Percutaneous iliosacral screw and trans-iliac trans-sacral screw with single C-arm fluoroscope intensifier is a safe treatment for pelvic ring injuries.

To elucidate the accuracy, efficacy, and safety of percutaneous iliosacral screw (ISS) and trans-iliac trans-sacral screw (TITS) insertion using a single C-arm fluoroscopy intensifier. Additionally, the potential risk factors that might cause mal-positioned screws were identified. Patients with pelvic ring injuries who underwent percutaneous screw fixation in a single medical institute were divided into an ISS group (n = 59) and a TITS group (n = 62) and assessed. The angles deviated from ideal orientation (ADIO) of the implanted screw were measured, and potential risk factors for mal-positioned screws were analyzed. Overall, the reduction quality of the pelvic ring was good or excellent in 70 patients (82.4%) by Matta's criteria and in 48 patients (56.5%) by Lefaivre's criteria. ADIO measurements of the ISS and TITS groups via multi-planar computed tomography were 9.16° ± 6.97° and 3.09° ± 2.8° in the axial view, respectively, and 5.92° ± 3.65° and 2.10° ± 2.01° in the coronal view, respectively. Univariate statistical analysis revealed body mass index as the single potential risk factor of mal-positioned screws. With careful preoperative planning and intraoperative preparations, placing ISS and TITS under the guidance of single C-arm fluoroscopy intensifier is a reliable and safe technique. Caution should be exercised when performing this procedure in patients with a high body mass index.

The use of digital magnification to reduce radiation dose in the cardiac catheter laboratory.

OBJECTIVES: To audit whether using magnification of images by use of a large viewing screen using digital matrix magnification which enlarges the image by 33% without using the X-ray machine zoom magnification protocols on a Siemens Artis Zee X-ray machine in a cardiac catheter laboratory results in a reduction of kerma-area product (KAP) for both diagnostic and interventional procedures. This reduction was predicted in an in vitro study in our laboratory, which has previously shown a 20.4% reduction in KAP. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of the radiation exposure to compare the measured KAP recorded during the period when conventional magnification with automatic brightness and dose control was used on a Siemens Artis Zee X-ray machine with a flat panel detector and when magnification settings were avoided by using a large screen to enlarge and project a non-magnified image by digital magnification. The analysis was carried out for patients having a diagnostic coronary angiogram and those having an interventional coronary procedure. RESULTS: For diagnostic coronary angiograms the median KAP per procedure in the period using conventional magnification was 2124.5 µGy.m2 compared to 1401 µGy.m2 when image matrix magnification was used, a 34% reduction (p < 0.0001). For interventional coronary procedures, the median KAP per procedure in the period using conventional magnification was 3791 µGy.m2 compared to 2568.5 µGy.m2 when image matrix magnification was used, a 32% reduction (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Avoiding using conventional magnification in the cardiac catheter laboratory and using a large screen to magnify images was associated with a statistically significant greater than 30% reduction in KAP. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This paper is the proof in clinical practice of a theoretical conclusion that radiation dose (KAP) is reduced by use of Image matrix magnification using a large viewing screen without the need to use X-ray tube magnification without significant loss of image resolution in interventional cardiology. The same approach will be useful in interventional radiology.

The Role of Physician-Driven Device Preference in the Cost Variation of Common Interventional Radiology Procedures.

PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of physician-specific equipment preference on cost variation for procedures typically performed by interventional radiologists at a tertiary care academic hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2017 to October 2019, data on all expendable items used by 9 interventional radiologists for 11 common interventional radiology procedure categories were compiled from the hospital analytics system. This search yielded a final dataset of 44,654 items used in 2,121 procedures of 11 different categories. The mean cost per case for each physician as well as the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV) of the mean cost per case across physicians were calculated. The proportion of spending by item type was compared across physicians for 2 high-variation, high-volume procedures. The relationship between the mean cost per case and case volume was examined using linear regression. RESULTS: There was a high variability within each procedure, with the highest and the lowest CV for radioembolization administration (56.6%) and transjugular liver biopsy (4.9%), respectively. Variation in transarterial chemoembolization cost was mainly driven by microcatheters/microwires, while for nephrostomy, the main drivers were catheters/wires and access sets. Mean spending by physician was not significantly correlated with case volume (P =.584). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians vary in their item selection even for standard procedures. While the financial impact of these differences vary across procedures, these findings suggest that standardization may offer an opportunity for cost savings.

Improving IR Ergonomics Using a Flexible C-Arm System.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a versatile flexible ceiling-mounted C-arm on active table and gantry repositioning during interventions and its effect on operator discomfort, system usability, and patient safety compared with a traditional ceiling-mounted system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 100 IR procedures studied: 50 in a traditional IR system (standard group) and 50 with a novel multiaxis ceiling-mounted system (test group). FlexArm was capable of multiple gantry rotation points allowing increased access to the patient in addition to 236 cm of lateral x-ray detector travel. For each procedure, both the table and the gantry repositioning were measured. Patient safety, patient/equipment repositioning effort, and physical discomfort were evaluated through an operator survey. RESULTS: Table repositioning was reduced from 42 to 16 instances per procedure (P < .001) in the test group compared with the standard group. The operators perceived less table and gantry repositioning effort (P < .0001) and decreased risks of equipment collisions, displacement of vascular access, and dislodgment of tubes/lines with the test group (P < .0001). Operator discomfort was reduced for all body areas in the test group over the standard group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The FlexArm system geometry enhances operator ergonomics, as there was a decrease need to move the table, leading to a perceived decrease in patient risk and decrease operator physical discomfort when compared to a traditional imaging system.

CT Fluoroscopy for Image-Guided Procedures: Physician Radiation Dose During Full-Rotation and Partial-Angle CT Scanning.

PURPOSE: To determine physician radiation exposure when using partial-angle computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy (PACT) vs conventional full-rotation CT and whether there is an optimal tube/detector position at which physician dose is minimized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physician radiation dose (entrance air kerma) was measured for full-rotation CT (360°) and PACT (240°) at all tube/detector positions using a human-mimicking phantom placed in a 64-channel multidetector CT. Parameters included 120 kV, 20- and 40-mm collimation, and 100 mA. The mean, standard deviation, and increase/decrease in physician dose compared with a full-rotation scan were reported. RESULTS: Physician radiation exposure during CT fluoroscopy with PACT was highly dependent on the position of the tube/detector during scanning. The lowest PACT physician dose was when the physician was on the detector side (center view angle 116°; -35% decreased dose vs full-angle CT). The highest PACT physician dose was with the physician on the tube side (center view angle 298°; +34% increased dose vs full-angle CT), all doses P <.05 vs full-rotation CT. CONCLUSIONS: Partial-angle CT has the potential to both significantly increase or decrease physician radiation dose during CT fluoroscopy-guided procedures. The detector/tube position has a profound effect on physician dose. The lowest dose during PACT was achieved when the physician was located on the detector side (ie, distant from the tube). This data could be used to optimize CT fluoroscopy parameters to reduce physician radiation exposure for PACT-capable scanners.

Fusion Imaging with a Mobile C-Arm for Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Fusion imaging makes it possible to improve endovascular procedures and is mainly used in hybrid rooms for aortic procedures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of fusion imaging for femoropopliteal endovascular procedures with a mobile flat plane sensor and dedicated software to assist endovascular navigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May and December 2017, 41 patients requiring femoropopliteal endovascular revascularization were included. Interventions were carried out in a conventional surgical room equipped with a mobile plane sensor (Cios Alpha, Siemens). The numerical video stream was transmitted to an angionavigation station (EndoNaut (EN), Therenva). The software created an osseous and arterial panorama of the treated limb from the angiographies carried out at the beginning of procedure. After each displacement of the table, the software relocated the current image on the osseous panorama, with 2D-2D resetting, and amalgamated the mask of the arterial panorama. The success rates of creation of osseous and arterial panorama and the success of relocation were evaluated. The data concerning irradiation, the volume of contrast (VC) injected, and operative times were recorded. RESULTS: Osseous panoramas could be automatically generated for the 41 procedures, without manual adjustment in 33 cases (80.5%). About 35 relocations based on a 2D-2D resetting could be obtained in the 41 procedures, with a success rate of 85%. The causes of failure were a change in table height or arch angulation. The average duration of intervention was 74.5 min. The irradiation parameters were duration of fluoroscopy 17.8 ± 13.1 min, air kerma 80.5 ± 68.4 mGy, and dose area product 2140 ± 1599 µGy m2. The average VC was 24.5 ± 14 mL. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study showed that fusion imaging is possible in a nonhybrid room for peripheral procedures. Imagery of mobile C-arms can be improved for femoropopliteal endovascular procedures without heavy equipment. These imagery tools bring an operative comfort and could probably reduce irradiation and the injected VC. The clinical benefit must be evaluated in more patients in a randomized comparative study with a rigorous methodology.

Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for common orthopaedic procedures using the mini C-arm fluoroscope.

OBJECTIVE: Mini C-arm fluoroscopes are widely used by orthopaedic surgeons for intraoperative image guidance without the need for radiographers. This puts the responsibility for radiation exposure firmly with the operating surgeon. In order to maintain safe and best practice under U.K. Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations, one must limit radiation exposure and audit performance using national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). In the case of the mini C-arm, there are no national DRLs. IR(ME)R, therefore, require the establishment of local DRLs by each hospital to act as an alternative guideline for safe radiation use. The aim of our audit was to establish local DRLs based on our experience operating with the use of the mini C-arm over the last 7 years. METHODS: This retrospective audit evaluates the end dose-area product (DAP) recorded for common trauma and orthopaedic procedures using the mini C-arm in a busy district general hospital.We present the quartile data and have set the cut-off point as the third quartile for formulating the local DRLs, consistent with the methodology for the conventional fluoroscope. RESULTS: For our data set (n = 1664), the third quartile DAP values were lowest for surgeries to the forearm (5.38 cGycm2), hand (7.62 cGycm2), and foot/ankle (8.56 cGycm2), and highest for wrist (10.64 cGycm2) and elbow (14.61 cGycm2) procedures. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To our knowledge, this is the largest data set used to establish local DRLs. Other centres may find our guidelines useful whilst they establish their own local DRLs.

Prostatic Artery Embolization: Equipment, Procedure Steps, and Overcoming Technical Challenges.

In the last decade, prostatic artery embolization (PAE) established itself as a safe and effective treatment option for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attributed to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), with reproducible results across multiple centers and endorsement by important international societies. However, PAE is also known to be a technically demanding procedure. Accompanying the prevalence of benign prostate hyperplasia, the procedure is usually performed in older patients, in whom atherosclerosis and comorbidities are common features. Also, prostatic vascular anatomy is described to be complex and variable, and pelvic structures are deeply interconnected by anastomosis. Thus, PAE demands a deep familiarization with materials and devices, intraprocedure imaging techniques, microcatetherization skills and with the pelvic vascular anatomy. Especially in the beginning of the learning curve, the procedure can be time-consuming and related to high radiation exposure for both medical team and the patient. In this article, the main points of technical concern during PAE are described and discussed, such as the equipment needed, the effect of different embolic materials, patient's preparation for the procedure, arterial access sites, identifying and catheterizing the prostatic arteries, the embolization techniques, among others. Finally, the most frequent technical challenges are presented, and the possible strategies to overcome them are exemplified and discussed.

Feasibility of Augmented Reality-Guided Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

PURPOSE: To investigate an augmented reality (AR)-guided endovascular puncture to facilitate successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An AR navigation system for TIPS was designed. Three-dimensional (3D) liver models including portal and hepatic vein anatomy were extracted from preoperative CT images. The 3D models, intraoperative subjects, and electromagnetic tracking information of the puncture needles were integrated through the system calibration. In the AR head-mounted display, the 3D models were overlaid on the subjects, which was a liver phantom in the first phase and live beagle dogs in the second phase. One life-size liver phantom and 9 beagle dogs were used in the experiments. Imaging after puncture was performed to validate whether the needle tip accessed the target hepatic vein successfully. RESULTS: Endovascular punctures of the portal vein of the liver phantom were repeated 30 times under the guidance of the AR system, and the puncture needle successfully accessed the target vein during each attempt. In the experiments of live canine subjects, the punctures were successful in 2 attempts in 7 beagle dogs and in 1 attempt in the remaining 2 dogs. The puncture time of needle from hepatic vein to portal vein was 5-10 s in the phantom experiments and 10-30 s in the canine experiments. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of AR-based navigation facilitating accurate and successful portal vein access in preclinical models of TIPS was validated.

Endobronchial Navigation Guided by Cone-Beam CT-Based Augmented Fluoroscopy without a Bronchoscope: Feasibility Study in Phantom and Swine.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CT)-based augmented fluoroscopy (AF) image guidance for endobronchial navigation to peripheral lung targets. METHODS: Prototypic endobronchial navigation AF software that superimposed segmented airways, targets, and pathways based on cone-beam CT onto fluoroscopy images was evaluated ex vivo in fixed swine lungs and in vivo in healthy swine (n = 4) without a bronchoscope. Ex vivo and in vivo (n = 3) phase 1 experiments used guide catheters and AF software version 1, whereas in vivo phase 2 (n = 1) experiments also used an endovascular steerable guiding sheath, upgraded AF software version 2, and lung-specific low-radiation-dose protocols. First-pass navigation success was defined as catheter delivery into a targeted airway segment solely using AF, with second-pass success defined as reaching the targeted segment by using updated AF image guidance based on confirmatory cone-beam CT. Secondary outcomes were navigation error, navigation time, radiation exposure, and preliminary safety. RESULTS: First-pass success was 100% (10/10) ex vivo and 19/24 (79%) and 11/15 (73%) for in vivo phases 1 and 2, respectively. Phase 2 second-pass success was 4/4 (100%). Navigation errors were 2.2 ± 1.2 mm ex vivo and 4.9 ± 3.2 mm and 4.0 ± 2.6 mm for in vivo phases 1 and 2, respectively. No major device-related complications were observed in the in vivo experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Endobronchial navigation is feasible and accurate with cone-beam CT-based AF image guidance. AF can guide endobronchial navigation with endovascular catheters and steerable guiding sheaths to peripheral lung targets, potentially overcoming limitations associated with bronchoscopy.

Endovascular Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Performed in a Hybrid Operating Room Versus Conventional Operating Room Using a C-Arm.

BACKGROUND: To compare contrast usage and radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using mobile C-arm imaging in a conventional operating room (OR) or fixed angiographic equipment in a hybrid OR (HR). METHODS: A retrospective unicenter study from May 2016 to August 2019. All consecutive patients undergoing standard EVAR were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group OR included EVARs performed in a conventional OR with a mobile C-arm (May 2016 to April 2018) and group HR included EVARs performed with a fixed angiographic equipment in an HR (May 2018 to August 2019). Data collected included patient demographics, aneurysm diameter, neck length, radiation dose: median dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, total operative time, contrast use, and 30-day clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included in the study (42 patients in group OR and 35 patients in group HR). There was no difference in age, body mass index (BMI), mean aneurysm, and neck length between groups. Patients in the group HR received less contrast volume (108.6 mL [±41.5] vs. 162.5 mL [±52.6]; P < 0.001), but higher radiation dose (154 Gy cm2 [±102.9] vs. 61.5 Gy cm2 [±42.4]; P < 0.001). There were no differences in fluoroscopy time (20.4 min [±8.5] vs. 23.2 min [±12.4]; P = 0.274) and total operative time (106.4 [±22.3] vs. 109.4 [±25.8]; P = 0.798). No difference was found in terms of 30-day complication rates or operative mortality between groups. DAP was positively correlated with BMI in the group OR (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient rs, 0.580; P < 0.001), but no correlation could be seen in the group HR (rs, 0.408; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Routine EVAR performed in a hybrid fixed-imaging suite may be associated with less contrast usage, but higher radiation exposure in our center. The significantly higher radiation exposure when the mobile C-arm is replaced by an HR should not be underestimated.

3D-printed face protective shield in interventional radiology: Evaluation of an immediate solution in the era of COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the clinical evaluation of a 3D-printed protective face shield designed to protect interventional radiologists from droplet transmission of the SARS-Cov-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A protective face shield consisting in a standard transparent polymerizing vinyl chloride (PVC) sheet was built using commercially available 3D printers. The 3D-printed face shield was evaluated in 31 interventional procedures in terms of ability to perform the assigned intervention as usual, quality of visual comfort and tolerance using a Likert scale (from 1, as very good to 5, as extremely poor). RESULTS: The mean rating for ability to perform the assigned intervention as usual was 1.7±0.8 (SD) (range: 1-4). The mean visual tolerance rating was 1.6±0.7 (SD) (range: 1-4). The mean tolerability rating was 1.4±0.7 (SD) (range: 1-3). CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed protective face shield is well accepted in various interventions. It may become an additional option for protection of interventional radiologists.

Contemporary postoperative imaging practices among pediatric surgeons for image-guided central venous line placement: A survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Rare life-threatening complications after central venous line (CVL) placement in children may encourage the routine use of postoperative imaging, despite multiple studies demonstrating the limited utility of this practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of this discordance. METHODS: A 10-question survey was sent to 1,239 members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) addressing contemporary practices regarding CVL placement and postoperative imaging. RESULTS: Five hundred eighteen (42%) surveys were completed. The majority of respondents routinely obtain a chest radiograph (CXR) after image-guided CVL placement (52%). Years in practice, operative volume, and practice type were not statistically associated with postoperative CXR usage (all p > 0.05). 'Routine' users were more likely to cite "standard of care" (p < 0.001), position verification (p < 0.001), and complication identification (p < 0.001) as indications for use than those who use CXR selectively. CONCLUSION: Routine use of postoperative CXR after image-guided CVL placement remains common among pediatric surgeons. Significant variation exists in the indication for this study, with considerable disagreement between 'selective' and 'routine' users. Consideration should be given for an APSA standardized guideline utilizing a clinically-driven approach to CVL placement and postoperative imaging to align with evidence-based practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A - descriptive analysis of survey results.

Comparing Mobile C-Arm with a Hybrid Operating Room for Imaging in Fenestrated Stent-Graft Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the advantages of a hybrid operating room (OR) (group 2) compared with a fluoroscopic mobile C-arm (group 1) during fenestrated stent-graft endovascular aneurysm repair (f-EVAR). METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of consecutive patients treated with f-EVAR for short-necked, juxtarenal, and suprarenal aortic aneurysms between January 2006 and July 2016. Primary end points were technical success and perioperative complications. Secondary end points included 30-day and 1-year mortality as well as target vessel patency. RESULTS: About 96 patients were treated (85 men; 74.1 ± 6.3 years); 46 patients (48%) belonging to group 1 and 50 (52%) patients belonging to group 2. Technical success was achieved in 92.7% of the procedures (group 1 91.3% vs. group 2 94%, P = 0.72). Significantly more complex interventions were performed in group 2 (n = 38 of 50) compared with group 1 (n = 14 of 46; P < 0.001), in which primarily renal f-EVAR interventions were performed. In group 2, significantly less contrast was used (median 150 mL vs. 100 mL; P < 0.001). The 30-day mortality in group 1 was 9% and 2% in group 2 (P = 0.14), and 1-year survival was also not significantly different between both groups. Target visceral vessel primary patency was significantly higher in group 1 (87.6% vs. 85.5% [P = 0.006] and 83.8% vs. 78.3% [P = 0.03]) at 6 and 12 months, respectively). There was no significant difference in renal artery primary patency at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate and 1-year outcomes after f-EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm were comparable using a hybrid OR compared with a mobile C-arm, despite the use of significantly more complex stent grafts in the patients treated in the hybrid OR. The use of a hybrid OR may assist in achieving satisfying results in complex f-EVAR.

Surgically placed radiopaque markers: Proof-of-concept of a novel technique to facilitate percutaneous interventions in neonates and infants.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and benefit of self-designed, radiopaque markers as a novel technique in neonates and infants with shunt- or duct-dependent lesions. BACKGROUND: Surgically placed radiopaque markers have the potential to facilitate postoperative percutaneous interventions. METHODS: All consecutive children with surgically placed radiopaque markers involving systemic-to-pulmonary artery connections or arterial ducts in the context of hybrid palliation and subsequent cardiac catheterization between January 2013 and March 2019 were included in this analysis. Our primary endpoint was our concept's feasibility, which we defined as a combination of surgical feasibility and the percutaneous intervention's success. Secondary endpoint was the rate of complications resulting from the surgical procedure or during catheterization. RESULTS: Radiopaque markers that reveal the proximal entry of a surgical shunt or the arterial duct proved to be a feasible and beneficial approach in 25 postoperative catheterizations. The markers' high accuracy enabled easy probing and proper stent positioning in 13 neonates with a median age and weight of 121 days (range 9-356) and 4.7 kg (1.6-9.4) at the intervention. No procedural complications or unanticipated events associated with the radiopaque marker occurred. The markers were never lost, never migrated, and caused no local obstructive lesion. Surgical removal was straightforward in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Radiopaque markers are a promising and refined technique to substantially facilitate target vessel access and enabling the accurate positioning of stents during postoperative percutaneous procedures.

Food and Drug Administration's Perspective on Medical Devices Intended for Weight Loss: A Guide for the Interventional Radiologist.

Medical devices can help patients lose weight. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health is responsible for assuring the safety and effectiveness of devices used for weight loss. Interventional radiologists may conduct clinical studies of devices for weight loss, such as embolization beads to stop blood flow to gastric arteries or cryoablation systems to ablate metabolism-linked nerves. The purposes of this paper are (1) to clarify the FDA's role providing regulatory oversight of clinical studies of medical devices; (2) to explain how to engage with the FDA; and (3) to provide information on the design of clinical studies intended to support a weight loss indication. In particular, Investigational Device Exemptions (IDEs) are needed for significant risk studies for new devices, or for off-label use of legally marketed devices. The FDA is available through the Pre-Submission process to assist when determining if a study requires an IDE, and to discuss plans for submitting an IDE. The FDA works with medical device manufacturers and clinical researchers who want to bring novel weight-loss devices to market.

Reduction of Radiation Dose and Scanning Time While Preserving Diagnostic Yield: A Comparison of Battery-Powered and Manual Bone Biopsy Systems.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is scarcity of data on the comparative efficacy between bone biopsy drill systems across various types of bone lesions. Our aim was to investigate differences in diagnostic yield, scanning time, and radiation dose between manual and battery-powered bone biopsy systems in CT-guided biopsies of lytic, sclerotic, and infectious bone lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center institutional review board-approved study. A total of 585 CT-guided core needle biopsies were performed at 1 institution from May 2010 to February 2019. Classification of bone lesions, location, bone biopsy system, suspected origin of primary disease, final pathologic diagnosis, diagnostic yield, presence of crush artifacts, radiation dose, and scanning times were collected. For the battery-powered system, OnControl was used. For the manual drill system, Bonopty, Osteo-site, and Laurane drill systems were used. Comparisons in lytic and sclerotic lesions and suspected discitis/osteomyelitis were made using the Fisher exact test. Subgroup analysis of the drill systems for scanning time and radiation dose was performed by 1-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Our patient cohorts consisted of a total of 585 patients with 422 lytic, 110 sclerotic, and 53 suspected infectious lesions. The mean age was 62 ± 13 years with a male/female ratio of 305:280 for all lesions. The diagnostic yield was 85.5% (362/422) for lytic, 82.7% (91/110) for sclerotic, 50.9% (27/53) for infectious lesions, and 82.1% (480/585) for all lesions. No statistical difference was found when comparing diagnostic yields of powered drills with the manual systems for lytic, sclerotic, and infectious lesions. However, in a subgroup analysis, radiation dose and scanning time were significantly lower for powered drill compared with manual drill systems in lytic (P = .001 for both) and sclerotic lesions (P = .028 and P = .012, respectively). No significant differences were seen between the drill systems for suspected infectious lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that there was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic yield when comparing battery-powered and manual bone biopsy systems for CT-guided bone biopsies; however, the use of the power drill system resulted in significantly reduced scanning time and radiation dose in lytic and sclerotic lesions.

Potential impacts of a novel integrated extracorporeal-CPR workflow using an interventional radiology and immediate whole-body computed tomography system in the emergency department.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can be associated with increased survival and neurologic benefits in selected patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, there remains insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of ECPR for patients with OHCA. A novel integrated trauma workflow concept that utilizes a sliding computed tomography (CT) scanner and interventional radiology (IR) system, named a hybrid emergency room system (HERS), allowing emergency therapeutic interventions and CT examination without relocating trauma patients, has recently evolved in Japan. HERS can drastically shorten the ECPR implementation time and more quickly facilitate definitive interventions than the conventional advanced cardiovascular life support workflow. Herein, we discuss our novel workflow concept using HERS on ECPR for patients with OHCA.

A new option using adjunctive microsheath angiography to increase the safety during percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (PEVAR) is widespread for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The purpose of this study was to present outcomes of PEVAR using simultaneous angiography via microsheath. METHODS: There were 100 punctures in 50 patients undergoing PEVAR for AAA. All cases used the ProGlide closure device (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for PEVAR, and another puncture with microsheath placed on the common femoral artery for a second insertion point of the ProGlide. Basically, a single ProGlide was used for each puncture in the PEVAR. Hemostasis, stenosis, dissection, and distal embolization were confirmed in angiography via the adjunctive microsheath after removal of the delivery system. Since the PEVAR for AAA requires at least two punctures, this procedure was applied to both sites. Primary outcome was technical success and occurrence rates of access-related complications in PEVAR. Technical success was defined as complete hemostasis without surgical intervention and the need for conversion to general anesthesia. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 98% (98/100) of the cases. Access-related complications on perioperative periods were identified in two cases. One case involved a tip of the microsheath being transected by the ProGlide that led to a distal embolization, which is why a cut down was required to retrieve the tip of the sheath. Another case required a cut down due to persistent hemorrhage from the puncture site of the microsheath. Although persistent hemorrhage was identified in five punctures (5.0%) via the adjunctive microsheath angiography, additional manual compression or ProGlide achieved complete hemostasis. Both stenosis and dissection following PEVAR were not identified in any case. CONCLUSIONS: A supporting angiography via microsheath in confirming the absence of hemorrhage, stenosis, dissection, and distal embolization may be worthwhile to selectively use for cases of PEVAR.