Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
2.
Injury ; 51(2): 322-328, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31812323

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment for proximal humerus fractures remains controversial. Studies of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) rarely account for reduction quality, while surgeon experience and sagittal plane reduction remain unstudied. In a retrospective case series analysis of AO/OTA C-type proximal humerus fractures treated with ORIF using a locking plate, we hypothesized that reduction quality would be associated with outcome, and reductions would improve with experience. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 41 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures treated with ORIF by a single orthopaedic traumatologist. Two blinded traumatologists assessed injury and post-operative radiographs for medial calcar disruption and five measures of deformity. Major complications and functional outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Outcome by ASES score was similar to previous reports (mean 73.6, std dev 22.5). Eleven of 35 patients (31.4%) with greater than six months follow-up experienced a complication. Post-reduction sagittal HSa<25° (RR = =9.44, p = =0.024) and medial calcar disruption (RR = =3.82, p = =0.009) were associated with complications. Post-reduction coronal and sagittal HSa improved with experience (p < 0.001 and p = =0.032, respectively) as did the likelihood of overall anatomic reduction (p = =0.006). ROC analysis found a threshold for superior reduction quality after 23 cases (AUC = =0.873, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sagittal reduction quality and medial calcar disruption were associated with complications. Additionally, reduction quality improved with experience. Future studies of proximal humerus ORIF should include multiplanar assessments of reduction while accounting for surgeon experience.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Placas Óseas , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reducción Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Cuidados Posoperatorios/normas , Radiografía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
BMJ Open ; 9(9): e031118, 2019 09 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31488493

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine if level 1 evidence from a landmark trial changed practice patterns for treatment of patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two level 1 trauma centres. PARTICIPANTS: Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. RESULTS: 686 patients met inclusion criteria. The pretrial cohort (n=108) was 68.5% male, with a mean age of 37.7 (±13.9) years. The post-trial cohort (n=578) was 76.1% male, with a mean age of 41.9 (±12.7) years. There was nearly a 10-fold increase in the patients treated with openreduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the post-trial cohort (34.1%) compared with the pretrial cohort (3.7%) (p<0.001). Patients in the post-trial cohort were more likely to undergo ORIF if they were <40 years (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.53 to 3.10), if their Injury Severity Score was >9 (OR=1.6; 95% CI 0.89 to 2.99) or if they were treated at a centre that participated in the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) trial (OR=5.2; 95% CI 3.31 to 8.21). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a significant shift towards more frequent ORIF for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures following the COTS trial. Quantifying changes in practice pattern following publication of level 1 evidence is important to further our understanding of the impact large randomisedclinical trails are having on clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Clavícula/lesiones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios Controlados Antes y Después , Diáfisis/lesiones , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reducción Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Adulto Joven
4.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 14(1): 155, 2019 May 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31126304

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to explore if the arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) technique is superior to the traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) technique in the treatment of tibial lateral plateau fractures. METHODS: Forty patients with tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker type I-III) treated with ARIF or ORIF from 2012 to 2017 were included in this retrospective study. All patients received pre-operative radiographs and CT scans. The patients were divided into two groups (ARIF or ORIF). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months and an average follow-up of 44.4 months. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the modified Rasmussen radiological score. RESULTS: Satisfactory clinical and radiological results were found in 39 out of 40 (97.5%) patients. KSS and modified Rasmussen radiological score were significantly better in ARIF group. The mean KSS was 92.37 (± 6.3) for the ARIF group and 86.29 (± 11.54) for the ORIF group (p < 0.05). The mean modified Rasmussen radiographic score was 8.42 (± 2.24) for the ARIF group and 7.33 (± 1.83) for the ORIF group (p = 0.104). Worst clinical and radiological results were related to concomitant intra-articular lesions (p < 0.05). Meniscal tears were found and treated in 17 out of 40 (42.5%) patients. The overall complication rate was 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Both ARIF and ORIF provided a satisfactory outcome for the treatment of Schatzker I-III tibial plateau fractures. However, ARIF led to better clinical results than ORIF. No statistically significant differences were found in perioperative complications, radiological results, and post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/métodos , Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Artroscopía/tendencias , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 136, 2019 Mar 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927910

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is known that there are large regional variations in treatment methods for the management of proximal humeral fractures. The objective of this study was to investigate the national surgical trends in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures in South Korea. METHODS: We analyzed the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database from 2008 to 2016. International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes and procedure codes were used to identify patients aged ≥65 years with proximal humeral fractures. RESULTS: A total of 69,120 proximal humeral fractures were identified from 2008 to 2016. The overall operative rate for proximal humeral fractures increased steadily from 24.6% in 2008 to 36.8% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The rate of cases treated with open reduction and internal fixation tended to increase each year, from 71.5% of the overall surgeries in 2008 to 85.6% in 2016; conversely, the rate of cases treated with closed reduction and internal fixation tended to decrease from 19.9% in 2008 to 4.5% in 2016. In terms of type of arthroplasty procedure, the rate of cases treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty tended to increase significantly each year, from 8.2% of the overall arthroplasty procedures in 2008 to 52.0% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of reverse shoulder arthroplasty was shown to increase especially in patients aged 80 years or older. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings indicated that surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures, particularly by open reduction and internal fixation, continues to increase; in terms of type of arthroplasty procedure, the rate of cases treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty tended to increase.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/tendencias , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , República de Corea , Fracturas del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía
6.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(4): 1245-1251, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30908439

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: the diversity of the causes of trauma produces different patterns of fractures depending on sociodemographics, lifestyle, industry, and outdoor activities. Mandibular fractures (MFs) are the commonest facial fractures. Reconstruction aims to restore the preinjury anatomy and function as much as possible. AIM OF THE STUDY: to evaluate the demographics, etiologies, patterns, treatment modalities and outcomes of management of MFs in southern Egypt. PATIENTS AND METHODS: records of 1371 patients with MFs were reviewed to study the incidence, causes, patterns, treatment modalities and outcomes of surgical management. RESULTS: the study included 1152 (84.03%) males and 219 (15.97%) females. The second and third decades were the most vulnerable groups. Isolated MFs appeared in 75.49% of patients while in the others either zygoma and/or maxilla were affected. The commonest causes were road traffic accidents (66.89%) and fall from height (15.1%). The body was the commonest involved region (30.98%), followed by parasymphyseal region (24.33%). In 66.16% of patients, the treatment was open reduction and internal fixation while in 22.17%, closed reduction and intermaxillary fixation were used. 20.24% of the cases had 1 or more postoperative complications, mainly temporomandibular joint dysfunction in 64 cases, malocclusion in 58 cases, and paresthesia in 42 cases. CONCLUSION: the MFs are common in the youth. The road traffic accidents are the most common etiology. This can be reduced by simple measures like compulsory seat belts and wearing the helmet. Open reduction and internal fixation is the commonest treatment modality.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Egipto/epidemiología , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Dispositivos de Protección de la Cabeza/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Maloclusión/epidemiología , Maloclusión/etiología , Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Maxilar/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cinturones de Seguridad/efectos adversos , Cigoma
7.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 14(1): 26, 2019 Jan 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674325

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This review compares the outcomes and complication rates of three surgical strategies used for the management of symptomatic os acromiale. The purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations. METHODS: A systematic review of nine prospective studies, seven retrospective studies, and three case studies published across ten countries between 1993 and 2018 was performed. Adult patients (i.e., ≥ 18 years of age) with a symptomatic os acromiale that failed nonoperative management were included in this review. Surgical techniques utilized within the included studies include excision, acromioplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The primary outcomes of interest included patient satisfaction. Range of motion and several standardized outcome measurement tools were also included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was highest in the excision and ORIF groups, with 92% and 82% of patients reporting good to excellent postoperative results, respectively, compared to 63% in the acromioplasty group. All three patient groups experienced improvements in postoperative outcomes (i.e., active range of motion and patient-reported outcome scores). The excision group experienced a complication rate of 1%, while the acromioplasty group experienced a complication rate of 11% and the ORIF group a rate of 67%. CONCLUSION: This study reports on the largest sample of patients who underwent surgical treatment for a symptomatic os acromiale. We have demonstrated that excision of the os with meticulous repair of the deltoid resulted in the best clinical outcomes with the least complications. In healthy adult patients with a large os fragment and a normal rotator cuff, surgical fixation may provide increased preservation of deltoid function while offering good to excellent patient satisfaction. However, patients must be informed that a second procedure may be required to remove symptomatic hardware.


Asunto(s)
Acromion/diagnóstico por imagen , Acromion/cirugía , Enfermedades del Desarrollo Óseo/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Desarrollo Óseo/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Acromion/anomalías , Artroscopía/efectos adversos , Artroscopía/tendencias , Humanos , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 14(1): 22, 2019 Jan 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665430

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Using a larger, more comprehensive sample, and inclusion of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary surgical approach for proximal humerus fracture, we report on geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture in 2011 and comment on whether treatment consensus is being reached. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients with an x-ray-confirmed diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture in 2011. Patients receiving reverse shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or open reduction internal fixation within 60 days of their diagnosis were classified as surgical management patients. Unadjusted observed surgery rates and area treatment ratios adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated at the hospital referral region level. RESULTS: Among patients with proximal humerus fracture (N = 77,053), 15.4% received surgery and 84.6% received conservative management. Unadjusted surgery rates varied from 1.7 to 33.3% across hospital referral regions. Among patients receiving surgery, 22.3% received hemiarthroplasty, 65.8% received open reduction internal fixation, and 11.8% received reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients that were female, were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a lower frailty index, were white, or were not dual-eligible for Medicaid during the month of their index fracture were more likely to receive surgery (p < .0001). Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture persisted after adjustment for patient demographic and clinical differences across local areas. Average surgery rates ranged from 9.9 to 21.2% across area treatment ratio quintiles. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent geographic variation in surgery rates for proximal humerus fracture across the USA suggests no treatment consensus has been reached.


Asunto(s)
Consenso , Medicare/tendencias , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/tendencias , Fracturas del Hombro/epidemiología , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/tendencias , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 13(1): 293, 2018 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30458814

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Occurrence of calcaneus fractures is on the up trend. Owing to its unique anatomical morphology and limited soft-tissue envelope, management of calcaneus fractures is a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon, and surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the serious postoperative complications. In order to decrease the incidence of wound breakdown and improve clinical outcomes, it is necessary to understand which factors were associated with SSI. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of SSI and quantify the incidence of SSI in calcaneus fractures following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a level 1 trauma center from January 2014 to June in 2017. Data of adult patients with calcaneus fractures treated by ORIF were extracted from the electronic medical records. A total of 681 patients were collected. We reviewed the patients' demographics, characteristics of fracture, treatment-related variables, and indexes of laboratory examination. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis models were performed respectively to determine independent predictors of SSI. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients developed SSI in this study. The overall incidence of SSI after ORIF of calcaneus fracture was 9.7%, with 2.9% for deep infection and 6.8% for superficial SSI. Independent predictors of SSI identified by multivariate analysis were open fracture (odds ratio = 9.48, 95% CI = 4.53-19.85, P = 0.00007), high-energy injury (odds ratio = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.16-3.70, P = 0.01437), ASA class 3 or higher (odds ratio = 3.50, 95% CI = 1.18-10.37, P = 0.02401), and intraoperative temperature < 36.0 °C (odds ratio = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.13-2.28, P = 0.04410). CONCLUSION: The SSI incidence was high (9.7%) for calcaneus fractures following ORIF. External fixation plays an important role in the treatment of severely displaced and depressed intra-articular or open calcaneus fractures. Increased ASA class and intraoperative hypothermia were associated with wound breakdown, and elaborative evaluation of fracture and soft-tissue damage was vitally necessary in this at-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Calcáneo/lesiones , Calcáneo/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven
10.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 27(3): 219-225, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30489247

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to examine alterations in national trends managing midshaft clavicle fractures (MCF) and intra-articular distal humerus fractures (DHF) surrounding recent level 1 publications. A retrospective review of the PearlDiver supercomputer for DHF and MCF was performed. Using age limits defined in the original level 1 studies, total use and annual use rates were examined. Nonoperative management and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were reviewed for MCF. ORIF and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) were reviewed for DHF. A query yielded 4929 MCF and 106,535 DHF patients. A significant increase in ORIF use for MCF following the publication of the level 1 study (p = .002) and a strong, positive correlation (p = .007) were evident. Annual TEA (p = .515) use for DHF was not observed. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(3):219-225, 2018).


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Codo/tendencias , Clavícula/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Clavícula/lesiones , Bases de Datos Factuales , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
11.
Injury ; 49 Suppl 1: S2-S7, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29929687

RESUMEN

Internal fixation of bone fractures by plate osteosynthesis has continuously evolved for more than 100 years. The aim of internal fracture fixation has always been to restore the functional capacity of the broken bone. The principal requirements of operative fracture management, those being anatomical fracture reduction, durable fixation, preservation of biology, promotion of fracture healing and early patient mobilization, have always been crucial but were accomplished to different extents depending on the focus of the specific fracture fixation principle employed. The first successful approach for internal fracture fixation was anatomic open reduction and interfragmentary compression. This secured the fracture fragments, maintained alignment and enabled direct healing of the fracture fragments. However, the highly invasive approach inflicted an immense amount of biologic stress to the area surrounding the fracture site. Modern preferably anatomically pre-contoured locking plates with relative stability of the bone-implant construct enable durable fixation while allowing a less invasive approach that preserves the biology at the fracture site. In contrast to conventional plating, locked plating provides a certain amount of flexibility, which is required to induce the formation of periosteal callus through interfragmentary motion. Most recently the concept of dynamic plating was introduced, which aims to induce more controlled interfragmentary motion and active stimulation of periosteal callus formation. This review article describes the historic development of plating from conventional plating to locked and dynamic plating.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Reducción Abierta , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Tornillos Óseos , Callo Óseo , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Reducción Abierta/tendencias
12.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 27(2): 134-141, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28240716

RESUMEN

The management of neglected fracture of the lateral condyle of the humerus is controversial. Careful neglect and conservative management with early ulnar nerve transposition and ostetomy, in-situ surgical fixation and accurate open reduction and internal fixation are all recommended as treatment options. However, an overgrowth of fractured condyle, highly distorted anatomy, contracted soft tissue and almost unrecognizable fracture ends make open reduction a challenging task. As the functional loss is not severe, in-situ fixation of the fragment provides a good alternative. There have been proponents of both surgeries with very limited data on comparison on both procedures. Here, we present our experience of 45 patients, 22 treated with anatomical reduction and 23 treated with in-situ fixation with no attempts of anatomical restoration, and attempted to evaluate the results of two surgeries with a follow-up of at least 2 years. Neglected fractures of the lateral condyle were surgically treated with two different techniques. In all, 22 patients were treated with open reduction and fixation whereas 23 patients were treated with in-situ fixation to render the elbow stable. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. These patients were studied in terms of functional scores and radiological union. Radiological union was better in the anatomical reduction group with one nonunion compared with five in the in-situ group. However, functional results and elbow range were better in the in-situ fixation group. The surgical time was 57 min in in-situ fixation compared with 73 min in the anatomical reduction group. Complication rates were found to be high in the open reduction group. In-situ fixation of neglected lateral condyle fractures is an effective technique for the treatment of these difficult fractures presenting late compared with anatomical fixation. Radiological union, although less successful compared with open anatomical reduction, leads to better functional outcome, with decreased surgical time and postoperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología
13.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 27(2): 128-133, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28704297

RESUMEN

The surgical approach for open reduction and internal fixation of lateral condyle fractures in children is controversial. Some authors recommend the lateral approach to the elbow over the posterior approach because of theoretical concern for injury to the vascular supply of the distal humerus and potential avascular necrosis (AVN). The purpose of this retrospective case series study is to report the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of displaced lateral condyle fractures of the humerus by the posterior approach. Fifteen consecutive cases were reviewed and the posterior approach resulted in minimal postoperative loss of motion, no angular deformity, cosmetic scars, and no AVN. We support that AVN occurs because of stripping of soft tissues from the lateral condyle fragment and not the approach used. Stripping of soft tissues is not required when using the posterior approach because of excellent visualization of the fracture reduction.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Orthopedics ; 40(4): e641-e647, 2017 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28418573

RESUMEN

Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are increasing in frequency as the population ages. The purpose of this study was to investigate surgical and cost trends in the Medicare population. The PearlDiver database was queried using diagnosis codes to identify Medicare recipients with proximal humerus fractures from 2005 to 2012. Surgical trends, demographics, and charge/reimbursement data were analyzed. There were 750,426 proximal humerus fractures in Medicare recipients during the 8-year period. Eighty-five percent of the fractures were treated nonoperatively; however, the percentage of operative vs nonoperative management increased significantly over time for all fractures, isolated fractures, and fracture dislocations. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was the most common surgical treatment and remained constant. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) increased by 406% and hemiarthroplasty (HEMI) decreased by 47%. Compared with younger patients, older patients were more likely to undergo HEMI or RTSA than to undergo ORIF for isolated fractures and fracture dislocations. Charges and reimbursements from Medicare increased over time. The charge to reimbursement gap increased from 87% in 2005 to 104% in 2012. Charges were higher for RTSA than for ORIF or HEMI. Nonoperative management was the treatment of choice for 85% of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly; however, there was a trend toward higher rates of surgery. The RTSA rate increased and the HEMI rate decreased, while ORIF remained constant. There was an increasing charge to reimbursement ratio for all procedure types. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e641-e647.].


Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/economía , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/tendencias , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Reducción Abierta/economía , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Honorarios y Precios/tendencias , Fractura-Luxación/economía , Fractura-Luxación/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemiartroplastia/economía , Hemiartroplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemiartroplastia/tendencias , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reducción Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas del Hombro/terapia , Estados Unidos
15.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 99(8): 681-687, 2017 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28419036

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Understanding national trends in the treatment of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures will provide important insight into variations in regional treatment and identify areas for improving value and quality in care delivery in the U.S. METHODS: U.S. national trends in the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures were evaluated through query of the Humana (2007 to 2014) and ING (2007 to 2011) administrative claims databases. Geographic variation and changes in surgical and transfer rates over time were further explored through the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database (2006 to 2011). Hospital characteristics impacting treatment decisions were identified. RESULTS: A total of 29,642 pediatric patients with supracondylar humeral fractures were identified in the administrative claims databases and a projected 63,348 encounters for supracondylar humeral fracture were identified in the NEDS database. The majority of the patients (76.1%; 22,563 of 29,642) were treated definitively with cast immobilization. Operative treatment was performed in 23.9% of the patients (7,079 of 29,642), with no change observed in the operative rate over time (p = 0.055). Of patients undergoing operative treatment, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) was performed in 87.3%, with a significant increase noted in the rate of CRPP over time (p = 0.0001); open reduction was performed in 12.7%, with a significant decrease noted in the rate of open reduction over time (p < 0.0001). Regional surgical rates generally showed significant variation from 2006 to 2010, followed by a convergence in the surgical rate among all geographic regions in 2011. These trends occurred simultaneous to a significant increase in transfer rates nationwide, from 5.6% in 2006 to 9.1% in 2011 (p = 0.0011). Transfer rates were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) for nontrauma, nonteaching, and nonmetropolitan centers while surgical rates were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) for trauma, teaching, and metropolitan centers when rates were analyzed by hospital designation. CONCLUSIONS: Operative treatment was performed in 24% of pediatric patients with supracondylar humeral fractures from 2007 to 2014. There was a convergence of surgical rates across geographic regions, suggesting that a "standard of care" in the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures is being established nationally. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cases of pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture are increasingly being transferred to and, when managed surgically, receiving care at metropolitan facilities designated as trauma centers or teaching hospitals, with a corresponding decrease observed in the rate of open reduction. The optimization of nationwide referral and treatment patterns may improve value in care delivery.


Asunto(s)
Moldes Quirúrgicos/tendencias , Fijación de Fractura/tendencias , Fracturas del Húmero/terapia , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Adolescente , Clavos Ortopédicos , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Nivel de Atención , Estados Unidos
16.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 26(5): 412-416, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27832017

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of open reduction and complications of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in treating unstable diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 102 paediatric patients with a mean age of 9 years (range: 7-14 years) who underwent ESIN of unstable closed forearm fractures at three different centres. Closed reduction of one or both bones was achieved in 68 (67%) patients and open reduction was required in 34 (33%) patients. The rate of open reduction in single-bone fractures (52.2%) was significantly higher than that in both-bone fractures (27.8%) (P=0.04, Fisher's exact test). All the fractures united within 3 months. There were six refractures following nail removal. Five patients had superficial wound infections. Seven patients developed neuropraxia of the sensory branch of the radial nerve. All resolved spontaneously within 3 months of the surgery. ESIN is an effective technique in treating unstable diaphyseal forearm fractures. The need for open reduction should be decided promptly following failed attempts of closed reduction. Single-bone fractures are more likely to require open reduction than both-bone fractures. The radius should be reduced and stabilized first. If open reduction is required, this should be performed through a volar approach rather than a dorsal one.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos/tendencias , Elasticidad , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Fracturas del Cúbito/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/instrumentación , Fracturas del Radio/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas del Cúbito/diagnóstico por imagen
17.
COPD ; 13(6): 779-789, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27379970

RESUMEN

This study aimed to describe trends in the incidence of hip fracture hospitalizations, use of surgical procedures, and hospital outcomes among elderly patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Spain (2004-2013). We selected all patients with a discharge primary diagnosis of hip fracture using the Spanish national hospital discharge database. Discharges were grouped by COPD status. From 2004 to 2013, 432,760 discharges with hip fracture were identified (6.9% suffered COPD). Incidence among COPD men increased by 2.63% per year from 2004 to 2013. There were no significant changes in tendency in the incidence among women with COPD during the study period. COPD women have almost three times higher incidence than COPD men. Incidences and hospital complications were higher among patients with COPD beside sex. The proportion of patients who underwent internal fixation increased for all groups of patients and the open reduction decreased. After multivariate analysis, in-hospital mortality (IHM) has improved over the study period for all patients. Suffering COPD was associated with higher IHM in men (odds ratio 1.45; 95% confidence interval 1.33-1.58) than women. In conclusion, hip fracture incidence is higher in subjects with than without COPD and is much higher among women than men. In COPD patients, incidence rates increased significantly in men from 2004 to 2013, but not in women. For all groups, the use of internal fixation has increased overtime and open reduction, IHM, and length of hospital stay have decreased from 2004 to 2013.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología
18.
Unfallchirurg ; 119(3): 225-36; quiz 236-8, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26939988

RESUMEN

The ideal treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is still controversially discussed. Because of the variable fracture patterns and the vulnerable soft tissue coverage an individual treatment concept is advisable. In order to minimize wound edge necrosis associated with extended lateral approaches, selected fractures may be treated percutaneously or in a less invasive manner while controlling joint reduction via a sinus tarsi approach. Fixation in these cases is achieved with screws, intramedullary locking nails or modified plates that are slid in subcutaneously. A thorough knowledge of the three dimensional calcaneal anatomy and open reduction maneuvers is a prerequisite for good results with less invasive techniques. Early functional follow-up treatment aims at early rehabilitation independent of the kind of fixation. Peripheral fractures of the talus and calcaneus frequently result from subluxation and dislocation at the subtalar and Chopart joints. They are still regularly overlooked and result in painful arthritis if left untreated. If an exact anatomical reduction of these intra-articular fractures is impossible, resection of small fragments is indicated.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Calcáneo/lesiones , Calcáneo/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Fracturas de Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Terapia Combinada/instrumentación , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/tendencias , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Reducción Abierta/instrumentación , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 25(5): e125-9, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26900143

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether a recent trend in evidence supporting operative treatment of clavicular fractures is matched with an increase in operative fixation and complication rates in the United States. METHODS: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was reviewed for cases with Current Procedural Terminology (American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, USA) code 23515 (clavicle open reduction internal fixation [ORIF]) from 1999 to 2010. The procedure rate for each year and the number of procedures for each candidate performing clavicle ORIF were calculated to determine if a change had occurred in the frequency of ORIF for clavicular fractures. Complication and outcome data were also reviewed. RESULTS: In 2010 vs, 1999, there were statistically significant increases in the mean number of clavicle ORIF performed among all candidates (0.89 vs. 0.13; P < .0001) and in the mean number of clavicle ORIF per candidate performing clavicle ORIF (2.47 vs. 1.20, P < .0473). The difference in the percentage of part II candidates performing clavicle ORIF from the start to the end of the study (11% vs. 36%) was significant (P < .0001). There was a significant increase in the clavicle ORIF percentage of total cases (0.11% vs. 0.74%, P < .0001). The most common complication was hardware failure (4%). CONCLUSION: The rate of ORIF of clavicular fractures has increased in candidates taking part II of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery, with a low complication rate. The increase in operative fixation during this interval may have been influenced by literature suggesting improved outcomes in patients treated with operative stabilization of their clavicular fracture.


Asunto(s)
Clavícula/lesiones , Clavícula/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Fijadores Internos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Falla de Prótesis , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Unfallchirurg ; 118(10): 851-7, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24408200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to summarize current treatment for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. METHOD: In all, 796 orthopedics and/or trauma departments in Germany were identified in the national hospital directory (www.dka.de). Using the respective hospital web sites, the email addresses of the responsible shoulder/sports surgeon or, if not available, the head of department (successful in 746 cases) were identified. Emails with a link to an online survey with 36 questions and two reminders were sent; 60 were undeliverable. Thus, 686 emails probably reached the addressee. A total of 203 colleagues (30%) participated in the survey. Findings were compared to results of the survey published by Bäthis et al. in 2001. RESULTS: More than 90% treat Rockwood I or II injuries conservatively and Rockwood IV to VI injuries surgically. However, 34% answered having never seen a Rockwood VI injury. Of those replying, 73% prefer surgical treatment for Rockwood III injuries. Favored surgical techniques were the hook plate in 44% and the arthoscopic TightRope® in 27%, while 11% prefer coracoclavicular cerclage, 6% AC joint transfixation, 3% minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR), 1% coracoclavicular screw fixation, and 8% a completely different procedure. Concerning acute Rockwood III injuries, orthopedics and/or trauma surgeons still prefer surgical treatment but less often than 10 years ago (84%). CONCLUSIONS: Favored techniques have completely changed since 2001 when the majority of physicians preferred AC joint transfixation or coracoclavicular cerclages, both techniques that are hardly used today. The hook plate appears to have become "standard therapy". The arthroscopic TightRope® is the second most common despite being the newest technique.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Reducción Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas del Hombro/diagnóstico , Fracturas del Hombro/terapia , Articulación Acromioclavicular , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/tendencias , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reducción Abierta/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Prevalencia , Fracturas del Hombro/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...