Gastroparesis Worsens Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Antral Ulcers by Bile Reflux via Activation of 5-HT3 and Dopamine D2 Receptors in Mice.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We examined the contributions of gastric emptying and duodenogastric bile reflux in the formation of gastric antral ulcers induced by NSAIDs in mice. METHODS: We used the murine re-fed indomethacin (IND) experimental ulcer model. Outcome measures included the appearance of gastric lesions 24 h after IND treatment and the assessment of gastric contents and the concentration of bile acids 1.5 h after re-feeding. The effects of atropine, dopamine, SR57227 (5-HT3 receptor agonist), apomorphine, ondansetron, haloperidol, and dietary taurocholate and cholestyramine were also examined. RESULTS: IND (10 mg/kg, s.c.) induced severe lesions only in the gastric antrum in the re-fed model. The antral lesion index and the amount of food intake during the 2-h refeeding period were positively correlated. Atropine and dopamine delayed gastric emptying, increased bile reflux, and worsened IND-induced antral lesions. SR57227 and apomorphine worsened antral lesions with increased bile reflux. These effects were prevented by the anti-emetic drugs ondansetron and haloperidol, respectively. The anti-emetic drugs markedly decreased the severity of antral lesions and the increase of bile reflux induced by atropine or dopamine without affecting delayed gastric emptying. Antral lesions induced by IND were increased by dietary taurocholate but decreased by the addition of the bile acid sequestrant cholestyramine. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that gastroparesis induced by atropine or dopamine worsens NSAID-induced gastric antral ulcers by increasing duodenogastric bile reflux via activation of 5-HT3 and dopamine D2 receptors.

Evaluation of Cholestyramine 15% Ointment in Relieving Pruritus and Burning After Ileostomy: A Rrandomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Purpose/Aims: Skin irritation is a common ileostomy problem that causes burning and pruritus among patients due to the leakage of intestinal discharge around the stoma. This clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of topical cholestyramine (15%) on the reduction of the levels of burning and pruritus after an ileostomy. Material and methods: The patients were randomly divided into two groups of treatment and control (n = 15). The intervention group was subjected to one fingertip of cholestyramine, whereas the other group received the placebo ointment (approximately 0.5 g) on the skin immediately after the surgery and twice a day for 2 months. The primary outcome measure was the severity of burning and pruritus measured by a visual analog scale at different times after an ileostomy. Results: Out of 34 patients, four cases were excluded due to the inappropriate completion of the questionnaire (n = 2) and unwillingness to attend the follow-up visits (n = 2). Therefore, 30 patients were included in the study. The levels of burning among patients in the cholestyramine were lower in weeks 3, 4, and 8 compared to the placebo group. Moreover, lower levels of pruritus were observed among patients in the treatment group in weeks 4 and 8 after an ileostomy. No side effects were reported among the patients. Conclusions: Topical cholestyramine was found to be effective in the management of burning and pruritus resulting from an ileostomy among the population under study.

Bile acids regulate cysteine catabolism and glutathione regeneration to modulate hepatic sensitivity to oxidative injury.

Bile acids are signaling molecules that critically control hepatocellular function. Disrupted bile acid homeostasis may be implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic liver diseases. Glutathione is an important antioxidant that protects the liver against oxidative injury. Various forms of liver disease share the common characteristics of reduced cellular glutathione and elevated oxidative stress. This study reports a potentially novel physiological function of bile acids in regulating hepatic sulfur amino acid and glutathione metabolism. We found that bile acids strongly inhibited the cysteine dioxygenase type-1-mediated (CDO1-mediated) cysteine catabolic pathway via a farnesoid X receptor-dependent mechanism. Attenuating this bile acid repressive effect depleted the free cysteine pool and reduced the glutathione concentration in mouse liver. Upon acetaminophen challenge, cholestyramine-fed mice showed impaired hepatic glutathione regeneration capacity and markedly worsened liver injury, which was fully prevented by N-acetylcysteine administration. These effects were recapitulated in CDO1-overexpressing hepatocytes. Findings from this study support the importance of maintaining bile acid homeostasis under physiological and pathophysiological conditions, as altered hepatic bile acid signaling may negatively impact the antioxidant defense mechanism and sensitivity to oxidative injury. Furthermore, this finding provides a possible explanation for the reported mild hepatotoxicity associated with the clinical use of bile acid sequestrants in human patients.

Tolerability and efficacy of colestipol hydrochloride for accelerated elimination of teriflunomide.

BACKGROUND: Teriflunomide is an oral disease modifying therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Teriflunomide' s pharmacokinetics (PK) contribute to its slow elimination, on average taking 6-8 months, though it can take up to 2 years in some instances. This slow elimination can become problematic in certain clinical situations - such as during pregnancy, when teriflunomide has potential teratogenic effects. In such scenarios, an accelerated elimination procedure (AEP) is recommended. Currently, AEPs with oral cholestyramine or activated charcoal are available but are restricted by adverse effects, limited administration routes, and dosing frequencies. METHODS: A single-center, PK interaction study was performed in a total of 14 healthy volunteers, to investigate colestipol hydrochloride (HCl) as an alternative to cholestyramine for the elimination of teriflunomide. Participants received teriflunomide for 14 days, followed by an AEP with colestipol HCl for 15 days. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The administration of colestipol HCl for 15 days was sufficient to reduce plasma teriflunomide concentrations by greater than 96%. Although colestipol HCl did not completely eliminate teriflunomide with the same effectiveness as cholestyramine, it may offer an alternative method for accelerated elimination of teriflunomide with potentially improved tolerability and more favorable dosing and administration options.

Cholestyramine treatment of healthy humans rapidly induces transient hypertriglyceridemia when treatment is initiated.

Bile acid (BA) production in mice is regulated by hepatic farnesoid X receptors and by intestinal fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-15 (in humans, FGF-19), a suppressor of BA synthesis that also reduces serum triglycerides and glucose. Cholestyramine treatment reduces FGF-19 and induces BA synthesis, whereas plasma triglycerides may increase from unclear reasons. We explored whether FGF-19 may suppress BA synthesis and plasma triglycerides in humans by modulation of FGF-19 levels through long-term cholestyramine treatment at increasing doses. In a second acute experiment, metabolic responses from 1 day of cholestyramine treatment were monitored. Long-term treatment reduced serum FGF-19 by >90%; BA synthesis increased up to 17-fold, whereas serum BAs, triglycerides, glucose, and insulin were stable. After long-term treatment, serum BAs and FGF-19 displayed rebound increases above baseline levels, and BA and cholesterol syntheses normalized after 1 wk without rebound reductions. Acute cholestyramine treatment decreased FGF-19 by 95% overnight and serum BAs by 60%, while BA synthesis increased fourfold and triglycerides doubled. The results support that FGF-19 represses BA synthesis but not serum triglycerides. However, after cessation of both long-term and 1-day cholestyramine treatment, circulating FGF-19 levels were normalized within 2 days, whereas BA synthesis remained significantly induced in both situations, indicating that also other mechanisms than the FGF-19 pathway are responsible for stimulation of BA synthesis elicited by cholestyramine. Several of the responses during cholestyramine treatment persisted at least 6 days after treatment, highlighting the importance of removing such treatment well before evaluating dynamics of the enterohepatic circulation in humans.

[Drugs and diarrhea]. / Arzneistoffe und Diarrhoe.

Drug induced diarrhea is a frequent adverse event. The pathophysiological mechanisms include intraluminal accumulation of osmotically active substances, increased secretion or impaired resorption of gastrointestinal fluids, stimulation of gastrointestinal motility, or inflammation of gastrointestinal mucosa. For many drugs, however, the causative mechanism is unknown. A careful drug history, including non-prescription drugs and additives that frequently cause diarrhea, is essential for the identification of potential causative substances. The clinical course of drug-induced diarrhea in many cases is mild and self-limited. In severe cases fluid-and electrolyte substitution, symptomatic and in certain cases specific therapy can be necessary. Symptomatic treatment primarily includes opioids and intraluminal adsorbents. In special cases octreotide or scopolamine can be used.

Pseudomembranous collagenous colitis with superimposed drug damage.

Pseudomembranous collagenous colitis is a rare pathological condition, not related to infectious agents, and characterized by thickening of the subepithelial collagen and formation of pseudomembranes. We report one such case, which responded to budesonide treatment after failures of previous approaches given, being unaware of the correct diagnosis.

[Antidiarrheal drugs for chronic diarrhea]. / Antidiarrhoika bei chronischer Diarrhoe.

Chronic diarrhea can be caused by multiple disease entities. Basic diagnostic tests are required in order to administer specific therapies whenever possible. If no specific treatment can be used, a symptomatic management should be initiated in order to prevent massive electrolyte- and water losses. Substances that can be used are loperamide, cholestyramine, bulking agents, probiotics, anticholinergic agents and in severe cases opioids. If used properly these agents can be prescribed longterm with an acceptable side effect profile.

The Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability scale validation study.

AIMS: The primary objective of this study was to validate a novel Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale intended to assess the acceptability and/or tolerability of bile acid sequestrant (BAS) beverage preparations. A secondary objective was to assess the utility of weightings based on subjective clinical importance for the BASA scale individual components and its composite score. METHODS: This was a randomised, single-blind, single site, controlled study of oral administration of 4 g of orange-flavoured generic cholestyramine powder, 12 g of orange-flavoured generic cholestyramine powder and an orange-flavoured sweetened control drink powder, each mixed with water. RESULTS: The study sample included 42 subjects; 26 men and 16 women. Participants were non-Hispanic white (76.2%) or black/African American (23.8%), with a mean age of 51.4 years and body mass index of 30.1 kg/m(2). The components of the BASA scale were taste, texture, appearance and mixability; the possible total BASA scores ranged being 4-20; the higher the BASA scale score, the better the acceptability/tolerability. Composite BASA scale scores were significantly lower for the 4 g (mean BASA score = 10.3) and 12 g (mean BASA score = 9.4) cholestyramine compared with the control drink powder (mean BASA score = 16.7) (p < 0.001). BASA scale scores did not significantly differ between the 4 and 12 g of cholestyramine. (p = 0.215). Weighting of the components did not materially alter the results. Findings for the individual components of the BASA scale were similar to the composite values. CONCLUSION: The BASA scale effectively distinguished between an orange-flavoured BAS powder and a commercial orange-flavour control powder.

Treatment of acute, non-traumatic pain using a combination of diclofenac-cholestyramine, uridine triphosphate, cytidine monophosphate, and hydroxycobalamin.

This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical study in parallel groups evaluated the safety and efficacy of an oral combination diclofenac-cholestyramine, nucleotides (uridine and cytidine) and vitamin B12 versus the oral combination of nucleotides and vitamin B12 in the treatment of acute, non-traumatic pain. Subjects received twice-daily, 10-day oral administration of diclofenac-cholestyramine + uridine + cytidine + vitamin B12 (Group DN, n=40) or uridine + cytidine + vitamin B12 (Group NB, n=41). The primary study endpoint was the number of subjects with VAS reduction of >30mm after 10 days of treatment. Secondary endpoints included the number of patients with improvement >5 points in the Patient Functionality Questionnaire after 10 days of treatment, and the number of subjects presenting adverse events. Treatment with the combination of diclofenac-cholestyramine, nucleotides and Vitamin B12 resulted in a higher number of subjects with VAS score reductions >30mm after 10 days of treatment (87.5% subjects) than in the control group administered nucleotides and Vitamin B12 (51.23% of subjects), (p>0.0006). A significantly higher number of subjects in the DN group (80%) had a score reduction of >5 points in the Patient Functionality Questionnaire at after 10 days of treatment compared to Group NB (29.3%), (p<0.001). The number of subjects presenting AEs did not vary significantly between treatment groups (p=0.587). The combination of diclofenac-cholestyramine with uridine, cytidine and vitamin B12 was well-tolerated over a 10-day treatment period. The combination reduced pain and improved functionality among subjects presenting acute, non-traumatic pain in the lower back, hips, and neck.

Clinical utility of anion gap in deciphering acid-base disorders.

The anion gap (AG) measurement is a very useful tool in the evaluation of patients with acid-base disorders. Once metabolic acidosis is identified, AG will provide the important first step in the differential diagnosis of disorders that either increase the AG and those that leave the AG unchanged. Delta gap is the comparison between change (delta) in the AG and the change (delta) in bicarbonate (HCO(3)(-)). Delta ratio, defined as delta AG:delta HCO(3)(-) is usually 1:1 in patients with an uncomplicated high AG acidosis. A value below 1:1 suggests a combined high and normal AG acidosis. A value above 2:1 suggests a combined metabolic alkalosis and a high AG acidosis. Urine AG (unmeasured anions-unmeasured cations) is an indirect estimate of the urine NH(4)(+) excretion. It is typically negative in patients with normal AG metabolic acidosis secondary to diarrhoea. Utilisation of AG calculations helps clinicians in identifying and treating acid-base disorders.

Hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis.

Cholestyramine carries a risk of hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis. Being cognisant of this drug-induced adverse event may reduce diagnostic delays. Emergency physicians should be alert about this condition, in particular among patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease, or who are taking spironolactone.

[Medicamentous bezoar following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the combined use of cholestyramine and antisecretory medications as a risk factor in pancreatic surgery]. / Pharmaco-bézoar après duodénopancréatectomie céphalique, association Choléstyramine + antisécrétoires: situation à risque en chirurgie pancréatique?

The authors describe a case of pharmaco-bezoar consisting of ingested cholestyramine which occurred post pancreaticoduodenectomy. Intestinal obstruction by a cholestyramine bezoar is a rare occurrence but is worthy of note in the post-pancreatectomy setting where there is often concomitant use of cholestyramine, proton pump inhibitors, and octreotide.

Cholestyramine--a useful adjunct for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

AIM/BACKGROUND: Cholestyramine may improve fecal incontinence, but its use has not been assessed. We report our experience with the use of cholestyramine in the treatment of fecal incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients (19 female, mean age 65 years) with fecal incontinence (>/=1 episode/week) received cholestyramine along with biofeedback therapy (group A). Stool frequency, stool consistency (Bristol scale), number of incontinent episodes, satisfaction with bowel function (VAS), and anorectal physiology were assessed at 3 months and at 1 year after treatment. Data were compared with a matched group of 21 incontinent subjects (19 female, mean age 64 years) who received biofeedback alone (group B). RESULTS: At 3 months and at 1 year, group A patients showed decreased stool frequency (p < 0.01), stool consistency (p = 0.001), and number of incontinent episodes (p < 0.04). In contrast, stool frequency (p = 0.8) and stool consistency (0.23) were not different from baseline in group B subjects. In both groups, there was improvement in the satisfaction with bowel function (p < 0.05), anal sphincter pressures (p < 0.05) and ability to retain saline infusion (p < 0.05). Mean dose of cholestyramine used was 3.6 g; 13 subjects (62%) required dose titration, and 7 (33%) subjects reported minor side effects. CONCLUSION: Cholestyramine is safe and useful adjunct for the treatment of diarrhea and fecal incontinence. Most patients require small doses, and dose titration is important. The improvement in stool characteristics favors a drug effect, over and above the benefits of biofeedback therapy.