Optimizing Behçet Uveitis Management: A Review of Personalized Immunosuppressive Strategies.

Behçet uveitis poses significant management challenges, owing to its intricate pathogenesis and the severe prognosis it harbors, frequently culminating in irreversible visual impairment and an elevated risk of blindness. This review synthesizes contemporary insights into personalized immunosuppressive strategies for Behçet uveitis, emphasizing the necessity for a customized approach in recognition of the disease's heterogeneity and the variable responsiveness to treatment. This discourse elaborates on the application, efficacy, and safety profiles of traditional immunosuppressants, highlighting a paradigm shift toward integrative combination therapies aimed at diminishing reliance on glucocorticoids and mitigating their associated adverse effects. This thorough evaluation seeks to enlighten clinical practices and spearhead future investigations aimed at refining the management of Behçet uveitis, championing a personalized, multidisciplinary strategy to amplify therapeutic efficacy and enhance patient quality of life.

Recurrent intra-cardiac thrombosis: A rare manifestation of Behçet's disease.

Behçet's disease is a systemic vasculitis characterized by recurrent bipolar aphtosis and ophthalmic disorders. Cardiac involvement is rarely reported and could be associated to poor prognosis. Intracardiac thrombosis is exceptional and represents a therapeutic issue. We report the case of a young man admitted in internal medicine department for management of prolonged fever and recurrent mouth ulcers.

Recomendaciones SER sobre el tratamiento del síndrome de Behçet refractario / SER recommendations on treatment of refractory Behçet's syndrome

Objetivo: Elaborar recomendaciones multidisciplinares, basadas en la evidencia disponible y el consenso de expertos, para el manejo terapéutico de los pacientes con síndrome de Behçet refractario (difícil de tratar, resistente grave, recidivante grave) al tratamiento convencional. Métodos: Un panel de expertos identificó preguntas clínicas de investigación relevantes para el objetivo del documento. Estas preguntas fueron reformuladas en formato PICO –paciente, intervención, comparación, outcome o desenlace–. A continuación, se realizaron revisiones sistemáticas; la evaluación de la calidad de la evidencia se realizó siguiendo la metodología del grupo internacional de trabajo Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Tras esto, el panel multidisciplinar formuló las recomendaciones. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 4 preguntas PICO relativas a la eficacia y seguridad de los tratamientos farmacológicos sistémicos en los pacientes con síndrome de Behçet con manifestaciones clínicas refractarias a terapia convencional, relacionadas con los fenotipos mucocutáneo y/o articular, vascular, neurológico-parenquimatoso y gastrointestinal. Se formularon un total de 7 recomendaciones estructuradas por pregunta, con base en la evidencia encontrada y el consenso de expertos. Conclusiones: El tratamiento de las manifestaciones clínicas más graves del síndrome de Behçet carece de evidencia científica sólida y no existen documentos de recomendaciones específicas para los pacientes con enfermedad refractaria a la terapia convencional. Con el fin de aportar una respuesta a esta necesidad, se presenta el primer documento de recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología específicas para el abordaje terapéutico de estos pacientes, que servirá de ayuda en la toma de decisiones clínica y la reducción de la variabilidad en la atención.(AU)

Objective: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations based on available evidence and expert consensus for the therapeutic management of patients with refractory Behçet's syndrome (difficult to treat, severe resistant, severe relapse) to conventional treatment. Methods: A group of experts identified clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document. These questions were reformulated in PICO format –patient, intervention, comparison and outcome–. Systematic reviews of the evidence were conducted; the quality of the evidence was evaluated following the methodology of the international working group Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. After that, the multidisciplinary panel formulated the specific recommendations. Results: Four PICO questions were selected regarding the efficacy and safety of systemic pharmacological treatments in patients with Behçet's syndrome with clinical manifestations refractory to conventional therapy related to mucocutaneous and/or articular, vascular, neurological parenchymal and gastrointestinal phenotypes. A total of 7 recommendations were made, structured by question, based on the identified evidence and expert consensus. Conclusions: The treatment of most severe clinical manifestations of Behçet's syndrome lacks solid scientific evidence and, besides, there are no specific recommendation documents for patients with refractory disease. With the aim of providing a response to this need, here we present the first official recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the management of these patients. They are devised as a tool for assistance in clinical decision making, therapeutic homogenisation and to reduce variability in the care of these patients.(AU)

An immune-related adverse event of Behcet's-like syndrome following pembrolizumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the emergence of immunotherapy has renewed therapeutic modality. Different from traditional anti-tumor therapy, immune-related adverse events of skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, lung, endocrine glands commonly occurred. At present, only one case of immune-related adverse event of Behcet's-like syndrome following pembrolizumab treatment was reported in USA, and no one is reported in China. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report a rare case of Behcet's-like symptom following pembrolizumab treatment. A 43-year-old female was diagnosed as lymph node and bone metastasis of adenocarcinoma with unknown primary lesion, probably being of pulmonary origin. She was treated with pembrolizumab 200 mg every three weeks in combination with chemotherapy for 6 cycles, followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy maintenance. However, she developed Behcet's-like syndrome with oral ulcer, genital uler, phlebitis, and vision loss after 9 cycles of pembrolizumab treatment. She was treated with prednisone 5 mg orally three times a day. Two weeks later, dose of glucocorticoid gaven to the patient gradually decreased with improved symptoms. After a treatment-free withdrawal period, the patient requested to continue pembrolizumab treatment. Unfortunately, the above symptoms recurred on the second day following pembrolizumab treatment, and glucocorticoid was taken once again. The symptoms improved and the condition was under control. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the exponential growth of immunocheckpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in a variety of tumors, we should be alert to related adverse events, especially the rare rheumatic manifestations.

SER recommendations on treatment of refractory Behçet's syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To develop multidisciplinary recommendations based on available evidence and expert consensus for the therapeutic management of patients with refractory Behçet's syndrome (BS) (difficult to treat, severe resistant, severe relapse) to conventional treatment. METHODS: A group of experts identified clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document. These questions were reformulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison and outcome). Systematic reviews of the evidence were conducted, the quality of the evidence was evaluated following the methodology of the international working group Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). After that, the multidisciplinary panel formulated the specific recommendations. RESULTS: 4 PICO questions were selected regarding the efficacy and safety of systemic pharmacological treatments in patients with BS with clinical manifestations refractory to conventional therapy related to mucocutaneous and/or articular, vascular, neurological parenchymal and gastrointestinal phenotypes. A total of 7 recommendations were made, structured by question, based on the identified evidence and expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of most severe clinical manifestations of BS lacks solid scientific evidence and, besides, there are no specific recommendation documents for patients with refractory disease. With the aim of providing a response to this need, here we present the first official Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the management of these patients. They are devised as a tool for assistance in clinical decision making, therapeutic homogenisation and to reduce variability in the care of these patients.

Behçet's Disease, Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment Approaches: A Comprehensive Review.

Behçet's disease is a systemic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology. The disease manifests with diverse clinical symptoms, most commonly recurrent oral and genital ulcers, skin lesions, and uveitis, though it can affect multiple organ systems. Diagnosis is primarily clinical due to the lack of a definitive diagnostic test, and management involves a multidisciplinary approach to control inflammation and manage symptoms. Current treatment strategies involve corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, and, increasingly, biological therapies. Behçet's disease exhibits a higher prevalence along the Silk Road, suggesting a role of environmental and genetic factors. Despite significant progress in understanding its clinical characteristics and treatment approaches, gaps remain in our understanding of its pathogenesis. Future research is needed to elucidate the disease's pathophysiology and optimize treatment strategies.

Coexistence of ankylosing spondylitis and Behçet's disease: Successful treatment with upadacitinib.

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and Behçet's disease (BD) are distinct inflammatory disorders, but their coexistence is a rare clinical entity. This case sheds light on managing this complex scenario with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. CASE PRESENTATION: A 42-year-old woman presented with a decade-long history of lower back pain, nocturnal spinal discomfort, recurrent eye issues, oral and genital ulcers, hearing loss, pus formation in the left eye, and abdominal pain. Multidisciplinary consultations and diagnostic tests confirmed AS (HLA-B27 positivity and sacroiliitis) and BD (HLA-B51). Elevated acute-phase markers were observed. CONCLUSION: This case fulfills diagnostic criteria for both AS and BD, emphasizing their coexistence. Notably, treatment with upadacitinib exhibited promising efficacy, underscoring its potential as a therapeutic option in patients with contraindications for conventional treatments. Our findings illuminate the intricate management of patients presenting with these two diverse systemic conditions and advocate for further exploration of JAK inhibitors in similar cases.

Characterization and Management of Amicrobial Pustulosis of the Folds, Aseptic Abscess Syndrome, Behçet Disease, Neutrophilic Eccrine Hidradenitis, and Pyostomatitis Vegetans-Pyodermatitis Vegetans.

Neutrophilic dermatoses are a broadly heterogeneous group of inflammatory skin disorders. This article reviews 5 conditions: amicrobial pustulosis of the folds, aseptic abscess syndrome, Behçet disease, neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis, and pyostomatitis vegetans-pyodermatitis vegetans.The authors include up-to-date information about their epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathologic features, diagnosis, and management.

Neither hepatic steatosis nor fibrosis is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with intestinal Behçet's disease.

BACKGROUND: Behçet's disease (BD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are chronic inflammatory diseases that share pathogenetic mechanisms. In this study, we investigated whether NAFLD influences the clinical outcomes in patients with intestinal BD. METHODS: Patients with intestinal BD and available hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores were recruited between 2005 and 2022. An HSI of ≥30 and FIB-4 of ≥1.45 were used to diagnose hepatic steatosis and significant liver fibrosis, respectively. The primary outcomes were intestinal BD-related hospitalization, surgery, emergency room visits, or the first use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators, or biologic agents for intestinal BD. RESULTS: A total of 780 patients with BD were selected. The prevalence of hepatic steatosis and significant liver fibrosis were 72.3% and 8.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age, prior smoking history, concomitant skin lesions, higher white blood cell count, and lower serum albumin levels were independently associated with an increased risk of clinical relapse (all P < 0.05), whereas hepatic steatosis and significant liver fibrosis were not (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.164, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.923-1.468; P = 0.199 for hepatic steatosis; HR = 0.982, 95% CI 0.672-1.436; P = 0.927 for significant liver fibrosis). CONCLUSION: Hepatic steatosis and liver fibrotic burden were not independently associated with clinical outcomes in patients with intestinal BD.

Does anticoagulation in combination with immunosuppressive therapy prevent recurrent thrombosis in Behçet's disease?

Vascular involvement in Behçet's disease (BD) occurs in up to 50% of patients. The main mechanism of thrombosis is inflammation. Thus, immunosuppressants (IS) are the mainstay of therapy, and adding anticoagulation (AC) is controversial. In daily practice, we observed that patients who received AC in combination with IS experienced less recurrent thrombosis and decided to investigate our BD patients retrospectively. We hypothesized that adding AC to immunosuppressive therapy may lower the risk of recurrent thrombosis. Treatment at the time of first or recurrent thrombotic events was recorded. Events under the only IS and IS + AC treatments were compared. There were 40 patients (33 males). The most common types of first vascular events were deep vein thrombosis (77.5%) followed by pulmonary embolism (PE) (52.5%). One patient did not receive any treatment. Among the 39 patients, 32 received glucocorticoid and at least one of the azathioprine, or cyclophosphamide, anti-TNF, 5 received monotherapy with azathioprine, 1 received monotherapy with corticosteroid, and the remaining 1 received monotherapy with cyclophosphamide. In total, 22 patients (55%) experienced 27 recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) events. Two (7.4%) events while only on AC, 2 (7.4%) events while on AC + IS, and 15 (55.5%) events occurred while on only IS. Eight (19.6%) patients were not receiving any treatment during relapses. The recurrence rate was statistically significantly lower in the IS + AC treatment group compared to IS alone. In conclusion, IS are the mainstay of treatment for BD, and adding AC may help to lower the recurrence risk of thrombotic events.

Long-term efficacy, safety, and cumulative retention rate of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment for patients with Behcet's uveitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and cumulative retention rate of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy for patients with Behcet's uveitis (BU) using meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science and PubMed databases for eligible studies up to December 1, 2022. The quality of each identified study was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's case series literature quality assessment tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 software with a random-effects model. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 1156 patients with BU were included in our analysis. We found that 85.0% of patients achieved ocular inflammation remission after receiving anti-TNF-α treatment, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 78.7% to 90.5%. Additionally, 77.4% (95% CI: 57.5%-92.5%) experienced an improvement in visual acuity (VA). Moreover, the pooled dose reduction of glucocorticoids (GCs) was 11.08 mg (95% CI: -13.34 mg to -8.83 mg). Throughout the follow-up period, the cumulative retention rate of the medication was 67.3% (95% CI: 53.7%-79.6%). Serious adverse events occurred in 5.8% (95% CI: 3.1%-8.9%) of cases, with the three most common types being severe infusion or injection reactions (2.7%; 95% CI: 0.8%-5.4%), tuberculosis (1.3%; 95% CI: 0.0%-3.9%), and bacterial pneumonia (1.3%; 95% CI: 0.1%-3.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed that ocular inflammation remission rates were 89.3% (95% CI: 81.2%-95.5%) for adalimumab treatment and 83.7% (95% CI: 75.3%-90.8%) for infliximab treatment. The drug retention rate after adalimumab therapy was 70.3% (95% CI: 62.0%-78.0%) compared to 66.4% (95% CI: 48.6%-82.2%) for infliximab treatment. Furthermore, the incidence of severe infusion or injection reactions was 2.2% (95% CI: 0.1%-5.8%) following adalimumab treatment and 3.5% (95% CI: 0.7%-7.7%) following infliximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF-α therapy represents an effective treatment for BU patients with favorable safety profile and high drug retention rate and a potential advantage of adalimumab over infliximab in terms of ocular inflammation remission, drug retention, and the incidence of severe infusion or injection reactions.

Behçet's syndrome.

Behçet's syndrome is a rare, chronic multisystemic inflammatory disorder also known as the Silk Route disease due to its geographical distribution. Behçet's syndrome is a multifactorial disease and infectious, genetic, epigenetic, and immunological factors contribute to its pathogenesis. Its heterogeneous spectrum of clinical features include mucocutaneous, articular, ocular, vascular, neurological, and gastrointestinal manifestations that can present with a relapsing and remitting course. Differential diagnosis is often hampered by the non-specific clinical presentation and the absence of laboratory biomarkers or pathognomonic histological features. The therapeutic approach is tailored on the basis of patient-specific manifestations and relies on glucocorticoids, colchicine, and traditional and biological immunosuppressants. Despite progress in the knowledge and management of the disease, unmet needs in diagnostics, monitoring, prediction, and treatment personalisation challenge clinical practice, making Behçet's syndrome a complex disorder associated with an increased risk of morbidity.

[An update on Behçet's syndrome]. / Neues zum Behçet-Syndrom.

Behçet's syndrome (BS, synonym: Behçet's disease, or Adamantiades-Behçet's disease, ABD) is classified as a vasculitis of variable vessel size and can manifest itself in both arterial and venous vessels. Its extensive and at the same time interindividually very different clinical picture is not uncommon a challenge, both with regard to the diagnosis of this rheumatic systemic disease, which is rather rare in our latitudes, and its therapeutic options. In addition to the four cardinal symptoms of recurrent oral aphthae, genital aphthae, skin and eye lesions, the clinical picture offers numerous other manifestations which often require interdisciplinary cooperation. In addition to the above mentioned ocular involvement, which can still lead to blindness if inadequately treated, this is especially true for intestinal and cerebral manifestations as well as for large vessel vasculitis.A final revision of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of Behcet's syndrome (EULAR) was made in 2018, and the recommendations are now established internationally as an important treatment guide. Therapy is based on the leading organ involvement. After adalimumab received approval for the treatment of posterior ocular involvement in 2016, another agent, apremilast, became available in 2020. The drug is recommended for the treatment of recurrent oral aphthae in adult Behçet's patients requiring systemic therapy. Nevertheless, there is a further need for new drugs.This article aims to highlight recent findings in the areas of epidemiology, immunopathogenesis & genetics, clinical findings, and therapy, with an emphasis on clinical relevance.

[Diagnostic modalities of a Behçet uveitis]. / Comment j'explore une uvéite de Behçet.

Behçet disease is a chronic multisystemic inflammatory condition. The ocular disease mainly manifests as a bilateral, non-granulomatous, posterior uveitis or panuveitis, associated with occlusive retinal vasculitis. Uveitis is frequent in Behçet disease, it may be severe, and visually threatening. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are mandatory to preserve visual function. Therefore, the goal of this review is to describe the new diagnosis tools and therapeutic guidelines allowing for a significant improvement of the visual prognosis.

La maladie de Behçet est une pathologie inflammatoire chronique multisystémique. L'atteinte oculaire se caractérise le plus souvent par une panuvéite ou uvéite postérieure bilatérale récidivante, non granulomateuse, associée à une vascularite rétinienne occlusive. L'uvéite associée à la maladie de Behçet est fréquente, sévère et potentiellement cécitante en l'absence d'un diagnostic précoce et d'un traitement adapté. L'objectif de cette revue est de décrire les outils diagnostiques et thérapeutiques ayant permis une amélioration significative du pronostic visuel.

Hypertension as a prominent manifestation secondary to renal artery lesions in pediatric Behcet's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension caused by vascular Behcet's disease (BD) is an important prognostic factor of paediatric BD. However, much less is known about its clinical features. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of paediatric vascular BD complicated by hypertension. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in paediatric BD patients complicated by hypertension treated in the Children's Hospital Capital Institute of Paediatrics from Jan 2009 to Dec 2022. RESULTS: Of 65 BD patients, 6 (9.2%) were complicated by hypertension, 5 patients were female, and the median ages of onset and diagnosis were 9.8 years and 11.3 years, respectively. Three patients were found to have cardiac involvement and hypertensive retinopathy secondary to hypertension. Five of the 6 patients with hypertension had right renal artery involvement, and all of them were treated with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. Four patients were treated with biological agents. One patient with severe renal artery stenosis underwent unsuccessful vascular interventional therapy. After 3-6 years of follow-up, five patients were found to have renal atrophy, and one patient was at stable condition. CONCLUSION: Hypertension in paediatric BD is mainly caused by renal artery involvement. Early recognition and treatment of vascular involvement in BD is important to prevent poor prognosis.