Genetic testing for familial melanoma.

While the average lifetime risk of melanoma worldwide is approximately 3%, those with inherited high-penetrance mutations face an increased lifetime risk of 52-84%. In countries of low melanoma incidence, such as in Southern Europe, familial melanoma genetic testing may be warranted when there are two first degree relatives with a melanoma diagnosis. Testing criteria for high incidence countries such as USA, or with very-high incidence, such as Australia and New Zealand, would require a threshold of 3 to 4 affected family members. A mutation in the most common gene associated with familial melanoma, CDKN2A, is identified in approximately 10-40% of those meeting testing criteria. However, the use of multi-gene panels covering additional less common risk genes can significantly increase the diagnostic yield. Currently, genetic testing for familial melanoma is typically conducted by qualified genetic counsellors, however with increasing demand on testing services and high incidence rate in certain countries, a mainstream model should be considered. With appropriate training, dermatologists are well placed to identify high risk individuals and offer melanoma genetic test in dermatology clinics. Genetic testing should be given in conjunction with pre- and post-test consultation. Informed patient consent should cover possible results, the limitations and implications of testing including inconclusive results, and potential for genetic discrimination. Previous studies reporting on participant outcomes of genetic testing for familial melanoma have found significant improvements in both sun protective behavior and screening frequency in mutation carriers.

Prognosis of CDKN2A germline mutation in patients with familial melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Familial melanoma is defined as melanoma occurring in two or more first-degree relatives by the WHO. Germline mutations are isolated in a subset of them. It is well known that CDKN2A is the most frequently mutated high-risk gene in familial melanoma, however, the prognosis it confers to patients who carry its mutations is still controversial. This review aims to assess whether germline mutations imply a worse prognosis in patients with familial melanoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching the electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Data from 3 independent populations were eventually included in the meta-analysis, involving 291 cases and 57 416 controls. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there is a tendency for patients with germline mutations in the CDKN2A gene to have a worse overall survival (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.99-1.69, P  = 0.05) and melanoma-specific survival (HR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.97-2.31, P  = 0.07). Carrier patients would not only have more incidence of melanoma and a higher risk of a second melanoma, but they also seem to have a worse prognosis. The inclusion of gene panel testing in clinical practice and the collaboration within consortia are needed to provide further evidence on the prognosis of these patients.

Consistency of convolutional neural networks in dermoscopic melanoma recognition: A prospective real-world study about the pitfalls of augmented intelligence.

BACKGROUND: Deep-learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have outperformed even experienced dermatologists in dermoscopic melanoma detection under controlled conditions. It remains unexplored how real-world dermoscopic image transformations affect CNN robustness. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the consistency of melanoma risk assessment by two commercially available CNNs to help formulate recommendations for current clinical use. METHODS: A comparative cohort study was conducted from January to July 2022 at the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel. Five dermoscopic images of 116 different lesions on the torso of 66 patients were captured consecutively by the same operator without deliberate rotation. Classification was performed by two CNNs (CNN-1/CNN-2). Lesions were divided into four subgroups based on their initial risk scoring and clinical dignity assessment. Reliability was assessed by variation and intraclass correlation coefficients. Excisions were performed for melanoma suspicion or two consecutively elevated CNN risk scores, and benign lesions were confirmed by expert consensus (n = 3). RESULTS: 117 repeated image series of 116 melanocytic lesions (2 melanomas, 16 dysplastic naevi, 29 naevi, 1 solar lentigo, 1 suspicious and 67 benign) were classified. CNN-1 demonstrated superior measurement repeatability for clinically benign lesions with an initial malignant risk score (mean variation coefficient (mvc): CNN-1: 49.5(±34.3)%; CNN-2: 71.4(±22.5)%; p = 0.03), while CNN-2 outperformed for clinically benign lesions with benign scoring (mvc: CNN-1: 49.7(±22.7)%; CNN-2: 23.8(±29.3)%; p = 0.002). Both systems exhibited lowest score consistency for lesions with an initial malignant risk score and benign assessment. In this context, averaging three initial risk scores achieved highest sensitivity of dignity assessment (CNN-1: 94%; CNN-2: 89%). Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated 'moderate'-to-'good' reliability for both systems (CNN-1: 0.80, 95% CI:0.71-0.87, p < 0.001; CNN-2: 0.67, 95% CI:0.55-0.77, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Potential user-induced image changes can significantly influence CNN classification. For clinical application, we recommend using the average of three initial risk scores. Furthermore, we advocate for CNN robustness optimization by cross-validation with repeated image sets. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04605822).

Pitfalls of PRAME Immunohistochemistry in a Large Series of Melanocytic and Nonmelanocytic Lesions With Literature Review.

ABSTRACT: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is currently used to facilitate distinction of benign and malignant melanocytic proliferations. We hypothesized that evaluation of 1 institution's experience with PRAME labeling in a large number of consecutive cases might elucidate additional strengths and potential pitfalls and reveal base rates of positivity versus negativity in 1 academic practice. Pathology reports for all specimens on which PRAME labeling was performed at our institution between January 2021 and May 2022 were retrieved from our database. Eighty percent of conventional malignant melanomas were labeled diffusely positive with PRAME; there were no significant differences in mean age, sex, site, Breslow depth, ulceration status, or American Joint Committee on Cancer pathological tumor stage when comparing diffusely PRAME-positive malignant melanomas with those that lack diffuse labeling. Although no banal melanocytic nevi were labeled with PRAME, 13% of dysplastic nevi were diffusely PRAME positive, with junctional proliferations, severe atypia, male gender, and older age being associated with PRAME positivity. As some but not all ambiguous melanocytic lesions in which malignancy could not be excluded based on morphology alone were diffusely PRAME positive, PRAME's accuracy in predicting malignancy remains unclear to the authors; further study is needed to assess the precision to which PRAME immunohistochemistry can separate benign borderline lesions from their malignant counterparts. Among nonmelanocytic lesions, some poorly differentiated tumors, including atypical fibroxanthomas, can be PRAME positive. This series underscores the importance of clinicopathologic correlation and shows that diffuse PRAME positivity is highest in conventional malignant melanomas (∼80%, or 8 of 10 lesions), is seen in about half of challenging borderline lesions at our institution, and can be observed in lesions diagnosed as dysplastic nevi by our group (∼10% or 1 in 10 lesions), as well as in rare poorly differentiated malignancies.

Encuesta sobre el manejo del nevus displásico por los dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV) / Survey on the Management of Dysplastic Nevus by Dermatologists in the Center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV)

Antecedentes y objetivos No existen guías clínicas para el manejo del nevus displásico (ND). Determinaremos el porcentaje de dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV) que ampliarían márgenes o tendrían actitud conservadora en un ND, y si los antecedentes personales (AP) y/o familiares (AF) de melanoma modificarían la actitud tomada frente a un paciente sin antecedentes de interés. Material y métodos Se difundió la encuesta a 738 dermatólogos y se recogieron datos de forma anónima del 15 de junio de 2022 al 31 de julio de 2022. Las variables de exposición fueron el grado de displasia (bajo/alto), los márgenes (afecto/libre) y los antecedentes de melanoma (sin antecedentes/AF/AP). Las variables dependientes (actitud) incluyeron observación/márgenes de 1-4mm /márgenes 5-10mm. Resultados Se recibieron 86 respuestas. Si el patólogo informase bordes afectos en un ND de bajo grado, el 60,5% ampliarían márgenes de 1 a 4mm, mientras que si los márgenes están libres el 97,7%, tendrían una actitud conservadora. Si el patólogo informara bordes afectos en un ND de alto grado, solo el 1,2% tendrían una actitud conservadora, porcentaje que se incrementa notablemente si los márgenes están libres (68,6%). El AF o el AP de melanoma no influirían en la actitud de la mayoría. Conclusiones El manejo del ND no es uniforme entre los dermatólogos de la sección centro de la AEDV, especialmente en el caso de ND de bajo grado con bordes afectos y ND de alto grado con bordes libres. El AF o el AP de melanoma no modifican en la mayor parte de los casos la actitud clínica (AU)

Background and objectives There are no clinical guidelines on the management of dysplastic nevus (DN). The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of dermatologists in the center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) who would manage a histologically confirmed DN with a watch-and-wait approach or with wider surgical margins and to investigate whether their attitudes would vary depending on whether or not the patient had a personal and/or family history of melanoma. Material and methods We collected data from an anonymous survey sent to 738 dermatologists between June 15 and July 31, 2022. The independent variables were degree of dysplasia (low vs. high), margin status (positive vs. negative), and a personal or family history of melanoma (yes vs. no in both cases). The dependent variables were attitude towards management (watch-and-wait vs. re-excision with a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm or re-excision with a surgical margin of 5 to 10mm). Results We obtained 86 responses to the questionnaire. When pathology indicated a low-grade DN, 60.5% of dermatologists stated they would obtain a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm if the first margins were positive, and 97.7% would watch and wait if the report described negative margins. For high-grade DNs, 1.2% of dermatologists would watch and wait to manage DN with positive margins; 68.8% would use this approach for negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma had no influence on most of the dermatologists’ attitudes. Conclusions Management strategies for DN among dermatologists from the center-Spain section of the AEDV varied, particularly when faced with low-grade DN with positive margins and high-grade DN with negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma did not influence clinical attitudes in most cases (AU)

[Translated article] Survey on the Management of Dysplastic Nevus by Dermatologists in the Center-Spain Section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) / Encuesta sobre el manejo del nevus displásico por los dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV)

Background and objectives There are no clinical guidelines on the management of dysplastic nevus (DN). The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of dermatologists in the center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) who would manage a histologically confirmed DN with a watch-and-wait approach or with wider surgical margins and to investigate whether their attitudes would vary depending on whether or not the patient had a personal and/or family history of melanoma. Material and methods We collected data from an anonymous survey sent to 738 dermatologists between June 15 and July 31, 2022. The independent variables were degree of dysplasia (low vs. high), margin status (positive vs. negative), and a personal or family history of melanoma (yes vs. no in both cases). The dependent variables were attitude towards management (watch-and-wait vs. re-excision with a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm or re-excision with a surgical margin of 5 to 10mm). Results We obtained 86 responses to the questionnaire. When pathology indicated a low-grade DN, 60.5% of dermatologists stated they would obtain a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm if the first margins were positive, and 97.7% would watch and wait if the report described negative margins. For high-grade DNs, 1.2% of dermatologists would watch and wait to manage DN with positive margins; 68.8% would use this approach for negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma had no influence on most of the dermatologists’ attitudes. Conclusions Management strategies for DN among dermatologists from the center-Spain section of the AEDV varied, particularly when faced with low-grade DN with positive margins and high-grade DN with negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma did not influence clinical attitudes in most cases (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos No existen guías clínicas para el manejo del nevus displásico (ND). Determinaremos el porcentaje de dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV) que ampliarían márgenes o tendrían actitud conservadora en un ND, y si los antecedentes personales (AP) y/o familiares (AF) de melanoma modificarían la actitud tomada frente a un paciente sin antecedentes de interés. Material y métodos Se difundió la encuesta a 738 dermatólogos y se recogieron datos de forma anónima del 15 de junio de 2022 al 31 de julio de 2022. Las variables de exposición fueron el grado de displasia (bajo/alto), los márgenes (afecto/libre) y los antecedentes de melanoma (sin antecedentes/AF/AP). Las variables dependientes (actitud) incluyeron observación/márgenes de 1-4mm /márgenes 5-10mm. Resultados Se recibieron 86 respuestas. Si el patólogo informase bordes afectos en un ND de bajo grado, el 60,5% ampliarían márgenes de 1 a 4mm, mientras que si los márgenes están libres el 97,7%, tendrían una actitud conservadora. Si el patólogo informara bordes afectos en un ND de alto grado, solo el 1,2% tendrían una actitud conservadora, porcentaje que se incrementa notablemente si los márgenes están libres (68,6%). El AF o el AP de melanoma no influirían en la actitud de la mayoría. Conclusiones El manejo del ND no es uniforme entre los dermatólogos de la sección centro de la AEDV, especialmente en el caso de ND de bajo grado con bordes afectos y ND de alto grado con bordes libres. El AF o el AP de melanoma no modifican en la mayor parte de los casos la actitud clínica (AU)

"THE DANGEROUS BRASSIERE" AND THE NEVUS ASSOCIATED POLYPOID MELANOMA: CONNECTION SEEMS PLAUSIBLE?

The development of cutaneous melanoma of the skin based on dysplastic nevus is not uncommon. The causes of the progression of nevi to melanomas are numerous and not well understood at present. Certain genetic and epigenetic factors have a major influence on this evolution. We describe a 46-year-old female patient with multiple dermal melanocytic nevi who developed a polypoid melanoma in one of them. After a carefully performed anamnesis, the mole that developed into melanoma was found to be localized in the dorsal area adjacent to the brassiere and underwent permanent and daily mechanical irradiation during the last 6-7 years. Around this mole there were 5 other moles with similar clinical and dermatoscopic morphology, which did not transform into melanomas and were not subjected to mechanical irritation. The patient had a dermatological examination 6 years ago and it was suggested that this lesion has to be surgically removed, which she declined. The patient was treated surgically and the lesion suspicious for cutaneous melanoma was removed in two stages according to the generally accepted AJCC/EJC recommendations. In parallel, 5 additional melanocytic nevi were removed, which histologically had features of dysplastic dermal melanocytic nevi but no signs of progression to melanoma. This article discusses the causes of nevus -associated melanomas and emphasizes the thesis of potential malignant transformation through mechanical irritation - in this case that of the brassiere. The moles localized in this area, although clinically and dermatoscopically inapparent, should be treated surgically. This painless, short-term manipulation has a preventive effect on the future development of cutaneous melanomas.

Standardized Computer-Assisted Analysis of 5-hmC Immunoreactivity in Dysplastic Nevi and Superficial Spreading Melanomas.

5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) is an important intermediate of DNA demethylation. Hypomethylation of DNA is frequent in cancer, resulting in deregulation of 5-hmC levels in melanoma. However, the interpretation of the intensity and distribution of 5-hmC immunoreactivity is not very standardized, which makes its interpretation difficult. In this study, 5-hmC-stained histological slides of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM) and dysplastic compound nevi (DN) were digitized and analyzed using the digital pathology and image platform QuPath. Receiver operating characteristic/area under the curve (ROCAUC) and t-tests were performed. A p-value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a ROCAUC score of >0.8 was considered a "good" result. In total, 92 5-hmC-stained specimens were analyzed, including 42 SSM (45.7%) and 50 DN (54.3%). The mean of 5-hmC-positive cells/mm2 for the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction and the entire lesion differed significantly between DN and SSM (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006, respectively) and showed a trend towards higher immunoreactivity in the dermal component (p = 0.069). The ROCAUC of 5-hmC-positive cells of the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction was 0.79, for the dermis 0.74, and for the entire lesion 0.76. These results show that the assessment of the epidermal with junctional expression of 5-hmC is slightly superior to dermal immunoreactivity in distinguishing between DN and SSM.

Diagnostic utility of combining PRAME and HMB-45 stains in primary melanocytic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pathologists face ongoing challenges distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic tumors. PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) has a demonstrated value distinguishing between these types of lesions. However, the sensitivity of single immunohistochemistry is variable. HMB-45 is another valuable marker, but on its own, has a limited ability in setting of primary melanocytic tumors. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a dual panel combining PRAME and HMB-45 in the assessment of primary melanocytic tumors. METHODS: 259 tumors, of which 141 were benign nevi, 31 dysplastic nevi (either low- or high grade dysplasia), and further 87 malignant melanomas, were retrieved from the department's archives and assessed by two experienced dermatopathologists. New sections were stained with PRAME and HMB-45, respectively. For PRAME, a nuclear, and for HMB-45, a cytoplasmic staining, was considered positive and scored as described in the literature on a scale from 0 to 4+. Only dermal component was assessed on HMB-45 stain. RESULTS: PRAME was diffusely expressed in only 1 benign nevus, with focal expression in further 28 compared to 22 diffusely and 103 focally HMB-45-positive benign nevi. 5 high-grade dysplastic nevi showed diffuse PRAME expression in epidermal component, with varying degree of positivity in adjacent dermal compartment, and further 8 dysplastic nevi showed only focal expression. HMB-45 was diffusely expressed in only 2, with focal expression in 23, and no apparent positivity in remaining 6 dysplastic nevi. In invasive melanoma group, PRAME stained >75 % cells in 64/87 tumors, however, 10/87 melanomas were completely negative. HMB-45 was captured diffusely in 49/87 melanomas, 32 showed patchy expression, and 6 tumors were blank negative. Diffuse 4+ PRAME positivity showed superior sensitivity and specificity of 73,6 % and 96,5 %, respectively, compared to HMB-45, 56,3 % and 86,0 %, respectively. No nevi showed double 4+ positivity, however, the sensitivity for double positivity was only 49,4 %. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the superiority of PRAME over HMB-45 in the differential diagnosis of melanocytic tumors. However, combined staining can significantly increase specificity, rendering a benign diagnosis more unlikely in a double 4+ diffuse positivity setting.

Refining the application of PRAME-a useful marker in high CSD and acral melanoma subtypes.

Pathologic discordance affecting patient management may approach 20% in melanocytic cases following specialist review. The diagnostic utility of PRAME has been highlighted in several studies but interpretative challenges exist including its use in severely dysplastic compound nevi showing progression to melanoma in situ, nevoid melanoma, and coexisting nevi with melanoma. We examine the PRAME status of a broad spectrum of melanocytic lesions including challenging, dysplastic nevi with severe atypia from a large Irish patient cohort. Retrospective review of the dermatopathology database was conducted to evaluate the PRAME staining characteristics of two hundred and twenty-one melanocytic lesions using a commercially available PRAME antibody (EPR20330). The proportion of nuclear labeling and intensity of staining was recorded. The sensitivity and specificity of PRAME for in situ and malignant melanocytic lesions was 77% and 100%, respectively. Virtually all of our melanoma in situ from high-cumulative sun damaged (CSD) skin (22/23) and all acral lentiginous melanoma (5/5) were PRAME positive while 80% (8/10) of our lentigo maligna melanoma showed diffuse expression. None of our benign subgroup showed diffuse immunoexpression (0/82), including thirty-seven moderate or severely dysplastic nevi. In all cases of melanoma in situ arising in association with a dysplastic compound nevus (0/10), no immunoexpression was observed in the nevic component while in five cases of melanoma in situ with coexistent, intradermal nevus immunostaining was confined to the in situ component. A total of 100% (2/2) of desmoplastic melanomas and 50% (4/8) of nodular melanomas were PRAME positive. PRAME is a sensitive and highly specific immunostain in the diagnosis of in situ and invasive melanoma and we emphasize its application in the evaluation of high CSD and acral melanoma subtypes as well as in challenging threshold cases.

Survey on the Management of Dysplastic Nevus by Dermatologists in the Center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). / Encuesta sobre el manejo del nevus displásico por los dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no clinical guidelines on the management of dysplastic nevus (DN). The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of dermatologists in the center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) who would manage a histologically confirmed DN with a watch-and-wait approach or with wider surgical margins and to investigate whether their attitudes would vary depending on whether or not the patient had a personal and/or family history of melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected data from an anonymous survey sent to 738 dermatologists between June 15 and July 31, 2022. The independent variables were degree of dysplasia (low vs. high), margin status (positive vs. negative), and a personal or family history of melanoma (yes vs. no in both cases). The dependent variables were attitude towards management (watch-and-wait vs. re-excision with a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm or re-excision with a surgical margin of 5 to 10mm). RESULTS: We obtained 86 responses to the questionnaire. When pathology indicated a low-grade DN, 60.5% of dermatologists stated they would obtain a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm if the first margins were positive, and 97.7% would watch and wait if the report described negative margins. For high-grade DNs, 1.2% of dermatologists would watch and wait to manage DN with positive margins; 68.8% would use this approach for negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma had no influence on most of the dermatologists' attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Management strategies for DN among dermatologists from the center-Spain section of the AEDV varied, particularly when faced with low-grade DN with positive margins and high-grade DN with negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma did not influence clinical attitudes in most cases.

NEIGHBOURING MELANOMAS AND DYSPLASTIC NEVUS DEVELOPING SIMULTANEOUSLY AFTER CANDESARTAN INTAKE: NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION/ AVAILABILITY AS MAIN CAUSE FOR SKIN CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION.

Although the problem with nitrosamines and their connection to the generation of skin cancer deepens, it is also thoroughly, carefully, and obligingly neglected. The probable reason for this is in all likelihood the lack of a solution or way out of this situation at the regulatory level. There is almost no sartan (on the European market/certain countries) after taking which the development of single or multiple melanomas, as well as melanomas in combination with single/multiple keratinocyte tumors, is not observed. But also, skin tumors (again melanomas) in combination with up to two other tumors - simultaneously or subsequently. These cases are immediately reported to the regional regulatory units, but unfortunately to no avail. Valsartan, irbesartan, olmesartan, and now candesartan is the main "suspect medications" for the development of melanomas, regardless of the dilemma: 1) whether the available nitrosamine remains responsible (for melanoma) as a mono/poly-contaminant (as availability or at a certain dose) or 2) is the generic substance itself also partly to blame? The literature data on the subject are contradictory, but does not exclude the involvement of any of these units in the generation and progression of melanomas. The lack of official results of possible checks for the presence (of nitrosamines) after the side effect reports were submitted to regulatory bodies further deepened the doubts of the clinicians, supporting the possible pathogenetic role of not only nitrosamines as a key link regarding the development of skin cancer. In practice, permissive regimes for the availability of carcinogens/mutagens in minimum permissible amounts, have been established? It is unclear whether this should be interpreted as a powerlessness of the regulatory authorities in the face of powerful pharmaceutical concerns? Or is it rather a lull before the start of general regulatory changes and a forthcoming "shifting of the layers"? The paradox also arises from the fact that many contaminated batches are quickly, quietly withdrawn from the market, despite being declared harmless or dangerous only for animals. We report on a patient who developed thin melanoma and neighbouring melanoma in situ after receiving candesartan, treated via one step melanoma surgery within one surgical session with a complete surgical margin of 2 cm. In parallel with the mentioned, a dysplastic nevus was observed clinically and confirmed dermatoscopically in the area of left scapula, for which surgical treatment is planned. Based on the currently available literature data, a thorough analysis of the role of nitrosamines, as a possible powerful pathogenetic factor for the occurrence and progression of melanomas, was made. The possible role of the generic substance as a cofactor in the carcinogenesis of skin cancer is also discussed.

Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Oncogenic Tissue Remodeling during Progression from Common Nevi to Early Melanoma.

Early detection and treatment of melanoma, the most aggressive skin cancer, improves the median 5-year survival rate of patients from 25% to 99%. Melanoma development involves a stepwise process during which genetic changes drive histologic alterations within nevi and surrounding tissue. Herein, a comprehensive analysis of publicly available gene expression data sets of melanoma, common or congenital nevi (CN), and dysplastic nevi (DN), assessed molecular and genetic pathways leading to early melanoma. The results demonstrate several pathways reflective of ongoing local structural tissue remodeling activity likely involved during the transition from benign to early-stage melanoma. These processes include the gene expression of cancer-associated fibroblasts, collagens, extracellular matrix, and integrins, which assist early melanoma development and the immune surveillance that plays a substantial role at this early stage. Furthermore, genes up-regulated in DN were also overexpressed in melanoma tissue, supporting the notion that DN may serve as a transitional phase toward oncogenesis. CN collected from healthy individuals exhibited different gene signatures compared with histologically benign nevi tissue located adjacent to melanoma (adjacent nevi). Finally, the expression profile of microdissected adjacent nevi tissue was more similar to melanoma compared with CN, revealing the melanoma influence on this annexed tissue.

Comparing Follicular Extension Between Low-Grade and High-Grade Dysplastic Nevi.

ABSTRACT: Dysplastic nevi are an important subset of melanocytic nevi with atypical clinical, histopathologic, as well as genomic features compared with common acquired nevi. Dysplastic nevi are characterized histologically by both cytologic atypia and architectural disorder. The established criteria for cytologic atypia used to distinguish between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi are often subjective, although there is a dearth of more objective, reproducible features of architectural disorder (eg, pagetoid scatter) that have been validated to differentiate between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi. In this study, we sought to determine whether the presence and degree of follicular extension differ between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi. We retrospectively examined the histopathologic features of 90 dysplastic nevi: 60 cases of low-grade dysplastic nevi (average age of 47.2 ± 18.1 years; 62.7% female) and 30 cases of high-grade dysplastic nevi (average age of 47.4 ± 19.8 years; 60.0% female). After examination, 50% of the cases of dysplastic nevi (n = 45) had hair follicles within the lesion, for which the presence and degree of follicular extension was then determined. Low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi do not differ significantly regarding the presence of follicular extension, average depth of follicular extension, and confluence of nevus cells along the follicular epithelium. Both low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi in our study demonstrated follicular extension that was superficial, that is, above the level of isthmus of hair follicles (insertion of sebaceous gland into hair follicle). Future studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.

Standardized Computer-Assisted Analysis of PRAME Immunoreactivity in Dysplastic Nevi and Superficial Spreading Melanomas.

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a cancer testis antigen that is frequently expressed in melanoma compared to benign melanocytic proliferations and nevi. However, the interpretation of the intensity and distribution of PRAME immunostaining is not standardized a lot, which makes interpretation difficult. PRAME-stained histological slides of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM) and dysplastic nevi (DN) were digitized and analyzed using the digital pathology and image platform QuPath. t-tests and ROC AUCs were performed with SPSS. A p-value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a ROC AUC score of >0.8 was considered a good result. A cut-off score was defined in an evaluation cohort and subsequently analyzed in an independent validation cohort. In total, 81 PRAME-stained specimens were included. The evaluation cohort included 32 (50%) SSM and 32 (50%) DN, and the mean of PRAME-positive cells/mm2 for the entire lesion was 455.3 (SD 428.2) in SSM and 60.5 (SD 130.1; p < 0.001) in DN. The ROC AUC of PRAME-positive cells of the entire lesion was 0.866, and in the epidermis it was 0.901. The defined cut-off score to distinguish between DN and SSM was 97.67 cells/mm2. In the validation cohort, 16 out of 17 cases (94.1%) were correctly classified by the cut-off score. The computer-aided assessment of PRAME immunostaining is a useful tool in dermatopathology to distinguish between DN and SSM. Lesions with a moderate expression and indifferent morphologic features will remain a challenge for dermatopathologists.

MULTIPLE BCCS AND DYSPLASTIC NEVI AFTER ACE INHIBITORS (ENALAPRIL/PERINDOPRIL): THE ROLE OF NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION/AVAILABILITY AS SUBSTANTIAL SKIN CANCER TRIGGERING FACTOR.

Nitrosamines as contaminants in a wide variety of drugs are also found to be one of the most likely causes of skin cancer. A detailed analysis of this contamination could in the near future solve to a large extent the puzzle of carcinogenesis concerning the keratinocytic forms of cancer and melanoma. But also, probably cancer in general. Over 80% of skin cancer is due to acquired mutations, and nitrosamines, which are contained as contamination in certain batches of the most commonly distributed drugs worldwide (such as sartans, ACE inhibitors, ranitidine, metformin, hydrochlorothiazide, rifampicin, and a number of others.) are considered among the most powerful external mutagens, carcinogens. Carcinogens that until 2021 were not supposed to be present in medicines and carcinogens for which it was subsequently decided to create a regulatory regime for permissible availability. Regardless of whether these contaminants are applied within the so-called daily acceptable intake dose or many times above it, the problem with the availability of nitrosamines continues to be present. It is also caused by the lack of reflection of the concentration of the corresponding nitrosamine in a certain drug. Thus, it is impossible to calculate the ˝permissible daily intake of the total number of mutagens and their concentration based on polymedication˝. In practice, drug manufacturers distribute nitrosamines in parallel with drugs, although they are not listed as a component of the product but are identified and allowed as contamination or substances with permissible availability by the EMA/FDA. From another point of view, the fact that is not commented on is also of interest, namely that not all batches are affected by this contamination. This suggests that the contamination may have been controlled, since in a manufacturing error the contamination should be widespread. The registration of the potential contamination of a heterogeneous type of medicinal products on the European market to the executive agencies for drug control in certain geographical areas has remained for years without any answer and opens a number of questions. The problem with ACE inhibitors is similar to that with sartans, hydrochlorothiazide, metformin, and ranitidine. The ˝special impression˝ of the clinicians is determined by the fact that the patterns of manifestation of the skin tumors during the administration of a heterogeneous class of medications are similar to completely identical. From this it could be concluded that the unifying factor between the pattern of occurrence could not be based on the action of the main substance of each drug class, since it remains to be radically different. The unifying link remains the sole and only contamination or the permissible already availability of a new ingredient known as nitrosamines. We present cases of multiple basal cell carcinomas and dysplastic nevi following enalapril and perindopril administration. The role of potential contamination of ACE inhibitors with nitrosamines for the development of skin cancer is discussed.