecutive Endometrial Cancers: Strong Association With Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the prevalence of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and determine clinical and pathological associations. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 was performed on sections of a triple-core tissue microarray of 700 ECs. Positive PD-L1 expression, defined as 1% of cells staining positive, was evaluated in tumor and stromal compartments. Using age-adjusted logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between PD-L1 expression (overall and by staining compartment) with clinical and tumor characteristics. Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests were used to evaluate associations between PD-L1 expression and EC-specific survival. RESULTS: PD-L1 expression was observed in 100 cases (14.3%), including 27 (3.9%) with expression in tumor cells only, 35 (5.0%) with expression in both tumor cells and stroma, and 38 (5.4%) with expression in stroma only. Expression was observed in ECs of different histologic types. Tumors characterized by loss of mismatch repair proteins were significantly associated with tumoral PD-L1 expression (P < 0.0001), but not with stromal PD-L1 expression. Both tumoral and stromal PD-L1 expressions were associated with high-grade endometrioid histology, nonendometrioid histology, and lymphovascular space invasion. We observed no significant associations between PD-L1 expression and EC-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 is expressed in a significant proportion of EC and is associated with mismatch repair deficiency, potentially representing a mechanism of tumor immune evasion and a therapeutic target in EC.

Comparison between mononucleotide and dinucleotide marker panels in gastric cancer with loss of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression.

BACKGROUND: DNA mismatch repair deficiency is an important molecular mechanism of genetic instability in gastric cancer, and a high instability at microsatellites is associated with favorable prognosis. We compared mononucleotide and dinucleotide microsatellite instability (MSI) marker panels in 56 paired gastric tumor and normal samples. METHODS: The mononucleotide marker panel (mono panel) consisted of 8 markers: BAT25, BAT26, BAT40, BAT-RII, NR21, NR22, NR24 and NR27. The dinucleotide marker panel (di panel) contained D2S123, D5S346, D17S250, D17S261, D17S520, D18S34 and D18S58. The NCI panel was used as reference panel. RESULTS: Among 13 gastric tumors showing no hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression, 8 MSI-H (high) and 5 MSI-L (low) were identified. The analytical sensitivities of the NCI, mono and di panels to detect unstable MSI were 61.5% (8/13), 76.9% (10/13) and 84.6% (11/13), respectively. The size change of allele shift was statistically greater in the mono panel than in the di panel (p = 0.02 by Mann-Whitney U-test). The BAT40 (69.2%, 9/13) and D18S34 (76.9%, 10/13) markers showed high sensitivity for determination of MSI status. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the detection rate of MSI in gastric cancer with loss of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression, the kind of MSI marker may need to be considered more, instead of the repetitive type of marker. Thus, an MSI panel designed with a combination of both BAT40 and D18S34 is suggested for providing more accurate and sensitive MSI analysis in gastric cancer.

Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 has no impact on survival in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction but is associated with favourable clinicopathologic features.

BACKGROUND: COX-2 expression induces carcinogenesis and is thought to be an adverse prognostic factor in gastric carcinomas while the prognostic value of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is still controversial. Concerning adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction, no comprehensive data regarding either factors are available as of yet. OBJECTIVE: We assessed expression of COX-2, MLH1 and MSH2 in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in relation to patients' survival and various clinicopathologic features. DESIGN: Immunohistochemical studies (using antibodies against COX-2, MLH1 and MSH2) were performed in a study population of 228 tumours. Follow-up data was available for all patients with a mean follow-up time of 42.8 months. RESULTS: 78 (34.2%) tumours were COX-2 negative, 148 (64.9%) showed COX-2 positivity. Assessment of COX-2 expression and clinicopathologic features revealed an inverse correlation with depth of tumour invasion and number of metastatic lymph nodes (p=0,021 and p=0,004, respectively). No correlation with other features could be demonstrated. 62 cases (27.2%) showed loss of DNA repair enzymes MLH1 and/or MSH2. MMR differed significantly between COX-2 positive and negative cases (p=0,028). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses revealed no impact on patients' survival for COX-2 expression or MMR status (p=0.837 and p=0.972, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Expression of COX-2 in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction seems to have no prognostic effect or impact on patients' survival but is associated with favourable clinicopathologic factors. MMR deficiency was more frequent in COX-2 negative tumours, but MMR status had no impact on survival and patients' outcome whatsoever.

Cytoplasmic MSH2 immunoreactivity in a patient with Lynch syndrome with an EPCAM-MSH2 fusion.

AIMS: Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins is being increasingly used to examine MMR status in tumours. The aim of the present article was to report the case of a colon cancer patient with Lynch syndrome who showed unusual cytoplasmic MMR protein localization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Histologically, the colon cancer was diagnosed as medullary carcinoma associated with prominent tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and a Crohn's-like reaction. Immunohistochemistry revealed cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of MSH2 in non-neoplastic cells, and exclusively cytoplasmic expression in tumour cells. MSH6 expression was nuclear in non-neoplastic cells, but was lost in tumour cells. Nuclear expression of MLH1 and PMS2 was retained in both non-neoplastic and tumour cells. The tumour was microsatellite instability-high, which is indicative of defective MMR function. A subsequent germline mutation analysis identified a genomic deletion spanning the 3' region of EPCAM and the 5' region of MSH2, resulting in an in-frame fusion of EPCAM and MSH2. CONCLUSIONS: The unusual cytoplasmic immunoreactivity of MSH2 was considered to be attributable to the non-functional EPCAM-MSH2 fusion product. The present case illustrates that not only loss of expression, but also abnormal localization, of MMR proteins is indicative of a defective MMR system.

A specific mode of microsatellite instability is a crucial biomarker in adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma patients.

PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been a long-standing biomarker candidate for drug resistance in tumour cells. Despite numerous clinical studies, the data in the literature are not conclusive. The complexity of the MSI phenomenon in some malignancies may, at least partly, account for the discrepancy. In addition, methodological problems are also pointed out in the assay techniques. We previously established a unique fluorescent technique in which the major methodological problems in conventional assays are overcome. Application of this technique has revealed two distinct modes of microsatellite alterations, i.e. Type A and Type B. More importantly, we demonstrated that Type A MSI is the direct consequence of defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) that causes cellular resistance against antineoplastic agents. METHOD: We first applied this technique to adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma (ATLL). RESULTS: The MSI phenomenon was indeed observed in ATLLs (4/20, 20%). Intriguingly, the observed microsatellite alterations were invariably Type A, which implies that the tumours were MMR-defective. Indeed, clinical outcomes of patients with these MSI+ tumours were significantly worse. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that Type A MSI is an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: These observations strongly suggest the possibility of Type A MSI as a prognostic and potentially predictive biomarker in ATLL.

DNA Repair Gene Expression Levels as Indicators of Breast Cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

AIM: The expression level of DNA repair-related genes and their association with breast cancer status among participants of the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNA from mononuclear cells in 194 sister sets (n=475 women) were assayed for ATM, BRCA1, MSH2, MUTYH and XPC gene expression levels and analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE). RESULTS: Individuals with decreased ATM and MSH2 expression had significantly higher odds for breast cancer compared to individuals with higher levels of expression (odds ratio (OR)=1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.02, 1.18) and (OR=1.90, 95% CI=1.21, 2.97), respectively. Upon stratifying the GEE model, reductions in ATM and MSH2 expression levels was heightened among women with an extended family history (FH) of breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Reduced expression of ATM and MSH2 compromises DNA repair capacity and, thereby, increases breast cancer prevalence.

Overexpression of MutSα Complex Proteins Predicts Poor Prognosis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is responsible for the detection and correction of errors created during DNA replication, thereby avoiding the incorporation of mutations in dividing cells. The prognostic value of alterations in MMR system has not previously been analyzed in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).The study comprised 115 cases of OSCC diagnosed between 1996 and 2010. The specimens collected were constructed into tissue microarray blocks. Immunohistochemical staining for MutSα complex proteins hMSH2 and hMSH6 was performed. The slides were subsequently scanned into high-resolution images, and nuclear staining of hMSH2 and hMSH6 was analyzed using the Nuclear V9 algorithm. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed to evaluate the prognostic value of hMSH2 and hMSH6 in OSCC.All cases in the present cohort were positive for hMSH2 and hMSH6 and a direct correlation was found between the expression of the proteins (P < 0.05). The mean number of positive cells for hMSH2 and hMSH6 was 64.44 ±â€Š15.21 and 31.46 ±â€Š22.38, respectively. These values were used as cutoff points to determine high protein expression. Cases with high expression of both proteins simultaneously were classified as having high MutSα complex expression. In the multivariable analysis, high expression of the MutSα complex was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.75, P = 0.02).This study provides a first insight of the prognostic value of alterations in MMR system in OSCC. We found that MutSα complex may constitute a molecular marker for the poor prognosis of OSCC.

Chronic Oxidative Stress Increases Resistance to Doxorubicin-Induced Cytotoxicity in Renal Carcinoma Cells Potentially Through Epigenetic Mechanism.

Renal cell carcinoma is the most common form of kidney cancer and is highly resistant to chemotherapy. Although the role of oxidative stress in kidney cancer is known, the chemotherapeutic response of cancer cells adapted to chronic oxidative stress is not clear. Hence, the effect of oxidative stress on sensitivity to doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity was evaluated using an in vitro model of human kidney cancer cells adapted to chronic oxidative stress. Results of MTT- and anchorage-independent growth assays and cell cycle analysis revealed significant decrease in sensitivity to doxorubicin in Caki-1 cells adapted to oxidative stress. Changes in the expression of genes involved in drug transport, cell survival, and DNA repair-dependent apoptosis further confirmed increased resistance to doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in these cells. Decreased expression of mismatch repair (MMR) gene MSH2 in cells exposed to oxidative stress suggests that loss of MMR-dependent apoptosis could be a potential mechanism for increased resistance to doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity. Additionally, downregulation of HDAC1, an increase in the level of histone H3 acetylation, and hypermethylation of MSH2 promoter were also observed in Caki-1 cells adapted to chronic oxidative stress. DNA-demethylating agent 5-Aza-2dC significantly restored the expression of MSH2 and doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in Caki-1 cells adapted to chronic oxidative stress, suggesting the role of DNA hypermethylation in inactivation of MSH2 expression and consequently MMR-dependent apoptosis in these cells. In summary, this study for the first time provides direct evidence for the role of oxidative stress in chemotherapeutic resistance in renal carcinoma cells potentially through epigenetic mechanism.

Mismatch repair gene expression in gastroesophageal cancers.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mismatch repair (MMR) genes play a critical role in maintaining genomic stability, and the impairment of MMR machinery is associated with different human cancers, mainly colorectal cancer. The purpose of our study was to analyze gene expression patterns of three MMR genes (MSH2, MHS6, and EXO1) in gastroesophageal cancers, a pathology in which the contribution of DNA repair genes remains essentially unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 Romanian patients diagnosed with sporadic gastroesophageal cancers were included in this study. For each patient, MMR mRNA levels were measured in biopsied tumoral (T) and peritumoral (PT) tissues obtained by upper endoscopy. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) with specific TaqMan probes was used to measure gene expression levels for MSH2, MSH6, and EXO1 genes. RESULTS: A significant association was observed for the investigated MMR genes, all of which were detected to be upregulated in gastroesophageal tumor samples when compared with paired normal samples. In the stratified analysis, the association was limited to gastric adenocarcinoma samples. We found no statistically significant associations between MMR gene expression and tumor site or histological grade. CONCLUSION: In our study, MSH2, MSH6, and EXO1 genes were overexpressed in gastroesophageal cancers. Further investigations based on more samples are necessary to validate our findings.

Association between mismatch repair gene and irinotecan-based chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer.

Mismatch repair (MMR) gene is closely related to the pathogenesis of colon cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association between MMR status and efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy. As a target of 5-FU, thymidylate synthase (TS) expression level might be influenced by irinotecan. Understanding whether this influence of TS is related with MMR status is helpful to the further exploration of the mechanism of irinotecan sensitivity in metastatic colon cancer with different MMR status. One hundred eighty-four patients with metastatic colon cancer receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment were included. Correlations between MMR and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were determined. Two pairs of colon cancer cell lines (HCT-116-hMLH1(Vector) (deficient MMR, dMMR) versus HCT-116-hMLH1(+) (proficient MMR, pMMR); SW480-shRNA-hMLH1 (dMMR) versus SW480-shRNA-Control (pMMR)) were established by regulating MMR status. Sensitivity of these cell lines to irinotecan was determined by MTT assay. Regulation of TS by irinotecan was evaluated by western blotting and quantitative real-time PCR assay. dMMR accounted for 18.5 % and was related with proximal colon cancer (p = 0.005), poorly differentiated tumors (p = 0.018) and favorable efficacy with a higher disease control rate (DCR), a longer progression-free survival (PFS) and a trend of longer overall survival (OS). dMMR colon cancer cells were more sensitive to irinotecan. TS expression level was reduced more in dMMR cells after irinotecan treatment (p < 0.05). Our study favors an increased sensitivity of irinotecan in colon cancer with dMMR status. MMR status may be a predictive biomarker of response to irinotecan-based chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer.

Expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in recurrent glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVES: Methylated O6-methylguanin-DNA-methytransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is associated with survival in patients with glioblastoma. Current evidence suggests that further mismatch repair genes play a pivotal role in the tumor response to treatment. Candidate genes are MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. Formerly, we found evidence of prognostic impact of MLH1 and MSH6 immunohistochemical expression in a small series of patients with initial glioblastoma. METHODS: Two hundred and eleven patients were included who underwent macroscopically total removal of primary glioblastoma and at least one re-craniotomy for recurrence. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on paraffin-embedded specimens of initial tumors with specific antibodies against MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. RESULTS were compared to the Ki67 proliferation index and patient survival. Additionally, fresh frozen samples from 16 paired initial and recurrent specimens were examined using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with specific primers against MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. RESULTS were compared to MGMT status and survival. RESULTS: (1) Immunohistochemical expression of MSH6 was significantly associated with the Ki67 proliferation index (P<0.001) but not with survival. (2) PCR revealed two patients with increasing expression of MLH1, MLH2, and MSH6 over treatment combined with lacking MGMT methylation. In another two patients, decreased MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 expression was observed in combination with MGMT promoter methylation. DISCUSSION: Our data indicate that there may be glioblastoma patient subgroups characterized by MMR-expression changes beyond MGMT promoter methylation. The immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in initial glioblastoma is not associated with patient survival.