Therapeutic opportunities for PLK1 inhibitors: Spotlight on BRCA1-deficiency and triple negative breast cancers.

Polo-Like Kinases (PLKs) are central players of mitotic progression in Eukaryotes. Given the intimate relationship between cell cycle progression and cancer development, PLKs in general and PLK1 in particular have been thoroughly studied as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in oncology. The oncogenic properties of PLK1 overexpression across different types of human cancers are attributed to its roles in promoting mitotic entry, centrosome maturation, spindle assembly and cytokinesis. While several academic labs and pharmaceutical companies were able to develop potent and selective inhibitors of PLK1 (PLK1i) for preclinical research, such compounds have reached only limited success in clinical trials despite their great pharmacokinetics. Even though this could be attributed to multiple causes, the housekeeping roles of PLK1 in both normal and cancer cells are most likely the main reason for clinical trials failure and withdraw due to toxicities issues. Therefore, great efforts are being invested to position PLK1i in the treatment of specific types of cancers with revised dosages schemes. In this mini review we focus on two potential niches for PLK1i that are supported by recent evidence: triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) and BRCA1-deficient cancers. On the one hand, we recollect several lines of strong evidence indicating that TNBCs are among the cancers with highest PLK1 expression and sensitivity to PLK1i. These findings are encouraging because of the limited therapeutics options available for TNBC patients, which rely mainly on classic chemotherapy. On the other hand, we discuss recent evidence that unveils synthetic lethality induction by PLK1 inhibition in BRCA1-deficient cancers cells. This previously unforeseen therapeutic link between PLK1 and BRCA1 is promising because it defines novel therapeutic opportunities for PLK1i not only for breast cancer (i.e. TNBCs with BRCA1 deficiencies), but also for other types of cancers with BRCA1-deficiencies, such as pancreatic and prostate cancers.

Polo-like Kinase 1 Inhibition as a Therapeutic Approach to Selectively Target BRCA1-Deficient Cancer Cells by Synthetic Lethality Induction.

PURPOSE: BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiencies are widespread drivers of human cancers that await the development of targeted therapies. We aimed to identify novel synthetic lethal relationships with therapeutic potential using BRCA-deficient isogenic backgrounds. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We developed a phenotypic screening technology to simultaneously search for synthetic lethal (SL) interactions in BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient contexts. For validation, we developed chimeric spheroids and a dual-tumor xenograft model that allowed the confirmation of SL induction with the concomitant evaluation of undesired cytotoxicity on BRCA-proficient cells. To extend our results using clinical data, we performed retrospective analysis on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer database. RESULTS: The screening of a kinase inhibitors library revealed that Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) inhibition triggers strong SL induction in BRCA1-deficient cells. Mechanistically, we found no connection between the SL induced by PLK1 inhibition and PARP inhibitors. Instead, we uncovered that BRCA1 downregulation and PLK1 inhibition lead to aberrant mitotic phenotypes with altered centrosomal duplication and cytokinesis, which severely reduced the clonogenic potential of these cells. The penetrance of PLK1/BRCA1 SL interaction was validated using several isogenic and nonisogenic cellular models, chimeric spheroids, and mice xenografts. Moreover, bioinformatic analysis revealed high-PLK1 expression in BRCA1-deficient tumors, a phenotype that was consistently recapitulated by inducing BRCA1 deficiency in multiple cell lines as well as in BRCA1-mutant cells. CONCLUSIONS: We uncovered an unforeseen addiction of BRCA1-deficient cancer cells to PLK1 expression, which provides a new means to exploit the therapeutic potential of PLK1 inhibitors in clinical trials, by generating stratification schemes that consider this molecular trait in patient cohorts.

A novel method to detect the Mexican founder mutation BRCA1 ex9­12del associated with breast and ovarian cancer using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and TaqMan® probes.

In 2015, according to the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), malignant breast tumors were the first cause of cancer fatality in women (6,273 fatalities) in Mexico, whereas 2,793 fatalities in women were due to ovarian cancer. A total of 5­10% of breast cancer and 10­15% of ovarian cancer cases are caused by a hereditary breast­ovarian cancer syndrome, with mutations predominantly identified in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Recently, the Mexican founder mutation BRCA1 ex9­12del was identified (deletion of exons 9­12 with recombination between introns 8­12). This is the most frequently reported mutation in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Mexico. Current detection methods include end­point polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Multiplex Ligation­dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). In the present study a cheap, sensitive and fast detection method was developed based on quantitative PCR and two TaqMan® probes, one to detect the deletion (recombination region between introns 8 and 12), and the other one a region from exon 11. With this assay, 90 samples were able to be analyzed in 2 h using 2.5 ng of DNA/reaction at a cost of ~2­3 USD. This method is capable of detecting positive samples for DNA deletion and excluding negative ones. Therefore, the method proposed may be a useful high­throughput diagnostic option that could be useful in future association or prevalence studies that use large populations.

miR-146a and miR-638 in BRCA1-deficient triple negative breast cancer tumors, as potential biomarkers for improved overall survival.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms that lead to the reduced expression of BRCA1 in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors are not fully understood. A possible cause is overexpression of miR-146a and miR-638, which regulate BRCA1 expression in other cancers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the expression of these microRNAs in relation to BRCA1 expression in TNBC tumors. METHODS: Expression of both microRNAs was assessed by real time qPCR using Taqman microRNA assays in TNBC tumors. Results were related to protein expression of BRCA1 and patient's survival. RESULTS: miR-146a and miR-638 were overexpressed in 36% and 59% of TNBC tumors, respectively. Overexpression was preeminent in BRCA1-deficient tumors and significantly associated to a better overall survival. CONCLUSION: Both miRNAs are potential biomarkers for improved overall survival in patients with BRCA1-deficient TNBC tumors.