Structure and the Mode of Activity of Lon Proteases from Diverse Organisms.

Lon proteases, members of the AAA+ superfamily of enzymes, are key components of the protein quality control system in bacterial cells, as well as in the mitochondria and other specialized organelles of higher organisms. These enzymes have been subject of extensive biochemical and structural investigations, resulting in 72 crystal and solution structures, including structures of the individual domains, multi-domain constructs, and full-length proteins. However, interpretation of the latter structures still leaves some questions unanswered. Based on their amino acid sequence and details of their structure, Lon proteases can be divided into at least three subfamilies, designated as LonA, LonB, and LonC. Protomers of all Lons are single-chain polypeptides and contain two functional domains, ATPase and protease. The LonA enzymes additionally include a large N-terminal region, and different Lons may also include non-conserved inserts in the principal domains. These ATP-dependent proteases function as homohexamers, in which unfolded substrates are translocated to a large central chamber where they undergo proteolysis by a processive mechanism. X-ray crystal structures provided high-resolution models which verified that Lons are hydrolases with the rare Ser-Lys catalytic dyad. Full-length LonA enzymes have been investigated by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), providing description of the functional enzyme at different stages of the catalytic cycle, indicating extensive flexibility of their N-terminal domains, and revealing insights into the substrate translocation mechanism. Structural studies of Lon proteases provide an interesting case for symbiosis of X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM, currently the two principal techniques for determination of macromolecular structures.

A Lon-like protease with no ATP-powered unfolding activity.

Lon proteases are a family of ATP-dependent proteases involved in protein quality control, with a unique proteolytic domain and an AAA(+) (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) module accommodated within a single polypeptide chain. They were classified into two types as either the ubiquitous soluble LonA or membrane-inserted archaeal LonB. In addition to the energy-dependent forms, a number of medically and ecologically important groups of bacteria encode a third type of Lon-like proteins in which the conserved proteolytic domain is fused to a large N-terminal fragment lacking canonical AAA(+) motifs. Here we showed that these Lon-like proteases formed a clade distinct from LonA and LonB. Characterization of one such Lon-like protease from Meiothermus taiwanensis indicated that it formed a hexameric assembly with a hollow chamber similar to LonA/B. The enzyme was devoid of ATPase activity but retained an ability to bind symmetrically six nucleotides per hexamer; accordingly, structure-based alignment suggested possible existence of a non-functional AAA-like domain. The enzyme degraded unstructured or unfolded protein and peptide substrates, but not well-folded proteins, in ATP-independent manner. These results highlight a new type of Lon proteases that may be involved in breakdown of excessive damage or unfolded proteins during stress conditions without consumption of energy.

The active site of a lon protease from Methanococcus jannaschii distinctly differs from the canonical catalytic Dyad of Lon proteases.

ATP-dependent Lon proteases catalyze the degradation of various regulatory proteins and abnormal proteins within cells. Methanococcus jannaschii Lon (Mj-Lon) is a homologue of Escherichia coli Lon (Ec-Lon) but has two transmembrane helices within its N-terminal ATPase domain. We solved the crystal structure of the proteolytic domain of Mj-Lon using multiwavelength anomalous dispersion, refining it to 1.9-angstroms resolution. The structure displays an overall fold conserved in the proteolytic domain of Ec-Lon; however, the active site shows uniquely configured catalytic Ser-Lys-Asp residues that are not seen in Ec-Lon, which contains a catalytic dyad. In Mj-Lon, the C-terminal half of the beta4-alpha2 segment is an alpha-helix, whereas it is a beta-strand in Ec-Lon. Consequently, the configurations of the active sites differ due to the formation of a salt bridge between Asp-547 and Lys-593 in Mj-Lon. Moreover, unlike Ec-Lon, Mj-Lon has a buried cavity in the region of the active site containing three water molecules, one of which is hydrogen-bonded to catalytic Ser-550. The geometry and environment of the active site residues in Mj-Lon suggest that the charged Lys-593 assists in lowering the pK(a) of the Ser-550 hydroxyl group via its electrostatic potential, and the water in the cavity acts as a proton acceptor during catalysis. Extensive sequence alignment and comparison of the structures of the proteolytic domains clearly indicate that Lon proteases can be classified into two groups depending on active site configuration and the presence of DGPSA or (D/E)GDSA consensus sequences, as represented by Ec-Lon and Mj-Lon.