RESUMEN
In 2018, a mass drug administration (MDA) campaign for malaria elimination was piloted in Haiti. The pilot treated 36,338 people with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and primaquine; no severe adverse events were detected. In 2020, another MDA campaign using the same medications was implemented to mitigate an upsurge in malaria cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Four cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) were identified among the 42,249 people who took the medications. Three of these individuals required hospitalization; all survived. In addition to SP ingestion, an investigation of potential causes for increased SJS cases identified that all four cases had human leukocyte antigens A*29 and/or B*44:03, another known risk factor for SJS. Additionally, three of the four case individuals had antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, and the fourth may have been exposed around the same time. These findings raise the possibility that recent SARS-CoV-2 infection may have contributed to the increased risk for SJS associated with SP exposure during the 2020 campaign.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , COVID-19 , Malaria , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Humanos , Primaquina/efectos adversos , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiología , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/epidemiología , Haití/epidemiología , Administración Masiva de Medicamentos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Pirimetamina/efectos adversos , Sulfadoxina/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & controlRESUMEN
In 2001, Peru changed its treatment policy for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria on the northern Pacific Coast to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine with atresunate (SP-AS). Because Peru was the first country in the Americas to adopt this combination therapy, we established a surveillance system in the region to assess the frequency of new or worsening symptoms after starting therapy. Over a period of two years, 1,552, or approximately two-thirds of all patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria who had received SP-AS on the northern coast were followed up. Of these, 8.8% reported at least one adverse effect, with the most common being vomiting, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, dizziness, and fever; no severe adverse effects related to SP-AS therapy were identified. Treatment of uncomplicated malaria with SP-AS was associated with a low frequency of mild adverse effects in Peru, and therefore should be considered as a first-line therapy in areas of the Americas where SP efficacy is still high.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Pirimetamina/uso terapéutico , Sulfadoxina/uso terapéutico , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Perú/epidemiología , Pirimetamina/administración & dosificación , Pirimetamina/efectos adversos , Sulfadoxina/administración & dosificación , Sulfadoxina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
To assist the Peruvian Ministry of Health in modifying the malaria treatment policy for their north Pacific coastal region, we conducted an in vivo efficacy trial of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and SP plus artesunate (SP-AS) for the treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum infections. A total of 197 patients were randomized to therapy with either SP (25 mg/kg of the sulfadoxine component in a single dose on day 0) or a combination of SP plus AS (4 mg/kg on days 0, 1, and 2) and were followed for 28 days for symptoms and recurrence of parasitemia. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed on enrollment with respect to age, sex, history of malaria, or geometric mean parasite density. A total of 185 subjects completed the 28-day follow-up. Of the 91 subjects treated with SP alone, two had recurrences of parasitemia on day 7 and one on day 21. Of the 94 subjects treated with SP-AS, one had a recurrence of parasitemia on day 21. Fever and asexual parasite density decreased significantly more rapidly and the proportion of patients with gametocytemia on days 3-28 was significantly lower in subjects treated with combination therapy than in those who received SP alone. No severe adverse drug reactions were observed; however, self-limited rash and pruritus were significantly more common and an exacerbation of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain were observed significantly more frequently among patients who had received SP-AS. These results have contributed to a National Malaria Control Program decision to change to SP-AS combination therapy as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in northern coastal Peru in November 2001, making Peru the first country in the Americas to recommend this combination therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimetamina/uso terapéutico , Sesquiterpenos/uso terapéutico , Sulfadoxina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Artemisininas/efectos adversos , Artesunato , Niño , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Perú , Pirimetamina/administración & dosificación , Pirimetamina/efectos adversos , Sesquiterpenos/administración & dosificación , Sesquiterpenos/efectos adversos , Sulfadoxina/administración & dosificación , Sulfadoxina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride (Malarone) were compared with chloroquine or pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine in patients with acute falciparum malaria in northern Peru. Patients were initially randomized to receive 1,000 mg atovaquone and 400 mg proguanil hydrochloride daily for 3 days (n=15) or 1,500 mg chloroquine (base) over a 3 day period (n=14) (phase 1). The cure rate with chloroquine was lower than expected and patients were subsequently randomized to receive a single dose of 75 mg pyrimethamine and 1,500 mg sulfadoxine (n=9) or atovaquone/proguanil as before (n=5) (phase 2). In phase 1, atovaquone/proguanil was significantly more effective than chloroquine (cure rate 100% [14/14] vs. 8% [1/13], P<0.0001). In phase 2, atovaquone/proguanil and pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine were both highly effective (cure rates 100% [5/5] and 100% [7/7]). There were no significant differences between treatment groups in parasite or fever clearance times. Adverse events were typical of malarial symptoms and did not differ significantly between groups. Overall efficacy of atovaquone/proguanil was 100% for treatment of acute falciparum malaria in a region with a high prevalence of chloroquine resistance.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Cloroquina/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Naftoquinonas/uso terapéutico , Proguanil/uso terapéutico , Pirimetamina/uso terapéutico , Sulfadoxina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Atovacuona , Cloroquina/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naftoquinonas/efectos adversos , Perú , Proguanil/efectos adversos , Pirimetamina/efectos adversos , Sulfadoxina/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Anfotericina B/efectos adversos , Paracoccidioides/inmunología , Paracoccidioides/aislamiento & purificación , Paracoccidioidomicosis/diagnóstico , Paracoccidioidomicosis/epidemiología , Sulfadiazina/administración & dosificación , Sulfadoxina/administración & dosificación , Sulfadoxina/efectos adversos , Sulfametoxazol/administración & dosificación , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Fluconazol/administración & dosificación , Fluconazol/efectos adversos , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Itraconazol/administración & dosificación , Itraconazol/efectos adversos , Paracoccidioidomicosis/etiología , Paracoccidioidomicosis/prevención & control , Paracoccidioidomicosis/transmisión , Signos en HomeopatíaRESUMEN
Pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine has been associated with severe and fatal cutaneous reactions as well as transient liver damage. We report the case of a patient who died of progressive hepatic failure caused by pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine administration. In addition, we summarize reports made to the Food and Drug Administration since 1982 that focus on hepatotoxic reactions to pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine. We suggest that fatal hepatic injury can occur after treatment with pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine and that physicians who prescribe the drug should be aware of this possibility.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas , Pirimetamina/efectos adversos , Sulfadoxina/efectos adversos , Sulfanilamidas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Dermatitis Exfoliativa/inducido químicamente , Combinación de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Ecuador , Femenino , Humanos , Hepatopatías/sangre , Hepatopatías/patología , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Malaria/prevención & control , Necrosis , ViajeRESUMEN
Fansimef is a combination of 250 mg mefloquine (base), 500 mg sulfadoxine, and 25 mg pyrimethamine per tablet. One hundred and fifty adult male Brazilian patients at Belém (Pará), who had peripheral blood smears positive for Plasmodium falciparum, with or without clinical symptoms of falciparum malaria, were treated in a double-blind randomized fashion with either one, two or three tablets of Fansimef. Of those receiving one tablet (48 patients), 81% were cured and 19% exhibited RI recrudescences. All the patients receiving two or three tablets of Fansimef (49 patients in each group) were cured. The rates of initial clearance of parasitaemia and fever were similar in all treatment groups. Tolerance was good at all dose levels. The main side-effects included nausea, vomiting, dizziness, diarrhoea and abdominal pain, but these were mild and transient and required no specific treatment. The incidence of vomiting and nausea was highest in patients given the three-tablet dose. The results of various haematological, biochemical and urine analyses were not adversely altered by the administration of Fansimef.