Factor V Leiden-independent activated protein C resistance: Communication from the plasma coagulation inhibitors subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardisation Committee.

Activated protein C resistance (APC-R) due to the single-nucleotide polymorphism factor V Leiden (FVL) is the most common cause of hereditary thrombophilia. It is found predominantly in Caucasians and is uncommon or absent in other populations. Although FVL is responsible for >90% of cases of hereditary APC-R, a number of other F5 variants that also confer various degrees of APC-R and thrombotic risk have been described. Acquired APC-R due to increased levels of coagulation factors, reduced levels of inhibitors, or the presence of autoantibodies occurs in a variety of conditions and is an independent risk factor for thrombosis. It is common for thrombophilia screening protocols to restrict assessment for APC-R to demonstrating the presence or absence of FVL. The aim of this Scientific and Standardisation Committee communication is to detail the causes of FVL-independent APC-R to widen the diagnostic net, particularly in situations in which in vitro APC-R is encountered in the absence of FVL. Predilution clotting assays are not FVL specific and are used to detect clinically significant F5 variants conferring APC-R, whereas different forms of acquired APC-R are preferentially detected using the classical activated partial thromboplastin time-based APC-R assay without predilution and/or endogenous thrombin potential APC-R assays. Resource-specific recommendations are given to guide the detection of FVL-independent APC-R.

Laboratory Testing for the Evaluation of Phenotypic Activated Protein C Resistance.

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) is considered a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most common genetic disorder conferring APCR is a factor (F) V Leiden mutation, but many other factors are also implicated, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong-Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy and postpartum, depending on how APCR is defined. Considering the large population affected, the detection of this phenotype is crucial. Two types of tests are currently available: clotting time-based assays (with several versions) and thrombin generation-based assays with the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based assay. The purpose of this review is therefore to discuss the performances of these tests and the cases in which it would be appropriate to use one over the other. Initially, as APCR was thought to be solely related to the FV Leiden mutation, the objective was to obtain a 100% specific assay. Clotting-time based assays were thus specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Later on, an APCR condition without a FV Leiden mutation was identified and highlighted as an independent risk factor of VTE. Therefore, the development of a less specific assay was needed and a global coagulation test was proposed, known as the ETP-based APCR assay. In light of the above, these tests should not be used for the same purpose. Clotting time-based assays should only be recommended as a screening test for the detection of FV mutations prior to confirmation by genetic testing. On the other hand, the ETP-based APC resistance assay, in addition to being able to detect any type of APCR, could be proposed as a global screening test as it assesses the entire coagulation process.

Activated protein C resistance impact on Syrian candidates for in vitro fertilisation and the benefit of anticoagulation therapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Activated protein C resistance (APCR) is a common thrombophilia, caused mainly by a mutation. The impact of APCR on the efficacy of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) are still unclear, and no solid recommendations for its management were published. To investigate the effect of APCR on IVF outcomes and assess the efficacy of our management protocol, we retrospectively scanned the medical records of women who were tested with APCR assay in 2019 at our fertility centre. The 66 women (12%) positive for APCR had lower odds of reaching clinical pregnancies after IVF 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07-0.47] and fewer live births. The administration of low-molecular-weight heparin and aspirin associated with more implantation in treated compared to untreated APCR-positive women with an odds ratio of 43.2 [7.51-248.6]. In conclusion, APCR negatively affects the number of clinical pregnancies after IVF, but anticoagulation therapy can mitigate this effect and significantly increase clinical pregnancies.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The evidence about the impact of APCR on IVF outcomes is still inconclusive. According to the Canadian guideline, routine screening for thrombophilia in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss is not recommended. No clear recommendations regarding the management of APCR in the planning for IVF are yet available.What do the results of this study add? APCR significantly increases implantation failure among infertile women who conduct IVF. Management of APCR using LMWH and aspirin was effective in mitigating this effect and increasing successful implantation.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our findings can support the recommendation to include APCR assay in the routine tests for infertile women conducting IVF, and suggest the combination between LMWH and aspirin as an effective therapy to increase successful implantation in APCR positive candidates. However, more controlled clinical trials are still needed to confirm our results.

Venous thrombosis with oral postmenopausal hormone therapy: Roles of activated protein C resistance and tissue factor pathway inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Oral postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) increases the risk of venous thrombosis (VT). We postulated that activated protein C (APC) resistance induced by HT is one of the mechanisms causing VT, and also assessed the role of one of the main determinants of APC resistance (i.e., tissue factor pathway inhibitor [TFPI]). METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study embedded within two Women's Health Initiative hormone trials. Women were randomized to hormone therapy or placebo. Biomarkers were measured at baseline and after 1 year in 217 cases and 817 controls. RESULTS: Increased APC resistance and decreased TFPI at baseline were associated with VT (odds ratio 1.20-2.06). However, women with such prothrombotic profile at baseline did not have further increased risk of VT when randomized to HT compared with placebo. Although there was no change in APC resistance or TFPI in placebo group after 1 year, HT group showed prothrombotic changes in the biomarkers (i.e., an increase in APC resistance) (mean [standard deviation] 0.39 [0.54]) and decrease in TFPI (-0.21 [0.50]: free TFPI, -0.24 [0.22]: TFPI activity -0.22 [0.20]: total TFPI). However, HT induced prothrombotic change in biomarkers did not increase risk of VT. CONCLUSION: Women with prothrombotic levels of APC resistance and TFPI at baseline were not at increased risk of VT when randomized to HT compared with placebo. This suggests that testing for these biomarkers before starting HT is not required. HT led to prothrombotic change in these biomarkers after one year, but this did not relate to increased risk of VT.

Assessment of acquired activated protein C resistance with the FibWave and comparison with the ETP-based APC resistance.

INTRODUCTION: Activated protein C (APC) resistance is a major risk factor of venous thrombosis which may be acquired by hormonal therapy or other causes. The FibWave, a sensitive global clot-based assay design to analyze the coagulation kinetics in plasma, may be a good candidate to assess this prothrombotic state. This study aims to assess the suitability of the FibWave to differentiate the coagulation kinetics of women on oral contraceptives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four healthy volunteers were divided into 5 groups: men [n = 13], women not using hormonal contraception [n = 12], women using second [n = 12] or third generation [n = 12] combined oral contraceptives, and women using progestin only contraceptive [n = 5]. Patients with coagulation abnormalities were also assessed [n = 8]. The APC resistance was assessed on the FibWave using exogenous APC or Protac, and on the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram using the ETP-based APC resistance assay. RESULTS: Either in presence or in absence of APC or Protac, the FibWave was able to detect a hypercoagulable state in plasma samples. All combined oral contraceptives showed a lower FW-Max1 , FW-Max2, and FW-Min2 percentage of inhibition and a lower FW-Ttpeak ratio than the other groups. The sensitivity of the FibWave was similar to the one of the ETP-based APC resistance assay. CONCLUSION: The FibWave is able to differentiate APC resistance levels observed in women on combined oral contraceptive. The FW-Max1 , FW-Max2, and to a lesser degree FW-Min2 were identified as the most sensitive parameters with a similar performance to the ETP-based APC resistance assay.

Anti-Domain I ß2-Glycoprotein I Antibodies and Activated Protein C Resistance Predict Thrombosis in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: TAC(I)T Study.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies binding to domain I of ß2-glycoprotein I (aDI) and activated protein C (APC) resistance are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in cross-sectional studies. The objective of this study was to assess their predictive value for future thromboembolic events in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) or antiphospholipid syndrome. METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study included consecutive patients with aPL or systemic lupus erythematosus. We followed 137 patients (43.5 ± 15.4 year old; 107 women) for a mean duration of 43.1 ± 20.7 months. RESULTS: We detected aDI IgG antibodies by ELISA in 21 patients. An APC sensitivity ratio (APCsr) was determined using a thrombin generation-based test. The APCsr was higher in patients with anti-domain I antibodies demonstrating APC resistance (0.75 ± 0.13 vs 0.48 ± 0.20, P < 0.0001). In univariate analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) for thrombosis over time was higher in patients with aDI IgG (3.31 [95% CI, 1.15-9.52]; P = 0.03) and patients with higher APC resistance (APCsr >95th percentile; HR, 6.07 [95% CI, 1.69-21.87]; P = 0.006). A sensitivity analysis showed an increased risk of higher aDI IgG levels up to HR 5.61 (95% CI, 1.93-16.31; P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, aDI IgG (HR, 3.90 [95% CI, 1.33-11.46]; P = 0.01) and APC resistance (HR, 4.98 [95% CI, 1.36-18.28]; P = 0.02) remained significant predictors of thrombosis over time. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that novel tests for antibodies recognizing domain I of ß2-glycoprotein I and functional tests identifying APC resistance are significant predictors of thrombosis over time and may be useful for risk stratification.

Comparative analysis of "APTT vs RVVT" based activated protein C resistance assay in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation.

BACKGROUND: Thrombophilia is a hypercoagulable state characterized by increased venous thrombosis. The most common cause of heritable thrombophilia is Factor V Leiden (FVR506Q) homozygous state, with a relative risk of 10-80 times as compared to normal individuals and Lupus anticoagulant is the most common cause of acquired thrombophilia. The main objective of this study is to compare the sensitivity of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) vs dilute Russell viper venom test (DRVVT) based APCR assays with predilution in Factor V-deficient plasma for diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The coagulometer used for APCR test was Sysmex CS-5100. APTT reagent used is Pathrombin SL supplied by Siemens. All data were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired students t-test and a P value <0.05 was considered as statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 300 cases of APCR (200 cases of Factor V Leiden mutation was confirmed by PCR and 100 acquired) were studied. The sensitivity of screening APTT-based APCR for detection of Factor V Leiden mutation is 67% and for the noncarrier state, it is 62%. The sensitivity of modified APTT and DRVVT with predilution in FV-deficient plasma for detection of Factor V Leiden mutation is 82% and 84%, respectively and for acquired causes, it is 48% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Screening APTT test has increased in activated protein C resistance (APCR) due to Factor V Leiden mutation as well as acquired causes such as patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants, warfarin, lupus anticoagulants, and oral contraceptive pills which are independent risk factors of venous thrombosis. Modified DRVVT with predilution in FV-deficient plasma is more sensitive than screening and modified APTT-based APCR test in the diagnosis of Factor V Leiden mutation and the former test can distinguish homozygous and heterozygous states from normal individuals.

Laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: rivaroxaban induced interference and a comparative evaluation of andexanet alfa and DOAC Stop to neutralise interference.

Background Investigation of hemostasis is problematic when patients are on anticoagulant therapy. Rivaroxaban especially causes substantial interference, extending many clot-based tests, thereby leading to false positive or negative events. In particular, rivaroxaban affects some assays for activated protein C resistance (APCR). Methods We assessed, in an international setting, cross laboratory (n = 31) testing using four samples to evaluate rivaroxaban induced interference in APCR testing, and whether this interference could be neutralised. The samples comprised: (A) pool of normal plasma (APCR-negative control); (B) this normal pool spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (potential 'false' positive APCR event sample); (C) the rivaroxaban sample subsequently treated with a commercial direct oral anticoagulant 'DOAC-neutraliser' (DOAC Stop), or (D) treated with andexanet alfa (200 µg/mL). Testing was performed blind to sample type. Results The rivaroxaban-spiked sample generated false positive APCR results for some, but unexpectedly not most APCR-tests. The sample treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in the rivaroxaban-affected APCR assays, and did not otherwise adversely affect the rivaroxaban 'unaffected' APCR assays. The andexanet alfa-treated sample did not evidence correction of the false positive APCR, and instead unexpectedly exacerbated false positive APCR status with many tests. Conclusions DOAC Stop was able to neutralise any APCR interference induced by rivaroxaban. In contrast, andexanet alfa did not negate such interference, and instead unexpectedly created more false-positive APCR events.

Inherited Thrombophilia in a Lebanese Family of Four Generations: A Case Report of Recurrent Miscarriage.

INTRODUCTION: Factor V Leiden (G1691A), prothrombin (G20210A) and MTHFR (C677T) gene mutations were investigated in many studies for their association with Deep Venous Thrombosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A North Lebanese family has been examined, from an index case, a 40-year-old woman, who had a history of venous thrombosis with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. The index case was found to be heterozygous for factor V Leiden G1691A, prothrombin G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene variants. Her family members were heterozygous for at least two of the three-point mutations, and multiple risk factors associated with thrombophilia were identified. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the need for clarifying the utility and futility of thrombophilia testing in the era of molecular diagnostics.

Apixaban Does Not Interfere With Protein S or Activated Protein C Resistance (Factor V Leiden) Testing Using aPTT-Based Methods.

CONTEXT.­: Apixaban causes a false increase in activated protein C resistance (APCR) ratios and possibly protein S activity. OBJECTIVE.­: To investigate whether this increase can mask a diagnosis of factor V Leiden (FVL) or protein S deficiency in an actual population of patients undergoing apixaban treatment and hypercoagulation testing. DESIGN.­: During a 4.5-year period involving 58 patients, we compared the following 4 groups: heterozygous for FVL (FVL-HET)/taking apixaban, wild-type/taking apixaban, heterozygous for FVL/no apixaban, and normal APCR/no apixaban. Patients taking apixaban were also tested for protein S functional activity and free antigen (n = 40). RESULTS.­: FVL-HET patients taking apixaban had lower APCR ratios than wild-type patients (P < .001). Activated protein C resistance in FVL-HET patients taking apixaban fell more than 3 SD below the cutoff of 2.2 at which the laboratory reflexes FVL DNA testing. No cases of FVL were missed despite apixaban. In contrast to rivaroxaban, apixaban did not interfere with the assessment of protein S activity (mean activity 93.9 IU/dL, free antigen 93.1 IU/dL, P = .39). A total of 3 of 40 patients (8%) had low free protein S antigen (30, 55, and 57 IU/dL), with correspondingly similar activity results (27, 59, and 52 IU/dL, respectively). Apixaban did not cause a missed diagnosis of protein S deficiency. CONCLUSIONS.­: Despite apixaban treatment, APCR testing can distinguish FVL-HET from healthy patients, rendering indiscriminate FVL DNA testing of all patients on apixaban unnecessary. Apixaban did not affect protein S activity.

[Retinal artery occlusion and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy associated with factor V Leiden mutation: A case report]. / Occlusion de l'artère centrale de la rétine associée à une neuropathie optique ischémique antérieure secondaire à une mutation du facteur V Leiden : à propos d'un cas.

Factor V is a pro-coagulant cofactor required for the transformation of prothrombin into thrombin. Thrombin activates factor V, which is then deactivated by protein C. A mutation in factor V is responsible for the formation of factor V Leiden, resistant to activated protein C. The association of this mutation with venous thromboses has been established. Its association with arterial occlusions is still controversial. We report the case of a central retinal artery occlusion associated with a non-arteritic anterior optic neuropathy associated with a Leiden mutation of factor V (FVL). The presence of FVL has been associated with lack of reperfusion and rapid progression to neovascularization. It seems that FVL intervenes mainly during the reperfusion phase after the occurrence of arterial thrombosis.

Proof of concept of a new scale for the harmonization and the standardization of the ETP-based APC resistance.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the activated protein C resistance (APCr) based on the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) is recommended during the development of steroid contraceptives. Results are usually expressed as "normalized APC sensitivity ratio" (nAPCsr) using a reference plasma that should achieve an ETP ratio of 0.1 in presence of exogenous APC. Because of the interassay variability, achieving exactly an ETP ratio of 0.1 in each run is almost impossible, which significantly affects the theoretical 0-10 scale of nAPCsr. OBJECTIVES: To compare the nAPCsr to the nAPCsr10 , a newly proposed method to express the degree of APC resistance. METHODS: Individual plasma samples (n = 854) were analyzed to compare nAPCsr and nAPCsr10 . These values were obtained using the validated ETP-based APCr assay. RESULTS: The Spearman correlation between nAPCsr and nAPCsr10 had a coefficient of 0.99. Linear regression showed the following equation y = 0.9315*x + 0.03942 (r2  = .97). When differences (nAPCsr10 - nAPCsr) were plotted against nAPCsr10 , the mean difference equaled 0.16% or 4.95%. The correction obtained with the use of the nAPCsr10 showed that the results of the nAPCsr were statistically different (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This new scale provides a harmonization and normalization of the nAPCsr. Results show a better reproducibility with the nAPCsr10 . It avoids the additional variability and the unharmonized scale introduced by the use of a reference plasma. This adapted method for the calculation of the APC resistance could provide the regulatory and scientific bodies with more reproducible and harmonized evaluations.

Validation and standardization of the ETP-based activated protein C resistance test for the clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in women: an unmet clinical and regulatory need.

Background Regulatory bodies recommend the use of an assay based on the assessment of the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) for the investigation of the activated protein C resistance (APCr) in the development of steroid contraceptives in women. However, the assays described in the literature are home-made and not standardized regarding the method, the reagents, the reference plasma and the quality controls. In the absence of any commercially available method, we aimed at validating the ETP-based APCr assay. Methods The validation was performed according to regulatory standards. The method targets a 90% inhibition of the ETP in healthy donors in the presence of APC compared to the same condition in the absence of APC. As a large-scale production of a pool of plasma from well-selected healthy donors is impossible, algorithms were applied to a commercial reference plasma to correlate with the selected pool. Results Repeatability and intermediate precision passed the acceptance criteria. The assay demonstrated a curvilinear dose response to protein S and APC concentrations (R2 > 0.99). Analysis of plasma samples from 47 healthy individuals (22 women not taking combined hormonal contraceptives [CHC], and 25 men not Factor V Leiden carriers) confirmed the validity of the test, with a mean inhibition percentage of 90%. Investigations in 15 women taking different contraceptives and in two subjects with Factor V Leiden confirmed the good sensitivity and performance of the assay. Conclusions This validation provides the pharmaceutical industry, the regulatory bodies and physicians with a reproducible, sensitive and validated gold-standard ETP-based APCr assay.

Danger of false negative (exclusion) or false positive (diagnosis) for 'congenital thrombophilia' in the age of anticoagulants.

Background Most guidelines and experts recommend against performance of thrombophilia testing in general, and specifically against testing patients on pharmacological anticoagulants, due to substantially increased risk of false positive identification. For example, vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy affects protein C (PC) and protein S (PS), as well as some clotting assays (e.g. as used to investigate activated PC resistance [APCR]). Although heparin may also affect clotting assays, most commercial methods contain neutralisers to make them 'insensitive' to therapeutic levels. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) also affect a wide variety of thrombophilia assays, although most reported data has employed artificial in vitro spiked samples. Methods In the current report, data from our facility for the past 2.5 years has been assessed for all 'congenital thrombophilia' related tests, as evaluated against patient anticoagulant status. We processed 10,571 'thrombophilia' related test requests, including antithrombin (AT; n=3470), PC (n=3569), PS (n=3585), APCR (n=2359), factor V Leiden (FVL; n=2659), and prothrombin gene mutation (PGM; n=2103). Results As expected, VKA therapy affected PC and PS, and despite manufacturer claims, also APCR. Most assays, as suggested by manufacturers, were largely resistant to heparin therapy. DOACs' use was associated with falsely low APCR ratios (i.e. FVL-like effect) and somewhat unexpectedly, anti-Xa agents apixaban and rivaroxaban were also associated with lower AT and higher PS values. Conclusions It is concluded that ex-vivo data appears to confirm the potential for both false positive and false negative 'thrombophilia' events in patients on anticoagulant (including DOAC) treatment.

Comparison of Phenotypic Activated Protein C Resistance Testing With a Genetic Assay for Factor V Leiden.

Objectives: To compare the accuracy and reliability of phenotypic activated protein C resistance (aPC-R) assays with a genotypic assay for the factor V Leiden F5 p.R506Q (FVL) mutation. Methods: Data were obtained from an electronic data warehouse for FVL testing performed at an academic institution with a large referral laboratory service. In total, 1,596 patients were identified who had undergone both phenotypic aPC-R and genotypic FVL mutation testing. Results: Phenotypic testing showed a high level of sensitivity, specificity, and other biostatistical values compared with genotypic testing. Improvements in technology decreased the amount of equivocal phenotypic results. Conclusions: Phenotypic assays had close to total concordance with genotypic assays over 16 years of testing. Changing ordering practices could result in up to an 80% reduction in testing costs.

[Thrombophilia in systemic lupus erythematosus: A case-control study]. / Les marqueurs de thrombophilie au cours du lupus érythémateux systémique : une étude cas-témoin.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the thrombotic tendency in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by evaluating congenital and acquired abnormalities with an increased risk of thrombosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 53 patients with SLE were included in the study. Fifty-three healthy controls paired by age and sex were assessed. Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti ß2 glycoprotein (aß2GP), lupus anticoagulant (LAC), protein C (PC), protein S (PS), antithrombin (AT), acquired activated protein C, and homocysteinemia were evaluated. Comparisons for categorical variables were analyzed by Chi2 and student tests. RESULTS: The patients were all female and had a mean age of 30.6 years (16/58). The healthy controls were all female and their mean age was 30.8 years (17/56). Five patients (9.4%) developed venous thrombosis during the 24 months of follow-up. The antiphospholipid antibodies were positive in 17 patients (32.1%) and negative in all healthy controls (P=0.01). PS deficiency was noted in 17 patients (32.1%) and in 5 controls (P=0.004). Hyperhomocysteinemia was noted in 16 patients (30.2%) versus 3 controls (5.6%) (P=0.002). Test for PC deficiency and acquired activated protein C showed no significant difference between the two groups. No AT deficiency was found in the patients. The study of clinical and biological correlations based on the presence and absence of thrombophilic parameters concluded to a significant association between Protein C deficit and thrombosis (P=0.02) and acquired activated protein C resistance and thrombosis (P=0.04). There was no significant association between the APL and thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Thrombophilic abnormalities were significantly more frequent in lupus patients than in healthy controls. Thrombotic events were significantly associated with PC deficit and acquired protein C resistance. There was no correlation between antiphospholipid antibodies and thrombosis.

Rivaroxaban Causes Missed Diagnosis of Protein S Deficiency but Not of Activated Protein C Resistance (Factor V Leiden).

CONTEXT: - Rivaroxaban causes a false increase in activated protein C resistance (APCR) ratios and protein S activity. OBJECTIVE: - To investigate whether this increase masks a diagnosis of factor V Leiden (FVL) or protein S deficiency in a "real-world" population of patients undergoing rivaroxaban treatment and hypercoagulation testing. DESIGN: - During a 2.5-year period, we compared 4 groups of patients (n = 60): FVL heterozygous (FVL-HET)/taking rivaroxaban, wild-type/taking rivaroxaban, FVL-HET/no rivaroxaban, and normal APCR/no rivaroxaban. Patients taking rivaroxaban were tested for protein S functional activity and free antigen (n = 32). RESULTS: - The FVL-HET patients taking rivaroxaban had lower APCR ratios than wild-type patients ( P < .001). For FVL-HET patients taking rivaroxaban, mean APCR was 1.75 ± 0.12, versus 1.64 ± 0.3 in FVL-HET patients not taking rivaroxaban ( P = .005). Activated protein C resistance in FVL-HET patients fell more than 3 SDs below the cutoff of 2.2 at which the laboratory reflexes FVL DNA testing. No cases of FVL were missed despite rivaroxaban. In contrast, rivaroxaban falsely elevated functional protein S activity, regardless of the presence or absence of FVL ( P < .001). A total of 4 of 32 patients (12.5%) had low free protein S antigen (range, 58%-67%), whereas their functional protein S activity appeared normal (range 75%-130%). Rivaroxaban would have caused a missed diagnosis of all cases of protein S deficiency during the study if testing relied on the protein S activity assay alone. CONCLUSIONS: - Despite rivaroxaban treatment, APCR testing can distinguish FVL-HET from normal patients, rendering indiscriminate FVL DNA testing of all patients on rivaroxaban unnecessary. Free protein S should be tested in patients taking rivaroxaban to exclude hereditary protein S deficiency.