A review of arterial thoracic outlet syndrome.

Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a condition in which anatomic abnormalities in the thoracic outlet cause compression of the subclavian or, less commonly, axillary artery. Patients are usually younger and typically have an anatomic abnormality causing the compression. The condition usually goes undiagnosed until patients present with signs of acute or chronic hand or arm ischemia. Workup of this condition includes a thorough history and physical examination; chest x-ray to identify potential anatomic abnormalities; and arterial imaging, such as computed tomographic angiography or duplex to identify arterial abnormalities. Patients will usually require operative intervention, given their symptomatic presentation. Intervention should always include decompression of the thoracic outlet with at least a first-rib resection and any other structures causing external compression. If the artery is identified to have intimal damage, mural thrombus, or is aneurysmal, then arterial reconstruction is warranted. Stenting should be avoided due to external compression. In patients with symptoms of embolization, a combination of embolectomy, lytic catheter placement, and/or therapeutic anticoagulation should be done. Typically, patients have excellent outcomes, with resolution of symptoms and high patency of the bypass graft, although patients with distal embolization may require finger amputation.

Thoracic outlet syndrome in women.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is observed more frequently in women, although the exact causes of this sex disparity remain unclear. By investigating the three types of TOS-arterial, neurogenic, and venous-regarding symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment, this article aims to shed light on the current understanding of TOS, focusing on its variations in women.

Current concepts in clinical features and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

The diagnosis and clinical features of thoracic outlet syndrome have long confounded clinicians, owing to heterogeneity in symptom presentation and many overlapping competing diagnoses that are "more common." Despite the advent and prevalence of high-resolution imaging, along with the increasing awareness of the syndrome itself, misdiagnoses and untimely diagnoses can result in significant patient morbidity. The authors aimed to summarize the current concepts in the clinical features and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

Diagnosis and management of thoracic outlet syndrome in athletes.

The physical demands of sports can place patients at elevated risk of use-related pathologies, including thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Overhead athletes in particular (eg, baseball and football players, swimmers, divers, and weightlifters) often subject their subclavian vessels and brachial plexuses to repetitive trauma, resulting in venous effort thrombosis, arterial occlusions, brachial plexopathy, and more. This patient population is at higher risk for Paget-Schroetter syndrome, or effort thrombosis, although neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is still the predominant form of the disease among all groups. First-rib resection is almost always recommended for vascular TOS in a young, active population, although a surgical benefit for patients with nTOS is less clear. Practitioners specializing in upper extremity disorders should take care to differentiate TOS from other repetitive use-related disorders, including shoulder orthopedic injuries and nerve entrapments at other areas of the neck and arm, as TOS is usually a diagnosis of exclusion. For nTOS, physical therapy is a cornerstone of diagnosis, along with response to injections. Most patients first undergo some period of nonoperative management with intense physical therapy and training before proceeding with rib resection. It is particularly essential for ensuring that athletes can return to their baselines of flexibility, strength, and stamina in the upper extremity. Botulinum toxin and lidocaine injections in the anterior scalene muscle might predict which patients will likely benefit from first-rib resection. Athletes are usually satisfied with their decisions to undergo first-rib resection, although the risk of rare but potentially career- or life-threatening complications, such as brachial plexus injury or subclavian vessel injury, must be considered. Frequently, they are able to return to the same or a higher level of play after full recovery.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome and controversies in diagnosis and management.

Compression of the neurovascular structures at the level of the scalene triangle and pectoralis minor space is rare, but increasing awareness and understanding is allowing for the treatment of more individuals than in the past. We outlined the recognition, preoperative evaluation, and treatment of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Recent work has illustrated the role of imaging and centrality of the physical examination on the diagnosis. However, a fuller understanding of the spatial biomechanics of the shoulder, scalene triangle, and pectoralis minor musculotendinous complex has shown that, although physical therapy is a mainstay of treatment, a poor response to physical therapy with a sound diagnosis should not preclude decompression. Modes of failure of surgical decompression stress the importance of full resection of the anterior scalene muscle and all posterior rib impinging elements to minimize the risk of recurrence of symptoms. Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a rare but critical cause of disability of the upper extremity. Modern understanding of the pathophysiology and evaluation have led to a sounder diagnosis. Although physical therapy is a mainstay, surgical decompression remains the gold standard to preserve and recover function of the upper extremity. Understanding these principles will be central to further developments in the treatment of this patient population.

Evaluating the effects of mobile application-based rehabilitation on improving disability and pain in patients with disputed thoracic outlet syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Disputed thoracic outlet syndrome (D.TOS) stands as one of the primary global contributors to physical disability, presenting diagnostic and treatment challenges for patients and frequently resulting in prolonged periods of pain and functional impairment. Mobile applications emerge as a promising avenue in aiding patient self-management and rehabilitation for D.TOS. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a certain mobile application-based rehabilitation on pain relief and the improvement of disability in patients experiencing D.TOS. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients diagnosed with D.TOS randomized 1:1 to either the control group (n = 44) or the intervention group (n = 44). Participants in the control group were provided with a brochure containing standard rehabilitation exercise instructions, a written drug prescription from the physician, and guidance on recommended physical activity levels, including home exercises. In contrast, all participants in the intervention group used the mobile application. Disability and pain levels in patients were assessed after six weeks in both groups. RESULT: Both groups improved pain and disability based on the scaled measurements. According to the questionnaire scale, the intervention group showed a considerable decline in disability; however, there was a significant difference in just one question (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the intervention group showed significant improvement in neck pain NRS (p = 0.024) compared to the control. Based on the shoulder and head pain numeric rate scale (NRSs), both groups showed improvement in disability conditions; but there were no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mobile applications are promising tools for alleviating disabilities and pain in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. This study confirmed the potential of mobile technology to enhance active and corrective physical activity, thereby reducing pain in patients with D.TOS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the identifier IRCT20141221020380N3 (http://www.irct.ir/).

Thoracic outlet syndrome in females: A systematic review.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare anatomic condition caused by compression of neurovascular structures as they traverse the thoracic outlet. Depending on the primary structure affected by this spatial narrowing, patients present with one of three types of TOS-venous TOS, arterial TOS, or neurogenic TOS. Compression of the subclavian vein, subclavian artery, or brachial plexus leads to a constellation of symptoms, including venous thrombosis, with associated discomfort and swelling; upper extremity ischemia; and chronic pain due to brachial plexopathy. Standard textbooks have reported a predominance of females patients in the TOS population, with females comprising 70%. However, there have been few comparative studies of sex differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes for the various types of TOS.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: When to consider the diagnosis and current management options.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) refers to a group of compressive disorders that occur in the thoracic outlet and can affect the brachial plexus, subclavian artery and vein. Neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is the most common form of TOS, accounting for approximately 97% of cases. nTOS and its resulting compressive brachial plexopathy can lead to potentially disabling symptoms and reduced quality of life. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the current literature on nTOS and summarises the pathophysiology, diagnostic pathways and the management options for nTOS. DISCUSSION: nTOS is an uncommon but disabling disorder with no single 'rule-in' test, often resulting in diagnostic delays and late referral. Initial management is non-operative with targeted physiotherapy. If this is unsuccessful, symptoms can be relieved with scalene botulinum toxin injections and surgical intervention.

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in Division 1 Collegiate Athletes: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Athletes who engage in repetitive upper-extremity exercise are susceptible to neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS). We sought to identify typical presenting symptoms and common findings on diagnostic workup, in addition to evaluating rates of return to play following various treatment interventions. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Medical records of Division 1 athletes containing the diagnosis of nTOS between the years 2000 and 2020 were identified. Athletes with arterial or venous thoracic outlet syndrome were excluded. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Demographics, sport, participation status, clinical presentation, physical examination findings, diagnostic workup, and treatments provided. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of return to play (RTP) to collegiate athletics. RESULTS: Twenty-three female and 13 male athletes were diagnosed and treated for nTOS. Digit plethysmography showed diminished or obliterated waveforms with provocative maneuvers in 23 of 25 athletes. Forty-two percent were able to continue competing despite symptoms. Of the athletes who were initially unable to compete, 12% returned to full competition after physical therapy alone, 42% of those remaining were able to RTP after botulinum toxin injection, and an additional 42% of the remaining athletes RTP after thoracic outlet decompression surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Many athletes diagnosed with nTOS will be able to continue competing despite symptoms. Digit plethysmography is a sensitive diagnostic tool for nTOS to document anatomical compression at the thoracic inlet. Botulinum toxin injection had a significant positive effect on symptoms and a high rate of RTP (42%), allowing numerous athletes to avoid surgery and its prolonged recovery and associated risks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that botulinum toxin injection had a high rate of return to full competition in elite athletes without the risks and recovery needed for surgical intervention, suggesting that this may be a good intervention especially among elite athletes who only experience symptoms with sport-related activities.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TROTS) registry: A study protocol for the primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis section.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of comprehensive and uniform data on primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (pUEDVT). pUEDVT includes venous thoracic outlet syndrome related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) and idiopathic UEDVT. Research on these conditions has been hampered by their rarity, lack of uniform diagnostic criteria, and heterogeneity in therapeutic strategies. To improve current research data collection using input of all various pUEDVT treating medical specialists, we initiated the ThoRacic OuTlet Syndrome (TROTS) registry. The aim of the TROTS registry is to a) collect extensive data on all pUEDVT patients through a predefined protocol, b) give insight in the long term outcome using patient reported outcome measures, c) create guidance in the diagnostic and clinical management of these conditions, and thereby d) help provide content for future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The TROTS registry was designed as an international prospective longitudinal observational registry for data collection on pUEDVT patients. All pUEDVT patients, regardless of treatment received, can be included in the registry after informed consent is obtained. All relevant data regarding the initial presentation, diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up will be collected prospectively in an electronic case report form. In addition, a survey containing general questions, a Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and Functional Disability questionnaire (Quick-DASH) will be sent periodically (at the time of inclusion, one and two years after inclusion, and every five years after inclusion) to the participant. The registry protocol was approved by the Medical Ethical Review Board and registered in the Netherlands Trial Register under Trial-ID NL9680. The data generated by the registry will be used for future research on pUEDVT and published in peer reviewed journals. CONCLUSION: TROTS registry data will be used to further establish the optimal management of pUEDVT and lay the foundation for future research and guidelines.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in the overhead and throwing athlete: A narrative review.

Thoracic outlet syndrome is an important cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction due to compression of neurovascular structures as they traverse the thoracic outlet. Symptoms are most commonly due to compression of the brachial plexus called neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS). Throwing athletes are at increased risk of nTOS because of a variety of biomechanical factors. However, because nTOS symptoms are often nonspecific, delayed diagnosis is common. Neurogenic thoracic outlet largely remains a diagnosis of exclusion with advanced imaging ruling out vascular involvement and diagnostic injections gaining favor in helping localize sites of compression. Although rehabilitation alone may improve symptoms in some athletes, many require surgical treatment for long-term relief. This generally entails decompression of the thoracic outlet by some combination of muscle release, brachial plexus neurolysis, and first rib resection. Outcomes tend to be successful in athletes with most achieving resolution of symptoms and return to athletic activity. NTOS is an important cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction in throwing athletes. The history and physical examination should focus on activities that exacerbate symptoms. Treatment of nTOS generally requires surgical intervention and allows throwing athletes to return to sport.

When Healing Hands Hurt: Epidemiology of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Among Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is an infrequent condition which results in disability in use of upper extremity. While TOS is often associated with manual labor, industrial workers, and accidents, it has not been reported in a physician (MD) population. Given the investment of time and effort in training to become a MD, the impact of TOS may be devastating. Our objective is to report the presentation and outcome of TOS in MDs. METHODS: A prospectively surgical database was reviewed for MDs who sought care of disabling TOS between 1997 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, outcome and pathological data were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed based on Somatic Pain Scale (SPS), Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, and Derkash scores. Results were also assessed based on return to employment. RESULTS: A total of 19 MDs were identified, from 1,687 TOS cases. The group included 13 (63%) men, 6 (31%) women, average age 45 years (range 27-57). Presentations included 1 (5.3%) arterial TOS (ATOS), 9 (47.4%) venous TOS (VTOS), and 9 (47.4) neurogenic TOS (NTOS). All patients were right-handed, and symptomatic side was dominant hand in 7 (37%) patients. Etiologies included repetitive motion injury, athletic injury, and congenital bony abnormalities. Repetitive motion was associated with 3/9 (33%) NTOS. Significant athletic activities were noted in 12 of 19 (63%) MDs, including 8/9 (89%) VTOS and 4/9 (44%) NTOS. Athletic activities associated with VTOS included triathletes (2), rock climbing (1), long distance swimming (2), and weightlifting (3). Of the 9 NTOS cases, 3 were associated with weightlifting and 1 with skiing. Congenital causes included 1 (5%) abnormal first rib and 1 (5%) cervical rib. Time from symptom onset to consultation varied significantly according to diagnosis: ATOS 6 days, VTOS 97 days, and NTOS 2,335 days (P < 0.05). All underwent first rib resection (FRR), and 4 (4) patients required contralateral FRR. Time from surgery to last follow-up averaged 1,005 days (range: 37-4,535 days). On presentation, 6 patients were work disabled and 13 patients were work restricted. Following surgery, 4 MDs remained work restricted with mild to moderate symptoms. After surgery, standardized outcomes (SPS, Quick DASH, and Derkash score) improved in all metrics. All who were initially disabled returned to work without restriction. Significant non-TOS related comorbidities were present in all who had residual restriction. Return to work was documented in all. CONCLUSIONS: Although it has not been reported, MDs are subject to developing TOS. Causes include repetitive motions, athletic injuries, and congenital bony abnormalities. Surgical decompression is beneficial with significant reduction in pain and disability. MDs are highly motivated and insightful; accordingly, they have a very high probability of successful work resumption, with all returning to their medical positions.

Thoracic outlet syndrome: a review for the primary care provider.

CONTEXT: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) symptoms are prevalent and often confused with other diagnoses. A PubMed search was undertaken to present a comprehensive article addressing the presentation and treatment for TOS. OBJECTIVES: This article summarizes what is currently published about TOS, its etiologies, common objective findings, and nonsurgical treatment options. METHODS: The PubMed database was conducted for the range of May 2020 to September 2021 utilizing TOS-related Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) systematic literature review was conducted to identify the most common etiologies, the most objective findings, and the most effective nonsurgical treatment options for TOS. RESULTS: The search identified 1,188 articles. The automated merge feature removed duplicate articles. The remaining 1,078 citations were manually reviewed, with articles published prior to 2010 removed (n=771). Of the remaining 307 articles, duplicate citations not removed by automated means were removed manually (n=3). The other exclusion criteria included: non-English language (n=21); no abstracts available (n=56); and case reports of TOS occurring from complications of fractures, medical or surgical procedures, novel surgical approaches, or abnormal anatomy (n=42). Articles over 5 years old pertaining to therapeutic intervention (mostly surgical) were removed (n=18). Articles pertaining specifically to osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) were sparse and all were utilized (n=6). A total of 167 articles remained. The authors added a total of 20 articles that fell outside of the search criteria, as they considered them to be historic in nature with regards to TOS (n=8), were related specifically to OMT (n=4), or were considered sentinel articles relating to specific therapeutic interventions (n=8). A total of 187 articles were utilized in the final preparation of this manuscript. A final search was conducted prior to submission for publication to check for updated articles. Symptoms of hemicranial and/or upper-extremity pain and paresthesias should lead a physician to evaluate for musculoskeletal etiologies that may be contributing to the compression of the brachial plexus. The best initial provocative test to screen for TOS is the upper limb tension test (ULTT) because a negative test suggests against brachial plexus compression. A positive ULTT should be followed up with an elevated arm stress test (EAST) to further support the diagnosis. If TOS is suspected, additional diagnostic testing such as ultrasound, electromyography (EMG), or magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography (MRI/MRA) might be utilized to further distinguish the vascular or neurological etiologies of the symptoms. Initial treatment for neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is often conservative. Data are limited, therefore there is no conclusive evidence that any one treatment method or combination is more effective. Surgery in nTOS is considered for refractory cases only. Anticoagulation and surgical decompression remain the treatment of choice for vascular versions of TOS. CONCLUSIONS: The most common form of TOS is neurogenic. The most common symptoms are pain and paresthesias of the head, neck, and upper extremities. Diagnosis of nTOS is clinical, and the best screening test is the ULTT. There is no conclusive evidence that any one treatment method is more effective for nTOS, given limitations in the published data. Surgical decompression remains the treatment of choice for vascular forms of TOS.

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) refers to a group of disorders in which there is compression of and/or damage to the neurovascular structures at the thoracic outlet, i.e., at the transition from chest to neck. The incidence of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is estimated to be 2-3 / 100 000 / year, with an estimated prevalence of 10 / 100 000. Patients present with upper extremity sensorimotor symptoms that are often related to movement. The aim of the present article is to highlight the clinical presentation patterns of nTOS and to provide an overview of its diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Selective literature search for prospective observational studies and RCTs, including systematic reviews and metaanalyses. RESULTS: There is no multicenter randomized controlled trial available on the treatment of nTOS. Prospective observational studies with a hierarchical study design report a positive effect of physiotherapy in 27-59% of cases. After unsuccessful conservative treatment, up to 56-90% benefit from surgical management. Patients with nTOS are more severely affected compared with those with other forms of TOS and benefit less from transaxillary first rib resection. nTOS patients who underwent supraclavicular decompression without rib resection had excellent surgical outcomes in 27%, good outcomes in 36%, acceptable outcomes in 26%, and poor surgical outcomes in 11% of cases. There is no systematic comparison available of the types of surgical management involved. Also, there is currently no uniform classification available for all medical sub-disciplines. Therefore, interpretation, and comparability of the study results are limited. CONCLUSION: Although nTOS is the most common form of TOS, studies on its treatment are currently limited in terms of numbers and quality. The type of surgical management varies according to the experience and preference of the surgeon, treating specialty, special anatomic features, and clinical symptoms.

Thoracic outlet syndrome: a review.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare condition (1-3 per 100,000) caused by neurovascular compression at the thoracic outlet and presents with arm pain and swelling, arm fatigue, paresthesias, weakness, and discoloration of the hand. TOS can be classified as neurogenic, arterial, or venous based on the compressed structure(s). Patients develop TOS secondary to congenital abnormalities such as cervical ribs or fibrous bands originating from a cervical rib leading to an objectively verifiable form of TOS. However, the diagnosis of TOS is often made in the presence of symptoms with physical examination findings (disputed TOS). TOS is not a diagnosis of exclusion, and there should be evidence for a physical anomaly that can be corrected. In patients with an identifiable narrowing of the thoracic outlet and/or symptoms with a high probability of thoracic outlet neurovascular compression, diagnosis of TOS can be established through history, a physical examination maneuvers, and imaging. Neck trauma or repeated work stress can cause scalene muscle scaring or dislodging of a congenital cervical rib that can compress the brachial plexus. Nonsurgical treatment includes anti-inflammatory medication, weight loss, physical therapy/strengthening exercises, and botulinum toxin injections. The most common surgical treatments include brachial plexus decompression, neurolysis, and scalenotomy with or without first rib resection. Patients undergoing surgical treatment for TOS should be seen postoperatively to begin passive/assisted mobilization of the shoulder. By 8 weeks postoperatively, patients can begin resistance strength training. Surgical treatment complications include injury to the subclavian vessels potentially leading to exsanguination and death, brachial plexus injury, hemothorax, and pneumothorax. In this review, we outline the diagnostic tests and treatment options for TOS to better guide clinicians in recognizing and treating vascular TOS and objectively verifiable forms of neurogenic TOS.

Imaging to intervention: Thoracic outlet syndrome.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a clinical disorder resulting from compression of the neurovascular bundle of the lower neck and upper chest. TOS can be categorized into neurogenic, venous, and arterial subtypes which result from anatomical compression of the brachial plexus, subclavian vein, and subclavian artery, respectively. This can lead to neurogenic pain as well as vascular injury with thrombosis and thromboembolism. Interventional and diagnostic radiologists play a critical role in the imaging diagnosis and treatment of vascular TOS. Prompt imaging and endovascular management with surgical collaboration has been shown to provide the most successful and long-lasting clinical outcomes, from vessel patency to symptom relief. In this article, we review the anatomy and clinical presentations of TOS as well as the initial imaging modalities used for diagnosis. Furthermore, we detail the role of the diagnostic and interventional radiologist in the management of TOS, including pre-procedure and endovascular interventions, along with medical and surgical treatments. PRECIS: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiologists play a key role in diagnosis and management of vascular thoracic outlet syndromes and are critical for timely and successful outcomes.

Optimal management of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: Is venous thoracic outlet syndrome underrecognized?

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) accounts for ~10% of all cases of DVT. In the most widely referenced general review of DVT, the American Academy of Chest Physicians essentially recommended that UEDVT be treated identically to that of lower extremity DVT, with anticoagulation the default therapy. However, the medical literature has not differentiated well between DVT in the arm vs DVT in the leg and has not emphasized the effects of the costoclavicular junction and the lack of the effect of gravity to the point at which UEDVT due to extrinsic bony compression at the costoclavicular junction is classified as "primary." METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review, beginning with both Medline and Google Scholar searches, in addition to collected references. Next, we manually reviewed the relevant citations within the initial reports studied. Both surgical and medical journals were explored. RESULTS: It has been proposed that "effort thrombosis" should be classified as a secondary cause of UEDVT, limiting the definition of "primary" to that which is truly idiopathic. Other causes of secondary UEDVT include catheter- and pacemaker-related thrombosis (the most common cause but often asymptomatic), thrombosis related to malignancy and hypercoagulable conditions, and the rare case of thrombosis due to compression of the vein by a focal malignancy or other space-occupying lesion. In true primary UEDVT and those secondary cases in which no mechanical cause is present or can be corrected, anticoagulation remains the treatment of choice, usually for 3 months or the duration of a needed catheter. However, evidence has suggested that many cases of effort thrombosis are likely missed by a too-narrow adherence to this protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Because proper treatment of effort thrombosis would decrease the long-term symptomatic status rate from 50% to almost 0% and because these are healthy patients with a long lifespan, we believe that a more aggressive attitude toward thrombolysis should be followed for any patient with a reasonable degree of suspicion for venous thoracic outlet syndrome.

Update on the thoracic outlet syndrome and plexus brachial syndrome: Specific clinical examination (for all) and rehabilitation protocol.

The diagnosis of uncomplicated forms of thoracobrachial outlet syndrome (TOS) and brachial plexus stretching syndrome (BPSS) is imprecise due to the lack of clear differentiation between dynamic vascular or neurological compression and brachial plexus stretching without vascular compression. After a review of literature, we propose and describe a simple way for clinical assessment of TOS, BPSS or association of both comprising 1 clinical sign and 2 manoeuvres. This clinical assessment can be performed by the medical doctor, the physiotherapist and the surgeon. The clinical diagnosis is essential because it will dictate the rehabilitation treatment. We propose and describe also a rehabilitation protocol comprising 10 phases with modulation of exercises according to clinical form (TOS, BPSS or association) and/or severity of symptoms. The physiotherapist has a capital role and is the guarantor of the effectiveness of the medical treatment. In France, a training is now available thanks to personal continuous development for diagnosis and treatment of TOS and BPSS. This is essential in order to propose an optimal care to patients.

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in Athletes - Nonsurgical Treatment Options.

ABSTRACT: Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is an etiologically and clinically diverse disorder caused by compression of the brachial plexus traversing the thoracic outlet. Athletes who perform repetitive overhead activities are at risk of developing NTOS with sport-specific symptoms. This article reviews the controversial NTOS nomenclature, common sites of anatomic compression, and red flag symptoms that require immediate intervention. It also reviews the congenital, traumatic, and functional etiologies of NTOS, with a discussion of the differential diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, and workup for NTOS. Nonsurgical treatment is highlighted with an emphasis on thoracic outlet syndrome-specific physical therapy and updates on injection options and ultrasound guided hydrodissection. This article compares nonsurgical versus surgical functional outcome data with an emphasis on athletes with NTOS. Functional assessment tools and performance metrics for athletes are reviewed, as well as return to sport considerations.