Military Hospital Spending on Environmental Services and Inpatient Satisfaction Ratings.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: To assess the impact of military hospital expenditures on environmental services (EVS) on inpatient satisfaction, the authors collected Defense Health Agency TRICARE Inpatient Satisfaction Survey data from fiscal years 2011 through 2013, military hospital EVS spending and workload data, facility construction/renovation data, and military health system inpatient administrative claims data. Multivariate logistic regression for panel data was performed independently for medical/surgical and obstetric product lines and each satisfaction question. A statistically significant positive relationship was found between hospital EVS spending and patient satisfaction, with the highest expenditure levels generally exhibiting a greater association with satisfaction. Statistically significant increases in satisfaction with cleanliness were associated with higher levels of hospital expenditures on EVS.

Researching effective approaches to cleaning in hospitals: protocol of the REACH study, a multi-site stepped-wedge randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The Researching Effective Approaches to Cleaning in Hospitals (REACH) study will generate evidence about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a novel cleaning initiative that aims to improve the environmental cleanliness of hospitals. The initiative is an environmental cleaning bundle, with five interdependent, evidence-based components (training, technique, product, audit and communication) implemented with environmental services staff to enhance hospital cleaning practices. METHODS/DESIGN: The REACH study will use a stepped-wedge randomised controlled design to test the study intervention, an environmental cleaning bundle, in 11 Australian hospitals. All trial hospitals will receive the intervention and act as their own control, with analysis undertaken of the change within each hospital based on data collected in the control and intervention periods. Each site will be randomised to one of the 11 intervention timings with staggered commencement dates in 2016 and an intervention period between 20 and 50 weeks. All sites complete the trial at the same time in 2017. The inclusion criteria allow for a purposive sample of both public and private hospitals that have higher-risk patient populations for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The primary outcome (objective one) is the monthly number of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemias (SABs), Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) and vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) infections, per 10,000 bed days. Secondary outcomes for objective one include the thoroughness of hospital cleaning assessed using fluorescent marker technology, the bio-burden of frequent touch surfaces post cleaning and changes in staff knowledge and attitudes about environmental cleaning. A cost-effectiveness analysis will determine the second key outcome (objective two): the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio from implementation of the cleaning bundle. The study uses the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (iPARIHS) framework to support the tailored implementation of the environmental cleaning bundle in each hospital. DISCUSSION: Evidence from the REACH trial will contribute to future policy and practice guidelines about hospital environmental cleaning. It will be used by healthcare leaders and clinicians to inform decision-making and implementation of best-practice infection prevention strategies to reduce HAIs in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12615000325505.

[Definition of "Safety and Hygiene Packages" as a management model for the Hospital Hygiene Service (HHS)]. / Definizione di "Pacchetti Sicurezza e Igiene" come modello organizzativo e gestionale per la sicurezza in Ospedale di un Servizio di Igiene Ospedaliera.

The purpose of this research is to identify and formalize the Hospital Hygiene Service activities and products, evaluating them in a cost accounting management view. The ultimate aim, is to evaluate the financial adverse events prevention impact, in an Hospital Hygiene Service management. A three step methodology based on affinity grouping activities, was employed. This methodology led us to identify 4 action areas, with 23 related productive processes, and 86 available safety packages. Owing to this new methodology, we was able to implement a systematic evaluation of the furnished services.

Examining the effect of EVS spending on HCAHPS scores: a value optimization matrix for expense management.

Using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Value-Based Purchasing program has now linked patient care experience rating to hospital revenue reimbursement, thereby establishing a key relationship between revenue cycle management and the patient experience. However, little data exist on the effect of hospital resource spending on patient HCAHPS ratings. This article examines environmental services (EVS) expenses and HCAHPS ratings on hospital cleanliness and overall patient experience ratings to determine how these variables are related. No linear relationship between EVS expense spending and HCAHPS ratings was found, but post hoc analysis identified a matrix that differentiated on hospital cleanliness ratings and overall EVS spending. A value score was calculated for each quadrant of the matrix, and it was determined that organizational value derives from management of expense spending rather than pursuit of high HCAHPS scores. A value optimization matrix is introduced, and its four quadrants are described. With increased emphasis on subjective patient experience measures attached to financial consequences, leaders in the healthcare industry must understand the link between expense management and HCAHPS performance. This study has shown that effective operations are derived from the efficient use of resources and are supported by strong leadership, strategic management, and a culture of patient-centered achievement. The capacity of healthcare organizations to identify their unique costs-to-outcomes balance through the value optimization matrix will help provide them with a means to ensure that optimal value is extracted from all expense spending.

A cost analysis of monoplace hyperbaric oxygen therapy with and without recirculation.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is covered by the NHS under Specialist Services Definition Set 28. The indications and availability of the therapy have been influenced by educational failures, perceived costs and, compared with drug studies, the small number of controlled trials. This study aimed to inform this debate by calculating the direct costs to the health service of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for inpatients using a single, one-person chamber. METHOD: The costs included in this cost analysis were: hyperbaric chambers, staff, oxygen, property and cleaning, miscellaneous and general overheads. All costs are for 2004. RESULTS: Lower and upper costs were calculated. Start-up costs range from pounds 64,800 to pounds 110,000 depending on the hardware selected. Annual costs, including 10-year amortisation of capital costs, range from pounds 40,069 to pounds 57,618 and per-treatment costs range from pounds 30 to pounds 41. Oxygen recirculation becomes cost effective after four to six years. CONCLUSION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is an inexpensive treatment that should be routinely available for conditions where evidence indicates that tissue hypoxia is a significant component of the injury or disease.

Clean and green. Implementing environmentally friendly cleaning practices.

Whether the motivation is worker safety, reducing liability issues, averting the threat of negative press, or because they're truly committed to practicing environmentally preferable purchasing--more hospitals are realizing the need to institute green cleaning practices.