Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mar Drugs ; 21(12)2023 Nov 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38132926

RESUMEN

Chitin/chitosan and collagen are two of the most important bioactive compounds, with applications in the pharmaceutical, veterinary, nutraceutical, cosmetic, biomaterials, and other industries. When extracted from non-edible parts of fish and shellfish, by-catches, and invasive species, their use contributes to a more sustainable and circular economy. The present article reviews the scientific knowledge and publication trends along the marine chitin/chitosan and collagen value chains and assesses how researchers, industry players, and end-users can bridge the gap between scientific understanding and industrial applications. Overall, research on chitin/chitosan remains focused on the compound itself rather than its market applications. Still, chitin/chitosan use is expected to increase in food and biomedical applications, while that of collagen is expected to increase in biomedical, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and nutritional applications. Sustainable practices, such as the reuse of waste materials, contribute to strengthen both value chains; the identified weaknesses include the lack of studies considering market trends, social sustainability, and profitability, as well as insufficient examination of intellectual property rights. Government regulations, market demand, consumer preferences, technological advancements, environmental challenges, and legal frameworks play significant roles in shaping both value chains. Addressing these factors is crucial for seizing opportunities, fostering sustainability, complying with regulations, and maintaining competitiveness in these constantly evolving value chains.


Asunto(s)
Quitina , Quitosano , Colágeno , Animales , Materiales Biocompatibles/economía , Quitina/economía , Quitosano/economía , Cosméticos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Mariscos , Colágeno/economía
2.
Braz. j. biol ; 83: 1-8, 2023. ilus, graf, tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1468881

RESUMEN

Chitin and its derived products have immense economic value due to their vital role in various biological activities as well as biomedical and industrial application. Insects, microorganism and crustaceans are the main supply of chitin but the crustaceans shell like shrimp, krill, lobsters and crabs are the main commercial sources. Chitin content of an individual varies depending on the structures possessing the polymer and the species. In this study edible crabs’ shells (Callinectes sapidus) were demineralized and deproteinized resulting in 13.8% (dry weight) chitin recovery from chitin wastes. FTIR and XRD analyses of the experimental crude as well as purified chitins revealed that both were much comparable to the commercially purchased controls. The acid pretreatment ceded 54g of colloidal chitin that resulted in 1080% of the crude chitin. The colloidal chitin was exploited for isolation of eighty five chitinolytic bacterial isolates from different sources. Zone of clearance was displayed by the thirty five isolates (41.17%) succeeding their growth at pH 7 on colloidal chitin agar medium. Maximum chitinolytic activity i.e. 301.55 U/ml was exhibited by isolate JF70 when cultivated in extracted chitin containing both carbon and nitrogen. The study showed wastes of blue crabs can be utilized for extraction of chitin and isolation of chitinolytic bacteria that can be used to degrade chitin waste, resolve environmental pollution as well as industrial purpose.


A quitina e seus produtos derivados têm imenso valor econômico devido ao seu papel vital em várias atividades biológicas, bem como em aplicações biomédicas e industriais. Insetos, microrganismos e crustáceos são o principal suprimento de quitina, mas a casca dos crustáceos como camarão, krill, lagosta e caranguejo são as principais fontes comerciais. O conteúdo de quitina de um indivíduo varia dependendo das estruturas que possuem o polímero e da espécie. Neste estudo, as cascas de caranguejos comestíveis (Callinectes sapidus) foram desmineralizadas e desproteinizadas, resultando em 13,8% (peso seco) de recuperação de quitina a partir de resíduos de quitina. As análises de FTIR e XRD do bruto experimental, bem como das quitinas purificadas, revelaram que ambas eram muito comparáveis aos controles adquiridos comercialmente. O pré-tratamento com ácido cedeu 54 g de quitina coloidal que resultou em 1.080% da quitina bruta. A quitina coloidal foi analisada para isolamento de 85 isolados bacterianos quitinolíticos de diferentes fontes. A zona de eliminação foi exibida pelos 35 isolados (41,17%) que sucederam seu crescimento a pH 7 em meio de ágar de quitina coloidal. A atividade quitinolítica máxima, ou seja, 301,55 U / ml, foi exibida pelo isolado JF70 quando cultivado em quitina extraída contendo carbono e nitrogênio. O estudo mostrou que resíduos de caranguejos azuis podem ser utilizados para extração de quitina e isolamento de bactérias quitinolíticas que podem ser usadas para degradar resíduos de quitina, resolver a poluição ambiental e também para fins industriais.


Asunto(s)
Quitina/análisis , Quitina/economía , Quitina/aislamiento & purificación , Quitinasas
4.
Burns ; 27(7): 759-61, 2001 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11600257

RESUMEN

The effect of Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan) on skin donor site healing was compared with the standard skin donor site dressing Kaltostat (calcium sodium alginate) in 35 burn patients with 70 skin donor sites prospectively. The median time of wound healing for the Hyphecan group was 12 days with an average of 13.1+/-4.0 days (ranged from 9 to 28 days) while the Kaltostat group had a median healing time of 12 days (ranged from 8 to 28 days) with a mean of 13.0+/-4.1 days. The difference in healing time between these two groups was statistically insignificant with a P-value of 0.95. The infection rate was 2.9% for both Hyphecan and Kaltostat. These 35 patients had been followed up from 10 to 16 months and no difference in long-term donor site morbidity between Hyphecan and Kaltostat had been observed. This finding was encouraging because the cost of Hyphecan is less than 50% of Kaltostat and it may be worthwhile to explore the clinical application of Hyphecan in other area of burns treatment.


Asunto(s)
Quitina/análogos & derivados , Quitina/uso terapéutico , Apósitos Oclusivos , Trasplante de Piel/métodos , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alginatos/uso terapéutico , Materiales Biocompatibles/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Quitina/economía , Femenino , Ácido Glucurónico , Ácidos Hexurónicos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Trasplante de Piel/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...