Physiotherapy interventions in post- and long-COVID-19: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Post- or long-COVID-19 conditions manifest with a spectrum of symptoms reminiscent of pulmonary, musculoskeletal, psychological and neurological disorders. Individuals with post- or long-COVID-19 syndrome often present with myalgia, pulmonary problems and fatigue, which significantly impact their daily functioning. Physiotherapy interventions are an accepted medical remedy for these symptoms. This scoping review aims to outline the evidence of physiotherapy interventions documented in the scientific literature, specifically focusing on hands-on therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review conforms to the methodological framework established by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The procedure for drafting a scoping review involves several steps, starting with defining the research question and the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible studies are those analysing physiotherapy treatment parameters for direct patient interaction in post- and long-COVID-19 patients. Telemedicine and entirely home-based workouts will be excluded aligning with the context of outpatient physiotherapy in Germany. The literature search will be conducted in PubMed, EBSCO research, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, PEDRO, Cochrane and WISO databases by two independent researchers. Screening, data extraction and a critical appraisal will be performed by these researchers using assessment tools provided by the JBI. Extracted data will encompass demographic characteristics, definitions of post- or long-COVID-19 conditions, descriptions of interventions, their treatment parameters and treatment outcome. Subsequently, findings will be disseminated through a scoping review article or conference presentation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Given that this review does not involve human participants, ethical committee approval is deemed unnecessary. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic and physiotherapeutic conferences.

Researchers See Hope in Symptom-Guided Exercise for Long COVID With Postexertional Malaise.

This Medical News story discusses a clinical trial that tested symptom-guided exercise for patients with long COVID and postexertional malaise.

Etapa subaguda de pos-COVID-19 grave o crítico. Rehabilitación musculoesquelética, respiratoria y uso de corticoides. Experiencia de la Unidad de Rehabilitación del Hospital del Banco de Seguros del Estado (URHBSE) / Subacute stage of severe or critical post-COVID-19. Musculoskeletal and respiratory rehabilitation, and use of corticosteroids. Experience of the rehabilitation Unit of the Banco de Seguros del Estado Hospital (URHBSE) / Estadio subagudo de pós-COVID-19 grave ou crítico. Reabilitação musculoesquelética e respiratória e uso de corticosteroides. Experiência da Unidade de Reabilitação do Hospital do Banco de Seguros do Estado (URHBSE)

Introducción: en los pacientes que cursaron COVID-19 grave o crítico se ha descripto el uso de prednisona y rehabilitación musculoesquelética y respiratoria. No está claramente establecido el rol de estas intervenciones, ni el momento óptimo para su inicio. En este trabajo se muestran los resultados de la Unidad de Rehabilitación del Hospital del Banco de Seguros del Estado (URHBSE) que implementó un programa de rehabilitación integral y uso de corticoides en la etapa subaguda de pacientes pos-COVID-19 grave o crítico, con un enfoque sistematizado, trabajando desde la interdisciplina y centrado en la persona atendida. Se reportan hallazgos al ingreso, requerimiento de oxígeno, escala de Barthel, patrones tomográficos, uso de corticoides, su respuesta y complicaciones. Se describen los resultados de este enfoque sobre variables clínicas, respiratorias y funcionales. Material y método: estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, de pacientes pos-COVID-19 que completaron la rehabilitación en la URHBSE, en el período comprendido entre abril y agosto de 2021. Datos obtenidos de revisión de historias clínicas. Análisis estadístico con PRISM (v8.2.1). Resultados: completaron el programa de rehabilitación 84 pacientes. Al ingreso a la URHBSE, 55% tenía dependencia total o grave en la escala de Barthel. No lograba marcha el 48%. Requería oxígeno el 89,2% de los pacientes con una media de saturación de 90,3 ± 4,8. El 25% ingresó requiriendo máscara con reservorio. Todos los pacientes que comenzaron el programa se encontraban en fase subaguda de la enfermedad (4 a 12 semanas), y recibieron un plan de rehabilitación integral e individualizado. El objetivo era alcanzar una situación funcional similar a la que presentaban previo al COVID-19. La duración de la internación en la URHBSE fue de 23,5 ± 13,8 días. A 76 pacientes (90,5%) se les realizó tomografía de alta resolución de tórax (TACAR), resultando patológica en 96,1%. Predominaba el vidrio deslustrado (49,3%), la consolidación en 8,23% y un patrón de tipo fibrosis like en 30,13%. Se detectaron alteraciones tomográficas "no típicas" de daño pos-COVID (derrame pleural, nódulos cavitados, cavidades apicales, etc.) en 11,8% de las tomografías. En dos pacientes (2,6%) se halló una aspergilosis pulmonar y en 6,6% tromboembolismo pulmonar. Recibieron prednisona 44 pacientes (52,3%). En 63,4% se suspendió el aporte de oxígeno en los primeros 15 días desde el inicio de prednisona. Encontramos asociación entre el patrón tomográfico con vidrio deslustrado y la suspensión precoz del aporte de oxígeno desde el inicio de prednisona (p = 0,047). A pesar del alto grado de colonización, incluso en aquellos casos en que utilizamos prednisona, no observamos infecciones por microorganismos colonizantes. Comparando ingreso y egreso se hallaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en los siguientes parámetros: el grado de disnea, el requerimiento de oxígeno (un solo paciente fue dado de alta con oxígeno), la saturación, el grado de instrumentación (traqueostomía, sonda nasogástrica, etc.), y la escala de dependencia de Barthel. En cuanto a las variables respiratorias solo contamos con el dato de la presencia de disnea de los primeros 35 pacientes, de éstos, 83% presentaba disnea al ingreso, mientras que solo 17% la presentaba al egreso (p < 0,0001). Hubo, asimismo, diferencias significativas en el requerimiento de oxígeno entre el ingreso y el egreso (p < 0,0001) y en el grado de dependencia medido en la escala de Barthel, teniendo dependencia total o grave al ingreso 55% de los pacientes y solo 3,4% al alta. Conclusiones: las intervenciones realizadas en la etapa subaguda de la enfermedad se asociaron con mejoras significativas en variables de interés clínico. Faltan más estudios para definir el rol y el momento exacto del inicio de los corticoides y la rehabilitación en este grupo de pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: In patients with severe or critical COVID-19, the use of prednisone and musculoskeletal and respiratory rehabilitation has been described. The role of these interventions and the optimal time for their initiation are not clearly established. This study presents the results of the Rehabilitation Unit of the Banco de Seguro del Estado Hospital, which implemented a comprehensive rehabilitation program and the use of corticosteroids in the subacute stage of patients with severe or critical post-COVID-19, with a systematic approach, working interdisciplinary and centered on the person being treated. Findings at admission, oxygen requirement, Barthel scale, tomographic patterns, use of corticosteroids, their response, and complications are reported. The results of this approach on clinical, respiratory, and functional variables are described. Method: Descriptive, retrospective study of post-COVID-19 patients who completed rehabilitation at the Rehabilitation Unit of the Banco de Seguros del Estado Hospital (URHBSE) in the period April-August 2021. Data obtained from review of medical records, statistical analysis with PRISM (v8.2.1). Results: Eighty-four patients completed the rehabilitation program. Upon admission to the URHBSE, 55% had total or severe dependence on the Barthel scale. Forty-eight percent were unable to walk. Eighty-nine-point two percent required oxygen, with a mean saturation of 90.3 ± 4.8. Twenty-five percent of patients were admitted requiring a reservoir mask. All patients who entered the program were in the subacute phase of the disease (4 to 12 weeks) and received a comprehensive and individualized rehabilitation plan. The objective was to achieve a functional situation similar to what they had before COVID-19. The length of stay at the URHBSE was 23.5 ± 13.8 days. A total of 76 patients (90.5%) underwent high-resolution chest tomography (HRCT), which was pathological in 96.1% of cases. The predominant findings were ground-glass opacity in 49.3% of cases, consolidation in 8.23%, and a fibrosis-like pattern in 30.13%. "Non-typical" post-COVID damage tomographic alterations were detected (pleural effusion, cavitary nodules, apical cavities, etc.) in 11.8% of the tomographies. In 2 patients (2.6%), pulmonary aspergillosis was found, and in 6.6%, pulmonary thromboembolism. Forty-four patients (52.3%) received prednisone. In 63.4% of cases, oxygen supplementation was discontinued within the first 15 days from the start of prednisone. We found an association between the ground-glass opacity tomographic pattern and early discontinuation of oxygen supplementation from the start of prednisone (p = 0.047). Despite the high degree of colonization, we did not observe infections by colonizing microorganisms, even in those who used prednisone. Comparing admission and discharge, statistically significant differences were found in the following parameters: degree of dyspnea, oxygen requirement (only one patient was discharged with oxygen), saturation, degree of instrumentation (tracheostomy, nasogastric tube, etc.), and the Barthel dependency scale. Regarding respiratory variables, we only have data on the presence of dyspnea in the first 35 patients. Of these, 83% had dyspnea at admission, while only 17% had it at discharge (p < 0.0001). There were also significant differences in the oxygen requirement between admission and discharge (p < 0.0001) and in the degree of dependency measured on the Barthel scale. Fifty-five percent of patients had total or severe dependence at admission, compared to only 3.4% at discharge. Conclusions: The interventions carried out in the subacute stage of the disease were associated with significant improvements in clinical variables of interest. More studies are needed to define the role and the exact timing of the initiation of corticosteroids and rehabilitation in this group of patients.

Introdução: O uso de prednisona e reabilitação musculoesquelética e respiratória foi descrito no tratamento de pacientes com COVID-19 grave ou crítico. O papel destas intervenções e o momento ideal para o seu início não estão claramente estabelecidos. Este trabalho mostra os resultados da Unidade de Reabilitação Hospitalar do Banco de Seguro del Estado que implementou um programa abrangente de reabilitação e uso de corticosteroides na fase subaguda de pacientes graves ou críticos pós-COVID-19, com uma abordagem sistematizada, trabalhando de forma interdisciplinar e centrada no paciente. São relatados os achados na admissão, a necessidade de oxigênio, a escala de Barthel, os padrões tomográficos, o uso de corticosteroides, a resposta ao tratamento e as complicações. Os resultados desta abordagem sobre variáveis clínicas, respiratórias e funcionais são descritos. Material e métodos: Estudo descritivo e retrospectivo de pacientes pós-COVID-19 que completaram reabilitação na Unidade de Reabilitação do Hospital Banco de Seguros del Estado (URHBSE) no período de abril a agosto de 2021. Os dados foram obtidos dos prontuários de pacientes com posterior análise estatísticas usando PRISM (v8.2.1). Resultados: 84 pacientes completaram o programa de reabilitação. No momento da admissão na URHBSE, 55% apresentavam dependência total ou grave da escala de Barthel. 48% não conseguiam se mover. 89,2% necessitaram oxigênio com saturação média de 90,3 ± 4,8. 25% dos pacientes foram internados necessitando máscara com reservatório. Todos os pacientes que ingressaram no programa estavam na fase subaguda da doença (4 a 12 semanas) e receberam um plano de reabilitação abrangente e individualizado. O objetivo era alcançar uma situação funcional semelhante à que apresentavam antes da COVID-19. O tempo de permanência na URHBSE foi de 23,5±13,8 dias. A tomografia de tórax de alta resolução (TCAR) foi realizada em 76 pacientes (90,5%); os resultados foram patológicos em 96,1%. O vidro fosco predominou em 49,3% deles, a consolidação em 8,23% e o padrão fibroso em 30,13%. Alterações tomográficas "atípicas" de danos pós-COVID (derrame pleural, nódulos cavitados, cavidades apicais, etc.) foram detectadas em 11,8% dos exames tomográficos. Aspergilose pulmonar foi encontrada em 2,6% dos pacientes e tromboembolismo pulmonar em 6,6%. 44 pacientes (52,3%) receberam prednisona. Em 63,4% a oferta de oxigênio foi suspensa nos primeiros 15 dias após o início da mesma. Encontramos associação entre o padrão tomográfico em vidro fosco e a suspensão precoce da oferta de oxigênio desde o início da administração da prednisona (p = 0,047). Apesar do alto grau de colonização, mesmo naqueles que usaram prednisona, não observamos infecções. Em relação às variáveis respiratórias, só temos dados sobre a presença de dispneia nos primeiros 35 pacientes; destes, 83% apresentavam dispneia na admissão, enquanto apenas 17% a apresentavam na alta (p< 0,0001). Observou-se também diferenças significativas na necessidade de O2 entre a admissão e a alta (p< 0,0001) e no grau de dependência medido pela escala de Barthel, com 55% dos pacientes apresentando dependência total ou grave na admissão e apenas 3,4% na alta. Conclusões: As intervenções realizadas na fase subaguda da doença foram associadas a melhorias significativas nas variáveis de interesse clínico. São necessários mais estudos para definir o papel e o momento exato do início dos corticosteroides e da reabilitação neste grupo de pacientes.

Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions on Adults With COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Condition. A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for adults with COVID-19 and post COVID-19 condition (PCC) in all settings. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched from inception to December 31st, 2021. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021258553. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI) according to the University of Alberta Evidence-based Practice Center. DATA EXTRACTION: One author extracted data using a predetermined Excel form. DATA SYNTHESIS: The meta-analysis indicates uncertain evidence about the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation and self-activities on exercise capacity (MD 65.06, 95% CI 42.87 to 87.25), respiratory function (forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1]: MD 0.16, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.28; FEV1/forced vital capacity [FVC]: MD 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09; FVC: MD 0.19, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.42) and anxiety (MD -12.03, 95% CI -21.16 to -2.90) in mild COVID-19 and PCC patients. According to the narrative synthesis, including RCTs and NRSI, prone positioning seems to show improvements in vital parameters in severe COVID-19 post intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, pulmonary rehabilitation in activities of daily living, and qigong exercise and acupressure rehabilitation program, and "twist and raise" walking technique in reducing dyspnea and weakness in any degree of severity of COVID-19 and PCC. Functional electrical stimulation-cycling or early rehabilitation programs seem to support a faster recovery in patients with moderate COVID-19 after ICU discharge. Yoga and naturopathy, Mandala coloring, and respiratory exercise seem to reduce anxiety and depression in patients with moderate and mild COVID-19. Cognitive motor training seems to improve cognitive function in PCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is very uncertain evidence about the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on exercise capacity and respiratory function in patients with mild COVID-19 and PCC. Further high-quality research is required to improve the certainty of evidence available to support rehabilitation's crucial role in managing COVID-19.

[Assessment of Long COVID in Medical Rehabilitation]. / Bestandsaufnahme zu Long COVID in der medizinischen Rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to provide an insight into the care situation of long COVID patients in inpatient medical rehabilitation facilities in Germany. METHODS: For this purpose, a standardized online survey was conducted among 1,080 inpatient medical rehabilitation facilities in Germany. RESULTS: A total of 338 cases were available for the analysis. Of these, 173 (51%) reported treating long COVID. The cumulative total number of rehabilitants with long COVID treated in the facilities up to the time of the survey was 11,948. The results showed that rehabilitation facilities were mostly prepared for the care of patients with Long COVID. Lack of capacity was reported especially by those rehabilitation facilities that treated rehabilitants with long COVID in pneumology departments. Furthermore, capacity bottlenecks were related to the total number of patients with long COVID in the rehabilitation facility ("proportion of rehabilitants with long COVID to all rehabilitants in the department"). Heterogeneity was found in the treatment concept for long COVID and the allocation of patients to a specific department. CONCLUSION: The results of the long COVID inventory underline the importance of medical rehabilitation in the treatment of the long-term health and participation-related consequences of COVID-19.

[Rehabilitation for Post-COVID Syndrome covered by the German Pension Insurance in 2021]. / Rehabilitationen bei Post-COVID-Syndrom der Deutschen Rentenversicherung 2021.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The present work is intended to give an overview of rehabilitation of patients with post COVID-19 condition covered by the German Pension Insurance in 2021. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of medical rehabilitation completed in 2021, in which COVID-19 sequelae were coded in first or second place in the uniform discharge report according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems was carried out. The codes U08(.9), U09(.9) and U10(.9) as well as the corresponding codes from 2020 were taken into the evaluation as COVID-19-related diseases. Children's rehabilitation and oncological rehabilitation for pensioners and their relatives were excluded. Statistically, relative and absolute frequencies are given for nominal and ordinal variables, and median and quartiles for continuous, skewed distributed variables. RESULTS: 9,666 rehabilitations with one of the codes mentioned in first or second place remained. 54.8% of the patients were women and 43.2% men. The median age was 54 and 55 years (women/men). In all, 64.4% of the rehabilitations were carried out in the pulmonary medicine department. Owing to somatic indications, almost 50% of these patients in rehabilitation remained in the clinic beyond the regular approval period. The most common other diagnoses were diseases of the respiratory system. In 80.7% of those affected, the treating physicians considered the post-COVID-19 condition-associated symptoms as improved through rehabilitation. Furthermore, employment was subject to social security contributions for 88.0% of these patients, and 30.5% were employed in the fields of health, social affairs, teaching, and education. Of those affected, 63.8% were on sick leave when they were admitted, 63.0% when they were discharged. With regard to performance in the last job or on the general job market, over 90.0% received a prognosis for 6 hours and more. CONCLUSION: The importance of post-COVID-19 condition in the context of medical rehabilitation increased significantly over the course of 2021. The disease causes long periods of disability. With regard to performance, the available analyses give a positive picture; only 6.5% of those individuals undergoing rehabilitation were assessed as having a reduced capacity to earn of less than 3 hours on the general labor market.

Effects of a cardiopulmonary telerehabilitation using functional exercises in individuals after COVID-19 hospital discharge: A randomized controlled trial

Individuals with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may present respiratory and motor complications, requiring rehabilitation programs (RP) for long periods. However, access to cardiopulmonary rehabilitation is poor. Cardiopulmonary telerehabilitation is an alternative for cardiopulmonary dysfunction, improving functional capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life. Moreover, few clinical trials verified the effectiveness of telerehabilitation using functional exercise for post-COVID symptoms. Thus, the present study aimed to verify the effects of cardiopulmonary telerehabilitation using functional and accessible exercises in individuals after COVID-19 hospital discharge. This blinded, randomized, and controlled clinical trial and included 67 adult individuals after COVID-19 hospital discharge. Participants were randomized into the groups of telerehabilitation (TG; n = 33) and control (CG; n = 34). TG underwent an individualized exercise program (functional and accessible exercises) supervised by a physical therapist (videoconference), and CG received guidance on general care and self-monitoring of vital signs (videoconference). The primary outcome was performance and physiological responses on the 6-minute step test (6MST). Secondary outcomes were performance on the 2-minute stationary walk test (2MSWT), 30-second chair stand test (30CST), and quality of life using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire physical functioning concept (PF). Functional capacity (6MST) improved by 28 ± 17 steps in TG and 15 ± 26 in CG (p = 0.04). For secondary outcomes, performance on 2MSWT increased by 39 ± 6 steps in TG and 10 ± 6 in CG (p = 0.00); 30CST by 3 ± 1 repetitions in TG and 1.5 ± 0.5 in CG (p = 0.05); and PF (SF-36) by 17 ± 4 points in TG and 12 ± 4 in CG (p = 0.00). Also, peak oxygen uptake VO2peak (6MST) improved by 3.8 ± 1 mL min−1 kg−1 in TG and 4.1 ± 1 in CG (p = 0.6), and heart rate demand (6MST) by 11 ± 37% in TG and −4 ± 19% in CG (p = 0.04). Cardiopulmonary telerehabilitation using functional exercises improved the exercise and functional capacity assessed using 6MST, 30CST, and 2MSWT and the quality of life of individuals after COVID-19 hospital discharge.

A safe and effective micro-choice based rehabilitation for patients with long COVID: results from a quasi-experimental study.

At least 65 million people suffer from long COVID. Treatment guidelines are unclear, especially pertaining to recommendations of increased activity. This longitudinal study evaluated safety, changes in functional level and sick leave following a concentrated rehabilitation program for patients with long COVID. Seventy-eight patients (19-67 years) participated in a 3-day micro-choice based rehabilitation program with 7-day and 3-month follow-up. Fatigue, functional levels, sick leave, dyspnea and exercise capacity were assessed. No adverse events were reported and 97.4% completed the rehabilitation. Fatigue measured with Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire decreased at 7-days [mean difference (MD = - 4.5, 95% CI - 5.5 to - 3.4) and 3-month (MD = - 5.5, 95% CI - 6.7 to - 4.3). Sick leave rates and dyspnea were reduced (p < 0.001) and exercise capacity and functional level increased (p < 0.001) at 3-month follow-up regardless of severity of fatigue at baseline. Micro-choice based concentrated rehabilitation for patients with long COVID was safe, highly acceptable and showed rapid improvements in fatigue and functional levels, sustaining over time. Even though this is a quasi-experimental study, the findings are of importance addressing the tremendous challenges of disability due to long COVID. Our results are also highly relevant for patients, as they provide the base for an optimistic outlook and evidence supported reason for hope.

Unraveling pathophysiologic mechanisms contributing to symptoms in patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): A retrospective study.

Patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) present with a decrease in physical fitness. The aim of this paper is to reveal the relations between the remaining symptoms, blood volume distribution, exercise tolerance, static and dynamic lung volumes, and overall functioning. Patients with PASC were retrospectively studied. Pulmonary function tests (PFT), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and cardiopulmonary exercise test were performed. Chest CT was taken and quantified. Patients were divided into two groups: minor functional limitations (MFL) and severe functional limitations (SFL) based on the completed Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale (PCFS). Twenty one patients (3 M; 18 FM), mean age 44 (IQR 21) were studied. Eighteen completed the PCFS (8 MFL; 10 SFL). VO2 max was suboptimal in both groups (not significant). 6MWT was significantly higher in MFL-group (p = 0.043). Subjects with SFL, had significant lower TLC (p = 0.029). The MFL-group had more air trapping (p = 0.036). Throughout the sample, air trapping correlated significantly with residual volume (RV) in L (p < 0.001). An increase in air trapping was related to an increase in BV5 (p < 0.001). Mean BV5 was 65% (IQR 5%). BV5% in patients with PASC was higher than in patients with acute COVID-19 infection. This increase in BV5% in patients with PASC is thought to be driven by the air trapping in the lobes. This study reveals that symptoms are more driven by occlusion of the small airways. Patients with more physical complaints have significantly lower TLC. All subjects encounter physical limitations as indicated by suboptimal VO2 max. Treatment should focus on opening or re-opening of small airways by recruiting alveoli.

Digital Interventions for Treating Post-COVID or Long-COVID Symptoms: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with post-COVID/long-COVID symptoms need support, and health care professionals need to be able to provide evidence-based patient care. Digital interventions can meet these requirements, especially if personal contact is limited. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed evidence-based digital interventions that are currently available to help manage physical and mental health in patients with post-COVID/long-COVID symptoms. METHODS: A scoping review was carried out summarizing novel digital health interventions for treating post-COVID/long-COVID patients. Using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) scheme, original studies were summarized, in which patients with post-COVID/long-COVID symptoms used digital interventions to help aid recovery. RESULTS: From all scanned articles, 8 original studies matched the inclusion criteria. Of the 8 studies, 3 were "pretest" studies, 3 described the implementation of a telerehabilitation program, 1 was a post-COVID/long-COVID program, and 1 described the results of qualitative interviews with patients who used an online peer-support group. Following the PICO scheme, we summarized previous studies. Studies varied in terms of participants (P), ranging from adults in different countries, such as former hospitalized patients with COVID-19, to individuals in disadvantaged communities in the United Kingdom, as well as health care workers. In addition, the studies included patients who had previously been infected with COVID-19 and who had ongoing symptoms. Some studies focused on individuals with specific symptoms, including those with either post-COVID-19 or long-term symptoms, while other studies included patients based on participation in online peer-support groups. The interventions (I) also varied. Most interventions used a combination of psychological and physical exercises, but they varied in duration, frequency, and social dimensions. The reviewed studies investigated the physical and mental health conditions of patients with post-COVID/long-COVID symptoms. Most studies had no control (C) group, and most studies reported outcomes (O) or improvements in physiological health perception, some physical conditions, fatigue, and some psychological aspects such as depression. However, some studies found no improvements in bowel or bladder problems, concentration, short-term memory, unpleasant dreams, physical ailments, perceived bodily pain, emotional ailments, and perceived mental health. CONCLUSIONS: More systematic research with larger sample sizes is required to overcome sampling bias and include health care professionals' perspectives, as well as help patients mobilize support from health care professionals and social network partners. The evidence so far suggests that patients should be provided with digital interventions to manage symptoms and reintegrate into everyday life, including work.

Terapia de rehabilitación olfatoria en pacientes con síndrome pos-COVID-19 / Olfactory rehabilitation therapy in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome

El olfato desempeña una función importante en el desarrollo diario de la vida de las personas. Sus alteraciones pueden ser cualitativas (disosmias, parosmias o fantosmias) y cuantitativas (hiposmia o anosmia). Estas alteraciones pueden deberse por enfermedades rinosinusales, neurodegenerativas o infecciones respiratorias como el resfriado común, la gripe y también el SARS-CoV-2, el agente causal del COVID-19. En relación a esta etiología, su fisiopatología no es del todo clara y la anosmia es poco distinguible clínicamente del resto de las infecciones virales, con una duración variable desde ocho días hasta más de cuatro semanas, en cuyo caso se denomina síndrome pos-COVID-19 o COVID prolongado. Este cuadro se caracteriza por la presencia de síntomas que se desarrollan durante la enfermedad aguda por COVID-19,y que persisten durante más de cuatro semanas, sin explicación por un diagnóstico alternativo. El autor de este artículo realiza una revisión de la literatura médica a partir de un caso clínico con el fin de identificar y resumir la evidencia disponible sobre la terapia de rehabilitación olfatoria. (AU)

Sense of smell plays an important role in the daily development of people's lives. Its alterations can be both qualitative (dysosmias, parosmias, or phantosmias) and quantitative (hyposmia or anosmia). These alterations may be due to rhinosi-nusal diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and respiratory infections such as common cold, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2,causative agent of COVID-19. In relation to this etiology, its pathophysiology is not entirely clear, and anosmia is clinically indistinguishable from the rest of the viral infections, with a variable duration ranging from eight days to more than four weeks, in which case it would be called post COVID- 19 syndrome or prolonged COVID. This condition is characterized by the presence of symptoms that develop during acute COVID-19 illness and persist for more than four weeks without an explanation by an alternative diagnosis.The author of this article carries out a review of the medical literature based on a clinical case in order to identify and summarize the available evidence on olfactory rehabilitation therapy. (AU)

Mapa de evidências sobre sequelas e reablitação da covid-19 pós-aguda: uma versão atualizada em julho de 2022 / Evidence map on post-acute COVID-19 sequelae and rehabilitation: Update as of July 2022 / Mapa de evidencia sobre las secuelas y la rehabilitación tras la COVID-19 aguda: versión actualizada en julio del 2022

RESUMO Objetivo. Atualizar o mapa de evidências sobre os efeitos de intervenções para reabilitação de covid-19 pós-aguda. Métodos. O escopo da busca foi definido conforme a população (pacientes que tiveram covid-19 sintomática e sequelas da doença pós-aguda), o contexto (intervenções para recuperação das sequelas) e o tipo de estudo (revisão sistemática, revisão sistemática rápida, revisão de escopo ou revisão de revisões). Após a busca na PubMed e na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, dois autores independentes selecionaram estudos de revisão. A atualização do mapa feita em 27 de julho de 2022 seguiu os mesmos procedimentos descritos anteriormente. Resultados. O mapa inicial de evidências continha 22 estudos (quatro revisões sistemáticas, quatro revisões rápidas, quatro revisões de estudos de caso, uma revisão de escopo e nove protocolos de revisão sistemática). Nesta atualização, outros 10 estudos foram incluídos. Foram identificados quatro grupos de intervenções (multimodal, terapêutica, terapias complementares e farmacológica) e sete grupos de desfechos (condições patológicas, doenças/transtornos respiratórios, dor, indicadores fisiológicos e metabólicos, saúde mental/qualidade de vida, funções sensoriais, mortalidade), totalizando 166 associações entre intervenções e desfechos. As terapias complementares tiveram mais associações com os desfechos (n = 94). Entre os desfechos, destacaram-se os indicadores fisiológicos e metabólicos, as condições patológicas e a saúde mental/qualidade de vida (44, 41 e 35 associações, respectivamente). Conclusões. Na atualização do mapa, analisaram-se 69 associações, com destaque para exercício (isolado, multicomponente ou intervenção multimodal, apresentando 23 efeitos positivos e quatro potencialmente positivos) e intervenções farmacológicas e terapias complementares para funções sensoriais (15 associações). O alto número de protocolos indica que a literatura permanece incipiente.

ABSTRACT Objective. To update the evidence map on the effects of interventions for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation. Method. The search scope was defined according to the population (patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and post-acute COVID sequelae), the context (interventions for rehabilitation), and the type of study (systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews or overviews of reviews). Following a search in PubMed and the Virtual Health Library, two independent authors selected the articles for review. The map was updated on July 27, 2022, using the same procedures employed in the initial review. Results. The initial evidence map included 22 studies (four systematic reviews, four rapid reviews, four reviews of case reports, one scoping review, and nine systematic review protocols). In the present update, an additional 10 studies were included. The analysis revealed four groups of interventions (multimodal, therapeutic, complementary, and pharmacological) and seven groups of outcomes (pathological conditions, diseases/respiratory disorders, pain, physiological and metabolic markers, mental health/quality of life, sensory function, and mortality), totaling 166 associations between interventions and outcomes. The highest number of associations was observed for complementary therapies (n = 94). Among the outcomes, the highest number of associations was observed for physiological and metabolic markers, pathological conditions, and mental health/quality of life (44, 41, and 35 associations respectively). Conclusions. The map update involved the analysis of 69 associations, most notably exercise (isolated, multicomponent, or multimodal intervention), with 23 positive and four potentially positive effects) and pharmacologic and complementary therapies for sensorial functions (15 associations). The high number of systematic review protocols indicates that the literature is still incipient.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Actualizar el mapa de evidencia de los efectos de las intervenciones de rehabilitación tras la COVID-19 aguda. Métodos. El alcance de la búsqueda se definió en función de la población (pacientes que habían tenido COVID-19 sintomática y secuelas tras un cuadro agudo de la enfermedad), el contexto (intervenciones de recuperación de las secuelas) y el tipo de estudio (revisión sistemática, revisión sistemática rápida, revisión del alcance o revisión de revisiones). Después de realizar búsquedas en PubMed y en la Biblioteca Virtual de Salud, dos autores independientes seleccionaron los estudios de revisión. En la actualización del mapa realizada el 27 de julio del 2022 se siguieron los mismos procedimientos descritos anteriormente. Resultados. El mapa de evidencia inicial contenía 22 estudios (cuatro revisiones sistemáticas, cuatro revisiones rápidas, cuatro revisiones de estudios de casos, una revisión del alcance y nueve protocolos de revisión sistemática). En esta actualización se incluyeron otros 10 estudios. Se encontraron cuatro grupos de intervenciones (multimodales y terapéuticas, y tratamientos complementarios y farmacológicos) y siete grupos de resultados (afecciones patológicas, enfermedades y trastornos respiratorios, dolor, indicadores fisiológicos y metabólicos, salud mental/calidad de vida, funciones sensoriales y mortalidad), con un total de 166 asociaciones entre las intervenciones y los resultados. Los tratamientos complementarios presentaron más asociaciones con los resultados (n = 94). Entre los resultados, se destacaron los indicadores fisiológicos y metabólicos, las afecciones patológicas y la salud mental/calidad de vida (44, 41 y 35 asociaciones, respectivamente). Conclusiones. En la actualización del mapa, se analizaron 69 asociaciones entre las cuales se destacan el ejercicio (aislado o compuesto o una intervención multimodal, con 23 efectos positivos y cuatro potencialmente positivos) y las intervenciones farmacológicas y los tratamientos complementarios para las funciones sensoriales (15 asociaciones). El elevado número de protocolos indica que la bibliografía sigue siendo incipiente.

E depois da doença Covid-19?: Cuidados de enfermagem de reabilitação / What about after Covid-19 disease?: Rehabilitation nursing care

A pandemia COVID-19 apresenta-se como o maior desafio global do século XXI, é a primeira vez que um vírus atinge proporções alarmantes em todos os continentes, as sequelas desta doença ainda não são totalmente conhecidas, desta forma, é importante intervir na recuperação e manutenção da capacidade funcional de todos os doentes com a síndroma pós-COVID-19, sendo fulcral a intervenção do enfermeiro especialista em enfermagem de reabilitação. Procurou-se estudar a intervenção do EEER ao doente com sequelas da doença Covid 19, uma vez que é considerada uma necessidade emergente de investigação pela falta de informação disponível. A doença COVID-19 afeta principalmente o aparelho respiratório, que pode ir desde doença respiratória ligeira, sem insuficiência respiratória, até pneumonia mais extensa com hipoxemia significativa e eventual evolução para ARDS e/ou Sépsis. A esta doença está associada a necessidade de medidas de isolamento, logo uma maior restrição ao espaço físico e ao leito, existindo maior intolerância ao exercício, diminuição da força muscular, um padrão ventilatório ineficaz e falta de capacidade para eliminar eficazmente a expetoração (Rocha, 2020). A teoria de enfermagem que norteou este trabalho foi a teoria do défice do autocuidado de Dorothea Orem em que o objetivo é a recuperação do autocuidado. A teoria do défice do autocuidado, pretende definir os momentos em que os cuidados de enfermagem são necessários. A necessidade de intervenção do enfermeiro especialista em enfermagem de reabilitação é fundamental pelas sequelas decorrentes da COVID-19. A ação do EEER vai centrar-se na minimização das sequelas e na promoção do autocuidado com vista a melhorar a capacidade funcional. Definiram-se 7 objetivos que procuram responder ao desenvolvimento das competências do EEER e à problemática em questão, para tal procedeu-se a um revisão sistemática da literatura, nas bases de dados CINAHL Complete e MEDLINE Complete, tendo em consideração certos critérios de elegibilidade e exclusão definidos. Este relatório demonstra que na abordagem ao doente com sequelas após doença COVID 19 obtiveram-se ganhos ao nível das alterações respiratórias como a melhoria da dispneia e fadiga, a nível musculosquelético como o aumento da força muscular e ao nível do autocuidado e do estado funcional, constataram-se ganhos na independência.

The COVID-19 pandemic presents itself as the greatest global challenge of the 21st century, it is the first time that a virus has reached alarming proportions on all continents, the sequels of this disease are not yet fully known, therefore, it is important to intervene in the recovery and maintenance of the functional capacity of all patients with post COVID-19 syndrome, in which the intervention of a specialist nurse in rehabilitation nursing is crucial. It was sought to study the rehabilitation specialist nurse intervention to the patient with sequels of Covid-19 disease, as it is considered an emerging research need due to the lack of available information. COVID-19 disease mainly affects the respiratory system, which may range from mild respiratory disease without respiratory failure to more extensive pneumonia with significant hypoxemia and eventual evolution to ARDS and/or sepsis. This disease is associated with the need for isolation measures, thus a greater restriction to the physical space and bedding, increased exercise intolerance, decreased muscle strength, an ineffective ventilatory pattern, and lack of ability to effectively eliminate sputum (Rocha, 2020). The nursing theory that guided my work as Dorothea Orem's self-care deficit theory, in which the goal is the recovery of self-care. The self-care deficit theory aims to define the moments when nursing care is needed. The need for intervention by the nurse specialist in rehabilitation nursing is fundamental due to the sequels resulting from COVID-19. The rehabilitation specialist nurses action will focus on minimizing the sequels and promoting self-care with a view to improving functional capacity. To this end, a systematic literature review was conducted in the CINAHL Complete and MEDLINE Complete databases, taking into account certain defined eligibility and exclusion criteria. This report shows that, in the approach to patients with sequels after COVID-19 disease, gains were obtained in terms of respiratory changes, such as the improvement of dyspnea and fatigue, and musculoskeletal level, such as the increase in muscle strength. In terms of self-care and functional status, gains in independence were observed.

Dyspnea: a map of Cochrane evidence relevant to rehabilitation for people with post COVID-19 condition.

INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation focuses on impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions being informed by the underlying health condition. In the current absence of direct "evidence on" rehabilitation interventions for people with post COVID-19 condition (PCC), we can search and synthesize the indirect "evidence relevant to" coming from interventions effective on the symptoms of PCC in other health conditions. The World Health Organization (WHO) required this information to inform expert teams and provide specific recommendations in their Guidelines. With this overview of reviews with mapping we aimed to synthesize in a map the Cochrane evidence relevant to rehabilitation for dyspnea due to PCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched the last five years' Cochrane Systematic Review (CSRs) using the terms "dyspnea" and its synonyms in the Cochrane Library. We extracted and summarized all the available evidence using a map. We grouped the included CSRs for health conditions and interventions, indicating the effect and the quality of evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We found 371 CSRs published between 2016 and 2021 and included 15 in this overview. We found eight studies on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, two on cancer, and one for bronchiectasis, chronic respiratory disease, cystic fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial lung disease. Effective interventions included pulmonary rehabilitation, also in combination with exercise training, non-invasive ventilation, upper limb training and multicomponent integrated interventions, with very low- to moderate-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: These results are the first step of indirect evidence to generate helpful hypotheses for clinical practice and future research on dyspnea in adults with PCC. They served as the basis for one recommendation on treatments for dyspnea as a PCC symptom published in the current WHO Guidelines for clinical practice.