Consistency of convolutional neural networks in dermoscopic melanoma recognition: A prospective real-world study about the pitfalls of augmented intelligence.

BACKGROUND: Deep-learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have outperformed even experienced dermatologists in dermoscopic melanoma detection under controlled conditions. It remains unexplored how real-world dermoscopic image transformations affect CNN robustness. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the consistency of melanoma risk assessment by two commercially available CNNs to help formulate recommendations for current clinical use. METHODS: A comparative cohort study was conducted from January to July 2022 at the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel. Five dermoscopic images of 116 different lesions on the torso of 66 patients were captured consecutively by the same operator without deliberate rotation. Classification was performed by two CNNs (CNN-1/CNN-2). Lesions were divided into four subgroups based on their initial risk scoring and clinical dignity assessment. Reliability was assessed by variation and intraclass correlation coefficients. Excisions were performed for melanoma suspicion or two consecutively elevated CNN risk scores, and benign lesions were confirmed by expert consensus (n = 3). RESULTS: 117 repeated image series of 116 melanocytic lesions (2 melanomas, 16 dysplastic naevi, 29 naevi, 1 solar lentigo, 1 suspicious and 67 benign) were classified. CNN-1 demonstrated superior measurement repeatability for clinically benign lesions with an initial malignant risk score (mean variation coefficient (mvc): CNN-1: 49.5(±34.3)%; CNN-2: 71.4(±22.5)%; p = 0.03), while CNN-2 outperformed for clinically benign lesions with benign scoring (mvc: CNN-1: 49.7(±22.7)%; CNN-2: 23.8(±29.3)%; p = 0.002). Both systems exhibited lowest score consistency for lesions with an initial malignant risk score and benign assessment. In this context, averaging three initial risk scores achieved highest sensitivity of dignity assessment (CNN-1: 94%; CNN-2: 89%). Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated 'moderate'-to-'good' reliability for both systems (CNN-1: 0.80, 95% CI:0.71-0.87, p < 0.001; CNN-2: 0.67, 95% CI:0.55-0.77, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Potential user-induced image changes can significantly influence CNN classification. For clinical application, we recommend using the average of three initial risk scores. Furthermore, we advocate for CNN robustness optimization by cross-validation with repeated image sets. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04605822).

Pitfalls of PRAME Immunohistochemistry in a Large Series of Melanocytic and Nonmelanocytic Lesions With Literature Review.

ABSTRACT: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry is currently used to facilitate distinction of benign and malignant melanocytic proliferations. We hypothesized that evaluation of 1 institution's experience with PRAME labeling in a large number of consecutive cases might elucidate additional strengths and potential pitfalls and reveal base rates of positivity versus negativity in 1 academic practice. Pathology reports for all specimens on which PRAME labeling was performed at our institution between January 2021 and May 2022 were retrieved from our database. Eighty percent of conventional malignant melanomas were labeled diffusely positive with PRAME; there were no significant differences in mean age, sex, site, Breslow depth, ulceration status, or American Joint Committee on Cancer pathological tumor stage when comparing diffusely PRAME-positive malignant melanomas with those that lack diffuse labeling. Although no banal melanocytic nevi were labeled with PRAME, 13% of dysplastic nevi were diffusely PRAME positive, with junctional proliferations, severe atypia, male gender, and older age being associated with PRAME positivity. As some but not all ambiguous melanocytic lesions in which malignancy could not be excluded based on morphology alone were diffusely PRAME positive, PRAME's accuracy in predicting malignancy remains unclear to the authors; further study is needed to assess the precision to which PRAME immunohistochemistry can separate benign borderline lesions from their malignant counterparts. Among nonmelanocytic lesions, some poorly differentiated tumors, including atypical fibroxanthomas, can be PRAME positive. This series underscores the importance of clinicopathologic correlation and shows that diffuse PRAME positivity is highest in conventional malignant melanomas (∼80%, or 8 of 10 lesions), is seen in about half of challenging borderline lesions at our institution, and can be observed in lesions diagnosed as dysplastic nevi by our group (∼10% or 1 in 10 lesions), as well as in rare poorly differentiated malignancies.

"THE DANGEROUS BRASSIERE" AND THE NEVUS ASSOCIATED POLYPOID MELANOMA: CONNECTION SEEMS PLAUSIBLE?

The development of cutaneous melanoma of the skin based on dysplastic nevus is not uncommon. The causes of the progression of nevi to melanomas are numerous and not well understood at present. Certain genetic and epigenetic factors have a major influence on this evolution. We describe a 46-year-old female patient with multiple dermal melanocytic nevi who developed a polypoid melanoma in one of them. After a carefully performed anamnesis, the mole that developed into melanoma was found to be localized in the dorsal area adjacent to the brassiere and underwent permanent and daily mechanical irradiation during the last 6-7 years. Around this mole there were 5 other moles with similar clinical and dermatoscopic morphology, which did not transform into melanomas and were not subjected to mechanical irritation. The patient had a dermatological examination 6 years ago and it was suggested that this lesion has to be surgically removed, which she declined. The patient was treated surgically and the lesion suspicious for cutaneous melanoma was removed in two stages according to the generally accepted AJCC/EJC recommendations. In parallel, 5 additional melanocytic nevi were removed, which histologically had features of dysplastic dermal melanocytic nevi but no signs of progression to melanoma. This article discusses the causes of nevus -associated melanomas and emphasizes the thesis of potential malignant transformation through mechanical irritation - in this case that of the brassiere. The moles localized in this area, although clinically and dermatoscopically inapparent, should be treated surgically. This painless, short-term manipulation has a preventive effect on the future development of cutaneous melanomas.

Standardized Computer-Assisted Analysis of 5-hmC Immunoreactivity in Dysplastic Nevi and Superficial Spreading Melanomas.

5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) is an important intermediate of DNA demethylation. Hypomethylation of DNA is frequent in cancer, resulting in deregulation of 5-hmC levels in melanoma. However, the interpretation of the intensity and distribution of 5-hmC immunoreactivity is not very standardized, which makes its interpretation difficult. In this study, 5-hmC-stained histological slides of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM) and dysplastic compound nevi (DN) were digitized and analyzed using the digital pathology and image platform QuPath. Receiver operating characteristic/area under the curve (ROCAUC) and t-tests were performed. A p-value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a ROCAUC score of >0.8 was considered a "good" result. In total, 92 5-hmC-stained specimens were analyzed, including 42 SSM (45.7%) and 50 DN (54.3%). The mean of 5-hmC-positive cells/mm2 for the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction and the entire lesion differed significantly between DN and SSM (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006, respectively) and showed a trend towards higher immunoreactivity in the dermal component (p = 0.069). The ROCAUC of 5-hmC-positive cells of the epidermis and dermo-epidermal junction was 0.79, for the dermis 0.74, and for the entire lesion 0.76. These results show that the assessment of the epidermal with junctional expression of 5-hmC is slightly superior to dermal immunoreactivity in distinguishing between DN and SSM.

Diagnostic utility of combining PRAME and HMB-45 stains in primary melanocytic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pathologists face ongoing challenges distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic tumors. PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) has a demonstrated value distinguishing between these types of lesions. However, the sensitivity of single immunohistochemistry is variable. HMB-45 is another valuable marker, but on its own, has a limited ability in setting of primary melanocytic tumors. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a dual panel combining PRAME and HMB-45 in the assessment of primary melanocytic tumors. METHODS: 259 tumors, of which 141 were benign nevi, 31 dysplastic nevi (either low- or high grade dysplasia), and further 87 malignant melanomas, were retrieved from the department's archives and assessed by two experienced dermatopathologists. New sections were stained with PRAME and HMB-45, respectively. For PRAME, a nuclear, and for HMB-45, a cytoplasmic staining, was considered positive and scored as described in the literature on a scale from 0 to 4+. Only dermal component was assessed on HMB-45 stain. RESULTS: PRAME was diffusely expressed in only 1 benign nevus, with focal expression in further 28 compared to 22 diffusely and 103 focally HMB-45-positive benign nevi. 5 high-grade dysplastic nevi showed diffuse PRAME expression in epidermal component, with varying degree of positivity in adjacent dermal compartment, and further 8 dysplastic nevi showed only focal expression. HMB-45 was diffusely expressed in only 2, with focal expression in 23, and no apparent positivity in remaining 6 dysplastic nevi. In invasive melanoma group, PRAME stained >75 % cells in 64/87 tumors, however, 10/87 melanomas were completely negative. HMB-45 was captured diffusely in 49/87 melanomas, 32 showed patchy expression, and 6 tumors were blank negative. Diffuse 4+ PRAME positivity showed superior sensitivity and specificity of 73,6 % and 96,5 %, respectively, compared to HMB-45, 56,3 % and 86,0 %, respectively. No nevi showed double 4+ positivity, however, the sensitivity for double positivity was only 49,4 %. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the superiority of PRAME over HMB-45 in the differential diagnosis of melanocytic tumors. However, combined staining can significantly increase specificity, rendering a benign diagnosis more unlikely in a double 4+ diffuse positivity setting.

Survey on the Management of Dysplastic Nevus by Dermatologists in the Center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). / Encuesta sobre el manejo del nevus displásico por los dermatólogos de la sección Centro de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no clinical guidelines on the management of dysplastic nevus (DN). The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of dermatologists in the center-Spain section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) who would manage a histologically confirmed DN with a watch-and-wait approach or with wider surgical margins and to investigate whether their attitudes would vary depending on whether or not the patient had a personal and/or family history of melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected data from an anonymous survey sent to 738 dermatologists between June 15 and July 31, 2022. The independent variables were degree of dysplasia (low vs. high), margin status (positive vs. negative), and a personal or family history of melanoma (yes vs. no in both cases). The dependent variables were attitude towards management (watch-and-wait vs. re-excision with a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm or re-excision with a surgical margin of 5 to 10mm). RESULTS: We obtained 86 responses to the questionnaire. When pathology indicated a low-grade DN, 60.5% of dermatologists stated they would obtain a surgical margin of 1 to 4mm if the first margins were positive, and 97.7% would watch and wait if the report described negative margins. For high-grade DNs, 1.2% of dermatologists would watch and wait to manage DN with positive margins; 68.8% would use this approach for negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma had no influence on most of the dermatologists' attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Management strategies for DN among dermatologists from the center-Spain section of the AEDV varied, particularly when faced with low-grade DN with positive margins and high-grade DN with negative margins. A family or personal history of melanoma did not influence clinical attitudes in most cases.

NEIGHBOURING MELANOMAS AND DYSPLASTIC NEVUS DEVELOPING SIMULTANEOUSLY AFTER CANDESARTAN INTAKE: NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION/ AVAILABILITY AS MAIN CAUSE FOR SKIN CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION.

Although the problem with nitrosamines and their connection to the generation of skin cancer deepens, it is also thoroughly, carefully, and obligingly neglected. The probable reason for this is in all likelihood the lack of a solution or way out of this situation at the regulatory level. There is almost no sartan (on the European market/certain countries) after taking which the development of single or multiple melanomas, as well as melanomas in combination with single/multiple keratinocyte tumors, is not observed. But also, skin tumors (again melanomas) in combination with up to two other tumors - simultaneously or subsequently. These cases are immediately reported to the regional regulatory units, but unfortunately to no avail. Valsartan, irbesartan, olmesartan, and now candesartan is the main "suspect medications" for the development of melanomas, regardless of the dilemma: 1) whether the available nitrosamine remains responsible (for melanoma) as a mono/poly-contaminant (as availability or at a certain dose) or 2) is the generic substance itself also partly to blame? The literature data on the subject are contradictory, but does not exclude the involvement of any of these units in the generation and progression of melanomas. The lack of official results of possible checks for the presence (of nitrosamines) after the side effect reports were submitted to regulatory bodies further deepened the doubts of the clinicians, supporting the possible pathogenetic role of not only nitrosamines as a key link regarding the development of skin cancer. In practice, permissive regimes for the availability of carcinogens/mutagens in minimum permissible amounts, have been established? It is unclear whether this should be interpreted as a powerlessness of the regulatory authorities in the face of powerful pharmaceutical concerns? Or is it rather a lull before the start of general regulatory changes and a forthcoming "shifting of the layers"? The paradox also arises from the fact that many contaminated batches are quickly, quietly withdrawn from the market, despite being declared harmless or dangerous only for animals. We report on a patient who developed thin melanoma and neighbouring melanoma in situ after receiving candesartan, treated via one step melanoma surgery within one surgical session with a complete surgical margin of 2 cm. In parallel with the mentioned, a dysplastic nevus was observed clinically and confirmed dermatoscopically in the area of left scapula, for which surgical treatment is planned. Based on the currently available literature data, a thorough analysis of the role of nitrosamines, as a possible powerful pathogenetic factor for the occurrence and progression of melanomas, was made. The possible role of the generic substance as a cofactor in the carcinogenesis of skin cancer is also discussed.

Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Oncogenic Tissue Remodeling during Progression from Common Nevi to Early Melanoma.

Early detection and treatment of melanoma, the most aggressive skin cancer, improves the median 5-year survival rate of patients from 25% to 99%. Melanoma development involves a stepwise process during which genetic changes drive histologic alterations within nevi and surrounding tissue. Herein, a comprehensive analysis of publicly available gene expression data sets of melanoma, common or congenital nevi (CN), and dysplastic nevi (DN), assessed molecular and genetic pathways leading to early melanoma. The results demonstrate several pathways reflective of ongoing local structural tissue remodeling activity likely involved during the transition from benign to early-stage melanoma. These processes include the gene expression of cancer-associated fibroblasts, collagens, extracellular matrix, and integrins, which assist early melanoma development and the immune surveillance that plays a substantial role at this early stage. Furthermore, genes up-regulated in DN were also overexpressed in melanoma tissue, supporting the notion that DN may serve as a transitional phase toward oncogenesis. CN collected from healthy individuals exhibited different gene signatures compared with histologically benign nevi tissue located adjacent to melanoma (adjacent nevi). Finally, the expression profile of microdissected adjacent nevi tissue was more similar to melanoma compared with CN, revealing the melanoma influence on this annexed tissue.

Comparing Follicular Extension Between Low-Grade and High-Grade Dysplastic Nevi.

ABSTRACT: Dysplastic nevi are an important subset of melanocytic nevi with atypical clinical, histopathologic, as well as genomic features compared with common acquired nevi. Dysplastic nevi are characterized histologically by both cytologic atypia and architectural disorder. The established criteria for cytologic atypia used to distinguish between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi are often subjective, although there is a dearth of more objective, reproducible features of architectural disorder (eg, pagetoid scatter) that have been validated to differentiate between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi. In this study, we sought to determine whether the presence and degree of follicular extension differ between low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi. We retrospectively examined the histopathologic features of 90 dysplastic nevi: 60 cases of low-grade dysplastic nevi (average age of 47.2 ± 18.1 years; 62.7% female) and 30 cases of high-grade dysplastic nevi (average age of 47.4 ± 19.8 years; 60.0% female). After examination, 50% of the cases of dysplastic nevi (n = 45) had hair follicles within the lesion, for which the presence and degree of follicular extension was then determined. Low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi do not differ significantly regarding the presence of follicular extension, average depth of follicular extension, and confluence of nevus cells along the follicular epithelium. Both low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nevi in our study demonstrated follicular extension that was superficial, that is, above the level of isthmus of hair follicles (insertion of sebaceous gland into hair follicle). Future studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.

Standardized Computer-Assisted Analysis of PRAME Immunoreactivity in Dysplastic Nevi and Superficial Spreading Melanomas.

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a cancer testis antigen that is frequently expressed in melanoma compared to benign melanocytic proliferations and nevi. However, the interpretation of the intensity and distribution of PRAME immunostaining is not standardized a lot, which makes interpretation difficult. PRAME-stained histological slides of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM) and dysplastic nevi (DN) were digitized and analyzed using the digital pathology and image platform QuPath. t-tests and ROC AUCs were performed with SPSS. A p-value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a ROC AUC score of >0.8 was considered a good result. A cut-off score was defined in an evaluation cohort and subsequently analyzed in an independent validation cohort. In total, 81 PRAME-stained specimens were included. The evaluation cohort included 32 (50%) SSM and 32 (50%) DN, and the mean of PRAME-positive cells/mm2 for the entire lesion was 455.3 (SD 428.2) in SSM and 60.5 (SD 130.1; p < 0.001) in DN. The ROC AUC of PRAME-positive cells of the entire lesion was 0.866, and in the epidermis it was 0.901. The defined cut-off score to distinguish between DN and SSM was 97.67 cells/mm2. In the validation cohort, 16 out of 17 cases (94.1%) were correctly classified by the cut-off score. The computer-aided assessment of PRAME immunostaining is a useful tool in dermatopathology to distinguish between DN and SSM. Lesions with a moderate expression and indifferent morphologic features will remain a challenge for dermatopathologists.

TERT Promoter Mutational Analysis as an Ancillary Diagnostic Tool for Diagnostically Challenging Melanocytic Neoplasms.

ABSTRACT: Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations (TPMs) have been shown to be common in melanoma and uncommon in benign nevi. To assess the use of TPMs as an ancillary diagnostic tool, we report the concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis in clinical cases with distinct differential diagnostic scenarios: dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, atypical Spitz nevus versus melanoma, atypical deep penetrating nevus (DPN) versus melanoma, and atypical blue nevus versus malignant blue nevus. In a control cohort, we found a positive TPM in 51/70 (73%) of the total melanomas with the highest frequency in vertical growth phase melanoma cases. Conversely, only 2/35 (6%) dysplastic nevi in our control cases were TPM-positive and b were severely atypical dysplastic nevi. Our clinical cohort of 257 cases had a positive TPM in 24% of cases diagnosed as melanoma and in 1% of cases with a benign diagnosis. The overall concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis was 86%. The TPM status had the greatest concordance (95%) with the final diagnosis in the atypical DPN versus melanoma group, with the rest of the groups ranging between 50% and 88%. Overall, our results suggest that TPMs are most useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical DPN versus melanoma. It also has some value in the differential diagnosis of atypical Spitz tumor versus melanoma and dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, whereas in our cohort, it did not contribute meaningfully to differentiating malignant blue nevus and atypical blue nevus.

Biology and genetics of acquired and congenital melanocytic naevi.

Acquired and congenital melanocytic naevi are common benign neoplasms. Understanding their biology and genetics will help clinicians and pathologists correctly diagnose melanocytic tumours, and generate insights into naevus aetiology and melanomagenesis. Genomic data from published studies analysing acquired and congenital melanocytic naevi, including oncogenic driver mutations, common melanoma associated mutations, copy number aberrations, somatic mutation signature patterns, methylation profile, and single nucleotide polymorphisms, were reviewed. Correlation of genomic changes to dermoscopic features, particular anatomic sites and total body naevus counts, was also performed. This review also highlights current scientific theories and evidence concerning naevi growth arrest. Acquired and congenital melanocytic naevi show simple genomes, typically characterised by mutually exclusive single oncogenic driver mutations in either BRAF or NRAS genes. Genomic differences exist between acquired and congenital naevi, common and dysplastic naevi, and by dermoscopic features. Acquired naevi show a higher rate of BRAF hotspot mutations and a lower rate of NRAS hotspot mutations compared to congenital naevi. Dysplastic naevi show upregulation of follicular keratinocyte-related genes compared to common naevi. Anatomical locations and DNA signatures of naevi implicates ultraviolet radiation and non-ultraviolet radiation pathways in naevogenesis. DNA driver point mutations in acquired and congenital melanocytic naevi have been well characterised. Future research is required to better understand transcriptional and epigenetic changes in naevi, as well as those regulating naevus growth arrest and cell environment signalling.

Dysplastic nevus part II: Dysplastic nevi: Molecular/genetic profiles and management.

Dermatologists frequently see patients with clinically atypical nevi and dermatopathologists interpret histologically dysplastic nevi on a near-daily basis, but there is great variability in the definition and management of such lesions. This part of the CME review focuses on information published since the previous comprehensive review (2012), with emphasis on molecular and genetic attributes of histologically dysplastic nevi and clinical management.

Dysplastic nevus part I: Historical perspective, classification, and epidemiology.

Since the late 1970s, the diagnosis and management of dysplastic nevi have been areas fraught with controversy in the fields of dermatology and dermatopathology. Diagnostic uncertainty and lack of standardized nomenclature continue to propagate confusion among clinicians, dermatopathologists, and patients. In part I of this CME review article, we summarize the historical context that gave rise to the debate surrounding dysplastic nevi and review key features for diagnosis, classification, and management, as well as epidemiology. We discuss essentials of clinical criteria, dermoscopic features, histopathologic features, and the diagnostic utility of total body photography and reflectance confocal microscopy in evaluating dysplastic nevi, with emphasis on information available since the last comprehensive review a decade ago.

Histopathologic reassessment of melanoma and other melanocytic skin lesions excised in 2009 and 2018-2019. / Histopatologisk revurdering av melanom og andre melanocytære hudlesjoner eksidert i 2009 og 2018­19.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological assessment of melanoma and other melanocytic skin lesions can be difficult and can vary between pathologists. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Histopathological slides of 196 melanocytic skin lesions from 2009 and 2018-2019 were obtained from the archive of the Department of Pathology at Oslo University Hospital and classified into six diagnostic categories: 1) benign nevus, 2) irregular/dysplastic nevus, i.e. dysplastic nevus with moderate atypia, 3) nevus with severe atypia, i.e. dysplastic nevus with severe atypia, 4) melanoma in situ, 5) superficial spreading or lentiginous melanoma and 6) nodular melanoma. The slides were then examined independently and blindly by three experienced pathologists and categorised in the same way. Interobserver agreement was assessed with Cohen's kappa, and agreement with the original diagnosis was assessed by the proportion of assessments in the same diagnostic category. RESULTS: The kappa values for the assessments from the three pathologists ranged from 0.45 to 0.50. The proportion of reassessments in agreement with the original diagnostic category was 85.7 % (95 % CI 75.7 to 92.1), 29.2 % (19.9 to 40.5), 27.8 % (20.9 to 36.0), 78.3 % (70.4 to 84.5), 81.2 % (73.7 to 86.9) and 93.3 % (82.1 to 97.7), respectively, i.e. highest for nodular melanoma. The proportion of reassessments in which the diagnosis was more serious or less serious than the original diagnosis was higher and lower, respectively, for slides from 2009 than for slides from 2018-2019. INTERPRETATION: The differences between the pathologists' assessments and deviations from the original diagnoses can be explained by poorly reproducible diagnostic criteria, diagnostic entities with overlapping morphology and increasing awareness of early signs of malignancy. Some evolution in diagnostic practice cannot be ruled out.

Dysplastic melanocytic nevus: Are molecular findings the key to the diagnosis?

The primary differential diagnosis of melanoma is dysplastic nevus. Until now, the final diagnosis is based on histological findings. With modern techniques, pathologists receive very early melanocytic lesions, which do not fit all malignant criteria. In those cases, even the concurrence between specialists and intraobserver agreement is not good. A molecular test could be developed to improve the accuracy of melanocytic lesions diagnosis and help in challenging lesions. The objective of this study is to provide a literary review looking for molecular markers that characterize dysplastic nevi and could help surgical pathologists differentiate them from melanoma. Articles from PubMed presenting case series of dysplastic nevi and melanoma genomic analyses were considered. The search was conducted in PubMed looking for papers written in English, published in the ten years preceding April 2020. This review confirmed the absence of a pathognomonic molecular marker of dysplastic nevi. This is a heterogeneous group of lesions with an uncertain risk to become a melanoma. The molecular heterogeneity of dysplastic nevi, the variation of histological diagnostic criteria among services, and the diverse molecular techniques applied are challenging features that might hamper definitive diagnoses. However, currently, there appears to be limited value for molecular testing in the diagnosis of dysplastic nevi.

Dysplastic nevi and melanoma: microRNAs tell a divergent story.

BACKGROUND: dysplastic nevi (DN) share some clinical and histological features with melanoma and have been considered intermediate lesions toward malignant transformation. However, scientific evidence of DN representing melanoma precursors is still incomplete, and many observations pointed toward their being a distinct biological entity. The current definition of DN is also confusing and the practical consequence of this uncertainty is the excessive excision of DN with severe atypia. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small RNAs that regulate gene expression and whose global expression can classify normal and pathological tissues. OBJECTIVES: given these considerations, we decided to perform a small RNA profiling study in a group of DN and invasive melanomas obtained from the same patient, to assess tumor evolution according to the global microRNA expression. METHODS: we performed a small-RNA sequencing of 6 DN, 2 congenital nevi and 4 cutaneous melanomas obtained from 4 subjects and evaluated the global miRNA expression correlation between samples. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: the hierarchical clustering and principal component analyses of global miRNA expression, independently grouped together DN and their matching congenital nevi and showed a divergence of DN miRNA profile from melanoma. Our study suggests that DN have a peculiar and different miRNA expression profile compared to melanomas developed in the same patient, thus supporting the hypothesis that DN are distinct biological entities and not melanoma precursors.

Dermatopathologist Perceptions of Overdiagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Lesions and Association With Diagnostic Behaviors.

Importance: Despite evidence of overdiagnosis of in situ and invasive melanoma, neither the perceptions of practicing dermatopathologists about overdiagnosis nor possible associations between perceptions of overdiagnosis and diagnostic practices have been studied. Objective: To examine practicing US dermatopathologists' perceptions of melanoma overdiagnosis as a public health issue, and to associate diagnostic behaviors of dermatopathologists with perceptions of melanoma overdiagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study included 115 board-certified and/or fellowship-trained dermatopathologists and their diagnostic interpretations on a set of 18 skin biopsy cases (5 slide sets comprising 90 melanocytic skin lesions). Participants interpreted cases remotely using their own microscopes. Survey invitations occurred during 2018 to 2019, with data collection completed 2021. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Agreement vs disagreement that overdiagnosis is a public health issue for atypical nevi, melanoma in situ, and invasive melanoma. Associations between perceptions regarding overdiagnosis and interpretive behavior on study cases. Results: Of 115 dermatopathologists, 68% (95% CI, 59%-76%) agreed that overdiagnosis is a public health issue for atypical nevi; 47% (95% CI, 38%-56%) for melanoma in situ; and 35% (95% CI, 26%-43%) for invasive melanoma. Dermatopathologists with more years in practice were significantly less likely to perceive that atypical nevi are overdiagnosed, eg, 46% of dermatopathologists with 20 or more years of experience agreed that atypical nevi are overdiagnosed compared with 93% of dermatopathologists with 1 to 4 years of experience. Compared with other dermatopathologists, those who agreed that all 3 conditions are overdiagnosed were slightly more likely to diagnose study cases as mild to moderately dysplastic nevi (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.97-1.64; P = .08), but the difference was not statistically significant. Dermatopathologists who agreed that invasive melanoma is overdiagnosed did not significantly differ in diagnosing invasive melanoma for study cases compared with those who disagreed (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.41; P = .44). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, about two-thirds of dermatopathologists thought that atypical nevi are overdiagnosed, half thought that melanoma in situ is overdiagnosed, and one-third thought that invasive melanoma is overdiagnosed. No statistically significant associations were found between perceptions about overdiagnosis and interpretive behavior when diagnosing skin biopsy cases.