Comprehensive Analysis of Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndrome and PNS-CARE Diagnostic Criteria in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS) diagnostic criteria were first proposed in 2004 and updated in 2021. The PNS-CARE score, derived from the updated criteria, is a composite model for assigning likelihood for patients with suspected PNS. In this study, we evaluated the utility and applicability of the 2021 PNS-CARE score and present our PNS cohort. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. We identified Mayo Clinic patients suspected to have PNS (1/2005-12/2020) and collected relevant information including demographics, PNS presentation, and clinical outcomes. Inclusion criteria were the following: (1) patients with a syndrome consistent with PNS and (2) patients with sufficient information available in charts. Exclusion criteria were the following: (1) evaluation only before 2005, (2) patients not evaluated by neurology, (3) presentation after immune checkpoint inhibitors, and (4) syndromes not included in 2021 criteria. All patients were evaluated for the 2021 and 2004 PNS criteria. RESULTS: We identified 484 patients suspected to have PNS at initial presentation, of whom 212 (44%) were considered to have PNS after completion of evaluation. Among these 212 patients, the most common autoantibodies were PCA1 (Yo)-IgG (17%), KLHL11-IgG (16%), and CRMP5-IgG (14%) and the most common phenotypes were rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome (29%), brainstem encephalitis (14%), and limbic encephalitis (8%). The 2021 PNS criteria definite/probable categorization (PNS-CARE score ≥ 6) had a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 100%, respectively, while the 2004 PNS criteria definite categorization had a sensitivity and specificity of 67% and 99%, respectively. We found 15 patients with a PNS-CARE score ≤5 who likely had PNS on our review. The most common presentation among these patients was KLHL11-IgG brainstem encephalitis (7/15, 47%) with likely burned-out testicular tumor. DISCUSSION: Our study validates the PNS-CARE score. A clearer understanding of typical PNS presentation and common underlying malignancies and autoantibodies can aid in earlier and more accurate diagnosis, which is crucial for downstream clinical decisions. Some patients with an intermediate-risk phenotype do not meet probable/definite criteria despite the presence of high-risk antibodies and/or underlying malignancy.

Paraneoplastic Neurologic Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the clinical presentations, neural antibody associations, and oncologic accompaniments of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes and neurologic autoimmunity in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer immunotherapy. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Neural antibody discovery has improved the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes. Neural antibodies also delineate the underlying disease pathophysiology and thus inform outcomes and treatments. Neural antibodies specific for extracellular proteins have pathogenic potential, whereas antibodies specific for intracellular targets are biomarkers of a cytotoxic T-cell immune response. A recent update in paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome criteria suggests high- and intermediate-risk phenotypes as well as neural antibodies to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes; a score was created based on this categorization. The introduction of ICI cancer immunotherapy has led to an increase in cancer-related neurologic autoimmunity with distinct clinical phenotypes. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes reflect an ongoing immunologic response to cancer mediated by effector T cells or antibodies. Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes can present with manifestations at any level of the neuraxis, and neural antibodies aid diagnosis, focus cancer screening, and inform prognosis and therapy. In patients with high clinical suspicion of a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome, cancer screening and treatment should be undertaken, regardless of the presence of a neural antibody. ICI therapy has led to immune-mediated neurologic complications. Recognition and treatment lead to improved outcomes.

Anti-Hu antibody associated paraneoplastic neurological syndrome in a child with ganglioneuroblastoma: A rare case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Paraneoplastic neurological syndrome with anti-Hu antibody (Hu-PNS) is a neurological disorder that occur in patients with malignancy. The syndrome has a wide range of presentations and can present before diagnosis of primary malignancy. Familiarity with these paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help early recognition and take appropriate regimens. PATIENTS CONCERNS: Diagnosis and treatment of Hu-PNS. DIAGNOSES: This is retrospective study that analyzed the clinical data of this case. Through retrospective analysis and targeted antibody screening, serum anti-Hu antibody was detected. Subsequent spinal imaging revealed a mass in the paraspinal region, which was confirmed as ganglioneuroblastoma by pathologic examination. INTERVENTIONS: The child was treated with a course of intravenous immunoglobulin and radical surgical operation without chemotherapy. OUTCOMES: The neurological symptoms were gradually improved and no signs indicate disease progression or tumor recurrence. LESSONS: Hu-PNS has rarely been reported in children with ganglioneuroblastomas. They can mimic non-neoplastic processes, making detection and diagnosis difficult. Serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid onconeural antibody can strongly indicate occult cancers. Early detection of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help take appropriate regimens and improve prognosis.

[Paraneoplastic Disorders of Peripheral Nervous System].

Paraneoplastic disorders of the peripheral nervous system are immune-mediated neurological syndromes associated with tumors. Several clinical phenotypes have been associated with these disorders. Sensory neuronopathy is the most well-known clinical phenotype, and is caused by neuronal cell injury to the dorsal root ganglia. Symptoms of the peripheral nervous system usually lead to the discovery of tumors. Antineuronal antibodies are occasionally identified in the serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid of these patients. The prevalence of small-cell lung cancer is notable in these patients. Early tumor resection, coupled with the initiation of immunotherapy, may prove effective in improving and stabilizing clinical symptoms.

Testicular Cancer and Paraneoplastic Encephalitis: A Review of the Current Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Paraneoplastic encephalitis (PE) represents a rare but significant complication in patients with testicular cancer (TC). Given the paucity of comprehensive literature on this topic, our review seeks to consolidate current knowledge and provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of PE in the context of TC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In adherence to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted from 1950 to April 2024 using PubMed. The search focused on articles where TC was identified as the primary etiology of PE. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's levels of evidence tool were employed for assessing study quality, and a thematic analysis was conducted to identify trends and patterns. RESULTS: Out of 91 articles identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 5 retrospective chart reviews, 3 case series, and 22 case reports. Findings indicate that PE symptoms can manifest at any stage of TC-before tumor detection, during treatment, or even years posttreatment. A notable observation was the frequent oversight of microscopic testicular tumors in ultrasound imaging, leading to diagnostic delays. The outcomes of PE in the context of TC were diverse, reflecting the heterogeneity of the studies included. CONCLUSION: PE, although rare, is a critical consideration in patients with TC presenting with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Early recognition and appropriate diagnostic workup, including consideration for microscopic neoplasms, are essential for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.

Clinical and serological insights into paraneoplastic brachial amyotrophic diplegia.

BACKGROUND: Brachial amyotrophic diplegia (BAD) is typically linked to a neurodegenerative etiology such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Clinical and serological characterizations of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes resembling BAD are limited. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with BAD-like presentations was conducted. Clinical/paraclinical features of paraneoplastic BAD and neurodegenerative BAD cases were compared. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2023, 13 cases of BAD were identified, of these 10 were neurodegenerative BAD (ALS variant), and 3 cases associated with paraneoplastic autoimmunity. An additional paraneoplastic BAD case diagnosed in 2005 was included. LUZP4-IgG was detected in all four paraneoplastic cases, with coexisting KLHL11-IgG in three cases and ANNA1 (anti-Hu)-IgG in one case. Out of the four paraneoplastic cases, two patients had seminoma, while the remaining two had limited cancer investigation. Three patients exhibited bi-brachial weakness as the initial symptom before the onset of brainstem symptoms or seizures. Compared to BAD patients with a neurodegenerative etiology, a higher proportion of paraneoplastic cases had ataxia (75% vs 0%, p = 0.011). Other clinical features only detected in the paraneoplastic BAD group were vertigo (n = 2), hearing loss (n = 2) and ophthalmoplegia (n = 2). Electrodiagnostic studies in these patients revealed cervical myotome involvement, supportive of motor neuronopathy. All paraneoplastic cases but none of the neurodegenerative BAD cases exhibited inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings (lymphocytic pleocytosis and/or supernumerary oligoclonal bands; p = 0.067). Despite the administration of immunotherapy and/or cancer treatment, none of the paraneoplastic patients reported clinical improvement. DISCUSSION: BAD or bi-brachial neurogenic weakness is a rare phenotypic presentation associated with paraneoplastic autoimmunity. Co-existing features of brainstem dysfunction or cerebellar ataxia should prompt further paraneoplastic evaluation. Common serological and cancer associations among these cases include LUZP4-IgG and KLHL11-IgG, along with testicular germ cell tumors, respectively.

Clinical Presentation, Management, and Diagnostic Performance of 2021 Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes in Childhood.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) are remote neurologic immune-related effects of tumors. The clinical characteristics of pediatric PNSs remain unclear. We retrospectively examined the clinical characteristics of cases of pediatric PNSs and assessed the performance of the 2021 diagnostic criteria in children. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in the Beijing Children's Hospital between June 2015 and June 2023 and fulfilling the description of definite by 2004 diagnostic criteria of PNSs were included. A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics was conducted, and the 2021 diagnostic criteria were applied to rediagnostic stratification. RESULTS: Among the 42 patients included, the most common neurologic syndrome was opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) (62%), followed by rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome (26%). Most tumors were neuroblastomas (88%), with few being ovarian teratomas (10%). Approximately 71% (30/42) of patients were classified as definite and 24% (10/42) as probable according to the 2021 criteria. All cases judged as probable exhibited rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia with neuroblastoma. For OMS, chemotherapy was administered based on the tumor's risk stage, accompanied by regular infusion of IV gamma globulin and oral steroids following tumor diagnosis. Twenty-one patients underwent regular follow-ups over 4.92 (0.58-7.58) years. The initial hospitalization recorded a median score of 12 (7-14) on the Mitchell and Pike OMS rating scale, decreasing to 0 (0-5) at the final follow-up. In cases of rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome, a similar therapeutic regimen was used. Nine patients underwent regular follow-ups over 4.42 (1.17-7.50) years. The mean modified Rankin scale score at first hospitalization was 4 (3-4), reducing to 1 (0-4) at the final follow-up. Only 17% (5/30) of patients across both groups exhibited poor response to this regimen. Among these 5 patients, 4 belonged to the low-risk group (without chemotherapy). DISCUSSION: OMS followed by rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia are the most common forms of PNSs in children and are associated with neuroblastoma. An aggressive approach with multiple immunotherapies may improve the prognosis of neuroblastoma-associated PNSs. The 2021 criteria perform well in pediatric PNSs. However, we propose upgrading the classification of antibody-negative rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia with neuroblastoma to definite diagnosis. This adjustment aims to further improve the diagnostic efficacy of this diagnostic criterion in childhood.

Interest of rare autoantibodies in autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: the utility (or futility) of rare antibody discovery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The increasing recognition and diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) is partly due to neural autoantibody testing and discovery. The past two decades witnessed an exponential growth in the number of identified neural antibodies. This review aims to summarize recent rare antibody discoveries in the context of central nervous system (CNS) autoimmunity and evaluate the ongoing debate about their utility. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last 5 years alone 15 novel neural autoantibody specificities were identified. These include rare neural antibody biomarkers of autoimmune encephalitis, cerebellar ataxia or other movement disorders, including multifocal presentations. SUMMARY: Although the clinical applications of these rare antibody discoveries may be limited by the low number of positive cases, they still provide important diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic insights.

The association between paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and urothelial carcinoma - A review of the literature.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are rare neurological disorders arising from malignancy-triggered autoimmunity, yet their association with urothelial carcinoma remains unclear. This systematic review intends to explore any connection, alongside patient/clinical features and management. A literature search identified 25 cases of bladder and upper tract carcinoma linked to PNS. Overall, while infrequent, a meaningful association between PNS and urothelial carcinoma was found in that 84% of cases met a 'possible'-or-'higher-likelihood' PNS diagnosis. Most cases presented with high-risk PNS phenotypes, predominantly cerebellar syndromes and encephalomyelitis/sensory neuronopathy, ∼17 months within cancer diagnosis/recurrence. Review findings suggest a female preponderance in suspected PNS despite higher male incidence of urothelial cancer. Main treatments consisted of surgery alongside chemotherapy or immunotherapeutics (IVIG and/or corticosteroids), which improved symptoms for a slight majority (60%). Ultimately, while common PNS-associated neoplasms should always first be excluded in suspected PNS, in the absence of alternative causes, urothelial carcinomas do merit clinical consideration.

Changing landscape in the field of paraneoplastic neurology: Personal perspectives over a 35-year career.

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes are a group of rare disorders that have fascinated neurologists for more than a century. The discovery in the 1980s that many of these disorders occurred in association with antibodies against neuronal proteins revived the interest for these diseases. This chapter first traces the history of the paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes during the era that preceded the discovery of immune mechanisms and then reviews the immunologic period during which many of these syndromes were found to be associated with antibodies against intracellular onconeuronal proteins and pathogenic cytotoxic T-cell mechanisms. Alongside these developments, investigations on the antibody-mediated disorders of the peripheral nervous system, such as the myasthenic syndromes or neuromyotonia, provided suggestions for the study of the central nervous system (CNS) syndromes. These converging areas of research culminated with the groundbreaking discovery of a new category of CNS disorders mediated by antibodies against neuronal surface proteins or receptors. These disorders are not always paraneoplastic, and the understanding of these syndromes and mechanisms has changed the landscape of neurology and neurosciences.

Paraneoplastic autonomic neuropathies and GI dysmotility.

A number of the well-recognized autoimmune and paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes commonly involve the autonomic nervous system. In some cases, the autonomic nerves or ganglia are primary targets of neurologic autoimmunity, as in immune-mediated autonomic ganglionopathies. In other disorders such as encephalitis, autonomic centers in the brain may be affected. The presence of autonomic dysfunction (especially gastrointestinal dysmotility) is sometimes overlooked even though this may contribute significantly to the symptom burden in these paraneoplastic disorders. Additionally, recognition of autonomic features as part of the clinical syndrome can help point the diagnostic evaluation toward autoimmune and paraneoplastic etiologies. As with other paraneoplastic disorders, the clinical syndrome and the presence and type of neurologic autoantibodies help to secure the diagnosis and direct the most appropriate investigation for malignancy. Optimal management for these conditions typically includes aggressive treatment of the neoplasm, immunomodulatory therapy, and symptomatic treatments for orthostatic hypotension and gastrointestinal dysmotility.

Clinical approach to diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

The correct diagnosis of a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS) first requires the identification of the syndrome as one of those defined as high-risk (previously called classical) or intermediate-risk for cancer in the 2021 PNS diagnostic criteria. Testing for neuronal antibodies should be restricted to these syndromes as indiscriminate request decreases the diagnostic value of the antibodies. Identifying onconeural (high-risk for cancer) or intermediate-risk for cancer antibodies supports the paraneoplastic diagnosis and mandates the search for an underlying cancer. Tumor screening must follow the published guidelines. Repeated screening is indicated in neurologic syndromes with onconeural antibodies and patients with high-risk for cancer neurologic syndromes unless they present neuronal antibodies which are not associated with cancer. Neuronal antibodies should be screened by immunohistochemistry and confirmed by immunoblot (intracellular antigens) or cell-based assay (CBA) (surface antigens). Positive results only by immunoblot or CBA should be taken with caution. Although the 2021 diagnostic criteria for PNS do not capture all PNS, as they do not allow to diagnose definite PNS neurologic syndromes without neuronal antibodies, the updated criteria represent a step forward to differentiate true PNS from neurologic syndromes that coincide in time with cancer diagnosis without having a pathogenic link.

Epidemiology of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS), initially depicted as seemingly cryptic remote manifestations of malignancy, were first described clinically in the early 20th century, with pathophysiologic correlates becoming better elucidated in the latter half of the century. There remain many questions not only about the pathophysiology but also regarding the epidemiology of these conditions. The continuous discovery of novel autoantigens and related neurologic disease has broadened the association in classical PNS to include conditions such as paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration. It has also brought into focus several other neurologic syndromes with a putative neoplastic association. These conditions are overall rare, making it difficult to capture large numbers of patients to study, and raising the question of whether incidence is increasing over time or improved identification is driving the increased numbers of cases. With the rise and increasing use of immunotherapy for cancer treatment, the incidence of these conditions is additionally expected to rise and may present with various clinical symptoms. As we enter an era of clinical trial intervention in these conditions, much work is needed to capture more granular data on population groups defined by socioeconomic characteristics such as age, ethnicity, economic resources, and gender to optimize care and clinical trial planning.

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome and autoantibody accompaniments of germ cell tumors.

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) are a group of diseases affecting the central and/or peripheral nervous system caused by immune-mediated processes directed toward antigens with shared expression in tumor and neural tissue. Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are associated with PNSs with varied clinical phenotypes. Early diagnosis of PNS is vital to potentially uncover and treat underlying tumors, improving the chances of recovery, and preventing permanent neurologic complications. In this chapter, we outline the pathophysiology and epidemiology of PNS. We briefly provide a summary of GCTs in males and females. We review the neural-specific autoantibodies and PNSs associated with GCTs and their clinical and radiologic accompaniments. We also provide an overview of the treatment and prognosis of these disorders.

Evaluation of potential prevalence of onconeural antibodies in women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To analyse onconeural antibodies in the blood serum of breast cancer patients without neurological symptoms.. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The study included 48 women with breast cancer. Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes 12 Ag (IgG) Euroline by EUROIMMUN test was used to determine onconeural antibodies: anti-Hu, anti-Yo, anti-Ri, anti-CV2, anti-Ma/anti-Ta, anti-amphiphysin, anti-recoverin, anti-SOX1, anti-tytin, anti-zic4, anti-GAD65 and anti-Tr (DNER). RESULTS: Results: The conducted analysis revealed the presence of onconeural antibodies such as: anti-recoverin, anti-CV2, anti-Zic4, anti-SOX1, anti-MA2/Ta and antititin in blood serum of women with breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Further analysis may allow the assessment of the possible clinical usefulness of these determinations.

Updates in the Management of Paraneoplastic Syndrome.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are defined as remote neurologic immune-mediated effects triggered by underlying systemic tumors. While recognizing specific syndromes can aid early cancer detection, overutilization of paraneoplastic assays in the absence of a classic syndrome can precipitate overdiagnosis and overtreatment. PNS involve autoantibodies targeting intracellular or extracellular antigens, with variable immunotherapy responses based on antigen type. Diagnosing PNS is challenging, requiring exclusion of other differential diagnoses. New diagnostic criteria classify PNS into high-risk and intermediate-risk phenotypes based on clinical phenotype, neuronal antibodies, and cancer presence. Patients with cell surface antibodies respond better to immunotherapies compared to those with intracellular antigen targets. Understanding PNS syndromes, serological markers, and oncological features guides management, which facilitates initiation of immunosuppression for PNS alongside treatment of the underlying neoplasm, thereby improving neurologic and oncologic outcomes. Initial treatments often include intravenous methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, or intravenous immunoglobulins. Second-line immunosuppressants like rituximab or cyclophosphamide may be necessary if initial treatments fail. Specific therapies vary based on antibody target. Here, we summarize the current approach to the investigation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with suspected PNS.

Management of Paraneoplastic Syndromes in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

OPINION STATEMENT: Our understanding of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) has blossomed over the past few decades. Clinicians have access to more robust diagnostic criteria and have a heightened index of suspicion for these disorders. Nonetheless, treatment, which typically includes immunosuppression, and response to treatment, varies. Due to persistent difficulty in making a definitive diagnosis, we favor empiric treatment when a possible diagnosis of PNS is suspected, and other alternative causes have substantially been excluded (e.g., infections, toxic-metabolic derangements, metastasis, or leptomeningeal disease). Treatment of the underlying cancer, if identified, is the first therapeutic step and can prevent disease worsening and in rare cases, can reverse neurologic symptoms. In addition to anti-cancer treatment, first line immunotherapies, which include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) are typically used. If partial or no benefit is seen, second line immunotherapeutic agents such as rituximab are considered. Additionally, the severity of the initial presentation and possible risk for relapse influences the use of the latter agents. Symptomatic management is also an important component in our practice and will depend on the syndrome being treated. One of the more novel entities we are facing currently is the management of immune checkpoint (ICI)-induced PNS. In those cases, current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines are followed.