Mean Airway Pressure As a Predictor of 90-Day Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between mean airway pressure and 90-day mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and to compare the predictive ability of mean airway pressure compared with inspiratory plateau pressure and driving pressure. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Five ICUs in Lima, Peru. SUBJECTS: Adults requiring invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube for acute respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of potentially eligible participants (n = 1,500), 65 (4%) were missing baseline mean airway pressure, while 352 (23.5%) were missing baseline plateau pressure and driving pressure. Ultimately, 1,429 participants were included in the analysis with an average age of 59 ± 19 years, 45% female, and a mean PaO2/FIO2 ratio of 248 ± 147 mm Hg at baseline. Overall, 90-day mortality was 50.4%. Median baseline mean airway pressure was 13 cm H2O (interquartile range, 10-16 cm H2O) in participants who died compared to a median mean airway pressure of 12 cm H2O (interquartile range, 10-14 cm H2O) in participants who survived greater than 90 days (p < 0.001). Mean airway pressure was independently associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.38 for difference comparing the 75th to the 25th percentile for mean airway pressure; 95% CI, 1.10-1.74) after adjusting for age, sex, baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, baseline PaO2/FIO2 (modeled with restricted cubic spline), baseline positive end-expiratory pressure, baseline tidal volume, and hospital site. In predicting 90-day mortality, baseline mean airway pressure demonstrated similar discriminative ability (adjusted area under the curve = 0.69) and calibration characteristics as baseline plateau pressure and driving pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter prospective cohort, baseline mean airway pressure was independently associated with 90-day mortality in mechanically ventilated participants and predicts mortality similarly to plateau pressure and driving pressure. Because mean airway pressure is readily available on all mechanically ventilated patients and all ventilator modes, it is a potentially more useful predictor of mortality in acute respiratory failure.

Expiratory Flow Limitation During Mechanical Ventilation.

Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) is present when the flow cannot rise despite an increase in the expiratory driving pressure. The mechanisms of EFL are debated but are believed to be related to the collapsibility of small airways. In patients who are mechanically ventilated, EFL can exist during tidal ventilation, representing an extreme situation in which lung volume cannot decrease, regardless of the expiratory driving forces. It is a key factor for the generation of auto- or intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and requires specific management such as positioning and adjustment of external PEEP. EFL can be responsible for causing dyspnea and patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, and it is influenced by the fluid status of the patient. EFL frequently affects patients with COPD, obesity, and heart failure, as well as patients with ARDS, especially at low PEEP. EFL is, however, most often unrecognized in the clinical setting despite being associated with complications of mechanical ventilation and poor outcomes such as postoperative pulmonary complications, extubation failure, and possibly airway injury in ARDS. Therefore, prompt recognition might help the management of patients being mechanically ventilated who have EFL and could potentially influence outcome. EFL can be suspected by using different means, and this review summarizes the methods to specifically detect EFL during mechanical ventilation.

Driving Pressure and Hospital Mortality in Patients Without ARDS: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Driving pressure (ΔP) is associated with mortality in patients with ARDS and with pulmonary complications in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Whether ΔP is associated with outcomes of patients without ARDS who undergo ventilation in the ICU is unknown. Our objective was to determine the independent association between ΔP and outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients without ARDS on day 1 of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 622 mechanically ventilated adult patients without ARDS on day 1 of mechanical ventilation from five ICUs in a tertiary center in the United States. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The presence of ARDS was determined using the minimum daily Pao2 to Fio2 (PF) ratio and an automated text search of chest radiography reports. The data set was validated by first testing the model in 543 patients with ARDS. RESULTS: In patients without ARDS on day 1 of mechanical ventilation, ΔP was not independently associated with hospital mortality (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97-1.05). The results of the primary analysis were confirmed in a series of preplanned sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients without ARDS on day 1 of mechanical ventilation and within the limits of ventilatory settings normally used by clinicians, ΔP was not associated with hospital mortality. This study also confirms the association between ΔP and mortality in patients with ARDS not enrolled in a trial and in hypoxemic patients without ARDS.

Assessment of Factors Related to Auto-PEEP.

BACKGROUND: Previous physiological studies have identified factors that are involved in auto-PEEP generation. In our study, we examined how much auto-PEEP is generated from factors that are involved in its development. METHODS: One hundred eighty-six subjects undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation with persistent expiratory flow at the beginning of each inspiration were enrolled in the study. Volume-controlled continuous mandatory ventilation with PEEP of 0 cm H2O was applied while maintaining the ventilator setting as chosen by the attending physician. End-expiratory and end-inspiratory airway occlusion maneuvers were performed to calculate respiratory mechanics, and tidal flow limitation was assessed by a maneuver of manual compression of the abdomen. RESULTS: The variable with the strongest effect on auto-PEEP was flow limitation, which was associated with an increase of 2.4 cm H2O in auto-PEEP values. Moreover, auto-PEEP values were directly related to resistance of the respiratory system and body mass index and inversely related to expiratory time/time constant. Variables that were associated with the breathing pattern (tidal volume, frequency minute ventilation, and expiratory time) did not show any relationship with auto-PEEP values. The risk of auto-PEEP ≥5 cm H2O was increased by flow limitation (adjusted odds ratio 17; 95% CI: 6-56.2), expiratory time/time constant ratio <1.85 (12.6; 4.7-39.6), respiratory system resistance >15 cm H2O/L s (3; 1.3-6.9), age >65 y (2.8; 1.2-6.5), and body mass index >26 kg/m(2) (2.6; 1.1-6.1). CONCLUSIONS: Flow limitation, expiratory time/time constant, resistance of the respiratory system, and obesity are the most important variables that affect auto-PEEP values. Frequency expiratory time, tidal volume, and minute ventilation were not independently associated with auto-PEEP. Therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing auto-PEEP and its adverse effects should be primarily oriented to the variables that mainly affect auto-PEEP values.

Role of nasal positive end expiratory pressure valve as an alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea in Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: As compliance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is often suboptimal, a less cumbersome treatment is desirable. We explored the clinical usefulness of nasal positive end expiratory pressure (nPEEP) valves. METHODS: Symptomatic OSA patients (apnoea hypopnea index (AHI) >5/h by polysomnography (PSG) or >10/h by type III devices), who declined CPAP, were recruited. A nPEEP valve was attached to each nostril before bed. After successful acclimatization for 1 week, treatment was continued for 4 weeks. The nPEEP valves provided expiratory resistance to build up PEEP. PSG was performed at week 4. RESULTS: Among 196 subjects, 46 (23%) failed acclimatization and 14 (7%) withdrew. Among the 120 patients with a valid PSG, 72 (60%) and 75 (63%) had >50% reduction in mean (standard deviation) overall AHI 26 (16)/h to 18 (18)/h and mean supine AHI 31 (19)/h to 11(16)/h, respectively, P < 0.001. Compared with responders, patients with <50% reduction in AHI had a higher mean overall AHI (30/h vs 23/h, P = 0.03), higher mean supine AHI (35/h vs 26/h, P = 0.04), more severe mean oxygen desaturation nadir (76.7% vs 82.7%, P < 0.01) and longer mean period of desaturation <90% SaO2 (7.7 vs 2.4, P = 0.02). Breathing discomfort and dry mouth were the most common side effects. Compared with a dental device, there was a larger mean reduction in supine AHI using nPEEP (29 (14)/h vs 16 (17)/h). CONCLUSION: nPEEP valves were useful in selected patients with mild or positional-related OSA.

A 40 años de la descripción del índice de Kirby (PaO2/FiO2) / Forty years since description of the Kirby index (PaO2/FiO2)

No disponible

Dynamic laryngeal narrowing during exercise: a mechanism for generating intrinsic PEEP in COPD?

INTRODUCTION: Patients with COPD commonly exhibit pursed-lip breathing during exercise, a strategy that, by increasing intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, may optimise lung mechanics and exercise tolerance. A similar role for laryngeal narrowing in modulating exercise airways resistance and the respiratory cycle volume-time course is postulated, yet remains unstudied in COPD. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics of laryngeal narrowing and its role in exercise intolerance and dynamic hyperinflation in COPD. METHODS: We studied 19 patients (n=8 mild-moderate; n=11 severe COPD) and healthy age and sex matched controls (n=11). Baseline physiological characteristics and clinical status were assessed prior to an incremental maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test with continuous laryngoscopy. Laryngeal narrowing measures were calculated at the glottic and supra-glottic aperture at rest and peak exercise. RESULTS: At rest, expiratory laryngeal narrowing was pronounced at the glottic level in patients and related to FEV1 in the whole cohort (r=-0.71, p<0.001) and patients alone (r=-0.53, p=0.018). During exercise, glottic narrowing was inversely related to peak ventilation in all subjects (r=-0.55, p=0.0015) and patients (r=-0.71, p<0.001) and peak exercise tidal volume (r=-0.58, p=0.0062 and r=-0.55, p=0.0076, respectively). Exercise glottic narrowing was also inversely related to peak oxygen uptake (% predicted) in all subjects (r=-0.65, p<0.001) and patients considered alone (r=-0.58, p=0.014). Exercise inspiratory duty cycle was related to exercise glottic narrowing for all subjects (r=-0.69, p<0.001) and patients (r=-0.62, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic laryngeal narrowing during expiration is prevalent in patients with COPD and is related to disease severity, respiratory duty cycle and exercise capacity.

Hemodynamic consequences of auto-PEEP.

Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a common but frequently unrecognized problem in critically ill patients. It has important physiologic consequences and can cause shock and cardiac arrest. Treatment consists of relieving expiratory airflow obstruction and reducing minute ventilation delivered by positive pressure ventilation. Sedation and fluid management are important adjunctive therapies. This analytic review discusses the prevalence, pathophysiology, and hemodynamic consequences of auto-PEEP and an approach to its treatment.

Importance of slow vital capacity in the detection of airway obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of airway obstruction by determining the FEV1/FVC and FEV1/slow vital capacity (SVC) ratios. METHODS: This was a quantitative, retrospective cross-sectional study. The sample comprised 1,084 individuals who underwent spirometry and plethysmography in a central hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. The study sample was stratified into six groups, by pulmonary function. RESULTS: The analysis of the FEV1/FVC ratio revealed the presence of airway obstruction in 476 individuals (43.9%), compared with 566 individuals (52.2%) for the analysis of the FEV1/SVC ratio. In the airway obstruction, airway obstruction plus lung hyperinflation, and mixed pattern groups, the difference between SVC and FVC (SVC - FVC) was statistically superior to that in the normal pulmonary function, reduced FEF, and restrictive lung disease groups. The SVC - FVC parameter showed a significant negative correlation with FEV1 (in % of the predicted value) only in the airway obstruction plus lung hyperinflation group. CONCLUSIONS: The FEV1/SVC ratio detected the presence of airway obstruction in more individuals than did the FEV1/FVC ratio; that is, the FEV1/SVC ratio is more reliable than is the FEV1/FVC ratio in the detection of obstructive pulmonary disease.

Importance of slow vital capacity in the detection of airway obstruction / Importância da capacidade vital lenta na detecção de obstrução das vias aéreas

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of airway obstruction by determining the FEV1/FVC and FEV1/slow vital capacity (SVC) ratios. METHODS: This was a quantitative, retrospective cross-sectional study. The sample comprised 1,084 individuals who underwent spirometry and plethysmography in a central hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. The study sample was stratified into six groups, by pulmonary function. RESULTS: The analysis of the FEV1/FVC ratio revealed the presence of airway obstruction in 476 individuals (43.9%), compared with 566 individuals (52.2%) for the analysis of the FEV1/SVC ratio. In the airway obstruction, airway obstruction plus lung hyperinflation, and mixed pattern groups, the difference between SVC and FVC (SVC − FVC) was statistically superior to that in the normal pulmonary function, reduced FEF, and restrictive lung disease groups. The SVC − FVC parameter showed a significant negative correlation with FEV1 (in % of the predicted value) only in the airway obstruction plus lung hyperinflation group. CONCLUSIONS: The FEV1/SVC ratio detected the presence of airway obstruction in more individuals than did the FEV1/FVC ratio; that is, the FEV1/SVC ratio is more reliable than is the FEV1/FVC ratio in the detection of obstructive pulmonary disease. .

OBJETIVO: Investigar a ocorrência de obstrução das vias aéreas por meio da relação VEF1/CVF e da relação VEF1/capacidade vital lenta (CVL). MÉTODOS: Estudo do tipo quantitativo, retrospectivo e transversal. A amostra foi constituída por 1.084 indivíduos que realizaram espirometria e pletismografia num hospital central da região de Lisboa, Portugal. A amostra foi estratificada em seis grupos funcionais respiratórios. RESULTADOS: A análise da relação VEF1/CVF revelou a presença de obstrução das vias aéreas em 476 indivíduos (43,9%), enquanto a relação VEF1/CVL detectou a presença dessa em 566 indivíduos (52,2%). A diferença entre a CVL e a CVF (CVL − CVF) nos grupos relativos à obstrução brônquica, à obstrução brônquica com hiperinsuflação pulmonar e à alteração ventilatória mista foi estatisticamente superior àquela encontrada nos grupos sem alteração ventilatória, com diminuição dos FEFs e com restrição pulmonar. O parâmetro CVL − CVF apresentou correlação negativa significativa com VEF1 em % do previsto apenas no grupo com obstrução brônquica com hiperinsuflação pulmonar. CONCLUSÕES: A relação VEF1/CVL detectou a presença de obstrução das vias aéreas em um número maior de indivíduos que a relação VEF1/CVF, ou seja, a relação VEF1/CVL é mais confiável na detecção de alterações ventilatórias obstrutivas. .

State of the evidence: mechanical ventilation with PEEP in patients with cardiogenic shock.

The need to provide invasive mechanical ventilatory support to patients with myocardial infarction and acute left heart failure is common. Despite the large number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation in this setting, there are remarkably few data addressing the ideal mode of respiratory support in such patients. Although there is near universal acceptance regarding the use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute pulmonary oedema, there is more concern with invasive positive pressure ventilation owing to its more significant haemodynamic impact. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is almost universally applied in mechanically ventilated patients due to benefits in gas exchange, recruitment of alveolar units, counterbalance of hydrostatic forces leading to pulmonary oedema and maintenance of airway patency. The limited available clinical data suggest that a moderate level of PEEP is safe to use in severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and cardiogenic shock, and may provide haemodynamic benefits as well in LV failure which exhibits afterload-sensitive physiology.

[Ventilation strategies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. / Beatmungsstrategien bei chronisch obstruktiver Lungenerkrankung.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered to be one of the most frequent pulmonary diseases in industrialized countries. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the first choice therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (AE-COPD). Effective delivery of NIV requires a specialized interdisciplinary team with sufficient monitoring. NIV is delivered as assisted positive pressure ventilation where high inspiratory flow and peak pressure are required. The external positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) should be adjusted to the intrinsic PEEP. Criteria of success are improvement in the clinical, especially neurological condition as well as improvement of pH and PaCO(2). Patients with a pH between 7.25 and 7.35 have demonstrated most benefit from NIV. In cases of patients not responding to NIV endotracheal intubation should be initiated in a timely manner. Assisted ventilation modes are preferred over controlled ventilation modes in intubated COPD patients. Settings of respirators have to be aimed at a reduction of intrinsic PEEP and dynamic hyperinflation. This includes sufficient external PEEP, long expiration times and low respiratory frequencies even allowing for permissive hypercapnia.

Respiratory mechanics in COPD patients who failed non-invasive ventilation: role of intrinsic PEEP.

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is the first choice to treat exacerbations in COPD patients. NPPV can fail owing to different causes related to gas exchange impairment (RF group) or intolerance (INT group). To assess if the respiratory mechanical properties and the ratio between the dynamic and static intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP(i),dyn/PEEP(i),stat), reflecting lung mechanical inequalities, were different between groups, 29 COPD patients who failed NPPV (15 RF and 14 INT) were studied, early after the application of invasive ventilation. Blood gas analysis, clinical status, and mechanical properties were measured. pH was higher in INT patients before intubation (p<0.001). PEEP(i),dyn/PEEP(i),stat was found higher in INT group with (p=0.021) and without PEEP (ZEEP, p<0.01). PEEP(i),dyn/PEEP(i),stat was exponentially associated with the duration of NPPV in INT group (p=0.011). INT and RF patients had similar impairment of respiratory system resistance and elastance.

Auto-PEEP in respiratory failure.

Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) is a common occurrence in patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Auto-PEEP can cause severe respiratory and hemodynamic compromise. The presence of auto-PEEP should be suspected when airflow at end-exhalation is not zero. In patients receiving controlled mechanical ventilation, auto-PEEP can be estimated measuring the rise in airway pressure during an end-expiratory occlusion maneuver. In patients who trigger the ventilator or who are not connected to a ventilator, auto-PEEP can be estimated by simultaneous recordings of airflow and airway and esophageal pressure, respectively. The best technique to accurately measure auto-PEEP in patients who actively recruit their expiratory muscle remains controversial. Strategies that may reduce auto-PEEP include reduction of minute ventilation, use of small tidal volumes and prolongation of the time available for exhalation. In patients in whom auto-PEEP is caused by expiratory flow limitation, the application of low-levels of external PEEP can reduce dyspnea, reduce work of breathing, improve patient-ventilator interaction and cardiac function, all without worsening hyperinflation. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, a novel strategy of ventilatory assist, may improve patient-ventilator interaction in patients with auto-PEEP.

Ventilación mecánica invasiva en EPOC y asma / Invasive mechanical ventilation in COPD and asthma

Los pacientes con EPOC y asmáticos utilizan una proporción sustancial de ventilación mecánica en la UCI, y su mortalidad global en tratamiento con ventilación mecánica puede ser significativa. Desde el punto de vista fisiopatológico, muestran un incremento de la resistencia de la vía aérea, hiperinsuflación pulmonar y elevado espacio muerto anatómico, lo que conduce a un mayor trabajo respiratorio. Si la demanda ventilatoria sobrepasa la capacidad de la musculatura respiratoria, se producirá el fracaso respiratorio agudo.El principal objetivo de la ventilación mecánica en este tipo de pacientes es proporcionar una mejora en el intercambio gaseoso, así como el suficiente descanso para la musculatura respiratoria tras un periodo de agotamiento. La evidencia actual apoya el uso de la ventilación mecánica no invasiva en estos pacientes (especialmente en la EPOC), pero con frecuencia se precisa de la ventilación mecánica invasiva para los pacientes con enfermedad más severa. El clínico debe ser muy cauto para evitar complicaciones relacionadas con la ventilación mecánica durante el soporte ventilatorio. Una causa mayor de morbilidad y mortalidad en estos pacientes es la excesiva hiperinsuflación dinámica pulmonar con presión positiva al final de la espiración (PEEP intrínseca o auto-PEEP). El objetivo de este artículo es proporcionar una concisa actualización de los aspectos más relevantes para el óptimo manejo ventilatorio en estos pacientes (AU)

COPD and asthmatic patients use a substantial proportion of mechanical ventilationin the ICU, and their overall mortality with ventilatory support can be significant. From the pathophysiologicalstandpoint, they have increased airway resistance, pulmonary hyperinflation,and high pulmonary dead space, leading to increased work of breathing. If ventilatory demandexceeds work output of the respiratory muscles, acute respiratory failure follows. The main goal of mechanical ventilation in this kind of patients is to improve pulmonary gasexchange and to allow for sufficient rest of compromised respiratory muscles to recover fromthe fatigued state. The current evidence supports the use of noninvasive positive-pressureventilation for these patients (especially in COPD), but invasive ventilation also is requiredfrequently in patients who have more severe disease. The physician must be cautious to avoidcomplications related to mechanical ventilation during ventilatory support. One major cause ofthe morbidity and mortality arising during mechanical ventilation in these patients is excessivedynamic pulmonary hyperinflation (DH) with intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (intrinsicPEEP or auto-PEEP). The purpose of this article is to provide a concise update of the mostrelevant aspects for the optimal ventilatory management in these patients (AU)