A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of a Laminin-5 fragment contained soothing cream in post-laser treatment care.

BACKGROUND: Photothermolysis effect, resulting from laser procedures, can cause redness/erythema, skin irritation and burning sensation, these symptoms may persist more than several days after the procedure and leading to discomfort for patients. Proper management is necessary for the better outcome, especially in early period after the laser procedure. Laminin-5 fragment contained soothing cream (CEBELIA Extreme Care®), is believed to have the calming/soothing effect on overheated/irritated skin after undergoing the laser treatment. It is assumed that cream can help alleviate the redness, erythema and burning sensation commonly experienced after laser treatments. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Laminin-5 fragment contained soothing cream (CEBELIA Extreme Care®) during the early post-laser care period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective split-face study involved 28 patients who underwent CO2 laser procedures and met inclusion criteria. The laser treatment was performed on both sides of the midface, and subsequently, the Laminin-5 fragment contained soothing cream (CEBELIA Extreme Care®) was applied to one side of the midface. The efficacy of the cream was evaluated through objective measures, including photographic evaluation by two independent evaluators and assessment using an automatic skin analysis device. Subjective evaluations were also conducted. RESULTS: The objective evaluation, based on the erythema score, revealed a statistical significant difference (p < 0.05) between the side treated with Laminin-5 fragment contained soothing cream (CEBELIA Extreme Care®) and the control side. The erythema score was 1.34 ± 2.469 after the laser treatment with subsequent application of the cream for 10 min and 0.7 ± 2.28 on the second day after the procedure. The subjective evaluation showed a statistically significant high of patient satisfaction. No complications were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The application of Laminin-5 fragment contained soothing cream (CEBELIA Extreme Care®) after the CO2 laser treatment was found to be effective, particularly when applied for 10 min after the laser treatment and on the second day after the procedure. Both objective and subjective evaluations yielded significantly different results. Patients reported a high satisfaction rate with the characteristics of the cream during the follow-up period.

Injeção de agregados plaquetários no rejuvenescimento facial: uma revisão sistemática / Injection of platelet aggregates in facial rejuvenation: a systematic review

Introdução: Essa revisão sistemática foi conduzida para avaliar se a associação da aplicação da injeção de agregados plaquetários quando comparada a outras terapias faciais favorece no rejuvenescimento facial em pacientes adultos. Métodos: A pesquisa buscou ensaios clínicos randomizados que compararam uso de técnicas de rejuvenescimento facial isoladas com as mesmas técnicas aliadas à injeção de agregados plaquetários. A busca foi realizada em bases de dados indexadas e literatura cinzenta. A ferramenta de risco de viés da "Cochrane Collaboration" foi aplicada para a avaliação da qualidade dos estudos. Resultados: Foram identificados 7137 artigos. Apenas quatro estudos permaneceram na síntese qualitativa, e os demais foram considerados com risco indefinido de viés nos domínios chaves. Conclusão: Existem poucos estudos na literatura que comparam o uso de agregados plaquetários em rejuvenescimento facial e os que estão disponíveis têm risco de viés "indefinido" ou "alto". Há necessidade de realizar mais estudos clínicos bem delineados que comparem o uso de injeção de agregados plaquetários associados ou não às técnicas de rejuvenescimento facial.

Introduction: This systematic review was conducted to assess whether the use of a platelet aggregate injection with or without associated facial rejuvenation techniques favors facial rejuvenation in adult patients. Methods: Randomized clinical trials that compared the use of techniques for facial rejuvenation alone with the same techniques coupled with the injection of platelet aggregates were searched. The search was performed in indexed databases and in the gray literature. The Cochrane Collaboration bias risk tool was applied to assess the quality of the studies. Results: In total, 7137 articles were identified. Only four studies remained in the qualitative synthesis, and the others were considered as having undefined bias risk in the key domains. Conclusion: There are few studies in the literature that compare the use of platelet aggregates in facial rejuvenation and those that are available have a risk of "undefined" or "high" bias. There is a need for more well-designed clinical studies comparing the use of platelet aggregate injection with or without associated facial rejuvenation techniques.