Quantification and optimization of clot retraction in washed human platelets by Sonoclot coagulation analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Clot retraction is a pivotal process for haemostasis, where platelets develop a contractile force in fibrin meshwork and lead to the increased rigidity of clot. The pathophysiological alteration in contractile forces generated by the platelet-fibrin meshwork can lead to haemostatic disorders. Regardless of its utter significance, clot retraction remains a limited understood process owing to lack of quantification methodology. Sonoclot analysis is a point-of-care technique used in clinical laboratories for whole blood analysis that provides in vitro qualitative as well as quantitative assessment of coagulation process from initial fibrin formation to clot retraction. METHODS: Human washed platelets were isolated by differential centrifugation method and analysed via optical imaging, microscopy and Sonoclot analysis using 1-2 × 108 /mL of washed platelets, 1 U/mL of thrombin, 1 mg/mL of fibrinogen and 1 mM of calcium chloride. RESULTS: In this study, we demonstrate the novelty of this instrument in the quantitative evaluation of clot retraction in washed platelets and attempted to optimize the reference range of Sonoclot parameters including ACT - 87.3 ± 20.997, CR - 16.23 ± 3.538 and PF - 3.57 ± 0.629, (n = 10). DISCUSSION: Sonoclot analysis provides a simple and quantitative method to better understand in vitro clot retraction and its modulation by retraction components including platelet count, fibrinogen and platelet-fibrin interaction compared with existing conventional methods. Sonoclot may prove to be a valuable tool in thrombus biology research to understand fundamental basis of blood clot retraction.

Establishment of reference intervals for Platelet Function Analyzer -100 closure time in Algerian adults.

INTRODUCTION: The Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) is a point of care instrument that simulates plug formation under high shear flow. The PFA-100 measures the time required to occlude the aperture in a biochemically active cartridge and is expressed in a term of closure time (CT). In Algeria, the reference values used in clinical laboratories are of Western origin. However, ethnic, genetic, dietary environmental, and diet differences between populations may affect reference intervals. We established the reference intervals of PFA-100 closure times in healthy Algerian adults according to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry method, and we compared them with those of Western and Asian countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 303 healthy blood donors in the study. 218 subjects met inclusion criteria. We analyzed the blood sample on the PFA-100 for CT with both the collagen epinephrine and collagen ADP cartridges. RESULTS: The reference intervals of PFA-100 collagen epinephrine CT and PFA-100 collagen ADP CT were 91-207 seconds and 71-144 seconds, respectively. Compared to Western and Asian populations, there were significant differences. The upper limits of CTs were higher for Algerians in this study. Our findings show that many healthy Algerians would be incorrectly identified as having a primary hemostasis abnormality according to the reference intervals of the manufacturer and scientific literature. CONCLUSION: This report provides the first reference intervals for PFA-100 CTs in healthy Algerian adults. These results improve the accuracy of diagnosis and patient care in Algeria.

Efficacy of using thromboelastography to detect coagulation function and platelet function in patients with acute cerebral infarction.

Thromboelastography (TEG) is commonly used to predict coagulation state in patients with active bleeding. However, the correlation between TEG parameters and conventional tests in patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD) remains unexplored. Here, we assessed the TEG values and their correlation with conventional tests in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Eighty-eight patients with acute cerebral infarction were enrolled from the Department of Neurology of Suzhou Medical School. Thirty healthy controls were enrolled from the preventive care department in the same hospital who were taking a physical examination. TEG 5000 thromboelastogram system was used to obtain TEG parameters. The automatic blood coagulation analyzer was used to measure the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), D-Dimer (DD) and fibrinogen (FIB) and platelet function. Among five TEG parameters, the R and K value decreased while MA value, alpha angle and CI value increased in patient group when compared with the healthy controls. The correlation between TEG parameters and conventional tests including DD, FIB, and platelet function are consistent with the high coagulation state in the patient group. Our results demonstrate that TEG parameters are sensitive indicators of high coagulation state in patients with acute cerebral infarction.

Standardization and harmonization in hematology: Instrument alignment, quality control materials, and commutability issue.

INTRODUCTION: In the hub and spoke laboratory network, the number of hematology analyzers (HAs) within each core center has increased, and the control of HAs alignment is becoming necessary requirement to ensure analytical quality. In this scenario, HA alignment can be assessed by analyzing the same control material used for internal quality control on multiple HAs, assuming its commutability. The aim of the study was to verify the applicability of a protocol for the alignment of HAs based on control material rather than on fresh whole-blood samples. METHODS: The alignment of five HAs was evaluated for red (RBC, Hb, MCV, RET), white (WBC, NE, LY, MO, EO, BA, IG), and platelet (PLT) series parameters, following a protocol by SIBioC, using human sample (HS) and quality control material (QC), after the verification of commutability, according to the IFCC protocol. Maximum bias was derived from biological variation data. RESULTS: A complete alignment between instruments was confirmed for the majority of the parameters investigated both for HS and QC material. Partial misalignments or inconcludent results were instead evident for MCV, MO, EO, BA, and IG. Interestingly, QC material was found to be not commutable for LY, MO, and BA. CONCLUSION: The alignment of hematologic analyzers for main cell population parameters may be verified with both QC and HS, displaying consistent results and interpretation. The evaluation for some white series parameters (EO, BA, and IG) is critical, and particular attention must be paid to the values of the material used for the alignment.

A comparison of three platelet function tests in ischemic stroke patients with antiplatelet therapy.

Predicting the effectiveness of antiplatelet drugs is critical to precision antiplatelet therapy. However, there is a lack of an acceptable method, although there are a variety of methods for detecting platelet function. In this study, we compared three major platelet function tests to assess their performance and found better methods for platelet function evaluation after aspirin or clopidogrel treatment in ischemic stroke patients by comparative study. A total of 249 ischemic stroke patients were enrolled who were treated with aspirin or clopidogrel or both. Three platelet function tests including light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), thromboelastography (TEG), platelet function analyzer (PFA) were performed as well as CYP2C19 genotype determination. Correlation analyses and kappa statistics were used. All three methods were effective in evaluating aspirin function. However, only LTA and TEG had good correlation and consistency (r = -0.37, kappa = 0.634). TEG-ADP was the least sensitive for clopidogrel, as the platelet inhibition ratio did not differ between the clopidogrel-user group and the control (P = 0.074), while LTA and PFA were sensitive (P ＜ 0.001). Correlations between platelet assays were poor for clopidogrel (the absolute value of r range from 0.13 to 0.35) and so was the agreement (Kappa from 0.232 to 0.314). LTA and PFA have a good correlation with CYP2C19 genotyping (P = 0.034 and 0.014). In conclusion, all three tests were able to evaluate aspirin effect, LTA-AA and TEG-AA had a good correlation. TEG perform badly for clopidogrel effect detection. The fair-to-modest agreement among assays indicated further study was indispensable.

Screening on platelet LncRNA expression profile discloses novel residual platelet reactivity biomarker.

INTRODUCTION: Double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has wide inter-individual variabilities in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients' responses, which undermines the prognosis effect in clinical practice. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to be widely existed in platelets, albeit their potential roles in platelet responses to DAPT largely remains in the realm of the unknown. This study aims to screen differentially expressed lncRNAs responsible for high residual platelet reactivities under DAPT. METHODS: We enrolled 144 CHD patients that received DAPT and assigned them to high platelet reactivity (HPR) group and baseline group according to their residual platelet reactivities. Statistical analysis and a series of experiments including microarray analysis, platelet reactivity screening, RNA isolation and lncRNA microarray analysis were explored to the research. RESULTS: We detected a total of 22,424 kinds of co-expressed lncRNAs in three pairs of patients between the HPR and baseline groups. We identified twenty differentially expressed lncRNAs and successfully validated three of them in the 144 patients. Ultimately, the expression of ensemble transcript ENST00000433442 was demonstrated as significantly correlated with high platelet reactivity (OR = 0.487, P = .035) by logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: There is a considerable amount of lncRNAs in platelets, and the downregulated expression of ENST00000433442 is an independent risk factor for high residual platelet reactivity in CHD patients under DAPT.

Multicenter evaluation of analytical performances of platelet counts and platelet parameters: Carryover, precision, and stability.

INTRODUCTION: The correctness of the results of automated platelet analysis is still highly debated. The aim of this multicenter study, conducted according to international guidelines, was to verify the analytical performance of nine different types of hematology analyzers (HAs) in the automated platelet analysis. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-six peripheral blood samples (PB), collected in K3 EDTA tubes, were analyzed by ABX Pentra, ADVIA2120i, BC-6800, BC-6800 Plus, Cell-DYN Sapphire, DxH800, XE-2100, XE-5000, XN-20 with PLT-F App. Within-run imprecision and between-run imprecision were carried out using PB and material control, respectively. The carryover, low limit of quantification (LoQ), and the PB stability were evaluated. RESULTS: The carryover was absent for all HAs. The LoQ of PLT ranged between 2.0 (Cell-Dyn Sapphire) and 25.0 × 109 /L (ADVIA 2120i), while immature platelet fraction (IPF) ranged between 1.0 (XN-20) and 12.0 × 109 /L (XE-5000). The imprecision (%CV) increases as the platelet count decreases. No HAs showed desirable CVAPS for PLT counts less than 50.0 × 109 /L, with the exception of Cell-DYN Sapphire (CV 3.0% with PLT-O mean value of 26.7 × 109 /L), XN-20 (CV 2.4% with PLT-F mean value of 21.5 × 109 /L), and BC-6800 Plus (CV 1.9% with PLT-O mean value of 26.5 × 109 /L). The sample stability ranged between under two hours for MPV by ADVIA2120i and 8 hours for other PLT parameters and HAs. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study may provide useful information regarding carryover, precision, and stability of platelet counts and parameters, especially in thrombocytopenic samples. Moreover, the stability of sample for platelet analysis is conditioned by the HA and by temperature and storage time.

Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition.

In the context of interventional cardiology, platelet function testing may identify patients treated with P2Y12-inhibitors at an increased risk of mortality, thrombosis and bleeding. Several whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers are available; however, inter-device differences have not been examined systematically. To compare three platelet function tests under standardized in vitro conditions. Healthy volunteer (n = 10) blood samples were spiked with increasing concentrations of ticagrelor (0-7500 ng/mL) and/or ASA (0-3280 ng/mL), measured on three platelet function analyzers (TEG®6s, Multiplate®, and VerifyNow®) and respective Effective Concentration (EC) levels EC10, EC50 and EC90 were calculated. Repeatability was assessed in a separate group of pooled blood samples (n = 10) spiked with ticagrelor at EC10, EC50 and EC90. ASA had no impact on ADP-activated channels for all three devices. TEG®6s was able to distinguish (p ≤ 0.05) between all ticagrelor EC zones; VerifyNow® and Multiplate® were able to distinguish between three and two zones, respectively. Multiplate® showed the largest window between EC10 and EC90 (19-9153 ng/mL), followed by TEG®6s (144-2589 ng/mL), and VerifyNow® (191-1100 ng/mL). Drug effect models distribution of disagreements were identified for TEG®6s (5.0%), VerifyNow® (8.3%), and Multiplate® (13.3%). TEG®6s showed the smallest average coefficient of variation between EC conditions (5.1%), followed by Multiplate® (14.1%), and VerifyNow® (17.7%). Linear models could be generated between TEG®6s and Multiplate®, but not VerifyNow®. Significant differences were found between whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers and the clinical impact of these differences needs to be further investigated.

Measuring high on-treatment platelet reactivity in clinical practice; should we use a panel of platelet function tests?

: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) on P2Y12-inhibitors in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy is strongly associated with adverse ischaemic events. Studies have shown conflicting results with regard to the correlation and agreement between the different tests. Several assays are available to establish HPR. A composite advice based on more than one test might be a better way to identify HPR patients. To compare HPR rates and agreement between individual platelet function tests and a panel of three tests In our large percutaneous coronary intervention centre, all patients who suffered a stent thrombosis were invited back to a dedicated clinic. Platelet function testing was performed in all patients and matched control patients. HPR rates were compared between individual tests and with a composite comprised of three tests. A total of 242 patients were included, of whom in 193 patients all tests were available. HPR rates ranged from 14.6% [VerifyNow cut-off >235 platelet reactivity units (PRU)] to 49.7% (Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein Assay). HPR according to the composite advice (≥2 out of 3 tests indicating HPR) was present in 29.8% of patients. The best correlation with the composite advice was observed with light transmittance aggregometry (kappa = 0.78) and VerifyNow (lower cut-off >208 PRU; kappa = 0.68). VerifyNow with cut-off more than 235 PRU identified the smallest proportion of patients with HPR, whereas Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein Assay seemed to 'over-identify' HPR. In this real life patient cohort, a large variability was observed between four different platelet function tests. The use of a composite advice based on three tests is a promising alternative.

Updated Expert Consensus Statement on Platelet Function and Genetic Testing for Guiding P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Treatment in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the standard treatment for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The availability of different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor) with varying levels of potency has enabled physicians to contemplate individualized treatment regimens, which may include escalation or de-escalation of P2Y12-inhibiting therapy. Indeed, individualized and alternative DAPT strategies may be chosen according to the clinical setting (stable coronary artery disease vs. acute coronary syndrome), the stage of the disease (early- vs. long-term treatment), and patient risk for ischemic and bleeding complications. A tailored DAPT approach may be potentially guided by platelet function testing (PFT) or genetic testing. Although the routine use of PFT or genetic testing in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated patients is not recommended, recent data have led to an update in guideline recommendations that allow considering selective use of PFT for DAPT de-escalation. However, guidelines do not expand on when to implement the selective use of such assays into decision making for personalized treatment approaches. Therefore, an international expert consensus group of key leaders from North America, Asia, and Europe with expertise in the field of antiplatelet treatment was convened. This document updates 2 prior consensus papers on this topic and summarizes the contemporary updated expert consensus recommendations for the selective use of PFT or genotyping in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

External Quality Assurance of Platelet Function Assays: Results of the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Program.

CONTEXT.­: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) developed proficiency testing for platelet function assays by using blood collected by the participant added to challenge tubes containing either saline (normal) or tirofiban (abnormal). OBJECTIVE.­: To analyze platelet function proficiency testing for Platelet Function Analyzer PFA-100, platelet aggregation, PlateletWorks, and PlateletMapping. DESIGN.­: Proficiency testing data from 2012-2016 were analyzed. RESULTS.­: For PFA-100, a total of 1200 laboratories participated; the coefficient variation (CV) of cartridge closure times was 22% (saline); 44,952 of 45,616 survey responses (99%) provided an interpretation, and 42,934 of 44,952 (96%) were correct. For optical platelet aggregation, 190 laboratories participated; the CV was 17% (saline), 7444 of 7813 survey responses (95%) provided an interpretation, and 7015 of 7444 (94%) were correct. For PlateletWorks, 60 laboratories participated; the CV was 3% to 11% (saline); 2412 of 2454 survey responses (98%) provided an interpretation, and 1207 of 1276 (95%) were correct for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and 936 of 1136 (82%) for collagen. For PlateletMapping, 200 laboratories participated. For ADP, 1128 of 2697 survey responses (42%) provided an interpretation, but only 927 of 1128 (82%) were correct. For arachidonic acid, 1139 of 2604 survey responses (44%) provided an interpretation and 964 of 1139 (85%) were correct. CONCLUSIONS.­: CAP is the first to provide proficiency testing for platelet aggregation, PlateletWorks, and PlateletMapping. Platelet aggregation, PFA-100, and PlateletWorks using ADP as an agonist performed well with more than 90% of laboratories providing an interpretation and a similar number providing correct results. PlateletWorks using collagen and PlateletMapping showed worse interpretive accuracy than the other methods.

Flow cytometry for near-patient testing in premature neonates reveals variation in platelet function: a novel approach to guide platelet transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal haemorrhaging is often co-observed with thrombocytopenia; however, no evidence of a causal relationship with low platelet count has been reported. Regardless, the administration of a platelet transfusion is often based upon this parameter. Accurate measurement of platelet function in small volumes of adult blood samples by flow cytometry is well established and we propose that the use of the same technology could provide complementary information to guide the administration of platelet transfusions in premature neonates. METHODS: In 28 neonates born at 27-41 weeks gestation, platelet function after stimulation agonists was measured using fibrinogen binding and P-selectin expression (a marker of degranulation). RESULTS: Platelets of neonates with gestation of ≤36 weeks (n = 20) showed reduced fibrinogen binding and degranulation with ADP, and reduced degranulation with CRP-XL. Degranulation Scores of 7837 ± 5548, 22,408 ± 5301 and 53,131 ± 12,102 (mean ± SEM) identified significant differences between three groups: <29, 29-36 and >36 weeks gestation). Fibrinogen binding and degranulation responses to ADP were significantly reduced in suspected septic neonates (n = 6) and the Fibrinogen Binding scores clearly separated the septic and healthy group (88.2 ± 10.3 vs 38.6 ± 12.2, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometric measurement of platelet function identified clinically different neonatal groups and may eventually contribute to assessment of neonates requiring platelet transfusion.

Management of antiplatelet therapy for non-elective invasive procedures or bleeding complications: Proposals from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) and the French Study Group on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (GFHT), in collaboration with the French Society for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR).

The French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) and the French Study Group on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (GFHT), in collaboration with the French Society for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR), drafted up-to-date proposals on the management of antiplatelet therapy for non-elective invasive procedures or bleeding complications. The proposals were discussed and validated by a vote; all proposals could be assigned with a high strength. Management of oral antiplatelet agents in emergency settings requires knowledge of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, evaluation of the degree of alteration of haemostatic competence and the associated bleeding risk. Platelet function testing may be considered. When antiplatelet agent-induced bleeding risk may worsen the prognosis, measures should be taken to neutralize antiplatelet therapy, by considering not only the efficacy of available means (which can be limited for prasugrel and even more for ticagrelor), but also the risks that these means expose the patient to. The measures include platelet transfusion at the appropriate dose and haemostatic agents (tranexamic acid; recombinant activated factor VII for ticagrelor). When possible, postponing non-elective invasive procedures at least for a few hours until the elimination of the active compound (which could compromise the effect of transfused platelets) or, if possible, for a few days (reduction of the effect of antiplatelet agents) should be considered.

An optimized and validated 384-well plate assay to test platelet function in a high-throughput screening format.

Despite significant advances in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, antiplatelet therapies are still associated with a high risk of hemorrhage. In order to develop new drugs, methods to measure platelet function must be adapted for the high-throughput screening (HTS) format. Currently, all assays capable of assessing platelet function are either expensive, complex, or not validated, which makes them unsuitable for drug discovery. Here, we propose a simple, low-cost, and high-throughput-compatible platelet function assay, validated for the 384-well plate. In the proposed assay, agonist-induced platelet activity was assessed by three different methods: (i) measurement of light absorbance, which decreases with platelet aggregation; (ii) luminescence measurement, based on ATP release from activated platelets and luciferin-luciferase reaction; and (iii) automated bright-field microscopy of the wells and further quantification of platelet image area, described here for the first time. Brightfield imaging results were validated by demonstrating the similarity of dose-response curves obtained with absorbance and luminescence measurements after stimulating platelets, pre-incubated with prostaglandin E1 or tirofiban, and demonstrating the similarity of dose-response curves obtained with agonists. Assay quality was confirmed using the Z'-factor, a statistical parameter used to validate the robustness and suitability of an HTS assay. The results showed that, under high rotations per minute (1200 RPM), an acceptable Z'-factor score is reached for absorbance measurements (Z'-factor - 0.58) and automated brightfield imaging (Z'-factor - 0.52), without the need of replicates, while triplicates must be used to achieve an acceptable Z'-factor score (0.54) for luminescence measurements. Using low platelet concentration (4 × 104/µl - 10 µl), the brightfield imaging test was further validated using washed platelets. Furthermore, drug screening was performed with compounds selected by structure-based virtual screening. Taken together, this study presents an optimized and validated assay for HTS to be used as a tool for antiplatelet drug discovery.

Comparison of light transmission aggregometry and multiple electrode aggregometry for the evaluation of patients with mucocutaneous bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: The "gold standard" diagnostic test for assessing in vitro platelet function, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), has limitations to application because of sample requirements. Whole blood or multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) using the Multiplate® analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) requires smaller blood volumes and less sample manipulation than LTA, making it an attractive clinical testing option. Direct comparisons of MEA with LTA for diagnosis of platelet aggregation abnormalities are few. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients (66 F/33 M; median age 26 [range 2-86] years), referred for initial laboratory evaluation of mucocutaneous bleeding, had parallel MEA/LTA testing. Concentrations of ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), collagen, and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) that produced threshold responses in normal controls were used for testing patients. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of the 99 patients (30%) had at least one abnormal agonist response by LTA; 15 of these patients had >1 abnormal agonist response. Thirty-six patients (36%) had at least one abnormal agonist response by MEA; 27 had >1 abnormal agonist response. Sensitivity/specificity of MEA relative to LTA: ADP, 0.70/0.72; AA, 0.71/0.85; collagen, 0.85/0.71; TRAP 0.25/0.84. Negative predictive values (NPVs) for MEA relative to LTA: ADP, 0.90; AA, 0.93; collagen, 0.97; TRAP, 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: Specific abnormal results of MEA testing did not adequately predict specific abnormalities in LTA testing using threshold agonist concentrations. However, favorable NPVs suggest that MEA may be useful in screening patients for platelet aggregation abnormalities; those with normal MEA results not requiring further diagnostic testing by LTA.

Identification of aspirin resistance using a PDW-miR92a-score: Validation in an intermittent claudication cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Aspirin is a widely used platelet inhibitor to prevent thrombotic events. However, in 25% of patients the antiplatelet effect is insufficient. The current study aimed to validate a newly developed PDW-miR92a-score as a biomarker of the individual response to aspirin enabling targeted antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 209 patients with intermittent claudication on daily aspirin therapy. Based on results from the arachidonic acid stimulated aggregation test, patients were defined as aspirin resistant (n = 92) or responders (n = 117). Using the cut-off values for platelet distribution width (PDW) and plasma levels of microRNA-92a (miR-92a) defined in our pilot study, we investigated the performance of the combined PDW-miR92a-score in the validation study. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed in the validation cohort in order to optimize the cut-off values of the two score parameters. RESULTS: PDW and miR-92a levels were significantly higher in aspirin resistant compared to responding patients. When using the predefined cut-off values for PDW and miR-92a the combined PDW-miR92a score showed high specificity (93.1%) but poor sensitivity (19.8%) for aspirin resistance. By recalculation using new cut-off values identified in the validation cohort, a score with a specificity of 75% and a sensitivity of 54.9% was obtained. CONCLUSION: Both PDW and plasma levels of miR-92a were confirmed to be significantly higher in aspirin resistant compared to responding patients in our validation cohort. We were, however, unable to confirm the high sensitivity of the combined PDW-miR92a-score previously published by our group in a pilot study.

Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Essentials Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a rare heterogeneous group of inherited collagen disorders. A cohort of EDS patients was investigated for bleeding tendency and hemostatic abnormalities. EDS is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. EDS patients have platelet function abnormalities, whose severity correlates with bleeding risk. SUMMARY: Background Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) includes a heterogeneous group of connective tissue disorders affecting skin, bones, vessels, and other organs. Patients with EDS have an increased risk of bleeding, but a comprehensive study of hemostasis in EDS patients is lacking. Objective To investigate the bleeding tendency of a cohort of patients with EDS by using the Bleeding Assessment Tool of the ISTH, the bleeding severity score (BSS). Methods The BSS was defined as abnormal when it was ≥ 4 in men and ≥ 6 in women. Patients with a bleeding tendency were compared with those without in terms of type and number of hemostatic abnormalities. Results Fifty-nine of 141 patients with EDS (41.7%) had an abnormal BSS. Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time were slightly prolonged in 10 patients (7.1%) because of mild coagulation factor deficiencies, which were not responsible for the bleeding diathesis. von Willebrand factor antigen, ristocetin cofactor, endogenous thrombin potential and platelet count were normal in all patients. At least one platelet function abnormality was found in 53 patients (90%) with an abnormal BSS and in 64 (78%) with a normal BSS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-7.48). The risk of bleeding progressively increased with the number of platelet function abnormalities, reaching an OR of 5.19 (95% CI 1.32-20.45) when more than three abnormalities were detected. Conclusions Our results show that nearly half of patients with EDS have an abnormal BSS, which, in 90% of cases, appear, at least in part, to be attributable to platelet function abnormalities. Abnormalities of primary hemostasis may contribute to the risk of bleeding in patients with EDS.

Comparison of four methods to assess high-on platelet reactivity under P2Y12 receptor inhibitor.

P2Y12 receptor inhibitors are antiplatelet agents commonly prescribed in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Their efficacy can be limited by high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR), which can be evaluated by different biological assays. Most commonly, HPR is evaluated by flow cytometric vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation (VASP-P) assay, which can be time consuming. To evaluate the potential interest of novel technologies, we compared four different assays. Ninety patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitors were included. Four technologies were evaluated: the current standard test measuring VASP-P by flow cytometry, the historical reference test based on light transmittance aggregation (LTA), and two relatively novel techniques: whole blood multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and platelet function analyzer (PFA), which are less time consuming. The three latter tests were compared with the VASP-P assay as a reference using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis: LTA has an excellent comparability with the VASP test (ROC AUC > 0.9); the other two tests (multiplate and PFA) have only satisfactory comparability (ROC AUC around 0.7) and therefore may not replace the VASP "gold standard" test, if importance is attached to a quantitative assessment of the substitution parameter of VASP. Nevertheless, if a binary approach of the anti-aggregation result is sought, then one can conclude that the three tests are equivalent since Cohen's kappa coefficients are very close for the three tests (k = 0.548 for LTA; k = 0.554 for MEA; k = 0.570 for PFA/P2Y), and a similar proportion of patients are misclassified (15% for LTA, 14% for MEA, and 13.6% for PFA). Discriminant factor analysis using all the parameters provided by each test did not improve the diagnostic performance of MEA or PFA. In conclusion, only LTA shows a good comparability to the VASP assay using ROC curve analysis, probably because misclassified patients have results close to the cutoff values. All three tests have moderate agreement regarding the classification of patients as responders to P2Y12 inhibition.