Resolving the brachytherapy challenges with government funded hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to rationalize the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of high dose rate (HDR) cobalt 60 (Co-60) source versus 192-Iridium (192-Ir) source brachytherapy in government funded hospitals and treatment interruption gap because of exchange of sources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of gynecological cancer patients, treated by radiotherapy with curative intent between April 2005 and September 2012 was conducted. We analyzed the total number of patients treated for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (Intracavitary brachytherapy or cylindrical vaginal source). The dates for 192-Ir sources installation and the last date and first date of brachytherapy procedure before and after source installation respectively were also analyzed and calculated the gap in days for brachytherapy interruptions. RESULTS: The study was analyzed the records of 2005 to September 2012 year where eight 192-Ir sources were installed. The mean gap between treatment interruptions was 123.12 days (range 1-647 days). The Institutional incidence of gynecological cancer where radiotherapy was treatment modality (except ovary) is 34.9 percent. Around 52.25 percent of patients who received EBRT at this institute were referred to outside hospital for brachytherapy because of unavailability of Iridium source. The cost for 5 year duration for single cobalt source is approximately 20-22 lakhs while for 15 Iridium sources is approximately 52-53 lakhs. CONCLUSION: The combined HDR Co-60 brachytherapy and EBRT provide a useful modality in the treatment of gynecological cancer where radiotherapy is indicated, the treatment interruption because of source exchange is longer and can be minimized by using cobalt source as it is cost-effective and has 5 year working life. Thus, Co-60 source for brachytherapy is a feasible option for government funded hospitals in developing countries.

Design and characterization of an economical (192)Ir hemi-brain small animal irradiator.

PURPOSE: To describe the design and dosimetric characterization of a simple and economical small animal irradiator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A high dose rate (HDR) (192)Ir brachytherapy source from a commercially available afterloader was used with a 1.3 cm thick tungsten collimator to provide sharp beam penumbra suitable for hemi-brain irradiation of mice. The unit was equipped with continuous gas anesthesia to allow robust animal immobilization. Dosimetric characterization of the device was performed with Gafchromic film measurements. RESULTS: The tungsten collimator provided a sharp penumbra suitable for hemi-brain irradiation, and dose rates on the order of 200 cGy/minute were achieved. The sharpness of the penumbra attainable with this device compares favorably to those measured experimentally for 6 MV photons, and 6 and 20 MeV electron beams from a linear accelerator, and was comparable to those measured for a 300 kVp orthovoltage beam and a Monte Carlo simulated 90 MeV proton beam. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its simplicity and low cost, the apparatus described is an attractive alternative for small animal irradiation experiments requiring steep dose gradients.

[Economic assessment of pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy with optimized dose distribution for cervix carcinoma]. / Evaluation économique de la curiethérapie de débit pulsé gynécologique (PDR) avec optimisation de la dose pour les cancers du col utérin.

PURPOSE: Our study aims at evaluating the cost of pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy with optimized dose distribution versus traditional treatments (iridium wires, cesium, non-optimized PDR). Issues surrounding reimbursement were also explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, non-randomised study conducted in the framework of a project entitled "Support Program for Costly Diagnostic and Therapeutic Innovations" involved 21 hospitals. Patients with cervix carcinoma received either classical brachytherapy or the innovation. The direct medical costs of staff and equipment, as well as the costs of radioactive sources, consumables and building renovation were evaluated from a hospital point of view using a microcosting approach. Subsequent costs per brachytherapy were compared between the four strategies. RESULTS: The economic study included 463 patients over two years. The main resources categories associated with PDR brachytherapy (whether optimized or not) were radioactive sources (1053euro) and source projectors (735euro). Optimized PDR induced higher cost of imagery and dosimetry (respectively 130euro and 367euro) than non-optimized PDR (47euro and 75euro). Extra costs of innovation over the less costly strategy (iridium wires) reached more than 2100euro per treatment, but could be reduced by half in the hypothesis of 40 patients treated per year (instead of 24 in the study). CONCLUSION: Aside from staff, imaging and dosimetry, the current hospital reimbursements largely underestimated the cost of innovation related to equipment and sources.

Comparison of 60cobalt and 192iridium sources in high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: (60)Co sources with dimensions identical to those of (192)Ir have recently been made available in clinical brachytherapy. A longer half time reduces demands on logistics and quality assurance and perhaps costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Comparison of the physical properties of (60)Co and (192)Ir with regard to brachytherapy. RESULTS: Required activities for the same air kerma rate are lower by a factor of 2.8 for (60)Co. Differential absorption in tissues of different densities can be neglected. Monte Carlo calculations demonstrate that integral dose due to radial dose fall off is higher for (192)Ir in comparison to (60)Co within the first 22 cm from the source (normalization at 1 cm). At larger distances this relationship is reversed. CONCLUSION: Clinical examples for intracavitary and interstitial applications however, show practically identical dose distributions in the treatment volume.

A comparison of the expected costs of high dose rate brachytherapy using 252Cf versus 192Ir.

A cost analysis to compare high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy using either californium-252 (252Cf) or 192Ir was performed to determine the prospects of widespread clinical implementation of HDR 252Cf. Interest in the neutron-emitting 252Cf radioisotope as a radiotherapy nuclide has undergone a resurgence given recent efforts to fabricate HDR remotely afterloaded sources, and other efforts to create a miniature source for improved accessibility to a variety of anatomic sites. Therefore, HDR 252Cf brachytherapy may prove to be a potential rival to the use of HDR 192Ir remotely afterloaded brachytherapy--the current standard-of-care treatment modality using HDR brachytherapy. Considering the possible improvements in clinical efficacy using HDR 252Cf brachytherapy and the enormous costs of other high-LET radiation sources, the cost differences between 252Cf and 192Ir may be well-justified.