Optical coherence tomographic (OCT) evaluation of intraoral non-ablative erbium: YAG laser (SMOOTH mode) in rejuvenation of nasolabial folds; A prospective randomized split face comparative pilot study.

BACKGROUND: There are both few non-comparative studies investigating the efficacy of intraoral Er: YAG laser (SMOOTH mode) in rejuvenating nasolabial folds (NLFs) and lack of valid and objective wrinkles scales. In this prospective randomized split face comparative pilot study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of intraoral Er: YAG laser (SMOOTH MODE) compared with extraoral approach in rejuvenating NLFs using OCT as an objective evaluating tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty adult women with notable NLFs were randomized in this study. The patients received 5 monthly sessions of Er: YAG laser (SMOOTH mode) using intraoral approach on one side and extraoral approach on the other side. Outcome was evaluated 2 weeks and 4 months post-treatment by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), OCT, and patients' satisfaction. Side effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: Intraoral sides had significant increase in OCT evaluated dermal thickness at 4 months post-treatment (P = .03) without side effects compared with extraoral sides. Extraoral approach had significantly higher patients' satisfaction compared with intraoral approach at 2 weeks and 4 months post-treatment (P = .03, .02, respectively). Insignificant differences between both approaches were found regarding GAIS scoring, OCT evaluated epidermal thickness at 2 weeks and 4 months post-treatment, and OCT evaluated dermal thickness at 2 weeks post-treatment (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Intraoral Er: YAG laser (SMOOTH mode) is safer and more effective than extraoral approach in rejuvenating NLFs. OCT is a promising objective tool for evaluating facial wrinkles. Further studies are still needed.

Combination of Fractional Radiofrequency and Thermo-Contraction Systems for Facial Skin Rejuvenation: A Clinical and Histological Study.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency energy systems are popular options in the treatment of skin laxity and wrinkles. Fractional radiofrequency devices (FRFs) have increased the efficacy and safety. The thermo-contraction (TC) system is also a novel technology that can promote a marked lifting effect. OBJECTIVES: This trial was done to assess the safety and efficacy of a combination treatment using the FRF system and TC for facial skin rejuvenation. METHODS: Fifteen female volunteers (mean age, 47.07 ± 8.83 years) received 3 FRF and 6 TC bipolar treatments in 3 weeks. Assessment methods included wrinkle grading by independent investigator using Glogau wrinkle scoring, objective measurement of depth, area, and volume of right nasolabial fold (using the VisioFace CSI software), thickness and echo-density of the dermis (using high-frequency ultrasound), and measurement of the skin biophysical parameters before and 3 months after last treatment. Histological assessment was also performed on 5 volunteer participants. RESULTS: The clinical evaluation showed a significant improvement in Glogau wrinkle scoring after 3 months (P value, 0.041). The area and volume of nasolabial folds were also significantly reduced (P values, 0.026 and 0.031, respectively). Skin ultrasound showed a significant increase in echo-density of the dermis, which was confirmed by histological findings of an increase in dermal collagen content. Adverse reactions were all transient and mild in severity, and subjects were "moderately satisfied" with the treatment (Likert scale, 3.6 out of 5). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial showed that a combination therapy by FRF and TC bipolar systems is efficient and safe for facial skin rejuvenation.

Effect of subdermal 1,444-nm pulsed neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser on the nasolabial folds and cheek laxity.

BACKGROUND: Wrinkle formation usually accompanies skin aging. In particular, accentuated nasolabial folds and loss of elasticity are early signs of skin aging. The use of 1,444-nm pulsed neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers has increased in popularity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel 1,444-nm pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of NLF and cheek laxity using subdermal laser therapy. METHODS: Ten Korean patients with moderate to severe NLF were enrolled. Each received a single treatment session with a 1,444-nm Nd:YAG laser. Two blinded physicians evaluated clinical improvement by rating comparative photographs on a 5-point scale. Efficacy was also assessed by measuring elasticity and roughness. Skin biopsies were performed on five volunteers before treatment and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: The 1,444-nm Nd:YAG laser effectively promoted clinical improvement of NLF and cheek laxity (p < .05). Significant differences in elasticity and roughness were observed (p < .05). Epidermal proliferation was stimulated as demonstrated by increases in epidermal thickness and Ki-67 expression (p < .05). Quantitative image analyses of pre- and post-treatment biopsies revealed that collagen fibers increased from baseline (p > .05). Transforming growth factor beta and heat shock protein-70 messenger RNA levels quantified using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction increased significantly from baseline (p < .05). CONCLUSION: The 1,444-nm Nd:YAG laser is an effective treatment modality with minimal complications for the treatment of NLF and cheek laxity, but further research with a larger group of patients is needed to confirm these findings.

Combined treatment with a nonablative infrared device and hyaluronic acid filler does not have enhanced efficacy in treating nasolabial fold wrinkles.

BACKGROUND: Although hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are extensively used for the correction of facial wrinkles and folds, there is a limit to patient satisfaction, especially in patients with severe wrinkles. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential for synergistic effects with combined treatment using a nonablative infrared (IR) device and HA filler in the treatment of nasolabial fold (NLF) wrinkles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a split-face randomized study in which 12 Korean patients were treated with HA filler on both NLFs and with a nonablative IR device on the experimental side of the face. Clinical evaluations from subjects and investigators and photographs were obtained at baseline, just before and after the procedures, and 1 and 2 months after completion of the procedures. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between wrinkle severity and global aesthetic scores for HA gel implantation alone and HA gel with nonablative IR device treatment at any point. CONCLUSION: Combining the use of a nonablative IR device with HA filler does not appear to be superior to HA filler alone in the treatment of moderate to severe NLF wrinkles.