Training in the practice of noninvasive brain stimulation: Recommendations from an IFCN committee.

As the field of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) expands, there is a growing need for comprehensive guidelines on training practitioners in the safe and effective administration of NIBS techniques in their various research and clinical applications. This article provides recommendations on the structure and content of this training. Three different types of practitioners are considered (Technicians, Clinicians, and Scientists), to attempt to cover the range of education and responsibilities of practitioners in NIBS from the laboratory to the clinic. Basic or core competencies and more advanced knowledge and skills are discussed, and recommendations offered regarding didactic and practical curricular components. We encourage individual licensing and governing bodies to implement these guidelines.

Distributed source modeling of intracranial stereoelectro-encephalographic measurements.

Intracranial stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) provides unsurpassed sensitivity and specificity for human neurophysiology. However, functional mapping of brain functions has been limited because the implantations have sparse coverage and differ greatly across individuals. Here, we developed a distributed, anatomically realistic sEEG source-modeling approach for within- and between-subject analyses. In addition to intracranial event-related potentials (iERP), we estimated the sources of high broadband gamma activity (HBBG), a putative correlate of local neural firing. Our novel approach accounted for a significant portion of the variance of the sEEG measurements in leave-one-out cross-validation. After logarithmic transformations, the sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio were linearly inversely related to the minimal distance between the brain location and electrode contacts (slope≈-3.6). The signa-to-noise ratio and sensitivity in the thalamus and brain stem were comparable to those locations at the vicinity of electrode contact implantation. The HGGB source estimates were remarkably consistent with analyses of intracranial-contact data. In conclusion, distributed sEEG source modeling provides a powerful neuroimaging tool, which facilitates anatomically-normalized functional mapping of human brain using both iERP and HBBG data.

Endoscopic versus stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions involving the ventricles.

Stereotactic biopsies of ventricular lesions may be less safe and less accurate than biopsies of superficial lesions. Accordingly, endoscopic biopsies have been increasingly used for these lesions. Except for pineal tumors, the literature lacks clear, reliable comparisons of these two methods. All 1581 adults undergoing brain tumor biopsy from 2007 to 2018 were retrospectively assessed. We selected 119 patients with intraventricular or paraventricular lesions considered suitable for both stereotactic and endoscopic biopsies. A total of 85 stereotactic and 38 endoscopic biopsies were performed. Extra procedures, including endoscopic third ventriculostomy and tumor cyst aspiration, were performed simultaneously in 5 stereotactic and 35 endoscopic cases. In 9 cases (5 stereotactic, 4 endoscopic), the biopsies were nondiagnostic (samples were nondiagnostic or the results differed from those obtained from the resected lesions). Three people died: 2 (1 stereotactic, 1 endoscopic) from delayed intraventricular bleeding and 1 (stereotactic) from brain edema. No permanent morbidity occurred. In 6 cases (all stereotactic), additional surgery was required for hydrocephalus within the first month postbiopsy. Rates of nondiagnostic biopsies, serious complications, and additional operations were not significantly different between groups. Mortality was higher after biopsy of lesions involving the ventricles, compared with intracranial lesions in any location (2.4% vs 0.3%, p = 0.016). Rates of nondiagnostic biopsies and complications were similar after endoscopic or stereotactic biopsies. Ventricular area biopsies were associated with higher mortality than biopsies in any brain area.

Navigated Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Evaluating the Combined Use of a Frame-Based Stereotactic System and a Navigation System.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a complex surgical procedure that requires detailed anatomical knowledge. In many fields of neurosurgery navigation systems are used to display anatomical structures during an operation to aid performing these surgeries. In frame-based DBS, the advantage of visualization has not yet been evaluated during the procedure itself. In this study, we added live visualization to a frame-based DBS system, using a standard navigation system and investigated its accuracy and potential use in DBS surgery. As a first step, a phantom study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of the navigation system in conjunction with a frame-based approach. As a second step, 5 DBS surgeries were performed with this combined approach. Afterwards, 3 neurosurgeons and 2 neurologists with different levels of experience evaluated the potential use of the system with a questionnaire. Moreover, the additional personnel, costs and required set up time were noted and compared to 5 consecutive standard procedures. In the phantom study, the navigation system showed an inaccuracy of 2.1 mm (mean SD 0.69 mm). In the questionnaire, a mean of 9.4/10 points was awarded for the use of the combined approach as a teaching tool, a mean of 8.4/10 for its advantage in creating a 3-dimensional (3-D) map and a mean of 8/10 points for facilitating group discussions. Especially neurosurgeons and neurologists in training found it useful to better interpret clinical results and side effects (mean 9/10 points) and neurosurgeons appreciated its use to better interpret microelectrode recordings (mean 9/10 points). A mean of 6/10 points was awarded when asked if the benefits were worth the additional efforts. Initially 2 persons, then one additional person was required to set up the system with no relevant added time or costs. Using a navigation system for live visualization during frame-based DBS surgery can improve the understanding of the complex 3-D anatomy and many aspects of the procedure itself. For now, we would regard it as an excellent teaching tool rather than a necessity to perform DBS surgeries.

A Reproducible New Model of Focal Ischemic Injury in the Marmoset Monkey: MRI and Behavioural Follow-Up.

Ischemic stroke mostly affects the primary motor cortex and descending motor fibres, with consequent motor impairment. Pre-clinical models of stroke with reproducible and long-lasting sensorimotor deficits in higher-order animals are lacking. We describe a new method to induce focal brain damage targeting the motor cortex to study damage to the descending motor tracts in the non-human primate. Stereotaxic injection of malonate into the primary motor cortex produced a focal lesion in middle-aged marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Assessment of sensorimotor function using a neurological scale and testing of forelimb dexterity and strength lasted a minimum of 12 weeks. Lesion evolution was followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 24 h, 1 week, 4 and 12 weeks post-injury and before sacrifice for immunohistochemistry. Our model produced consistent lesions of the motor cortex, subcortical white matter and caudate nucleus. All animals displayed partial spontaneous recovery with long lasting motor deficits of force (54% loss) and dexterity (≈ 70% loss). Clearly visible T2 hypointensity in the white matter was observed with MRI and corresponded to areas of chronic gliosis in the internal capsule and lenticular fasciculus. We describe a straightforward procedure to reproducibly injure the motor cortex in the marmoset monkey, causing long-lasting motor deficits. The MRI signature reflects Wallerian degeneration and remote injury of corticospinal and corticopontine tracts, as well as subcortical motor loops. Our model may be suitable for the testing of therapies for post-stroke recovery, particularly in the chronic phase.

Time Efficiency in Stereotactic Robot-Assisted Surgery: An Appraisal of the Surgical Procedure and Surgeon's Learning Curve.

BACKGROUND: Frame-based stereotactic procedures are still the gold standard in neurosurgery. However, there is an increasing interest in robot-assisted technologies. Introducing these increasingly complex tools in the clinical setting raises the question about the time efficiency of the system and the essential learning curve of the surgeon. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled a consecutive series of patients undergoing a robot-assisted procedure after first system installation at one institution. All procedures were performed by the same neurosurgeon to capture the learning curve. The objective read-out were the surgical procedure time (SPT), the skin-to-skin time, and the intraoperative registration time (IRT) after laser surface registration (LSR), bone fiducial registration (BFR), and skin fiducial registration (SFR), as well as the quality of the registration (as measured by the fiducial registration error [FRE]). The time measures were compared to those for a patient group undergoing classic frame-based stereotaxy. RESULTS: In the first 7 months, we performed 31 robot-assisted surgeries (26 biopsies, 3 stereotactic electroencephalography [SEEG] implantations, and 2 endoscopic procedures). The SPT was depending on the actual type of surgery (biopsies: 85.0 ± 36.1 min; SEEG: 154.9 ± 75.9 min; endoscopy: 105.5 ± 1.1 min; p = 0.036). For the robot-assisted biopsies, there was a significant reduction in SPT within the evaluation period, reaching the level of frame-based surgeries (58.1 ± 17.9 min; p < 0.001). The IRT was depending on the applied registration method (LSR: 16.7 ± 2.3 min; BFR: 3.5 ± 1.1 min; SFR: 3.5 ± 1.6 min; p < 0.001). In contrast to BFR and SFR, there was a significant reduction in LSR time during that period (p = 0.038). The FRE differed between the applied registration methods (LSR: 0.60 ± 0.17 mm; BFR: 0.42 ± 0.15 mm; SFR: 2.17 ± 0.78 mm; p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in LSR quality during the evaluation period (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Introducing stereotactic, robot-assisted surgery in an established clinical setting initially necessitates a prolonged intraoperative preparation time. However, there is a steep learning curve during the first cases, reaching the time level of classic frame-based stereotaxy. Thus, a stereotactic robot can be integrated into daily routine within a decent period of time, thereby expanding the neurosurgeons' armamentarium, especially for procedures with multiple trajectories.

Accuracy and Safety of Customized Stereotactic Fixtures for Stereoelectroencephalography in Pediatric Patients.

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in children with intractable epilepsy presents particular challenges. Their thin and partially ossified cranium, specifically in the temporal area, is prone to fracture while attaching stereotactic systems to the head or stabilizing the head in robot's field of action. Postponing SEEG in this special population of patients can have serious consequences, reducing their chances of becoming seizure-free and impacting their social and cognitive development. This study demonstrates the safety and accuracy offered by a frameless personalized 3D printed stereotactic implantation system for SEEG investigations in children under 4 years of age. SEEG was carried out in a 3-year-old patient with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, based on a right temporal-perisylvian epileptogenic zone hypothesis. Fifteen intracerebral electrodes were placed using a StarFix patient-customized stereotactic fixture. The median lateral entry point localization error of the electrodes was 0.90 mm, median lateral target point localization error was 1.86 mm, median target depth error was 0.83 mm, and median target point localization error was 1.96 mm. There were no perioperative complications. SEEG data led to a tailored right temporal-insular-opercular resection, with resulting seizure freedom (Engel IA). In conclusion, patient-customized stereotactic fixtures are a safe and accurate option for SEEG exploration in young children.

High-gamma modulation language mapping with stereo-EEG: A novel analytic approach and diagnostic validation.

OBJECTIVE: A novel analytic approach for task-related high-gamma modulation (HGM) in stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) was developed and evaluated for language mapping. METHODS: SEEG signals, acquired from drug-resistant epilepsy patients during a visual naming task, were analyzed to find clusters of 50-150 Hz power modulations in time-frequency domain. Classifier models to identify electrode contacts within the reference neuroanatomy and electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) speech/language sites were developed and validated. RESULTS: In 21 patients (9 females), aged 4.8-21.2 years, SEEG HGM model predicted electrode locations within Neurosynth language parcels with high diagnostic odds ratio (DOR 10.9, p < 0.0001), high specificity (0.85), and fair sensitivity (0.66). Another SEEG HGM model classified ESM speech/language sites with significant DOR (5.0, p < 0.0001), high specificity (0.74), but insufficient sensitivity. Time to largest power change reliably localized electrodes within Neurosynth language parcels, while, time to center-of-mass power change identified ESM sites. CONCLUSIONS: SEEG HGM mapping can accurately localize neuroanatomic and ESM language sites. SIGNIFICANCE: Predictive modelling incorporating time, frequency, and magnitude of power change is a useful methodology for task-related HGM, which offers insights into discrepancies between HGM language maps and neuroanatomy or ESM.

Can we accurately lateralize the epileptogenic zone in patients who have seizure clusters? A study using stereo-electroencephalography.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the ictal onset recorded with stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) during clusters of seizures is reliable to identify the laterality of the epileptogenic zone. BACKGROUND: In the presurgical evaluation of patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy, the presence of bilateral ictal onset is usually associated with a poor surgical outcome. It has been reported that the laterality of seizures can be influenced during seizure clusters, although this remains controversial. Most studies have addressed this issue using scalp EEG which could erroneously determine the laterality of the ictal onset. METHODS: We examined all consecutive patients who underwent SEEG with bilateral hemispheric coverage at our institution between January 2013 and September 2018. We assessed the presence of seizure clusters (clinical or subclinical), their laterality by SEEG and the surgical outcome of the patients. A descriptive clinical and electrographic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of 143 patients who underwent SEEG recordings, we identified only six patients who had bilateral ictal onset that went on to resective surgery. In all six patients the discordant seizures occurred during a seizure cluster. Three of these patients were seizure free at last follow up. CONCLUSION: Discordant seizures obtained during a seizure cluster may not necessarily mean that the patient has bilateral epilepsy, and therefore a poor post-surgical outcome. Seizure clusters may not reliably lateralize the epileptogenic zone.

Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Implantation Using a Customized Rapidly Manufactured Stereotactic Fixture with Submillimetric Euclidean Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: The microTargetingTM MicrotableTM Platform is a novel stereotactic system that can be more rapidly fabricated than currently available 3D-printed alternatives. We present the first case series of patients who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery guided by this platform and demonstrate its in vivo accuracy. METHODS: Ten patients underwent DBS at a single institution by the senior author and 15 leads were placed. The mean age was 69.1 years; four were female. The ventralis intermedius nucleus was targeted for patients with essential tremor and the subthalamic nucleus was targeted for patients with Parkinson's disease. RESULTS: Nine DBS leads in 6 patients were appropriately imaged to enable measurement of accuracy. The mean Euclidean electrode placement error (EPE) was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm, and the mean radial error was 0.80 ± 0.41 mm (n = 9). In the subset of CT scans performed greater than 1 month postoperatively (n = 3), the mean Euclidean EPE was 0.75 ± 0.17 mm and the mean radial error was 0.69 ± 0.17 mm. There were no surgical complications. CONCLUSION: The MicrotableTM platform is capable of submillimetric accuracy in patients undergoing stereotactic surgery. It has achieved clinical efficacy in our patients without surgical complications and has demonstrated the potential for superior accuracy compared to both traditional stereotactic frames and other common frameless systems.

Reliability of fluorescein-assisted stereotactic brain biopsies in predicting conclusive tissue diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of fluorescein sodium in predicting conclusive tissue diagnosis in stereotactic brain biopsies and to characterize features of contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing MRI lesions associated with fluorescence. METHODS: A total of 19 patients were studied, 14 of which had contrast-enhancing and 5 of which had non-enhancing lesions on preoperative T1 post-gadolinium MRI scan. All patients received 3 mg/kg fluorescein sodium during anesthesia induction. Biopsy specimens were photographed under the operating microscope, using the Yellow560 module, prior to histopathological analysis. Two observers blinded to the MRI scans and histopathological results categorized the photographs retrospectively as "fluorescent" or "not fluorescent." Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of fluorescence reliability were calculated for MRI contrast-enhancing lesions and confirmed location-concordance of tumor pathology based on rater's fluorescence status assessment. Results were correlated finally with final results on permanent sections. RESULTS: Strength of inter-rater fluorescence status agreement was found to be "substantial" (kappa = 0.771). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for "fluorescent" and "not fluorescent" specimen in comparison with MRI contrast-enhancing lesions were 97%, 40%, and 82%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for confirmed tumor pathology were 100%, 63%, and 91%, respectively. Permanent pathology revealed high-grade glioma n = 5, low-grade glioma n = 3, lymphoma n = 5, pineal tumor n = 2, hamartoma n = 1, and nonspecific hypercellularity n = 3. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescein-assisted stereotactic brain biopsies demonstrated a high likelihood to manifest fluorescence in contrast-enhancing MRI lesions, while adequately predicting conclusive tumor pathology.

Surface-Based Registration of MR Scan versus Refined Anatomy-Based Registration of CT Scan: Effect on the Accuracy of SEEG Electrodes Implantation Performed in Prone Position under Frameless Neuronavigation.

INTRODUCTION: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) refers to a commonly used diagnostic procedure to localise and define the epileptogenic zone of refractory focal epilepsies, by means of minimally invasive operation techniques without large craniotomies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the influence of different registration methods on the accuracy of SEEG electrode implantation under neuronavigation for paediatric patients with refractory epilepsy. METHODS: The clinical data of 18 paediatric patients with refractory epilepsy were retrospectively analysed. The SEEG electrodes were implanted under optical neuronavigation while the patients were in the prone position. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the surface-based registration of MR scan method and refined anatomy-based registration of CT scan. Registration time, accuracy, and the differences between electrode placement and preoperative planned position were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-six electrodes in 7 patients were placed under surface-based registration of MR scan, and 45 electrodes in 11 patients were placed under refined anatomy-based registration of CT scan. The registration time of surface-based registration of MR scan and refined anatomy-based registration of CT scan was 45 ± 12 min and 10 ± 4 min. In addition, the mean registration error, the error of insertion point, and target error were 3.6 ± 0.7 mm, 2.7 ± 0.7 mm, and 3.1 ± 0.5 mm in the surface-based registration of MR scan group, and 1.1 ± 0.3 mm, 1.5 ± 0.5 mm, and 2.2 ± 0.6 mm in the refined anatomy-based registration of CT scan group. The differences between the two registration methods were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The refined anatomy-based registration of CT scan method can improve the registration efficiency and electrode placement accuracy, and thereby can be considered as the preferred registration method in the application of SEEG electrode implantation under neuronavigation for treatment of paediatric intractable epilepsy.

Validation of High Precision Robot-Assisted Methods for Intracranial Applications: Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: This work attempts to simulate a robot-based autonomous targeted neurosurgical procedure such as biopsy on a vegetable specimen. The objective of the work is to validate the robot-based autonomous neuroregistration and neuronavigation for neurosurgery in terms of stereotactic navigation and target accuracy. CASE DESCRIPTION: A vegetable (carrot) fixed in a tray was used as a model. The tray was affixed with multiple markers. The robot autonomously registers the subject precisely and subsequently accesses the target. The navigation trajectory closely follows the path from the entry point to the target point, as specified in the medical image. The replication of procedures reveals that the target accuracies are within 1 mm. The results based on the case studies are presented. Intricate cases in terms of entry hole size, depth, and size of the target are considered for both phantom and vegetable trials. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the case studies show enhanced and consistent performance characteristics in terms of accuracy, precision, and repeatability with the added advantage of the economy of time. The case studies serve as validation for a high precision robot-assisted neuroregistration and neuronavigation task for neurosurgery and pave the way for further animal and human trials.

Surgical techniques: Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency-thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided RF-TC).

Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency-thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided RF-TC) consists of coupling SEEG investigation with RF-TC stereotactic lesioning directly through the recording electrodes. In this systematic review the surgical technique, indications, and outcomes are described. Maximum accuracy is reached when a frame-based procedure with a robotic assistance and a per-operative vascular X-ray imaging are performed. Monitoring of the lesioning procedure based on the impedance, a sharp modification of which indicates that the thermocoagulation has reached its maximum volume, allows the optimization of the lesion size. The first indication concerns patients in whom a SEEG is required to determine whether surgery is feasible and in whom resection is indeed possible. Even if surgery is performed owing to insufficient efficacy of SEEG-guided RF-TC, the procedure remains interesting owing to its high positive predictive value for good outcome after surgery. The second indication concerns patients in whom phase I non-invasive investigations have concluded to surgical contraindication and who may still undergo SEEG in a purely therapeutic perspective (small deep zones inaccessible to surgery and network nodes of large epileptic networks). Lastly, SEEG-guided RF-TC can be considered as a first-line treatment for periventricular nodular heterotopia (PNH). Independently of indication, the overall seizure-free rate is 23% and the responder rate is 58%. The best results are obtained for PNH (38% seizure-free and 81% responders), while the worst results have been reported for temporal lobe-epilepsy in a dedicated study. The overall complication rate is 2.5%. More evidence is needed to help determine the exact place of SEEG-guided RF-TC in the surgical management algorithm.

Laser interstitial thermotherapy (LiTT) in pediatric epilepsy surgery.

Laser interstitial thermotherapy (LiTT) is a novel stereotactic approach to the surgical treatment of severe drug-resistant focal epilepsies. This review extends our recent general review on this topic (Hoppe et al. Laser interstitial thermotherapy [LiTT] in epilepsy surgery. Seizure 2017; 48:45-52) with a focus on children (age <18 years). A PubMed search retrieved 25 uncontrolled case series reports that included a total of 179 pediatric patients as well as 7 review papers that specifically referred to using LiTT in pediatric epilepsy surgery (due August 31, 2018). Hypothalamic hamartomas (HH) represented the most frequent indication (64.2%) while therapeutic evidence for other more frequent etiologies underlying severe focal childhood epilepsies (e.g. focal cortical dysplasia, mesiotemporal sclerosis) is still scarce (n<20). For the published cases, the rate of severe complications was 3.4% and the overall complication rate was 23.5%. The seizure freedom rate (Engel class 1) was 57.5% (including patients with early follow-up and repeat thermoablations). None of the studies included the systematic evaluation of the cognitive outcome. Overall, the published evidence does not yet allow a scientific or clinical judgement on the utility of LiTT for pediatric epilepsy surgery. LiTT is likely to extend the neurosurgical toolbox with regard to deep brain lesions (e.g. HH). However, in cases that are equally accessible for both approaches therapeutic superiority of LiTT over open resective surgery still remains to be demonstrated. Recommendations for controlled though non-randomized outcome studies are provided.

Master Protocol Trial Design for Efficient and Rational Evaluation of Novel Therapeutic Oncology Devices.

Historically, the gold standard for evaluation of cancer therapeutics, including medical devices, has been the randomized clinical trial. Although high-quality clinical data are essential for safe and judicious use of therapeutic oncology devices, class II devices require only preclinical data for US Food and Drug Administration approval and are often not rigorously evaluated prior to widespread uptake. Herein, we review master protocol design in medical oncology and its application to therapeutic oncology devices, using examples from radiation oncology. Unique challenges of clinical testing of radiation oncology devices (RODs) include patient and treatment heterogeneity, lack of funding for trials by industry and health-care payers, and operator dependence. To address these challenges, we propose the use of master protocols to optimize regulatory, financial, administrative, quality assurance, and statistical efficiency of trials evaluating RODs. These device-specific master protocols can be extrapolated to other devices and encompass multiple substudies with the same design, statistical considerations, logistics, and infrastructure. As a practical example, we outline our phase I and II master protocol trial of stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiotherapy, which to the best of our knowledge is the first master protocol trial to test a ROD. Development of more efficient clinical trials is needed to promote thorough evaluation of therapeutic oncology devices, including RODs, in a resource-limited environment, allowing more practical and rapid identification of the most valuable advances in our field.

Invasive evaluation in children (SEEG vs subdural grids).

Designed from the 60s to the 80s for adults, and despite the development of many new techniques, invasive explorations still have indications in children with focal drug-resistant epilepsy. The main types are stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural explorations (SDE). They provide precise information on the localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), its relationships with eloquent cortex, and the feasibility of performing a tailored surgical resection. Thermocoagulations, which are a diagnostic and therapeutic tool, can be performed using SEEG electrodes. Both techniques are feasible in children, with an age limitation for SEEG (which requires a bone thickness above 2 mm). The complication rate is higher with SDE. Opposed for a long time and never compared in a systematic study, they should presently be considered complementary. The indications cannot be directly inferred from those for adults, as there are pediatric particularities in the seizures' semiology, functional areas, imaging and urgent situations. We successively discuss the choice in individual cases of SEEG or SDE respectively, the specific problematic in infancy and early childhood, the schema in SEEG for cryptogenic epilepsies (in particular insular), the particularities of polymicrogyria and deeply located lesions, and finally, SEEG designed for thermocoagulations. Future improvements should include more accurate implantation schemas thanks to advanced non-invasive explorations and possibilities to perform SEEG in infants.

Comparison of narcotic pain control between stereotactic electrocorticography and subdural grid implantation.

INTRODUCTION: The choice of subdural grid (SDG) or stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) for patients with epilepsy can be complex and in some cases overlap. Comparing postoperative pain and narcotics consumption with SDG or sEEG can help develop an intracranial monitoring strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for adult patients undergoing SDG or sEEG monitoring. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was used for pain assessment. Types and dosage of the opioids were calculated by converting into milligram morphine equivalents (MME). Narcotic consumption was analyzed at the following three time periods: I. the first 24 h of implantation; II. from the second postimplantation day to the day of explantation; and III. the days following electrode removal to discharge. RESULTS: Forty-two patients who underwent SDG and 31 patients who underwent sEEG implantation were analyzed. After implantation, average NRS was 3.7 for SDG and 2.2 for sEEG (P < .001). After explantation, the NRS was 3.5 for SDG and 1.4 in sEEG (P < .001). Sixty percent of SDG patients and 13% of sEEG patients used more than one opioid in period III (P < .001). The SDG group had a significantly higher MME throughout the three periods compared with the sEEG group: period I: 448 (SDG) vs. 205 (sEEG) mg, P = .002; period II: 377 (SDG) vs. 102 (sEEG) mg, P < .001; and period III: 328 (SDG) vs. 75 (sEEG) mg; P = .002. Patients with the larger SDG implantation had the higher NRS (P = .03) and the higher MME at period I (P = .019). There was no correlation between the number of depth electrodes and pain control in patients with sEEG. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing sEEG had significantly less pain and required fewer opiates compared with patients with SDG. These differences in perioperative pain may be a consideration when choosing between these two invasive monitoring options.

A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis-guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Impalpable breast cancers require precise pre-operative lesion localisation to minimise re-excision rates. Conventional techniques include hookwire insertion using stereotactic guidance. Newer techniques include the use of tomosynthesis guidance and the use of iodine-125 seeds. This study compares the accuracy of lesion localisation with hookwire or seed insertion using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance. METHODS: This registered quality improvement activity did not require formal ethics approval. The post-localisation images for 116 lesions were reviewed. The distance from the lesion or breast biopsy marker to the hookwire or seed was measured on post-insertion mammograms. The relative placement accuracy of hookwire or seed using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance was compared. A lesion to seed or wire distance > 10 mm was considered technically unsatisfactory. RESULTS: 94.8% of the seeds and wires inserted via prone stereotactic guidance were accurately placed, compared with 89.6% of those inserted via upright tomosynthesis. There were twice as many technically unsatisfactory insertions under upright tomosynthesis guidance. The majority of the unsatisfactory insertions using upright tomosynthesis occurred when the lesion was at or below the level of the nipple and the insertion was performed craniocaudally. CONCLUSION: The degree of accuracy of pre-operative localisation of impalpable breast lesions is significantly higher with the use of prone stereotactic rather than upright tomosynthesis guidance. This was most evident with the placement of I-125 seeds, and in cases where the target lesion was located below the level of the nipple.