Clinical Presentation of Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis, commonly known as eczema, is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis that can affect individuals from infancy to adulthood. Also referred to as "the itch that rashes," atopic dermatitis is classically associated with significant pruritus that is accompanied by characteristic cutaneous and other clinical findings. The diagnosis of atopic dermatitis can be challenging due to the wide range of clinical presentations based on patient factors such as age, skin type, ethnicity, and other comorbid conditions. This chapter reviews the classical findings as well as the less common manifestations of atopic dermatitis.

A Qualitative Tool to Guide in the Interpretation of the Numerical Rating Scale for Pruritus Intensity in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis is a cutaneous inflammatory disease characterized by intense pruritus, which is often underestimated despite its direct impact on patients' health-related quality of life and the high burden it poses. The authors' goal was to design a qualitative tool to guide patients and healthcare professionals in their assessment and interpretation of pruritus intensity using a numerical rating scale. The draft of this tool, henceforth "guideline", was developed based on a systematic literature review and focus groups comprising patients and a scientific committee. This draft was validated with an independent group of patients and the final version was designed following their feedback. According to the results of the systematic review, pruritus impacts 6 health-related quality of life domains: sleep quality; emotional status; overall health-related quality of life; physical function; social/sexual activity; productivity, particularly affecting sleep quality and the emotional domain. Patients considered that physical function was the most strongly affected domain, followed by sleep quality and emotional well-being, establishing that a minimum pruritus intensity of 4 and 7 points impacts moderately and severely, respectively, on the different domains of patients' health- related quality of life. The guideline may help patients and healthcare professionals to interpret and assess pruritus intensity using a numerical rating scale and to understand the impact of pruritus on patients' health-related quality of life.

[RECOMMENDATION FOR ITCH ASSESSMENT FROM THE ATOPIC ITCH CONSENSUS MEETING (AICOM)].

BACKGROUND: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research. METHODS: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants. RESULTS: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers. CONCLUSION: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.

Guselkumab in Patients with Scalp Psoriasis: A post hoc Analysis of the VOYAGE 2 Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial.

Scalp psoriasis affects approximately 80% of patients with psoriasis and can negatively impact their quality of life. This post hoc analysis of the VOYAGE 2 Phase III randomized clinical trial evaluated scalp response to guselkumab treatment and its association with skin response and patient-reported outcomes. The study included patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and baseline scalp psoriasis who were initially randomized to receive guselkumab. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on their achievement of a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 response at week 28: responder continuation, non-responder continuation and responder withdrawal. In all 3 groups, mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index head and scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment scores improved through week 28. In the responder withdrawal group, these scores worsened after treatment withdrawal at week 28, but remained stable through week 48 in both continuation groups. Trends in Dermatology Life Quality Index and Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary itch scores mirrored those of mean scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment scores through week 48. Within-subject correlations were 0.83 between scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index head scores and 0.78 between scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment and Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary itch scores. Through week 252, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index head scores remained stable in the responder continuation group, improved in the non-responder continuation group and rapidly improved by week 84 in the responder withdrawal group after retreatment.

Urticaria Pigmentosa Without Pruritus.

Mastocytosis is a group of disorders characterized by the pathologic accumulation of mast cells in various tissues. One example of mastocytosis is urticaria pigmentosa, which presents with mastocytomas that can cause hives and, when irritated, pruritus. To our knowledge, we are describing the first case of urticaria pigmentosa without pruritus. The patient had a positive Darier's sign, stated that they never felt itchy, and denied ever using a topical steroid or antihistamine. Although our patient declined additional testing, patients like this may benefit from a detailed evaluation of their sensory system through both quantitative sensory testing and genetic analysis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(3):     doi:10.36849/JDD.7558e.

Early and Sustained Improvements in Symptoms and Quality of Life with Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 52-Week Results from Two Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2).

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by increased itch, skin pain, poor sleep quality, and other symptoms that negatively affect patient quality of life. Upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 than JAK2, JAK3, or tyrosine kinase 2, is approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of upadacitinib on patient-reported outcomes over 52 weeks in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. METHODS: Data from two phase III monotherapy trials of upadacitinib (Measure Up 1, NCT03569293; Measure Up 2, NCT03607422) were integrated. Changes in pruritus, pain, other skin symptoms, sleep, quality of life, mental health, and patient impression were evaluated. Patient-reported outcome assessments included the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale, Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index, Patient Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Patient Global Impression of Treatment. Minimal clinically important differences, achievement of scores representing minimal disease burden, and the change from baseline were evaluated in patients who received upadacitinib through week 52 and in patients who received placebo through week 16. RESULTS: This analysis included 1609 patients (upadacitinib 15 mg, N = 557; upadacitinib 30 mg, N = 567; placebo, N = 485). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar across all arms. The proportion of patients treated with upadacitinib reporting improvements in itch increased rapidly by week 1, increased steadily through week 8, and was sustained through week 52. Patients receiving upadacitinib also experienced improvements in pain and other skin symptoms by week 1, which continued through week 16; improvements were maintained through week 52. Patient reports of improved sleep increased rapidly from baseline to week 1, increased steadily through week 32, and were sustained through week 52. Patients experienced quality-of-life improvements through week 8, which were maintained through week 52. By week 1, patients in both upadacitinib groups experienced rapid improvements in emotional state, and by week 12, patients also achieved meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression. Improvements in mental health continued steadily through week 32 and were maintained through week 52. Patients treated with upadacitinib 30 mg generally experienced improvements in patient-reported outcomes earlier than those treated with upadacitinib 15 mg. Through week 16, patients receiving upadacitinib experienced greater improvements versus those receiving placebo in all assessed patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with once-daily upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg experienced early improvements in itch, pain, other skin symptoms, sleep, quality of life, and mental health that were sustained through week 52. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03569293 (13 August 2018) and NCT03607422 (27 July 2018).

Atopic dermatitis, or eczema, is a condition that causes painful itchy dry skin, which is burdensome for patients and has a negative impact on quality of life. These symptoms frequently lead to disruption of daily activities such as school and work, decreased self-confidence, social isolation, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance. Symptoms of atopic dermatitis, such as itch and sleep disturbance, can only be assessed by patients. Therefore, it is important to consider patients' perceptions of their symptoms and the related impact on their quality of life, especially when evaluating treatment benefits. Upadacitinib is an orally administered drug approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In two clinical trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2), we investigated how treatment with upadacitinib (15-mg or 30-mg dose) given once daily to adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis would impact their symptoms and quality of life over a 1-year period. We measured changes over time in patients' assessments of itch, pain, other skin-related symptoms, sleep, daily activities, emotional state, mental health, and overall quality of life. Patients treated with upadacitinib experienced improvements in symptoms of atopic dermatitis and quality of life within the first 1­2 weeks of treatment. These improvements continued to steadily increase in the following weeks and lasted through 1 year of treatment. In conclusion, once-daily treatment with upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg led to early and lasting improvements in the well-being of patients with atopic dermatitis.

Assessing Itch Severity: Content Validity and Psychometric Properties of a Patient-Reported Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale in Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus, or itch, is a key symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD); as such, mitigating itch is an important outcome of AD treatment. This study explored the content validity and measurement properties of the Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (Pruritus NRS), a novel single-item scale for assessing itch severity in clinical trials of AD treatments. METHODS: In this mixed-methods study, qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 people with moderate-to-severe AD (n = 15 adult, n = 6 adolescent) to develop a conceptual model of the patient experience in AD and explore the content validity of the Pruritus NRS. Data collected daily from adults with moderate-to-severe AD enrolled in a phase 2b study (NCT03443024) were used to assess the Pruritus NRS' psychometric performance, including reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. Meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds were also determined using anchor-based methods. RESULTS: Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of itch in AD, including severity, persistence, frequency, and daily life interference. Patient debriefing of the Pruritus NRS indicated that the scale was relevant, appropriate, and interpreted as intended. Trial data supported overall good psychometric properties. MWPC was defined as a 3-point improvement in Pruritus NRS score, a finding supported by qualitative data. CONCLUSIONS: The Pruritus NRS provides a valid and reliable patient-reported measure of itching severity in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, and can detect change, indicating it is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the efficacy of AD treatments in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03443024.

Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in the Management of Chronic Pruritus in Older Adults: A Research Letter.

In this study, we aimed to analyze the literature to date on the utilization of topical calcineurin inhibitors in the management of pruritus among older adults, ages 65 and older. The 16 studies included in the final analysis demonstrated that topical calcineurin inhibitors are well tolerated across ages and are effective in treating a wide variety of chronic pruritic conditions. Collectively, these findings support that topical calcineurin inhibitors should be considered a safe, plausible option for managing age-associated itch. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2): doi:10.36849/JDD.7190e.

Diagnosis and management of pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease in hemodialyzed patients / Diagnostic et prise en charge du prurit associé à la maladie rénale chronique chez les patients hémodialysés

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a disabling symptom which is frequent and often underestimated. Pa-MRC has a negative impact on quality of life, and is frequently accompanied by sleep disorders and depression. The approval of difelikefalin ­ a kappa opioid receptor agonist ­ in this indication requires updated recommendations. As a first step, secondary causes of pruritus without skin lesions must be ruled out, and general measures taken (emollients, psychological support, optimization of dialysis, normalization of serum calcium, phosphate and PTH in the range proposed by the KGIDO guidelines, treatment of iron deficiency). A therapeutic test with a non-sedating oral antihistamine may be proposed. If this test is negative, Pa-MRC must be strongly suspected, and its intensity (WI-NRS scale) and impact on quality of life assessed. In the case of mild Pa-MRC (WI-NRS ≤ 3), only general measures are implemented. If Pa-MRC is moderate to severe (WI-NRS ≥ 4), specific treatment with difelikefaline can be initiated for 6 months in addition to general measures. At 3 months, if the response is complete (WI-NRS score ≤ 1) or partial (decline ≥ 3 points), treatment is continued. At 6 months, if the response is complete, treatment may be discontinued with the patient's agreement; treatment is maintained if the response is partial. At 3 or 6 months, if response is insufficient (decline < 3 points) and/or in the event of intolerance, treatment is discontinued and an alternative treatment (e.g., gabapentinoids, UVB) may be considered after dermatological consultation.

Le prurit associé à la maladie rénale chronique (Pa-MRC) est un symptôme invalidant qui est fréquent et souvent sous-estimé. Le Pa-MRC a des conséquences négatives sur la qualité de vie et s'accompagne fréquemment de troubles du sommeil et de dépression. L'approbation de la difélikéfaline ­ agoniste des récepteurs opioïdes kappa ­ dans cette indication nécessite l'actualisation des recommandations. Les causes secondaires de prurit sans lésions cutanées doivent être exclues et des mesures générales doivent être prises (émollients, aide psychologique, optimisation de la dialyse, équilibre phosphocalcique avec parathormone [PTH] dans la cible KDIGO [Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes], traitement de la carence martiale). Une épreuve thérapeutique avec un antihistaminique oral non sédatif peut être proposée. En cas de test négatif, il faut fortement suspecter un Pa-MRC et évaluer son intensité (échelle WI-NRS [Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale]) et son impact sur la qualité de vie. En cas de Pa-MRC léger (WI-NRS ≤ 3), seules les mesures générales sont mises en œuvre. Si le Pa-MRC est modéré à sévère (WI-NRS ≥ 4), un traitement spécifique par difélikéfaline peut être instauré pour 6 mois en plus des mesures générales. À 3 mois, si la réponse est complète (score WI-NRS ≤ 1) ou partielle (baisse ≥ 3 points), le traitement est poursuivi. À 6 mois, si la réponse est complète, l'arrêt du traitement peut être envisagé avec l'accord du patient ; il est maintenu en cas de réponse partielle. À 3 ou 6 mois, en cas de réponse insuffisante (baisse < 3 points) et/ou d'intolérance, le traitement est interrompu et un autre traitement (par exemple, gabapentinoïdes, ultraviolet de type B [UVB]) peut être envisagé après avis dermatologique.

Evaluation of measurement errors in the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) outcome.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) is the recommended core outcome instrument for atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms. POEM is reported by recalling the presence/absence of seven symptoms in the last 7 days. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate measurement errors in POEM recordings due to imperfect recall. METHODS: Using data from a clinical trial of 247 AD patients aged 12-65 years, we analysed the reported POEM score (r-POEM) and the POEM derived from the corresponding daily scores for the same seven symptoms without weekly recall (d-POEM). We quantified recall error by comparing the r-POEM and d-POEM for 777 patient-weeks collected from 207 patients, and estimated two components of recall error: (1) recall bias due to systematic errors in measurements and (2) recall noise due to random errors in measurements, using a bespoke statistical model. RESULTS: POEM scores have a relatively low recall bias, but a high recall noise. Recall bias was estimated at 1.2 points lower for the r-POEM on average than the d-POEM, with a recall noise of 5.7 points. For example, a patient with a recall-free POEM of 11 (moderate) could report their POEM score anywhere from 5 to 14 (with 95% probability) because of recall error. Model estimates suggested that patients tend to recall itch and dryness more often than experienced (positive bias of less than 1 day), but less often for the other symptoms (bleeding, cracking, flaking, oozing/weeping and sleep disturbance; negative bias ranging 1-4 days). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical trial data set, we found that patients tended to slightly underestimate their symptoms when reporting POEM, with significant variation in how well they were able to recall the frequency of their symptoms every time they reported POEM. A large recall noise should be taken into consideration when interpreting POEM scores.

Relationship between Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Uremic Pruritis in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Uremic pruritus (UP) is one of the most distressing symptoms in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is a biochemical condition with high prevalence in HD patients. The present multicentric study aimed to assess the relationship between UP and SCH in HD patients. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study included 328 HD patients. All patients were submitted to careful history through clinical examination and standard laboratory assessment. Pruritis was evaluated using the pruritis visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were diagnosed with SCH if they had TSH levels above the upper limit of the normal reference range in association with normal free thyroxine (FT4) levels. RESULTS: Among the studied patients, there were 196 patients (59.8 %) with UP. Comparison between patients with UP and patients without revealed that patients in the former group had significantly longer HD duration (median (IQR): 47.5 (27.0-72.5) versus 36.0 (23.0-50.5) months, p < 0.001) and lower Kt/v (median (IQR): 1.4 (1.09-1.7) versus 1.54 (1.12-1.91), p = 0.009). Moreover, they had significantly higher ferritin (median (IQR): 653.0 (526.0-800.0) versus 628.0 (470.8- 716.0) ng/mL), hsCRP (median (IQR): 12.0 (8.0-14.0) versus 8.0 (6.0-9.0) mg/dL, p < 0.001) and TSH levels (median (IQR): 4.34 (1.98-5.2) versus 3.34 (1.9-4.85) µIU/ml) with a significantly higher frequency of SCH (45.9 % versus 28.8 %, p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis identified hemodialysis duration (OR (95%) CI): 1.02 (1.009-1.028), p < 0.001), ferritin levels (OR (95% CI): 1.002 (1.001-1.003), p < 0.001), and SCH (OR (95% CI): 0.54 (0.32-0.89), p = 0.016) as significant predictors of UP. CONCLUSION: The present study suggested a possible link between SCH and the development of UP in HD patients.

Which Clinical Measurement Tools for Atopic Dermatitis Severity Make the Most Sense in Clinical Practice?

Assessment of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity is essential for therapeutic decision making and monitoring treatment progress. However, there are a myriad of clinical measurement tools available, some of which are impractical for routine clinical use despite being recommended for clinical trials in AD. For measurement tools to be used in clinical practice, they should be valid, reliable, rapidly completed, and scored, and easily incorporated into existing clinic workflows. This narrative review addresses content, validity, and feasibility, and provides a simplified repertoire of assessments for clinical assessment of AD based on prior evidence and expert opinion. Tools that may be feasible for clinical practice include patient-reported outcomes (eg, dermatology life quality index, patient-oriented eczema measure, numerical rating scales for itch, pain, and sleep disturbance, AD Control Tool, and patient-reported global assessment), and clinician-reported outcomes (eg, body surface area and investigator's global assessment). AD is associated with variable clinical signs, symptoms, extent of lesions, longitudinal course, comorbidities, and impacts. Any single domain is insufficient to holistically characterize AD severity, select therapy, or monitor treatment response. A combination of these tools is recommended to balance completeness and feasibility.

Tralokinumab Provides Clinically Meaningful Responses at Week 16 in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Do Not Achieve IGA 0/1.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Investigator's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) is a difficult endpoint to achieve after short-term treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, and does not fully reflect clinically meaningful changes in other parameters. We assessed the impact of tralokinumab versus placebo on other clinically meaningful parameters in patients not achieving IGA 0/1 at week 16 using pooled data from two monotherapy phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and 2. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included patients (n = 1328) from ECZTRA 1 and 2 who did not achieve the co-primary endpoint, IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication. Endpoints evaluating atopic dermatitis extent and severity included proportions of patients achieving IGA 0/1, 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50/75/90); endpoints evaluating patient-reported outcomes included a ≥ 3-point improvement in worst daily pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), a ≥ 3-point improvement in eczema-related sleep interference (sleep) NRS, a ≥ 4-point improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DLQI ≤ 5. Specifically, clinically meaningful responses were defined as EASI-50, a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS, or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI at week 16. RESULTS: Among ECZTRA 1 and 2 patients who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved EASI-50 (33.0% vs 13.0%), a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS (22.6% vs 9.4%), or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI (41.2% vs 24.5%) at week 16. In addition, compared with placebo, a numerically greater proportion of tralokinumab-treated patients achieved all three measures of clinically meaningful response (30% vs 18%) or a clinically meaningful change in at least one outcome (48.8% vs 28.5%). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved additional clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes, such as EASI-75 (13.5% vs 4.1%), EASI-90 (3.5% vs 1.1%), DLQI ≤ 5 (22.5% vs 12.5%), and a ≥ 3-point improvement in sleep NRS (24.5% vs 11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab provided clinically meaningful responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 and/or used rescue medication. Using multiple validated outcome measures of both efficacy and quality of life, alongside IGA scores, can better characterize tralokinumab treatment responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. [Video abstract available] CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03131648 (ECZTRA 1); study start date: 30 May, 2017; primary completion date: 7 August, 2018; study completion date: 10 October, 2019. NCT03160885 (ECZTRA 2); study start date: 12 June, 2017; primary completion date: 4 September, 2019; study completion date: 14 August, 2019. Video abstract: Tralokinumab provides clinically meaningful responses at week 16 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who do not achieve IGA 0/1 (MP4 362818 KB).

Ondansetron for the Prevention of Pruritus in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery With Intrathecal Opioid: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus is a frequently reported and unpleasant side effect following intrathecal opioid use with frequency further increased among parturients. We have performed a systematic review to assess the overall efficacy of ondansetron for the prevention of pruritus in patients receiving intrathecal opioid as part of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted from date of inception to September 2022. Studies that included patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia using intrathecal opioid were included. The primary outcome was the presence of pruritus, and the secondary outcome was time to onset of pruritus. Data from included studies were pooled for analysis using an appropriately determined random-effects model. Outcomes were presented using forest plots and 95% confidence intervals. Additional sensitivity and subgroup analysis were performed. Trial sequential analysis was conducted for the primary outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-three randomized controlled trials with a total of 2586 patients were included: 1219 received ondansetron, 1030 received a placebo, and a further 337 received a different study drug and were excluded from analysis. Opioids used in the included studies were morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil. Patients who received ondansetron showed a significant reduction in the incidence of pruritus compared to the control group (RR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.92; I 2 = 64%). There was no significant difference in pruritus onset between the groups (mean difference [MD], 17.54 minutes; 95% CI, -2.18 to 37.26; I 2 = 83%). The overall Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment of quality of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review has demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of pruritus following the use of ondansetron. This is in contrast to previously published meta-analyses. Studies included were of varying quality and some at high risk of bias with a high degree of statistical heterogeneity. Furthermore, high-quality and well-powered studies are required to confirm these findings.

Prevalence, patient burden and physicians' perception of pruritus in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is an underrated symptom in patients with impaired kidney function. The present study assessed the prevalence, impact on quality of life (QoL) and risk factors for CKD-aP in a contemporary national cohort of patients on haemodialysis. In addition, we evaluated attending physicians' awareness and approach to therapy. METHODS: Validated patient's and physician's questionnaires on pruritus severity and QoL were used in combination with information obtained by the Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry. RESULTS: The prevalence of mild, moderate and severe pruritus in 962 observed patients was 34.4%, 11.4% and 4.3%. Physicians' estimated prevalence values were 25.0 (95% CI 16.8-33.2), 14.4 (11.3-17.6) and 6.3% (4.9-8.3), respectively. The estimated national prevalence estimate extrapolated from the observed patients was 45.0% (95% CI 39.5-51.2) for any, 13.9% (95% CI 10.6-17.2) for moderate and 4.2% (95% CI 2.1-6.2) for severe CKD-aP. CKD-aP severity was significantly associated with impaired QoL. Risk factors for moderate-severe pruritus were higher C-reactive protein [odds ratio (OR) 1.61 (95% CI 1.07-2.43)] and parathyroid hormone (PTH) values [OR 1.50 (95% CI 1.00-2.27)]. Therapy for CKD-aP included changes in the dialysis regimen, topical treatments, antihistamines, gabapentin and pregabalin and phototherapy in a majority of centres. CONCLUSIONS: While the overall prevalence of CKD-aP in our study is similar to that in previously published literature, the prevalence of moderate-severe pruritus is lower. CKD-aP was associated with reduced QoL and elevated markers of inflammation and PTH. The high awareness of CKD-aP in Austrian nephrologists may explain the lower prevalence of more severe pruritus.

HIV: Inflammatory dermatoses.

Patients living with HIV may experience a variety of inflammatory dermatoses, ranging from exacerbations of underlying conditions to those triggered by HIV infection itself. This article presents a current literature review on the etiology, diagnosis and management of atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, pityriasis rubra pilaris, lichen planus, seborrheic dermatitis, eosinophilic folliculitis, pruritic papular eruption and pruritus, in patients living with HIV.