[Refractive outcome and prognostic factors for success of intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus: A retrospective study of 75 eyes]. / Résultats réfractifs et facteurs pronostiques de succès du traitement du kératocône par anneaux intracornéens : étude rétrospective sur 75 yeux.

PURPOSE: To define the prognostic factors for success and to evaluate the predictability of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) in the treatment of keratoconus. METHODS: In this retrospective study conducted at the University Hospital of Nantes, Keraring ICRS were implanted in 75 eyes of 65 patients with keratoconus. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction and corneal topography were analysed. To define prognostic factors, we compared the results of 2 groups: "IMP" (gain of at least 2 lines of BSCVA) and "ROS" (the others). We evaluated the predictability of the nomogram with a mathematical model proposed by Pena-Garcia et al. (IOVS 2012). RESULTS: At 3 months, BSCVA improved from 0.3 to 0.2 logMAR (P<0.05). A total of 61 % of the patients experienced a gain of at least 1 line of BSCVA. Spherical equivalent decreased by 2.32 diopters (D), cylinder decreased by 2.47 D, and maximal keratometry by 2.62 D (P<0.05 for each compared with preoperative values). A total of 90 % of the patients whose BSCVA did not improve achieved a significant refractive improvement. A preoperative BSCVA>0.3 logMAR is a prognostic factor for gain of at least 2 lines of BSCVA (P=1.6E-3). Predictability was fair: only 43 % had a±1D difference from the spherical equivalent predicted by the nomogram. There was no statistically significative difference between gain or loss of BSCVA predicted by the mathematical model and the postoperative results. CONCLUSIONS: ICRS are visually and refractively effective. Predictability could be improved by using mathematical models and knowledge of prognostic factors for success, allowing for better patient selection.

Visual performance of scleral lenses and their impact on quality of life in patients with irregular corneas / Desempenho visual das lentes esclerais e seu impacto na qualidade de vida de pacientes com córneas irregulares

ABSTRACT Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the visual quality performance of scleral contact lenses in patients with keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, and post-keratoplasty astigmatism, and their impact on quality of life. Methods: We included 40 patients (58 eyes) with keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, and post-keratoplasty astigmatism who were examined between October 2014 and June 2017 and fitted with scleral contact lenses in this study. Before fitting scleral contact lenses, we noted refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity, spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected contrast sensitivity, and spectacle-corrected contrast sensitivity. We performed corneal topography on and applied a questionnaire that included the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire to all participants. We recorded corrected contrast sensitivity and corrected distance visual acuity on the third month after fitting scleral contact lenses and requested that subjects repeat the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire. Results: The mean age of patients was 28.12 ± 13.19 years. Mean logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity, spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity, and corrected distance visual acuity with scleral contact lenses were 0.91 ± 0.21 (0.40-1.80), 0.57 ± 0.12 (0.10-1.80), and 0.16 ± 0.02 (0.00-1.30), respectively. We observed significantly higher corrected distance visual acuity with scleral contact lenses compared with uncorrected distance visual acuity and spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (p<0.05). Mean uncorrected contrast sensitivity, spectacle-corrected contrast sensitivity and CCS with scleral contact lenses were 0.97 ± 0.12 (0.30-1.65), 1.16 ± 0.51 (0.30-1.80), and 1.51 ± 0.25 (0.90-1.80), respectively. Significantly higher contrast sensitivity levels were recorded with scleral contact lenses compared with those recorded with uncorrected contrast sensitivity and spectacle-corrected contrast sensitivity (p<0.05). We found the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire overall score for patients with scleral contact lens treatment to be significantly higher compared with that for patients with uncorrected sight (p<0.05). Conclusion: Scleral contact lenses are an effective alternative visual correction method for keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, and post-keratoplasty astigmatism. A significant increase in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity can be obtained with scleral contact lenses in patients with irregular corneas.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o desempenho da qualidade visual das lentes de contato esclerais em pacientes com ceratocone, degeneração marginal transparente e astigmatismo pós-ceratoplastia e seu impacto na qualidade de vida. Métodos: Foram incluídos 40 pacientes (58 olhos) com ceratocone, degeneração marginal transparente ou astigmatismo pós-ce­ratoplastia que foram examinados entre outubro de 2014 e junho de 2017 e adaptados com lentes de contato esclerais neste estudo. Antes de ajustar as lentes de contato esclerais, registrou-se refração, acuidade visual à distância não corrigida, acuidade visual à distância corrigida por óculos, sensibilidade ao contraste não corrigida e sensibilidade ao contraste corrigida por óculos. Rea­lizamos topografia da córnea e aplicamos um questionário que incluía o Questionário de Funcionamento Visual do National Eye Institute para todos os participantes. Registramos a sensibilidade ao contraste corrigida e corrigimos a acuidade visual à distância no terceiro mês após a adaptação das lentes de contato esclerais e solicitamos aos participantes que repetissem o Questionário de Funcionamento Visual do National Eye Institute. Resultados: A idade média dos pacientes foi de 28,12 ± 13,19 anos. A acuidade visual à distância não corrigida logMAR média, a acuidade visual à distância corrigida por óculos e a distância visual corrigida com as lentes de contato esclerais foram 0,91 ± 0,21 (0,40-1,80), 0,57 ± 0,12 (0,10-1,80), 0,16 ± 0,02 (0,00-1,30), respectivamente. Observamos uma acuidade visual à distância corrigida significativamente maior com lentes de contato esclerais em comparação à acuidade visual à distância não corrigida e à acuidade visual à distância corrigida por óculos (p<0,05). Sensibilidade ao contraste médio não corrigido, sensibilidade ao contraste corrigida por óculos e CCS com lentes de contato esclerais foram 0,97 ± 0,12 (0,30-1,65), 1,16 ± 0,51 (0,30-1,80), 1,51 ± 0,25 (0,90-1,80), respectivamente. Significativamente maiores níveis de sensibilidade ao contraste foram registrados com lentes de contato esclerais em comparação com aqueles registrados com sensibilidade ao contraste não corrigida e sensibilidade ao contraste corrigida por óculos (p<0,05). Descobrimos que a pontuação geral do Questionário de Funcionamento Visual do National Eye Institute para pacientes em tratamento com lentes de contato esclerais é significativamente maior em comparação com pacientes com visão não corrigia (p<0,05). Conclusão: As lentes de contato esclerais constituem um método alternativo eficaz de correção visual alternativa para o ceratocone, degeneração marginal transparente e o astigmatismo pós-ceratoplastia. Um aumento significativo na acuidade visual e sensibilidade ao contraste pode ser obtido com lentes de contato esclerais em pacientes com córneas irregulares.

Visual performance of scleral lenses and their impact on quality of life in patients with irregular corneas.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the visual quality performance of scleral contact lenses in patients with keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, and post-keratoplasty astigmatism, and their impact on quality of life. METHODS: We included 40 patients (58 eyes) with keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, and post-keratoplasty astigmatism who were examined between October 2014 and June 2017 and fitted with scleral contact lenses in this study. Before fitting scleral contact lenses, we noted refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity, spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected contrast sensitivity, and spectacle-corrected contrast sensitivity. We performed corneal topography on and applied a questionnaire that included the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire to all participants. We recorded corrected contrast sensitivity and corrected distance visual acuity on the third month after fitting scleral contact lenses and requested that subjects repeat the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 28.12 ± 13.19 years. Mean logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity, spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity, and corrected distance visual acuity with scleral contact lenses were 0.91 ± 0.21 (0.40-1.80), 0.57 ± 0.12 (0.10-1.80), and 0.16 ± 0.02 (0.00-1.30), respectively. We observed significantly higher corrected distance visual acuity with scleral contact lenses compared with uncorrected distance visual acuity and spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (p<0.05). Mean uncorrected contrast sensitivity, spectacle-corrected contrast sensitivity and CCS with scleral contact lenses were 0.97 ± 0.12 (0.30-1.65), 1.16 ± 0.51 (0.30-1.80), and 1.51 ± 0.25 (0.90-1.80), respectively. Significantly higher contrast sensitivity levels were recorded with scleral contact lenses compared with those recorded with uncorrected contrast sensitivity and spectacle-corrected contrast sensitivity (p<0.05). We found the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire overall score for patients with scleral contact lens treatment to be significantly higher compared with that for patients with uncorrected sight (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Scleral contact lenses are an effective alternative visual correction method for keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, and post-keratoplasty astigmatism. A significant increase in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity can be obtained with scleral contact lenses in patients with irregular corneas.

Avaliação da melhora da acuidade visual após adaptação de lentes de contato em pacientes portadores de ceratocone / Evaluation of visual acuity improvement after adaptation of contact lenses in patients with keratoconus

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia na adaptação de lentes de contato em relação à melhora da acuidade visual em pacientes portadores de ceratocone. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo, através de revisão de prontuários médicos, em 175 pacientes (326 olhos) portadores de ceratocone, atendidos no período de março/2004 a junho/2015. Foram coletados os dados sobre sexo, idade, número de olhos adaptados, severidade do ceratocone e acuidade visual com óculos e com lentes de contato. Resultados: Dos pacientes avaliados, 100 pacientes (57,4%) eram do sexo feminino e 75 pacientes (42,6%) do sexo masculino. Dos olhos classificados, 267 (81,9%) tinham ceratocone moderado (45 a 52D). A faixa etária mais frequente foi de 10-39 anos (84%) e a taxa de sucesso ao fim do tratamento foi de 92,3% (acuidade visual boa ou satisfatória). Conclusão: A adaptação de lentes de contato mostrou-se eficaz em proporcionar importante melhora da acuidade visual em pacientes portadores de ceratocone.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of the contact lens adaptation in relation to the improvement of visual acuity in patients with keratoconus. Methods: A retrospective study of 175 patients (326 eyes) with keratoconus was carried out from March 2004 to June 2015. Data on sex, age, number of adapted eyes, keratoconus severity, and visual acuity with glasses and contact lenses were collected. Results: Of the classified eyes, 267 (81.9%) had moderate keratoconus (45 to 52D). The most frequent age group was 10-39 years of age (84%) and the success rate at the end of treatment was 92.3% (good or satisfactory visual acuity). Conclusion: Adaptation of contact lenses was effective in providing important improvement of visual acuity in patients with keratoconus.

Patient-related barriers to Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) lens wear among keratoconus patients in Jordan.

PURPOSE: To assess potential patient-related barriers to rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens wear for vision rehabilitation in a sample of keratoconus (KC) patients in Jordan. METHODS: Barriers for RGP contact lens wear among KC patients were discussed and specified by a focus group which consisted of five optometrists who are involved in contact lens practice. The focus group addressed potential barriers for RGP lens wear from the patient's perspective. The identified barriers were then used to design the final questionnaire used in the study. The questionnaire consisted of 8 questions which ask the participant to rate, within a 5-points scale (1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree), how each suggested item is considered a barrier for RGP lens wear. RESULTS: 204 KC patients (86 females, 118 males) were involved in a semi-structured interview to answer the questionnaire. The average age of participants was 30.85 (±8.74) years old and ranged from 18 to 62 years. The average age of diagnosis of KC (±standard deviation) is 21.96 (±7.22) years old with a range of 12-52 years. All participants reported that they had never tried RGP lenses for their vision rehabilitation; however, other management options were reported such as glasses, keratoplasty, collagen cross linking and Intacs. The mean score of total barriers to RGP wear was high at 3.8 (±0.4) (out of 5). The major identified barriers were: lack of awareness of the benefits of RGP lenses, fear of possible lens complications, lack of medical insurance and high cost of the lens. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals that several barriers were identified as prevalent. Consequently, there is an imperative need to adopt better planning strategies for management protocol of KC in order to assure best eye care service for KC patients in Jordan.

New web-based algorithm to improve rigid gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To calculate and validate a new web-based algorithm for selecting the back optic zone radius (BOZR) of spherical gas permeable (GP) lens in keratoconus eyes. METHODS: A retrospective calculation (n=35; multiple regression analysis) and a posterior prospective validation (new sample of 50 keratoconus eyes) of a new algorithm to select the BOZR of spherical KAKC design GP lenses (Conoptica) in keratoconus were conducted. BOZR calculated with the new algorithm, manufacturer guidelines and APEX software were compared with the BOZR that was finally prescribed. Number of diagnostic lenses, ordered lenses and visits to achieve optimal fitting were recorded and compared those obtained for a control group [50 healthy eyes fitted with spherical GP (BIAS design; Conoptica)]. RESULTS: The new algorithm highly correlated with the final BOZR fitted (r2=0.825, p<0.001). BOZR of the first diagnostic lens using the new algorithm demonstrated lower difference with the final BOZR prescribed (-0.01±0.12mm, p=0.65; 58% difference≤0.05mm) than with the manufacturer guidelines (+0.12±0.22mm, p<0.001; 26% difference≤0.05mm) and APEX software (-0.14±0.16mm, p=0.001; 34% difference≤0.05mm). Close numbers of diagnostic lens (1.6±0.8, 1.3±0.5; p=0.02), ordered lens (1.4±0.6, 1.1±0.3; P<0.001), and visits (3.4±0.7, 3.2±0.4; p=0.08) were required to fit keratoconus and healthy eyes, respectively. CONCLUSION: This new algorithm (free access at www.calculens.com) improves spherical KAKC GP fitting in keratoconus and can reduce the practitioner and patient chair time to achieve a final acceptable fit in keratoconus. This algorithm reduces differences between keratoconus GP fitting (KAKC design) and standard GP (BIAS design) lenses fitting in healthy eyes.

Measurement of visual function among patients undergoing corneal transplantation using the VF-14 index in Morocco.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Moroccan version of the VF-14 in candidates for keratoplasty and to assess their quality of life using this tool before and after transplantation. METHODS: This is a longitudinal prospective study that assessed 57 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty, recruited in the ophthalmology service in Marrakech over 5 years. The original VF-14 questionnaire was adapted into Moroccan dialect. The questionnaire was administered before and 2 years after transplantation. The VF-12 questionnaire was also used, deleting the last two items. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 software. Comparisons of VF-14 scores before and after transplantation used the Wilcoxon test for paired samples. RESULTS: In total, 57 patients participated in the study. The most frequent indication for surgery was keratoconus (44%). All patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty. Chronbach's alpha value was 0.989 for VF-14 and 0.990 for VF-12. The two scores were negatively correlated with logMAR visual acuity. The strongest correlation was found with VA in the fellow eye. The average best-corrected visual acuity of the eye scheduled for keratoplasty was 1.1±0.16 logMAR. The average of VF-14 was 53±3. After keratoplasty, the average best-corrected visual acuity of operated eye was 0.34±0.31. The average postoperative astigmatism was 3 D. After keratoplasty, an increase in VF-14 score was observed from 53.5 to 81.92 (P<0.001). In postoperative follow-up, graft rejection was noted in two patients and maculopathy in a single patient. DISCUSSION: Graft transparency, absence of complications, minimal astigmatism, and good visual acuity have long been indicators of a successful corneal transplant. However, this does not provide information on visual quality and its impact on everyday life. It is in this sense that the VF-14 was adapted into several languages, as reliable, valid and sensitive as the original Anglo-American version, to assess objectively and subjectively the quality of life of patients after keratoplasty. CONCLUSION: With advances in techniques and availability of better materials, surgical success in performing keratoplasty is increasing. At the same time, vision-related quality of life of corneal graft recipients deserves more attention from ophthalmologists.

Descriptive analysis of the type and design of contact lenses fitted according to keratoconus severity and morphology.

PURPOSE: Keratoconus is characterized by bilateral asymmetrical corneal ectasia that leads to inferior stromal thinning and corneal protrusion. There is currently a lack of consensus regarding the most efficacious method for fitting contact lenses in patients with keratoconus, given the various topographical patterns and evolution grades observed in affected populations. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the association between keratoconus evolution grade and topography pattern and the type and design of fitted contact lens. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of contact lenses fitted in a total of 185 patients with keratoconus (325 eyes). Keratoconus was classified as either grade I, II, III, or IV based on keratometry and cone morphology (nipple, oval, globus, or indeterminate) results. RESULTS: A total of 325 eyes were evaluated in the present study. Of the 62 eyes classified as grade I, 66.1% were fitted with monocurve contact lenses. Of the 162 eyes classified as grade I and II, 51%, 30%, and 19% were fitted with adapted monocurve rigid gas-permeable contact lenses (RGPCL), bicurve lenses, and others lens types, respectively. Bicurve lenses were fitted in 52.1% and 62.2% of eyes classified as grade III and IV, respectively. Of the eyes classified as grade III and IV, monocurve and bicurve RGPCL were fitted in 26% and 55%, respectively. In eyes with oval keratoconus, 45%, 35%, and 20% were fitted with monocurve lenses, bicurve lenses, and other lens types, respectively. In eyes with round cones (nipple morphology), 55%, 30%, and 15% were fitted with bicurve lenses, monocurve lenses, and other lens types, respectively. CONCLUSION: Monocurve RGPCL were most frequently fitted in patients with mild to moderate keratoconus and oval cones morphology, while bicurve lenses were more frequently fitted in patients with severe and advanced keratoconus. This was probably because bicurve lenses are more appropriate for round cones due to increased corneal asphericity.

[Femtosecond-assisted Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring implantation for treatment of keratoconus: Functional outcomes at one year]. / Anneaux intra-cornéens Ferrara implantés au laser femtoseconde dans le traitement du kératocône : résultats fonctionnels à 1 an.

INTRODUCTION: Intrastromal corneal rings (ICR) have been used for several years for the correction of irregular astigmatism in patients with keratoconus. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of femtosecond-assisted ICR implantation for treatment of keratoconus and to define predictive factors of success. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study of patients with keratoconus who underwent femtosecond-assisted Ferrara ICR implantation between December 2012 and May 2014 at the University Hospital of Besançon. To determinate predictive factors of success, we divided patients into 2 groups based on the gain of at least two lines of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 year after surgery ("good responders") or the gain of only one line of BCVA, no change, or the loss of lines of BCVA ("poor responders"). For each group, we analyzed preoperative refractive and keratometric values. Moreover, to verify if preoperative visual acuity could be a predictive factor of success, four groups were created based on initial visual acuity, and postoperative BCVA was compared. RESULTS: We retrospectively studied 32 eyes of 29 patients with keratoconus who underwent femtosecond-assisted Ferrara ICR implantation between December 2012 and May 2014 at the University Hospital of Besançon. From one month to 1 year postoperatively, we observed a significant improvement in BCVA and a significant decrease in cylinder and keratometry values (P<0.05). In total, 90.6% of patients had an increase in visual acuity (VA) of at least one line within 1 year while 9.4% had a decrease or stability of their VA. The average cylinder value decreased from -4.81±2.45 diopters (D) preoperatively to -2.39±1.94 D (P<0.001) at 1 year postoperatively, and the average of the maximum keratometry from 51.14±3.89 D to 48.52±4.00 D (P<0.05). Four predictive factors of success were statistically significant: type of ectasia (type 1 or 2), stage of keratoconus (Krumeich 1 or 2), implantation of only 1 ICR and a preoperative VA less than 0.4 (decimal scale). Eighty-six percent of patients with an initial VA<0.4 (decimal scale) gained 2 lines of BCVA within 1 year and 80% 3 lines versus 52% and 41%, respectively for patients with initial VA≥0.4 (decimal scale). CONCLUSION: Femtosecond-assisted Ferrara ICR implantation for treatment of keratoconus is a reliable and reversible technique. Implantation results in greater efficiency for patients with moderately advanced asymmetric keratoconus with an initial VA<0.4 (decimal scale).

Evaluation of RGP Contact Lens Fitting in Keratoconus Patients Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Model and Genetic Algorithms.

Keratoconus is a progressive non-inflammatory disease of the cornea. Rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPs) are prescribed when the disease progresses. Contact lens fitting and assessment is very difficult in these patients and is a concern of ophthalmologists and optometrists. In this study, a hierarchical fuzzy system is used to capture the expertise of experienced ophthalmologists during the lens evaluation phase of prescription. The system is fine-tuned using genetic algorithms. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the final system are 88.9%, 94.4% and 92.6% respectively.

Descriptive analysis of the type and design of contact lenses fitted according to keratoconus severity and morphology / Análise descritiva dos tipos e parâmetros das lentes de contato adaptadas de acordo com o grau evolutivo e a morfologia do ceratocone

ABSTRACT Purpose: Keratoconus is characterized by bilateral asymmetrical corneal ectasia that leads to inferior stromal thinning and corneal protrusion. There is currently a lack of consensus regarding the most efficacious method for fitting contact lenses in patients with keratoconus, given the various topographical patterns and evolution grades observed in affected populations. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the association between keratoconus evolution grade and topography pattern and the type and design of fitted contact lens. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of contact lenses fitted in a total of 185 patients with keratoconus (325 eyes). Keratoconus was classified as either grade I, II, III, or IV based on keratometry and cone morphology (nipple, oval, globus, or indeterminate) results. Results: A total of 325 eyes were evaluated in the present study. Of the 62 eyes classified as grade I, 66.1% were fitted with monocurve contact lenses. Of the 162 eyes classified as grade I and II, 51%, 30%, and 19% were fitted with adapted monocurve rigid gas-permeable contact lenses (RGPCL), bicurve lenses, and others lens types, respectively. Bicurve lenses were fitted in 52.1% and 62.2% of eyes classified as grade III and IV, respectively. Of the eyes classified as grade III and IV, monocurve and bicurve RGPCL were fitted in 26% and 55%, respectively. In eyes with oval keratoconus, 45%, 35%, and 20% were fitted with monocurve lenses, bicurve lenses, and other lens types, respectively. In eyes with round cones (nipple morphology), 55%, 30%, and 15% were fitted with bicurve lenses, monocurve lenses, and other lens types, respectively. Conclusion: Monocurve RGPCL were most frequently fitted in patients with mild to moderate keratoconus and oval cones morphology, while bicurve lenses were more frequently fitted in patients with severe and advanced keratoconus. This was probably because bicurve lenses are more appropriate for round cones due to increased corneal asphericity.

RESUMO Objetivo: O ceratocone é uma ectasia corneana bilateral e assimétrica que leva a afinamento corneano inferior e protrusão da córnea, não existe consenso sobre qual é o melhor caminho para adaptar lentes de contato em pacientes com ceratocone, considerando seus diferentes padrões topográficos e graus de evolução. O objetivo desse estudo é associar o grau de evolução e padrão topográfico com o tipo/desenho da lente adaptada. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva das lentes de contato adaptadas em 185 pacientes com ceratocone (325 olhos) no Departamento de Lentes de Contato. O ceratocone foi classificado de acordo com a ceratometria em graus I, II, III e IV e de acordo com a morfologia em cone redondo, oval, globoso e indeterminado. Resultados: Foram avaliados 325 olhos. Em 66,1% dos olhos com grau I foi adaptada lente monocurva. Dos 162 olhos classificados como graus I e II foram adaptadas lentes monocurva em 51%, bicurva em 30% e outros em 19%. Em relação aos olhos grau III, em 52,1% foram adaptadas lentes bicurvas e o mesmo aconteceu em 62,2% dos olhos com grau IV. Apenas 26% dos olhos grau III ou IV receberam lentes monocurva, com necessidade de bicurvas em 55%. 45% dos cones ovais foram adaptados com lentes monocurva, 35% com bicurvas e 20% com outros tipos, enquanto 55% dos cones redondos foram adaptados com lentes bicurvas, apenas 30% com monocurvas e 15% com outros desenhos. Conclusão: Lentes de contato rígida gás-permeável (LCRGP) monocurvas são mais frequentemente utilizadas em ceratocones leves e moderados e em ovais, enquanto bicurvas são mais usadas para casos graves e avançados e em cones redondos.

A retrospective analysis of vision correction and safety in keratoconus patients wearing Toris K soft contact lenses.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the Toris K silicone hydrogel contact lens (SwissLens; Prilly, Switzerland) in keratoconus patients. A database with information on 50 keratoconus patients (64 eyes) fitted with Toris K soft contact lenses over a 2-year period was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, prefitting refraction, the reason for choosing the Toris K soft contact lens, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), best-corrected visual acuity with a rigid gas permeable lens (BCVA RGP), best-corrected visual acuity with the Toris K lens (BCVA Toris K), and complications were evaluated. The mean age ± standard deviation at the time of fitting was 27.92 ± 9.86 years. The mean spherical refractive power was -4.62 ± 6.53 dioptres, and the mean cylinder was -3.78 ± 2.43 dioptres. The most common reason for using Toris K soft contact lenses was an inability to fit the patient with a RGP contact lens. There was a statistically significant difference between UCVA and BCVA Toris K (p = 0.0001), as well as between BSCVA and BCVA Toris K (p = 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between BCVA Toris K and BCVA RGP (p = 0.20). Superficial punctate keratitis and giant papillary conjunctivitis were the most common complications. The Toris K contact lens is a viable alternative for the optical management of all grades of keratoconus. The Toris K soft contact lens is a promising alternative for the visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients who cannot tolerate RGP lenses or achieve a good fit.

Clinical performance of a new hybrid contact lens for keratoconus.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical performance of the Clearkone hybrid contact lens for the treatment of keratoconus against the habitual contact lens of the patients. METHODS: A total of 33 eyes from 18 patients were fitted with the Clearkone. High- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA and LCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and contrast sensitivity acuity (CSF) were recorded with habitual lenses (prestudy visit) and after 1 week, 15 days, and 1 month of wear of prescribed Clearkone. Subjective vision and comfort were rated using visual analogue scales (VAS). RESULTS: Three patients discontinued the study, one because of diffuse corneal staining after 1 day of use and the other two because of extreme discomfort. The rest of the patients completed the 1-month study. High contrast visual acuity and LCVA (logMAR) improved significantly from 0.16 ± 0.12 and 0.44 ± 0.22, respectively, with the patient's habitual contact lenses to -0.006 ± 0.058 and 0.23 ± 0.13 after 1 day wearing Clearkone, remaining significant during all follow-up visits (P<0.001; repeated measures analysis of variance [RM-ANOVA]). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean CCT. The improvement of CSF was statistically significant with hybrid contact lenses prescribed compared with the patient's habitual contact lenses (P<0.001; RM-ANOVA test). Improvement in VAS score, with prescribed Clearkone, was statistically significant for comfort (P=0.043; RM-ANOVA test), but not for the subjective vision (P=0.759; RM-ANOVA test). CONCLUSIONS: Clearkone provides an improvement in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and subjective comfort in patients with keratoconus when compared with other contact lens options. However, clinicians must get specific training to fit the lens and be aware of potential adverse events.

[Keratoconus lenses: the small correction miracle]. / Keratokonuslinse: Das kleine Korrektionswunder.

Keratoconus is a non-inflammatory corneal disease associated with a cone-shaped protrusion and progressive corneal thinning. Apart from progression control and stabilizing interventions, correcting the optical error induced by a mostly highly irregular corneal surface is of paramount importance with respect to quality of life and ability to work. This goal can be achieved efficiently by contact lenses with only rare adverse conditions. This article provides a current overview on contact lens fitting in keratoconus and presents own associated results.

Evaluation of contact lens-induced changes in keratoconic corneas using in vivo confocal microscopy.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively analyze laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images of all corneal layers in contact lens-wearing and noncontact lens-wearing keratoconus patients. METHODS: The study population included rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens-wearing keratoconus patients (group 1; N = 29), keratoconus patients who did not wear contact lenses (group 2; N = 30), and subjects who neither had keratoconus nor wore contact lenses (group 3; N = 30), with groups 2 and 3 matched to group 1 by age and sex. The central cornea was examined with IVCM in all subjects. The mean duration of contact lens wear was 5.50 ± 3.68 years (range, 2-15 years). RESULTS: Eyes with keratoconus showed significantly lower basal epithelial cell and anterior and posterior stromal keratocyte densities, as well as subbasal nerve fiber density, nerve branch density, and nerve fiber length compared with healthy control subjects. Furthermore, compared with group 2, group 1 had significantly lower basal epithelial cell density (4920 ± 476 cells/mm(2) vs. 4503 ± 461 cells/mm(2), P = 0.001) and anterior stromal keratocyte density (561 ± 91 cells/mm(2) vs. 464 ± 55 cells/mm(2), P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference for posterior stromal keratocyte density (P = 0.808), endothelial cell density (P = 0.699), or subbasal nerve fiber density (P = 0.142), nerve branch density (P = 0.614), and nerve fiber length (P = 0.850). CONCLUSIONS: Significant corneal microstructural abnormalities were observed in eyes with keratoconus. RGP contact lens wear was associated with a further reduction in the basal epithelial cell and anterior stromal keratocyte densities, but with no effect on posterior stromal keratocyte density, endothelial cell density, or corneal nerve morphology.

Partial visual rehabilitation using a toric implantable collamer lens in a patient with keratoconus: a case report with 20 months of follow-up.

We report the case of a 37-year-old man with a high myopic keratoconus eye that was treated with a posterior chamber toric implantable collamer lens (ICL) in Korea. The patient had a history of contact lens intolerance and did not want to have a corneal transplantation. His uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle corrected visual acuity were 0.02 and 0.4 in the left eye, respectively. Preoperatively, the manifest refraction was -12.0 -3.5 × 30A. Postoperatively, the manifest refraction was -1.75 × 180A. UCVA improved markedly after implantation. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed during 20 months of follow-up. Toric ICL implantation may be a possible alternative surgical option for the visual rehabilitation of high myopic astigmatism in keratoconus patients with rigid gas permeable contact lens intolerance and in patients who do not want to get a corneal transplant.

An assessment of the optimal lens fit rate in keratoconus subjects using three-point-touch and apical touch fitting approaches with the rose K2 lens.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the number of ordered lenses required to achieve an optimal lens fit between three-point-touch and apical touch fittings in keratoconus subjects with nipple and oval cones using the first definite apical clearance lens (FDACL) as a starting point. METHODS: First trial lens was selected following manufacturer's guidelines and the back optic zone radius (BOZR) was flattened or steepened in 0.10 mm steps until a FDACL was found. Subsequently, subjects were randomly allocated to three-point-touch (BOZR 0.10 mm flatter than FDACL) and apical touch fittings (BOZR 0.40 mm flatter than FDACL). Changes were made solely in total lens diameter, edge lift, and/or back vertex power until an optimal lens fit was achieved. Differences between fitting approaches were compared in terms of optimal lens fit rates defined as the percentage of subjects successfully fitted with the first lens ordered from the manufacturer. RESULTS: Sixty-one subjects (109 eyes) were randomly allocated to three-point-touch and apical touch fitting approaches. An average of 2.3 trial lenses were necessary to achieve the FDACL. An optimal lens fit rate was achieved with the first lens in 84 of 109 eyes (77%). No statistically significant differences in optimal lens fit rates were found between three-point-touch and apical touch fitting approaches (83% and 71%, respectively; P = 0.12) and between nipple and oval cones (81% and 68%, respectively; P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the FDACL provides a systematic, reliable, and repeatable starting point for Rose K2 contact lens fitting in keratoconus. Eye care practitioners should anticipate higher optimal lens fit rates when using three-point-touch (83%) in comparison with apical touch contact lens fittings (71%).

Utility of a semi-scleral contact lens design in the management of the irregular cornea.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of the Rose K2 XL semi-scleral contact lens (Menicon Co. Ltd., Nagoya, Japan) in the management of the irregular cornea. METHODS: Twenty-seven subjects (34 eyes) with irregular corneas referred for contact lens fitting were evaluated. A diagnostic trial set was used in the fitting process. Once the trial lens was considered optimal, a final lens was ordered from the manufacturer with the necessary changes in power, edge lift and diameter. We analyzed visual acuity, number of lenses ordered and patients' ability to wear and handle lenses. RESULTS: Twenty-three subjects (30 eyes) were fitted with the Rose K2 XL lens. Four subjects (4 eyes) decided not to conclude the fitting process for different reasons. Average logMAR visual acuity without correction and with the lens was 0.82 and 0.09, respectively (p<0.001). An average of 1.4 ordered lenses (range 1-3) were necessary to achieve the optimal fit. Nineteen eyes (63%) were fitted with the first lens ordered. Three subjects (13%) had problems with lens handling, and three subjects (4 eyes) abandoned the wear of the lenses after three months due to discomfort (3 eyes) and unsatisfactory visual acuity (1 eye), respectively. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 9 months. CONCLUSION: Rose K2 XL semi-scleral contact lens provides good visual acuity and comfort in patients with irregular corneas.