Sex-differences in psychological readiness for return-to-sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Females are at greatest risk for reinjury after return to sport (RTS) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). The reasons for these sex differences, however, remain unclear. Psychological factors such as kinesiophobia have been identified as a potential predictor for reinjury following RTS. Studies investigating kinesiophobia have identified sex differences, yet whether this holds in the ACLR population remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine whether there are sex differences in kinesiophobia and other psychological factors, such as readiness to RTS and self-reported pain in the ACLR population. A total of 20 participants, eleven males (23.0 ± 8.4 years, 178.9 ± 7.6 cm, 76.8 ± 10.4 kg) and 9 females (19.6 ± 5.3 years, 165.1 ± 4.0 cm, 73.2 ± 25.0 kg) voluntarily participated in this study. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale, and self-reported pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) were administered after clearance for RTS (10.5 ± 2.3 months post-ACLR). Statistical significance was set a priori at p<0.05. A significant difference between sexes was observed for the ACL-RSI with males reporting a significantly higher score (92.82±16.16) compared to females (77.0±15.54; p = 0.040). There were no significant differences between sexes for VAS for pain (males = 4.55 ± 6.50; females = 1.22 ± 3.31; p = 0.228) and TSK-11 (males = 18.73 ± 3.17; females = 19.67 ± 4.61; p = 0.596). The results of this study demonstrated males had significantly higher ACL-RSI scores than females, suggesting males may have higher psychological readiness following clearance for RTS. This study did not demonstrate significant differences between sexes for kinesiophobia or pain level. Caution in interpretation of results is warranted due to the small sample size, highlighting the need for further research in this area.

An 8-week physiotherapist-led return to sport group program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves measures of physical and psychological function: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Low return to competitive sport, high reinjury rates and long-term functional impairment of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) present significant challenges for patients. A program that facilitates a safe return to sport (RTS) following ACLR could potentially improve outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case Series. METHODS: Sixty participants (median 20-years-old (13-36), 43 males, 18 females, median 7.5 months (4-25) post-ACLR) completed an eight-week exercise program. A battery of physical tests and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed pre and post-program. The number of participants passing RTS criteria was evaluated, and RTS rates were determined. The correlation between the ACL-RSI and measures of physical function was explored. RESULTS: Improvements in all isometric strength, hop tests, running T-test, and patient reported outcome measures were seen post-program. Five (8%) participants successfully passed all RTS criteria and eighty-five percent of participants returned to their previous level of sport. The ACL-RSI and the IKDC showed correlation across all time points (pre rs = 0.49; post rs = 0.40; change r = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated improvements in all RTS criteria tests upon completing the 8-week rehabilitation program; however, few participants (8%) passed all RTS criteria. Psychological readiness is more closely related to patient-reported function than functional tests.

The effect of factors from different time points on psychological readiness following ACL reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine factors correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity after ACLR. DESIGN: cross sectional study. SETTING: controlled laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 164 patients (82 M/82 F, 22.5 ± 8.9yr, 171.6 ± 11.0 cm, 77.4 ± 18.6 kg, 8.6 ± 3.4 months post-ACLR) participated in this study after a primary, isolated, and uncomplicated ACLR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ACL Return to Sport Index (ACL-RSI). RESULTS: ACL-RSI scores demonstrated a weak positive correlation with activity level at the time of injury and a fair positive correlation with activity level at the time of post-operative testing (p-values: 0.004, <0.001). ACL-RSI scores showed a statistically significant fair negative correlation with pain and a moderate negative correlation with kinesiophobia during rehabilitation (p-values: <0.001, <0.001). There was no statistical significance between ACL-RSI and the surgical variables (p-value range: 0.10-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes from testing during postoperative rehabilitation were most correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity after ACLR. Increased pain and kinesiophobia were associated with a decreased psychological readiness. Increased activity level prior to injury and activity level at the time of testing during rehabilitation were both correlated with increased psychological readiness. Psychological readiness to return to activity may need to be customized based on potentially modifiable patient-specific factors during the post-operative rehabilitation.

'It's just my knee': a qualitative study investigating the process of reframing and young athletes' perceived quality of life between anterior cruciate ligament injury and surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the factors influencing young athletes' perceptions of quality of life (QOL) following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, prior to reconstructive surgery. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis of data. SETTING: Tertiary sports medicine clinic with patients recruited from the practices of three specialist orthopaedic surgeons. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty athletes aged 14-25 provided consent to participate in the study and completed interviews prior to their ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants were eligible to participate if they were scheduled to undergo ACL reconstruction, were 25 years of age or younger, identified as athletes (participated in any level of organised sport), could communicate in English and agreed to be audio recorded. Participants were not eligible if they had experienced a multiligament injury or fracture. RESULTS: Young athletes shared common factors that made up their QOL; social connections and support, sport, health, and independence. However, participants' perceptions of their current QOL were quite variable (13-95/100 on a Visual Analogue Scale). Participants who were able to reframe their injury experience by shifting focus to the positive or unaffected aspects of their lives tended to have more favourable perceptions of their QOL than participants who shifted focus to the losses associated with injury. CONCLUSIONS: Young athletes who have experienced an ACL injury define their QOL based on social support, sport, health and independence. Individual processes of adaptation and cognitive reframing in response to an ACL injury may exert a greater influence on postinjury QOL than the physical ramifications of the injury itself. Understanding individual perceptions may help target potential interventions or supports to enhance athletes' adaptation to injury.

Preoperative Rehabilitation Enhances Mental and Physical Well-Being in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Individuals: A Mixed Methods Study.

CONTEXT: Rehabilitation after an anterior cruciate ligament injury is recommended to be started soon after the injury. When surgery is required, research supports the delivery of physiotherapy before anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (prehabilitation) to optimize recovery and positive outcomes. Individuals attending prehabilitation have never been questioned regarding their adherence to prehabilitation, perception of utility in meeting needs, upcoming events, or anticipated recovery goals. DESIGN: Mixed methods cross-sectional study: Methods: 25 individuals before anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (43% of eligible individuals from 12 clinics during the delivery period) were surveyed on their mindset and recovery expectancies. Semistructured interviews conducted in 9 of 25 participants assessed their lived experience of prehabilitation. RESULTS: Participants reported that preventing a reinjury (96% of responses) and feeling confident during daily activities about their knee (92%) were the higher rating expectations at this stage of their treatment course. Three themes were developed from the interviews and analyses. (1) Participants reported that prehabilitation was a period full of challenges with memories of the injury and uncertainties. (2) They viewed prehabilitation as a step to move forward by finding support and self-motivating. (3) They believed that prehabilitation would have positive impacts on the treatment outcomes. Participants were confident that prehabilitation would accelerate the recovery of muscle volume (88%) and strength (84%). CONCLUSION: Participants had positive experiences of prehabilitation, aligning with the findings on functional outcomes in the existing literature on prehabilitation.

Psychological Responses During Latter Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

CONTEXT: Despite positive physical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), many athletes do not return to sport afterward. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there were differences between athletes who returned to play and those who did not return to sport after ACLR in patterns of psychological responses to injury over the latter course of rehabilitation and return to sport. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Comprehensive orthopedic medical center referrals. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine recreational and competitive athletes (13 to 58 years, 21 males) with a first ACL tear were observed over the course of the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Return to sport. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of participants returned to play by 9 months post-ACLR. Those who returned showed a linear decrease in reinjury anxiety from 4 to 9 months post-ACLR, whereas those who did not return showed a linear decrease from 4 to 6 months post-ACLR and then a leveling off from 6 to 9 months. Those who returned showed linear and quadratic effects on perceived limitations of ability with a decrease from 4 to 9 months post-ACLR that accelerated over time, whereas nonreturners showed a linear decrease over time. No significant differences were found between returners and nonreturners in knee self-efficacy, perceived percent recovery, and psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that reinjury anxiety and perceived limitations of ability are psychological constructs on which returners and nonreturners differ and therefore may be points of intervention to increase the likelihood of return to sport.

The Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI) is a valid and reliable measure to assess psychological readiness before returning to sport following peroneal tendon pathology surgery.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to validate a scale that could help surgeons evaluate patients' psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) after peroneal tendon pathology surgery. METHODS: The Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI) scale, which had previously been validated in ankle ligament reconstruction patients, was adapted to evaluate the psychological preparedness for RTS in athletic patients who underwent peroneal tendinopathy surgery. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM) scores were employed as patient-related outcome measurement (PROM) instruments. RESULTS: This study included 57 patients. There was a strong correlation between ALR-RSI and both FAOS and FAAM (r = -0.68 and 0.74, respectively). ALR-RSI was considerably higher in patients who returned to sports than in those who did not. The mean score was 72.9 ± 19.0 in patients who returned to the same preinjury level, 48.5 ± 24.0 in those who returned to a lower level and 53.6 ± 31.1 in patients who changed their athletic activity (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, ALR-RSI showed at least a similar discrimination ability when compared to FAOS and FAAM. The test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95. The Cronbach's α statistic used to measure the internal consistency was high (0.95). A Youden index of 0.65 was observed for a cut-off score of 68 points. CONCLUSION: ALR-RSI is a valid instrument for assessing psychological readiness to RTS in an athletic population following peroneal tendon surgery. When compared to the most commonly used PROMs, it was strongly correlated and demonstrated at least similar discrimination capacity. This could assist surgeons in identifying athletes who will have poor postoperative results and advising them on their capability to RTS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Validation of the Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sports after Injury (ALR-RSI) Score as a Tool to Assess Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport in an Active Population After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Cross-sectional Study.

Ankle injuries account for 15% to 25% of all sports injuries resulting in significant pain and loss of function. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to validate a scale to help surgeons quantify the psychological readiness to Return To Sport (RTS) in patients undergoing ankle fracture surgery. ALR-RSI was used to assess the psychological readiness for RTS in athletic patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation between January 2020 and January 2021. Participants filled out ALR-RSI and 2 Patient-Related Outcome Measurement (PROM) tools: Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS). A total of 93 patients were included. There was a strong correlation between ALR-RSI and both OMAS and SEFAS, with Pearson coefficients of r = 0.58 and 0.53, respectively. ALR-RSI was significantly higher in the RTS group than in those who no longer practiced their main preinjury sport. Moreover, the discriminant validity of ALR-RSI (AUC = 0.81) was better than that of the SEFAS and OMAS (AUC = 0.64 and 0.65, respectively, p = .001). The intra-class correlation coefficient ρ of 0.94 showed excellent reproducibility. At an optimal cutoff value of 76.7, ALR-RSI had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 75% with a Youden index of 0.56. In conclusion, ALR-RSI was a valid and reproducible tool to evaluate the psychological readiness for RTS in an active population after an ankle fracture. This score could help surgeons identify athletes who may have unfavorable postoperative outcomes and provide support on the ability to RTS.

Short-term fear of movement improves less after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with concomitant meniscus repair.

BACKGROUND: Psychological response is important in return-to-sport decisions for athletes recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to compare psychological response after ACLR with a concomitant meniscus repair compared to isolated ACLR. METHODS: Thirty-five individuals completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return-to-Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale before ACLR and 2, 4, and 6 months after ACLR. Participants were dichotomized based on presence of concomitant meniscus repair (Yes/No). Separate group X time repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted for both scales. RESULTS: Participants were 65.7% female, 19.1 ± 4.7 years old with BMI of 24.9 ± 4.4 kg/m2. Sixteen individuals had an isolated ACLR with 19 individuals having an ACLR with concomitant meniscus repair. For the TSK, there was a group × time interaction effect(p = 0.028), with improvement in TSK scores for the isolated ACLR group (ACLR:2 months = 24.8 ± 3.7; 4 months = 22.0 ± 5.7; 6 months: 19.9 ± 5.9; Meniscus Repair:2 months = 25.5 ± 4.7; 4 months = 24.1 ± 5.0; 6 months: 23.8 ± 4.7). Six months after ACLR, TSK scores were worse in the meniscus repair group(p = 0.036). For the ACL-RSI, there was no interaction(p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Concomitant meniscus repair with ACLR results in less post-operative improvement in kinesiophobia through 6 months after ACLR compared to isolated ACLR.

Psychological Readiness, Injury-Related Fear, and Persistent Knee Symptoms After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Poor psychological responses after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been associated with a failure to return to sport and increased secondary injury risk. However, we do not know whether poor psychological responses after ACLR influence patient-reported knee function and knee symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between psychological factors (ie, psychological readiness and injury-related fear) and the presence of persistent knee symptoms in individuals 6 to 12 months after ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: In total, 101 participants, aged 13 to 25 years old, between 6 and 12 months after primary unilateral ACLR were enrolled in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Persistent knee symptoms were identified using an established criterion based on the subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Participants also completed the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) to assess psychological readiness and injury-related fear, respectively. Higher ACL-RSI scores indicate higher psychological readiness, and higher TSK-11 scores indicate higher injury-related fear. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants (29%) met the criteria for persistent knee symptoms. For every 1 SD lower in the ACL-RSI score, participants had 2.1 times greater odds of persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (95% CI = 1.3, 3.6). For every 1 SD higher in the TSK-11 score, participants had 1.9 times greater odds of persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (95% CI = 1.1, 3.3). Both the ACL-RSI and TSK-11 were considered good at classifying persistent knee symptoms, as the areas under the curve were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with a lower level of psychological readiness and more injury-related fear after ACLR had greater odds of persistent knee symptoms. Overall, these results highlight the potential clinical benefit of a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to managing health and wellness for individuals after ACLR.

Editorial Commentary: Supporting Patients Psychologically and Reducing Kinesiophobia May Improve Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.

Athletes face an uphill battle after an anterior cruciate ligament tear if they want to return to their sport. Almost one-third of patients never return to their preinjury level of sport involvement, and many athletes dread this outcome. Although this distress is an understandable reaction, it can be demotivating, and psychological engagement in the recovery process is crucial to achieving desired outcomes. In particular, psychological readiness to return to sport is associated with greater likelihood of returning to sport. However, other psychological factors, including kinesiophobia, can negatively impact readiness to return to sport preoperatively and postoperatively. Supporting patients psychologically and reducing kinesiophobia throughout the recovery process may be essential to improving outcomes after an anterior cruciate ligament tear.

Combining Neurocognitive and Functional Tests to Improve Return-to-Sport Decisions Following ACL Reconstruction.

SYNOPSIS: Neuroplasticity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury alters how the nervous system generates movement and maintains dynamic joint stability. The postinjury neuroplasticity can cause neural compensations that increase reliance on neurocognition. Return-to-sport testing quantifies physical function but fails to detect important neural compensations. To assess for neural compensations in a clinical setting, we recommend evaluating athletes' neurocognitive reliance by augmenting return-to-sport testing with combined neurocognitive and motor dual-task challenges. In this Viewpoint, we (1) share the latest evidence related to ACL injury neuroplasticity and (2) share simple principles and new assessments with preliminary data to improve return-to-sport decisions following ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-5. Epub: 16 May 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11489.

Drop Jump Performance Improves One Year Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sportsmen Irrespectively of Psychological Patient Reported Outcomes.

Our study aims to prospectively report the functional outcomes of 31 sportsmen following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, up to 12 months after surgery, with regards to subjective tests and drop jump performance, and to investigate the correlations between these variables, to be used for determining the return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, and the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale were evaluated preoperatively, at 6 months, and at 12 months after surgery. Drop vertical jump was recorded using an infrared optical acquisition system. Lysholm and ACL-RSI scores significantly improved at the 12-month follow-up compared to the baseline and 6-month evaluations (p < 0.001). Concerning Tegner activity level, no statistically significant differences were reported between pre- and post-operative status (p = 0.179). Drop jump limb symmetry index significantly improved at 12 months, with the mean value improving from 76.6% (SD: 32,4) pre-operatively to 90.2% (SD: 14.7; p < 0.001) at follow-up. Scarce positive correlation was reported between the ability to perform drop jumps and activity level in athletes one year after ACL reconstruction. In addition, subjective knee score and psychological readiness were not related to jumping performance.

Quadriceps strength and psychological readiness are associated with multiplanar knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Gait asymmetry, negative psychological factors and quadriceps strength deficits are common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Whether quadriceps strength and psychological factors have impacts on multiplanar knee kinematics remains unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the relationships of multiplanar knee kinematics during the gait cycle and psychological readiness to quadriceps strength after ACLR? METHOD: In total, 45 patients were enrolled in this study at 8.3 ± 1.5 months after ACLR. All patients underwent gait analysis and isokinetic testing. Interlimb differences in the range of motion (ROM) and maximum and initial contact (IC) angles in abduction-adduction, flexion-extension, and internal-external rotation were calculated. The limb symmetry index (LSI) for quadriceps strength was calculated. Psychological readiness was measured using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale. The paired t test analyzed the differences between contralateral and affected limbs in quadriceps and hamstrings strength. Pearson or Spearman correlation was used to assess relationships between the variables of interest. RESULTS: Significant differences between contralateral and affected limbs were observed in isokinetic knee quadriceps strength (P < 0.001) and hamstring strength (P = 0.009). The ACL-RSI score correlated negatively with interlimb differences in the knee flexion angle at IC (r = -0.35, P = 0.02) and ROM in the transverse plane (r = -0.41, P = 0.003). The LSI for quadriceps strength correlated negatively with the peak knee flexion angle (r = -0.37, P = 0.02) and positively with the ACL-RSI score (r = 0.3, P = 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Greater psychological readiness and quadriceps strength are associated with more symmetrical multiplanar knee kinematics. The improvement of these parameters may aid the recovery of knee kinematics after ACLR, and reduce the rate of reinjury and incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

Kinesiophobia Is Negatively Associated With Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport in Patients Awaiting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To identify the factors associated with anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scores in patients awaiting ACL reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional observational study conducted at a single clinical center. We recruited patients scheduled for primary ACLR, aged 16-45 years, and with modified Tegner activity scale scores ≥5 before ACL injury. The main outcome was psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS), as measured using the ACL-RSI scale. Participants' personal and injury-related information were obtained, and their psychological status (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia [TSK] and athletic identity measurement scale) and knee functions (effusion, range of motion, joint stability, and knee flexion angle during a single-leg squat) were examined. All variables were assessed the day before the surgery. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients (median [interquartile range]: age, 20.0 [9.0] years; body mass index, 22.8 [4.3] kg/m2; days from injury to surgery, 63.0 [65.0] days; 44% female) were enrolled. Univariate analysis indicated that only the TSK score was associated with the ACL-RSI scores (r = -0.305; P = .02). Multiple regression analysis of factors, including sex, preinjury Tegner activity scale score, and days from injury to surgery, further showed that only the TSK score was associated with the ACL-RSI scores (P = .002; 95% confidence interval -1.738 to -0.394). CONCLUSIONS: In patients awaiting ACLR, kinesiophobia was moderately negatively associated with psychological readiness to RTS, while other factors were not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cross-sectional observational study.

The relationship between drop vertical jump action-observation brain activity and kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cross-sectional fMRI study.

BACKGROUND: Injury and reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) result in central nervous system alteration to control the muscles around the knee joint. Most individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) experience kinesiophobia which can prevent them from returning to activity and is associated with negative outcomes after ACLR. However, it is unknown if kinesiophobia alters brain activity after ACL injury. OBJECTIVES: To compare brain activity between an ACLR group and matched uninjured controls during an action-observation drop vertical jump (AO-DVJ) paradigm and to explore the association between kinesiophobia and brain activity in the ACLR group. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled 26 individuals, 13 with ACLR (5 males and 8 females, 20.62 ± 1.93 years, 1.71 ± 0.1 m, 68.42 ± 14.75 kg) and 13 matched uninjured controls (5 males and 8 females, 22.92 ± 3.17 years, 1.74 ± 0.10 m, 70.48 ± 15.38 kg). Individuals were matched on sex and activity level. Participants completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) to evaluate the level of movement-related fear. To assay the brain activity associated with a functional movement, the current study employed an action-observation/motor imagery paradigm during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). RESULTS: The ACLR group had lower brain activity in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex relative to the uninjured control group. Brain activity of the left cerebellum Crus I and Crus II, the right cerebellum lobule IX, amygdala, middle temporal gyrus, and temporal pole were positively correlated with TSK-11 scores in the ACLR group. CONCLUSION: Brain activity for the AO-DVJ paradigm was different between the ACLR group and uninjured controls. Secondly, in participants with ACLR, there was a positive relationship between TSK-11 scores and activity in brain areas engaged in fear and cognitive processes during the AO-DVJ paradigm.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury Scale: Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version.

BACKGROUND: The Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) is used to measure athletes' psychological readiness in terms of their emotions, confidence in performance, and risk appraisal with respect to return to sport after ACL reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the ACL-RSI to the Persian version and evaluate the reliability and validity of this scale in patients with ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement study (psychometric analysis). METHODS: To assess test-retest reliability, 100 participants were asked to complete the Persian version of the ACL-RSI 2 times with a 7- to 10-day interval. In the first assessment, the patients also filled the Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Questionnaire, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, α), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients), measurement error (standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change), and construct validity (Pearson r) were determined. RESULTS: Our results showed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = .94) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients = .90 (.85-.93)]. Standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change were 4.64 and 12.85, respectively. No significant bias was observed between test and retest. In addition, based on the results of correlation analysis, all hypotheses of this study were confirmed. The Persian version of the ACL-RSI had a strong correlation with Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport (I-PPR) (P < .001, r = .76) and Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia (TKS) (P < .001, r = -.68). Furthermore, a moderate correlation was observed between the Persian version of the ACL-RSI and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (P < .001, r = .44) and between this version of the ACL-RSI and the subscales of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (P < .001, r = .30-.55). CONCLUSION: Given its acceptable reliability and validity, the Persian version of the ACL-RSI seems to be a suitable tool for evaluating psychological readiness to return to sport after ACL reconstruction.

Patients that maintain their pre-injury level of physical activity 3-5 years after ACL reconstruction are, 18 months after surgery, characterised by higher levels of readiness to return to sport.

PURPOSE: To characterise patients who had returned to their pre-injury physical activity (PA) or higher at 18 months and maintained that level of PA 3-5 years after the primary ACL reconstruction and to describe the level, frequency, and type of PA participation during the first 5 years after ACL reconstruction  METHOD: Data, from follow-ups at 18 months and 3-5 years after an ACL reconstruction, were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific register. Patients, 15-65 years of age, were included. The data comprised patient-reported outcomes and the results from two questions with respect to the level, frequency, and type of PA. Comparisons were made between patients who had and had not maintained their pre-injury level of PA at the follow-up 3-5 years after an ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 272 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was 3.8 years (min-max: 2.9-5.1) after the ACL reconstruction. Of patients who had returned to their pre-injury or a higher level of PA at the 18 month follow-up (n = 114), 68% (n = 78) maintained that level at the 3- to 5-year follow-up after ACL reconstruction. These patients reported a higher level of psychological readiness to return to sport (98 versus 79; p = 0.013). Moreover, these patients were 6.0 years older (p = 0.016) and were characterised by male sex (56% versus 44%; p = 0.028) and a lower level of pre-injury PA (p = 0.013). At the follow-up 3-5 years after the ACL reconstruction, more than 90% met the recommendations for PA. However, the prevalence of physical inactivity had increased and the involvement in organised PA had decreased compared with the 18-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Two out of three patients who have returned to their previous level of PA at 18 months can be expected to maintain that level, 3-5 years following ACL reconstruction. These patients were mainly characterised by a higher level of psychological readiness, especially in patients who participated in knee-strenuous sport and were younger than 20 years of age. The results of this study suggest that patients become more physically inactive over time, implicating the importance of clinicians helping patients find a suitable PA that may help patients maintain an active lifestyle.

Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Requires Evaluation of >2 Functional Tests, Psychological Readiness, Quadriceps/Hamstring Strength, and Time After Surgery of 8 Months.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the factors commonly used to determine readiness for return to sport (RTS) in the ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) patient population and assess which were most influential to successfully returning to sport and avoiding re-tear. METHODS: The PUBMED, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies related to RTS in ACL-R. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to identify studies with greater than 1-year outcomes detailing the rate of return and re-tear given a described RTS protocol. Data of interest were extracted, and studies were stratified based on level of evidence and selected study features. Meta-analysis or subjective synthesis of appropriate studies was used to assess more than 25 potentially significant variables effecting RTS and re-tear. RESULTS: After initial search of 1503 studies, 47 articles were selected for inclusion in the final data analysis, including a total of 1432 patients (31.4% female, 68.6% male). A meta-analysis of re-tear rate for included Level of Evidence 1 studies was calculated to be 2.8%. Subgroups including protocols containing a strict time until RTS, strength testing, and ≥2 dynamic tests demonstrated decreased RTS and re-tear heterogeneity from the larger group. Time to RTS, strength testing, dynamic functional testing, and knee stability were also found to be among the most prevalent reported criteria in RTS protocol studies. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a multifactorial clinical algorithm for successful evaluation of RTS. The "critical criteria" recommended by the authors to be part of the postoperative RTS criteria include time since surgery of 8 months, use of >2 functional tests, psychological readiness testing, and quadriceps/hamstring strength testing in addition to the modifying patient factors of age and female gender. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.