Malunion of a clavicle fracture caused thoracic outlet syndrome in a professional violinist.

Clavicle fractures are a common injury in adults. Most patients are treated non-operatively. In this case report, a 53-year-old professional violinist had a midt shaft clavicula fracture and was treated non-operatively. The fracture healed, but the patient developed thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and a venous thrombosis when playing violin. Surgery with restoration of the normal anatomy alleviated the symptoms and six months later she was symptom free and playing violin again. TOS is a rare complication to clavicle fractures and the treating doctors should be aware of the diagnosis.

A review of arterial thoracic outlet syndrome.

Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a condition in which anatomic abnormalities in the thoracic outlet cause compression of the subclavian or, less commonly, axillary artery. Patients are usually younger and typically have an anatomic abnormality causing the compression. The condition usually goes undiagnosed until patients present with signs of acute or chronic hand or arm ischemia. Workup of this condition includes a thorough history and physical examination; chest x-ray to identify potential anatomic abnormalities; and arterial imaging, such as computed tomographic angiography or duplex to identify arterial abnormalities. Patients will usually require operative intervention, given their symptomatic presentation. Intervention should always include decompression of the thoracic outlet with at least a first-rib resection and any other structures causing external compression. If the artery is identified to have intimal damage, mural thrombus, or is aneurysmal, then arterial reconstruction is warranted. Stenting should be avoided due to external compression. In patients with symptoms of embolization, a combination of embolectomy, lytic catheter placement, and/or therapeutic anticoagulation should be done. Typically, patients have excellent outcomes, with resolution of symptoms and high patency of the bypass graft, although patients with distal embolization may require finger amputation.

Management of thoracic outlet syndrome in patients with hemodialysis access.

Patients with threatened arteriovenous access are often found to have central venous stenoses at the ipsilateral costoclavicular junction, which may be resistant to endovascular intervention. Stenoses in this location may not resolve unless surgical decompression of thoracic outlet is performed to relieve the extrinsic compression on the subclavian vein. The authors reviewed the management of dialysis patients with central venous lesions at the thoracic outlet, as well as the role of surgical decompression with first-rib resection or claviculectomy for salvage of threatened, ipsilateral dialysis access.

Thoracic outlet syndrome in women.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is observed more frequently in women, although the exact causes of this sex disparity remain unclear. By investigating the three types of TOS-arterial, neurogenic, and venous-regarding symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment, this article aims to shed light on the current understanding of TOS, focusing on its variations in women.

Trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions thought to be caused by the compression of neurovascular structures going to the upper extremity. TOS is a difficult disease to diagnose, and surgical treatment remains challenging. Many different surgical techniques for the treatment of TOS have been described in the literature and many reasonable to good outcomes have been reported, which makes it hard for surgeons to determine which techniques should be used. Our aim was to describe the rationale, techniques, and outcomes associated with the surgical treatment of TOS. Most patients in our center are treated primarily through a trans-axillary approach. We will elaborate on the technical details of performing trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression. The essential steps during surgery are illustrated with videos. We focused on the idea behind performing a trans-axillary thoracic outlet decompression in primary cases. Institutional data on the outcomes of this surgical approach are described briefly.

The supraclavicular approach to decompression of the thoracic outlet.

Surgical decompression of the thoracic outlet, along with treatment of the involved nerve or vessel, is the accepted treatment modality when indicated. Although neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is often operated via the axillary approach and venous TOS via the paraclavicular approach, arterial TOS is almost always operated via the supraclavicular approach. The supraclavicular approach provides excellent access to the artery, brachial plexus, phrenic nerve, and the cervical and/or first ribs, along with any bony or fibrous or muscular abnormality that may be causing compression of the neurovascular structures. Even for neurogenic TOS, for which the axillary approach offers good cosmesis, the supraclavicular approach helps with adequate decompression while preserving the first rib. This approach may also be sufficient for thin patients with venous TOS. For arterial TOS, a supraclavicular incision usually suffices for excision of bony abnormality and repair of the subclavian artery.

Systematic review of intermediate and long-term results of thoracic outlet decompression.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) consists of a group of disorders resulting from compression of the neurovascular bundle exiting through the thoracic outlet. TOS can be classified as follows based on the etiology of the pathophysiology: neurogenic TOS, venous TOS, arterial TOS, and mixed TOS. The constellation of symptoms a patient may experience varies, depending on the structures involved. Due to the wide range of etiologies and presenting symptoms, treatments for TOS also differ. Furthermore, most studies focus on the perioperative and short-term outcomes after surgical decompression for TOS. This systematic review aimed to provide a pooled analysis of studies to better understand the intermediate and long-term outcomes of surgical decompression for TOS. We conducted a systematic literature search in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for studies that analyzed long-term outcomes after surgical decompression for TOS. The inclusion period was from January 2015 to May 2023. The primary outcome was postoperative QuickDASH Outcome Measure scores. A total of 16 studies were included in the final analysis. The differences between postoperative and preoperative QuickDASH Outcome Measure scores were calculated, when possible, and there was a mean overall difference of 33.5 points (95% CI, 25.2-41.8; P = .001) after surgical decompression. There was a higher proportion of excellent outcomes reported for patients undergoing intervention for arterial and mixed TOS etiologies, whereas those with venous and neurogenic etiologies had the lowest proportion of excellent outcomes reported. Patients with neurogenic TOS had the highest proportion of poor outcomes reported. In conclusion, surgical decompression for TOS has favorable long-term outcomes, especially in patients with arterial and mixed etiologies.

The infraclavicular approach for venous thoracic outlet syndrome.

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) is an esoteric condition that presents in young, healthy adults. Treatment includes catheter-directed thrombolysis, followed by first-rib resection for decompression of the thoracic outlet. Various techniques for first-rib resection have been described with successful outcomes. The infraclavicular approach is well-suited to treat the most medial structures that are anatomically relevant for vTOS. A narrative review was conducted to specifically examine the literature on infraclavicular exposure for vTOS. The technique for this operation is described, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. The infraclavicular approach is a reasonable choice for definitive treatment of uncomplicated vTOS.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery and robotic-assisted first-rib excision and thoracic outlet syndrome decompression.

Multiple surgical approaches have been used in the management of thoracic outlet syndrome. These approaches have traditionally been "open" approaches and have been associated with the inherent morbidities of an open approach, including a risk of injury to the neurovascular structures due to traction and trauma while resecting the first rib. In addition, there has been concern that recurrence of symptoms may be related to incomplete resection of the rib with conventional open techniques. With the advent of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, surgeons began to explore first-rib resection via a thoracoscopic approach. Unfortunately, the existing video-assisted thoracic surgery technology and equipment was not well suited to working in the apex of the chest. With the introduction and subsequent progress in robotic surgery and instrumentation, this dissection can be performed with all the advantages of robotics, but also with minimal traction and trauma to the neurovascular structures, and incorporates almost complete resection of the rib with minimal residual stump. Robotics has developed as a reliable, safe, and less invasive approach to first-rib resection, yielding excellent results while limiting the morbidity of the procedure.

Diagnosis and management of thoracic outlet syndrome in athletes.

The physical demands of sports can place patients at elevated risk of use-related pathologies, including thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Overhead athletes in particular (eg, baseball and football players, swimmers, divers, and weightlifters) often subject their subclavian vessels and brachial plexuses to repetitive trauma, resulting in venous effort thrombosis, arterial occlusions, brachial plexopathy, and more. This patient population is at higher risk for Paget-Schroetter syndrome, or effort thrombosis, although neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is still the predominant form of the disease among all groups. First-rib resection is almost always recommended for vascular TOS in a young, active population, although a surgical benefit for patients with nTOS is less clear. Practitioners specializing in upper extremity disorders should take care to differentiate TOS from other repetitive use-related disorders, including shoulder orthopedic injuries and nerve entrapments at other areas of the neck and arm, as TOS is usually a diagnosis of exclusion. For nTOS, physical therapy is a cornerstone of diagnosis, along with response to injections. Most patients first undergo some period of nonoperative management with intense physical therapy and training before proceeding with rib resection. It is particularly essential for ensuring that athletes can return to their baselines of flexibility, strength, and stamina in the upper extremity. Botulinum toxin and lidocaine injections in the anterior scalene muscle might predict which patients will likely benefit from first-rib resection. Athletes are usually satisfied with their decisions to undergo first-rib resection, although the risk of rare but potentially career- or life-threatening complications, such as brachial plexus injury or subclavian vessel injury, must be considered. Frequently, they are able to return to the same or a higher level of play after full recovery.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome and controversies in diagnosis and management.

Compression of the neurovascular structures at the level of the scalene triangle and pectoralis minor space is rare, but increasing awareness and understanding is allowing for the treatment of more individuals than in the past. We outlined the recognition, preoperative evaluation, and treatment of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Recent work has illustrated the role of imaging and centrality of the physical examination on the diagnosis. However, a fuller understanding of the spatial biomechanics of the shoulder, scalene triangle, and pectoralis minor musculotendinous complex has shown that, although physical therapy is a mainstay of treatment, a poor response to physical therapy with a sound diagnosis should not preclude decompression. Modes of failure of surgical decompression stress the importance of full resection of the anterior scalene muscle and all posterior rib impinging elements to minimize the risk of recurrence of symptoms. Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a rare but critical cause of disability of the upper extremity. Modern understanding of the pathophysiology and evaluation have led to a sounder diagnosis. Although physical therapy is a mainstay, surgical decompression remains the gold standard to preserve and recover function of the upper extremity. Understanding these principles will be central to further developments in the treatment of this patient population.

Current concepts in clinical features and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

The diagnosis and clinical features of thoracic outlet syndrome have long confounded clinicians, owing to heterogeneity in symptom presentation and many overlapping competing diagnoses that are "more common." Despite the advent and prevalence of high-resolution imaging, along with the increasing awareness of the syndrome itself, misdiagnoses and untimely diagnoses can result in significant patient morbidity. The authors aimed to summarize the current concepts in the clinical features and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

Evaluating the effects of mobile application-based rehabilitation on improving disability and pain in patients with disputed thoracic outlet syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Disputed thoracic outlet syndrome (D.TOS) stands as one of the primary global contributors to physical disability, presenting diagnostic and treatment challenges for patients and frequently resulting in prolonged periods of pain and functional impairment. Mobile applications emerge as a promising avenue in aiding patient self-management and rehabilitation for D.TOS. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a certain mobile application-based rehabilitation on pain relief and the improvement of disability in patients experiencing D.TOS. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients diagnosed with D.TOS randomized 1:1 to either the control group (n = 44) or the intervention group (n = 44). Participants in the control group were provided with a brochure containing standard rehabilitation exercise instructions, a written drug prescription from the physician, and guidance on recommended physical activity levels, including home exercises. In contrast, all participants in the intervention group used the mobile application. Disability and pain levels in patients were assessed after six weeks in both groups. RESULT: Both groups improved pain and disability based on the scaled measurements. According to the questionnaire scale, the intervention group showed a considerable decline in disability; however, there was a significant difference in just one question (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the intervention group showed significant improvement in neck pain NRS (p = 0.024) compared to the control. Based on the shoulder and head pain numeric rate scale (NRSs), both groups showed improvement in disability conditions; but there were no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mobile applications are promising tools for alleviating disabilities and pain in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. This study confirmed the potential of mobile technology to enhance active and corrective physical activity, thereby reducing pain in patients with D.TOS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the identifier IRCT20141221020380N3 (http://www.irct.ir/).

Pediatric thoracic outlet syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex disorder affecting the neurovascular structures of the upper extremity as they traverse from the neck and thorax to the upper extremity. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on pediatric TOS, offering insights into its clinical presentation, etiology, treatment modalities, and outcomes in contrast to those reported in adult TOS. METHODS: A comprehensive search for pediatric TOS in the PubMed database using PRISMA guidelines identified 6 relevant studies published between 2008 and 2022. In total, 227 pediatric TOS cases in 216 patients were analyzed. Data categories explored for TOS in pediatric patients included study design, number of patients included, mean age and sex of patients, TOS type, laterality, bony abnormalities, time to surgery, symptoms, treatment modalities, initial surgical technique, surgical complications, percent lost to follow-up, mean follow-up period, and treatment outcome. RESULTS: The results from the 6 studies of 216 patients show a distinct pattern in pediatric TOS, with a 1.84:1 female-to-male ratio, a mean age of 15.49 years, and a lower prevalence of neurogenic TOS (75%, 95% CI 0.41-0.93; I2 = 86%, p < 0.01) compared with the prevailing literature on adults (87.5%-99%). Venous and arterial TOS accounted for a higher proportion of cases in pediatric patients than in adults, challenging the traditional adult-oriented perspective. Right-sided presentations were more common, reflecting right-arm dominance in most individuals. Additionally, bony abnormalities were more common in adults (30%) than in children (10.65%). Treatments involved mixed methods, predominantly using combinations of muscle resection (95.26%), neurolysis (78.02%), and bone resection (72.41%). Patients had high rates of symptom improvement (89%, 95% CI 0.67-0.97; I2 = 85%, p < 0.01) following surgery, with improvement of symptoms ranging from slight to complete relief. Complications were infrequent (5.66%), and most patients reported positive outcomes. The limitations of this analysis include subjective diagnostic and reporting criteria for TOS given its broad range of presentations. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis brings to light the distinctive characteristics of pediatric TOS and underscores the importance of recognizing these differences to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment in this patient population. Further research is needed to understand the predictive value of conservative treatments, especially in pediatric TOS cases.

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in the Pediatric and Young Adult Population.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess both nonsurgical and operative treatment outcomes of pediatric and young adult patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with TOS, who were seen between January 2010 and August 2022 at a tertiary care pediatric hospital, was conducted. Collected pre- and postoperative data included symptoms, provocative testing (ie, Roo's, Wright's, and Adson's tests), participation in sports or upper-extremity activities, additional operations, and surgical complications. Assessment of operative treatment efficacy was based on pre- and post-provocative testing, pain, venogram results, alleviation of symptoms, and return to previous activity level 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients, (70 females and 26 males) with an average age at onset of 15 ± 4 (4-25) years, met the inclusion criteria for TOS. Among them, 27 had neurogenic TOS, 29 had neurogenic and vasculogenic TOS, 20 had vasculogenic TOS, 19 had Paget-Schroetter Syndrome, and one was asymptomatic. Twenty-six patients were excluded because of less than 6 months of follow-up. Of the remaining 70, 6 (8.6%) patients (4 bilateral and 2 unilateral) underwent nonoperative management with activity modification and physical therapy only, and one was fully discharged because of complete relief of symptoms. Sixty-four (90.1%) patients (45 bilateral and 19 unilateral) underwent surgery. A total of 102 operations were performed. Substantial improvements were observed in provocative maneuvers after surgery. Before surgery, 79.7% were involved in sports or playing musical instruments with repetitive overhead activity, and after surgery, 86.2% of these patients returned to their previous activity level. CONCLUSIONS: Few patients were successfully managed with nonoperative activity modification and physical therapy. In those requiring surgical intervention, first or cervical rib resection with scalenectomy using a supraclavicular approach provided resolution of symptoms with 86.2% of patients being able to return to presymptom sport or activity level. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Nerve entrapment complicating neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome surgery: A 10-year retrospective study.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome results from compression of the brachial plexus. The symptoms are mainly pain, upper-limb weakness and paresthesia. Management always starts with a rehabilitation program, but failure of rehabilitation may necessitate surgery. In practice, we observed that several patients developed secondary distal nerve entrapment in the months following surgery, with no preoperative compression. We aimed to assess the occurrence of distal nerve entrapment after surgery for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in a retrospective cohort study. Seventy-four patients were included; 82% females; mean age, 39.4 ± 9.4 years. There were 36.5% with high intensity and 63.5% with low to moderate intensity work. Eighteen (24.3%) developed secondary upper-limb entrapment at 10.6 ± 5.8 months after surgery. Sixteen had a single entrapment and 2 had two different entrapments. In 10 cases (50%) the ulnar nerve was involved at the elbow, in 7 (35.0%) the radial nerve at the radial tunnel, and in 3 (15.0%) the median nerve. No differences were found between patients with and without secondary nerve entrapment in gender (p = 0.51), mean age (p = 0.44), symptom duration (p = 0.92) or work intensity (p = 0.26). Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to shed light on the underlying mechanisms.

[Long-Term Outcomes after Surgery of the Neurogenic Thoracic-Outlet Syndrome in Adolescents]. / Langzeitergebnisse nach Operation des neurogenen Thoracic-Outlet-Syndroms bei Jugendlichen.

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (nTOS) describes a complex of symptoms caused by the compression of neural structures at the upper thoracic outlet. Typical symptoms include pain, numbness and motor weakness of the affected extremity. The incidence of nTOS is 2-3 per 100,000 and is highest between the ages of 25 and 40. There are only a few studies evaluating the surgical outcomes of nTOS in adolescent patients. In particular, there is a lack of long-term data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study of nTOS cases receiving surgical treatment in our clinic between 2002 and 2021, eight patients between 15 and 18 years of age were included. Demographic data, risk factors, clinical symptoms, clinical functional tests, neurophysiological, radiological and intraoperative findings were evaluated. Postoperative data were recorded using a standardised questionnaire. Decompression of the inferior truncus and the C8 and Th1 nerve roots was performed via a supraclavicular approach. RESULTS: The average duration of symptoms before surgery was two years. Of the eight patients who underwent surgery, six answered the written questionnaire and could be analysed for the study. The average follow-up was nine years (1-18 years). After surgery, all patients experienced pain reduction; three were pain-free in the long run and five no longer required pain medication. Strength improved in all patients, but two patients still had mild motor deficits. Sensory disturbances were reduced in all patients, but residual hypoesthesia persisted in five. With regard to overhead work, half of the patients had no impairment after surgery. All patients were able to work at the time of the survey. Half of the patients pursued their sports activities without impairment, while mild impairment was reported by the other half. CONCLUSION: nTOS in adolescents is a rare compression syndrome. Decompression of the lower parts of the brachial plexus using a supraclavicular approach without resection of the first rib is an adequate treatment. This retrospective study showed that a reduction in pain was achieved in all patients. In some patients, slight sensory and motor disturbances as well as a certain restriction in overhead work persisted. Patients were able to return to sports.

Videothoracoscopic First Rib Resection for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Results of 13 Patients.

PURPOSE: To present the clinical experience in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of first rib resection for patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). METHODS: The files of 13 patients (10 males, 3 females) having unilateral NTOS undergoing first rib resection via VATS were retrospectively investigated. The symptoms, operative times, durations of chest tube and hospital stay, complications, and postoperative courses were analyzed. All patients underwent VATS using a camera port and 3-5 cm utility incision. RESULTS: There was no morbidity. The average operation time was 81 ± 11 min (range 65-100 min). Chest tubes were removed in the first or second postoperative day (mean 1.23 ± 0.43 days). The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was 2.1 ± 0.9 days (range 1-3 days). The average duration of follow-up was 19 ± 13 months (range 2-38 months). Ten patients completed a follow-up during 6 months. One patient (10%) had minor residual symptoms, and the remaining patients (90%) were fully asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: The VATS approach in the resection of the first rib for thoracic outlet syndrome is a safe method. It should be performed with acceptable risks under experienced hands. The magnified view and optimal visualization from the scope are beneficial. Avoiding neurovascular bundle retraction may seem to decrease the postoperative pain.

Modified transmanubrial approach for complicated type 1 cervical rib resection requiring subclavian artery reconstruction.

The transmanubrial musculoskeletal sparing approach (TMA) is commonly used for resecting apical lung tumours with vascular involvement. Non-neoplastic conditions which might require surgical exploration of the thoracic outlet include the 'cervical rib', a clinical condition consisting of an additional rib forming above the first rib and growing from the base of the neck just above the clavicle. Type 1 cervical rib-when a complete cervical rib articulates with the first rib or manubrium of the sternum-is the most challenging scenario where the subclavian artery can be damaged by continuous compression due to the narrow space between clavicle, first rib and supernumerary cervical rib, requiring prosthetic reconstruction of the involved tract. Here, we describe a modified TMA in which the incision in the neck is conducted posteriorly to the sternocleidomastoid muscle, thus allowing safe dissection of the superior and middle trunk of the brachial plexus.