Analysis of causes and prognostic impact of tube occlusion during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), a rare tumor from mucinous appendiceal origins, is treated with Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, tubing blockages during HIPEC treatment pose a common challenge, impeding the smooth progression of therapy. Few studies to date have explored the incidence and risk factors of tube occlusion during HIPEC in patients with appendiceal PMP, as well as its adverse impact on postoperative complications. METHODS: From October 2017 to June 2023, a total of 80 patients with appendiceal PMP undergoing combined CRS and HIPEC were included in this study. Tubing blockage events were strictly defined, with patients experiencing blockages during HIPEC treatment allocated to the study group, while those with unobstructed perfusion were assigned to the control group. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups regarding post-HIPEC health assessments and occurrence of complications. Risk factors for luminal occlusion during closed HIPEC procedures were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis of data from 303 HIPEC treatments. RESULTS: Tubing blockages occurred in 41 patients (51.3%). The study group experienced prolonged gastrointestinal decompression time (4.1 ± 3.0 vs. 2.5 ± 1.7 days, P = 0.003) and prolonged time to bowel movement (6.1 ± 2.3 vs. 5.1 ± 1.8 days, P = 0.022) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups. The 1-year survival rate postoperatively was 97%, and the 3-year survival rate was 81%, with no association found between tubing blockage and poorer survival. Additionally, In 303 instances of HIPEC treatment among these 80 patients, tube occlusion occurred in 89 cases (89/303, 29.4%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed age, diabetes, hypertension, and pathology as independent risk factors for tube occlusion. CONCLUSION: Tubing blockages are a common occurrence during HIPEC treatment, leading to prolonged postoperative gastrointestinal functional recovery time. When patients are elderly and have concomitant hypertension and diabetes, along with a histological type of low-grade mucinous tumor, the risk of tube occlusion increases. However, this study did not find a significant correlation between tubing blockage and the incidence of postoperative complications or overall patient survival.

The management of goal-directed fluid therapy during cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Cytoreductive surgery is a surgical treatment approach that has been applied over the last 3 decades in patients with peritoneal metastases originating from intraabdominal organs. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is an approach in which a patient fluid therapy during a medical procedure or surgery is carefully managed based on a specific goal. In this study, we aimed to present the results of GDFT in patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) during the perioperative period. This retrospective study included 398 patients patient who underwent cytoreductive surgery + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) due to PC originating from intraabdominal malignancies. Of the cases, 233 (58.6%) were female, and 165 (41.4%) were male patients. The mean age was 58.9. Perioperative findings revealed an average PC score of 12 (3-24), average lactate levels of 3 (2-7) mmol/L, Pao2/fio2 of 3.3 (2.4-4.1) mm Hg, mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 60 (55-70), average surgery duration of 6.5 hours (3-14), and average blood loss of 400 (200-4000) cc. The mean intraoperative fluid rate was 6.4 mL/kg/h (IQR 5.8-7.1). Sixteen (16.3%) patients experienced Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-4 adverse events. Within 30 days, 25 patients (6.3%) died. CRS + HIPEC procedures utilizing perioperative GDFT along with advanced anesthesia monitoring devices have shown successful application, offering an alternative to traditional and restrictive fluid management approaches.

Colorectal carcinoma peritoneal metastases-derived organoids: results and perspective of a model for tailoring hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy from bench-to-bedside.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRCPM) are related to poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been reported to improve survival, but peritoneal recurrence rates are still high and there is no consensus on the drug of choice for HIPEC. The aim of this study was to use patient derived organoids (PDO) to build a relevant CRCPM model to improve HIPEC efficacy in a comprehensive bench-to-bedside strategy. METHODS: Oxaliplatin (L-OHP), cisplatin (CDDP), mitomycin-c (MMC) and doxorubicin (DOX) were used to mimic HIPEC on twelve PDO lines derived from twelve CRCPM patients, using clinically relevant concentrations. After chemotherapeutic interventions, cell viability was assessed with a luminescent assay, and the obtained dose-response curves were used to determine the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations. Also, induction of apoptosis by different HIPEC interventions on PDOs was studied by evaluating CASPASE3 cleavage. RESULTS: Response to drug treatments varied considerably among PDOs. The two schemes with better response at clinically relevant concentrations included MMC alone or combined with CDDP. L-OHP showed relative efficacy only when administered at low concentrations over a long perfusion period. PDOs showed that the short course/high dose L-OHP scheme did not appear to be an effective choice for HIPEC in CRCPM. HIPEC administered under hyperthermia conditions enhanced the effect of chemotherapy drugs against cancer cells, affecting PDO viability and apoptosis. Finally, PDO co-cultured with cancer-associated fibroblast impacted HIPEC treatments by increasing PDO viability and reducing CASPASES activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that PDOs could be a reliable in vitro model to evaluate HIPEC schemes at individual-patient level and to develop more effective treatment strategies for CRCPM.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy With Cisplatin and Doxorubicin for 90 Minutes Versus 60 Minutes After Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS). Does the 30-Minute Difference Matter? A Comparative Study in a High Volume Centre.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study compared the perioperative outcomes after the same combination of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) compounds when administered for 90 min vs. 60 min, while all other therapy variables remained constant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients were included with peritoneal surface malignancy who underwent cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (15 mg/m2) closed HIPEC after cytoreductive surgery. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (54.2%) in the 60 min and 55 patients (45.8%) in the 90 min HIPEC group were compared. Patients, tumor characteristics, and postoperative complications were comparable. The only significant difference was the rate of chest drain/pleural puncture with an incidence of 18.5% and 34.5% in the 60 min and 90 min group, respectively (p=0.045). After adjustment in a multi-variable regression analysis, the odds for patients with HIPEC 90 min of having chest drain or pleural puncture in comparison to patients with HIPEC 60 min was still higher, but not significant with an OR of 2.238 (95%CI=0.932-5.373; p=0.071). CONCLUSION: HIPEC administered for 90 min is safe and does not increase perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to the 60-min administration.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Combined treatment modality of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is emerging as an alternative option for colorectal peritoneal metastases, but there is ambiguity regarding patient selection, treatment protocols, and efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To elaborate on the patient characteristics, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy protocol and health outcomes in colorectal peritoneal metastases patients undergoing a combination of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery and provide guidance for future studies. DATA SOURCES: A Medline search for English language studies published between 2004 and 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Medical subject headings and key terms, including: hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, colorectal peritoneal metastases, colorectal cancer and combinations thereof as per guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, disease-free survival, and morbidity and mortality rates. RESULTS: Of the 26 included studies, 42% were published between 2016 and 2019. More than half of the studies were retrospective in nature and conducted in tertiary specialized centers outside of the United States. The median age range was 44 to 62 years. Mitomycin C-based therapy was seen in 50% of studies. Mean weighted median disease-free survival for 11 studies was 15 months (9 to 36 months). Median OS ranged from 12 to 63 months, with an average of 33.6 months among 20 studies. Overall morbidity varied from 11% to 56%, with a weighted mean of 29% in 18 studies. Mortality ranged from 0 to 34%, with a weighted mean of 4% in 15 studies. LIMITATIONS: Despite careful study selection, variability in methodology of the included studies can limit review findings. CONCLUSION: Due to study heterogeneity, and a recent large, randomized trial showing no overall benefit, use of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal peritoneal metastases patients is highly controversial. Further standardized controlled studies can help uniformly define and build consensus among the medical community on patient eligibility and the optimal hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy techniques. PROSPERO: Registered on March 3, 2020, CRD42020146942.

Regional therapy trials in peritoneal metastases: The path to standardization of care for gastric cancer.

As the peritoneum is the most common site of metastatic disease at diagnosis, disease identified at staging laparoscopy, and site of recurrence for patients with gastric cancer, intraperitoneal therapy has been an area of interest for many investigators. There are several ways to categorize the existing trials and studies. One is by indication, which includes palliative, neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and prophylactic. Another is by treatment modality which includes approaches such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, intraperitoneal normothermic chemotherapy, and bidirectional combinations of systemic and intraperitoneal therapy. Recently completed and ongoing trials of peritoneal therapy in gastric cancer may be improving on the historically dismal survival rates for patients with carcinomatosis or disease at high risk of peritoneal recurrence. All completed randomized trials are from outside the United States, and additional studies of peritoneal therapy in Western populations are needed to clarify survival outcomes. Cooperative group trials and multi-institutional registry study efforts are ongoing to help address this clear area of unmet need.

Preventive HIPEC in combination with perioperative FLOT versus FLOT alone for resectable diffuse type gastric and gastroesophageal junction type II/III adenocarcinoma - the phase III "PREVENT"- (FLOT9) trial of the AIO /CAOGI /ACO.

BACKGROUND: The main reason for treatment failure after curative surgical resection of gastric cancer is intra-abdominal spread, with 40-50% peritoneal seeding as primary localization of recurrence. Peritoneal relapse is seen in 60-70% of tumors of diffuse type, compared to only 20-30% of intestinal type. Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemoperfusion (HIPEC) is an increasingly used therapy method for patients with peritoneal metastases. The preventive use of HIPEC could represent an elegant approach for patients (pts) before macroscopic peritoneal seeding, since pts. with operable disease are fit and may have potential risk of microscopic involvement, thus having a theoretical chance of cure with HIPEC even without the need for cytoreduction. No results from a PCRT from the Western hemisphere have yet been published. METHODS: This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study including a total of 200 pts. with localized and locally advanced diffuse or mixed type (Laurens's classification) adenocarcinoma of the stomach and Type II/III GEJ. All enrolled pts. will have received 3-6 pre-operative cycles of biweekly FLOT (Docetaxel 50 mg/m2; Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; Leucovorin 200 mg/m2; 5-FU 2600 mg/m2, q2wk). Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive surgery only and postoperative FLOT (control arm) or surgery + intraoperative HIPEC (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 solution administered at a temperature of 42 °C for 90 min) and postoperative FLOT (experimental arm). Surgery is carried out as gastrectomy or transhiatal extended gastrectomy. Primary endpoint is PFS/DFS, major secondary endpoints are OS, rate of pts. with peritoneal relapse at 2 and 3 years, perioperative morbidity/mortality and quality of life. The trial starts with a safety run-in phase. After 20 pts. had curatively intended resection in Arm B, an interim safety analysis is performed. Recruitment has already started and first patient in was on January 18th, 2021. DISCUSSION: If the PREVENT concept proves to be effective, this could potentially lead to a new standard of therapy. On the contrary, if the outcome is negative, pts. with gastric cancer and no peritoneal involvement will not be treated with HIPEC during surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered on June 25th, 2020 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04447352 ; EudraCT: 2017-003832-35 .

Survival and complications of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Peritoneal cancer is an uncommon form of terminal malignancy with substantial morbidity and mortality. While both young and elderly population groups with peritoneal cancer are treated by joint cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, studies suggest that they might have a differential prognostic outcome in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. To date, only one review has attempted to evaluate the comparative impact of postoperative complications and overall mortality in these age groups. However, a recent publication of several high-quality cohort trials needs an update of the existing consensus. To compare the impact of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on postoperative complications and overall mortality in younger and elderly population groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the academic literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines across five databases: Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the comparative outcomes between the impact of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on postoperative complications and overall mortality in younger and elderly population groups. RESULTS: From 963 studies, 16 eligible studies that evaluated the comparative outcomes of morbidity and mortality between 3067 young and 878 elderly patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included. A meta-analysis revealed higher risks of postoperative complications (Odds ratio: 1.18, 95% C.I: 0.90 to 1.55) and overall mortality (3.28, 1.93 to 5.5) for elderly patients as compared to the younger patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There were no differences in risks of the onset of anastomotic leakage (1.0, 0.47 to 2.14) and duration of hospital stay (Hedge's g: 0.02, -0.08 to 0.14) between elderly and younger patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides updated evidence regarding poor postoperative morbidity and mortality outcomes in elderly patients as compared to younger patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and may help clinicians to better stratify the risks associated with the conventional management of peritoneal carcinomatosis in elderly population groups.

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Aim: Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) predicts overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal cancer. We explored LMR in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). Materials & methods: We identified all patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for colorectal or appendiceal adenocarcinoma at our institution. We analyzed LMR's relationship with clinicopathologic variables with Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analyses and multivariable Cox regression models with 5-year OS. Results: Two hundred and sixteen patients underwent CRS/HIPEC. Five-year OS for low LMR (≤3.71) was 35.2 versus 60.4% for elevated LMR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.1-3.5; p = 0.02). On multivariable Cox-regression, elevated LMR was significantly associated with OS (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: LMR is an independent predictor of OS in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for colorectal and appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

Anastomotic leak following interval debulking surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in women with advanced epithelial ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate the incidence and associated risk factors for anastomotic failure following interval debulking surgery (IDS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in women with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in women with stage III/IV high-grade ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS with colorectal resection and HIPEC from 2017 to 2020. These patients were compared to a historical control cohort who underwent IDS with colorectal resection without HIPEC from 2009 to 2016. Data was collected for demographics, surgical variables, and perioperative outcomes. The univariate analysis compared progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: 61 women were identified; 21 (34.4%) underwent IDS with HIPEC from 2017 to 2020, and 40 underwent IDS alone from 2009 to 2016. None of the patients who had IDS with HIPEC had protective ileostomy, compared to 10.0% of those who received had IDS alone (n = 4)(p = 0.29). The cumulative incidence of anastomotic leak rate was 8.2% (n = 5). There was no significant difference in anastomotic leak rate for women who underwent IDS with HIPEC (9.5%, n = 2) versus without HIPEC (7.5%, n = 3) (p = 0.99). While there was no difference in PFS (12.2 vs. 13.3 months, log-rank p = 0.31), OS (9.4 vs. 40.6 months, log-rank p = 0.013) was significantly decreased following postoperative anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective series of women with advanced ovarian cancer, HIPEC was not associated with increased risk for anastomotic leak at the time of IDS with colorectal resection and reanastomosis. While further study is needed, HIPEC alone should not preclude colorectal resection or dictate practices for colonic diversion in IDS.

Desmoplastic Small Round-cell Tumor: Retrospective Review of Institutional Data and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic small round-cell tumor (DSCRT) in adults is an extremely rare (age-adjusted incidence 0.3 per million) and aggressive sarcoma with limited data for optimal management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with DSCRT diagnosis (2010-2020) was performed following Institutional Review Board approval. The follow-up period was from pathological diagnosis to the last patient contact. Endpoints were type of response and duration of response. RESULTS: In the current analysis, first-line treatment in all cases was vincristine, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VAC-IE) with 100% response for a mean duration of 9.8 (range=5-12) months. Patients received 1-4 subsequent lines of therapy. All patients received temozolomide with irinotecan (50% partial response, duration 8-9 months). Two patients that underwent consolidative cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy had a longer survival (30.6 vs. 11.2 months). Patients suffered 100% mortality with a median survival was 17.8 (range=11.2-30.6) months. CONCLUSION: While aggressive multimodality treatment is always warranted for DSCRT, the options are limited by the multicentric presentation, short-lived initial response and lack of established subsequent therapy portending a poor prognosis. Consolidative cytoreductive surgery following first-line therapy may improve survival.

Pancytopenia after administration of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin-C: local therapy and systemic toxicity.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) coupled with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the standard of treatment for many cancers with peritoneal metastasis. Mitomycin-C (MMC), the most common chemotherapy utilized with HIPEC, is associated with neutropenia but the degree of hematologic toxicity is unclear when splenectomy is included as part of CRS with MMC. We present an interesting case of pancytopenia following treatment with HIPEC using MMC and comment on the possible role of splenectomy in exacerbating its cytotoxic effects. Our unique case highlights potential hematologic toxicity following MMC-HIPEC and splenectomy. It suggests that spleen removal may enhance toxicity profiles of chemotherapy such as MMC. Because MMC is the preferred agent of choice used in CRS-HIPEC, future studies should investigate optimal MMC dosing and patient selection when splenectomy is performed to balance survival benefit with hematologic toxicities.

Dense hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin in patients with stage III serous epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of interval debulking surgery (IDS) combined with dense hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin in Chinese patients with FIGO stage III serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: This retrospective single-center study reviewed the demographic and clinical data of 197 patients with primary FIGO stage III serous EOC who were treated with IDS with (n = 121) or without (n = 76, control group) dense HIPEC between January 2012 and April 2017. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: The median PFS was 24 months in the IDS plus dense HIPEC group, whereas it was 19 months in the IDS alone group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.65, p = 0.000). The median OS in patients treated with IDS plus dense HIPEC (51 months) was significantly longer than that in patients treated with IDS alone (40 months, HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.78, p = 0.001). The demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics of these two groups were comparable (p > 0.05). In the IDS alone group, no adverse events were recorded in 42 (55.3%) of the 76 patients, and 14 (18.4%) patients were reported to have grade III/IV adverse events. In the IDS plus dense HIPEC group, no adverse events were recorded in 55 (45.5%) of the 121 patients, and 23 (19.0%) patients were reported to have grade III/IV adverse events. No postoperative deaths occurred within 30 days in either group and neither did severe fatal complications in the IDS plus dense HIPEC group. CONCLUSIONS: IDS plus dense HIPEC with cisplatin in Chinese patients with FIGO stage III serous EOC is associated with improved survival and is reasonably well tolerated by patients.

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix With Histologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Review of Histologic and Clinical Spectrum of Epithelial Neoplastic Mucinous Lesions of the Appendix.

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are a rare and heterogeneous group of diseases with challenging clinical management decisions. They account for less than 1% of all cancers but their incidence is on the rise. Treatment is based on their stage and histology. Appendiceal neoplasms frequently metastasize inside the abdomen; this leads to tumor cell growth in the abdominal cavity, known as peritoneal carcinomatosis, and buildup of mucinous material, known as pseudomyxoma peritonei. While low-grade, early-stage tumors can be effectively treated with limited surgical resection, patients with low-grade, advanced-stage disease require peritoneal debulking and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Therapeutic options for high-grade, advanced-stage mucinous tumors of the appendix have not been well established. Debulking surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy preceded and/or followed by systemic chemotherapy has been utilized based on some prospective but not randomized data. We present a case of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Preoperative chemotherapy provided a favorable histologic response by converting initial mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma histology to a high-grade mucinous appendiceal neoplasm.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies - An evidence-based review.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) were considered terminal diseases because of their advanced nature, therefore, systemic chemotherapy was given with palliative intent only. As a result, very poor survival outcomes were observed. But with the introduction of complete Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), the scenario has changed dramatically. METHODOLOGY: An objective electronic database search was performed in Pubmed, NLM Catalog, Google scholar, Bookshelf, and Pubmed Central published in the time period from 2000 till 2020. All the randomized studies were included. In the absence of randomized studies, both prospective and retrospective studies were included. The outcomes of HIPEC were measured in terms of median survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, complications and drug toxicities. RESULTS: CRS and HIPEC are considered the standard of care for PMP and MPM even in the absence of level 1 evidence due to lack of an effective alternative treatment. In colorectal and gastric cancer, several phase-three trials are showing overall survival benefit in selected cases while there is a prophylactic and palliative role of HIPEC in gastric cancer. Three reported phase 3 trials showed positive results in ovarian cancer. In peritoneal sarcomatosis, the role of HIPEC is yet to be proven. CONCLUSION: The patient selection is the key to the successful outcomes after HIPEC. HIPEC should be performed by the experienced surgeons in specialized centres with a strong critical care and intensive care support to reduce the morbidity and mortality. Ongoing trials and future directions will prove to be an indispensable arm in the oncological armamentarium.

Direct surgery with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer, but there is little scientific evidence for this approach. This study aimed to study survival in patients treated with direct surgery with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC), i.e. without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with histopathologically confirmed peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer that underwent first-time CRS-HIPEC with complete cytoreduction (CC0 or 1) at Karolinska University Hospital 2012-2019 were included. Patients with synchronous extraperitoneal metastases were excluded if not treated before end of follow-up. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models. The multivariable models were adjusted for sex, age, synchronous/metachronous peritoneal metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), extraperitoneal metastases and the pathological tumor (T) and lymph node (N) stage of the primary tumor. RESULTS: In all, 131 patients underwent complete CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal metastases without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median OS and DFS were 40.3 months and 12.5 months, respectively, in patients treated with direct surgery. In the multivariable model, PCI≥16 was the only variable associated with decreased OS, whereas elevated PCI, metachronous development of peritoneal metastases and synchronous extraperitoneal metastases were associated with decreased DFS. Age was not associated with an impaired prognosis. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent direct surgery with CRS-HIPEC had a good prognosis, with a median OS of more than 3 years. The results from this study question the need of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in all patients eligible for CRS-HIPEC.

Perioperative outcomes of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in elderly women with epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of a prospective registry.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative outcomes in elderly versus non-elderly women with advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: A single-institution prospective registry was analyzed for women with ovarian cancer who underwent surgery with HIPEC from January 2014 to December 2020. Elderly age was defined as ≥65 years at surgery. Complications were defined according to the Accordion scale. Univariate and multivariable analysis was used to compare progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 127 women who underwent surgery with HIPEC, 33.1% (n=42) were ≥65 and 17.3% (n=22) were ≥70 years old. The median age for non-elderly and elderly patients were 55.7±8.3 versus 72.0±5.4 years, respectively (p<0.001). The majority of non-elderly versus elderly patients underwent HIPEC at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (52.9% vs 73.8%, p=0.024). There were no differences in moderate (15.3% vs 26.2%) or severe postoperative complications (10.6% vs 11.9%, p=0.08), acute kidney injury (7.1% vs 16.7%, p=0.12), and length of stay (5.0 vs 5.0 days, p=0.56) for non-elderly versus elderly patients. With a median follow-up of 20 months (95% CI 9.1 to 32.7 months), there was no difference in progression-free survival (18.8 vs 15.7 months, p=0.75) or overall survival (61.6 months vs not estimable, p=0.72) for non-elderly versus elderly patients. Comparing patients 65-69 versus ≥70 years, progression-free survival (33.0 vs 12.5 months, p=0.002) was significantly improved in patients aged 65-69, without difference in overall survival (not estimable vs 36.0 months, p=0.91). On multivariable analysis, age ≥65 did not impact progression-free survival (p=0.74). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective registry of women with ovarian cancer, perioperative morbidity is not increased for non-elderly versus elderly patients following surgery with HIPEC. While age should not exclude patients from surgery with HIPEC, additional research is needed regarding oncologic benefits in elderly women.

Secondary Cytoreduction and Carboplatin Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An MSK Team Ovary Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer during secondary cytoreductive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were intraoperatively randomly assigned to carboplatin HIPEC (800 mg/m2 for 90 minutes) or no HIPEC, followed by five or six cycles of postoperative IV carboplatin-based chemotherapy, respectively. Based on a binomial single-stage pick-the-winner design, an arm was considered winner if ≥ 17 of 49 patients were without disease progression at 24 months post-surgery. Secondary objectives included postoperative toxicity and HIPEC pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Of 98 patients, 49 (50%) received HIPEC. Complete gross resection was achieved in 82% of the HIPEC patients and 94% of the standard-arm patients. Bowel resection was performed in 37% of patients in the HIPEC arm compared with 65% in the standard (P = .008). There was no perioperative mortality and no difference in use of ostomies, length of stay, or postoperative toxicity. At 24 months, eight patients (16.3%; 1-sided 90% CI, 9.7 to 100) were without progression or death in the HIPEC arm and 12 (24.5%; 1-sided 90% CI, 16.5 to 100) in the standard arm. With a medium follow-up of 39.5 months, 82 patients progressed and 37 died. The median progression-free survival in the HIPEC and standard arms were 12.3 and 15.7 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1 to 2.37; P = .05). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (52.5 v 59.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.67; P = .31). These analyses were exploratory. CONCLUSION: HIPEC with carboplatin was well tolerated but did not result in superior clinical outcomes. This study does not support the use of HIPEC with carboplatin during secondary cytoreductive surgery for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Prognostic impact of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: gastric cancer patients frequently develop peritoneal metastases (PM) with a poor long-term prognosis. A solid body of evidence underlines the beneficial role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on survival, but to date, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal strategy in the treatment of locally advanced primary tumors with or without peritoneal metastasis. The present meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of CRS + HIPEC on survival analyzing the results of randomized studies only. METHODS: A systematic review of articles was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Twelve studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. RESULTS: A survival benefit for patients treated with CRS + HIPEC at all time points was highlighted. However, difference in survival was significant at all time points for patients treated for prophylaxis of PM, but no difference was found when considering resection with a curative intent. The 1, 2, 3 and 5-year survival rates (SR) for patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC were 86.9%, 70.5%, 63.7% and 55.7% respectively. CRS + HIPEC for the treatment rather than prophylaxis of PM was the only predictor of a reduced 3y SR. CONCLUSIONS: CRS + HIPEC may lead to improved prognosis for patients suffering from locally advanced gastric cancer in both prophylactic and curative settings. However, due to far from negligible postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, a strict patient selection is crucial to achieve the best results. The presence of extraperitoneal disease strongly limits the indication of this kind of surgery.

Feasibility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer during COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions on patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated ovarian cancer patients who underwent HIPEC following complete cytoreductive surgery performed during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in three different centers specializing in gynecological oncology. All patients who underwent cytoreduction plus HIPEC for a primary, interval, and recurrent surgery were evaluated. Primary outcomes was postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcome was infection of patient and/or related staff with COVID-19 during the perioperative or early postoperative period. RESULTS: We performed a total of 35 HIPEC procedures during the pandemic: 15 (42.9%) patients underwent primary/interval surgery, while 20 (57.1%) patients had recurrent disease. Grade 3-4 complications occurred in one patient (2.9%) (chronic renal failure), while mortality did not occur in any patient. Neither the patients nor related staff were infected with the coronavirus during the perioperative or early postoperative period. One patient, who was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia on postoperative day 80 died from the infection. Another patient died on postoperative day 85 due to progressive ovarian cancer, a disorder in vital functions, and organ failure. CONCLUSION: HIPEC during the COVID-19 pandemic seems a safe and feasible procedure, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Careful selection of patients is important and precautions should be taken before the procedure.