Impacto de la pandemia en la actividad de las unidades de cirugía reconstructiva urológica y de andrología en España durante el estado de alarma (COVID-19) en 2020: resultados de una encuesta nacional / The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on reconstructive urologic surgery and andrology Spanish units’ practice during the state of alarm in 2020: National survey

Introducción: El estado de alarma debido a la COVID-19 revolucionó la actividad asistencial y quirúrgica. Dentro de la enfermedad urológica, aquellas consideradas «demorables» como la andrológica y la reconstructiva sufrieron un retraso considerable en su atención. Material y métodos: En mayo de 2020, tras haber superado casi la primera ola de la pandemia y en pleno estado de alarma, se envió una encuesta con 24 ítems a 120 urólogos integrados en los Grupos de Cirugía Reconstructiva Urológica y Andrología de la Asociación Española de Urología (AEU) para conocer la repercusión asistencial sobre la actividad clínica y quirúrgica en ambas subespecialidades. Resultados: Se alcanzó una tasa de respuesta del 75,8% con 91 encuestas recibidas. Previo al estado de alarma, el 49,5% disponía de uno a 2 quirófanos semanales, el 71,4% afrontaba una lista de espera quirúrgica de entre 3 y 12 meses, y el 39,6% atendía entre 20 y 40 pacientes semanales en consulta. Durante el estado de alarma, el 95,6% recibió directrices sobre cirugías a realizar, priorizando la cirugía urgente y la oncológica. En el 85,7% de los centros no se realizó ninguna cirugía andrológica ni reconstructiva. Alrededor del 50% de las consultas no fueron presenciales, recurriendo a la telemedicina (teléfono o e-mail) en la mayoría de los casos. Conclusiones: Las repercusiones de la pandemia sobre las enfermedades andrológicas y las candidatas a cirugía reconstructiva fueron muy importantes. Tras casi 2 años del inicio de la pandemia, aún queda por determinar el verdadero impacto final en nuestro sistema sanitario (AU)

Introduction: In Spain the state of alarm secondary to COVID-19 dramatically changed the medical and surgical assistance activity of other pathologies. Regarding urological pathologies, those considered as «non-urgent» (andrology and reconstructive surgery) were postponed or even unattended. Material and methods: In May 2020, once the first COVID-19 wave was almost over and still in the state of alarm, a 24-item survey was sent to 120 urologists from the Andrology Group and the Urologic Reconstructive Surgery Group of the Spanish Urological Association (AEU). Its aim was to determine the impact on clinical and surgical practice in both subspecialties. Results: We observed a response rate of 75.8% with 91 answered surveys. Before the state of alarm, 49.5% of urologists had 1-2 weekly surgical sessions available, surgical waiting list was 3-12 months for the 71.4%, and 39.6% attended between 20-40 patients weekly in office. During the state of alarm, 95.6% were given any kind of surgical guidelines, prioritizing emergency and oncologic pathologies. In the 85.7% of the hospitals neither andrology nor reconstructive surgeries were performed. In office, around 50% of patients were attended not on-site, most of them through telemedicine (phone calls and e-mails). Conclusions The negative pandemic implications in relation to the andrology and reconstructive surgery pathologies were truly important. After almost 2 years from the start of the pandemic, the true final impact on our health system has yet to be determined (AU)

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urological emergencies: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 pandemic represents a novel challenge for healthcare systems, and it affects even the daily urological practice. Italy was the first country after China to experience a lock-down period. Our objective is to determine whether, during the COVID-19 period, there has been any modification in urological emergencies. METHODS: we retrospectively reviewed urgent urological consultations requested by the Emergency Department (ED) of Padua University Hospital in the 36-day period between February 22nd and March 30th, 2020 and compared them to the prior year cases within a similar time frame (February 24th to March 31st, 2019). Pediatric population (age < 15 years); surgical complications and traumas were excluded to avoid confounding from the reduction of activities during the lockdown. The number of daily consultations, the number of invasive procedures performed and admissions were evaluated, together with the predictors of admission were identified through multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: The final sample resulted in 107 consultations performed in 2020 and 266 in 2019. A higher number of daily consultations was performed during 2019 (7.33 vs 2.97, p < 0.001). Similarly, the number of daily-invasive procedures was higher in 2019 (p = 0.006), while there was no difference in the number of daily admissions (15 vs 12, p = 0.80). On multivariate analysis, the year (2020 vs 2019, OR 2.714, 95% CI 1.096-6.757, p = 0.0297) was a significant predictor of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent urology practice was affected during COVID-19 pandemic with a remarkable reduction in urgent urological consultations; furthermore, a higher risk of admissions was observed in 2020. The consequences of a potentially delayed diagnosis remain to be determined.

Evaluación de las tendencias y presentación clínica de pacientes con cólico nefrítico que acuden al servicio de urgencias durante la era pandémica del COVID-19 / Assessment of trends and clinical presentation in the emergency department of patients with renal colic during the COVID-19 pandemic era

INTRODUCCIÓN: Nuestra hipótesis es que la pandemia por COVID-19, y el estado de alarma impuesto por los gobiernos, pueden haber retrasado las visitas a urgencias por cólicos nefríticos, debido al miedo a contagiarse en los centros sanitarios. Este atraso en acudir a los servicios de urgencias puede llevar a un empeoramiento clínico y aumentar las complicaciones relacionadas con la enfermedad o el tratamiento recibido. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos una revisión retrospectiva de 3 centros hospitalarios en España e Italia. Fueron incluidos pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias por cólico renal (unilateral o bilateral) secundario a litiasis confirmadas en pruebas de imagen durante los 45 días previos y posteriores a la declaración del estado de alarma de cada país. Se recolectaron datos demográficos, síntomas y signos de presentación, análisis de sangre y orina, pruebas de imagen, y manejo terapéutico. El análisis estadístico se realizó entre dos grupos, Grupo A: pacientes que acudieron antes de la declaración del estado de alarma y Grupo B: pacientes que acudieron tras la declaración del estado de alarma. RESULTADOS: Un total de 397 pacientes que acudieron a urgencias por cólicos nefríticos secundarios a litiasis fueron incluidos en el estudio, 285 (71,8%) en el Grupo A y 112 (28,2%) en el Grupo B (p < 0,001). Un total de 135 (47,4%) en el Grupo A y 63 (56,3%) en el Grupo B (p = 0,11) admitieron haber pospuesto su búsqueda de atención médica urgente. En el momento de la valoración inicial, no se encontraron diferencias entre ambos grupos en los niveles de creatinina sérica, leucocitosis, fiebre, oliguria, dolor, o hidronefrosis. Además, no se observaron diferencias en relación con la estancia media, ingreso en el servicio de urología, o necesidad de tratamientos invasivos. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestros resultados muestran una disminución significativa de atenciones en urgencias por cólicos nefríticos tras la declaración del estado de alarma en España e Italia. A diferencia de otros estudios publicados recientemente, no encontramos diferencias en la estancia media, ingreso al servicio de urología, o necesidad de tratamientos invasivos en pacientes que se presentaron antes y después del estado de alarma

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized that the recent COVID-19 pandemic may lead to a delay in renal colic patients presenting to the Emergency Department due to the fear of getting infected. This delay may lead to a more severe clinical condition at presentation with possible complications for the patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of data collected from three institutions from Spain and Italy. Patients who presented to Emergency Department with unilateral or bilateral renal colic caused by imaging confirmed urolithiasis during the 45 days before and after each national lockdown were included. Data collected included patients’ demographics, biochemical urine and blood tests, radiological tests, signs, symptoms and the therapeutic management. Analysis was performed between two groups, Group A: patients presenting prior to the national lockdown date; and Group B: patients presenting after the national lockdown date. RESULTS: A total of 397 patients presented to Emergency Department with radiology confirmed urolithiasis and were included in the study. The number of patients presenting to Emergency Department with renal/ureteric colic was 285 (71.8%) patients in Group A and 112 (28.2%) patients in Group B (p < 0.001). The number of patients reporting a delay in presentation was 135 (47.4%) in Group A and 63 (56.3%) in Group B (p = 0.11). At presentation, there were no statistical differences between Group A and Group B regarding the serum creatinine level, C reactive protein, white blood cell count, fever, oliguria, flank pain and hydronephrosis. In addition, no significant differences were observed with the length of stay, Urology department admission requirement and type of therapy. CONCLUSION: Data from our study showed a significant reduction in presentations to Emergency Department for renal colic after the lockdown in Spain and Italy. However, we did not find any significant difference with the length of stay, Urology department admission requirement and type of therapy

Cirugía urológica durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Análisis descriptivo de la experiencia en un Servicio de Urología durante distintas fases epidemiológicas / Urological surgery during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Descriptive analysis of the experience in a Urology Department across the pandemic phases

INTRODUCCIÓN: La pandemia por SARS-CoV-2 ha cambiado la práctica urológica a nivel mundial. Nuestro objetivo es describir los resultados en salud observados en los pacientes intervenidos en el Servicio de Urología de un hospital terciario, a lo largo de diferentes fases epidemiológicas. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes observacional que incluye todos los pacientes intervenidos entre el 1 de marzo y el 14 de mayo. Según la organización hospitalaria, distinguimos 3 periodos: durante las primeras 2 semanas no hubo cambios (1.er periodo), en las 7 semanas siguientes solo se realizaron intervenciones urgentes previa extracción de exudado nasofaríngeo (2.o periodo), y tras el 4 de mayo se reanudó la cirugía electiva aplicando un protocolo de cribado multidisciplinar (3.er periodo). Las variables demográficas y basales, las quirúrgicas y perioperatorias, así como los resultados postoperatorios, se obtuvieron de forma retrospectiva (periodos 1 y 2) y prospectiva (periodo 3). El seguimiento telefónico se realizó al menos 3 semanas tras el alta hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 103 cirugías urológicas y fueron diagnosticados de COVID-19 11 pacientes, 8 de ellos en el 1.er periodo. El diagnóstico era conocido en un paciente, mientras que los otros 10 desarrollaron la enfermedad en una media de 25 días tras la intervención y 16,6 días tras el alta. Cuatro de 7 pacientes trasplantados resultaron afectados. Se registraron 3 muertes por la enfermedad: una mujer de 69 años trasplantada y 2 varones mayores de 80 años con comorbilidades y alto riesgo anestésico a los que se realizó drenaje de absceso retroperitoneal y cirugía retrógrada intrarrenal, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: La infección por SARS-CoV-2 afectó principalmente a trasplantados renales o pacientes añosos con alto riesgo anestésico, durante las 2 primeras semanas de la pandemia. Tras implantar la PCR preoperatoria y un protocolo completo de cribado, los casos se redujeron de manera sustancial y se pudo operar con seguridad

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has changed the urological practice around the world. Our objective is to describe the outcomes presented by patients undergoing surgery in the urology department of a tertiary hospital, across the pandemic phases. METHODS: Observational, cohort study including all patients undergoing surgery from March 1 to May 14. According to the hospital organization, we identified three periods: there were no changes during the first two weeks (1st. period), the following seven weeks, when only urgent interventions were carried out after performance of nasopharyngeal swab test (2nd. period), and finally, elective surgery was resumed on May 4, after the implementation of a multidisciplinary screening protocol (3rd. period). Demographic, baseline, surgical and perioperative variables, as well as postoperative outcomes, were obtained in a retrospective (periods 1 and 2) and prospective (period 3) manner. Telephone follow-up was initiated at least 3 weeks after hospital discharge. RESULTS: 103 urological surgeries were performed, and 11 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 8 of them within the 1st. period. The diagnosis was already known in 1 patient, while the other 10 developed the disease in an average of 25 days after the intervention and 16,6 days after discharge. Of seven transplant patients, four got the infection. Three deaths were recorded due to the disease: a 69-year-old woman transplanted and two men over 80 with comorbidities and high anesthetic risk who underwent drainage of retroperitoneal abscess and retrograde intrarenal surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection mainly affected renal transplant recipients or elderly patients with high anesthetic risk, during the first 2 weeks of the pandemic. After implementing preoperative PCR tests and a comprehensive screening protocol, cases were substantially reduced, and safe surgical procedures were achieved

Los cambios producidos durante el estado de alarma debido a la COVID-19 en un Servicio de Urología de un Hospital Universitario Terciario en Portugal / What has changed during the state of emergency due to COVID-19 on an Academic Urology Department of a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal

OBJETIVO: Comparar la actividad del Servicio de Urología de un Hospital Universitario Portugués durante el estado de alarma y el periodo equivalente del año anterior. Comparamos el número de consultas electivas y pruebas diagnósticas urológicas, el número y el tipo de cirugías electivas, así como las características demográficas de los pacientes y las principales causas de ingreso al Servicio de Urgencias (SU) de Urología durante los dos periodos mencionados. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Los datos de 691 pacientes que acudieron a urgencias desde el 18 de marzo de 2020 hasta el 2 de mayo de 2020 -y del mismo periodo del año anterior- se recogieron del software medico institucional. Los datos recopilados fueron edad, sexo, fecha de visita al servicio de urgencias, derivación desde otros hospitales, color del triaje, causa del ingreso, diagnóstico al alta y la necesidad de cirugía de urgencia u hospitalización. Con la intención de identificar las asociaciones entre las variables demográficas y clínicas con el hecho de haber sido sometido a una cirugía de urgencia (variable), se aplicaron modelos de regresión logística. RESULTADOS: El análisis multivariante mostró asociación entre el sexo del paciente con el hecho de ser sometido a una cirugía, con una disminución del 65,6% en las probabilidades para el género masculino. El periodo (COVID versus sin-COVID) no mostró una asociación significativa con la cirugía. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestro departamento experimentó una reducción importante en la actividad. También observamos una reducción de las causas urgentes para acudir a los servicios de urgencias considerados menos graves. El porcentaje de casos que requirieron cirugía de urgencia y hospitalización fue mayor durante el periodo COVID

OBJECTIVE: To compare the activity the Urology Department of a Portuguese Academic Hospital during the state of emergency and the equivalent period at the previous year. We compared the number of elective consultations and diagnostic urologic examinations, number and type of elective surgeries, as well as patients’ demographic characteristics and main causes of presentation to Urology Emergency Department (ED) during the two mentioned periods MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 691 patients coming to emergency department were collected from institutional clinical software from March 18 th 2020 to May 2 nd 2020 - and from the same period the previous year. Data collected were age, sex, day of the presentation to Emergency Department, referral from other hospitals, triage color, reason of admission, diagnosis of discharge, and the need for emergency surgery or hospitalization. In order to identify associations between demographic and clinical variables with having been submitted to an emergency surgery (outcome), logistic regression models were applied. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis showed an association of sex with being submitted to surgery, 65.6% decrease in the odds for the male gender. The period (COVID versus non-COVID) did not show a significant association with surgery. CONCLUSION: Our department experienced a noticeable activity reduction. We also observe a reduction in urgent causes to attend the ED considered less serious. The percentage of cases requiring emergency surgery and hospitalization was higher during COVID-period

Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Units in Spain: a national survey on standards of structure, resources, results and patient safety. / Unidades de Enfermedad Renal Crónica Avanzada en España: una encuesta nacional sobre los estándares de estructura, recursos, resultados y seguridad del paciente.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recently, the Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Units (UERCA, in Spanish) have been developed in Spain to offer a better quality of life to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD), improving their survival and reducing morbidity in this phase of the disease. Nowadays, there is not much evidence in the Spanish and international literature regarding the structure and how to achieve these objectives in the UERCA. From the ERCA working group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), this project is promoted to improve care for ERCA patients through the definition of quality standards for the operation of the UERCA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An initial proposal for quality standards concerning the operation of the UERCA was configured through consultation with the main sources of references and the advice of an expert working group through face-to-face and telematic meetings. Base on this initial proposal of standards, a survey was conducted and sent it via email to 121 nephrology specialist and nursing professionals with experience in Spanish UERCA to find out, among others, the suitability of each standards, that is, its mandatory nature or recommendation as standards. The access to the survey was allowed between July 16th, 2018, until September 26th, 2018. RESULTS: A total of 95 (78.5%) professionals participated out of the 121 who were invited to participate. Of these, 80 of the participants were nephrology specialists and 15 nursing professionals, obtaining a varied representation of professionals from the Spanish geography. After analyzing the opinions of these participants, the standards were defined to a total of 68, 37 of them (54.4%) mandatory and 31 of them (45.5%) recommended. Besides, it was observed that the volume of patients attended in the UERCA is usually above 100 patients, and the referral criteria is generally below 25-29 mL/min/1.73 m2 of glomerular filtration. CONCLUSIONS: This work constitutes a first proposal of quality standards for the operation of UERCA in Spain. The definition of these standards has made it possible to establish the bases for the standardization of the organization of UERCA, and to subsequently work on the configuration of a standards manual for the accreditation of ERCA Units.

Urological surgery during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Descriptive analysis of the experience in a Urology Department across the pandemic phases. / Cirugía urológica durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Análisis descriptivo de la experiencia en un Servicio de Urología durante distintas fases epidemiológicas.

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has changed the urological practice around the world. Our objective is to describe the outcomes presented by patients undergoing surgery in the urology department of a tertiary hospital, across the pandemic phases. METHODS: Observational, cohort study including all patients undergoing surgery from March 1 to May 14. According to the hospital organization, we identified three periods: there were no changes during the first two weeks (1st. period), the following seven weeks, when only urgent interventions were carried out after performance of nasopharyngeal swab test (2nd. period), and finally, elective surgery was resumed on May 4, after the implementation of a multidisciplinary screening protocol (3rd. period). Demographic, baseline, surgical and perioperative variables, as well as postoperative outcomes, were obtained in a retrospective (periods 1 and 2) and prospective (period 3) manner. Telephone follow-up was initiated at least 3 weeks after hospital discharge. RESULTS: 103 urological surgeries were performed, and 11 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 8 of them within the 1st. PERIOD: The diagnosis was already known in 1 patient, while the other 10 developed the disease in an average of 25 days after the intervention and 16,6 days after discharge. Of seven transplant patients, four got the infection. Three deaths were recorded due to the disease: a 69-year-old woman transplanted and two men over 80 with comorbidities and high anesthetic risk who underwent drainage of retroperitoneal abscess and retrograde intrarenal surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection mainly affected renal transplant recipients or elderly patients with high anesthetic risk, during the first 2 weeks of the pandemic. After implementing preoperative PCR tests and a comprehensive screening protocol, cases were substantially reduced, and safe surgical procedures were achieved.

Pandemia COVID-19: impacto y reacción rápida de la Urología / COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact and rapid reaction of Urology

La pandemia COVID-19 causada por el virus SARS-CoV-2 ha ocasionado decenas de miles de muertos en España y logrado colapsar los hospitales de la red sanitaria en la Comunidad de Madrid, debido en gran parte a su particular tendencia a causar neumonías graves con necesidad de soporte ventilatorio. Este hecho ha ocasionado el colapso de nuestro centro, llegando a tener una ocupación del 130% de sus camas por enfermos COVID-19, y causando por tanto el cese absoluto de actividad del servicio de urología, la práctica desaparición de la docencia de los residentes y la incorporación de buena parte de la plantilla de urología al grupo de personal médico que atiende a estos pacientes. Para la recuperación de esta elevada cantidad de actividad suspendida será necesaria una priorización de la patología en base a criterios puramente clínicos, para la cual se proponen tablas que recogen la relevancia de cada patología dentro de cada área de la urología. Herramientas brindadas por la tecnología como la formación online o los simuladores quirúrgicos podrán ser útiles para la necesaria restitución de la formación de residentes

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused tens of thousands of deaths in Spain and has managed to breakdown the healthcare system hospitals in the Community of Madrid, largely due to its tendency to cause severe pneumonia, requiring ventilatory support. This fact has caused our center to collapse, with 130% of its beds occupied by COVID-19 patients, thus causing the absolute cessation of activity of the urology service, the practical disappearance of resident training programs, and the incorporation of a good part of the urology staff into the group of medical personnel attending these patients. In order to recover from this extraordinary level of suspended activity, we will be obliged to prioritize pathologies based on purely clinical criteria, for which tables including the relevance of each pathology within each area of urology are being proposed. Technology tools such as online training courses or surgical simulators may be convenient for the necessary reestablishment of resident education

[COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact and rapid reaction of Urology]. / Pandemia COVID-19: impacto y reacción rápida de la Urología.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused tens of thousands of deaths in Spain and has managed to breakdown the healthcare system hospitals in the Community of Madrid, largely due to its tendency to cause severe pneumonia, requiring ventilatory support. This fact has caused our center to collapse, with 130% of its beds occupied by COVID-19 patients, thus causing the absolute cessation of activity of the urology service, the practical disappearance of resident training programs, and the incorporation of a good part of the urology staff into the group of medical personnel attending these patients. In order to recover from this extraordinary level of suspended activity, we will be obliged to prioritize pathologies based on purely clinical criteria, for which tables including the relevance of each pathology within each area of urology are being proposed. Technology tools such as online training courses or surgical simulators may be convenient for the necessary reestablishment of resident education.

El impacto de la pandemia del COVID-19 en la utilización de los servicios urológicos de urgencias / The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the utilization of emergency urological services

OBJETIVOS: Comparar el número de pacientes que acuden al Servicio de Urología del Centro Hospitalario Universitario de Oporto (CHUP), así como sus características demográficas, los motivos de ingreso, la gravedad clínica según el sistema de triaje de Manchester (MTS) y la necesidad de cirugía de urgencia u hospitalización, durante la pandemia y el período equivalente en 2019. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se recogieron datos de pacientes que acudieron al servicio de urgencias de Urología del CHUP durante tres semanas -del 11 de marzo de 2020 al 1 de abril de 2020 -y del mismo período del año anterior (del 11 de marzo al 1 de abril de 2019). Los resultados: Durante la pandemia, el número de visitas a nuestro servicio de urgencias de urología se redujo en un 46,4% (122 vs 263). No hubo diferencias considerables en la media de edad ni en el número de pacientes de la tercera edad (con 65 años o más) entre los dos períodos. Sin embargo, un número significativamente menor de pacientes femeninos acudió al servicio de urgencia durante el período de la pandemia COVID-19 (32,7% vs.14,8%, p < 0,05). No se observaron diferencias significativas entre los distintos grupos de gravedad clínica en el marco del MTS. En2019, un número significativamente menor de pacientes requirió hospitalización. Las razones más comunes de admisión, durante ambos períodos, fueron hematuria, cólico renal e infecciones del tracto urinario (ITU). Los autores reconocen que el estudio tienevarias limitaciones, a saber, las inherentes a su carácter retrospectivo. CONCLUSIÓN: COVID-19 influyó significativamente en la actitud al solicitar atención urológica. Con base en los resultados de este estudio, tenemos razones para especular que las necesidades de las personas en materia de servicios urológicos podrían crecer de forma explosiva en el período posterior a COVID-19. Se requieren más estudios sobre el estado real de los servicios urológicos a largo plazo y las consecuencias que esta pandemiapuede tener en términos de tasas morbilidad y mortalidad indirectamente relacionadas con el virus

OBJECTIVES: To compare the number of patients attending the Urology ED of Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP), as well as their demographic characteristics, the reasons for admission, the clinical severity under the Manchester triage system (MTS), and the need for emergency surgery or hospitalization, during the pandemic and the equivalent period in 2019. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from patients attending the Urology emergency ward of CHUP during three weeks -from March 11th 2020 to April 1st2020 -and from the same period the previous year (from March 11thto April 1st2019). RESULTS: During the pandemic, 46.4% fewer patients visited our urological ED (122 vs 263). There was no significant difference of the mean age or the number of old patients (with 65 or more years old) between the two periods. However, significantly fewer female patients sought emergency urological services during the COVID-19 pandemic period (32.7% vs.14.8%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were noted between different clinical severity groups under the MTS. In 2019, significantly less patients required hospitalization. The most common reasons for admission, during both periods, were hematuria, renal colic and urinary tract infections (UTI). The authors recognize that the study has several limitations, namely, those inherent to its retrospective nature. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 significantly influenced people's urological care-seeking behaviour. Based on the results of this study, we have reasons to speculate that people's requirements for urological services might grow explosively in the post-COVID-19 period. There should be further studies about the real state of long-term urological services and the consequences that this pandemic may have in terms of morbimortality not directly related to the virus

Síndrome de dolor vesical: prevalencia y práctica clínica habitual en mujeres que acuden a Unidades de Urología Funcional y Urodinámica en España / Bladder pain syndrome: Prevalence and routine clinical practice in women attending functional urology and urodynamics units in Spain

Introducción y objetivos: El síndrome de dolor vesical (SDV) está catologado como enfermedad rara y su diagnóstico representa un desafío debido al solapamiento de sus síntomas con los asociados al síndrome de vejiga hiperactiva. El objetivo fue estimar la prevalencia del SDV y conocer el perfil de síntomas y la práctica clínica en pacientes que acuden a unidades de Urología Funcional y Urodinámica. Material y métodos: Estudio epidemiológico en el cual participaron 37 unidades de Urología Funcional y Urodinámica de España. La prevalencia se estudió considerando ambos sexos. Se evaluó la práctica clínica en 319 mujeres con SDV (nuevo diagnóstico o en revisión). Se recogieron retrospectivamente datos clínicos y sociodemográficos. Se analizaron los resultados de análisis de orina, cistoscopia, biopsia, exploración física, diario miccional, así como de los 4 cuestionarios disponibles: Patient Perception of Bladder Condition; Bladder Pain/Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score; EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5L y Patient Global Impression of Severity. Resultados: El 5,4% (503) de los pacientes que acudieron a estas unidades (9.312) tenían diagnóstico de SDV (90% [453] mujeres). Las pruebas más realizadas según historia clínica y anamnesis fueron: análisis de orina, ecografía vesical y cistoscopia. Los síntomas/comorbilidades más frecuentes fueron: dolor en la región vesical, frecuencia miccional aumentada, nicturia, ansiedad y depresión. La evaluación diagnóstica determinó dolor en hidrodistensión (86,9%), biopsia positiva (59,2%), dolor miofascial pélvico (28,4%), fenotipo urológico (97,8%) y frecuencia miccional aumentada (88,7%). Los cuestionarios reflejaron el elevado grado de afectación de la calidad de vida de estos pacientes. Conclusiones: La prevalencia del SDV en las unidades de Urología Funcional y Urodinámica en España es baja. No se observa homogeneidad en cuanto al diagnóstico entre los diferentes centros participantes. Por ello, sería necesario establecer una metodología común de manejo de pacientes con SDV en estas unidades, con herramientas específicas para esta patología

Introduction and objectives: Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is classified as a rare chronic debilitating disease and its diagnosis presents a challenge because its symptoms overlap with those associated with overactive bladder syndrome. The aim of the routine study was to estimate the prevalence of BPS and discover to study the profile of symptoms and clinical practice for patients attending functional urology and urodynamics units. Material and methods: An epidemiological study in which 37 functional urology and urodynamics units in Spain participated. The prevalence was studied in both sexes. Clinical practice was evaluated for 319 women with BPS (new diagnosis or under review). Clinical and sociodemographic data were collected retrospectively. The results were studied of urine tests, cystoscopy, biopsy, physical examination, bladder diary, and those of the four available questionnaires: Patient Perception of Bladder Condition; Bladder Pain/Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score; EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5L and Patient Global Impression of Severity. Results: Five point four percent (503) of the patients who attended these units (9,312) had a diagnosis of BPS (90% [453] females). The tests that were performed most according to the clinical history and anamnesis were: urine test, bladder ultrasound and cystoscopy. The most common symptoms/comorbidities were: pain in the bladder region, increased urinary frequency, nocturia, anxiety and depression. Diagnostic assessment determined pain on hydrodistension (86.9%), positive biopsy (59.2%), myofascial pelvic pain (28.4%), urological phenotype (97.8%), and increased urinary frequency (88.7%). The questionnaires reflected how much the quality of life of these patients was affected. Conclusions: The prevalence of BPS in functional urology and urodynamics units in Spain is low. No homogeneity was observed in terms of diagnosis between the different participating centres. Therefore, a common methodology is required for the management of patients with BPS in these units, with tools specific to this disorder

Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology Department.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitals are dealing with patients who may have clinical discharge but cannot return to their home due to non-medical issues. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of all the cases referred to the Integrated Care Network during the year 2016. Evaluation of waiting times, typology, reason for referral and clinical parameters. IBM SPSS 24.0 software was used for all statisticalanalyses. RESULTS: In the evaluated period, 2294 patients were discharged from our department. Of these, 55 were referred to Integrated Care Network. The mean length of hospitalization of the patients referred to the network was 20.6 ± 11.4 days, and the mean overall length of hospital stay in the period analyzed was 4.8 ± 0.9 days. The mean time between hospitalization and referral for continuing care was 10.7 ± 7.2 days. The time between referral and discharge of the hospital was 10.0 ± 8.7 days. Thirty-nine (70.9%) patients were hospitalized for oncological diseases. The most common referral was to Palliative Care units (n = 16; 29.1%). Patients referred to Palliative Care units showed the largest waiting times between the referral for the network and the hospital discharge, 12.2 ± 10.51 days. We observed 289 hospitalization days with patients who had no need of specialized urological care. DISCUSSION: In order to reduce time between referral to the network and hospital discharge, there is a need for enhanced cooperation and coordination among doctors, nurses and social workers. CONCLUSION: Early identification by physicians and nurses of patients who will require care after discharge will provide a better response from social workers and increased hospital performance.

Introdução: Os hospitais deparam-se cada vez mais com doentes que, tendo alta clínica, não têm condições de ordem não clínica para regressar imediatamente ao domicílio. Material e Métodos: Estudo transversal dos casos referenciados para a Rede Nacional de Cuidados Continuados Integrados durante o ano de 2016 no nosso Serviço de Urologia. Foram avaliados os tempos de espera, tipologia, motivo de referenciação e os parâmetros clínicos. Análise estatística realizada com recurso ao software IBM SPSS 24.0. Resultados: No período analisado, 2294 pacientes tiveram alta hospitalar no nosso serviço. Destes, 55 foram referenciados para a Rede Nacional de Cuidados Continuados Integrados. O tempo médio de internamento dos pacientes referenciados foi de 20,6 ± 11,4 dias enquanto o tempo médio global de internamento foi de 4,8 ± 0,9 dias. O tempo médio entre o internamento e a referenciação para a Rede Nacional de Cuidados Continuados Integrados foi de 10,7 ± 7,2 dias. O tempo entre a referenciação e a alta hospitalar foi de 10,0 ± 8,7 dias. Trinta e nove (70,9%) pacientes foram internados por patologias oncológicas. A referenciação mais frequente foi para unidades de cuidados paliativos (n = 16; 29,1%). Os pacientes referenciados para cuidados paliativos foram os que apresentaram os maiores tempos de espera entre a referenciação e a alta hospitalar efetiva, 12,2 ± 10,51 dias. Foram despendidos 289 dias de hospitalização com pacientes que não precisavam de cuidados urológicos especializados. Discussão: Para que o tempo entre a referenciação para a Rede Nacional de Cuidados Continuados Integrados e a alta hospitalar sejam diminuídos, é necessário que haja uma otimização da cooperação e coordenação entre médicos, enfermeiros e assistentes sociais. Conclusão: A identificação precoce dos doentes que necessitarão de apoio após a alta clínica permitirá uma resposta mais atempada por parte dos assistentes sociais e uma consequente melhoria do desempenho dos serviços hospitalares e satisfação dos doentes.

Basic patient characteristics predict antimicrobial resistance in E. coli from urinary tract specimens: a retrospective cohort analysis of 5246 urine samples.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance data from surveillance networks are frequently do not accurately predict resistance patterns of urinary tract infections at the bedside. OJECTIVE: To determine simple patient- and institution-related risk factors affecting antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli urine isolates. METHODS: From January 2012 to May 2015 all consecutive urine samples with significant growth of E. coli (≥103 CFU/ml) obtained from a tertiary care hospital were analysed for antimicrobial susceptibility and related to basic clinical data such a patient age, ward, sample type (catheter vs non-catheter urine). RESULTS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was available for 5246 E. coli urine isolates from 4870 patients. E. coli was most commonly resistant to amoxicillin (43.1%), cotrimoxazole (24.5%) and ciprofloxacin (17.4%). Resistance rates were low for meropenem (0.0%), fosfomycin (0.9%) and nitrofurantoin (1.5%). Significantly higher rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin (32.8 vs 15.8%) and cotrimoxazole (30.6 vs 23.9%) were found in urological patients compared with patients on other wards (p <0.01). In multivariable analysis, predictors for E. coli resistance against ciprofloxacin and cotrimoxazole were: treatment in the urological unit (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-2.54; p <0.001 and OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07-1.64; p = 0.010, respectively), male sex (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.630-2.29; p <0.001 and OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.22-1.04; p = 0.015), and only to a lesser extent urine samples obtained from indwelling catheters (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.61; p = 0.014 and OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.53; p = 0.020). Age ≥65 years was associated with higher resistance to ciprofloxacin (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.21-1.67; p <0.001), but lower resistance to cotrimoxazole (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86; p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Simple bedside patient data such as age, sex and treating hospital unit help to predict antimicrobial resistance and can improve the empirical treatment of urinary tract infections.

Review of evidence on handling hazardous drugs and Products in Urology Services; consensus document between the Spanish Urology Association and the Spanish Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

OBJECTIVE: The intravesical administration of hazardous drug products is a  standard practice in the urology setting, which potentially exposing medical  personnel to these drug products. It was deemed necessary to have a consensus document among the scientific societies involved (the Spanish Urological  Association and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy) that collects the best  available evidence on the safest handling possible of dangerous drug products in the setting of urology departments. METHOD: We reviewed the legislation and recommendations on the handling of  dangerous drug products, both at the national and international level. RESULTS: There is national legislation and regulations for protecting workers who  handle dangerous drugs and products, as well as  recommendations for handling to protect both the product and workers. DISCUSSION: Following the strategic lines of the European Parliament for 2014- 2020 in the chapter on occupational safety and health, the Spanish Urological  Association and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy proposed a series of  actions that decrease the risks of exposure for practitioners and caregivers  involved in the handling of these products. CONCLUSIONS: After this review, 19 recommendations were established for  handling dangerous drug products, which can be summarised as the need to  train all individuals involved (from management teams to patients and  caregivers), adopt systems that prevent contaminating leaks, implement  exposure surveillance programmes and optimise available resources.

Objetivo: La administración intravesical de medicamentos peligrosos es una  práctica habitual en el ámbito de la urología, con posible exposición del personal  sanitario a dichos medicamentos. Se considera necesario disponer de un  documento de consenso entre las sociedades científicas implicadas ­Asociación  Española de Urología y Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria­ que recoja la mejor evidencia disponible para el manejo, de la forma más segura posible,  de medicamentos peligrosos en el ámbito de los servicios de Urología.Método: Se ha realizado una revisión de la legislación y de las recomendaciones sobre el manejo de medicamentos peligrosos tanto a nivel estatal como internacional.Resultados: Se dispone de legislación nacional y de normativas para la  protección de los trabajadores que manipulen medicamentos y productos peligrosos, así como recomendaciones de manipulación para la protección tanto del producto, como de los trabajadores.Discusión: Siguiendo las líneas estratégicas del Parlamento Europeo para el  período 2014-2020 en el capítulo de seguridad y salud laboral, la Asociación Española de Urología y la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria proponen una serie de actuaciones que hagan disminuir los riesgos de exposición de los profesionales y cuidadores implicados en su manejo. Conclusiones: Tras esta revisión se establecen 19 recomendaciones para el  manejo de medicamentos peligrosos que pueden resumirse en la necesidad de  formación de todas las personas implicadas (desde los equipos directivos hasta  los pacientes y cuidadores), la adopción de sistemas que no permitan fugas  contaminantes, programas de vigilancia de las exposiciones y optimización de  los recursos disponibles.

Revisión bibliográfica sobre transmisibilidad cruzada de microorgranismos multirresistentes en un servicio de hospitalización urológico / No disponible

Las infecciones nosocomiales son responsables de hasta el 60% de los efectos adversos hospitalarios, ocasionando un elevado coste para el sistema sanitario. Las competencias enfermeras en su vigilancia y control son claras, siendo significativa nuestra responsabilidad en la contención de las trasmisiones cruzadas, por lo que es importante conocer tanto la situación actual del problema en nuestro entorno como las características particulares de los microorganismos responsables más frecuentes en un servicio de urología. Para ello se ha realizado una revisión bibliográfica en las bases de datos científicas PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Plus, ScienceDirect y Cuiden Plus, complementada con una búsqueda manual específica y una consulta de la base de datos de tesis doctorales (TESEO) del Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, recuperando un total de 1.278 documentos

The hospitalary infections are responsible of up to 60% of the adverse hospita effects, causing a high cost for the sanitary system. The competence nurses in his vigilance and control are clear, being significant our responsibility in the containment of the crossed transmissions, for what it is important to know so much the current situation of the problem in our environment, as the particular characteristics of the responsible, more frequent microorganisms in a service of urology. For it a bibliographical review has been realized in the scientific databases PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Plus, ScienceDirect and Cuiden Plus, complemented with a manual specific search and a consultation of the database of Doctoral Theses (TESEO) of the Department of Education, Culture and Sport, recovering a total of 1,278 documents

Beneath the tip of the iceberg: using electronic referrals to map the unquantified burden of clinical activity in a urology service.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to inform health policy by demonstrating the benefits of an electronic referral (e-referral) system to study inpatient referrals to urology departments. METHODS: London North West Healthcare NHS Trust has over 800 beds and several secondary and tertiary care services. In January 2014, we designed an e-referral form to requisition urology input for in-patients using the Integrated Clinical Environment™ (ICE) platform. We retrospectively reviewed e-referral records from February to December 2014 for patient demography, the referring service and disease groups triggering a referral. RESULTS: There were 1192 referrals. There was a median of 107 e-referrals per month (IQR 97-123, range 91-132) and 4 per day (IQR 2-6, range 0-12). Weekend e-referrals were 127 (median 1, IQR 0-2, range 0-5) with 1065 e-referrals on weekdays (median 4, IQR 3-6, range 0-12). A total of 848 (71.1 %) patients were male, and 344 (28.9 %) were female. Patients' mean age was 63 (SD 21) years. Almost half (550, 46 %) were acute referrals. Amongst the acute referrals, the majority (466, 84.7 %) arose from A&E. From the non-acute conditions, 381 (59.3 %) patients were from the medical specialities and 246 (38.3 %) from surgical disciplines. The three largest disease categories were urolithiasis (287, 24.1 %), haematuria (185, 15.5 %) and for ex-catheterisation (102, 8.6 %). A qualitative review showed the strengths and weaknesses of the system, enabling improvements in operational efficiency. CONCLUSION: An e-referral system monitors activity accurately. Systemic improvement in referral pathways would lead to better patient care and enable services to factor in the unseen component of workload and prompt realistic staffing.

A novel rapid access testicular cancer clinic: prospective evaluation after one year.

BACKGROUND: Our institution has recently developed a rapid access outpatient clinic to investigate men with testicular lumps and/or pain suspicious for testicular cancer (TCa). AIMS: To present our experience after 12 months. METHODS: All referrals to the rapid access testicular clinic (RATC) clinic were prospectively analysed from 01/01/2013 to 01/01/2014. The primary outcome variable was incidence of TCa in the referred patient cohort. Secondary outcome variables were waiting times prior to clinical review and waiting times prior to radical orchidectomy in patients diagnosed with TCa. RESULTS: Seventy-four new patients were referred to the RATC during the 1-year period and the mean age was 34 (range 15-81 years). TCa was the most common diagnosis and was found in 18 (25 %) patients. Patients diagnosed with TCa underwent radical orchidectomy, a median of 3 (range 1-5) days after their initial GP referral. Patients requiring surgical intervention for benign scrotal pathology underwent their procedure a median of 32 (range 3-61) days after their initial referral. Of the 18 patients diagnosed with TCa, 9 (50 %) were diagnosed with a seminomatous germ cell tumour on histopathology. CONCLUSION: The RATC is a new initiative in Ireland that provides expedient and definitive treatment of patients with newly diagnosed TCa. Early treatment will ultimately improve long-term prognosis in this patient cohort.