Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Triple Therapy With Telaprevir and Boceprevir for Chronic Hepatitis C: A Decision Analysis From the Brazilian Public Health System Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Because of the lack of evidence regarding long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of first-generation direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment in Brazil, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing standard dual therapy (peginterferon plus ribavirin [pegIFN/RBV]), boceprevir, and telaprevir for CHC patients. METHODS: We developed a state-transition Markov model simulating the progression of CHC. Long-term outcomes included remaining life expectancy in life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Short-term outcomes included sustained virological response rates (SVR). Direct medical costs were obtained from Brazilian databases. A lifelong time horizon was considered and a 5% annual discount rate was applied for costs and clinical outcomes. A willingness-to-pay threshold of approximately $20 000 per QALY was used. We performed multiple sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: For short- and long-term scenarios, therapy with boceprevir was dominated by telaprevir, which was more effective than standard dual therapy (75.0% vs 40.4% SVR rate, 13.47 vs 12.59 LYs, and 9.74 vs 8.49 QALYs, respectively) and was also more expensive ($15 742 vs $5413). The corresponding ICERs were $29 854/SVR, $11 803/LY, and $8277/QALY. Based on our model, triple therapy with telaprevir was the most cost-effective treatment for the Brazilian health system. Despite a lack of data regarding the Brazilian population, we incorporated as many applicable parameters as possible. CONCLUSIONS: Telaprevir is more effective and cost-effective than boceprevir. Our model may be applied for other settings with a few adjustments in the input parameters.

Micro-costing analysis of guideline-based treatment by direct-acting agents: the real-life case of hepatitis C management in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) using direct-acting agents (DAA) has been associated with a financial burden to health authorities worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the guideline-based treatment costs by DAAs from the perspective of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMoH). METHODS: The activity based costing method was used to estimate the cost for monitoring/treatment of genotype-1 (GT1) HCV patients by the following strategies: peg-interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks, PEG-IFN/RBV plus boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TEL) for 48 weeks, and sofosbuvir (SOF) plus daclastavir (DCV) or simeprevir (SIM) for 12 weeks. Costs were reported in United States Dollars without (US$) and with adjustment for purchasing power parity (PPP$). Drug costs were collected at the National Database of Health Prices and an overview of the literature was performed to assess effectiveness of SOF/DCV and SOF/SIM regimens in real-world cohorts. RESULTS: Treatment costs of GT1-HCV patients were PPP$ 43,176.28 (US$ 24,020.16) for PEG-IFN/RBV, PPP$ 71,196.03 (US$ 39,578.23) for PEG-IFN/RBV/BOC and PPP$ 86,250.33 (US$ 47,946.92) for PEG-IFN/RBV/TEL. Treatment by all-oral interferon-free regimens were the less expensive approach: PPP$ 19,761.72 (US$ 10,985.90) for SOF/DCV and PPP$ 21,590.91 (US$ 12,002.75) for SOF/SIM. The overview reported HCV eradication in up to 98% for SOF/DCV and 96% for SOF/SIM. CONCLUSION: Strategies with all oral interferon-free might lead to lower costs for management of GT1-HCV patients compared to IFN-based regimens in Brazil. This occurred mainly because of high discounts over international DAA prices due to negotiation between BMoH and pharmaceutical industries.

Custo-efetividade da inclusão dos respondedores virológicos lentos no tratamento da hepatite C na presença da coinfecção com o HIV / Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment in slow virologic responders coinfected with HIV / Coste-efectividad del tratamiento de la hepatitis C en coinfectados con el VIH con respuesta virológica lenta

Evidências recentes demonstram que respondedores virológicos lentos podem se beneficiar com a extensão do tratamento antiviral. O estudo investigou a adoção desse protocolo diante da coinfecção VHC/HIV. O objetivo foi estudar a relação de custo/efetividade da terapêutica com peguinterferon associado à ribavirina em portadores do genótipo 1 do VHC coinfectados com o HIV, comparando-se a inclusão ou não de respondedores virológicos lentos. Simulou-se por meio de um modelo de Markov a progressão da doença hepática em uma coorte hipotética de mil homens, maiores de 40 anos, considerandose a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e horizonte temporal de 30 anos. A extensão do tratamento para respondedores lentos resultou em uma razão incremental de custo efetividade de R$ 44.171/QALY, valor abaixo do limiar de aceitabilidade proposto pela Organização Mundial da Saúde. A análise de sensibilidade não modificou os resultados alcançados. A inclusão de indivíduos coinfectados VHC/HIV respondedores virológicos lentos no protocolo de tratamento apresenta-se como uma estratégia custo-efetiva para o SUS.

Recent evidence has demonstrated that slow responders may benefit from antiviral treatment in HCV/HIV coinfection. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment in individuals with genotype 1 coinfected with HIV, with peg-interferon in combination with ribavirin, compared to the inclusion (versus non-inclusion) of slow responders. A Markov model was developed that simulated the progression of liver disease in a hypothetical cohort of one thousand men over 40 years of age, considering the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) perspective and a 30-year timeline. The extension of treatment to slow responders provided a 60% increase in the number of individuals who eliminated HCV and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 44,171 BRL/QALY, below the acceptability threshold proposed by World Health Organization. Sensitivity analysis did not alter the results. The inclusion of HCV/ HIV-coinfected slow virologic responders in the treatment protocol is shown to be a cost-effective strategy for the SUS.

La evidencia reciente ha demostrado que los individuos con respuesta virológica lenta pueden beneficiarse de una extensión del tratamiento antiviral. El estudio investigó la adopción de este protocolo antes de la coinfección por VHC/HIV. El objetivo fue estudiar la relación coste-efectividad de la terapia con peginterferon asociado con ribavirina en pacientes con genotipo 1 del VHC, coinfectados por el HIV respondedores virológicos lentos. Se simula mediante un modelo de Markov la progresión de la enfermedad hepática en una cohorte hipotética de un millar de hombres, más de 40, teniendo en cuenta la perspectiva del Sistema Único de Salud (SUS) y un horizonte temporal de 30 años. El grado de tratamiento a los respondedores lentos dio lugar a un incremento de coste-efectividad de R$ 44.171/QALY, por debajo del umbral de aceptabilidad propuesto por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. El análisis de sensibilidad no modificó los resultados. La inclusión de los individuos coinfectados y con respuesta virológica lenta en el protocolo de tratamiento se presenta como una estrategia económica para el SUS.

[Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment in slow virologic responders coinfected with HIV]. / Custo-efetividade da inclusão dos respondedores virológicos lentos no tratamento da hepatite C na presença da coinfecção com o HIV.

Recent evidence has demonstrated that slow responders may benefit from antiviral treatment in HCV/HIV coinfection. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment in individuals with genotype 1 coinfected with HIV, with peg-interferon in combination with ribavirin, compared to the inclusion (versus non-inclusion) of slow responders. A Markov model was developed that simulated the progression of liver disease in a hypothetical cohort of one thousand men over 40 years of age, considering the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) perspective and a 30-year timeline. The extension of treatment to slow responders provided a 60% increase in the number of individuals who eliminated HCV and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 44,171 BRL/QALY, below the acceptability threshold proposed by World Health Organization. Sensitivity analysis did not alter the results. The inclusion of HCV/ HIV-coinfected slow virologic responders in the treatment protocol is shown to be a cost-effective strategy for the SUS.

Early interferon-based treatment after detection of persistent hepatitis C virus infection: a critical decision.

Approximately 170 million people are infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) worldwide. Infection with this pathogen is persistent in more than 80% of cases, frequently developing severe forms of liver damage such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. No preventive vaccine is available against HCV, and current treatment based on the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin is effective in ∼55% of patients infected with genotype 1, the most prevalent genotype. This review analyzes several factors influencing the achievement of a sustained virological response, namely undetectable HCV RNA at 6 months after conclusion of therapy. Particularly, the relevant issue of age and duration of infection is discussed in detail. Indeed, the final decision for starting treatment should be a case-by-case point. However, the cost-benefit analysis seems to indicate that in patients who are motivated and without contraindications, starting the treatment as early as possible is probably the best choice for success.

Cost effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2B combined with ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Brazil

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with peginterferon alpha-2b/ribavirin (PegIFN + Rib) produced larger sustained viral response (SVR) compared to the conventional (non-pegylated) interferon/ribavirin (IFN + Rib), but its cost-effectiveness was not assessed in Brazil. We developed a Markov model to mirror the natural disease history and cohorts of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), that received PegIFN + Rib or IFN + Rib treatment for 48 or 24 weeks, according to viral genotype and liver histology. The SVRs for the treatments PegIFN + Rib and IFN + Rib were respectively 48 percent and 34 percent (genotype 1), and 88 percent and 80 percent (genotype non-1). Three Delphi panels were conducted with hepatologists and intensivists, and another one with oncologists. The costs are expressed in 2006 Brazilian Reais (R$) and the benefits were discounted at 3 percent. In genotype 1 HCV patients, PegIFN + Rib increases the life expectancy (LE) in 0.51 year, and the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) in 0.78, as compared to IFN + Rib. In genotype non-1 HCV patients, PegIFN + Rib increases the LE in 0.29 years and the QALY in 0.44 years, as compared to IFN + Rib. The incremental cost-effectiveness rate, considering all the genotypes, was of R$19,848.34 per QALY. Peginterferon alpha-2b with ribavirin is a cost-effective therapy for the treatment of naïve CHC adult patients compared to the interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin regime, irrespective of the viral genotype.

Cost effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2B combined with ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Brazil.

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with peginterferon alpha-2b/ribavirin (PegIFN + Rib) produced larger sustained viral response (SVR) compared to the conventional (non-pegylated) interferon/ribavirin (IFN + Rib), but its cost-effectiveness was not assessed in Brazil. We developed a Markov model to mirror the natural disease history and cohorts of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), that received PegIFN + Rib or IFN + Rib treatment for 48 or 24 weeks, according to viral genotype and liver histology. The SVRs for the treatments PegIFN + Rib and IFN + Rib were respectively 48% and 34% (genotype 1), and 88% and 80% (genotype non-1). Three Delphi panels were conducted with hepatologists and intensivists, and another one with oncologists. The costs are expressed in 2006 Brazilian Reais (R$) and the benefits were discounted at 3%. In genotype 1 HCV patients, PegIFN + Rib increases the life expectancy (LE) in 0.51 year, and the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) in 0.78, as compared to IFN + Rib. In genotype non-1 HCV patients, PegIFN + Rib increases the LE in 0.29 years and the QALY in 0.44 years, as compared to IFN + Rib. The incremental cost-effectiveness rate, considering all the genotypes, was of R$19,848.34 per QALY. Peginterferon alpha-2b with ribavirin is a cost-effective therapy for the treatment of naïve CHC adult patients compared to the interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin regime, irrespective of the viral genotype.

Cost-effectiveness of chronic hepatitis C treatment with thymosin alpha-1.

BACKGROUND: More than one million individuals in Mexico are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), and 80% are at risk for developing a chronic infection that could lead to hepatic cirrhosis and other complications that impact quality of life and institutional costs. The objective of the study was to determine the most cost-effective treatment against HCV among the following: peginterferon, peginterferon plus ribavirin, peginterferon plus ribavirin plus thymosin, and no treatment. METHODS: We carried out cost-effectiveness analysis using the institutional perspective, including a 45-year time frame and a 3% discount rate for costs and effectiveness. We employed a Bayesian-focused decision tree and a Markov model. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed, as well as threshold-oriented and probabilistic analyses, and we obtained acceptability curves and net health benefits. RESULTS: Triple therapy (peginterferon plus ribavirin plus thymosin alpha-1) was dominant with lower cost and higher utility in relationship with peginterferon + ribavirin option, peginterferon alone and no-treatment option. In triple therapy the cost per unit of success was of 1,908 [USD/quality-adjusted life years (QALY)] compared with peginterferon plus ribavirin 2,277/QALY, peginterferon alone 2,929/QALY, and no treatment 4,204/QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case. CONCLUSIONS: Peginterferon plus ribavirin plus thymosin alpha-1 option was dominant (lowest cost and highest effectiveness). Using no drug was the most expensive and least effective option.

Pharmacoeconomics applied to chronic hepatitis C.

Life expectancy has increased over the last century as it had never been before. This is the result of a combination of many favorable variables such as level of education, improved socio-economic environment and development of medicine. However, new improvements demand heavy investment. Thus, the incorporation of medical technology became a health and economic issue. The pharmacoeconomic knowledge field is being developed to help in the analysis of medical costs and patient needs. The applies to hepatitic C, a common and chronic worldwide disease. In this article, the authors describe the rational behind this type of health economic analysis and review a hepatitis C model. Overall, in a non-Brazilian scenario, it was demonstrated that peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) is cost effective in the treatment of HCV disease.

Pharmacoeconomics applied to chronic hepatitis C

Life expectancy has increased over the last century as it had never been before. This is the result of a combination of many favorable variables such as level of education, improved socio-economic environment and development of medicine. However, new improvements demand heavy investment. Thus, the incorporation of medical technology became a health and economic issue. The pharmacoeconomic knowledge field is being developed to help in the analysis of medical costs and patient needs. The applies to hepatitic C, a common and chronic worldwide disease. In this article, the authors describe the rational behind this type of health economic analysis and review a hepatitis C model. Overall, in a non-Brazilian scenario, it was demonstrated that peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) is cost effective in the treatment of HCV disease.