Sugammadex and urinary retention after hysterectomy: A propensity-matched cohort study.

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a well-known complication after gynecologic surgery. Our objective was to investigate whether the choice of pharmacologic agent for reversing neuromuscular blockade at the end of a hysterectomy is a risk factor for POUR. Among adult patients undergoing hysterectomy with general anesthesia from 2012 to 2017, those who received aminosteroid nondepolarizing neuromuscular agents followed by pharmacologic reversal were identified, and electronic health records were reviewed. The cohort was dichotomized into two groups by reversal agent: 1) sugammadex and 2) neostigmine with glycopyrrolate. The primary outcome, POUR, was defined as unplanned postoperative bladder recatheterization. A propensity-adjusted analysis was performed to investigate the association between POUR and reversal agent by using inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for potential confounders. We identified 1,974 patients, of whom 1,586 (80.3%) received neostigmine-glycopyrrolate and 388 (19.7%) received sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The frequency of POUR was 24.8% (393/1,586) after reversal with neostigmine-glycopyrrolate and 18.3% (71/388) with sugammadex. Results from the propensity-adjusted analysis showed that sugammadex was associated with a lower POUR risk than neostigmine-glycopyrrolate (odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37 - 0.76, P < 0.001). A post hoc analysis of sugammadex recipients who received glycopyrrolate for another indication showed a higher POUR risk than among those who did not receive glycopyrrolate (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.07 - 3.22, P = 0.03). Use of sugammadex to reverse aminosteroid neuromuscular blocking agents is associated with decreased risk of POUR after hysterectomy. A potential mechanism is the omission of glycopyrrolate, which is coadministered with neostigmine to mitigate unwanted cholinergic effects.

Post-operative urinary retention is impacted by neuromuscular block reversal agent choice: A retrospective cohort study in US hospital setting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Perioperative neuromuscular blocking agents are pharmacologically reversed to minimize complications associated with residual neuromuscular block. Neuromuscular block reversal with anticholinesterases (e.g., neostigmine) require coadministration of an anticholinergic agent (e.g., glycopyrrolate) to mitigate muscarinic activity; however, sugammadex, devoid of cholinergic activity, does not require anticholinergic coadministration. Single-institution studies have found decreased incidence of post-operative urinary retention associated with sugammadex reversal. This study used a multicenter database to better understand the association between neuromuscular block reversal technique and post-operative urinary retention. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study utilizing large healthcare database. SETTING: Non-profit, non-governmental and community and teaching hospitals and health systems from rural and urban areas. PATIENTS: 61,898 matched adult inpatients and 95,500 matched adult outpatients. INTERVENTIONS: Neuromuscular block reversal with sugammadex or neostigmine plus glycopyrrolate. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence of post-operative urinary retention by neuromuscular block reversal agent and the independent association of neuromuscular block reversal technique and risk of post-operative urinary retention. MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of post-operative urinary retention was 2-fold greater among neostigmine with glycopyrrolate compared to sugammadex patients (5.0% vs 2.4% inpatients; 0.9% vs 0.4% outpatients; both p < 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified reversal with neostigmine to be independently associated with greater risk of post-operative urinary retention (inpatients: odds ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 2.00 to 2.41; p < 0.001; outpatients: odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 2.13 to 3.10; p < 0.001). Post-operative urinary retention-related visits within 2 days following discharge were five-fold higher among those reversed with neostigmine than sugammadex among inpatients (0.05% vs. 0.01%, respectively; p = 0.018) and outpatients (0.5% vs. 0.1%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Though this study suggests that neuromuscular block reversal with neostigmine can increase post-operative urinary retention risk, additional studies are needed to fully understand the association.

Effects and Limitations of Naldemedine for Opioid-Induced Urinary Retention: A Case Report.

A 78-year-old man with postoperative recurrence of esophageal cancer was admitted to the hospital due to chest pain and dyspnea. Oral short-acting opioids provided some relief, but chest pain persisted and worsened, leading to the initiation of a transdermal fentanyl patch. However, the patient developed opioid-induced urinary retention, which was treated with a naldemedine, a medication used for opioid-induced constipation and urinary retention. Opioid switching led to recurrent urinary retention, requiring placement of a urinary catheter. The patient ultimately required continuous deep sedation for refractory symptoms and died several days later.

Urinary retention and mydriasis secondary to topical glycopyrronium for axillary hyperhidrosis.

PURPOSE: Glycopyrronium, also known as glycopyrrolate, is an antimuscarinic competitive inhibitor of acetylcholine widely utilized topically for its anticholinergic properties in dermatology. A single topical glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) formulation is available on the market, and prescription of this medication has become increasingly popular among dermatologists. This medication has a relatively notable adverse effect profile and carries risks that patients need to be counseled on before initiation. SUMMARY: A 22-year-old female presented to our emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of difficulty urinating for 48 hours and blurred vision for 2 weeks. Over the course of a week, she visited the ED once and urgent care multiple times due to complications associated with combination use of GT and cetirizine. Although these clinical effects were reversible, the patient impact in our case was profound given the time, cost, and invasive nature of these visits. CONCLUSION: The notable adverse effects of GT should be considered when prescribing this agent.

Analysis of Urinary Retention Caused by Selective ß 3-adrenoceptor Agonists Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database (JADER).

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a frequent chronic disorder which impairs quality of life by frequent, uncontrollable urination. Newly developed selectiveß 3-adrenoceptor agonists (sß 3-agonists) have the same efficacy in treating OAB but significantly fewer side effects than the traditionally used anti-muscarinics. However, safety data on these compounds are scarce. In this study, we analysed the occurrence of adverse effects in patients taking sß 3-agonists and their characteristics using the JADER database. The most frequently reported adverse effect associated with the use of sß 3-agonists was urinary retention [mirabegron; crude reporting odds ratios (ROR): 62.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.0-73.6, P<0.001, vibegron; crude ROR: 250, 95% CI : 134-483, P<0.001]. Data from patients with urinary retention were stratified by sex. In both men and women, the rate of urinary retention was higher when using the mirabegron/anti-muscarinic drug when compared to mirabegron monotherapy; its occurrence was higher in men with a history of benign prostatic hypertrophy than in those without. Weibull analysis showed that approximately 50% of sß 3 agonist-induced urinary retention occurred within 15 days after initiation of treatment, and then gradually decreased. Although sß 3-agonists are useful against OAB, they may induce several side effects, especially urinary retention, which can further evolve into more severe conditions. Urinary retention occurs more frequently in patients concomitantly taking medication that either increases urethral resistance or has organic factors that block the urethra. When using sß 3-agonists, the concomitantly used medications and underlying diseases should be thoroughly reviewed, and safety monitoring should be instituted early during the treatment.

Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Comparative Rates of Transient Neurological Symptoms and Urinary Retention Using Lidocaine, Mepivacaine, and Bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Short-acting spinal anesthetics enable rapid recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty; however, concerns with transient neurological symptoms (TNS) cause some to avoid using lidocaine. Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is also a concern with spinal anesthesia. We sought to study the comparative rates of TNS and POUR between lidocaine, mepivacaine, and bupivacaine in a high-volume hip and knee arthroplasty setting. METHODS: Data for 1,217 primary THA, TKA, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty cases were reviewed and grouped by spinal anesthetic agent (lidocaine, mepivacaine, or bupivacaine). Of the 1,217 cases, utilization was 523 lidocaine, 573 mepivacaine, and 121 bupivacaine. The incidence of TNS and POUR requiring catheterization was measured both by clinical evaluation as well as a questionnaire sent to patients 14 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The overall rate of TNS was 8%. With the numbers available, there was no difference in rates of TNS between groups (6.9% lidocaine, 9.2% mepivacaine, and 4.1% bupivacaine; P = .297). There was no difference in rates of TNS or POUR between THA and TKA/unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bupivacaine had a significantly higher rate of urinary retention (9.1%; P < .001) than mepivacaine (2.8%) or lidocaine (1.5%). CONCLUSION: This study showed no difference in the rate of TNS between the 3 common agents used in spinal anesthesia. Short-acting spinal anesthetics such as lidocaine and mepivacaine can lower the rate of POUR requiring catheterization, helping to enable rapid recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty.

Effect of Pharmacotherapy for Overactive Bladder on the Incidence of and Factors Related to Urinary Tract Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder on the pathogenesis of urinary tract infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library using terms for overactive bladder, antimuscarinic agents, and beta 3-adrenoceptor agonists. The primary end point was the emergence of urinary tract infection after pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder. The secondary end point was the emergence of urinary retention, dysuria, and/or increased residual urine volume after overactive bladder treatment. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 35,939 patients in 33 trials (29 trials of antimuscarinic agents vs placebo, and 9 trials of beta 3-adrenoceptor agonists vs placebo) that included patients with overactive bladder were identified. At 1-3 months after treatment, the incidence of urinary tract infections was statistically significantly higher in the patients treated with antimuscarinic agents (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.45; P = .013) than in the placebo control group. The incidence of urinary tract infections was not increased in the patients treated with beta 3-adrenoceptor agonists (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76, 1.42; P = .796). Antimuscarinic agents also statistically significantly increased the risks of urinary retention, dysuria, and/or increased residual urine volume (RR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.79, 4.63; P < .001), whereas beta 3-adrenoceptor agonists did not (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.38, 4.14; P = .708). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that antimuscarinic agents statistically significantly increased the incidences of urinary tract infection and lower urinary tract symptoms and dysfunction, but beta 3-adrenoceptor agonists did not. To prevent urinary tract infection emergence, beta 3-adrenoceptor agonists might be safer than antimuscarinic agents.

The Correlation of Diabetes Mellitus and Urinary Retention From Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection for Overactive Bladder.

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT) injection for overactive bladder (OAB) had increased urinary retention requiring clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), as well as the impact of disease duration and severity. We hypothesize that patients with DM will have higher rates of retention after BoNT injection. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of women in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Health System who underwent BoNT injection for OAB, excluding women with a history of urinary retention or neurogenic bladder. RESULTS: We identified 565 patients, 410 in the control group and 155 in the DM group. No significant difference was found in the rate of CIC (9% in the control group versus 5.8% in the DM group, P = 0.2), voiding dysfunction, and peak postprocedure postvoid residual volume (PVR). Patients with diabetes had a significantly increased rate of postprocedure urinary tract infection (UTI; 27.6% versus 38.1%, P = 0.02). Urinary tract infection was significantly associated with urinary retention (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-4.99; P = 0.045) and peak PVR ≥200 mL (adjusted OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.15-5.06; P = 0.019). Diabetic disease duration and severity were not a predictor of urinary retention, elevated PVR, or voiding dysfunction; however, the presence of ≥1 disease-related complication was a predictor of UTI (adjusted OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.34-5.91; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients had a similar rate of urinary retention requiring CIC after BoNT injection for OAB compared with nondiabetic patients. Diabetic patients had an increased risk of UTI based on disease severity.

Transdermal scopolamine and urinary retention following urogynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Both urogynecologic surgeries and transdermal scopolamine (TDS) patches are independently associated with postoperative urinary retention (POUR). It is unclear if the risk of POUR increases when these interventions are used in combination. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to synthesize current evidence to optimize clinical management and outcomes for patients undergoing urogynecologic procedures. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in concordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched. Publications were filtered by inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required: (1) preoperative or perioperative application of TDS, (2) surgery indicated for stress urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse, (3) results given for postoperative voiding trials, and (4) were available in English. Exclusion criteria included: (1) oral or parenteral formulations of scopolamine, (2) administration of alternative preoperative antiemetics, and (3) use of combination antiemetic therapy. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist. Publication bias was evaluated via the ROBINS-I assessment tool, and Egger regression and Begg and Mazumumdar rank correlation tests. A meta-analysis was conducted using Meta-Essentials Excel Workbook. RESULTS: Four publications were identified which complied with inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies comprised 752 patients (237 experimental group, 515 control group). All were retrospective cohort studies conducted via chart review in America. Meta-analysis revealed a risk ratio (RR) of 2.35 with a confidence interval (CI) of 0.61 to 9.07, indicating a positive association between TDS and POUR, but without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that TDS application may be associated with increased risk of POUR following urogynecologic procedures. While research on this topic is greatly limited, this systematic review and meta-analysis highlights that alternative antiemetic therapy may be necessary for patients undergoing such interventions in effort to limit the risk of POUR.

The effect of preoperative scopolamine patch use on postoperative urinary retention in urogynecologic surgeries.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aims to determine whether the use of preoperative transdermal scopolamine is associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention in urogynecologic surgeries. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review study of women who underwent surgery between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. Patients who received a scopolamine patch versus those who did not were compared using demographic and perioperative variables utilizing Pearson's chi-squared test and t-test of Wilcoxon rank-sum. A logistic regression was performed to evaluate the effect of scopolamine on the patients' postoperative voiding trial results, controlling for confounders. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 449 women underwent a vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy, midurethral sling placement, uterosacral or sacrospinous ligament suspension, sacrocolpopexy, anterior/posterior colporrhaphy, or other urogynecologic surgeries with 109 (24.2%) having received transdermal scopolamine. A significantly higher number of women with preoperative scopolamine [n = 50 (45.9%)] failed their voiding trial compared to those without scopolamine [n = 100 (29.4%), p = 0.0016]. The adjusted model yielded an odds ratio of 1.75 (95% CI: 1.08-2.85) of a failed voiding trial in the scopolamine group. When comparing the odds of failing voiding trial by surgery type, those with a midurethral sling placed during surgery had an adjusted odds ratio of 3.12 (95% CI: 2.01-4.87), as compared to those without a midurethral sling. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a transdermal scopolamine patch for nausea and vomiting prophylaxis is associated with increased risk of postoperative urinary retention across all urogynecologic surgeries.

A Retrospective Study of Anticholinergic Use and Later Mobilization as Risk Factors for Urinary Retention After Major Lower Extremity Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common surgical complication of major joint arthroplasty and is associated with increased lengths of stay and urinary tract infections. Studies have found that certain anticholinergic medications and reduced mobility are associated with POUR. This study assessed the effect of anticholinergic burden and later postoperative ambulation on POUR. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included subjects who had undergone elective primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty (total hip arthroplasty [THA] or total knee arthroplasty [TKA]) between March 2015 and December 2017 in a single health system. Anticholinergic burden was measured using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). We performed bivariate and multivariable logistic regression with POUR as the dependent variable. Of the 1,397 study subjects, 622 (45%) underwent THA and 775 (55%) underwent TKA. Their mean age was 65 years (range, 21 to 98), and 841 (60%) were women. POUR developed in 183 (13%) subjects. RESULTS: In multivariable analyses, ADS was associated with POUR after THA (P < .05), but not TKA (P = .08), while later ambulation was not associated with POUR after either procedure (P > .3 for both). CONCLUSION: Anticholinergic burden after THA was independently associated with POUR. Strategies to reduce anticholinergic burden may help reduce POUR after THA.

Are we underestimating urinary retention following intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA in women with overactive bladder and a history of prior pelvic surgery?

AIMS: This study's purpose is to review the rates of urinary retention requiring intermittent catheterization (IC) post intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTN/A) injection for idiopathic overactive bladder from a single practicing specialist urological surgeon. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a single Australian urologist to identify the rate of intermittent catheterization in our clinical setting. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between requirement of IC and risk factors for urinary retention. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and the average age was 69.7 years (SD 17.2) and all participants were female. Thirty-six percent (n = 34) of patients required IC. Of patients requiring IC, 32% had a prior urethral sling, 35% had prior vaginal prolapse surgery, and 29% had a preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI). There was strong evidence of univariate associations between IC and prior sling (odds ratio [OR]: 5.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-16.55, p = 0.005), preoperative UTI (OR: 4.25, 95% CI: 1.31-13.08, p = 0.016) and prior vaginal prolapse surgery (OR: 4.91, 95% CI: 1.64-14.72, p = 0.005). Evidence that prior sling patients were more likely to require IC remained strong in a multivariable model (OR: 7.35, 95% CI: 1.59-34.11, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Prior urethral sling surgery, prior vaginal prolapse surgery, and positive preoperative UTI, despite treatment, were found to be associated with a higher rate of initiation of intermittent catheterization. The rate of IC initiation of 36% was higher than reported in prior clinical trials.

A peripheral opioid antagonist for treating urinary retention induced by opioids: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Urinary retention is a poorly studied opioid-related adverse effect. There is a paucity of data regarding the treatment of such disturbance in patients with advanced cancer receiving opioids. ACTUAL CASE: A young man, without comorbidities, was receiving 30 mg/day of oxycodone for abdominal pain due to pancreatic cancer, unsuccessfully. He also complained of severe urinary retention that developed after initiation of opioid therapy. Methadone therapy was effective on pain intensity, but bladder dysfunction persisted. POSSIBLE COURSES OF ACTION: Only anedoctal experience exists for opioid-induced urinary retention. The options included alpha-receptor blockers and flavoxate, which are symptomatic drugs, not addressed to the possible mechanism. FORMULATION OF A PLAN: The use of a peripheral opioid antagonist was planned, according to the presumed mechanism of urinary retention. Thus, naldemedine 200 mcg was prescribed for relieving urinary retention. OUTCOME: The day after starting naldemedine, urinary retention completely reversed and pain was well-controlled. LESSONS: The rational of using naldemedine was based on the component of opioid-induced urinary retention due to involvement of peripheral receptors in the bladder and sphincter. VIEW: In this case report, the effect of the peripheral opioid antagonist was prompt and long-lasting. Future studies of this neglected adverse effect of opioids should be performed to confirm this observation.