Trend towards reduction of transfusion reactions using prestorage leukocyte-reduced and pooled whole blood-derived platelets and cost savings compared with poststorage whole blood-derived random platelets as evidenced by real-time hemovigilance.

BACKGROUND: Due to chemotherapy-induced neutropenia or hematologic malignancies, immunocompromised cancer patients may have higher incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions compared with the general population and frequently require platelet transfusions. This quality improvement project compared the safety of transfusion using prestorage leukocyte-reduced and pooled whole blood-derived platelets (Acrodose/WBD) with conventionally produced poststorage WBD platelets (RDP) using an active hemovigilance system. METHODS: Every patient receiving a blood product at the hospital was virtually monitored in real time by trained nurses from a remote hemovigilance unit. These nurses monitor a digital dashboard, which populates a watch list of patients from the time blood product administration is initiated until 12 hours posttransfusion. Over the course of 6 months, 371 patients receiving 792 RDP transfusions and 423 patients receiving 780 Acrodose/WBD platelets transfusions were monitored for transfusion reactions. RESULTS: We identified 26 transfusion reactions in RDP but only 12 transfusion reactions in the Acrodose/WBD platelet group. CONCLUSION: Acrodose platelet transfusion was associated with fewer transfusion reactions, which resulted in significant cost savings.

Clinical and economic impacts of large volume delayed sampling and pathogen reduction technology platelet processing strategies in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Large volume delayed sampling (LVDS) and pathogen reduction technology (PRT) are strategies for platelet processing to minimize transfusion of contaminated platelet components (PCs). This study holistically compares the economic and clinical impact of LVDS and PRT in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A decision model was constructed to simulate collection, processing, and use of PCs and to compare processing strategies: PRT with 5-day shelf life, LVDS with 7-day shelf life (LVDS7), and LVDS with 5-day shelf life extended to 7 days with secondary testing (LVDS5/2). Target population was adults requiring two or more transfusions. Collection, processing, storage, and distribution data were obtained from the National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey and published literature. Patient outcomes associated with transfusions were obtained from AABB guidelines, meta-analyses, and other published clinical studies. Costs were obtained from reimbursement schedules and other published sources. RESULTS: Given 10,000 donated units, 9512, 9511, and 9651 units of PRT, LVDS5/2, and LVDS7 PCs were available for transfusion, respectively. With these units, 1502, 2172, and 2329 transfusions can be performed with similar levels of adverse events. Assuming 30 transfusions a day, a hospital would require 69,325, 47,940, and 45,383 units of PRT, LVDS5/2, and LVDS7 platelets to perform these transfusions. The mean costs to perform transfusions were significantly higher with PRT units. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PRT, LVDS strategies were associated with lower costs and higher PC availability while patients experienced similar levels of adverse events. Increased utilization of LVDS has the potential to improve efficiency, expand patient access to platelets, and reduce health care costs.

An economic reappraisal of hepatitis B virus testing strategy for blood donors in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Taiwan is among the few hepatitis B virus (HBV) high-endemic countries that implement universal mini-pool nucleic acid testing (MP-NAT) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) testing together with confirmatory individual donor nucleic acid testing (ID-NAT) for its blood supply since 2013. The aim of this study was to reappraise the value of HBsAg test in Taiwan's HBV testing strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was constructed, and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in order to reappraise the existing HBV screening strategy in Taiwan. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the current testing strategy in Taiwan was estimated to be $US 443 154 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. This is almost six times the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold that reflects local preferences. CONCLUSION: Universal HBsAg and MP-8-NAT together with confirmatory ID-NAT testing prevents a significant amount of HBV infections from entering the Taiwan blood supply. However, this comes at a disproportionate increase in cost.

Financial analysis of large-volume delayed sampling to reduce bacterial contamination of platelets.

BACKGROUND: Effective and financially viable mitigation approaches are needed to reduce bacterial contamination of platelets in the US. Expected costs of large-volume delayed sampling (LVDS), which would be performed by a blood center prior to shipment to a hospital, were compared to those of pathogen reduction (PR), point-of-release testing (PORt), and secondary bacterial culture (SBC). METHODS: Using a Markov-based decision-tree model, the financial and clinical impact of implementing all variants of LVDS, PR, PORt, and SBC described in FDA guidance were evaluated from a hospital perspective. Hospitals were assumed to acquire leukoreduced apheresis platelets, with LVDS adding $30 per unit. Monte Carlo simulations were run to estimate the direct medical costs for platelet acquisition, testing, transfusion, and possible complications associated with each approach. Input parameters, including test sensitivity and specificity, were drawn from existing literature and costs (2018US$) were based on a hospital perspective. A one-way sensitivity analysis varied the assumed additional cost of LVDS. RESULTS: Under an approach of LVDS (7-day), the total cost per transfused unit is $735.78, which falls between estimates for SBC (7-day) and PORt. Assuming 20,000 transfusions each year, LVDS would cost $14.72 million annually. Per-unit LVDS costs would need to be less than $22.32 to be cheaper per transfusion than all other strategies, less than $32.02 to be cheaper than SBC (7-day), and less than $196.19 to be cheaper than PR (5-day). CONCLUSIONS: LVDS is an effective and cost-competitive approach, assuming additional costs to blood centers and associated charges to hospitals are modest.

Health economics of Patient Blood Management: a cost-benefit analysis based on a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient Blood Management (PBM) is the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to improve haemoglobin concentration, optimize haemostasis and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The focus of this cost-benefit analysis is to analyse the economic benefit of widespread implementation of a multimodal PBM programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a recent meta-analysis including 17 studies (>235 000 patients) comparing PBM with control care and data from the University Hospital Frankfurt, a cost-benefit analysis was performed. Outcome data were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate, number of transfused RBC units, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Costs were considered for the following three PBM interventions as examples: anaemia management including therapy of iron deficiency, use of cell salvage and tranexamic acid. For sensitivity analysis, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed. RESULTS: Iron supplementation was applied in 3·1%, cell salvage in 65% and tranexamic acid in 89% of the PBM patients. In total, applying these three PBM interventions costs €129·04 per patient. However, PBM was associated with a reduction in transfusion rate, transfused RBC units per patient, and LOS which yielded to mean savings of €150·64 per patient. Thus, the overall benefit of PBM implementation was €21·60 per patient. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the cost savings on the outcome side exceeded the PBM costs in approximately 2/3 of all repetitions and the total benefit was €1 878 000 in 100·000 simulated patients. CONCLUSION: Resources to implement a multimodal PBM concept optimizing patient care and safety can be cost-effectively.

Benefits of VISION Max automated cross-matching in comparison with manual cross-matching: A multidimensional analysis.

BACKGROUND: VISION Max (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ, USA) is a newly introduced automated blood bank system. Cross-matching (XM) is an important test confirming safety by simulating reaction between packed Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and patient blood in vitro before transfusion. We assessed the benefits of VISION Max automated XM (A-XM) in comparison with those of manual XM (M-XM) by using multidimensional analysis (cost-effectiveness and quality improvement). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a total of 327 tests (130 patients), results from A-XM and M-XM were compared. We assessed the concordance rate, risk priority number (RPN), turnaround time, hands-on time, and the costs of both methods. We further simulated their annual effects based on 37,937 XM tests in 2018. RESULTS: The concordance rate between A-XM and M-XM was 97.9% (320/327, kappa = 0.83), and the seven discordant results were incompatible for transfusion in A-XM, while compatible for transfusion in M-XM. None of the results was incompatible for transfusion in A-XM, while compatible for transfusion in M-XM, meaning A-XM detect agglutination more sensitively and consequently provides a more safe result than M-XM. A-XM was estimated to have a 6.3-fold lower risk (229 vs. 1,435 RPN), shorter turnaround time (19.1 vs. 23.3 min, P < 0.0001), shorter hands-on time (1.1 vs. 5.3 min, P < 0.0001), and lower costs per single test than M-XM (1.44 vs. 2.70 USD). A-XM permitted annual savings of 46 million RPN, 15.1 months of daytime workers' labor, and 47,042 USD compared with M-XM. CONCLUSION: This is the first attempt to implement A-XM using VISION Max. VISION Max A-XM appears to be a safe, practical, and reliable alternative for pre-transfusion workflow with the potential to improve quality and cost-effectiveness in the blood bank.

Pathogen Reduction: The State of the Science in 2019.

In the past 30 years, transfusion safety has increased substantially and blood transfusion is now a safer procedure than at any time in the past. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of pathogen reduction, which is the new paradigm in transfusion safety. Specifically, we describe the various processes and technologies that are capable of diminishing or neutralizing infectious threats, including those that are not addressed or may not be detected by standard screening techniques. A special emphasis is placed on recent developments that are likely to impact patient care in 2019 and beyond.

Hepatitis E Virus Infection in Blood Donors and Risk to Patients in the United States and Canada.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the most common cause of acute hepatitis worldwide including large water-borne outbreaks, zoonotic infections and transfusion transmissions. Several countries have initiated or are considering blood donor screening in response to high HEV-RNA donation prevalence leading to transfusion-transmission risk. Because HEV transmission is more common through food sources, the efficacy of blood donor screening alone may be limited. HEV-nucleic acids in 101 489 blood donations in the United States and Canada were studied. A risk-based decision-making framework was used to evaluate the quantitative risks and cost-benefit of HEV-blood donation screening in Canada comparing three scenarios: no screening, screening blood for all transfused patients or screening blood for only those at greatest risk. HEV-RNA prevalence in the United States was one per 16 908 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1:5786-1:81987), whereas Canadian HEV-RNA prevalence was one per 4615 (95% CI, 1:2579-1:9244). Although 4-fold greater, Canadian HEV-RNA prevalence was not significantly higher than in the United States. Viral loads ranged from 20 to 3080 international units per mL; all successfully typed infections were genotype 3. No HEV-RNA false-positive donations were identified for 100 percent specificity. Without donation screening, heart and lung transplant recipients had the greatest HEV-infection risk (1:366962) versus kidney transplant recipients with the lowest (1:2.8 million) at costs of $225 546 to $561 810 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for partial or universal screening, respectively. Higher cost per QALY would be expected in the United States. Thus, HEV prevalence in North America is lower than in countries performing blood donation screening, and if implemented, is projected to be costly under any scenario.

Implementation of a patient blood management program in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Editorial, p. 2763).

BACKGROUND: Recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are among the highest consumers of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) components. The impact of patient blood management (PBM) efforts on HSCT recipients is poorly understood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational study assessed changes in blood product use and patient-centered outcomes before and after implementing a multidisciplinary PBM program for patients undergoing HSCT at a large academic medical center. The pre-PBM cohort was treated from January 1 through September 31, 2013; the post-PBM cohort was treated from January 1 through September 31, 2015. RESULTS: We identified 708 patients; 284 of 352 (80.7%) in the pre-PBM group and 225 of 356 (63.2%) in the post-PBM group received allogeneic RBCs (p < 0.001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) RBC volumes were higher before PBM than after PBM (3 [2-4] units vs. 2 [1-4] units; p = 0.004). A total of 259 of 284 pre-PBM patients (91.2%) and 57 of 225 (25.3%) post-PBM patients received RBC transfusions when hemoglobin levels were more than 7 g/dL (p < 0.001). The median (IQR) PLT transfusion quantities was 3 (2-5) units for pre-PBM patients and 2 (1-4) units for post-PBM patients (p < 0.001). For patients with PLT counts of more than 10 × 109 /L, a total of 1219 PLT units (73.4%) were transfused before PBM and 691 units (48.8%) were transfused after PBM (p < 0.001). Estimated transfusion expenditures were reduced by $617,152 (18.3%). We noted no differences in clinical outcomes or transfusion-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Patient blood management implementation for HSCT recipients was associated with marked reductions in allogeneic RBC and PLT transfusions and decreased transfusion-related costs with no detrimental impact on clinical outcomes.

An assessment of the risk, cost-effectiveness, and perceived benefits of anti-parvovirus B19 tested blood products.

BACKGROUND: Parvovirus B19 (B19V) can cause severe anemia, hydrops foetalis, and even death in vulnerable patients. To prevent transfusion-transmitted B19V infection of at-risk patients, B19V antibody screening of blood donors was implemented. The cost-effectiveness of this intervention is unclear, as the likelihood of transmission through blood and subsequent complications for recipients are unknown. This study estimates the cost-effectiveness of anti-B19V donor screening in the Netherlands. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The estimates needed for the cost-effectiveness model were: the occurrence of B19V in Dutch blood donors, the number of anti-B19V tested products required by hospitals, the likelihood of morbidity and mortality given B19V infection, treatment costs, and screening costs. These estimates were obtained from literature and observational data. When data were unavailable, structured expert judgment elicitation and statistical modeling were applied. RESULTS: The costs of preventing one transfusion transmitted B19V infection are estimated at €68,942 (€42,045 - €102,080). On average, 1.25 cases of morbidity and 0.12 cases of mortality are prevented annually. Although the perceived risk of transfusion transmitted B19V infection was low, half of the treating physicians favored anti-B19V screening. CONCLUSION: The estimated mortality and morbidity caused by B19V infection was low in the risk groups. The cost-effectiveness ratio is similar to other blood safety screening measures. No guidance exists to evaluate the acceptability of this ratio. The explicit overview of costs and effects may further guide the discussion of the desirability of B19V safe blood products.

Screening the Blood Supply for Zika Virus in the 50 U.S. States and Puerto Rico: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Background: In 2016, universal individual donation nucleic acid testing (ID-NAT) of donated blood for Zika virus began in U.S. states and territories. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of universal ID-NAT in the first year of screening compared with alternatives for the 50 states and separately for Puerto Rico. Design: Microsimulation that captured Zika-related harms to transfusion recipients, sexual partners, and their infants. Data Sources: National testing results compiled by AABB and costs, utilities, and outcome probabilities estimated from the literature. Target Population: Transfusion recipients. Time Horizon: Lifetime. Perspective: Societal. Intervention: Universal ID-NAT, universal mini-pool NAT (MP-NAT), and ID-NAT exclusively for components transfused to women of childbearing age. Seasonally targeted strategies in Puerto Rico and geographically targeted strategies in the 50 states were also considered. Outcome Measures: Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and outcomes. Results of Base-Case Analysis: In Puerto Rico, MP-NAT exclusively during high mosquito season was cost-effective at $81 123 per QALY (95% CI, -$49 138 to $978 242 per QALY). No screening policy was cost-effective in the 50 states. Universal ID-NAT cost $341 million per QALY (CI, $125 million to $2.90 billion per QALY) compared with no screening in the 50 states. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: In Puerto Rico, MP-NAT only during the season of high mosquito activity was most cost-effective in 64% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis iterations. In the 50 states, no intervention was cost-effective in 99.99% of iterations. Cost-effectiveness was highly dependent on the rate of assumed infectious donations. Limitation: Data were limited on the component-specific transmissibility of Zika and long-term sequelae of infection. Conclusion: Screening was cost-effective only in the high mosquito season in Puerto Rico, and no evaluated screening policy was cost-effective in the 50 states. During periods with lower rates of Zika-infectious donations, the cost-effectiveness of screening will be even less favorable. Primary Funding Source: None.

Modelling the risk of transfusion-transmitted syphilis: a reconsideration of blood donation testing strategies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Donor syphilis testing began in the 1940s amidst widespread transfusion-transmitted syphilis (TTS). Since then, the introduction of penicillin, pre-donation screening questionnaires and improved storage conditions have contributed to reducing transmission risk. Consequently, universal testing may no longer be cost-effective. This study analysed alternative options for donor syphilis testing to determine the optimal strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A model was developed using conservative parameter estimates for factors affecting TTS and 2009-2015 Australian donations to calculate risk outcomes (TTS infections, tertiary syphilis in recipients and transfusion-associated congenital syphilis) and cost-effectiveness of alternative testing strategies. The strategies modelled were as follows: universal testing, targeted-testing of high-risk groups (males ≤50 years old and first-time donors) and no testing. RESULTS: The estimated risk of TTS is one in 49·5 million transfusions for universal testing, one in 6 million for targeted-testing of males ≤50 years old, one in 4 million for targeted-testing of first-time donors and one in 2·8 million for no testing. For all strategies, the risk of tertiary and congenital syphilis is <1 in 100 million. Universal testing is the least cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) estimated at $538·5 million per disability-adjusted life year averted. CONCLUSION: Universal testing is not required to maintain the risk of TTS within tolerable limits and is estimated to greatly exceed acceptable ICERs for blood safety interventions. However, despite a strong economic and risk-based rationale, given the epidemiology of syphilis in Australia is changing, feedback from critical stakeholders is not currently supportive of reducing testing.

Risk-based decision making in transfusion medicine.

Formal processes to assess risk are well established in numerous areas of society including the environment, transportation, energy and food production sectors as well as some areas of health care such as new drugs or other therapeutic goods. However, these processes and their associated frameworks have only recently come to be used to make decisions in blood transfusion practice or in blood system policy development. This review describes the evolution of the use of risk-based decision making and discusses the elements that should be considered in its application to blood system issues. Following the identification and characterization of the risk, a structured process is undertaken to assess the magnitude of the risk and the level of risk reduction that can reasonably be achieved in the context of the complexity of the risk management action proposed and its cost. Inputs must be sought from appropriate subject matter experts, but also from those who can consider issues of ethics and social values. Engagement of the public is an essential step. Proposed interventions should be assessed for their likelihood of mitigating the risk and the proportional resource allocation in comparison with similar risks to the blood system or health system. Examples are provided of how a risk-based decision-making framework is used to address identified risks in the blood system.

Our experience in riboflavin and ultraviolet light pathogen reduction technology for platelets: from platelet production to patient care.

BACKGROUND: Pathogen reduction technology (PRT) enhances blood component safety, but its implementation is hampered by loss of blood quality and cost. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost of 9673 riboflavin and ultraviolet light-treated platelet (PLT) transfusions given to 1211 patients during a 3-year period. The results were compared with the efficacy, safety, and cost of 6424 nontreated PLT transfusions administered to 1500 patients during a 3-year comparison period before PRT implementation. RESULTS: Despite a similar PLT transfusion dose per unit for both periods (pre-PRT period 3.26 vs. PRT period 3.19), the mean number of PLT concentrates per patient (4.2 vs. 7.8; p = 0.006) and the total dose of PLTs received by patients were higher in the PRT period (13.6 vs. 24.8; p = 0.0002). Hematology and medical and surgical patient categories had the highest PLT use per patient. However, febrile (2.5% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.02) and allergic (0.16% vs. 0.08%; p = 0.01) reactions were lower during the PRT period. The blood center saved €284,805.58 due to a reduction of outdated PLTs from 16.8% to 0.72% after PRT implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Although PRT can improve PLT safety, it can increase the amount of PLTs required for transfusion in some patient categories. The cost of PRT can be partially offset by the savings associated with a lower rate of PLT outdates. This cost reduction can be a key factor in settings where inventory management is challenged by a high percentage of wasted PLTs due to outdating.

Efforts Toward Elimination of Infectious Agents in Blood Products.

The US blood supply has never been safer. This level of safety depends on a multifaceted approach including blood donor screening, sensitive infectious disease testing, and good manufacturing practice. However, risks remain for transfusion-transmitted infections due to bacterial contamination of platelets and emerging diseases. Thus, ongoing improvements in screening and testing are required. Newer pathogen reduction technologies have shown promise in further ameliorating the safety of the blood supply.

Report of a workshop on ensuring sustainable access to safe blood in developing countries: International Blood Safety Forum, March 24, 2017.

On March 24, 2017, more than 90 experts in blood safety and international development from blood centers, industry, government, and international and nongovernmental organizations gathered in Arlington, Virginia, for the Third International Blood Safety Forum, cosponsored by America's Blood Centers and Global Healing. This report summarizes presentations and major conclusions. The meeting explored ways to increase access to affordable, safe blood for low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) in an era when funding from the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the Global Fund has been redirected from preventing the spread of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to diagnosing and treating the 25 million-plus people living with HIV in LMICs. More effective management systems must be developed to improve cost recovery for blood. While blood systems become more sustainable, continued investment is required to keep them operating. The traditional model of large grants from bilateral and multilateral donors will need to be supplemented (or replaced) with public-private partnerships and nongovernmental investment. A continued emphasis on quality is fundamental. Blood systems must build quality programs, based on accepted standards, including hospitals, clinics, and rural health care providers to ensure proper and safe use of blood. Proposals to resolve health care inequities between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs) must include helping LMICs to define sustainable national policies and practices for blood availability and utilization to suit local contexts. The blood safety lexicon should be revised to include availability, accessibility, and affordability of safe blood and blood products as the goal of all blood safety initiatives.

Addressing gaps in international blood availability and transfusion safety in low- and middle-income countries: a NHLBI workshop.

In April 2017, a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, and the Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science was held to discuss blood availability and transfusion safety in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The purpose of the workshop was to identify research opportunities for implementation science (IS) to improve the availability of safe blood and blood components and transfusion practices in LMICs. IS describes the late stages of the translational research spectrum and studies optimal and sustainable strategies to deliver proven-effective interventions. Regional working groups were formed to focus on opportunities and challenges in East Africa, Central/West Africa, Middle East and North Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, Southeast Asia, Western Pacific Asia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. The need for an "adequate supply of safe blood" emerged as the major overriding theme. Among the regional working groups, common cross-cutting themes were evident. The majority of research questions, priorities, and strategies fell into the categories of blood availability, blood transfusion safety, appropriate use of blood, quality systems, health economics and budgeting, and training and education in IS. The workshop also brought into focus inadequate country-level data that can be used as the basis for IS initiatives. A mixed approach of needs assessment and targeted interventions with sufficient evidence base to move toward sustainment is an appropriate next step for blood availability and transfusion safety research in LMICs.

[Is the research of posttransfusional alloantibodies still relevant?] / Est-ce que la réalisation de la recherche d'anticorps antiérythrocytaires post­transfusionnelle est toujours pertinente ?

The decision of November 6th, 2006 defining the principles of best practices recommends that posttransfusional red cell alloantibodies research is performed after one to three months after. In the University hospital of Brest, the haemovigilance unit takes charge of sending the medical prescription within the required time and centralizing the results. We wished to estimate if the realization of this research still remains relevant. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed in 2015. We evaluated the realization rate, the red cell alloantibodies rate and the recipient adverse reactions with the diagnostic category: alloimmunization (delayed serological transfusion reaction, DSTR). RESULTS: In 2015, 2162 prescriptions were sent to the 3271 transfused patients. One thousand and eighteen red cell alloantibodies research were done, i.e. a return rate of 61%. Among them, 12 alloantibodies appeared (0.9%) within an average of 56 days. Thirty-three other alloantibodies appeared and were discovered most frequently before a new transfusion. In 10 cases, a posttransfusional research was done that was negative. A survey was conducted among GHCOH members to describe the practices in these health institutions. Twelve questionnaires were analysed. Ten institutions performed a posttransfusional alloantibodies research by issuing a prescription at the patient's exit with a return rate between 0.14 and 16%; 1 institution has a centralized organization with a return rate of 68.3%; 1566 red cell alloantibodies research were performed and among them, 24 alloantibodies appeared (1.53%). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that to be effective, the management of this biological test must be centralized. Despite this, the red cell alloantibodies rate remains very low (0.9 and 1.53%) and raises the question of the relevance of this systematic testing after transfusion, which is in any case mandatory before a new transfusion of red blood cells.