Biochemical markers of iron status and iron accumulation in peritoneal dialysis patients treated with ferric citrate.

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphataemia is a common complication of kidney disease. Current dialysis techniques do not provide enough phosphorus clearance, hence the need to use phosphorus binders. Treatment options include calcium carbonate, calcium acetate, lanthanum carbonate, sevelamer hydrochloride and iron-based binders. Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) with sustained elevated ferritin levels exceeding 800 ng/mL are at a higher risk of death. We identify PD patients treated with iron-based binders and compare ferritin and risk of iron accumulation to patients treated with non-iron-based binders. METHODS: All records of patients receiving PD at Emory dialysis centres until 30 October 2021 were reviewed for phosphorus binders. Basic demographics and laboratory data were time-referenced to the days on treatment with a particular binder. Patients were followed until discontinuation of the phosphorus binder, death, transplant, transfer to another dialysis provider or censoring at 36 months after medication was started. RESULTS: Compared to calcium acetate and sevelamer, ferric citrate utilisation in PD patients resulted in a sustained increase in ferritin. The proportion of patients with a ferritin equal to or greater than 800 ng/dL and transferrin saturation greater than 40% increased over time in patients treated with ferric citrate and was higher during the second and third year of follow-up compared to baseline values and to patients treated with calcium acetate or sevelamer. Two patients (7%) treated with ferric citrate developed clinically significant haemosiderosis. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ferric citrated in PD resulted in significant iron accumulation as judged by ferritin levels.

Elucidating the glucose-lowering effect of the bile acid sequestrant sevelamer.

AIM: Bile acid sequestrants are cholesterol-lowering drugs, which also improve glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. The mechanism behind the glucose-lowering effect is unknown but has been proposed to be mediated by increased glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion. Here, we investigated the glucose-lowering effects of sevelamer including any contribution from GLP-1 in people with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 15 people with type 2 diabetes on metformin monotherapy underwent two 17-day treatment periods with the bile acid sequestrant sevelamer and placebo, respectively, in a randomized order and with an interposed wash-out period of minimum 6 weeks. On days 15 and 17 of each treatment period, participants underwent experimental days with 4-h liquid meal tests and application of concomitant infusion of exendin(9-39)NH2 or saline. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, sevelamer improved insulin sensitivity (assessed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance) and beta-cell sensitivity to glucose and lowered fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations. In both treatment periods, exendin(9-39)NH2 increased postprandial glucose excursions compared with saline but without absolute or relative difference between the two treatment periods. In contrast, exendin(9-39)NH2 abolished the sevelamer-induced improvement in beta-cell glucose sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The bile acid sequestrant sevelamer improved insulin sensitivity and beta-cell sensitivity to glucose, but using the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2 we were not able to detect a GLP-1-mediated glucose-lowering effect of sevelamer in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Nevertheless, the sevelamer-induced improvement of beta-cell sensitivity to glucose was shown to be GLP-1-dependent.

Progress in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in renal failure.

INTRODUCTION: Among the clinical and metabolic complications of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), CKD-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality. While overt and persistent hyperphosphatemia is typical of advanced CKD and requires treatment, other abnormalities of calcium/phosphate metabolism begin to occur since the early stages of the disease. AREAS COVERED: We searched on the PubMed database, without restrictions for language or time range, for randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating phosphate-lowering therapies. The various phosphate binders show different safety profiles and diverse effects on calcium/phosphate metabolism and vascular calcification. The in-depth knowledge of the characteristics of these drugs is crucial to ensure adequate treatment to CKD patients. EXPERT OPINION: A proper control of serum phosphate can be achieved using phosphate binders. These medications may induce side effects. Moreover, data on their impact on clinical outcomes are partly controversial or scarce, especially for the new generation drugs. Hyperphosphatemia favors cardiovascular disease and increases the risk for CKD progression. These effects are partially mediated by fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a phosphaturic hormone that raises to maintain normal serum phosphate. Since there are no data supporting the use of phosphate-lowering agents when phosphataemia is normal, a key role is played by reducing dietary phosphate intake with the aim to control serum phosphate and the compensatory FGF23 and parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The progressive reduction in renal function, a condition known as chronic kidney disease (CKD), is characterized by several clinical and metabolic complications. Among them are the alterations of calcium and phosphorous metabolism that are part of the so-called CKD-MBD (chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder) and contribute to increase morbidity and mortality, especially due to vascular calcification. Persistent hyperphosphatemia is typical of advanced CKD but other abnormalities occur earlier to maintain normal serum calcium and phosphorus levels. These compensatory mechanisms are also involved in the pathophysiology of CKD-MBD and should be counteracted to improve clinical outcomes of CKD patients. Given the crucial role of hyperphosphatemia, numerous therapeutic strategies have been developed over time to help maintain phosphate serum levels within the normal range and prevent or treat CKD-MBD and its consequences. Phosphate binders act by binding dietary phosphate in the gastrointestinal lumen to prevent its absorption. According to their molecular structure, these drugs can be classified into calcium-based (calcium carbonate, calcium acetate), non-calcium-containing (sevelamer carbonate, sevelamer hydrochloride, lanthanum carbonate), aluminum-containing (aluminum hydroxide), and iron-based (sucroferric oxyhydroxide, ferric citrate) compounds. The various phosphate binders show different safety profiles and diverse effects on calcium/phosphate metabolism and vascular calcification. Despite the ability of hyperphosphatemia to favor CKD-MBD development and cardiovascular risk, there are no data supporting the use of phosphate-lowering agents when serum phosphate is normal also due to the potential adverse effects of long-term therapies. Accordingly, a key role is played by reducing dietary phosphate overload since the first stages of CKD.

The Role of Iron-Based Phosphate Binder in the Treatment of Hyperphosphatemia.

Hyperphosphatemia is a well-known complication of kidney disease. Phosphate binders are a mainstay treatment, but despite the existence of several phosphate binders, there is no one best approach to manage hyperphosphatemia. Phosphate binders are calcium-based, non-calcium- based, and others. While calcium-based phosphate binders are used frequently, they may cause hypercalcemia. Conversely, lanthanum carbonate and sevelamer were not linked to hypercalcemia but are costlier. The most recently developed class of phosphate binders is the ironbased ferric citrate and sucroferric oxyhydroxide. These have an important role in controlling phosphate levels due to their ability to lower the phosphate while concurrently providing iron sources. This review provides pharmacological profiles of different phosphate binders and their clinical usages, and further elaborates on their place in hyperphosphatemia management.

Real-World Phosphate Binder Use among Dialysis-Dependent Patients with CKD.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the need for phosphate binder (PB) treatment peaks at onset of dialysis. This real-world study assessed rates of PB utilization and switching in patients with dialysis-dependent CKD (DD-CKD). METHODS: We identified patients with PB utilization among those with prevalent DD-CKD using 2018-2019 Medicare Parts A/B/D data. Patients were assigned to cohorts based on primary (most frequently used) PB among calcium acetate, ferric citrate, lanthanum carbonate, sevelamer (hydrochloride and carbonate), sucroferric oxyhydroxide. We measured proportion of patients who were adherent (proportion of days covered >80%) and persistent (patients whose last 90 days of outpatient dialysis reported PB use). Net switching rates were calculated as the difference between switches to and from the primary agent. RESULTS: We identified 136,912 patients with PB use. Proportion of patients adherent ranged from 63.8% (lanthanum carbonate) to 67.7% (sevelamer) and persistent from 85.1% (calcium acetate) to 89.5% (ferric citrate). Most patients (73%) used the same PB throughout the study. Overall, 20.5% of patients experienced one switch and 2.3% two or more. Positive net switching rates were observed for ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and lanthanum carbonate (2-10%) but negative for sevelamer and calcium acetate (-2% to -7%). CONCLUSION: Adherence and persistence rates were low with slight variation across PBs. Net positive switching occurred for ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and lanthanum carbonate. Further studies are needed to determine the reasons for these findings and could identify opportunities for better control of phosphate levels among patients with CKD.

In vitro cytogenetic analysis of two different anti-phosphates (sevelamer hydrochloride and calcium carbonate) agents used by patients with hyperphosphatemia.

Sevelamer hydrochloride (SH) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) are two agents included in the phosphate-binding group which are frequently prescribed in the treatment of patients with hyperphosphatemia. However, there are no satisfactory studies on the genotoxic effects of SH in vitro. This study was conducted to reveal the genotoxic and/or cytotoxic potential of these two drugs in cultured human peripheral lymphocytes. Human peripheral lymphocytes were treated with SH and CaCO3 at sublethal concentrations for 24 or 48 h for micronucleus assay and 1 h in the comet assay. CaCO3 and SH stimulated a slight increase in micronucleus formation however this increase was not significant compared to the control group. According to the findings of the comet test, only one concentration of the SH caused significant DNA damage (2 mg/ml, 48 h) whereas CaCO3 did not cause important DNA breakage. No significant oxidative damage or anti-radical effect caused by test substances was observed on the pure pBR322 plasmid DNA in a cell-free medium. Also, it was found that the drugs were devoid of mutagenic activity in the Ames test, but had a weak cytotoxic effect. Both test substances, particularly SH, significantly reduced the nuclear division index compared to the control group. In conclusion, the cytotoxic effect of SH was evident on the basis of in vitro tests and slightly higher than CaCO3.

Effect of Calcium-based Phosphate Binders Versus Sevelamer on Mortality of Patients with Hemodialysis: A Meta-analysis.

Chronic kidney disease is a public health problem. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of sevelamer and calciumbased binders on mortality of hemodialysis patients. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for related articles published before May 14, 2020. We included six studies with 43330 participants, of which 21147 and 22183 received calciumbased phosphate binders and sevelamer, respectively. In the analysis of unadjusted data, sevelamer could lower cardiovascular mortality. When adjusted HRs was pooled, the cardiovascular mortality did not differ significantly in the sevelamer and calcium-based phosphate binders groups. Additionally, the all-cause mortality rate in sevelamer group was different from that in calcium-based phosphate binders group. However, sevelamer could not lower all-cause mortality in terms of the adjusted data. No significant difference was found in calcium and phosphorus between calcium-based phosphate binders and sevalmer. Sensitivity analysis showed that partial results of the study were inconsistent. There was no difference in the effect of sevelamer and calciumbased phosphate binders on the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with hemodialysis, after adjusting confounders. However, given the instability of the results, the results need to be further confirmed by a large sample and high quality RCTs.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.6814.

Sevelâmer para o tratamento da hiperfosfatemia em pacientes com doença renal crônica estágio 5D / Sevelamer for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with stage 5D chronic kidney disease

CONTEXTO: A doença renal crônica (DRC) é um problema de saúde pública crescente em todo o mundo, acompanhada de comorbidades muitas vezes mais graves do que a própria perda da função renal. Dentre elas, destacam-se os distúrbios do metabolismo ósseo e mineral (DMO), que levam à doença óssea e cardiovascular. Dessa forma, o DMO-DRC, além de poder resultar em fraturas, dor, deformidades ósseas e menor velocidade de crescimento nas crianças, também é fator de risco para calcificação vascular e associa-se a miocardiopatia e hipertrofia do ventrículo esquerdo, com consequente aumento do risco para doença cardíaca isquêmica, insuficiência cardíaca e morte de causa cardiovascular. Os mecanismos comuns entre a doença óssea e cardiovascular se apoiam nas crescentes evidências de que alterações na remodelação óssea favorecem o desenvolvimento de calcificações extra ósseas, principalmente vasculares. As alterações no metabolismo mineral e ósseo são frequentes na DRC, observadas já nos estágios iniciais da DRC, quando a taxa de filtração glomerular está em

Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Phosphate-Lowering Agents in Nondialysis CKD.

BACKGROUND: Benefits of phosphate-lowering interventions on clinical outcomes in patients with CKD are unclear; systematic reviews have predominantly involved patients on dialysis. This study aimed to summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning benefits and risks of noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering treatment in nondialysis CKD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of RCTs involving noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering therapy compared with placebo, calcium-based binders, or no study medication, in adults with CKD not on dialysis or post-transplant. RCTs had ≥3 months follow-up and outcomes included biomarkers of mineral metabolism, cardiovascular parameters, and adverse events. Outcomes were meta-analyzed using the Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects. Unstandardized mean differences were used as effect sizes for continuous outcomes with common measurement units and Hedge's g standardized mean differences (SMD) otherwise. Odds ratios were used for binary outcomes. Cochrane risk of bias and GRADE assessment determined the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: In total, 20 trials involving 2498 participants (median sample size 120, median follow-up 9 months) were eligible for inclusion. Overall, risk of bias was low. Compared with placebo, noncalcium-based phosphate binders reduced serum phosphate (12 trials, weighted mean difference -0.37; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.15 mg/dl, low certainty evidence) and urinary phosphate excretion (eight trials, SMD -0.61; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.31, low certainty evidence), but resulted in increased constipation (nine trials, log odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.83, low certainty evidence) and greater vascular calcification score (three trials, SMD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.77, very low certainty evidence). Data for effects of phosphate-lowering therapy on cardiovascular events (log OR, 0.51; 95% CI, -0.51 to 1.17) and death were scant. CONCLUSIONS: Noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering therapy reduced serum phosphate and urinary phosphate excretion, but there was an unclear effect on clinical outcomes and intermediate cardiovascular end points. Adequately powered RCTs are required to evaluate benefits and risks of phosphate-lowering therapy on patient-centered outcomes.

Gut Microbiome-Derived Uremic Toxin Levels in Hemodialysis Patients on Different Phosphate Binder Therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Constipation is prevalent in patients with kidney failure partly due to the use of medication, such as phosphate binders. We hypothesized that serum levels of gut microbiome-derived uremic toxins (UTOX) may be affected by the choice of phosphate binder putatively through its impact on colonic transit time. We investigated two commonly prescribed phosphate binders, sevelamer carbonate (SEV) and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFO), and their association with gut microbiome-derived UTOX levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: Weekly blood samples were collected from 16 anuric HD participants during the 5-week observational period. All participants were on active phosphate binder monotherapy with either SFO or SEV for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Eight UTOX (7 gut microbiome-derived) and tryptophan were quantified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Serum phosphorus, nutritional, and liver function markers were also measured. For each substance, weekly individual levels, the median concentration per participant, and differences between SFO and SEV groups were reported. Patient-reported bowel movements, by the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS), and pill usage were assessed weekly. RESULTS: The SEV group reported a 3.3-fold higher frequency of BSS stool types 1 and 2 (more likely constipated, p < 0.05), whereas the SFO group reported a 1.5-fold higher frequency of BSS stool types 5-7 (more likely loose stool and diarrhea, not significant). Participants in the SFO group showed a trend toward better adherence to phosphate binder therapy (SFO: 87.6% vs. SEV: 66.6%, not significant). UTOX, serum phosphorus, nutritional and liver function markers, and tryptophan were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the gut microbiome-derived UTOX levels between phosphate binders (SFO vs. SEV), despite SFO therapy resulting in fewer constipated participants. This pilot study may inform study design of future clinical trials and highlights the importance of including factors beyond bowel habits and their association with UTOX levels.

The impact of phosphate lowering agents on clinical and laboratory outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Besides reducing hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, phosphate lowering agents might provide beneficial effects on clinical and laboratory parameters. This meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively examine the impact of all phosphate lowering agents on various aspects of clinical and laboratory outcomes in CKD patients. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials until July 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the effects of each phosphate lowering agent with controls, comprising placebo and all other phosphate lowering agents. Various clinical and laboratory outcomes were analyzed. Random effects model was used to compute the standardized mean difference for continuous variables and the risk ratio (RR) for binary variables. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 127 RCTs with 20,215 patients. Sevelamer and lanthanum significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.610, 95% CI 0.401-0.929 and 0.467, 95% CI 0.337-0.647, respectively) but not cardiovascular (CV) mortality or CV events. Hospitalization rates were significantly diminished by sevelamer (RR 0.527; 95% CI 0.308-0.902). Certain phosphate lowering agents improved biochemical parameters including serum phosphate, calcium, coronary artery calcium scores, fibroblast growth factor-23, bone biomarkers, and lipid profiles. Intact parathyroid hormone and bone mineral density were not significantly changed. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to decreasing serum phosphate levels, various beneficial effects on clinical and laboratory parameters of phosphate lowering agents might play potential roles in diminishing morbidity and mortality in CKD patients.

Exploring co-dispensed drug use in patients on sevelamer or polystyrene sulfonate to identify potential novel binding interactions: a cross sectional in silico study : Potential novel binding interactions with resins.

Background Sevelamer and polystyrene sulfonate are used for treating hyperphosphatemia and hyperkalaemia in chronic kidney disease patients. Because of their binding properties, these resins potentially bind other drugs in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby decreasing their bioavailability and clinical effectiveness. Aim The aim of this study was to explore co-dispensed drug use in patients on sevelamer or polystyrene sulfonate to identify potential novel binding interactions. Method In this in silico study, the 100 drugs most frequently co-dispensed with sevelamer/polystyrene sulfonate in the period 2000-2018 were extracted from the University Groningen IADB.nl database. Drugs dispensed to < 5% of patients, drugs not orally administered, drugs administered once daily before bedtime and drugs for which information on binding interactions with sevelamer or polystyrene was already available were excluded. The likelihood of an interaction (yes or no) of the included drugs was assessed based on pKa- and Log P values. For sevelamer, drugs with a pKa (acid) between 1.5 and 7.4 and or a Log P value > 2.0 were identified as potential interacting drug. For polystyrene sulfonate, drugs with a pKa (base) > 1.5 were identified as potential interacting drug. Results Of the top 100 drugs most frequently co-dispensed with sevelamer/polystyrene sulfonate, 22 and 27 potentially clinically relevant new interacting drugs were identified for sevelamer and polystyrene sulfonate respectively. Conclusion Several potentially relevant novel binding interactions for sevelamer and polystyrene sulfonate were identified based on dispensing data and assessment of chemical properties for which further interaction research is warranted.

Effects of sevelamer carbonate versus calcium acetate on vascular calcification, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease.

Hyperphosphatemia is present in most patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. Phosphate binders (calcium-based and calcium free) are the mainstay pharmacologic treatment to lower phosphorus levels in patients with ESRD. We evaluated biochemical markers of vascular calcification, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated with sevelamer carbonate (SC) versus calcium acetate (CA). Fifty patients with CKD (stages 3 and 4) were enrolled and assigned to treatment with SC and CA for 12 weeks. At the end of the study the biomarkers of vascular calcification, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction were analyzed. A significant increase in HDL-cholesterol was observed with SC but not with CA in patients with CKD. Treatment with SC reduced serum phosphate, calcium phosphate, and FGF-23 levels and there was no change with CA treatment. The inflammatory markers IL-8, IFN-γ, and TNFα decreased with response to both treatments. The levels of IL-6 significantly increased with CA treatment and no change was observed in the SC treatment group. SC showed favorable effects on anti-inflammatory and vascular calcification biomarkers compared to CA treatment in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4 with normal phosphorous values.

Safety and effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of lanthanum carbonate (LC) versus calcium salts, non-LC phosphate binders (PBs), sevelamer, or placebo in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted up to 18 June 2021. Data acquisition and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the serum biochemical parameters, adverse events, and patient-level outcomes of LC, non-LC PBs, and sevelamer for hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed utilizing the I2 statistic and Q-test, and a random effect model was selected to calculate the pooled effect size. RESULTS: A total of 26 randomized, controlled trials and 3 observational studies were included. Compared to the other groups, better control effect of serum phosphorus (RR = 2.68, p < 0.001), reduction in serum phosphorus (95%CI = -1.93, -0.99; p < 0.001), Ca × P (95%CI = -13.89, -2.99; p = 0.002), serum intact parathyroid hormone levels (95%CI = -181.17, -3.96, p = 0.041) were found in LC group. Besides, reduced risk of various adverse effects, such as hypotension, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and a score of coronary artery calcification were identified with LC in comparison to calcium salt, non-LC PBs, or placebo group. Significantly lower risk in mortality with LC treatment vs. non-LC PBs was observed, while no significant difference was identified between LC and calcium salt groups. CONCLUSION: LC might be an alternative treatment for hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD considering its comprehensive curative effect.

The Rising Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and How it is Dealt with: A Review of Current and Potential Phosphate Binders (PB).

It is estimated that by 2040, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) will be the 5th main cause of global deaths. It has been suggested that hyperphosphatemia is among the main factors leading to the increased risk of death. This review focuses on potential and currently used Phosphate Binders (PB). Aluminum hydroxide is presently not recommended due to potential aluminum toxicity. Calciumcontaining phosphate binders (CCPB) can cause calcium overload, resulting in hypercalcemia and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Magnesium and calcium complexes were suggested to be as effective as sevelamer in the reduction of serum phosphate, with the potential to slow down the process of calcification. However, limited studies have been conducted in this area. Although sevelamer seemed to have a positive influence on cardiovascular calcification and arterial stiffness, its influence on mortality was unclear. Sevelamer crystal accumulation in the Gastrointestinal tract (GI) can cause gastrointestinal bleeding. Lanthanum carbonate seemed to lower all-cause mortality and reduce the chance of hypercalcemia, even though a deposit in the GI tract was observed. Colestilan, like sevelamer, reduced LDL cholesterol. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide had a lower pill burden than other PBs and it seemed to reduce serum FGF-23. Ferric citrate improved parameters that are related to anemia but can cause iron overload. Bixalomer appeared to have fewer gastrointestinal side effects than sevelamer. Nano-lanthanum hydroxide and SBR759 may have an interesting future as PBs. In conclusion, the development of new PBs should also take into consideration their potential to function as protection modifiers.

Phosphate Control: The Next Frontier in Dialysis Cardiovascular Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis. Mortality rates are still unacceptably high even though they have fallen in the past 2 decades. Hyperphosphatemia (elevated serum phosphate levels) is seen in almost all patients with advanced CKD and is by far the largest remaining modifiable contributor to CKD mortality. SUMMARY: Phosphate retention drives multiple physiological mechanisms linked to increased risk of CVD. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, both of which have been suggested to have direct pathogenic CV effects, increase in response to phosphate retention. Phosphate, calcium, and PTH levels are linked in a progressively worsening cycle. Maladaptive upregulation of phosphate absorption is also likely to occur further exacerbating hyperphosphatemia. Even higher phosphate levels within the normal range may be a risk factor for vascular calcification and, thus, CV morbidity and mortality. A greater degree of phosphate control is important to reduce the risk of CV morbidity and mortality. Improved phosphate control and regular monitoring of phosphate levels are guideline-recommended, established clinical practices. There are several challenges with the current phosphate management approaches in patients with CKD on dialysis. Dietary restriction of phosphate and thrice-weekly dialysis alone are insufficient/unreliable to reduce phosphate to <5.5 mg/dL. Even with the addition of phosphate binders, the only pharmacological treatment currently indicated for hyperphosphatemia, the majority of patients are unable to achieve and maintain phosphate levels <5.5 mg/dL (or more normal levels) [PhosLo® gelcaps (calcium acetate): 667 mg (prescribing information), 2011, VELPHORO®: (Sucroferric oxyhydroxide) (prescribing information), 2013, FOSRENAL®: (Lanthanum carbonate) (prescribing information), 2016, AURYXIA®: (Ferric citrate) tablets (prescribing information), 2017, RENVELA®: (Sevelamer carbonate) (prescribing information), 2020, RealWorld dynamix. Dialysis US: Spherix Global Insights, 2019]. Phosphate binders do not target the primary pathway of phosphate absorption (paracellular), have limited binding capacity, and bind nonspecifically [PhosLo® gelcaps (calcium acetate): 667 mg (prescribing information). 2013, VELPHORO®: (Sucroferric oxyhydroxide) (prescribing information), 2013, FOSRENAL®: (Lanthanum carbonate) (prescribing information), 2016, AURYXIA®: (Ferric citrate) tablets (prescribing information), 2017, RENVELA®: (Sevelamer carbonate) (prescribing information) 2020]. Key Messages: Despite current phosphate management strategies, most patients on dialysis are unable to consistently achieve target phosphate levels, indicating a need for therapeutic innovations [RealWorld dynamix. Dialysis US: Spherix Global Insights, 2019]. Given a growing evidence base that the dominant mechanism of phosphate absorption is the intestinal paracellular pathway, new therapies are investigating ways to reduce phosphate levels by blocking absorption through the paracellular pathway.

Familial hyperphosphatemic tumoral calcinosis in an unusual and usual sites and dramatic improvement with the treatment of acetazolamide, sevelamer and topical sodium thiosulfate.

OBJECTIVES: Familial hyperphosphatemic tumoral calcinosis is a rare disorder characterized by hyperphosphatemia with recurrent ectopic periarticular calcifications, in addition to other visceral and vascular manifestations, without any inflammatory or neoplastic disorder. The available treatment strategies are limited. Here we report an eight year old female patient with recurrent lesions under the chin, and bilateral hips which are painful and improving of the size of the lesions and hyperphosphatemia. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was started to the treatment with peroral acetazolamide however the lesion did not regress but a new lesion appeared then we added sevelamer and topical sodium thiosulfate treatment for three months. After the three months of the combination treatment the lesions, there were no pain, no hyperphospahtemia regression/disappearance of the lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This combination treatment or topical sodium thiosulfate use only may be a novel treatment strategy for the patients prospective controlled trials are needed.

A Randomized Trial of Tenapanor and Phosphate Binders as a Dual-Mechanism Treatment for Hyperphosphatemia in Patients on Maintenance Dialysis (AMPLIFY).

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. It is unknown whether combining two therapies with different mechanisms of action-tenapanor, an inhibitor of paracellular phosphate absorption, and phosphate binders-is safe and effective for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. METHODS: This double-blind phase 3 trial enrolled 236 patients undergoing maintenance dialysis with hyperphosphatemia (defined in this trial as serum phosphorus 5.5-10 mg/dl inclusive) despite receiving phosphate binder therapy (sevelamer, nonsevelamer, sevelamer plus nonsevelamer, or multiple nonsevelamer binders). These participants were randomly assigned to receive oral tenapanor 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline to week 4. RESULTS: Of the 236 randomized patients, 235 (99.6%) were included in the full analysis set; this included 116 in the tenapanor plus binder group and 119 in the placebo plus binder group. A total of 228 patients (96.6%) completed the 4-week treatment period. In the full analysis set (mean age 54.5 years, 40.9% women), patients treated with tenapanor plus binder achieved a larger mean change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline to week 4 compared with placebo plus binder (-0.84 versus -0.19 mg/dl, P<0.001). Diarrhea was the most commonly reported adverse event, resulting in study drug discontinuation in four of 119 (3.4%) and two of 116 (1.7%) patients receiving tenapanor plus binder or placebo plus binder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A dual-mechanism treatment using both tenapanor and phosphate binders improved control of hyperphosphatemia in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis compared with phosphate binders alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: AMPLIFY, NCT03824587.

Safety and feasibility of crushing sevelamer tablets for enteral feeding tube administration.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Sevelamer is an insoluble polymer indicated for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The package inserts for both tablet formulations recommend the tablets be administered whole. Due to whole tablets being sometimes inadvertently crushed and the significantly increased cost of sevelamer packets, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of crushed sevelamer tablets for enteral feeding tube administration. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective chart review was performed. All adult ICU patients prescribed sevelamer carbonate between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2019 were included if they received at least one dose of a sevelamer tablet or packet, whereas they had an enteral feeding tube in place. The primary outcome was the incidence of an obstructed enteral feeding tube or need for replacement, as defined as the number of occurrences over the total numbers of doses administered. The secondary outcome was the change in phosphorus levels from time of sevelamer initiation to discontinuation or patient discharge. RESULTS: A total of 14 obstructions were reported, four in the tablet arm and ten in the packet arm (0.4% tablet arm, 0.5% packet arm; P = .5931). Of these, four (29%) required tube replacement and were followed by sevelamer discontinuation. Two (14%) were documented to be due to increased tube feeds and esomeprazole. Six (43%) cases required tube replacement, but no issues arose upon continuation. Only one of the obstructions resulted in a recurrent tube occlusion. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Sevelamer tablets may be crushed and administered via enteral feeding tubes, provided clear instruction on tablet preparation is included. Oral administration in dysphagic patients requires further evaluation with clear protocols for preparation and administration.